Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 183
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0260065, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34793518

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Occupational welding fumes contain varieties of toxic metal particles and may affect cardiovascular system like the Particulate Matters (PM). Few studies have focused on the effects of toxic metals on the hemodynamic balance; however, the reporting results were not consistent. This study aimed to investigate the association between toxic metals exposure (Chromium (Cr), Manganese (Mn) and Lead (Pb)) and blood hemostatic parameters status after a 3-week exposure cessation among workers exposed to welding fumes. METHODOLOGY: Structured interviews and biological samplings were conducted for 86 male workers without a history of Anemia and Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and working in a confined space to construct crude oil tanks. Metal levels of Cr, Mn and Pb in urine were measured during the working days using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS) method. The concentrations of hemostatic proteins in blood (White blood cell counts (WBC), Lymphocytes, Monocyte, Eosinophil, Neutrophil, Hematocrit (Hct) were assessed after a 3 weeks exposure cessation. Workers were divided into groups based on occupation type (welder group and non-welder group), and based on metal levels (high and low exposure groups) for comparison. Linear regression models were used to explore the association between metal exposure and multiple blood hemostatic parameters adjusted for age, Body Mass Index (BMI), and smoking status. RESULTS: Urine Mn and Cr level of the welder group was significantly higher than the non-welder group (Mn: 0.96 VS 0.22 ug/g creatinine, p < 0.001; Cr: 0.63 VS 0.22 ug/g creatinine, p < 0.01). The mean value of Hct in the welder group was 44.58 ± 2.84 vol%, significantly higher than the non-welder group (43.07 ± 3.31 vol%, p = 0.026). The median value of WBC in the high Mn-exposed group (6.93 ± 1.59 X 106 Cell/ml) was significantly lower than the low Mn-exposed group (7.90 ± 2.13 X 106 Cell/ml, p = 0.018). The linear regression analyses showed that there was a significantly negative association between log transformed WBC value and the Mn exposure groups (high and low) after adjusting for age, BMI, and smoking status (ß = - 0.049, p = 0.045), but no significant result was found between WBC and occupation types (welder and non-welder) (p > 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis also showed positive association between Hct and occupational types (welder and non-welders) (ß = 0.014, p = 0.055). The other hemostatic parameters were not different from controls when divided by occupation type or metal level groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that welders were exposed to about 3 to 4 times higher Mn and Cr concentrations than non-welders. Moreover, one third of the non-welders were exposed to high-exposure groups of Mn and Cr metals. Regression models revealed a significant association of the WBC counts with the Mn exposure group. Therefore, we infer that Mn exposure may play a significant role on the blood hemostatic parameters of workers in the confined space. Hazard identification for non-welders should also be conducted in the confined space.


Subject(s)
Gas Poisoning/epidemiology , Metal Workers , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Chromium/blood , Chromium/toxicity , Confined Spaces , Eosinophils , Gases/toxicity , Hematocrit , Hemodynamics , Hemostatics/toxicity , Humans , Lead/blood , Lead/toxicity , Leukocyte Count , Manganese/blood , Manganese/toxicity , Monocytes , Neutrophils , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Exposure/economics , Thailand , Welding
2.
PLoS One ; 16(3): e0248258, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33788856

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Every major federal regulation in the United States requires an economic analysis estimating its benefits and costs. Benefit-cost analyses related to regulations on formaldehyde exposure have not included asthma in part due to lack of clarity in the strength of the evidence. OBJECTIVES: 1) To conduct a systematic review of evidence regarding human exposure to formaldehyde and diagnosis, signs, symptoms, exacerbations, or other measures of asthma in humans; and 2) quantify the annual economic benefit for decreases in formaldehyde exposure. METHODS: We developed and registered a protocol in PROSPERO (Record ID #38766, CRD 42016038766). We conducted a comprehensive search of articles published up to April 1, 2020. We evaluated potential risk of bias for included studies, identified a subset of studies to combine in a meta-analysis, and rated the overall quality and strength of the evidence. We quantified economics benefit to children from a decrease in formaldehyde exposure using assumptions consistent with EPA's proposed formaldehyde rule. RESULTS: We screened 4,821 total references and identified 150 human studies that met inclusion criteria; of these, we focused on 90 studies reporting asthma status of all participants with quantified measures of formaldehyde directly relevant to our study question. Ten studies were combinable in a meta-analysis for childhood asthma diagnosis and five combinable for exacerbation of childhood asthma (wheezing and shortness of breath). Studies had low to probably-low risk of bias across most domains. A 10-µg/m3 increase in formaldehyde exposure was associated with increased childhood asthma diagnosis (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: [1.02, 1.41]). We also found a positive association with exacerbation of childhood asthma (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: [0.92, 1.28]). The overall quality and strength of the evidence was rated as "moderate" quality and "sufficient" for asthma diagnosis and asthma symptom exacerbation in both children and adults. We estimated that EPA's proposed rule on pressed wood products would result in 2,805 fewer asthma cases and total economic benefit of $210 million annually. CONCLUSION: We concluded there was "sufficient evidence of toxicity" for associations between exposure to formaldehyde and asthma diagnosis and asthma symptoms in both children and adults. Our research documented that when exposures are ubiquitous, excluding health outcomes from benefit-cost analysis can underestimate the true benefits to health from environmental regulations.


Subject(s)
Asthma/chemically induced , Formaldehyde/adverse effects , Asthma/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/economics , Formaldehyde/economics , Formaldehyde/toxicity , Humans , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/economics
3.
Arch. prev. riesgos labor. (Ed. impr.) ; 24(1): 62-73, ene.-mar. 2021. graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-197121

ABSTRACT

La comercialización del amianto en Europa de la segunda mitad del siglo XX supuso un consumo de millones de toneladas. La exposición laboral se ha controlado a partir de la Directiva de 2009 y, en la actualidad, mediante vigilancia epidemiológica, se registran las patologías, mesoteliomas fundamentalmente, por exposiciones pasadas. Después de prohibida su utilización, aún permanecen cantidades ingentes en edificios, infraestructuras y vehículos, entre otros. El camino hacia su eliminación se inició con una Resolución del Parlamento Europeo, de 2013 y el Dictamen del Comité Económico y Social Europeo (2015/C 251/03). Con el objetivo de conocer las dificultades de estos planes se ha revisado el de Polonia, único país que hasta la fecha, ha implementado un plan de acción con un gran respaldo financiero y las actuaciones llevadas a cabo en relación con la exposición a amianto en España y, Navarra en concreto por contar con un registro exhaustivo de trabajadores expuestos. El enorme esfuerzo económico que precisan estos planes y los riesgos medioambientales que suponen, merecen una precisa planificación, que exige conocer el no alcance hasta la fecha actual de los objetivos planteados en Polonia, país referente


The commercialization of asbestos in Europe in the second half of the 20th century translated into consumption of millions of tons of this material. Occupational exposure to asbestos is controlled under the 2009 European Union Directive. Currently, through epidemiological surveillance and pathology registries (mainly mesotheliomas), it is possible to record past exposures. Despite prohibiting its use, large amounts of asbestos remain in buildings, infrastructures and vehicles, among others. The road to elimination of existing asbestos began with a 2013 European Parliament Resolution and the Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (2015 / C 251/03). To better understand barriers to implementing these plans, we reviewed the experience in Poland the only country that to date has implemented an action plan with great financial support, together with actions carried out in Spain generally, and Navarre specifically, given the latter's exhaustive registry of exposed workers. The enormous economic effort required to implement these plans, along with the environmental risks associated with asbestos abatement, require detailed planning, which should consider understanding why the objectives set by Poland, a benchmark country, have not been achieved to date


Subject(s)
Humans , Asbestos , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Asbestos/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/economics , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Program Evaluation , Poland , Spain
4.
Anaesthesia ; 76(5): 617-622, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33470422

ABSTRACT

Disposable N95 respirator masks are the current standard for healthcare worker respiratory protection in the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to shortages, qualitative fit testing can have low sensitivity for detecting poor fit, leading to inconsistent protection. Multiple groups have developed alternative solutions such as modified snorkel masks to overcome these limitations, but validation of these solutions has been lacking. We sought to determine if N95s and snorkel masks with attached high-efficiency filters provide consistent protection levels in healthcare workers and if the addition of positive pressure via an inexpensive powered-air purifying respirator to the snorkel mask would provide enhanced protection. Fifty-one healthcare workers who were qualitatively fitted with N95 masks underwent quantitative mask fit testing according to a simulated workplace exercise protocol. N95, snorkel masks with high-efficiency filters and snorkel masks with powered-air purifying respirators were tested. Respiratory filtration ratios were collected for each step and averaged to obtain an overall workplace protocol fit factor. Failure was defined as either an individual filtration ratio or an overall fit factor below 100. N95s and snorkel masks with high-efficiency filters failed one or more testing steps in 59% and 20% of participants, respectively, and 24% and 12% failed overall fit factors, respectively. The snorkel masks with powered-air purifying respirators had zero individual or overall failures. N95 and snorkel masks with high-efficiency filter respirators were found to provide inconsistent respiratory protection in healthcare workers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Cost-Benefit Analysis/standards , Health Personnel/standards , Masks/standards , N95 Respirators/standards , Adult , COVID-19/economics , Cohort Studies , Equipment Design/economics , Equipment Design/standards , Female , Health Personnel/economics , Humans , Male , Masks/economics , Middle Aged , N95 Respirators/economics , Occupational Exposure/economics , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment/economics , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results
5.
Endoscopy ; 53(2): 156-161, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33080647

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infection prevention strategies to protect healthcare workers in endoscopy units during the post-peak phase of the COVID-19 pandemic are currently under intense discussion. In this paper, the cost-effectiveness of routine pre-endoscopy testing and high risk personal protective equipment (PPE) is addressed. METHOD: A model based on theoretical assumptions of 10 000 asymptomatic patients presenting to a high volume center was created. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and absolute costs per endoscopy were calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: ICER values for universal testing decreased with increasing prevalence rates. For higher prevalence rates (≥ 1 %), ICER values were lowest for routine pre-endoscopy testing coupled with use of high risk PPE, while cost per endoscopy was lowest for routine use of high risk PPE without universal testing. CONCLUSION: In general, routine pre-endoscopy testing combined with high risk PPE becomes more cost-effective with rising prevalence rates of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Endoscopy/economics , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Infection Control/economics , Occupational Exposure/economics , Pandemics
6.
Front Public Health ; 8: 590275, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33330335

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has laid bare the inadequacy of the U.S. healthcare system to deliver timely and resilient care. According to the American Hospital Association, the pandemic has created a $202 billion loss across the healthcare industry, forcing health care systems to lay off workers and making hospitals scramble to minimize supply chain costs. However, as the demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) grows, hospitals have sacrificed sustainable solutions for disposable options that, although convenient, will exacerbate supply strains, financial burden, and waste. We advocate for reusable gowns as a means to lower health care costs, address climate change, and improve resilience while preserving the safety of health care workers. Reusable gowns' polyester material provides comparable capacity to reduce microbial cross-transmission and liquid penetration. In addition, previous hospitals have reported a 50% cost reduction in gown expenditures after adopting reusable gowns; given the current 2000% price increase in isolation gowns during COVID-19, reusable gown use will build both healthcare resilience and security from price fluctuations. Finally, with the United States' medical waste stream worsening, reusable isolation gowns show promising reductions in energy and water use, solid waste, and carbon footprint. The gowns are shown to withstand laundering 75-100 times in contrast to the single-use disposable gown. The circumstances of the pandemic forewarn the need to shift our single-use PPE practices to standardized reusable applications. Ultimately, sustainable forms of protective equipment can help us prepare for future crises that challenge the resilience of the healthcare system.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Disposable Equipment/economics , Equipment Reuse/economics , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control/economics , Pandemics/prevention & control , Protective Clothing/economics , Adult , Disposable Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Reuse/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/economics , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Protective Clothing/statistics & numerical data , United States
7.
S Afr Med J ; 110(5): 389-395, 2020 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32657723

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Given the elevated risk of tuberculosis (TB), including drug-resistant disease, experienced by health workers in South Africa (SA), effective workers' compensation for occupational TB is a legal right and an essential social benefit. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the experience of the workers' compensation system among health workers who suffered from TB while working in public service facilities in Western Cape Province, SA. METHODS: In this case series with a qualitative component, 300 claims for occupational TB in health workers were sampled from the provincial health department database of claims submitted. Claim status for each case was ascertained. An attempt was made to contact each health worker for a telephonic interview consisting of both closed- and open-ended (qualitative) questions. Fifty-one interviews were completed. RESULTS: In nearly half of the cases, there was no record of claim status on the state Compensation Fund website. Of the 51 interviewees, only one had received all the compensation benefits for their particular claim circumstances. Health workers' experience of having their cases reported for compensation purposes was marred by perception of poor communication and administration. The experience of contracting TB was further characterised by surprise, perceptions of stigma, financial burden and ongoing ill-health. CONCLUSIONS: Affected health workers' experience of the workers' compensation system was mostly negative, adding to the burden of being ill with TB. Education of management and clinicians, improvement in communication, and timeous and regular checking of claim status and of payment of applicable compensation are required at the provincial level. Dedicated facility-based occupational health units are needed, with a staff complement of knowledgeable persons trusted by their colleagues. However, the effectiveness of the system is ultimately dependent on the ability of the Compensation Fund to register and display claims timeously and administer compensation expeditiously.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Exposure/economics , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , South Africa/epidemiology , Workers' Compensation/economics
8.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem ; 28: e3278, 2020.
Article in English, Portuguese, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32578749

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to compare the direct cost, from the perspective of the Unified Health System, of assessing the post-vaccination serological status with post-exposure management for hepatitis B among health care workers exposed to biological material. METHOD: cross-sectional study and cost-related, based on accident data recorded in the System of Information on Disease Notification between 2006 and 2016, where three post-exposure and one pre-exposure management scenarios were evaluated: A) accidents among vaccinated workers with positive and negative serological status tests for hepatitis B, exposed to known and unknown source-person; B) handling unvaccinated workers exposed to a known and unknown source-person; C) managing vaccinated workers and unknown serological status for hepatitis B and D) cost of the pre-exposure post-vaccination test. Accidents were assessed and the direct cost was calculated using the decision tree model. RESULTS: scenarios where workers did not have protective titles after vaccination or were unaware of the serological status and were exposed to a positive or unknown source-person for hepatitis B. CONCLUSION: the direct cost of hepatitis B prophylaxis, including confirmation of serological status after vaccination would be more economical for the health system.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood , Hepatitis B Vaccines/economics , Hepatitis B virus/immunology , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/economics , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Personnel/economics , Hepatitis B/economics , Humans , Male , Vaccination/economics
10.
Value Health ; 23(1): 89-95, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31952677

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Livestock-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) is a concern in healthcare and a political priority in some countries. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the net societal costs of 2 alternative strategies for controlling LA-MRSA in Denmark: (1) eradicating LA-MRSA in all pig housing units, and (2) containing LA-MRSA within the units. METHODS: Benefits and costs are considered for affected economic sectors: healthcare, pig production, pig-related industries, and public administration. RESULTS: The cost to society of eradication is estimated at €2.3 to €2.5 billion (present value). Containment will cost €55 to €93 million. For both strategies, the main cost lies in primary pig production-for containment this is mainly due to establishing and operating anterooms and shower rooms, and for eradication it is due to production losses, loss of genetic resources, and costs of cleaning and disinfection. CONCLUSION: Compared with these costs, health economic benefits are moderate for both strategies. Containment is superior to eradication when measured by a benefit-cost ratio.


Subject(s)
Containment of Biohazards/veterinary , Disease Eradication/economics , Health Care Costs , Housing, Animal , Infection Control/economics , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary , Swine Diseases , Swine/microbiology , Zoonoses , Animals , Containment of Biohazards/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Denmark , Humans , Occupational Exposure/economics , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/economics , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Swine Diseases/economics , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , Swine Diseases/transmission , Zoonoses/economics , Zoonoses/microbiology , Zoonoses/prevention & control
11.
Work ; 64(1): 107-116, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31450534

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A considerable amount of money is invested annually in workplaces to promote creative, comfortable and safe work environments. The processes and effects of these investments are however not sufficiently studied. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to examine work environment investment processes and identify organizational critical elements for optimizing investment in terms of occupational health and safety effects for employees. METHODS: Twelve case studies were conducted in different sectors. The data was collected through interviews, by studying available documents, and, in several cases, observations and measurement of hazards by means of the PIMEX-method. RESULTS: The empirical results yielded seven different critical elements for work environment investment processes. The critical elements identified were: identifying the need, risk assessment, involvement of staff, consultation with OHS expertise, procurement and delivery, implementation and training of workers, and evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The critical elements have wide similarities with steps outlined in Swedish Work Environment Management processes, and ideas described in the Plan-Do-Act-Check model. If organizations follow this process, they are provided with improved possibilities for maximizing invested money for a safer working environment.


Subject(s)
Occupational Health/economics , Workplace/economics , Accidents, Occupational/economics , Accidents, Occupational/prevention & control , Humans , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/economics , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Organizational Case Studies , Risk Assessment , Safety/economics , Workplace/psychology
12.
J Agromedicine ; 24(4): 333-340, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31352877

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The study objective was to estimate a denominator of exposure to inshore lobstering in Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs), to count incident injury data from a sample cohort of this population, to use this count to calculate rates for incident injuries, and to use official counts of fatalities to estimate a fatality rate.Methods: Captains were randomly selected from those licensed to fish in Maine and Massachusetts. Data on work exposure and injuries that occurred on the boat were collected using a survey that was administered once per season via phone or face-to-face interview with the captain. Data included self-reports of the number of weeks worked during the season, average crew size, number of trips per week, and average trip length in hours. In addition, this survey captured relevant information (body segment affected, type of injury, and whether treatment was received) on all acute injuries occurring during the season. Only data on acute injuries were collected, and defined as having newly occurred within the last 3 months. Counts of fatalities were obtained from an official surveillance database at the National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety.Results: The total occupational exposure reported for the cohort was over 2 million man-hours over 4 years, resulting in an average annual FTE of 5,847. The fatality rate averaged over 4 years was 21/100,000 FTE. The incidence rates for all injuries (51.0/100 FTE) and injuries receiving treatment (17.5/100 FTE) were much higher than those reported in other studies of fishing that used US Coast Guard data. Lobstermen presented with all categories of injuries, sprains being the most frequent (7.8/100 FTE) and amputations the least (0.2/100 FTE). Wrist/hand injuries on the right side occurred most frequently of all body locations (3.6/100 FTE).Conclusion: Non-fatal injuries occur at high rates in lobstering. The impact of interventions aimed at exposure to risk for sprains and cuts has potential to affect the most lobstermen. Fatality rate appears to have been unchanging since the year 2000.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Fisheries/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Occupational/economics , Accidents, Occupational/psychology , Adult , Animals , Cohort Studies , Employment , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Maine/epidemiology , Male , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Nephropidae/growth & development , Occupational Exposure/economics , Occupational Health , Occupational Injuries/economics , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Injuries/psychology , Time Factors , Young Adult
13.
Phys Ther ; 99(2): 183-193, 2019 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31222334

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient/resident-handling tasks are physically demanding and associated with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among nursing personnel. The routine performance of such tasks by physical therapists and occupational therapists during treatment can cause similar problems. OBJECTIVE: This study characterized the magnitude of MSDs and the risk factors for MSDs in physical therapists, occupational therapists, physical therapist assistants, and occupational therapist assistants (collectively called "therapy personnel" for this study) and compared them with those of other nursing home workers, especially nursing staff. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. METHODS: Workers' compensation claim (WCC) data from 1 year of experience in a long-term care company were used to compute claim rates by body region, nature, and cause of injury, and the costs per case and per full-time-equivalent employee. Data regarding musculoskeletal symptoms, use of patient/resident-lifting equipment, and perceived physical and psychological job demands were obtained from a concurrent cross-sectional survey of workers from 24 long-term care facilities. RESULTS: About 80% of the WCCs were related to musculoskeletal incidents in nursing aides and therapy personnel. WCC costs paid per case for therapy personnel were more than twice those for nursing staff for both ergonomic and resident-handling incidents. Prevalence of low back pain in therapy personnel was the same as in nursing aides (48%) but involved more chronic, milder pain. About half of therapy personnel reported "never" or "rarely" using patient/resident-lifting equipment. Therapy personnel, nursing aides, and housekeeping/dietary/maintenance personnel reported the highest physical job demands. LIMITATIONS: Causal inference cannot be determined due to the cross-sectional nature of the survey data. Study findings are relevant only to therapy work in long-term care settings because exposures vary in other health care settings (hospitals, outpatient, and others). CONCLUSIONS: MSD prevalence and claim costs in therapy personnel are high enough to deserve more attention. The low use of patient/resident-lifting equipment in therapy could increase the risk for MSDs. Future studies with comprehensive ergonomic analysis of therapist tasks and recommendations to reduce injuries are warranted.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases/economics , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Therapists/statistics & numerical data , Physical Therapist Assistants/statistics & numerical data , Physical Therapists/statistics & numerical data , Workers' Compensation/economics , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Long-Term Care/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/economics , Risk Factors , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data , Workload/economics
14.
Eur J Public Health ; 29(5): 868-870, 2019 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30629239

ABSTRACT

We aimed to assess the predictivity of the biomechanical job-exposure matrix 'MADE' using compensation data from the National Health Insurance for work-related disorders. Data were obtained from 2013 to 2015, area under curves (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated using compensation results as reference. We collected 163 128 cases data. AUC ranged from 0.64 for shoulders disorder to 0.82 for knee disorders. If two thresholds were considered, 28.7% of the sample fit under or over those. The matrix showed a fair predictivity. Such matrix cannot replace expertise but might be a tool used for improving compensation process.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Workers' Compensation , Area Under Curve , France , Humans , Knee Injuries/economics , Knee Injuries/etiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/economics , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/economics , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Sensitivity and Specificity , Shoulder Injuries/economics , Shoulder Injuries/etiology , Workers' Compensation/economics , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data
15.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon ; 25(1): 138-147, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28862071

ABSTRACT

Work environment investments are important in order to create a healthy and safe workplace. This article presents findings from a seven-step interventions process aimed at examining and following-up work environment investments in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), with a particular focus on air contaminants. Three different cases were analyzed and included in the study: (a) an educational center for welding; (b) a paint station in furniture manufacturing; (c) a joinery in furniture manufacturing. The results show that the work environment investments were highly appreciated by the employees and managers, but at the same time the investment could be optimized through markedly decreased exposure levels for the worker. Factors such as follow-ups of the investment, education and training in how to use the equipment, worker involvement in the process and leadership engagement are important in order to optimize work environment investments.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Health/economics , Workplace , Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control , Humans , Interior Design and Furnishings , Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities , Occupational Exposure/economics , Paintings , Particulate Matter , Students , Welding , Wood
16.
Ann Ig ; 30(4 Supple 1): 48-51, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30062380

ABSTRACT

Exposure to pathogenic agents is a major occupational risk factor in healthcare facilities. The most common pathogenic agents are human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B and C viruses, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In Italy, about 70-80% of all cases of exposure to biological agents result from injuries caused by needles or other sharp instruments used during healthcare procedures. These accidents place a high economic burden on healthcare facilities. Indeed, each event is estimated to cost around € 375. Various studies have shown that the adoption of needlestick-prevention devices reduces occupational exposure to biological risk. At regulatory level, Italian Legislative Decrees 81/08 and 19/14 provide for measures to protect healthcare professionals from biological exposure to pathogenic agents.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Accidents, Occupational/economics , Accidents, Occupational/legislation & jurisprudence , Cross Infection/economics , Cross Infection/transmission , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/transmission , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis B/transmission , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Hepatitis C/transmission , Humans , Italy , Needlestick Injuries/complications , Needlestick Injuries/economics , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/economics , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Protective Devices , Risk Factors , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/prevention & control , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/transmission
17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29596345

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to estimate farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for health risk reductions of pesticide use by applying the contingent valuation method (CVM) and to explore the factors that influence farmers' WTP in China. In total, 244 farmers were randomly selected and interviewed. The mean WTP was estimated to be $65.38 (0.94% of total household income) per household per year for a 5/10,000 reduction in morbidity risk. This study shows that farmers' socioeconomic and attitudinal factors that significantly affect their WTP include farmers' farming income, education, household size and risk perceptions. In particular, the results demonstrate that respondents' social trust, social reciprocity and social networks have significant impacts on their WTP. The findings of this study can provide useful insights for policy makers to design effective policies to address health problems related to pesticide use in the developing world.


Subject(s)
Agriculture/economics , Farmers/psychology , Farmers/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Exposure/economics , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Pesticides/economics , Risk Reduction Behavior , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , China , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors
18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29337930

ABSTRACT

There was some limited use of asbestos at end of the 19th century in industrialized countries including Germany, but its consumption dramatically increased after World War II. The increase in use and exposure was followed by the discovery of high numbers of asbestos-related diseases with a mean latency period of about 38 years in Germany. The strong socio-political pressure from the asbestos industry, its affiliated scientists and physicians has successfully hindered regulatory measures and an asbestos ban for many years; a restrictive stance that is still being unravelled in compensation litigation. This national experience is compared with the situation in other industrialized countries and against the backdrop of the constant efforts of the WHO to eliminate asbestos-related diseases worldwide.


Subject(s)
Asbestos/toxicity , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Compensation and Redress , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/economics , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Politics
19.
Sante Publique ; 29(4): 509-524, 2017 Oct 02.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29034666

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the social cost of respiratory cancers attributable to occupational risk factors in France in 2010. METHODS: We estimated the number of cases of respiratory cancers attributable to each identified occupational risk factor according to the attributable fractions method. We also estimated direct (costs of hospital stays, drugs, outpatient care) and indirect costs (production losses) related to morbidity (absenteeism and presenteeism) and mortality (years of lost production). Production losses for paid work and unpaid domestic activities were taken into account. RESULTS: The social cost of respiratory cancers (lung, larynx, sinonasal, pleural mesothelioma) attributable to exposure to asbestos, chromium, diesel engine exhaust, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, painting occupations (unidentified carcinogen), crystalline silica, wood and leather dust in France in 2010 was estimated to be between €960 and 1,866 million. The cost of lung cancer represents between €804 and 1,617 million. The three risk factors with the greatest impact are asbestos (€530 to 890 million), diesel engine exhaust (€227 to 394 million), and crystalline silica (€116 to 268 million). CONCLUSION: These results provide a conservative estimate of the public health and economic burden of respiratory cancers attributable to occupational risk factors from a societal perspective.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/economics , Respiratory Tract Neoplasms/economics , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Neoplasms/chemically induced , Respiratory Tract Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...