Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 126
Filter
2.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 24(1): 3, 2024 01 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166569

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aslanger's pattern in electrocardiogram (ECG) indicates that patients may have acute inferior myocardial infarction(AMI) with concomitant critical stenoses on other coronary arteries, which needs to be evaluated the timing of revascularization as risk equivalents of ST elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI). CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 62-year-old male with chief complaint of intermittent exertional subxiphoid pain for 20 days from 30th June. One day after the last episode (19th July), the 18-lead electrocardiogram showed ST segment elevation of 0.05-0.1mV in lead III, ST segment depression in leads I, avL, and V2-V6, T wave inversion with positive terminal vector in lead V4-V5, and positive T wave in lead V6, which indicated Aslanger's pattern. With increased Troponin I (0.162ng/mL, 0-0.02), The patient was diagnosed as acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and admitted to coronary ward on 20th July. The coronary angiography showed 95% stenosis in the distal left main coronary artery (LM) to the ostium of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), 90% stenosis in the proximal segment of the LAD, and 80% stenosis in the middle segment of the LAD, and TIMI blood flow was graded score 2. Three drug-eluting stents were implanted at the lesions. The patient's ECG returned close to normal one month after revascularization. CONCLUSION: We presented an acute coronary syndrome case whose ECG showed with Aslanger's pattern (i.e., isolated ST-segment elevation in lead III, associated ST-segment depression in lead V4-V6 with positive T wave/terminal vector, and greater ST-segment elevation in lead V1 than in lead V2), and was confirmed severe stenosis of the LM and the proximal segment of the LAD via coronary angiography. In clinical practice, especially in the emergency, patients with ECG presenting Aslanger's pattern should be urgently evaluated with prompt treatment, and the timing of emergency coronary angiography and revascularization should be evaluated to avoid adverse outcomes caused by delayed treatment.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Constriction, Pathologic , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Coronary Angiography , Electrocardiography , Arrhythmias, Cardiac
3.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(10)2023 Oct 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37893524

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives. Recent guidelines have downgraded the routine use of the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) due to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Despite this, its use in clinical practice remains high. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of the IABP in patients with STEMI complicated by CS undergoing primary PCI (pPCI), focusing on patients with anterior MI in whom a major benefit has been previously hypothesized. Materials and Methods. We enrolled 2958 consecutive patients undergoing pPCI for STEMI in our department from 2005 to 2018. Propensity score matching and mortality analysis were performed. Results. CS occurred in 246 patients (8.3%); among these patients, 145 (60%) had anterior AMI. In the propensity-matched analysis, the use of the IABP was associated with a lower 30-day mortality (39.3% vs. 60.9%, p = 0.032) in the subgroup of patients with anterior STEMI. Conversely, in the whole group of CS patients and in the subgroup of patients with non-anterior STEMI, IABP use did not have a significant impact on mortality. Conclusions. The use of the IABP in cases of STEMI complicated by CS was found to improve survival in patients with anterior infarction. Prospective studies are needed before abandoning or markedly limiting the use of the IABP in this clinical setting.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Shock, Cardiogenic/surgery , Shock, Cardiogenic/complications , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/complications , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/adverse effects , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/methods , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Treatment Outcome
4.
Am J Cardiol ; 201: 252-259, 2023 08 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37393727

ABSTRACT

Rotational atherectomy (RA) is widely used in the percutaneous treatment of heavily calcified coronary artery lesions in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). However, the safety and efficacy of RA in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is not well established and is considered a relative contraindication. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RA in patients presenting with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), unstable angina (UA), and CCS. Consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with RA between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary single center were included. Patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) were excluded. The primary end points of interest were procedural success and procedural complications. The secondary end point was the risk of death or MI at 1 year. A total of 2,122 patients who underwent RA were included, of whom 1,271 presented with a CCS (59.9%), 632 presented with UA (29.8%), and 219 presented with NSTEMI (10.3%). Although an increased rate of slow-flow/no-reflow was noted in the UA population (p = 0.03), no significant difference in procedural success or procedural complications, including coronary dissection, perforation, or side-branch closure, was noted (p = NS). At 1 year, there were no significant differences in death or MI between CCS and non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS: UA + NSTEMI; adjusted hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 2.12); however, patients who presented with NSTEMI had a higher risk of death or MI than CCS (adjusted hazard ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 3.17). Use of RA in NSTE-ACS was associated with similar procedural success without an increased risk of procedural complications compared with patients with CCS. Although patients presenting with NSTEMI remained at higher risk of long-term adverse events, RA appears to be safe and feasible in patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions presenting with NSTE-ACS.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Atherectomy, Coronary , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Atherectomy, Coronary/adverse effects , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/surgery , Acute Coronary Syndrome/etiology , Angina, Unstable/epidemiology , Angina, Unstable/surgery , Angina, Unstable/drug therapy
5.
Microvasc Res ; 150: 104575, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37429354

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the association between ocular microvasculature (vascular density) on optical coherence tomography-angiography (OCT-A) and the cardiovascular risk profile of patients hospitalized for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. METHODS: Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with the diagnosis of NSTEMI and undergoing coronary angiography were divided into 3 groups as low, intermediate, and high risk according to the SYNTAX score. OCT-A imaging was performed in all three groups. Right-left selective coronary angiography images of all patients were analyzed. The SYNTAX and TIMI risk scores of all patients were calculated. RESULTS: This study included opthalmological examination of 114 NSTEMI patients. NSTEMI patients with high SYNTAX risk scores had significantly lower deep parafoveal vessel density (DPD) than patients with low-intermediate SYNTAX risk scores (p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis found that a DPD threshold below 51.65 % was moderately associated with high SYNTAX risk scores in patients with NSTEMI. In addition, NSTEMI patients with high TIMI risk scores had significantly lower DPD than patients with low-intermediate TIMI risk scores (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: OCT-A may be a non-invasive useful tool to assess the cardiovascular risk profile of NSTEMI patients with a high SYNTAX and TIMI score.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Risk Factors , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Coronary Angiography , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects
6.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 23(1): 357, 2023 07 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37461001

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies in populations with or without cardiovascular disease have shown that very high HDL-C levels are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. However, the exact relationship between HDL-C levels and long-term prognosis remains unknown in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: This was a post hoc secondary analysis of long-term follow-up results in patients undergoing PCI open-label, observational cohort study. Patients with MI who had undergone PCI were enrolled. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the relationship between HDL-C levels and the risk of cardiovascular events. RESULTS: A total of 1934 patients with MI undergoing PCI were enrolled in our analysis and our population was divided in 3 groups according to the HDL-C plasma levels: HDL-C < 40 mg/dL (low HDL-C); HDL-C between 40 and 80 mg/ dL (medium HDL-C); and HDL-C > 80 mg/dL (high HDL-C). RCS analysis showed a nonlinear U-shaped association between HDL-C levels and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients with NSTEMI with adjusted variables. After adjusting for potential confounders, the follow-up analysis indicated that high risk group had elevated occurrence of MACCE than low risk group (HDL-C 35 and 55 mg/dL) (OR:1.645, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis demonstrated that there is a U-shaped association between HDL-C and MACCE in patients with NSTEMI undergoing PCI.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Myocardial Infarction , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Cholesterol, HDL , Risk Factors , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
7.
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars ; 51(4): 256-265, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37272157

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Electrocardiography is used in the initial risk assessment of patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The frontal QRS-T angle is an electrocardiography parameter that may be affected by the alterations in the coronary blood flow. This study aimed to explore the relationship of the frontal QRS-T angle with coronary flow grade and adverse events in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. METHODS: A total of 191 non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients were divided into 2 groups based on the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow level on coronary angiography before revascularization, namely TIMI 0/1 and TIMI 2/3. The frontal QRS-T angle obtained before revascularization was compared between the groups and its relationship with adverse events was examined. In-hospital all-cause mortality, repeat target lesion revascular-ization, new-onset heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, and atrial fibrillation were defined as adverse events. RESULTS: Frontal QRS-T angle was wider in the patients with TIMI 0/1 flow compared to the patients with TIMI 2/3 flow (P  <  0.001). The frontal QRS-T angle was determined to be a predictor of TIMI flow grade 0/1 before revascularization in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (odds ratio: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.30-1.75; P < 0.001). The frontal QRS-T angle was a predictor of the adverse events during hospitalization in the patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (odds ratio: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.04-1.19; P = 0.002). The cut-off values of the frontal QRS-T angle for TIMI flow grade and adverse events were determined to be 73.5°, based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. CONCLUSION: Increased frontal QRS-T angle may be a useful electrocardiography parameter for determining TIMI flow grade and the need for an early invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Coronary Circulation/physiology , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography , Treatment Outcome , Electrocardiography
8.
Kardiol Pol ; 81(7-8): 746-753, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37270830

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend coronary catheterization in patients with non-ST- -segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) within 24 hours of hospital admission. However, whether there is a stepwise relationship between the time to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and long-term mortality in patients with NSTEMI treated invasively within 24 hours of admission has not been established yet. AIMS: The study aimed to evaluate the association between door-to-PCI time and all-cause mortality at 12 and 36 months in NSTEMI patients presenting directly to a PCI-capable center who underwent PCI within the first 24 hours of hospitalization. METHODS: We analyzed data of patients hospitalized for NSTEMI between 2007-2019, included in the nationwide registry of acute coronary syndromes. Patients were stratified into twelve groups based on 2-hour intervals of door-to-PCI time. The mortality rates of patients within those groups were adjusted for 33 confounding variables by the propensity score weighting method using overlap weights. RESULTS: A total of 37 589 patients were included in the study. The median age of included patients was 66.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 59.0-75.8) years; 66.7% were male, and the median GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) score was 115 (98-133). There were increased 12-month and 36-month mortality rates in consecutive groups of patients stratified by 2-hour door-to-PCI time intervals. After adjustment for patient characteristics, there was a significant positive correlation between the time to PCI and the mortality rates (rs = 0.61; P = 0.04 and rs = 0.65; P = 0.02 for 12-month and 36-month mortality, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The longer the door-to-PCI time, the higher were 12-month and 36-month all-cause mortality rates in NSTEMI patients.


Subject(s)
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Female , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Registries
9.
Physiol Meas ; 44(7)2023 07 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37307848

ABSTRACT

In the United States, approximately 720 000 adults will experience a myocardial infarction (MI) every year. The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is quintessential for the classification of a MI. About 30% of all MIs exhibit ST-segment elevation on the 12-lead ECG and is therefore classified as an ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), which is treated emergently with percutaneous coronary intervention to restore blood flow. However, in the remaining 70% of MIs, the 12-lead ECG lacks ST-segment elevation and instead exhibits a motley of changes, including ST-segment depression, T-wave inversion, or, in up to 20% of patients, have no changes whatsoever; as such, these MIs are classified as a Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI). Of this larger classification of MIs, 33% of NSTEMI actually have an occlusion of the culprit artery consistent with a Type I MI . This is a serious clinical problem because NSTEMI with an occluded culprit artery have similar myocardial damage like STEMI and are more likely to suffer from adverse outcomes compared to NSTEMI without an occluded culprit artery. In this review article, we review the extant literature on NSTEMI with an occluded culprit artery. Afterward, we generate and discuss hypotheses for the absence of ST-segment elevation on the 12-lead ECG: (1) transient occlusion (2) collateral blood flow and chronically occluded artery and (3) ECG-silent myocardial regions. Lastly, we describe and define novel ECG features that are associated with an occluded culprit artery in NSTEMI which include T-wave morphology abnormalities and novel markers of ventricular repolarization heterogeneity.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Adult , Humans , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/complications , Risk Factors , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Electrocardiography , Arteries
10.
Biomol Biomed ; 23(5): 866-872, 2023 Sep 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37212038

ABSTRACT

The current study aimed to explore whether the level of decrease in platelet distribution width (PDW), platelet-large cell ratio (P-LCR), and mean platelet volume (MPV) has prognostic value for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in acute myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) treated with clopidogrel. In this prospective observational cohort study, PDW, P-LCR, and MPV were determined on admission at the hospital and 24 h after clopidogrel treatment in 170 non-STEMI patients. MACEs were assessed over a one-year follow-up period. Using the Cox regression test, a decrease in PDW showed a significant association with the incidence of MACEs (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.99, p = 0.049) and overall survival rate (OR 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91-0.99, p = 0.016). Patients with a decrease in PDW<9.9% had a higher incidence of MACEs (OR 0.42, 95% CI = 0.24-0.72, p = 0.002) and a lower survival rate (OR 0.32, 95% CI = 0.12-0.90, p = 0.03) than patients who had a decrease in PDW < 9.9%. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis using log-rank test, patients who had a decrease in PDW < 9.9% had an increased risk for MACEs (p = 0.002) and lethal outcomes (p = 0.002). However, a decrease in MPV or P-LCR did not have prognostic value. A decrease in PDW < 9.9% measured 24 h after clopidogrel treatment in NSTEMI patients has good prognostic value for determining the short-term risks of MACEs, possibly providing a better risk stratification of those patients.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Mean Platelet Volume , Prognosis , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Prospective Studies , Clopidogrel , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Myocardial Infarction/etiology
11.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(3)2023 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36984506

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Percutaneous procedures using contrast agents are modern diagnosis and treatment methods for cardiovascular diseases. Contrast use may cause nephropathy, especially in diabetic patients. SGLT2 inhibitors have strong cardioprotective and renal protective effects. In our study, we investigated the effectiveness of this drug group in preventing the development of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy (CIN). Materials and Methods: The results of 312 diabetic patients who underwent CAG were analyzed. The study group included 104 DM patients using SGLT2 and the control group did not use SGLT2. These groups were compared with each other in terms of clinical, demographic, and laboratory parameters. Results: The groups were similar characteristics. However, post-CAG creatinine values compared with before the procedure, the development of CIN was observed to be significantly less in the group using SGLT2 inhibitor (p = 0.03). When the results of the multivariate analysis were examined, it was seen that the use of SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of CIN (odds ratio (OR): 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0,142-0.966, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Our study showed that SGLT2 inhibitors may be protective against the development of CIN, especially in patients with comorbid conditions such as diabetes.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Diabetes Mellitus , Kidney Diseases , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors , Humans , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography , Diabetes Mellitus/etiology , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Risk Factors , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
12.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 101(6): 1014-1027, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36923997

ABSTRACT

Clinical outcomes after non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in patients with (symptom-to-door time [SDT] ≥ 24 h) or without (SDT < 24 h) delayed hospitalization among patients with or without diabetes were compared. From the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health, a total of 4517 patients with NSTEMI who underwent new-generation drug-eluting stents implantation were recruited and they were classified into the diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-DM groups. These two groups were subdivided into groups with and without delayed hospitalization. The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, repeat coronary revascularization, and stroke. The secondary clinical outcome was the occurrence of individual components of MACCE and stent thrombosis. Although after multivariable and propensity score-adjusted analyses in the DM group, the primary and secondary clinical outcomes between the SDT < 24 h and SDT ≥ 24 h groups were similar; in the non-DM group, all-cause (p = 0.003 and p = 0.007, respectively) and cardiac (p = 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively) death rates were significantly higher in the SDT ≥ 24 h group than in the SDT < 24 h group. Our results suggested that there was no significant difference in prognosis between diabetic patients with and without delayed SDT, but delayed SDT was associated with poor prognosis in nondiabetic patients.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Drug-Eluting Stents , Myocardial Infarction , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology
13.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(2): e32629, 2023 Jan 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36637929

ABSTRACT

The triglyceride glucose (TyG) index is an indicator of insulin resistance and associated with increased risk of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular events. Our study investigates the correlation between TyG index and contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) in non-diabetic patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). 350 non-diabetic NSTEMI patients (183, 52.3% male) undergoing PCI were retrospectively enrolled. The enrolled cohort was divided into 2 groups based on the calculated TyG index, namely values < 8.65 or higher. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine > 25% or 0.5 mg/dL from baseline in the first 48 to 72 hours after PCI. A total of 56 (16%) cases of CIN were diagnosed. In contrast to patients with lower TyG indexes, patients with higher TyG indexes (≥8.65) had a higher frequency of CIN, 9.5%. versus 20.8% respectively (P .004). Patients with CIN also had higher TyG indexes (8.74 ±â€…0.12 vs 8.67 ±â€…0.11, P < .001). In addition, TyG index, age, and glomerular filtration rate were identified as independent risk factors for CIN in logistic regression model (OR: 2.5 CI: 1.3-4.6, P .006, OR: 1.0 CI: 1.0-1.1, P < .001, OR: 1.0 KI: 1.03-1.06, P .025). In the ROC analysis, the area under the curve predictive of CIN was 0.666 (P < .001, 95% [CI] 0.58-0.75) with a cutoff value of 8.69 (sensitivity 71,4%, specificity 55.1%) TyG index. Higher TyG indexes are associated with an increased risk of CIN in non-diabetic patients with NSTEMI.


Subject(s)
Kidney Diseases , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Male , Female , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Glucose , Triglycerides , Retrospective Studies , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Kidney Diseases/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Risk Assessment
14.
Int J Cardiol ; 370: 447-453, 2023 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36356695

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We sought to assess the clinical impact of Covid-19 infection on mortality in patients with Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) admitted during the national outbreak in Italy. METHODS: We analysed a nationwide, comprehensive, and universal administrative database of consecutive NSTEMI patients admitted during lockdown for Covid-19 infection (March,11st - May 3rd, 2020) and the equivalent periods of the previous 5 years in Italy. The observed rate of 30-day and 6-month all-cause mortality of NSTEMI patients with and without Covid-19 infection during the lockdown was compared with the expected rate of death according to the trend of the previous 5 years. RESULTS: During the period of observation, 48.447 NSTEMI hospitalizations occurred in Italy. Among these, 4981 NSTEMI patients were admitted during the 2020 outbreak: 173 (3.5%) with and 4808 (96.5%) without a Covid-19 diagnosis. According to the 5-year trend, the 2020 expected rate of 30-day and 6-month all-cause mortality was 6.5% and 12.2%, while the observed incidence of death was 8.3% (p = 0.001) and 13.6% (p = 0.041), respectively. Excluding NSTEMI patients with a Covid-19 diagnosis, the 6-month mortality rate resulted in accordance with the prior 5-year trend. After multiple corrections, the presence of Covid-19 diagnosis resulted one of the independent predictors of all-cause mortality at 30 days [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.3; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.90-6.23; p < 0.0001] and 6 months (adjusted OR 3.5; 95% CI: 2.43-5.03; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: During the 2020 national outbreak in Italy, a concomitant diagnosis of Covid-19 in NSTEMI was associated with a significantly higher rate of mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Myocardial Infarction , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , Communicable Disease Control , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
15.
Am J Cardiol ; 188: 95-101, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36493607

ABSTRACT

In patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), total occlusion of the culprit coronary artery (OCA) is not uncommon. We sought to determine the frequency and clinical impact of OCA at presentation in a large population of patients presenting with NSTEMI and who underwent systematic early invasive management. We performed a post hoc analysis of the TAO (Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome with Otamixaban) randomized trial, which included patients with NSTEMI with systematic coronary angiography within 72 hours. We compared the baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients according to whether the culprit vessel was occluded (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade [TFG] 0 to 1) or patent (TFG 2 to 3) at presentation. A total of 7,473 patients with NSTEMI with only 1 culprit lesion identified were enrolled, of whom 1,702 patients had OCA (22.8%). In the OCA group, coronary angiography was performed earlier (18 ± 15 vs 20 ± 16 hours, p <0.01), the culprit lesion was less likely to be the left anterior descending artery (26.5% vs 41.4%, p <0.001) but with more frequent angiographic thrombus (49.9% vs 22.7%, p <0.01). Culprit artery percutaneous coronary intervention during the index procedure was also more frequent (88.5% vs 78.1%, p <0.001) but with a lower rate of TFG grade 3 after the procedure and higher subsequent peak troponin I levels (8.3 ± 13.6 µg/L vs 5.6 ± 11.9 µg/L, p <0.001). At day 7, patients with OCA had higher mortality, and this persisted after adjustment on gender, Grace risk score, cardiovascular risk factors, and culprit vessel location (0.9% vs 0.4%, p = 0.02; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23 to 5.29, p = 0.01). The absolute difference of mortality was maintained through 30 days: 1.2% versus 0.8%, p = 0.13; OR: 1.72, 95% CI 0.97 to 3.05, but mortality rates were similar by 180 days: 1.5% versus 1.6%, p = 0.8, adjusted OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.80, p = 0.66. In conclusion, a significant proportion of patients with NSTEMI have a totally occluded culprit vessel at presentation. These patients are at higher risk of early mortality but not at 6 months.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Clinical Relevance , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/methods , Treatment Outcome
16.
Heart Lung ; 57: 124-129, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36183629

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) recommend Intensive Care Unit (ICU) surveillance during the first 24-48 h. Interestingly, the in-hospital mortality of NSTEMI patients has consistently decreased, giving some patients the option to be managed in general hospital wards. The ACTION ICU score has been proposed to identify high-risk patients with NSTEMI and guide the selective risk-based need for ICU care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of the ACTION ICU score to predict patients' risk of developing complications requiring ICU care in a Latin-American cohort with NSTEMI. METHODS: We applied the ACTION ICU score in a retrospective cohort. A composite primary outcome included: cardiorespiratory arrest, shock, high-grade atrio-ventricular block, respiratory failure, stroke, or death. The predictive performance of this model was estimated with a conditional multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 1,062 patients with NSTEMI, the primary outcome was present in 75 patients (7.1%), and 1,019 (96%) were admitted to ICU. The most common event was respiratory failure (4.0%), followed by cardiogenic shock (3.7%), and cardiac arrest (1.7%). The presence of heart failure signs or symptoms had the highest association with the primary outcome (OR:2.16; 95%CI:1.61-2.92). The best cut-off point for this population was 3 (complications risk: 4.0%, SEN:96%, SP:15.4%, NPV:98.1%, PPV:7.9%). CONCLUSION: The ACTION ICU score may be a promising tool to identify the need for ICU care in Latin-American patients with NSTEMI. Furthermore, additional research is needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this strategy.


Subject(s)
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Respiratory Insufficiency , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Intensive Care Units , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects
17.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(30): e29596, 2022 Jul 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35905280

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) resulted in a marked decrease in the number of patient visits for acute myocardial infarction and delayed patient response and intervention in several countries. This study evaluated the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of patients, patient response time (pain-to-door), and intervention time (door-to-balloon) for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Patients with STEMI or NSTEMI visiting a hospital in South Korea who underwent primary coronary intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic (January 29, 2020, to December 31, 2020) were compared with those in the equivalent period from 2018 to 2019. Patient response and intervention times were compared for the COVID-19 pandemic window (2020) and the equivalent period from 2018 to 2019. We observed no decrease in the number of patients with STEMI (P = .88) and NSTEMI (P = 1.00) during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to that in the previous years. Patient response times (STEMI: P = .39; NSTEMI: P = .59) during the overall COVID-19 pandemic period did not differ significantly. However, we identified a significant decrease in door-to-balloon time among patients with STEMI (14%; P < .01) during the early COVID-19 pandemic. We found that the number of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI was consistent during the COVID-19 pandemic and that no time delays in patient response and intervention occurred. However, the door-to-balloon time among patients with STEMI significantly reduced during the early COVID-19 pandemic, which could be attributed to decreased emergency care utilization during the early pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Myocardial Infarction , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Pandemics , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/etiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
18.
Can J Cardiol ; 38(12): 1935-1943, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35850384

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an important cause of myocardial infarction (MI). However, the role of revascularization for SCAD according to presentation remains unclear. METHODS: We analyzed patients with SCAD who presented acutely and were participating in the Canadian SCAD Cohort Study. We compared revascularization strategy and clinical outcomes (in-hospital major adverse events and major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE] including recurrent MI at 1-year) in patients with SCAD presenting with ST-elevation MI (STEMI) vs unstable angina or non-STEMI (UA-NSTEMI). RESULTS: Among 750 patients with SCAD (mean 51.7 ± 10.5years; 88.5% were women; median follow-up was 373 days), 234 (31.2%) presented with STEMI. More patients with SCAD-STEMI (27.8%) were treated with revascularization (98.5% percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) compared with 8.7% of patients with UA-NSTEMI (93.3% PCI). For patients with SCAD and STEMI, 93.9% were planned procedures vs 71.1% for UA-NSTEMI. Successful or partially successful PCI was 65.5% for STEMI and 76.9% for UA-NSTEMI (P < 0.001). In revascularized patients, 1-year MACE was not different between STEMI and UA-NSTEMI. Revascularization was associated with higher in-hospital major adverse events and its association was more prominent in UA-NSTEMI (STEMI: 26.2% vs 10.7%, P < 0.001; UA-NSTEMI: 37.8% vs 3.6%, P < 0.001). The difference in adverse events according to revascularization diminished over time and was not evident at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher in-hospital events with revascularization in patients with SCAD, and higher revascularization with SCAD-STEMI, 1-year MACE was not different compared with UA-NSTEMI. This is reassuring, as revascularization may be required for ongoing ischemia at the time of initial presentation in STEMI-SCAD, and emphasizes the need for careful patient selection for revascularization in UA-NSTEMI.


Subject(s)
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Female , Male , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/surgery , Cohort Studies , Canada/epidemiology , Angina, Unstable/diagnosis , Angina, Unstable/etiology , Angina, Unstable/surgery , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/etiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Treatment Outcome
19.
Kardiologiia ; 62(3): 40-48, 2022 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35414360

ABSTRACT

Aim    The objective was to assess the correlation of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c, and the duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with SYNTAX score (SS) II in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).Material and methods    FPG and HbA1C were measured in 398 patients presenting with NSTEMI at admission. SS II was calculated using an online calculator. Patients were stratified according to SS II (≤21.5, 21.5-30.6, and ≥30.6), defined as SS II low, mid, and high, respectively.Results    37.7 % of subjects were diabetic. Correlations of FPG (R=0.402, R2=0.162, p<0.001) and HbA1c (R=0.359, R2=0.129, p<0.001) with SS II were weak in the overall population. Duration of T2DM showed very strong correlation with SS II (R=0.827, R2=0.347). For the prediction of high SS II in the study population, FPG≥98.5 mg / dl demonstrated a sensitivity of 58 % and a specificity of 60 %, and HbA1c ≥6.05 demonstrated a sensitivity of 63 % and a specificity of 69 %. Duration of T2DM (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.182; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.185-2.773) and FPG (OR: 0.987; 95 % CI: 0.976-0.9959) were significantly associated with high SS II after controlling for other risk factors. Duration of T2DM (Beta=0.439) contributed strongly to variance of SS II, whereas HbA1c (Beta=0.063) contributed weakly.Conclusion    Duration of T2DM is a very important risk factor for severity of coronary artery disease.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Blood Glucose , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Glycated Hemoglobin , Humans , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Risk Factors
20.
Clin Cardiol ; 45(4): 359-369, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35266561

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]) has recommended immediate (<2 h) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in very-high risk patients and early (<24 h) PCI in high-risk patients. HYPOTHESIS: To examine the ESC NSTEMI guidelines adherence in a nationwide survey in Israel using the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS). We hypothesized that adherence to the guidlines' recommnded PCI timing in NSTEMI pateints will be inadequate, partly due to the inconsistent evidence regarding its effect on clinical outcomes. METHODS: All NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI during the ACSIS surveys in 2016 and 2018 were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Out of 1793 NSTEMI patients, 1643 (92%) patients underwent PCI, and door to balloon time was documented in 1078 of them. One hundred and fifty-six (14.5%) patients and 922 (85.5%) patients were defined as very high-risk and high-risk NSTEMI patients, respectively. Of the very high-risk NSTEMI patients, only 10 (6.4%) underwent immediate coronary angiography, and 50 (32.1%) underwent early coronary angiography. Acute heart failure 139 (89.1%) was the main reason for including NSTEMI patients in the very high-risk category. Of the high-risk patients, early coronary angiography was performed in only 405 (43.9%) patients. Patients in whom coronary angiography was postponed were older and had more comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Despite guidelines recommendations for immediate and early PCI in very high-risk and high-risk NSTEMI patients, respectively, most patients do not undergo immediate or early PCI according to contemporary guidelines. Further studies are needed to better understand the reasons for guidelines' nonadherence in those high-risk patients.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/surgery , Coronary Angiography , Humans , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...