ABSTRACT
Closing a recurrent oroantral fistula (OAF) that occurs at an infected sinus augmentation site is a challenge for clinicians. The recurrent OAF has a detrimental impact on bone regeneration and subsequent implant placement. This case report includes three cases in which sinus graft infection and OAF occurred after maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA). In these cases, treatments to control sinus infection were performed using an otolaryngologist; then, intraoral interventions comprising mucosal flap procedures, bone grafts, and barrier membrane applications were performed 2-5 times by oral surgeons. Nevertheless, OAF recurred persistently. The failure to stop OAF recurrence may be due to the inability to effectively block air pressure at the OAF site. Following a comprehensive debridement of the infected tissue at the previous sinus augmentation site, a pouch was created through sinus mucosal elevation. The perforated sinus mucosa at the OAF site was covered with a non-resorbable membrane in one case and with resorbable collagen membranes in the other two cases, followed by bone grafting within the pouch. Lastly, this procedure was completed by blocking the entrance of the pouch with a cortical bone shell graft and a resorbable collagen membrane. The cortical bone shell graft, obstructing the air pressure from the nasal cavity, facilitated bone formation, and, ultimately, allowed for implant placement. Within the limitations of the present case report, the application of a guided bone regeneration technique involving a cortical bone shell graft and a barrier membrane enabled the closure of the recurrent OAF and subsequent implant placement.
Subject(s)
Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic , Oroantral Fistula , Humans , Oroantral Fistula/etiology , Oroantral Fistula/surgery , Maxillary Sinus/surgery , Bone Transplantation/methods , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Collagen/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Objetivo: El odontoma es una lesión hamartomatosa benigna formada por tejido dentario (cemento, esmalte, pul pa). Según su grado de diferenciación podrá ser clasificado en sus dos variantes: compuesto y complejo en una relación 2:1. El objetivo de este artículo es presentar un odontoma mixto de gran tamaño de localización mandibular y su resolución quirúrgica. Caso clínico: Se describe el caso de un paciente mascu lino de 16 años de edad, portador de ortodoncia, que presenta un odontoma mixto de gran tamaño de localización mandibular y su resolución quirúrgica utilizando planificación 3D y confección de placa de titanio customizada (AU)
Aim: Odontoma is a benign hamartomatous lesion formed by dental tissue (cementum, enamel, pulp). According to its degree of differentiation, it can be classified in its two variants: compound and complex in a 2:1 ratio. The objective of this article is to present a large mixed odontoma of mandi bular location and its surgical resolution. Clinical case: A 16-year-old male patient with ortho dontics, who presents a large mixed odontoma with mandibu lar location and its surgical resolution using 3D planning and customized titanium plate fabrication (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Tooth Abnormalities/classification , Odontogenic Tumors/classification , Odontoma/surgery , Mandible/pathology , Patient Care Planning , Argentina , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Dental Service, Hospital , Surgical Fixation Devices , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/therapyABSTRACT
Las estrategias para el éxito en la rehabilitación bucal requieren de la interrelación de varias disciplinas que en conjunto logren resultados predecibles y duraderos. La visión individualizada de cada área de especialidad puede conllevar a no ofrecer la mejor alternativa de tratamiento, es por ello que la valoración, el diagnóstico y la planificación del caso clínico debe ser realizada por un equipo interdisciplinario para evitar esta situación y crear una sinergia en donde el «todo sea mayor que la suma de sus partes¼. El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar un caso clínico en el cual intervinieron varias áreas de especialidad: periodoncia, prostodoncia, cirugía oral y patología bucal, logrando devolver la función y la estética a través del manejo interdisciplinario (AU)
The strategies for success in oral rehabilitation require the interrelation of several disciplines, which together, achieve predictable and lasting results. The individualized view of each specialty area may lead to not offering the best treatment alternative, which is why the assessment, diagnosis, and planning of the clinical case must be carried out by an interdisciplinary team to avoid this situation and create a synergy in where the «whole is greater than the sum of its parts¼. The objective of this work is to present a clinical case where several areas of specialty intervened: periodontics, prosthodontics, oral surgery, and oral pathology, thus achieving the return of function and aesthetics through interdisciplinary management (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Mouth Rehabilitation , Periodontitis/therapy , Schools, Dental , Patient Satisfaction , Photography, Dental , Advance Care Planning , Denture, Complete, Immediate , Esthetics, Dental , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods , Labial Frenum/surgery , MexicoABSTRACT
Procedural sedation has become popular for describing a semiconscious state that allows patients to be comfortable during certain surgical or diagnostic procedures. Sedation may be enhanced by locoregional anesthetic techniques to produce sufficient analgesia and muscle relaxation for surgery to occur. Sedation and local anesthesia for standing diagnostic and surgical procedures on the horse's head circumvents the potential complications of general anesthesia (particularly, complications related to recovery). However, the implementation of a locoregional anesthetic technique requires a thorough understanding of the anatomy to maximize success and minimize possible complications.
Subject(s)
Analgesia/veterinary , Anesthesia, Local/veterinary , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/veterinary , Animals , Horse Diseases/surgery , Horses , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Pain Management/veterinaryABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: Smoking has been found to interfere with wound healing processes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare surgical treatment of oroantral fistulae (OAFs) in smokers and non-smokers. Materials and Methods: Medical records of all consecutive patients who underwent surgical closure of OAFs between 2003 and 2016 at the oral and maxillofacial surgery department, Rabin Medical Center, Israel were reviewed. Patients' demographic data, preoperative signs and symptoms, surgical method of repair, and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: The cohort consisted of 38 smokers and 59 non-smokers. Age and gender distributions were similar in both groups. The main etiology in both groups was tooth extraction, followed by pre-prosthetic surgery in smokers and odontogenic infection in non-smokers (p = 0.02). Preoperative conditions were not significantly different between smokers and non-smokers in terms of size of soft tissue fistula and bony defect, chronic sinusitis and foreign bodies inside the sinus. OAFs were repaired by local soft tissue flaps without consideration of smoking status. Smokers experienced more moderate-severe postoperative pain (p = 0.05) and requested more weak opioids (p = 0.06). Postoperative complications included infection, delayed wound healing, residual OAF, pain, sensory disturbances and sino nasal symptoms. These were mostly minor and tended to be more frequent in smokers (p = 0.35). Successful closure of OAFs was obtained in all patients except one smoker who required revision surgery. Conclusions: Smokers may be more susceptible to OAFs secondary to preprosthetic surgery. In this cohort, there was no statistically significant difference in outcome between smokers and non-smokers in terms of failure. However, smokers tended to have more severe postoperative pain and discomfort and to experience more postoperative complications. Further studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted to validate these results.
Subject(s)
Nicotiana/adverse effects , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/standards , Oroantral Fistula/surgery , Smokers/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Clinical Protocols , Female , Humans , Israel , Male , Middle Aged , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Flaps/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
This report presents a full-mouth rehabilitation case. A patient came with a failing dentition in maxilla, and after the treatment, the patient had a shortened full-arch, implant-supported, screw-retained hybrid acrylic complete denture in the maxilla and full-arch metal ceramic restorations in the mandible. The report describes the steps involved in the prosthodontic rehabilitation; a cost-effective treatment plan, the restoration of vertical dimension, an immediate denture, an implant-level impression, a verified-master cast, the fabrication of definitive prosthesis, the occlusal scheme and multiple follow-ups in 6 months. We discussed the merits/demerits of screw-retained prosthesis, impression techniques and various types of fixed complete dentures. We learnt the difficulty in hygiene measures and dissatisfaction of the patient with the hygienic gaps under the acrylic fixed dentures.
Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Denture, Complete , Metal Ceramic Alloys , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Technology, Dental/methods , Humans , Hygiene , Male , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/surgery , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/surgery , Middle Aged , Patient SatisfactionABSTRACT
La regeneración ósea horizontal tiene por objeto solventar las deficiencias de volumen óseo vestíbulopalatino o lingual, previa o simultáneamente a la colocación de implantes dentales. Hoy en día, existen diferentes técnicas para realizar una regeneración ósea, su selección depende de las características del caso clínico que se vaya a realizar. Los injertos óseos, se pueden clasificar según su origen y según su forma. Atendiendo a su origen, se distinguen en injertos autólogos, aloinjertos, materiales aloplásicos y xenoinjertos. En función de la forma se distinguen en bloque o particulados, siendo principalmente autoinjertos y xenoinjertos, respectivamente. Los primeros estudios sobre el tema preconizaban el uso de los autoinjertos en bloque como el Gold Standard en la regeneración ósea previa a la colocación de implantes. El propósito de esta revisión bibliográfica fue comparar los resultados obtenidos en cuanto a ganancia de hueso horizontal tras la regeneración del sector anterior de un maxilar atrófico, con injerto en bloque autólogo versus xenoinjerto particulado. Se realiza una actualización bibliográfica sobre técnicas de aumento de volumen óseo horizontal previas a la colocación de implantes, con el fin de comparar las dos técnicas más utilizadas hoy en día
The purpose of horizontal bone regeneration is to resolve the deficiencies/shortcomings of the buccal or palatal volume, prior or simultaneously to the placement of dental implants. Nowadays, there are different techniques to perform a bone regeneration, its selection depends on the characteristics of the clinical case that is going to be performed. Bone grafts can be classified according to their origin and their shape. Based on their origin, they are distinguished in autologous grafts, allografts, alloplastic materials and xenografts. Depending on the shape, they are distinguished in block or particulate, being mainly autografts and xenografts, respectively. The first studies on the subject, advocated the use of block autografts such as the Gold Standard in bone regeneration prior to implant placement. The purpose of this literature review was to compare the results obtained in terms of horizontal bone gain after regeneration of the anterior sector of an atrophic maxilla, with autologous block graft versus particulate xenograft. A bibliographic update is made on techniques of horizontal bone volume increase prior to the placement of implants, in order to compare the two techniques most used today
Subject(s)
Humans , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Bone Regeneration , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy, safety, and anticipation effect of a novel electrical conductivity device (SG) in maxillary osteotomy preparation for placement of dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven osteotomies were prepared by three operators with different levels of expertise, using the SG protocol in the maxilla of six fresh frozen cadavers. A pre-op CT measurement of the length of bone in the desired implant location was taken and compared with the final length of the osteotomy created using SG during surgery. A comparison was made between the results of the different operators. RESULTS: The pre-op CT bone length measurements and the final depth assessment of the osteotomy with SG had a very high correlation level (0.977) with a significant mean difference of 0.639 mm (P < .0001), with the pre-op CT measurements being longer. The least experienced operator had placed the implants 0.924 mm less deep than the pre-op CT length measurements while the most experienced operator had placed the implants 0.244 mm less deep than the pre op CT length measurements. All implants were placed in the correct position and no breach of the sinus/nasal floor or buccal/palatine bone plates was detected. CONCLUSIONS: The SG electrical conductivity device offers the operator real-time monitoring during the surgical procedure. It provides a simple, safe, and sensitive method of detecting breaches, making it simple and safe for oral surgeons with different levels of expertise to use, with promising results.
Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Electric Conductivity , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/instrumentation , Osteotomy/instrumentation , Osteotomy/methods , Cadaver , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/instrumentation , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Humans , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/surgery , Maxillary Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Maxillary Sinus/surgery , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To answer the PICO question: "Among patients to whom an implant is placed, does the piezoelectric surgery (PS) compared to the conventional drilling (CS) achieve higher implant stability, increase surgical time or improve implant survival rate?" STUDY SELECTION: Two independent authors screened the literature through MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Scopus. Randomized or non-randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies comparing implant stability and/or clinical outcomes with PS versus CS used for implant site preparation published in the last 10 years were included in the search. RESULTS: Five of the 177 articles initially found were included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant differences were found between PS and CS for implant stability quotient (ISQ) at baseline (SMD: 0.31; 95 %CI: -0.59 to 1.20; p=0.5). However, ISQ values were significantly higher at 2 months (SMD: 0.52; 95 %CI: 0.03-1.00; p=0.04) and at 3 months (SMD: 0.74; 95 %CI: 0.17-1.32; p=0.01) for CS. PS needed significantly more time than CS (SMD: 1.74; 95 %CI: 0.42-3.06; p=0.01) in order to be performed. No differences for implant survival rates were found when comparing both techniques (RR: 0.52; 95 %CI: 0.09-2.88; p=0.45). CONCLUSIONS: PS has not demonstrated superiority to conventional drilling for implant stability during the healing period. PS needs significantly longer surgery time than CS. Differences for implant survival rate were not found between the two techniques.
Subject(s)
Dental Implant-Abutment Design/methods , Dental Implants , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Osseointegration , Piezosurgery , Prosthesis Failure , Cohort Studies , Databases, Bibliographic , Humans , Operative Time , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Wound HealingABSTRACT
The aim of this systematic review was to assess the primary and secondary stability of dental implants placed at sites prepared with piezoelectric bone surgery (PBS) and conventional drilling (CD). The PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched without date or language restriction up to June 2017. Controlled clinical trials in which each patient received implants placed at sites prepared with both PBS and CD were selected. Implant stability had to be measured on day 0 and during the osseointegration period. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. A meta-analysis was performed to compare primary stability (on day 0) and secondary stability (after 2 and 3months) between the two groups. The studies included were determined to have a high risk of bias. There was no significant difference between the two groups for primary stability (on day 0) (P=0.51). After 2 and 3months, secondary stability was statistically higher in implants placed with PBS preparation (P=0.04 and P=0.01, respectively). The implant survival rate was 97.5% in the CD group and 100% in the PBS group. PBS preparation improves secondary stability after 2 and 3months in comparison to CD, with similar implant survival rates. Further studies are needed to determine whether implant osseointegration periods could be shortened with PBS preparation.
Subject(s)
Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Dental Implants , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Piezosurgery/methods , HumansABSTRACT
RATIONALE: In this case study, a modified transcrestal approach was applied to the patient of extremely atrophic posterior maxilla. We analysis the Implant Stability Quotient values (ISQ) to monitor implant stability, and the cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT) to evaluate the bone regeneration. PATIENT CONCERN: A 26-year-old female patient visited our hospital with no contraindications for dental implants and a loss of the maxillary right first molar. DIAGNOSE: Examination by CBCT demonstrated the posterior maxilla was extremely atrophic, the residual bone height (RBH) of #16 was 3.5âmm. INTERVENTION: Patient underwent a endoscopically controlled flapless sinus floor elevation. The maxillary sinus membrane was elevated by two-step, and an implant of 12âmm length was placed simultaneously. OUTCOMES: Twelve weeks post-surgery, the implant-level impression was finished and a full-ceramic crown was placed thereafter. LESSONS: The modified transcrestal approach can be applied to augment maxillary sinus with a residual bone height less than 4âmm.
Subject(s)
Dental Implantation/methods , Endoscopy/methods , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Platelet-Rich Fibrin , Sinus Floor Augmentation/methods , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy , Dental Implants , Female , Humans , Maxilla/surgery , Maxillary Sinus/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 2 iliac corticocancellous-block grafting techniques for dental implant placement in residual alveolar clefts. DESIGN: Nonrandomized prospective clinical trial between March 2010 and December 2014. SETTING: National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Hanoi, Vietnam. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two patients (23 female, 9 male; mean age, 21.28 years; range, 16-31 years) with unilateral complete alveolar cleft after reconstructive surgery for cleft lip and palate (CLP). INTERVENTIONS: Harvested iliac crest bone was cut into 2 corticocancellous blocks. The smaller block was adapted against the sutured nasal mucoperiosteum and overlaid with cancellous bone; the larger one overlapped the labial cleft margin and was fixed with screws. Endosteal dental implants were placed after 4 to 6 months, and final restorations were delivered 6 months later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Flap statuses were assessed clinically. Bone formation was assessed using the Enemark scale. Cone-beam computed tomography was used for graft height and width measurements. Implant health was assessed by the Misch criteria. RESULTS: The mean postgrafting follow-up period was 36.7 ± 10.4 (range, 18-53) months. Three patients (9.4%) showed flap dehiscence but no infection 7 days after bone grafting. Twenty-nine patients (90.6%) had 75% to 100% bone fill (Enemark score of 1). The mean graft height and width were 11.4 ± 2.4 and 6.1 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. Sufficient bone for implant placement was noted in 29 patients (90.6%); the others required partially fixed prostheses. All implants functioned for at least 18 months. CONCLUSION: The proposed technique is reliable to reconstruct the alveolar cleft for implant placement in CLP patients.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods , Bone Transplantation/methods , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Dental Implants , Ilium/transplantation , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Bone Screws , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Female , Humans , Male , Osteogenesis , Prospective Studies , Surgical Flaps , Suture Techniques , Treatment Outcome , VietnamABSTRACT
Maxillary sinus lift surgery (MSLS) is considered to be a useful treatment method for patients with atrophic alveolar bone. Choosing a suitable surgical procedure to simultaneously decrease graft absorption and obtain long-term survival of dental implants is still a challenge. In this study, 20 patients received MSLS with graft of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2)-loaded calcium phosphate. Dental implants were placed simultaneously in 10 patients receiving MSLS (1-stage group), and in 10 patients receiving dental implants with a 3 to 6 months delay (2-stage group). The effects were evaluated based on clinical and radiographic examination during a 4 to 5 years follow-up. The results showed that only 1 perforation of the maxillary sinus mucosa was observed in 1-stage group, and was patched with a collagen membrane. An average bone gain of 6.8âmm was observed, and all implants exhibited no looseness, peri-implantitis, or fracture, all of which were stable during the follow-up and exhibited nice dental function during a 4 to 5 years follow-up. The loss of peri-implant bone height was 1.12â±â0.47 and 1.10â±â0.39âmm, the probing depth of periodontal pocket was 1.79â±â0.62 and 1.81â±â0.71âmm, the sulcular bleeding index was 1.63â±â0.47 and 1.72â±â0.54 in 1-stage group and 2-stage group, respectively, and no significant differences existed between these 2 groups. These findings implied that BMP2-loaded calcium phosphate may be a suitable material for MSLS, especially for patients with minimal bone height. Clinicians can use the 1- or 2-stage technique based on clinical condition, patients' choice and clinicians' experience. In patients where implants cannot be stabilized for patients with minimal bone height, 2-stage surgery may be more suitable.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2/therapeutic use , Bone Regeneration/drug effects , Calcium Phosphates/therapeutic use , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Postoperative Complications , Adult , Bone Substitutes/therapeutic use , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/adverse effects , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Dental Restoration Failure/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Maxillary Sinus/pathology , Maxillary Sinus/surgery , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate bone resorption quantitatively during the healing period subsequent to ridge augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients requiring vertical ridge augmentation before implant placement were recruited in the study. The study used an allograft and nonresorbable membrane. A custom acrylic stent was used to measure changes in bone volume. Augmented bone was compared with remaining bone 6 months after guided bone regeneration (α = 0.05 by means of the paired t test). RESULTS: All sites following the six months post-surgery were analyzed. Overall changes in alveolar bone were observed with a mean resorption rate of 19.8% (p<0.001). The vertical bone measurement indicated a mean resorption rate of 22.8% (range = 18.5% - 26.5%). The horizontal measurement indicated a mean resorption rate of 18.7% (range = 12.6% - 26.0%). Among the sixteen sites, four sites with post-operative complications including membrane exposure showed an average of 42.1% resorption rates. CONCLUSION: Loss in graft quantity was observed after ridge augmentation using an allograft and nonresorbable membrane during submerged healing before implant placement. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to confirm its findings.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods , Bone Regeneration/physiology , Bone Resorption/physiopathology , Guided Tissue Regeneration/methods , Mandible/surgery , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Wound Healing/physiology , Bone Transplantation , Female , Humans , Male , Membranes, Artificial , Middle Aged , Polytetrafluoroethylene , Postoperative Complications , Prospective Studies , Vertical DimensionABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that there would be no difference in heat production by reducing the number of drills during the implant site preparation relative to conventional drilling sequence. METHODS: A total of 120 implant site preparations with 3 different diameters (3.6, 4.3, and 4.6 mm) were performed on bovine ribs. Within the same diameter group, half of the preparations were performed by a simplified drilling procedure (pilot drill + final diameter drill) and other half using the conventional drilling protocol (pilot drill followed by graduated series of drills to widen the site). Heat production by different drilling techniques was evaluated by measuring the bone temperature using k-type thermocouple and a sensitive thermometer before and after each drill. RESULTS: Mean for maximum temperature increase during site preparation of the 3.6, 4.3, and 4.6-mm implants was 2.45, 2.60, and 2.95° when the site was prepared by the simplified procedure, whereas it was 2.85, 3.10, and 3.60° for the sites prepared by the conventional technique, respectively. No significant difference in temperature increase was found when implants of the 3 different diameters were prepared either by the conventional or simplified drilling procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The simplified drilling technique produced similar amount of heat comparable to the conventional technique that proved the initial hypothesis.
Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Hot Temperature , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Osteotomy/methods , Animals , Cattle , Dental Instruments , Implants, Experimental , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/instrumentation , Osteotomy/instrumentation , Ribs/surgery , ThermometersABSTRACT
Background: To compare the technique of high speed drilling with irrigation and low speed drilling without irrigation in order to evaluate the success rate and peri-implant bone loss at 12 months of follow-up. Material and Methods: A randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial was carried out in patients requiring dental implants to rehabilitate their unitary edentulism. Patients were recruited from the Oral Surgery Unit of the University of Valencia (Spain) between September 2014 and August 2015. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to two groups: group A (high-speed drilling with irrigation) and group B (low-speed drilling without irrigation). The success rate and peri-implant bone loss were recorded at 12 months of follow-up. Results: Twenty-five patients (9 men and 16 women) with 30 implants were enrolled in the study: 15 implants in group A and 15 implants in group B. The mean bone loss of the implants in group A and group B was 0.83 ± 0.73 mm and 0.62 ± 0.70 mm, respectively (p> 0.05). In the maxilla, the bone loss was 1.04 ± 0.63 mm in group A and 0.71 ± 0.36 mm in group B (p> 0.05), while bone loss in the mandible was 0.59 ± 0.80 mm in group A and 0.69 ± 0.77 mm in group B (p> 0.05). The implant success rate at 12 months was 93.3% in group A and 100% in group B. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study, the low-speed drilling technique presented peri-implant bone loss outcomes similar to those of the conventional drilling technique at 12 months of follow-up (AU)
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Prosthodontics/methods , Dental Implants , Osseointegration , 28599 , Bone Substitutes/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Patients may face functional, aesthetic, and social distress because of the palatal defects. Prosthetic rehabilitation of maxillectomy or developmental defect can be challenging for prosthodontists. Prognosis of the prosthetic appliances can be affected not only by patients' own ability to adapt to the prosthesis but also by the factors like the remaining teeth, bony structure, and existing mucosa. Maxillary defects are usually developed by surgical intercession of the benign or malignant conditions and trauma cases. Speech, mastication and aesthetics can be hampered by any extent of palatal defect. During obturation of palatal/maxillectomy defects, the primary intent of the prosthodontist should be the shutting of the maxillectomy defect and parting of the oral cavity from the sinonasal openings by use of different bulb designs. In the present case, dentogenic concept has been applied while fabricating the two-piece hollow bulb obturator for restoration of the defect. Well known fact about the gravitational force is that it acts on maxillary obturator and reduces its retentive qualities, this can be counteracted to some extent by making the obturator hollow. Dentogenic concept is the skill, training, and procedure of generating the chimera of natural teeth in artificial teeth during prosthodontic restorations.
Subject(s)
Maxilla/surgery , Mouth, Edentulous/rehabilitation , Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Palatal Obturators , Dental Impression Technique , Dental Prosthesis Design , Denture, Partial , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Mouth, Edentulous/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) is commonly employed to reduce the alveolar segments into proper alignment and to improve nasal symmetry in patients with cleft lip and palate. This study examines the periodical progression of NAM treatment over time. 20 patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate were prospectively recruited. A 2 stage NAM treatment protocol was applied. Stage 1 involved adjustment of the alveolar segments (mean age 15.6 days), while Stage 2 added nasal stents and started average 43 days after stage 1. 3D images (n = 241) were obtained prior to NAM initiation and weekly until the end of treatment. The cleft lip area, bilateral nostril areas, and the nostril height and width were measured. Treatment was assessed in the Cleft (C) side and the Non-cleft (N). There was significant difference in the C/N ratio of the nostril area, width, and height at pre-treatment (0.9 ± 0.3, 4.1 ± 1.1, and 0.5 ± 0.2), at the end of stage 1 (1.1 ± 0.3, 2.2 ± 0.6, and 0.8 ± 0.2), and at the end of stage 2 treatment (1.8 ± 0.3, 1.8 ± 0.4, and 1.2 ± 0.1); p < 0.05. Comparative 3D analysis with dense sampling offers a precise methodology for showing effects of NAM treatment. The morphological changes achieved with NAM therapy occur in early treatment phase.
Subject(s)
Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic/methods , Age Factors , Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Lip/therapy , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/therapy , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Infant , Infant, Newborn , MaleABSTRACT
The maxillary sinus augmentation procedure has become a predictable treatment to regenerate bone for implant placement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB (rhPDGF-BB) combined with a deproteinized cancellous bovine bone graft for sinus augmentation. The lateral window approach was used for maxillary sinuses with minimal residual bone. After a healing period of 4 months, dental implants were placed and then restored following a 2-month osseointegration period. The result demonstrated increased bone height and ISQ values and a 100% survival rate. This study indicates that the addition of rhPDGF-BB to deproteinized cancellous bovine bone accelerated the healing period in maxillary sinuses with minimal native bone.