Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
2.
PLoS One ; 15(5): e0232937, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32459799

ABSTRACT

Antibiotic resistance is a global problem affecting both human and animal health. Ensuring the strategic and effective use of antibiotics is paramount to combatting the emergence and spread of resistance. This study explored New York State (NYS) dairy farmers' perceptions regarding antibiotic use in dairy farming and antibiotic resistance. Dairy farmers' perceptions were assessed through semi-structured, in-person interviews. Twenty interviews with farm owners and/or managers of 15 conventional and five USDA certified organic dairy farms with 40 to 2,300 lactating cows were conducted. Thematic analysis was used to assess, compare and contrast transcripts for farmers' characterization of their beliefs, values, and concerns. Conventional dairy farmers had a low level of concern about the possible impacts of on-farm antibiotic resistance on human health and believed their antibiotic use was already judicious. Generally, they believed their cattle's health would suffer if antibiotic use were further curtailed. Conventional farmers expressed frustration over the possibility of more stringent governmental, milk cooperative, buyer, or marketer requirements for antibiotic use and associated animal welfare in the future. They attributed expanding regulations in part to misinformed consumer preferences, that farmers felt were influenced by the marketing of organic dairy products. Organic dairy farmers were generally more concerned about issues related to antibiotic resistance than conventional farmers. Both conventional and organic farmers placed emphasis on disease prevention through herd health management rather than treatment. In conclusion, the conventional NYS dairy farmers in this study were skeptical of the need for and benefits of reduced antibiotic use on their dairy farms. Interventions for farmers, delivered by a trusted source such as a veterinarian, that provide training about proper antibiotic use practices and information of possible financial benefits of refining antibiotic use may hold promise.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Dairying/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Animal Husbandry/methods , Animal Welfare/economics , Animal Welfare/trends , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Consumer Behavior , Farmers/psychology , Farms/trends , New York , Organic Agriculture/trends , Perception , Qualitative Research
3.
Gac. sanit. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 34(1): 4-9, ene.-feb. 2020. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-195408

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the environmental practices of participants in an urban organic community garden at the beginning of their gardening experience and after a period of six months, and to discover their opinion about how this activity influenced the consumption of vegetables, fruits and organic food. METHOD: Interviews using structured questionnaires were conducted twice with 115 city dwellers: when they started in the vegetable garden and about 6 months later. The questionnaire included questions related to environmental practices. The second evaluation also included questions related to the consumption of organic food, vegetables and fruit. RESULTS: This research showed significant behavioural transformation, including positive outcomes in environmental practices such as recycling and trying to persuade friends or family to recycle, compost leftovers or choose to walk/bike to save petrol. In the opinion of the participants, activities in the organic community garden helped to increase consumption of fruits, vegetables and organic food. CONCLUSIONS: The study results reinforce the hypothesis that an organic community vegetable garden can induce significant, positive behavioural changes among its users. In particular this research suggests horticulture is associated with positive improvements in personal environmental behaviours, awareness of the environment's high social priority and increased consumption of organic food, fruit and vegetables


OBJETIVO: Caracterizar las prácticas ambientales de los participantes de un jardín comunitario orgánico urbano al inicio de su experiencia en prácticas agrícolas y después de 6 meses, así como conocer su opinión sobre cómo esta actividad influyó en el consumo de verduras, frutas y alimentos orgánicos. MÉTODO: Las entrevistas con cuestionarios estructurados se realizaron dos veces a 115 habitantes de la ciudad: cuando comenzaron en la huerta y unos 6 meses después. El cuestionario incluyó preguntas relacionadas con las prácticas ambientales. La segunda evaluación incluyó también preguntas sobre el consumo de alimentos orgánicos, verduras y frutas. RESULTADOS: Se observó una transformación conductual significativa, incluidos resultados positivos en prácticas ambientales como el reciclaje e intentar que amigos o familiares reciclen, la composta de sobras o elegir caminar o ir en bicicleta para ahorrar gasolina. En opinión de los participantes, las prácticas agrícolas de la comunidad orgánica contribuyeron a aumentar el consumo de frutas, verduras y alimentos orgánicos. CONCLUSIÓN: Los resultados del estudio refuerzan la hipótesis de que un huerto comunitario orgánico puede inducir cambios conductuales significativos entre sus usuarios. En particular, esta investigación sugiere que la horticultura se asocia con mejoras positivas en los comportamientos ambientales y la conciencia de la alta prioridad social del medio ambiente y un mayor consumo de alimentos orgánicos, frutas y verduras


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , 24444 , Food, Organic/analysis , Organic Agriculture/trends , 24457 , Ecological Development , Sustainable Agriculture , Fruit/supply & distribution , Vegetables/supply & distribution , Community Participation/trends , Disease Prevention
4.
PLoS One ; 14(2): e0211199, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30730913

ABSTRACT

Consumer spending on organic food products has grown rapidly. Some claim that organics have ecological, equity, and health advantages over conventional food and therefore should be subsidized. Here we explore the distributive impacts of an organic fruit subsidy that reduces the retail price of organic fruit in the US by 10 percent. We estimate the impact of the subsidy on organic fruit demand in a representative poor, middle income, and rich US household using three analytical methods; including two econometric and one machine learning. We do not find strong evidence of regressive redistribution due to our simulated organic fruit subsidy; the poor household's relative reaction to the subsidy is not much different than the reaction at the other two households. However, the infra-marginal savings from the subsidy tend to be larger in richer households.


Subject(s)
Food, Organic/economics , Fruit/economics , Organic Agriculture/economics , Commerce/economics , Commerce/statistics & numerical data , Commerce/trends , Computer Simulation , Consumer Behavior/economics , Consumer Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Financing, Government/economics , Financing, Government/statistics & numerical data , Food, Organic/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Income/statistics & numerical data , Machine Learning , Organic Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , Organic Agriculture/trends , United States
6.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao ; 27(4): 1303-1313, 2016 Apr 22.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29732789

ABSTRACT

This paper introduced the concepts of organic agriculture as defined by different international organizations, origin and theoretical development of organic agriculture, as well as its developing trajectory in China (i.e. a late start followed by rapid growth compared to developed countries). The differences between domestic and international organic agriculture were illustrated by scale, crop types, production standards, inputs and planting techniques. Constraints limiting improvements to organic agriculture in aspects of standards, technology, marketing, certification, environmental pollution, enterprise reputation, and national policies were discussed. Future directions and strategies for developing healthy organic agriculture in China were provided.


Subject(s)
Organic Agriculture , China , Environmental Pollution , Organic Agriculture/standards , Organic Agriculture/trends
8.
Proc Nutr Soc ; 74(1): 83-8, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25221987

ABSTRACT

The greatest challenge for agriculture is to reduce the trade-offs between productivity and long-term sustainability. Therefore, it is interesting to analyse organic agriculture which is a given set of farm practices that emphasise ecological sustainability. Organic agriculture can be characterised as being less driven by off-farm inputs and being better embedded in ecosystem functions. The literature on public goods and non-commodity outputs of organic farms is overwhelming. Most publications address the positive effects of organic farming on soil fertility, biodiversity maintenance and protection of the natural resources of soil, water and air. As a consequence of focusing on public goods, organic agriculture is less productive. Meta-analyses show that organic agriculture yields range between 0·75 and 0·8 of conventional agriculture. Best practice examples from disadvantaged sites and climate conditions show equal or, in the case of subsistence farming in Sub-Saharan Africa, higher productivity of organic agriculture. Hence, organic agriculture is likely to be a good model for productive and sustainable food production. Underfunding in R&D addressing specific bottlenecks of organic agriculture are the main cause for both crop and livestock yield gaps. Therefore, the potential for improving the performance of organic agriculture through agricultural research is huge. Although organic farming is a niche in most countries, it is at the verge of becoming mainstream in leading European countries. Consumer demand has grown over the past two decades and does not seem to be a limiting factor for the future development of organic agriculture.


Subject(s)
Conservation of Natural Resources/trends , Food, Organic , Organic Agriculture/trends
10.
J Sci Food Agric ; 94(13): 2600-4, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24436145

ABSTRACT

Although several meta-analysis studies have been published comparing the quality of food derived from organic and non-organic origin, it is still not clear if food from organic production per se can guarantee product-related added value to consumers. This paper aims to summarize the status quo in order to identify research gaps and suggest future research challenges. Organic food is described according to a quality model already published. The influence of organic production on food quality is structured in primary production and processing. Furthermore, organic food authentication is discussed. Organic food seems to contain fewer pesticide residues and statistically more selected health-related compounds such as polyphenols in plant products and polyunsaturated fatty acids in milk and meat products, but the health relevance for consumers is not clear yet. Comparing food from organic origin with so called 'conventional' food seems not to be appropriate, because 'conventional' is not defined. In organic food quality research a system approach is needed from which systemic markers can be selected. Research on the impact of processing technologies on the quality according to organic principles seems of high relevance, since most of the food is processed.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Consumer Advocacy , Food Quality , Food, Organic , Models, Biological , Organic Agriculture/methods , Animal Feed/analysis , Animal Feed/standards , Animal Husbandry/standards , Animal Husbandry/trends , Animal Welfare/trends , Animals , Biomarkers/analysis , Consumer Advocacy/trends , Food Analysis/methods , Food Analysis/standards , Food Handling/methods , Food Handling/standards , Food Inspection/methods , Food Inspection/standards , Food Inspection/trends , Food, Organic/analysis , Food, Organic/standards , Humans , Organic Agriculture/standards , Organic Agriculture/trends
11.
Nutr. hosp ; 28(6): 1761-1769, nov.-dic. 2013.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-120378

ABSTRACT

El informe del Bellagio sobre Agricultura Saludable, Nutrición Saludable, Población Saludable es el resultado de la reunión mantenida en el Centro Bellagio de la Fundación Rockefeller en el Lago de Como en Italia, entre el 29 de Octubre y el 2 de Noviembre de 2012. La reunión basada en la ciencia, fue orientada hacia la política. Se discutió extensamente el papel y la cantidad de grasas saludables y perjudiciales, con atención al contenido relativo de los ácidos grasos omega-3 y omega-6, el azúcar, y particularmente la fructosa en los alimentos que pueden conllevar la epidemia de enfermedades no transmisibles (EnT) a través del mundo. El informe concluye que el consumo del azúcar, especialmente en forma de fructosa de alta energía utiizada en bebidas refrescantes, posee una amenaza muy importante de la salud, especialmente en niños, y la mayoría de las dietas, aunque con diferencias regionales, son deficientes en ácidos grasos omega-3 y demasiado altas en ácidos grasos omega-6. Las interacciones gen-nutriente en el crecimiento y desarrollo y en la prevención de la enfermedad son fundamentales para la salud, por lo que deberían establecerse a través de todo el mundo Centros regionales de Genética, Nutrición y Condición Física para la Salud. Los jefes de estado y gobierno deben priorizar dentro de sus nacionales de forma urgente la Nutrición, cuyo acceso a una dieta saludable debería considerarse un derecho humano y dirigir la responsabilidad para que la Nutrición tenga un lugar en los Ministerios de Salud, más que la agricultura de modo que los requerimientos de salud conduzcan a prioridades agrícolas, y no viceversa. La seguridad nutricional debería ser considerada como prioridad como lo es la seguridad alimentaria (AU)


The Bellagio Report on Healthy Agriculture, Healthy Nutrition, Healthy People is the result of the meeting held at the Rockefeller Foundation Bellagio Center in Lake Como, Italy, 29 October-2 November 2012. The meeting was science-based but policy-oriented. The role and amount of healthy and unhealthy fats, with attention to the relative content of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, sugar, and particularly fructose in foods that may underlie the epidemics of non-communicable diseases (NCD's) worldwide were extensively discussed. The report concludes that sugar consumption, especially in the form of high energy fructose in soft drinks, poses a major and insidious health threat, especially in children, and most diets, although with regional differences, are deficient in omega-3 fatty acids and too high in omega-6 fatty acids. Gene-nutrient interactions in growth and development and in disease prevention are fundamental to health, therefore regional Centers on Genetics, Nutrition and Fitness for Health should be established worldwide. Heads of state and government must elevate, as a matter of urgency, Nutrition as a national priority, that access to a healthy diet should be considered a human right and that the lead responsibility for Nutrition should be placed in Ministries of Health rather than agriculture so that the health requirements drive agricultural priorities, not vice versa. Nutritional security should be given the same priority as food security (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Whole Foods/analysis , Healthy People Programs/organization & administration , Organic Agriculture/trends , Food Supply , Nutrition Programs and Policies , Nutrigenomics/trends , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/therapeutic use , Fatty Acids, Omega-6/therapeutic use , Fructose/therapeutic use , Congresses as Topic
12.
J Sci Food Agric ; 93(5): 1191-7, 2013 Mar 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22987539

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Understanding the nitrogen (N) use efficiency and N input/output balance in the agricultural system is crucial for best management of N fertilisers in China. RESULTS: In the last 60 years, N fertiliser consumption correlated positively with grain production. During that period the partial factor productivity of N (PFPN ) declined greatly from more than 1000 kg grain kg⁻¹ N in the 1950s to nearly 30 kg grain kg⁻¹ N in 2008. This change in PFPN could be largely explained by the increase in N rate. The average agronomic efficiency of fertiliser N (AEN ) for rice, wheat and maize during 2000-2010 was 12.6, 8.3 and 11.5 kg kg⁻¹ respectively, which was similar to that in the early 1980s but lower than that in the early 1960s. Estimation based on statistical data showed that a total of 49.16 × 106 t of N was input into Chinese agriculture, of which chemical N, organic fertiliser N, biological fixed N and other sources accounted for 58.2, 24.3, 10.5 and 7.0% respectively. Nitrogen was surplus in all regions, the total N surplus being 10.6 × 106 t (60.6 kg ha⁻¹). CONCLUSION: The great challenge is to balance the use of current N fertilisers between regions and crops to improve N use efficiency while maintaining or increasing crop production under the high-intensity agricultural system of China.


Subject(s)
Crops, Agricultural/growth & development , Crops, Agricultural/metabolism , Edible Grain/growth & development , Edible Grain/metabolism , Fertilizers/analysis , Nitrogen/metabolism , Soil/chemistry , Agriculture/trends , China , Manure/analysis , Nitrogen/analysis , Organic Agriculture/trends , Oryza/growth & development , Oryza/metabolism , Spatio-Temporal Analysis , Triticum/growth & development , Triticum/metabolism , Zea mays/growth & development , Zea mays/metabolism
13.
Ambio ; 42(3): 334-43, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23055273

ABSTRACT

Large-scale, monoculture production systems dependent on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, increase yields, but are costly and have deleterious impacts on human health and the environment. This research investigates variations in banana production practices in Costa Rica, to identify alternative systems that combine high productivity and profitability, with reduced reliance on agrochemicals. Farm workers were observed during daily production activities; 39 banana producers and 8 extension workers/researchers were interviewed; and a review of field experiments conducted by the National Banana Corporation between 1997 and 2002 was made. Correspondence analysis showed that there is no structured variation in large-scale banana producers' practices, but two other banana production systems were identified: a small-scale organic system and a small-scale conventional coffee-banana intercropped system. Field-scale research may reveal ways that these practices can be scaled up to achieve a productive and profitable system producing high-quality export bananas with fewer or no pesticides.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Conservation of Natural Resources , Crops, Agricultural/growth & development , Musa/growth & development , Agriculture/methods , Agriculture/organization & administration , Agriculture/trends , Costa Rica , Fertilizers/analysis , Organic Agriculture/methods , Organic Agriculture/organization & administration , Organic Agriculture/trends , Pesticides/analysis , Weed Control/methods , Weed Control/organization & administration , Weed Control/trends
14.
Pest Manag Sci ; 68(12): 1523-36, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23109262

ABSTRACT

Spinosyn-based products, mostly spinosad, have been widely recommended by extension specialists and agribusiness companies; consequently, they have been used to control various pests in many different cropping systems. Following the worldwide adoption of spinosad-based products for integrated and organic farming, an increasing number of ecotoxicological studies have been published in the past 10 years. These studies are primarily related to the risk assessment of spinosad towards beneficial arthropods. This review takes into account recent data with the aim of (i) highlighting potentially adverse effects of spinosyns on beneficial arthropods (and hence on ecosystem services that they provide in agroecosystems), (ii) clarifying the range of methods used to address spinosyn side effects on biocontrol agents and pollinators in order to provide new insights for the development of more accurate bioassays, (iii) identifying pitfalls when analysing laboratory results to assess field risks and (iv) gaining increasing knowledge on side effects when using spinosad for integrated pest management (IPM) programmes and organic farming. For the first time, a thorough review of possible risks of spinosad and novel spinosyns (such as spinetoram) to beneficial arthropods (notably natural enemies and pollinators) is provided. The acute lethal effect and multiple sublethal effects have been identified in almost all arthropod groups studied. This review will help to optimise the future use of spinosad and new spinosyns in IPM programmes and for organic farming, notably by preventing the possible side effects of spinosyns on beneficial arthropods.


Subject(s)
Arthropods/drug effects , Insecticides/toxicity , Macrolides/toxicity , Animals , Biological Control Agents , Drug Combinations , Environmental Exposure , Organic Agriculture/methods , Organic Agriculture/trends , Pest Control/methods , Pest Control/trends , Species Specificity
15.
GM Crops ; 2(3): 138-43, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22179192

ABSTRACT

The objective of this paper is to analyze the way of Portugal is addressing the issue of the coexistence between conventional, organic and Genetically Modified (GM) crops production. In the EU, no form of agriculture, be it conventional, organic or transgenic, should be excluded. Farmers are free to choose the production type they prefer, without being forced to change patterns already established in the area and without spending more resources. Farmers' choice of growing GM or non-GM crops depends not only on technical aspects related to the productivity gains and agronomic benefits to be gained from adopting this technology, but also on consumers' preferences. Today only few Member States have adopted specific legislation on coexistence. Portugal was one of the first European Country that, in 2005, adopted a coexistence law and it has implemented one of the most complete systems of coexistence regulation. Today Portugal has a well-balanced regime based on free choice for consumers and growers. It has a coexistence system complete regulation and farmers who wish to cultivate GM maize must fulfill with national coexistence legislation that includes the following compulsory rules: participate in specific coexistence training courses, register the cultivation area, inform by written notification about their intent to cultivate GM, apply measures of coexistence, among others.


Subject(s)
Agriculture/methods , Crops, Agricultural/growth & development , Organic Agriculture/methods , Plants, Genetically Modified/growth & development , Agriculture/trends , Crops, Agricultural/genetics , Legislation, Food/trends , Organic Agriculture/trends , Plants, Genetically Modified/genetics , Portugal
16.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 43(4): 749-57, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21222224

ABSTRACT

Development in organic farming has been stimulated by farmers and consumers becoming interested in healthy food products and sustainable environment. Organic agriculture is a holistic production management system which is based on the principles of health, ecology, care, and fairness. Organic development in Uganda has focused more on the crop sector than livestock sector and has primarily involved the private sector, like organic products export companies and non-governmental organizations. Agriculture in Uganda and many African countries is predominantly traditional, less mechanized, and is usually associated with minimum use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and drugs. This low external input agriculture also referred to as "organic by default" can create basis for organic farming where agroecological methods are introduced and present an alternative in terms of intensification to the current low-input/low-output systems. Traditional farming should not be confused with organic farming because in some cases, the existing traditional practices have consequences like overstocking and less attention to soil improvement as well as to animal health and welfare, which is contrary to organic principles of ecology, fairness, health, and care. Challenges of implementing sustainable organic practices in the Ugandan livestock sector threaten its future development, such as vectors and vector-borne diseases, organic feed insufficiency, limited education, research, and support to organic livestock production. The prospects of organic livestock development in Uganda can be enhanced with more scientific research in organic livestock production under local conditions and strengthening institutional support.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry , Livestock/growth & development , Organic Agriculture/methods , Poultry/growth & development , Animals , Conservation of Natural Resources , Livestock/parasitology , Organic Agriculture/trends , Uganda
17.
Rev Sci Tech ; 30(3): 969-83, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22435208

ABSTRACT

Agrochemicals, veterinary drugs, antibiotics and improved feeds can increase the food supply while minimising production costs in various livestock production systems around the world. However, these days, quality-conscious consumers are increasingly seeking environmentally safe, chemical-residue-free healthy foods, along with product traceability and a high standard of animal welfare, which organic production methods are said to ensure. Organic production is not only a challenge for producers in developing countries, it offers new export opportunities as well. Organic agriculture is practised by 1.8 million producers in 160 countries, and production of organically grown food continues to increase steadily by 15% per year. Most tropical countries are now exporting organic agricultural products but, apart from organic beef from Brazil and Argentina, organic livestock products are yetto take off. Most trade in organic livestock products is restricted to the European Union and other developed nations. Nevertheless, tropical countries cannot afford to neglect this emerging system of animal production. Organic production is knowledge- and management-intensive. Producers must be well versed in organic production standards, principles and practices, which require a high degree of knowledge and skill. In organic production, it is not simply the final product but the whole production process that must be inspected and approved by the accredited certification bodies. Organic livestock farming is still evolving, and further research is needed to make it sustainable. In this paper, the authors review the prospects of organic animal husbandry and its possible constraints in developing and tropical countries.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Livestock/physiology , Organic Agriculture/standards , Animal Husbandry/standards , Animal Husbandry/trends , Animal Welfare , Animals , Crops, Agricultural/growth & development , Crops, Agricultural/standards , Developing Countries , Livestock/growth & development , Organic Agriculture/methods , Organic Agriculture/trends , Tropical Climate
18.
J Environ Manage ; 91(12): 2717-26, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20702020

ABSTRACT

This article examines the characteristics of and reasons for Norwegian farmers' ceasing or planning to cease certified organic production. We gathered cross-sectional survey data in late 2007 from organic farmers deregistering between January 2004 and September 2007 (n=220), and similar data from a random sample of farmers with certified organic management in 2006 (n=407). Of the respondents deregistering by November 2007, 17% had quit farming altogether, 61% now farmed conventionally, and 21% were still farming by organic principles, but without certification. Nearly one in four organic farmers in 2007 indicated that they planned to cease certification within the next 5-10 years. From the two survey samples, we categorised farmers who expect to be deregistered in 5-10 years into three groups: conventional practices (n=139), continuing to farm using organic principles (uncertified organic deregistrants, n=105), and stopped farming (n=33). Of the numerous differences among these groups, two were most striking: the superior sales of uncertified organic deregistrants through consumer-direct marketing and the lowest shares of organic land among conventional deregistrants. We summarised a large number of reasons for deregistering into five factors through factor analysis: economics, regulations, knowledge-exchange, production, and market access. Items relating to economics and regulations were the primary reasons offered for opting out. The regression analysis showed that the various factors were associated with several explanatory variables. Regulations, for example, figured more highly among livestock farmers than crop farmers. The economic factor strongly reflected just a few years of organic management. Policy recommendations for reducing the number of dropouts are to focus on economics, environmental attitudes, and the regulatory issues surrounding certified organic production.


Subject(s)
Organic Agriculture/trends , Adult , Attitude , Environment , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Norway , Organic Agriculture/legislation & jurisprudence , Organic Agriculture/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...