Identification of enzymes responsible for nitrazepam metabolism and toxicity in human.

Nitrazepam (NZP) is a hypnotic agent that rarely causes liver injuries in humans and teratogenicity in rodents. In humans, NZP is primarily metabolized to 7-aminonitrazepam (ANZP) by reduction and subsequently to 7-acetylamino nitrazepam (AANZP) by acetylation. ANZP can be regenerated from AANZP by hydrolysis in rodents, but it is still unclear whether this reaction occurs in humans. In rodents, AANZP may be associated with teratogenicity, while in humans, it is known that drug-induced liver injuries may be caused by NZP reactive metabolite(s). In this study, we attempted to identify the enzymes responsible for NZP metabolism to obtain a basic understanding of this process and the associated metabolite toxicities. We found that the NZP reductase activity in human liver cytosol (HLC) was higher than that in human liver microsomes (HLM). We purified the responsible enzyme(s) from HLC and found that the NZP reductase was aldehyde oxidase 1 (AOX1). The role of AOX1 was confirmed by an observed increase in the NZP reductase activity upon addition of N1-methylnicotinamide, an electron donor of AOX1, as well as inhibition of this activity in HLC in the presence of AOX1 inhibitors. ANZP was acetylated to form AANZP by N-acetyltransferase (NAT) 2. An experiment using recombinant esterases in an inhibition study using HLM revealed that AANZP is hydrolyzed by arylacetamide deacetylase (AADAC) in the human liver. N-Hydroxylamino NZP, which is suspected to be a reactive metabolite, was detected as a conjugate with N-acetyl-l-cysteine through NZP reduction and ANZP hydroxylation reactions. In the latter reaction, the conjugate was readily formed by recombinant CYP3A4 among the various P450 isoforms tested. In sum, we found that AOX1, NAT2, AADAC, and CYP3A4 are the determinants for the pharmacokinetics of NZP and that they confer interindividual variability in sensitivity to NZP side effects.

Melatonin, hypnotics and their association with fracture: a matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: although melatonin prescribing in England has been increasing in recent years, there have been no large scale studies on the safety of melatonin compared to other medical treatments for insomnia. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between exposure to melatonin, hypnotic benzodiazepines (temazepam, nitrazepam) or Z-drugs (zolpidem, zopiclone) and fracture risk. DESIGN: retrospective cohort study. SETTING: 309 general practices contributing to The Health Improvement Network (THIN) between 2008 and 2013. PARTICIPANTS: 1,377 patients aged 45 years and older prescribed melatonin; 880 patients prescribed hypnotic benzodiazepines; 1,148 patients prescribed Z-drugs and 2,752 unexposed controls matched by age, gender and practice. MAIN OUTCOME: fracture following prescription of study drugs ascertained from practice records. RESULTS: the unadjusted hazard ratios for fracture during the follow-up period were 1.90 (95% CI 1.41-2.57) for melatonin, 1.70 (95% CI 1.18-2.46) for hypnotic benzodiazepines and 2.03 (95% CI 1.45-2.84) for Z-drugs. After adjustment for 26 covariates, the hazard ratios were 1.44 (95% CI 1.01-2.04) for melatonin, 1.26 (95% CI 0.82-1.92) for hypnotic benzodiazepines and 1.52 (95% CI 1.04-2.23) for Z-drugs. Only patients with three or more melatonin prescriptions had elevated risk. The mean time to fracture was 1.04 years and there was no significant difference in mean time to fracture between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: in this large cohort of patients attending UK primary care, prescriptions for melatonin and Z-drugs were associated with a significantly increased risk of fracture. With the use of melatonin increasing steadily overtime, this study adds to the literature on the safety profile of this drug.

Is long-term use of benzodiazepine a risk for cancer?

The carcinogenicity of benzodiazepines (BZDs) is still unclear. We aimed to assess whether long-term benzodiazepines use is risk for cancer.We conducted a longitudinal population-based case-control study by using 12 years from Taiwan National Health Insurance database and investigated the association between BZDs use and cancer risk of people aged over 20 years. During the study period, 42,500 cases diagnosed with cancer were identified and analyzed for BZDs use. For each case, six eligible controls matched for age, sex, and the index date (ie, free of any cancer in the date of case diagnosis) by using propensity score. For appropriate risk estimation, we observed the outcomes according to their length of exposure (LOE) and defined daily dose (DDD). To mimic bias, we adjusted with potential confounding factors such as medications and comorbid diseases which could influence for cancer risk during the study period. The data was analyzed by using Cox proportional hazard regression and conditional logistic regression.The finding unveils benzodiazepines use into safe and unsafe groups for their carcinogenicity. The use of diazepam (HR, 0.96; 95%CI, 0.92-1.00), chlorodizepoxide (HR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.92-1.04), medazepam (HR, 1.01; 95%CI, 0.84-1.21), nitrazepam (HR, 1.06; 95%CI, 0.98-1.14), oxazepam (HR, 1.05; 95%CI, 0.94-1.17) found safer among BZDs. However, clonazepam (HR, 1.15; 95%CI, 1.09-1.22) were associated with a higher risk for cancers. Moreover, specific cancer risk among BZDs use was observed significantly increased 98% for brain, 25% for colorectal, and 10% for lung, as compared with non-BZDs use.Diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, medazepam, nitrazepam, and oxazepam are safe among BZDs use for cancer risk. Our findings could help physicians to select safer BZDs and provide an evidence on the carcinogenic effect of benzodiazepines use by considering the LOE and DDD for further research.

[The withdrawal syndrome in benzodiazepine dependence and its management]. / Managementul sindromului de abstinenta in dependenta la benzodiazepine.

UNLABELLED: The authors present the result of an observational study about the withdrawal syndrome in benzodiazepine dependence, and the aspect of identifying withdrawal symptoms, effective communication with the patient and the structure of withdrawal programmes. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study included a number of 22 pacients hospitalised in the Drug-Dependence Clinic of Iasi between January 2006 - December 2008. RESULTS: The present article consists of data covering current issues in the area of withdrawal syndrome in benzodiazepine dependence. The most prescribed benzodiazepines were diazepam (10 cases), followed by alprazolam (5 cases) and nitrazepam (4 cases). The clinical manifestations such as anxiety, insomnia, concentration problems, fatigability were present at all patients.

Road traffic accident risk related to prescriptions of the hypnotics zopiclone, zolpidem, flunitrazepam and nitrazepam.

BACKGROUND: Despite the high prescription rate of benzodiazepine-like hypnotics (z-hypnotics), there is limited information on the road traffic accident risk associated with the use of these drugs. We wanted to investigate whether filling a prescription for zopiclone or zolpidem was associated with increased risk of road traffic accidents at a national population level. Nitrazepam and flunitrazepam were used as comparator drugs. METHOD: All Norwegians 18-69 years (3.1 million) were followed-up from January 2004 until the end of September 2006. Information on prescriptions, road traffic accidents and emigration/death was obtained from three Norwegian population-based registries. The first week after the hypnotics had been dispensed was considered to be the exposure period. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated by comparing the incidence of accidents in the exposed person-time to the incidence of accidents in the unexposed person-time. RESULTS: During exposure, 129 accidents were registered for zopiclone, 21 for zolpidem, 27 for nitrazepam and 18 for flunitrazepam. The SIRs were (SIR for all ages and both sexes combined; 95% CI): z-hypnotics (zopiclone+zolpidem) 2.3; 2.0-2.7, nitrazepam 2.7; 1.8-3.9 and flunitrazepam 4.0; 2.4-6.4. The highest SIRs were found among the youngest users for all hypnotics. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that users of hypnotics had a clearly increased risk of road traffic accidents. The SIR for flunitrazepam was particularly high.

Cross-sensitivity in a child with anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome.

We describe a fulminant picture of anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS) and the possible role of nitrazepam. A 5-month-old boy developed fever and rash after the use of phenobarbitone. Allergy to phenobarbitone was suspected. Nitrazepam was substituted for seizure control. Over the next few days he progressively collapsed with fever, facial oedema and multi-organ involvement. The diagnosis of AHS was delayed because nitrazepam has not been implicated in the development of cross-sensitivity. AHS is a severe multi-organ reaction to aromatic anti-epileptic drugs. It has been thought to occur as a consequence of pre-existing pharmacogenetic and immunologic abnormalities. Careful selection of anti-epileptic drugs is essential as cross-sensitivity is common. Intermittent benzodiazepines have been recommended in managing breakthrough seizures in AHS. However, the structure of benzodiazepines contains aromatic rings and potential cross-reactivity cannot be totally ignored. Although we do not have direct proof, we believe that nitrazepam prolonged the clinical course.

Modeling cumulative dose and exposure duration provided insights regarding the associations between benzodiazepines and injuries.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate assessment of medication impact requires modeling cumulative effects of exposure duration and dose; however, postmarketing studies usually represent medication exposure by baseline or current use only. We propose new methods for modeling various aspects of medication use history and employment of them to assess the adverse effects of selected benzodiazepines. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Time-dependent measures of cumulative dose or duration of use, with weighting of past exposures by recency, were proposed. These measures were then included in alternative versions of the multivariable Cox model to analyze the risk of fall related injuries among the elderly new users of three benzodiazepines (nitrazepam, temazepam, and flurazepam) in Quebec. Akaike's information criterion (AIC) was used to select the most predictive model for a given benzodiazepine. RESULTS: The best-fitting model included a combination of cumulative duration and current dose for temazepam, and cumulative dose for flurazepam and nitrazepam, with different weighting functions. The window of clinically relevant exposure was shorter for flurazepam than for the two other products. CONCLUSION: Careful modeling of the medication exposure history may enhance our understanding of the mechanisms underlying their adverse effects.

Nitrazepam for the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is a severe childhood epileptic syndrome with encephalopathy and multiple seizure types, which are often intractable to treatment. Most of these children will ultimately become mentally retarded and dependent on others for their daily care. Antiepileptic drugs are the mainstay of treatment, however, no particular drug is entirely effective. Apart from the use of antiepileptic drugs, nonpharmacologic treatments are also considered (i.e., callosotomy, ketogenic diet, and vagus nerve stimulation), which have proven to be partially effective. We prospectively studied 14 children (11 months-8 years of age) with medication-resistant Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, being treated with nitrazepam (open-label compassionate protocol). We compared the 1-month baseline seizure frequency with the median seizure rate reduction during the first 12 months of treatment with nitrazepam. The median seizure rate reduction during the first 12 months of treatment with nitrazepam was 41% (P = 0.001), with more than 50% seizure reduction in 60% of patients. Two patients became seizure free, five patients demonstrated at least 50% reduction in seizure rates, six patients had at least 25% seizure rate reduction, and one patient did not respond. No patient had any serious adverse effects. Side effects included sedation in six children (40%) and drooling in nine patients (60%).

A population-based case-control teratologic study of nitrazepam, medazepam, tofisopam, alprazolum and clonazepam treatment during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To study the association between nitrazepam, medazepam, tofisopam, alprazolum and clonazepam treatments during pregnancy and prevalence of different congenital abnormalities (CAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A matched case-control study using cases with CAs and population controls from the dataset of the nationwide Hungarian Case-Control Surveillance of Congenital Abnormalities (HCCSCA), 1980-1996. RESULTS: Of 38,151 pregnant women who had babies without any defects (population control group), 75 (0.20%) were treated with these five benzodiazepines during pregnancy. Of 22,865 pregnant women who delivered offspring with CAs, 57 (0.25%) had benzodiazepine treatment. The occurrence of five benzodiazepine treatments during the second and third months of gestation, i.e. in the critical period for most major CAs did not show significant differences in matched case-control pairs. CONCLUSION: Treatment with five benzodiazepines studied during pregnancy did not present detectable teratogenic risk to the fetus in humans but the amount of information was limited for different CAs.

Incidence of death in patients with intractable epilepsy during nitrazepam treatment.

PURPOSE: Increased risk of death has been reported in patients with intractable epilepsy (IE) taking nitrazepam (NZP). METHODS: Between January 1983 and March 1994, 302 patients with IE were entered into a NZP compassionate-plea protocol. NZP was discontinued if there was < 50% seizure reduction or significant side effects. In some patients with > 50% reduction, it also was discontinued for lack of sufficient effect. At the end of follow-up for this study, 62 patients remained taking NZP. Patients took NZP from 3 days to 10 years. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 302 patients died after institution of NZP. Fourteen of 21 of these were taking NZP at death, and in five of 21, the NZP had been discontinued. Two patients were excluded from analysis, because it is unclear whether NZP had been discontinued before death. Six other patients were lost from follow-up. Of the 14 deaths with NZP, seven were sudden, six were of pneumonia, and one was of cystinosis. Nine had at least one contributing factor, such as dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux, or recurrent aspirations. The 294 patients took NZP for a total of 704 patient years (ptyrs), and were discontinued for a total of 856 ptyrs. There were 1.98 deaths/ 100 ptyrs on NZP compared with 0.58 deaths/100 ptyrs without NZP, most of the former being associated with side effects of NZP. Mortality in patients younger than 3.4 years was 3.98 with NZP compared with 0.26 deaths/100 ptyrs without NZP (p = 0.0002). Corresponding figures in patients 3.4 years or older were 0.50 and 0.86 deaths/100 ptyrs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NZP therapy for epilepsy apparently increases the risk of death, especially in young patients with IE. This should be considered in antiepileptic drug (AED) management decisions.

Non-traumatic rhabdomyolysis with gluteal ulcer.

The case is presented of a 34-year-old woman with rhabdomyolysis due to massive intake of nimetazepam, a benzodiazepine hypnotic. On admission, the patient had numerous blisters all over the body. One of the blisters in the gluteal region developed into a deep ulcer accompanied by muscle necrosis although it was not at a pressure point. The ulcer needed surgical intervention. Rhabdomyolysis is caused by the lysis and necrosis of muscle due to direct or indirect injury, high fever, ischaemia, hypoxia or enzyme defects. Release of myocyte components into the circulation then may induce major problems, especially acute renal failure associated with hypermyoglobinaemia. However, there have been few reports of cutaneous ulcer formation in non-traumatic rhabdomyolysis.

Hallucinations after a therapeutic dose of benzodiazepine hypnotics with co-administration of erythromycin.

A case of repetitive hallucinations during treatment with a therapeutic dosage of triazolam (0.25 mg/day) and nitrazepam (5 mg/day) is presented. The patient suffered from acute pneumonia and chronic renal failure. Such non-psychotic symptoms as anxiety, tremor and depressed feeling were observed initially. However, after co-administration of erythromycin (600 mg/day), visual hallucinations and abnormal bodily sensations developed repeatedly after each administration of triazolam or nitrazepam. This report suggests that benzodiazepine hypnotics even at a therapeutic dosage with co-administration of erythromycin causes serious psychotic symptoms in vulnerable patients with physical complications.

Nitrazepam for refractory infantile spasms and the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

Infantile spasms and the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome are considered to be age-specific pediatric epileptic syndromes and together constitute a significant percentage of medically resistant seizures in childhood. Twenty children, ages 4 to 28 months (median, 12 months), with medically refractory infantile spasms or the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, were treated with the investigational benzodiazepine nitrazepam in an open-label study. Daily dosage of nitrazepam ranged from 0.5 to 3.5 mg/kg, with a median dosage of 1.5 mg/kg, divided into two doses per day. Side effects included pooling of oral secretions (12 children) and sedation (six children); however, no serious side effects were seen. Responses to nitrazepam were as follows: five complete responses (cessation of all seizures), seven partial responses (greater than 50% reduction of seizures), and eight with no response. Median duration of response was 9 months (range, 4 to 16 months) in children with infantile spasms and 14 months (range, 8 to 26 months) in children with the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Nitrazepam is an effective anticonvulsant in this small cohort of children with medically refractory infantile spasms and the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, resulting in a 25% response rate and only modest side effects.

Triazolam and nitrazepam use in elderly outpatients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine adverse reactions and effects on sleep among three groups of patients: those taking triazolam, those taking nitrazepam, and a control group. DESIGN: Telephone interviews. PATIENTS: Forty-seven patients taking triazolam, 36 taking nitrazepam, and 40 control patients. All study participants were outpatients over 60 years of age. RESULTS: The rate of awakening in the middle of sleep was not significantly different among patients taking triazolam (61.7 percent) and those taking nitrazepam (69.4 percent). Incidence of nocturia, the primary reason for awakening, was not significantly different between triazolam- (36.2 percent) and nitrazepam-taking patients (41.7 percent). The rate of having difficulty falling back to sleep was significantly different among triazolam (62.1 percent) and nitrazepam (8 percent), and triazolam and control (11.1 percent) groups (p < 0.01). No difference was evident, however, between nitrazepam and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients taking nitrazepam have less difficulty returning to sleep compared with those who take triazolam. Thus, for elderly patients who awaken because of nocturia, nitrazepam may be more appropriate therapy.

Nitrazepam-induced cricopharyngeal dysphagia, abnormal esophageal peristalsis and associated bronchospasm: probable cause of nitrazepam-related sudden death.

Nitrazepam was used in the treatment of resistant myoclonic epilepsy in 38 children. After the occurrence of nitrazepam-associated swallowing incoordination, high-peaked esophageal peristalsis and related bronchospasm in one patient, we initiated a prospective study of esophageal manometry using a station pull-through technique with a pediatric 4-channel continuous perfusing system. Three more patients were found to have delayed cricopharyngeal relaxation and high-peaked esophageal peristaltic waves. The initial patient developed severe respiratory distress and bronchospasm necessitating ventilatory support while on nitrazepam and improved dramatically with subsequent normal manometric study following nitrazepam discontinuation. Nitrazepam was reintroduced for its anticonvulsant and cognitive benefits and was tolerated at a reduced dosage. We postulate a central nervous system effect of nitrazepam promoting parasympathetic overactivity or vagotonia which can cause potentially fatal respiratory distress. Care must be exercised in nitrazepam use and esophageal manometry may be helpful in defining patients at greater risk for sudden death.