Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
J Contin Educ Health Prof ; 39(3): 161-167, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31318721

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of orthoptists when examining the optic disc for signs of glaucoma, and to explore the impact of targeted clinical education on accuracy. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 42 monoscopic color optic disc images were presented to 46 orthoptists who assessed the likelihood of glaucoma as well as optic disc size, shape, tilting, vertical cup-to-disc ratio, cup shape, depth, presence of hemorrhage, peripapillary atrophy, and retinal nerve fiber layer. The level of agreement with specialist ophthalmologists was assessed. Participants were then randomly assigned to an experimental group (targeted postgraduate education on optic disc assessment) or to no intervention. The educational program was designed to increase knowledge of the characteristic features associated with glaucomatous optic neuropathy. All participants re-examined the included optic disc images after a period of 6 to 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was a change in agreement between attempts. RESULTS: The education group showed significant improvements between attempts for identifying hemorrhages (P = .013), retinal nerve fiber layer defects (0.035), disc size (P = .001), peripapillary atrophy (P = .030), and glaucoma likelihood (P = .023). The control group did not show any statistically significant improvement. The intervention group showed significantly more improvement when identifying hemorrhages (P = .013), disc size (P = .001), disc shape (P = .033), and cup shape (P = .020) compared with the control group. DISCUSSION: Orthoptists who received additional postgraduate online education based on principles of adult learning were more accurate at assessing the optic disc for glaucoma. These results highlight the value of continuing education to optimize clinical practice in allied health professionals.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma/diagnosis , Optic Disk/abnormalities , Orthoptics/standards , Adult , Clinical Competence/standards , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Educational Measurement/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Orthoptics/methods , Orthoptics/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching/standards , Teaching/statistics & numerical data
2.
Am Orthopt J ; 66(1): 98-106, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27799583

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: To investigate the level of agreement between orthoptists and medical practitioners in the comprehensive eye examination of children seen in an orthoptist-led triage clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient records over a 6-month period were retrospectively reviewed. Those with a presenting complaint related to vision or ocular motility were triaged into the orthoptist-led clinic and included in the study. Patients who did not meet the triage protocol and those who were not assessed by a medical practitioner at a subsequent appointment were excluded from analysis. The clinical findings from the orthoptist and medical practitioner were collected and compared. RESULTS: In total, sixty-three patients were reviewed during the 6-month period and met the inclusion criteria. After the initial comprehensive eye examination with an orthoptist, thirty-two were discharged from hospital and thirty-one were asked to return for a review appointment with a medical practitioner. Agreement between the orthoptists and medical practitioners for the diagnosis of strabismus and/or amblyopia was 84.6% (κ = 0.649, P < 0.001). There was strong agreement between orthoptists and medical practitioners for refractive error of the right eye [τ (19) = 0.352, P = 0.729] and left eye [τ (19) = 1.785, P = 0.090]. Fundus examination comparisons between the orthoptists and medical practitioners showed very high agreement (95.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Orthoptists have the skills necessary to provide comprehensive care of children referred for ocular motility and/or vision related disorders. There was close agreement between orthoptists and medical practitioners when performing comprehensive eye examinations.


Subject(s)
Amblyopia/diagnosis , Clinical Competence/standards , Ophthalmologists/standards , Orthoptics/standards , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Strabismus/diagnosis , Vision Screening/standards , Child , Child, Preschool , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
3.
Am Orthopt J ; 64: 76-80, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25313115

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The double Maddox rod is a commonly used instrument to test for cyclotorsion in the clinical setting. This paper assesses the ability of patients without torsional complaint to accurately demonstrate torsional status with varying degrees of induced hypertropia as tested by double Maddox rod. METHODS: Thirty-seven orthophoric subjects underwent double Maddox rod testing with vertical prism of 3(Δ), 10(Δ), 16(Δ), 20(Δ), and 30(Δ). Subjective torsion was recorded for each prism diopter. RESULTS: Mean subjective torsion was recorded as 0.95°, 1.6°, 1.9°, 2.1°, and 2.2° for 3(Δ), 10(Δ), 16(Δ), 20(Δ), and 30(Δ), respectively. Torsion increased in a logarithmic manner as modeled by R™ software version 2.15.2. CONCLUSIONS: The double Maddox rod test as commonly used in clinical practice is both subjective and prone to administrator and subject error. Subjects have more difficulty properly aligning the double Maddox rod as distance between images is increased. It is also possible that recruitment of the oblique muscles during attempted vertical fusion leads to subjective torsion during double Maddox rod testing in otherwise normal participants.


Subject(s)
Optical Devices/standards , Orthoptics/instrumentation , Orthoptics/standards , Strabismus/diagnosis , Torsion Abnormality/diagnosis , Adult , Eye Movements/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Oculomotor Muscles/physiology , Reproducibility of Results , Strabismus/physiopathology , Torsion Abnormality/physiopathology , Young Adult
6.
Strabismus ; 21(3): 169-74, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23978144

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Screening programs to detect visual abnormalities in children vary among countries. The aim of this study is to describe experts' perception of best practice guidelines and competency framework for visual screening in children. METHODS: A qualitative focus group technique was applied during the Portuguese national orthoptic congress to obtain the perception of an expert panel of 5 orthoptists and 2 ophthalmologists with experience in visual screening for children (mean age 53.43 years, SD ± 9.40). The panel received in advance a script with the description of three tuning competencies dimensions (instrumental, systemic, and interpersonal) for visual screening. The session was recorded in video and audio. Qualitative data were analyzed using a categorical technique. RESULTS: According to experts' views, six tests (35.29%) have to be included in a visual screening: distance visual acuity test, cover test, bi-prism or 4/6(Δ) prism, fusion, ocular movements, and refraction. Screening should be performed according to the child age before and after 3 years of age (17.65%). The expert panel highlighted the influence of the professional experience in the application of a screening protocol (23.53%). They also showed concern about the false negatives control (23.53%). Instrumental competencies were the most cited (54.09%), followed by interpersonal (29.51%) and systemic (16.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Orthoptists should have professional experience before starting to apply a screening protocol. False negative results are a concern that has to be more thoroughly investigated. The proposed framework focuses on core competencies highlighted by the expert panel. Competencies programs could be important do develop better screening programs.


Subject(s)
Amblyopia/diagnosis , Expert Testimony/methods , Orthoptics/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Vision Screening/standards , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Vision Tests , Visual Acuity
7.
J AAPOS ; 16(1): 49-52, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22237670

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of orthoptist referrals from a preschool-based vision screening program for children 3-4 years of age and to report the outcomes of referred children. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of records of participants in the preschool vision screening program in the Walsall, United Kingdom, area for the 2006-2007 school year. Screening examinations were performed by orthoptists and included assessment of visual acuity, ocular alignment, ocular motility, and stereoacuity. RESULTS: For the 2006-2007 school year, 2,830 of 3,623 children (78%) were screened, Of these, 413 were referred to the Hospital Eye Service. Comparison of the screening results and the Hospital Eye Service examination revealed that recorded visual acuities were similar in 81% of subjects and ocular alignment in 94%. Visual acuity was 6/9 or better at the hospital examination in 87% of referred children, with 46% requiring spectacle use only; 17% of referrals were diagnosed with amblyopia. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Walsall vision screening program diverged from UK national guidelines by testing at an earlier age, there was no evidence that earlier screening led to a large number of incorrect referrals, and early screening may allow for better outcomes. Sensitivity of screening was not tested, and orthoptist screening in the United Kingdom is likely to be more accurate in this age group than nonspecialist or lay screening that is performed in many other areas.


Subject(s)
Orthoptics/standards , Referral and Consultation/standards , Vision Disorders/diagnosis , Vision Screening/standards , Amblyopia/diagnosis , Amblyopia/physiopathology , Child, Preschool , England , Eyeglasses/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Ocular Motility Disorders/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Strabismus/diagnosis , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Visual Acuity/physiology
8.
Eye (Lond) ; 25(2): 161-7, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21127506

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate accuracy of referrals from multidisciplinary stroke teams requesting visual assessments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multicentre prospective study undertaken in 20 acute Trust hospitals. Stroke survivors referred with suspected visual difficulty were recruited. Standardised screening/referral and investigation forms were used to document data on referral signs and symptoms, plus type and extent of visual impairment. RESULTS: Referrals for 799 patients were reviewed: 60% men, 40% women. Mean age at onset of stroke was 69 years (SD 14: range 1-94 years). Signs recorded by referring staff were nil in 58% and positive in the remainder. Symptoms were recorded in 87%. Diagnosis of visual impairment was nil in 8% and positive in the remainder. Sensitivity of referrals (on the basis of signs detected) was calculated as 0.42 with specificity of 0.52. Kappa statistical evaluation of agreement between referral and diagnosis of visual impairment was 0.428 (SE 0.017: 95% confidence interval of -0.048, 0.019). CONCLUSION: More than half of patient referrals were made despite no signs of visual difficulty being recorded by the referring staff. Visual impairment of varying severity was diagnosed in 92% of stroke survivors referred for visual assessment. Referrals were made based predominantly on visual symptoms and because of formal orthoptic liaison in Trusts involved.


Subject(s)
Orthoptics/standards , Referral and Consultation , Stroke/complications , Vision Disorders/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Referral and Consultation/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vision Disorders/etiology , Young Adult
9.
J AAPOS ; 14(6): 478-83, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21168070

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of the autorefractor Retinomax K-plus2 and the photoscreener plusoptiX S08 in measuring refractive errors by comparing them with cycloplegic retinoscopy (CR) and to assess limitations associated with their use. METHODS: Cross-sectional study to compare data from CR, performed by an orthoptist, to data from Retinomax K-plus2 and plusoptiX S08 performed by a lay screener. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of significant refractive errors were determined according to American Academy of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus criteria. RESULTS: Two hundred children were included, with a mean age of 5.2 ± 2.6 years (3 months to 11 years). Compared to CR, the plusoptiX S08 showed a mean difference of -1.13 ± 1.25 D (95% limits of agreement [LOA], -3.59 to +1.32) for spherical equivalent (SE) and -0.23 ± 0.53 D (LOA, -1.28 to +0.81) for the cylinder. Mean difference for the Retinomax K-plus2 before cycloplegia was -0.08 ± 0.58 D (LOA, -1.23 to +1.06) for SE and 0.03 ± 0.38 D (LOA, -0.72 to +0.78) for the cylinder; after cycloplegia -2.11 ± 1.64 D (LOA, -5.33 to +1.10) for SE and -0.06 ± 0.47 D (LOA, -0.98 to +0.86) for the cylinder. Sensitivity for detecting hyperopia >3.5 D with the plusoptiX S08 was 33.3%, the Retinomax before cycloplegia 31.0% and after cycloplegia 84.6% and high for detecting myopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia. CONCLUSIONS: Retinomax K-plus2 and plusoptiX S08 have high sensitivity for the detection of myopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy; however, when used without cycloplegia, hyperopia is underestimated.


Subject(s)
Ophthalmology/standards , Orthoptics/standards , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Retinoscopy/methods , Vision Screening , Anisometropia/diagnosis , Astigmatism/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Hyperopia/diagnosis , Infant , Mydriatics , Myopia/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vision Screening/instrumentation , Vision Screening/methods , Vision Screening/standards
11.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 213(4): 220-9, 1998 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9848067

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to investigate the computer aided screening method using Purkinje image I and IV reflection patterns for the detection of inapparent eye misalignment and to compare this to an orthoptic examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 590 subjects up to 72 months of age with inapparent eye misalignment were recruited from the orthoptic outpatient department and externally. The computer aided screening consisted of taking a series of still video pictures with Purkinje reflection patterns. These were evaluated in an examiner independent way to reach a recommendation whether the child needed an ophthalmological referral or not. As gold standard, an orthoptic examination was performed. For analysis, the data were split by age groups. The orthoptic results were tested for certainty and repeatability. RESULTS: The computer aided examination had the highest sensitivity of 0.82 in the age group up to 2.5 years of age, and a specificity of 0.90. With an estimated prevalence for microtropia of 0.01, the extrapolated positive predictive value was 0.08, and the negative predictive value was 0.998. In the age group up to 2.5 years of age, the percentage of orthoptic examinations without clear result (neither non-referral, nor strabismic) was 22.4%, and 6.1% in the screening examination. Among the cases which were examined repeatedly, some were classified as "strabismic" in the beginning, and as "non-referral" in the end in the orthoptic examinations. CONCLUSIONS: The examiner independent, computer aided screening method is a cost effective option for the screening for inapparent eye misalignment, especially in the age group up to 2.5 years of age. If an orthoptic examination was carried out for screening, one should expect a higher rate of false positives, which entails more costly ophthalmological checks. Future studies should assess the validity of the single ortoptic examination as the gold standard in this age group.


Subject(s)
Orthoptics/methods , Strabismus/diagnosis , Amblyopia/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Humans , Infant , Mass Screening/methods , Orthoptics/standards , Pilot Projects
12.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 236(11): 801-5, 1998 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9825254

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Screening for amblyogenic factors in infancy by pediatricians is unsatisfactory, as they hardly ever detect ametropia or microstrabismus. As photoscreening seems to be a helpful method to detect even small squint angles and refractive errors, we tested the MTI photoscreener for its sensitivity with respect to amblyogenic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and twelve children aged 6-48 months were first examined with the MTI photoscreener. Then each child underwent complete medical examination by an ophthalmologist and an orthoptist. The examination included the Hirschberg test (corneal reflex evaluation), the Brückner test (fundus red reflex), and, where possible, the Lang stereotest, the cover test and visual acuity assessment, as well as a motility test, biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy in mydriasis and refractometry in cycloplegia. Exclusion criteria were any organic pathological results, manifest strabismus, ametropia > or = 2 D and astigmatism > or = 1 D. An orthoptist, a pediatrician and two ophthalmologists independently evaluated the Polaroid pictures according to the criteria given in the handbook of the MTI photoscreener. RESULTS: For 10 children the evaluation with the MTI photoscreener was not possible despite the fact that photographs were retaken several times. Thirteen photographs showing obvious pathologic findings despite their poor quality were included. Eighty-three of the remaining 102 children failed the eye examination according to the above-mentioned criteria. The mean sensitivity of the MTI photoscreener was determined to be 82.8%. The ability to correctly identify the absence of any amblyogenic factors (specificity) was 61.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity was high when compared to the usually low detection rate during pediatric examinations. Due to the low specificity, effectiveness was poor. Therefore an ophthalmological examination should be included in the preventive screening during infancy and early childhood.


Subject(s)
Amblyopia/diagnosis , Photography/methods , Vision Screening/methods , Amblyopia/etiology , Child, Preschool , Corneal Diseases/complications , Corneal Diseases/diagnosis , Eye Diseases/complications , Eye Diseases/diagnosis , Humans , Infant , Ophthalmology/standards , Orthoptics/standards , Pediatrics/standards , Refractive Errors/complications , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Strabismus/complications , Strabismus/diagnosis , Vitreous Body/pathology
13.
Prosthet Orthot Int ; 19(1): 31-6, 1995 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7617456

ABSTRACT

BS5750 is the British Standard on "Quality Systems". Its equivalent in European Standards is EN29000 and in the International Standards Organisation ISO9000. This paper points out that these standards lay down formalised procedures and require documentation but do not ipso facto lead to quality assurance. The author points to the Japanese post-war industrial success as being an example of Total Quality Management within the framework provided by the philosophy of Dr. W. Edwards Deming (1988 and 1993). This philosophy on the management of "systems" to provide high quality products and services is briefly outlined. The author argues that improvement in prosthetic and orthotic services will not be reached through implementation of BS5750 but rather through radical rethinking and the adoption and application of the Deming philosophy.


Subject(s)
Orthoptics/standards , Orthotic Devices/standards , Prostheses and Implants/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , England
14.
Health Trends ; 24(4): 157-61, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10123988

ABSTRACT

This paper describes changes in the pattern of new referrals of children from birth to 2 years-of-age to the Hospital Eye Service in Oxford, following the implementation of a community-based orthoptic secondary vision-screening programme. The findings show that the number of false positive referrals was reduced by a half following the introduction of the service; false-positive referrals were also discharged sooner. This paper reports the findings of this survey and the results demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of the programme compared to outpatient attendance.


Subject(s)
Orthoptics/standards , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Vision Screening/standards , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Community Health Services/standards , Community Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Data Collection , Decision Making , Diagnostic Errors , England , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/economics , Strabismus/prevention & control , Utilization Review , Vision Screening/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...