[Minoxidil-induced ophthalmic hypertension (case report)]. / Indutsirovannaya minoksidilom oftal'mogipertenziya (klinicheskoe nablyudenie).

This article presents a case of a 31-year-old male patient who presented to the outpatient department of the Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases with complaints of diplopia and increased intraocular pressure (IOP) up to 30 mm Hg. The patient had been using minoxidil topically for androgenic alopecia for 8 years. On examination, mild swelling of the bulbar conjunctiva in the upper fornix was revealed; optical coherence tomography showed thinning of the ganglion cell layer, most likely due to moderate myopia. The patient responded well to discontinuation of minoxidil and topical therapy with prostaglandin analogues. After 4 months, an attempt was made to replace topical hypotensive therapy with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, but the previous hypotensive regimen had to be resumed due to an increase in IOP. During 10 months of observation, no signs of progression were detected according to optical coherence tomography and static perimetry.

Polygenic Risk Scores for Glaucoma Onset in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Importance: Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a highly heritable disease, with 127 identified risk loci to date. Polygenic risk score (PRS) may provide a clinically useful measure of aggregate genetic burden and improve patient risk stratification. Objective: To assess whether a PRS improves prediction of POAG onset in patients with ocular hypertension. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a post hoc analysis of the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Data were collected from 22 US sites with a mean (SD) follow-up of 14.0 (6.9) years. A total of 1636 participants were followed up from February 1994 to December 2008; 1077 participants were enrolled in an ancillary genetics study, of which 1009 met criteria for this analysis. PRS was calculated using summary statistics from the largest cross-ancestry POAG meta-analysis, with weights trained using 8 813 496 variants from 449 186 cross-ancestry participants in the UK Biobank. Data were analyzed from July 2022 to December 2023. Exposures: From February 1994 to June 2002, participants were randomized to either topical intraocular pressure-lowering medication or close observation. After June 2002, both groups received medication. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcome measures were hazard ratios for POAG onset. Concordance index and time-dependent areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used to compare the predictive performance of multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Of 1009 included participants, 562 (55.7%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 55.9 (9.3) years. The mean (SD) PRS was significantly higher for 350 POAG converters (0.24 [0.95]) compared with 659 nonconverters (-0.12 [1.00]) (P < .001). POAG risk increased 1.36% (95% CI, 1.08-1.64) with each higher PRS decile, with conversion ranging from 9.52% (95% CI, 7.09-11.95) in the lowest PRS decile to 21.81% (95% CI, 19.37-24.25) in the highest decile. Comparison of low-risk and high-risk PRS tertiles showed a 2.0-fold increase in 20-year POAG risk for participants of European and African ancestries. In the subgroup randomized to delayed treatment, each increase in PRS decile was associated with a 0.52-year (95% CI, 0.01-1.03) decrease in age at diagnosis (P = .047). No significant linear association between PRS and age at POAG diagnosis was present in the early treatment group. Prediction models significantly improved with the addition of PRS as a covariate (C index = 0.77) compared with the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study baseline model (C index = 0.75) (P < .001). Each 1-SD higher PRS conferred a mean hazard ratio of 1.25 (95% CI, 1.13-1.44) for POAG onset. Conclusions and Relevance: Higher PRS was associated with increased risk for POAG in patients with ocular hypertension. The inclusion of a PRS improved the prediction of POAG onset. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000125.

Comparison Between 24-2 ZEST and 24-2 ZEST FAST Strategies in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Using a Fundus Perimeter.

PRCIS: Using a Compass (CMP) (CMP, Centervue, Padova, Italy) fundus perimeter, Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (ZEST) FAST strategy showed a significant reduction in examination time compared with ZEST, with good agreement in the quantification of perimetric damage. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the test duration of ZEST strategy with ZEST FAST and to evaluate the test-retest variability of ZEST FAST strategy on patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study. We analyzed 1 eye of 60 subjects: 30 glaucoma patients and 30 patients with ocular hypertension. For each eye we analyzed, 3 visual field examinations were performed with Compass 24-2 grid: 1 test performed with ZEST strategy and 2 tests performed with ZEST FAST. Mean examination time and mean sensitivity between the 2 strategies were computed. ZEST FAST test-retest variability was examined. RESULTS: In the ocular hypertension cohort, test time was 223±29 seconds with ZEST FAST and 362±48 seconds with ZEST (38% reduction, P <0.001). In glaucoma patients, it was respectively 265±62 and 386±78 seconds (31% reduction using ZEST FAST, P <0.001). The difference in mean sensitivity between the 2 strategies was -0.24±1.30 dB for ocular hypertension and -0.14±1.08 dB for glaucoma. The mean difference in mean sensitivity between the first and the second test with ZEST FAST strategy was 0.2±0.8 dB for patients with ocular hypertension and 0.24±0.96 dB for glaucoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: ZEST FAST thresholding provides similar results to ZEST with a significantly reduced examination time.

Sensitivity and specificity of the uniform field electroretinogram in glaucoma detection in comparison to the pattern electroretinogram.

PURPOSE: To determine the ability of the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the uniform field electroretinogram (UF-ERG) to identify early glaucomatous changes in comparison to the checkerboard and bar stimuli of the pattern electroretinogram (PERG). METHODS: Forty-nine glaucoma patients were classified into two groups: glaucoma-suspect (23 eyes) and early to moderate glaucoma (30 eyes), based on their clinical examination and the results of standard automated perimetry. Thirty patients (30 eyes) with intraocular pressures (IOP) of 21 mmHg or less, with no history of reported high IOP, were included as controls. PERG and UF-ERG recordings were obtained on a Diagnosys D-341 Attaché-Envoy System. Visual field testing was done only for glaucoma-suspect and glaucoma patients. RESULTS: All three tests (PERG bar stimulus, PERG checkerboard stimulus and PhNR) displayed significantly prolonged peak times for glaucoma and glaucoma-suspect patients, with delays ranging from 7.8 to 14.8%, depending on the test. The PERG bar stimulus also showed a significantly lower N95 amplitude for both glaucoma groups (with reductions of 26.0% and 33.0% for glaucoma-suspect and glaucoma groups, respectively). The PERG checkerboard N95 amplitude component had high sensitivity for detecting glaucoma patients but a low specificity (97% and 37%, respectively; AUC = 0.61). Overall, the PhNR peak time showed the highest sensitivity and specificity (77% and 90%, respectively; AUC = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: PERG bar stimuli and the PhNR of the UF-ERG can be used in the clinical setting to detect glaucoma-related changes in glaucoma-suspect and glaucoma patients. However, our data confirm that the PhNR peak time has the best combined sensitivity and specificity.

Even-number measurement bias with Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma and glaucoma suspects.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Goldmann applanation tonometry is widely used for the diagnosis and management of glaucoma and its use is considered standard of care. However, the precision of this method may be reduced by a clinician tendency to round to even numbers. BACKGROUND: Studies have previously demonstrated an even-number measurement bias with Goldmann applanation tonometry during examination of a general patient population. Since it has not been determined whether this bias persists among glaucoma suspects and patients with glaucoma, further investigation was conducted. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a random sample from a large dataset of >69,000 patients seen during a six-year period at an urban, academic primary eye care service. Patients without suspicion of glaucoma, patients with a suspicion of glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma were selected who had Goldmann tonometry performed. Chart reviews were performed to confirm status, and even/odd-numbered Goldmann tonometry measurement frequencies were compared. RESULTS: The analysis included 961 controls, 506 glaucoma suspects, 159 ocular hypertensives not taking medication, and 314 patients taking medications who carried a diagnosis of glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Among controls the Goldmann tonometry even/odd digit proportions were 62.8%/37.2% (N = 961, p < 0.0001), and the even-number bias persisted among the other groups with specific even/odd distributions being 61.9%/38.1% (N = 506, p < 0.0001) for glaucoma suspects not taking medications, 66.0%/34.0% (N = 159, p < 0.0001) for ocular hypertensives not taking medications, and 64.3%/35.7% (N = 314, p < 0.0001) for glaucoma/ocular hypertension patients taking medications. CONCLUSION: An even-number measurement bias with Goldmann tonometry may be prevalent even when the examiner is aware of there being greater importance for intraocular pressure measurement accuracy.

The Use of Optical Coherence Tomography for Early Glaucoma Screening in a Population of Patients with Diabetes.

PURPOSE: The utility of screening for early diagnosis of glaucoma remains a widely debated topic in the care of ophthalmic patients. There are currently no population-based guidelines regarding screening for glaucoma. The purpose of this study is to determine the utility of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for early glaucoma screening in a population of diabetic patients. The results of this study may inform future screening practices. METHODS: The current study is a post hoc analysis of OCT data collected from diabetic patients screened for eye disease over 6 months. Glaucoma suspects (GS) were identified based on abnormal retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness on OCT. Fundus photographs of GS were graded by two independent raters for vertical cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) and other signs of glaucomatous changes. RESULTS: Of the 807 subjects screened, 50 patients (6.2%) were identified as GS. The mean RNFL thickness for GS was significantly lower than the mean RNFL in the total screening population (p < .001). Median CDR for GS was 0.44. Twenty-eight eyes of 17 GS were marked as having optic disc notching or rim thinning by at least one grader. Cohen's kappa statistic for inter-rater reliability was 0.85. Racial differences showed that mean CDR was significantly higher in non-whites (p < .001). Older age was associated with thinner RNFL (r = -0.29, p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that in a sample of diabetic patients, a small but clinically significant minority may be flagged as GS based on OCT. Nearly one-third of GS eyes were found to have glaucomatous changes on fundus photography by at least one grader. These results suggest screening with OCT may be useful in detecting early glaucomatous changes in high-risk populations, particularly older, non-white patients with diabetes.

MERCURY-3: a randomized comparison of netarsudil/latanoprost and bimatoprost/timolol in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE   : To compare the efficacy and safety of the fixed-dose combination (FDC) of netarsudil 0.02%/latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution (NET/LAT; Roclanda®) with bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol maleate 0.5% (BIM/TIM; Ganfort®) ophthalmic solution in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). METHODS: MERCURY-3 was a 6-month prospective, double-masked, randomized, multicenter, active-controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority study. Patients (≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of OAG or OHT in both eyes that was insufficiently controlled with topical medication (IOP ≥ 17 mmHg in ≥ 1 eye and < 28 mmHg in both eyes) were included. Following washout, patients were randomized to once-daily NET/LAT or BIM/TIM for up to 6 months; efficacy was assessed at Week 2, Week 4, and Month 3; safety was evaluated for 6 months. Comparison of NET/LAT relative to BIM/TIM for mean IOP at 08:00, 10:00, and 16:00 h was assessed at Week 2, Week 6, and Month 3. Non-inferiority of NET/LAT to BIM/TIM was defined as a difference of ≤ 1.5 mmHg at all nine time points through Month 3 and ≤ 1.0 mmHg at five or more of nine time points through Month 3. RESULTS: Overall, 430 patients were randomized (NET/LAT, n = 218; BIM/TIM, n = 212), and all received at least one dose of study medication. Efficacy analyses were performed at Month 3 on 388 patients (NET/LAT, n = 184; BIM/TIM, n = 204). NET/LAT demonstrated non-inferiority to BIM/TIM, with a between-treatment difference in IOP of ≤ 1.5 mmHg achieved at all time points and ≤ 1.0 mmHg at the majority of time points (six of nine) through Month 3. Mean diurnal IOP during the study ranged from 15.4 to 15.6 mmHg and 15.2 to 15.6 mmHg in the NET/LAT and BIM/TIM groups respectively, with no between-group statistically significant difference. No significant differences were observed in key secondary endpoints. No serious, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were observed, and AEs were typically mild/moderate in severity. The most common treatment-related AEs were conjunctival hyperemia (NET/LAT, 30.7%; BIM/TIM, 9.0%) and cornea verticillata (NET/LAT, 11.0%; BIM/TIM, 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily NET/LAT was non-inferior to BIM/TIM in IOP reduction in OAG and OHT, with AEs consistent with previous findings. NET/LAT offers a compelling alternative FDC treatment option for OAG and OHT.

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of uveitic glaucoma: multicentric study in Bogotá, Colombia.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical features of patients diagnosed with uveitic glaucoma (UG) and ocular hypertension secondary to uveitis (OHT-SU). METHODS: A multicentric cross-sectional study using medical records of patients with uveitis between 2013 and 2021. Uveitis and glaucoma specialists examined all patients. Variables were analyzed using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Additionally, t test, Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis variance analysis were used for continuous variables. Finally, a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for UG and OHT-SU development over time was done. RESULTS: Of the 660 clinical records reviewed of patients with uveitis, 191 (28.9%) had OHT-SU in at least one visit, and 108 (16.4%) of them developed UG. In all ages, females were more affected than males. Anterior uveitis was the main anatomic localisation, and non-granulomatous, recurrent, and inactive uveitis were the most frequent clinical features. The mean final visual acuity was 0.3 (0.0-1.0) LogMAR. Also, 95.8% of the patients had additional sequelae related to uveitis regardless of UG and OHT-SU. Interestingly, males had earlier affection, with statistical significance in OHT for adults (P = 0.036) and UG for children (P = 0.04). Of all patients, 81.1% received topical hypotensive treatment and 29.8% required a surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: UG and OHT-SU are common complications of uveitis in the Colombian population. These sight-threatening conditions were more common and appeared sooner in men at any age. Our results suggest that earlier and more aggressive treatment with topical hypotensive agents could positively influence the visual outcomes and the requirement of surgical procedures.

Reliability of Intraocular Pressure Measurements in a Low-Contact Drive-Through Setting.

PRCIS: Drive-through intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using iCare tonometry is a promising method of low-contact, high-throughput IOP monitoring. However, owing to its vulnerability to variable measurement technique and local air currents, the iCare may overestimate IOPs. PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a drive-through IOP measurement protocol using the iCare tonometer was established to facilitate low-contact monitoring of select glaucoma patients. As the iCare may be prone to error due to variable measurement technique and local air currents, we endeavored to assess the reliability of drive-through IOP measurements by comparing them with recent measurements taken in clinic settings. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were patients with drive-through IOP measurements performed from April 28 to October 11, 2020; exclusion criteria were pre-drive-through IOPs >21 mmHg. Drive-through IOP measurements were compared with the closest previous and/or subsequent in-clinic IOP measurements. Data were gathered using the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE) data repository. RESULTS: The post-exclusion study group consisted of 314 patients receiving a total of 868 drive-through IOP measurements, all of whom had prior in-clinic measurements, and 56.8% of whom had subsequent in-clinic measurements. Drive-through IOPs were, on average, +2.4 mmHg (+14.5%; SD 4.9) higher than in-clinic IOPs. Further sub-analysis of the data showed a difference of +2.1 mmHg OD and +2.6 mmHg OS. Compared with the closest previous in-clinic visit, the difference was +2.4 mmHg OU (+2.1 mmHg OD, +2.7 mmHg OS); compared with the closest subsequent in-clinic visit, the difference was +2.3 mmHg OU (+2.1 mmHg OD, +2.5 mmHg OS). 68.6% of all drive-through IOPs were higher than corresponding in-clinic IOPs; 21.1% were lower. 25.9% of drive-through IOPs were higher by more than 5 mmHg, whereas 3.9% of drive-through IOPs were lower by more than 5 mmHg. DISCUSSION: As teleophthalmology becomes an ever more important tool in glaucoma patient care, drive-through or walk-through IOP monitoring methods are likely to play an increasing role. However, our data reveals potential inaccuracies in drive-through iCare IOP measurements which tended to overestimate IOP. It is advisable to confirm large changes in IOP with in-clinic measurement before making management decisions. CONCLUSION: With better optimization of accuracy and reliability of measurements, drive-through tonometry is a promising, high-throughput, low-contact method of measuring IOP.

Six-Year Incidence and Risk Factors for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and risk factors for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) in a multiethnic Asian population. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases study included 10 033 participants in the baseline examination between 2004 and 2011. Of those, 6762 (response rate = 78.8%) participated in the 6-year follow-up visit between 2011 and 2017. METHODS: Standardized examination and investigations were performed, including slit lamp biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, pachymetry, gonioscopy, optic disc examination and static automated perimetry. Glaucoma was defined according to a combination of clinical evaluation, ocular imaging (fundus photo, visual field, and OCT) and criteria given by International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology. OHT was defined on the basis of elevated IOP over the upper limit of normal; i.e., 20.4 mmHg, 21.5 mmHg, and 22.6 mmHg for the Chinese, Indian, and Malay cohort respectively, without glaucomatous optic disc change. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of POAG, OHT, and OHT progression. RESULTS: The overall 6-year age-adjusted incidences of POAG and OHT were 1.31% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.62) and 0.47% (95% CI, 0.30-0.70). The rate of progression of baseline OHT to POAG at 6 years was 5.32%. Primary open-angle glaucoma incidence was similar (1.37%) in Chinese and Indians and lower (0.80%) in Malays. Malays had higher incidence (0.79%) of OHT than Indians (0.38%) and Chinese (0.37%). Baseline parameters associated with higher risk of POAG were older age (per decade: odds ratio [OR], 1.90; 95% CI, 1.54-2.35; P < 0.001), higher baseline IOP (per mmHg: OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.12-1.29; P < 0.001) and longer axial length (per mm: OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.40, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Six-year incidence of POAG was 1.31% in a multiethnic Asian population. Older age, higher IOP, and longer axial length were associated with higher risk of POAG. These findings can help in future projections and guide public healthcare policy decisions for screening at-risk individuals. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Baseline intraocular pressure: an independent risk factor in severe steroid-induced ocular hypertension after intravitreal dexamethasone implant.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the baseline intraocular pressure (IOP)-related risk of severe steroid-induced ocular hypertension (SIOH). We hypothesized that the incidence and severity of SIOH may differ according to baseline IOP in patients who received intravitreal dexamethasone implants. METHODS: A total of 889 eyes treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implants and a baseline IOP of ≤ 23 mmHg were enrolled. Enrolled patients were divided into two groups: the steroid-responders (127 eyes) and the non-steroid-responders (762 eyes). The steroid-responders group was subdivided into post-injection IOP of ≥ 25, > 30, or > 35 mmHg or IOP elevation of ≥ 10 mmHg over the baseline value. The odds ratio of SIOH was calculated using univariable logistic regression analysis, and significant variables were analyzed with a multivariable model. IOP was measured before (baseline IOP) and after dexamethasone implant injection at 1 week and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Although baseline IOP was significantly associated with the development of SIOH in logistic regression analysis, the results from the subgroup analysis differed. In the group with IOP elevation of ≥ 10 mmHg over the baseline, SIOH was not significantly associated with baseline IOP, but it was significantly related to higher baseline IOP in the severe SIOH group (IOP > 30 and > 35 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: Higher baseline IOP is a risk factor for severe SIOH. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of SIOH when administering steroids intravitreally to patients with high baseline IOP (IOP > 19 mmHg).

Inventory of Ocular Pulse Amplitude Values in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Ophthalmologic Illnesses: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Many studies have examined the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) to better understand its physiology and clinical relevance, but the papers are scattered, not consistently indexed, and sometimes difficult to locate. We aimed to identify and summarize the relevant published evidence on OPA and, in a meta-analysis, outline specific differences of this parameter between healthy individual, primary open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and cataract patients. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A thorough literature search and data extraction were conducted by 2 reviewers independently. Reports on OPA measured by the dynamic contour tonometry in conjunction with different ocular and systemic diseases or potential influencing factors were included. RESULTS: Of the 527 initially found reports, 97 met the inclusion criteria assessing 31 clinical conditions. A meta-analysis based on 6850 eyes and 106 study arms (68.8%) revealed differences in mean OPA values in millimeters of mercury between various entities. Among healthy eyes, the OPA was 2.58 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.45-2.71), whereas OPA values were higher in glaucoma (unspecified glaucoma 2.73 mm Hg, 95% CI: 2.38-3.08; normal-tension glaucoma 2.66 mm Hg, 95% CI: 2.36-2.97; and primary open-angle glaucoma 2.92 mm Hg, 95% CI: 2.75-3.08). Although ocular hypertension showed the highest OPA values (3.53 mm Hg, 95% CI: 3.05-4.01), the lowest values were found in cataract eyes (2.26 mm Hg, 95% CI: 1.57-2.94). CONCLUSION: We found different OPA values characteristic of different clinical entities, with above-normal values in glaucoma and ocular hypertension and lower values in cataract patients. Our work is intended for clinicians and researchers who want to get a quick overview of the available evidence or who need statistical data on OPA distributions in individual diseases.

Evaluation of Retinal Layers in Individuals With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome and Ocular Hypertension.

PRCIS: This study investigated the retinal segmental thicknesses in individuals with pseudoexfoliation syndrome and ocular hypertension. Maximum thinning was found at 6 mm inferior to the inner plexiform layer. This layer is very important for the early diagnosis of glaucoma. PURPOSE: To analyze the thickness of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and 8 macular layers using optical coherence tomography in eyes with ocular hypertension (OHT) and pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PXS) and healthy eyes and to evaluate between-group differences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, the macular segmentation of retinal layers in 120 eyes of 120 participants was performed automatically using current Heidelberg Spectralis optical coherence tomography software, which provides measurements for 8 retinal layers. Thickness maps divided into nine subfields (ie, 1, 3, and 6 mm) were extracted from the software for each retinal layer and compared between groups. RESULTS: The thinnest macular layers appeared in the ocular hypertensive PXS, normotensive PXS, and OHT groups in that order. In the inner retinal layers (macular retinal nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell layer, and inner plexiform layer), statistically significant differences emerged between the PXS and control groups in all quadrants of the 3 and 6 mm areas. No significant difference between the OHT group and control group appeared except in the 6 mm temporal quadrant of the inner plexiform layer (IPL). Receiving operating characteristic analysis revealed quadrants with high area-under-the-curve values at 3 and 6 mm in macular segments in all 3 groups compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: In macular segment analysis, the inner retinal layers showed the most thinning in patients with ocular hypertensive PXS. According to receiving operating characteristic curve analysis, examinations performed 6 mm inferior to the IPL, as the quadrant with the highest area under the curve in all 3 groups, are critical for the early diagnosis of glaucoma.

Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography for Cases of High Intraocular Pressure Following XEN Implant for Glaucoma.

PRCIS: This study showed that the XEN patency should be verified by OCT imaging in cases of encapsulated blebs. Although fibrosis plays the principal role, humor aqueous flow reduction could affect the "spacer" effect that inhibits the fibroblast attachments. PURPOSE: To evaluate the application of the anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) imaging in studying the relationship between a low flow rate through the XEN63 and the development of a cystic bleb. METHODS: Retrospective case series of 3 eyes presenting a cystic bleb after an XEN63 implantation for uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP). Demographic and clinical data were obtained from medical records. The imaging findings, complications, and managements following the surgery were evaluated. RESULTS: Three patients, with an average age of 67.3 years, initially showed a patent stent lumen and a functional bleb after surgery. The IOP of all eyes increased on average at 28.3 days from the surgery, with a mean value of 39.66 mm Hg. The slit lamp examination showed a cystic bleb. The AS-OCT imaging confirmed the previous finding and revealed either a partial or total occlusion of the stent internal ostium. A Nd:YAG laser, in proximity to the ostium, was performed to resolve the obstruction. Although the AS-OCT imaging showed the device patency and the IOP immediately decreased, the latter became elevated again. Consequently, in all the cases, a further needling procedure was needed to achieve an adequate IOP reduction. Six months after the two-step procedure, the IOP averaged 13.33 mm Hg, the XEN63 lumens appeared cleared, and the blebs showed a functional morphology. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: The development of a cystic bleb may result from an altered balance between the flow rate through the XEN63 and the fibrosis development in the postoperative healing process. A proper follow-up based on slit lamp biomicroscopy, IOP measurement, and AS-OCT imaging is advisable to estimate and manage a cystic bleb following XEN63 implantation.

Corneal retardation time as an ocular hypertension disease indicator.

Objective.A detailed analysis of the corneal retardation timeτas a highly related parameter to the intraocular pressure (IOP), and its plausible role as an indicator of ocular hypertension disease.Approach.A simple theoretical expression forτis derived within the corneal viscoelastic model of Kelvin-Voigt with 3 elements. This retardation time can be easily calculated from the well-known signal and pressure amplitudes of non-contact tonometers like the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). Then, a population-based study was performed where 100 subjects aged from 18 to 30 were analyzed (within this group, about 10% had an elevated IOP with more than 21 mmHg).Main results.A clear relationship between the corneal retardation time and the corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) was found, underlying the risk for ocular hypertensive (OHT) subjects with lowerτvalues to develop hypertension illnesses (due to the inability of poorly viscoelastic corneas to absorb IOP fluctuations, resulting in probable optic nerve damage).Significance.Our results might provide an useful tool to systematically discern which OHT patients (and even those with normal IOP values) are more likely to suffer glaucoma progression and, consequently, ensure an early diagnosis.

THE CORNEAL ENDOTHELIUM IN OCULAR SURFACE DISEASE AND GLAUCOMA: MECHANISMS OF DYSFUNCTION AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES.

To determine risk factors and the overall incidence of ocular surface disorders in a cohort of long-term glaucoma patients. Utilizing simple clinical tools, cross-sectional observational research were constructed to evaluate ocular surface problems and indicators. Using a four-grade scale, ten queries regarding symptoms and indications on the cornea's surface were used to create an OSD severity score. The patients were divided into three groups: A, B, and C, depending on the result. The variables that increase the incidence of surface sickness were identified using a multinomial logistic regression. Five hundred and twenty patients made up the total population. According to the multivariate analysis, the patient's age, the number of daily eyedrops, any previous changes in topical treatment for ocular intolerance, intraocular pressure, and degree of glaucoma were all connected with the severity of ocular surface illness. Ocular surface disorders are frequently developed by patients getting treatment for primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypotension. which are less prevalent and serious in geriatric patients because their use greater drugs and have greater advanced glaucoma.

Discovery of Clinical Manifestations in Spontaneous Glaucoma Suspect Nonhuman Primates.

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this study was to assess the longitudinal changes in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and relative ONH parameters using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in the living eyes of nonhuman primates with spontaneous glaucoma. METHODS: Totally 9 macaque subjects underwent a standard fundus photo and OCT examination, including 3 adult monkeys with stable elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) as the glaucoma suspect group and 6 normal IOP monkeys as the control group. Each eye of primates with IOP measurement was repeated three times. OCT measurements recorded RNFL, Bruch's membrane opening (BMO) minimum rim width (MRW). The follow-up scan of glaucomatous subjects was undergone in 10 months. RESULTS: The mean ages of glaucoma and healthy subjects are 19.33 ± 0.33 and 20.5 ± 1.46 years. Elevated IOP was achieved in three nonhuman primate eyes with an average increase of 10 mm Hg over the study period. Elevated IOP was associated with decreased RNFL thickness in all the regions and decreased RNFL phase retardation in the superior and inferior regions. When averaged over the entire retinal area, only the whole RNFL and temporal regions showed a significant decrease. The mean IPL thicknesses are 87.17 ± 2.15 µm in glaucomatous and 93.33 ± 1.51 µm in healthy eyes (p = 0.03). Lamina cribrosa parameters are measured from the OCT images and showed significant differences between glaucoma primates and normal primates. CONCLUSIONS: Of the measured parameters, decreased RNFL and MRW were correlated with glaucomatous damage. Natural glaucoma primate can be a natural glaucoma model which is closer to glaucoma in humans.

Effect of the iridocorneal angle size on the diurnal pressure profile in a glaucoma suspect cohort and patients with glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of the iridocorneal angle size (ICAS) on the diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with suspected glaucoma (SG). METHOD: Patients with any eye-pressure lowering medication or previous ocular surgery were excluded. In a retrospective study set, diurnal IOP profiles of 120 patients (205 eyes) within a 48-h period were analysed by regression analysis. Of those eyes, 44 were diagnosed to have glaucoma. The remaining eyes were used as healthy control group (HCG). RESULTS: The overall mean IOP was 15.63 mmHg ± 2.72 mmHg and mean ICAS was 23.92° ± 4.74°. In the glaucoma cohort, mean IOP was 18.77 ± 1.86 mmHg and mean ICAS was 25.02° ± 4.96°. In the HCG, mean IOP was 14.77 ± 2.25 mmHg and mean ICAS was 23.62° ± 4.64°. In the total cohort, as well as in the subgroups (HCG or glaucoma), regression analysis showed no significant impact even of the minimum ICAS, which was larger than 10°, on average (P = 0.89), maximum (P = 0.88), and range of IOP (P = 0.49) within 48 h. The difference between glaucoma cohort and HCG cohort was significant in terms of IOP (P < 0.001), but not for minimum ICAS (P = 0.07). Chi-square test showed no increase in prevalence of IOP peaks of  > 21 mmHg within 48 h in eyes with an angle between 10° and 20° (P = 0.18). CONCLUSION: An ICAS of larger than 10° in HCG or glaucoma patients with an open-angle does not influence the minimum, average, maximum or range of IOP. Additionally, an angle size larger than 10° does not allow the prediction of IOP changes in these two cohorts.

Participant Experience Using Novel Perimetry Tests to Monitor Glaucoma Progression.

PRCIS: Participant surveys taken after using tablet-based and smart visual function analyzer (SVFA) perimetry tests suggest that patients may prefer novel perimetry tests over traditional visual field machines. PURPOSE: Compare patient experience using the IMOvifa SVFA and the tablet-based Melbourne Rapid Fields visual field (VF) tests to the Humphrey Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Standard. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study on adult participants with diagnoses of glaucoma suspect, ocular hypertension, or glaucoma. Participants attended 2 study visits ~3 months apart. During the first visit, participants were trained to use the 2 novel perimeters, took 1 test on both new devices and the Humphrey Field Analyzer, then were surveyed. Participants received tablets and performed weekly tablet VF tests at home between study visits. At the final study visit, participants re-took the VF tests and completed the same surveys. RESULTS: Eighty-one participants were surveyed twice. At the baseline survey, participants preferred the SVFA (71.7%) and tablet tests (69.2%) over the Humphrey VF. Most were willing to perform weekly monitoring at home on the SVFA (69.1%) and tablet (75.4%). Participants generally had a "very good" overall experience when testing on the SVFA (71.6%) and tablet (90.1%). At the final visit, fewer participants were willing to test on the tablet daily (23.5% to 9.9%; P = 0.02 for change) and more were willing to test monthly (18.5% to 33.3%; P = 0.03 for change). CONCLUSION: Users reported a preference for novel VF devices. Overall participant experience using these devices was positive, supporting the feasibility of home monitoring of VFs from an experience perspective.

Assessment of the iCare HOME2, a New Intraocular Pressure Self-Measurement Tonometer.

PRCIS: The iCare HOME2 tonometer generally can be considered reliable for most eyes and clinical settings, although it may produce slightly overestimated or underestimated intraocular pressure (IOP) readings in thicker and thinner corneas, respectively. PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy, correlation, and analysis of differences in IOP measurements between the gold standard Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and the new, self-measurement iCare HOME2 tonometer (icare). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients were randomly selected from those who attended a routine examination in our clinic. After a complete ocular examination, each patient's IOP was measured and recorded with GAT and iCare HOME2. Central corneal thickness was measured. Eyes with any corneal morbidity were excluded. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between paired IOP measurements. Bland-Altman plots were graphed for the analysis of differences in IOP between the instruments. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five eyes of 70 patients were included in the study. The mean IOP measured with GAT was 16.3 ± 6.5 mm Hg (range: 3-56). The mean IOP measured with iCare HOME2 was 16.5 ± 7.3 mm Hg (range: 3-55), ( P = 0.47). A strong, significant positive correlation was found for paired IOP measurements by the 2 instruments ( r = 0.94; P < 0.0001). A small systematic proportional bias was seen for the paired IOP measurements, meaning that with higher IOPs the iCare HOME2 yielded higher IOP readings than GAT, but this difference was clinically insignificant. The instrument underestimated IOPs with corneas thinner than 522 µm, whereas it overestimated IOPs when corneas were thicker than this. CONCLUSION: The iCare HOME2 could be a reliable tonometer for most eyes and clinical settings. Central corneal thickness measurement is recommended in patients who use the instrument.