Role of anesthesiologists in managing perioperative anemia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Anemia can contribute negatively to a patient's morbidity and mortality. Which treatment options do exist and what role do anesthesiologists play in management of perioperative anemia treatment? This review gives an overview about recent findings. RECENT FINDINGS: Patient Blood Management and standards for the management and treatment of anemia have been established worldwide. Various logistic settings and approaches are possible. With a special focus on cardiovascular anesthesia, intravenous iron is a therapeutic option in the preoperative setting. Autologous blood salvage is a standard procedure during surgery. Restrictive transfusion triggers in adult cardiac surgery have been shown to be beneficial in the majority of studies. Elderly patients and defined comorbidities might require higher transfusion triggers. Both, intravenous and oral iron increase hemoglobin values when given prior to surgery. Oral iron is effective when given several weeks prior to elective surgery. Erythropoietin is a treatment decision individualized to each patient. SUMMARY: Within the previous 18 months, important publications have demonstrated the established role of anesthesiologists in managing perioperative anemia. A substantial pillar for anemia treatment is the implementation of Patient Blood Management worldwide.

Lateral Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Step-by-Step Description for the Surgeon Unacquainted with This Complex Procedure with the Use of the Laparoscopic Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Lateral node dissection in rectal cancer has been routinely performed in Eastern countries. Technical and anatomical challenges and potential significant postoperative morbidity associated with the procedure have prevented its implementation into clinical practice in Western countries. However, the minimally invasive approach may offer the opportunity of performing this complex procedure with precise anatomical dissection and minimal intraoperative blood loss. In this setting, proper training and standardization of technical steps is highly warranted for surgeons not fully acquainted with the procedure. TECHNIQUE: Access to the lateral nodes along the obturator and internal iliac vessels is described by using specific anatomical landmarks. Opening of the peritoneum along the ureter provides access to the region of interest. Dissection of the medial limit is performed preserving the neurovascular bundle and ureter. The lateral dissection is performed along the external iliac vein to provide access to the obturator muscle. Identification of the obturator nerve with blunt dissection of the fat is a critical part of the procedure. Once the lymphatic connections between the inguinal and iliac nodes are transected, dissection is performed along the internal iliac vessels, and branches are separated from the lymphadenectomy specimen. RESULTS: Evidence supports that lateral node dissection performed for highly selected patients with minimally invasive access leads to less intraoperative blood loss and similar oncological outcomes. Technical steps illustrated in the present video may aid surgeons in performing this procedure with precise anatomical landmarks and minimal risk for intraoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral node dissection for rectal cancer is a procedure that may follow standardized technical steps by using precise anatomical landmarks with the use of minimally invasive approach.

Manejo de la anemia perioperatoria en paciente con aloanticuerpos programada para esofagectomía / Management of peri-operative anaemia in a patient with rare alloantibodies scheduled for oesophagectomy

Describimos el manejo de una paciente programada para esofagectomía por neoplasia a la que durante el proceso de reserva de hemoderivados le fueron detectados aloanticuerpos, que prácticamente imposibilitaban la obtención de sangre compatible. El manejo de la anemia perioperatoria («patient blood management») se debe realizar rutinariamente en los pacientes quirúrgicos con riesgo de transfusión. Esta estrategia se ha considerado como una de las medidas a tener en cuenta en la rehabilitación multimodal quirúrgica o programa de recuperación intensificada

A description is presented on the management of a patient with an oesophageal neoplasm scheduled for oesophagectomy. Alloantibodies were detected during a blood components reservation procedure, which made it almost impossible to obtain compatible blood. Peri-operative anaemia management or "Patient Blood Management" should be routinely performed in all patients at transfusion risk. This strategy has been considered as one of the actions to bear in mind in fast-track surgery or enhanced recovery after surgery

Association of Anaesthetists guidelines: cell salvage for peri-operative blood conservation 2018.

The use of cell salvage is recommended when it can be expected to reduce the likelihood of allogeneic (donor) red cell transfusion and/or severe postoperative anaemia. We support and encourage a continued increase in the appropriate use of peri-operative cell salvage and we recommend that it should be available for immediate use 24 h a day in any hospital undertaking surgery where blood loss is a recognised potential complication (other than minor/day case procedures).

Blood and Blood Product Conservation: Results of Strategies to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Open Heart Surgery Patients at a Tertiary Hospital.

Blood product usage is a quality outcome for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. To address an increase in blood product usage since the discontinuation of aprotinin, blood conservation strategies were initiated at a tertiary hospital in Oakland, CA. Improving transfusion rates for open heart surgery patients requiring Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) involved multiple departments in coordination. Specific changes to conserve blood product usage included advanced CPB technology upgrades, and precise individualized heparin dose response titration assay for heparin and protamine management. Retrospective analysis of blood product usage pre-implementation, post-CPB changes and post-Hemostasis Management System (HMS) implementation was done to determine the effectiveness of the blood conservation strategies. Statistically significant decrease in packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, and platelet usage over the stepped implementation of both technologies was observed. New oxygenator and centrifugal pump technologies reduced active circuitry volume and caused less damage to blood cells. Individualizing heparin and protamine dosing to a patient using the HMS led to transfusion reductions as well. Overall trends toward reductions in hospital length of stay and intensive care unit stay, and as a result, blood product cost and total hospitalization cost are positive over the period of implementation of both CPB circuit changes and HMS implementation. Although they are multifactorial in nature, these trends provide positive enforcement to the changes implemented.

Implementation of an obstetric cell salvage service in a tertiary women's hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is an important aspect of patient blood management programmes. An ICS service was introduced at KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, from 2 May 2011 to 30 April 2013 to aid in the management of massive obstetric haemorrhage. METHODS: With support from the Ministry of Health's Healthcare Quality Improvement and Innovation Fund, a workgroup comprising obstetricians, anaesthetists and nursing staff was formed to develop training requirements, clinical guidelines and protocols for implementing ICS using the Haemonetics Cell Saver 5. Pregnant women with an anticipated blood loss of > 1,000 mL during Caesarean delivery, a baseline haemoglobin level of < 10 g/dL, rare blood types and who had refused donor blood were recruited to the service after obtaining informed consent. RESULTS: A total of 11 women were recruited to the ICS service; the primary indications were placenta praevia and placenta accreta. Median blood loss in these 11 patients was 1,500 (range 400-3,000) mL. In four patients, adequate autologous blood was collected to initiate processing and salvaged, processed blood was successfully reinfused (mean 381.3 [range 223.0-700.0] mL). Median blood loss among these four patients was 2,000 (range 2,000-3,000) mL. No adverse event occurred following autologous transfusion. Mean immediate postoperative haemoglobin level was 8.0 (range 7.1-9.4) g/dL. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an obstetric ICS service in our institution was successful. Future studies should seek to address the cost-effectiveness of ICS in reducing allogeneic blood utilisation.

Lactate dehydrogenase and Haemolysis Index as quality control markers of haemolysis in intra-operative cell salvage.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this investigation was to explore the potential use of the tests lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and Haemolysis Index as haemolysis markers in intra-operative cell salvage (ICS) blood in comparison to plasma free haemoglobin levels. BACKGROUND: Quality control (QC) should be seen as a fundamental part of any ICS blood conservation programme, however, due to lack of available knowledge, familiarity and experience, QC is still a comparatively new subject. A QC pilot scheme is currently being undertaken by the Royal Cornwall Hospital in association with the UK Cell Salvage Action Group to explore potential markers that can be used to assess the quality of blood obtained from ICS. This test list should be available to all ICS users and achievable within financial budgets. Currently this proposed test list includes a full blood count, a protein marker such as urine albumin/microalbumin and heparin monitoring. Haemolysis testing is another key marker. METHODS/MATERIALS: Samples were collected from ICS processed blood and allogeneic SAGM leucodepleted red cell units and processed for plasma free haemoglobin, LDH and Haemolysis Index. RESULTS: There was a very strong correlation between plasma free haemoglobin and LDH (0.960), and plasma free haemoglobin and the Haemolysis Index (0.944). CONCLUSION: We have shown that the LDH and Haemolysis Index tests are suitable and reliable alternatives for measuring haemolysis from samples obtained from ICS or allogeneic blood. We have incorporated the LDH test into our Hospital's ICS QC package and recommend that this test is considered for all ICS QC samples.

[2013: The Seville document on consensus on the alternatives to allogenic blood transfusion. Update to the Seville document. Spanish Societies of Anaesthesiology (SEDAR), Haematology and Haemotherapy (SEHH), Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH), Critical Care Medicine (SEMICYUC), Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SETH) and Blood Transfusion (SETS)]. / 2013: Documento «Sevilla¼ de Consenso sobre Alternativas a la Transfusión de Sangre Alogénica. Actualización del Documento Sevilla

As allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) is not harmless, multiple alternatives to TSA (AABT) have emerged, but there is a huge variability with respect to their indications and appropriate use. This variability results from the interplay of a number of factors, which include physicians specialty, knowledge and preferences, degree of anaemia, transfusion policy, and AABT availability. Since the ABBT are not harmless and may not meet costeffectiveness criteria, such avariability is unacceptable. The Spanish Societies of Anaesthesiology (SEDAR), Haematology and Haemotherapy (SEHH), Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH), Critical Care Medicine (SEMICYUC), Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SETH) and Blood Transfusion (SETS) have developed a Consensus Document for the proper use of AABTs. A panel of experts convened by these six Societies have conducted a systematic review of the medical literature and developed the «2013. Seville Document of Consensus on Alternatives to Allogeneic Blood Transfusion¼, which only considers those AABT aimed to decrease the transfusion of packed red cells. The AABTs are defined as any pharmacological and non-pharmacological measure aimed to decrease the transfusion of of red blood cell concentrates, while preserving the patient safety. For each AABT, the main question is formulated, positively or negatively, as: «Does or does not this particular AABT reduce the transfusion rate?¼ All the recommendations on the use of AABTs were formulated according to the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology.

La transfusión de sangre alogénica (TSA) no es inocua, y como consecuencia han surgido múltiples alternativas a la TSA (ATSA). Existe variabilidad respecto a las indicaciones y buen uso de las ATSA. Dependiendo de la especialidad de los médicos que tratan a los pacientes, grado de anemia, política transfusional, disponibilidad de las ATSA y criterio personal, las ATSA se usan de forma variable. Puesto que las ATSA tampoco son inocuas y pueden no cumplir criterios de coste-efectividad, la variabilidad en su uso es inaceptable. Las sociedades españolas de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR), Hematología y Hemoterapia (SEHH), Farmacia Hospitalaria (SEFH), Medicina Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC), Trombosis y Hemostasia (SETH) y Transfusiones Sanguíneas (SETS) han elaborado un documento de consenso para el buen uso de la ATSA. Un panel de expertos de las seis sociedades han llevado a cabo una revisión sistemática de la literatura médica y elaborado el «2013. Documento Sevilla de Consenso sobre Alternativas a la Transfusión de Sangre Alogénica¼. Solo se contempla las ATSA dirigidas a disminuir la transfusión de concentrado de hematíes. Se definen las ATSA como toda medida farmacológica y no farmacológica, encaminada a disminuir la transfusión de concentrado de hematíes, preservando siempre la seguridad del paciente. La cuestión principal que se plantea en cada ítem se formula, en forma positiva o negativa, como: «La ATSA en cuestión reduce / no reduce la Tasa Transfusional¼. Para formular el grado de recomendación se ha usado la metodología GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation).

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a blood salvage system in primary total knee arthroplasty--a retrospective match-controlled chart review.

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and cost effectiveness of the OrthoPAT blood salvage system (Haemonetics Corp., Braintree, MA) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Two-hundred-and-two patients who received the OrthoPAT system were matched to 202 controls. A second match was performed for subjects weighing <75 kg. For all matched subjects, no significant difference in allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) rate was found between the control and study groups (p=0.55). In the subjects <75 kg, use of the OrthoPAT system almost halved the incidence of ABT; however, in this small population the result was not statistically significant (p=0.10). Blood management costs for study patients were significantly higher than those of the control group in both the total matched pairs and those <75 kg (p< 0.0001 and p= 0.05, respectively).

The volume of returned red blood cells in a large blood salvage program: where does it all go?

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative blood salvage is the process whereby shed red blood cells (RBCs) are collected and returned to the patient. We analyzed the trends in the volume of returned RBCs by our blood salvage program across a 12-hospital regional health care system over a 5-year period. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All quality control, RBC recovery, and patient demographic data relating to blood salvage are stored in a large database covering these 12 hospitals. Cases in which blood salvage was performed over a 5-year period were stratified based on patient demographics, hospital, type of surgery, and volume of RBCs recovered. RESULTS: There were 19,867 surgeries performed during the study period in which blood salvage was used. The median volume of blood returned to each patient was 405 mL (25th-75th percentile, 135-750 mL). Defining the volume of an RBC unit as 200 mL, this represented a median of 1.1 RBC unit equivalents (25th-75th percentile, 0.37-2.1 units) returned to each patient. For the majority of patients, not more than 1 RBC unit equivalent was recovered. Overall, the ratio of cases where at least 1 RBC unit equivalent was recovered to cases where less than 1 RBC equivalent was recovered was 2.5:1; this ratio varied considerably between surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Although overall the mean volumes of RBCs returned to the patients by intraoperative blood salvage were high, the actual volumes returned depended on the case mix. There appears to be an opportunity to use blood salvage more selectively to improve efficiency.

A quality assurance programme for cell salvage in cardiac surgery.

At the same time as cell salvage was introduced into our institution for all patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, we established a supporting programme of quality assurance to reassure clinicians regarding safety and efficacy. Data collected in patients operated on between 2001 and 2007 included pre- and post-wash heparin concentration, haemoglobin concentration and free haemoglobin concentration. Cell salvage was used in 6826 out of a total of 7243 patients (94%). Post-wash heparin concentration was consistently low (always < 0.4 IU.ml(-1)). There was a significant decrease in post-wash haemoglobin concentration in 2003 compared to 2001, from a median (IQR [range]) of 19.6 (16.7-22.2 [12.9-25.5]) g.dl(-1) to 17.5 (13.6-20.8 [12.6-23.7]) g.dl(-1) (p < 0.015). In addition, there was a significant increase in free plasma haemoglobin in 2006 compared to 2001, from 0.5 (0.3-0.8 [0.1-2.6]) g.l(-1) to 0.8 (0.3-1.4 [0.3-5.2]) g.l(-1) (p < 0.001). This programme led to the detection of a change in operator behaviour in 2003 and progressive machine deterioration resulting in appropriate fleet replacement in 2006. You can respond to this article at http://www.anaesthesiacorrespondence.com.