Daptomycin Plus Oxacillin for Persistent Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

BACKGROUND: The preferred antibiotic salvage regimen for persistent methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MSSAB) is unclear. Ertapenem with cefazolin or an antistaphylococcal penicillin has been primarily described, but identifying alternative carbapenem-sparing options may support antibiotic stewardship efforts and decrease the risk of antibiotic-associated Clostridioides difficile infection. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin plus oxacillin (D/O) for persistent MSSAB. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort of patients with persistent MSSAB who received D/O between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2023. Adult patients were included if they had blood cultures positive for MSSA ≥72 hours and received D/O combination for ≥48 hours. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, incarcerated, or received another antibiotic considered to have excellent activity against MSSA. The primary outcome was time to MSSA bacteremia clearance post-daptomycin initiation. Secondary outcomes included microbiological cure, hospital length of stay, 90-day all-cause mortality, MSSA bacteremia-related mortality, 90-day readmission for MSSAB, and incidence of antibiotic-associated adverse effects. Time to MSSAB clearance post-D/O initiation was plotted using Kaplan-Meier estimation. RESULTS: Seven unique patient encounters were identified including 4 with endocarditis. Despite a median MSSA bacteremia duration of 7.8 days, median clearance was 2 days post-daptomycin initiation. All achieved microbiological cure, and no adverse effects were reported. Ninety-day all-cause mortality, MSSAB-related mortality, and 90-day readmission for MSSAB occurred in 28.6%, 14.3%, and 14.3% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: D/O was an effective, well-tolerated salvage regimen in this cohort and may represent a carbapenem-sparing option for persistent MSSAB.

Um raro caso de vasculite leucocitoclástica induzida por oxacilina / A rare case of oxacillin-induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis

A vasculite leucocitoclástica é uma patologia cujos mecanismos estão associados ao processo de inflamação vascular. Estima-se que até 24% dos casos de vasculite estão relacionados ao uso de fármacos, sendo os antimicrobianos beta-lactâmicos um dos grupos farmacológicos comumente associados a este desfecho adverso. A oxacilina, uma penicilina semissintética, possui um anel beta-lactâmico que confere atividade biológica e está associada com maior frequência a relatos de vasculite leucocitoclástica. No entanto, casos semelhantes relacionados a esse antimicrobiano são raros, sendo identificados apenas três casos na literatura. Diante desse contexto, relatamos um quarto caso de vasculite leucocitoclástica em um homem de 56 anos, em tratamento com oxacilina, que desenvolveu a vasculite no 3º dia de uso do antimicrobiano. Além da suspensão da oxacilina, ele foi tratado com 125 mg/dia de metilprednisolona endovenosa por sete dias, seguido de 20 mg/dia de prednisona oral por quatro dias, resultan-do em remissão satisfatória das lesões cutâneas e ausência de novos desfechos adversos. Este caso corrobora a possível relação causal entre o uso de oxacilina e o desenvolvimento da vasculite leucocitoclástica, apesar de sua ocorrência ser rara. A resposta favorável às intervenções terapêuticas, incluindo a suspensão da oxacilina e o uso de corticosteroides, destaca a eficácia dessas abordagens no tratamento dessa complicação (AU).

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis is a pathology whose mechanisms are associated with the process of vascular inflammation. It is estimated that up to 24% of the cases of vasculitis are drug-related, with beta-lactam antimicrobials be-ing one of the pharmacological groups commonly associated with this adverse outcome. Oxacillin, a semisynthetic penicillin, has a beta-lactam ring that confers biological activity and is most frequently associated with reports of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. However, similar cases related to this antimicrobial are rare, with only three cases identified in the literature. Against this background, we report a fourth case of leukocytoclastic vasculitis in a 56-year-old man, on oxacillin treatment, who developed the vasculitis on the 3rd day of antimicrobial use. In addition to oxacillin suspension, he was treated with 125 mg/day of intravenous methylprednisolone for seven days, followed by 20 mg/day of oral prednisone for four days, resulting in satisfactory remission of the skin lesions and no new adverse outcomes. This case provides further evidence supporting the potential causal relationship between the use of oxacillin and the development of leukocytoclastic vasculitis, albeit a rare occurrence. The positive response to therapeutic interventions, such as oxacillin suspension and corticosteroid treatment, underscores the effectiveness of these approaches in addressing this complication (AU),

Retrospective Evaluation of the Association of Oxacillin MIC on Acute Treatment Outcomes with Cefazolin and Antistaphylococcal Penicillins in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASP) and cefazolin are first-line treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. Borderline oxacillin resistance (i.e., oxacillin MICs 1-8 µg/mL) is observed in strains hyperproducing beta-lactamases. This mechanism is also behind the proposed inoculum effect. Minimal data exists on the comparative efficacy of cefazolin or ASP in qualitatively susceptible strains that demonstrate MICs of oxacillin of 1 to 2 µg/mL compared to strains with MIC of oxacillin < 1 µg/mL. We performed a retrospective cohort study of acute treatment outcomes in adult patients with community-acquired MSSA bacteremia treated with cefazolin or ASP, stratified by oxacillin MIC. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality during the index inpatient admission, failure to clear blood cultures within 72 h after initiating definitive therapy, and change in therapy due to perceived lack of efficacy. A total of 402 patients were included in this study, including 226 isolates with an oxacillin MIC ≥ 1 µg/mL and 176 isolates with an MIC < 1 µg/mL. There were no differences in the rate of the primary outcome occurrence between patients with an oxacillin MIC ≥ 1 µg/mL and an MIC < 1 µg/mL (16.4% versus 15.9%, P = 0.90). There was no difference in the primary outcome between high versus low oxacillin MIC groups among those who received ASP (22.9% versus 24.1%, P = 0.86) or cefazolin (10.3% versus 11.9%, P = 0.86). In our cohort of patients with MSSA bacteremia, oxacillin MIC (i.e., ≥ 1 versus < 1 µg/mL) was not associated with acute treatment outcomes, regardless of the beta-lactam selected as definitive therapy.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole induced aseptic meningitis case report.

RATIONALE: Drug-induced aseptic meningitis (DIAM) is an uncommon meningitis and trimethoprim with or without sulfamethoxazole is the most involved antibiotic. Although DIAM is easily treated with the discontinuation of the causative drug, the diagnosis is a big challenge for physicians, as it remains a diagnosis of exclusion. Here, we present a case report of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole induced aseptic meningitis in a woman with acute osteomyelitis. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 52-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for septic shock and acute osteomyelitis of the right homerus. She was started on antibiotic therapy with oxacillin and daptomycin, then oxacillin was replaced with cotrimoxazole, due to its excellent tissue penetration, including bone tissue. During cotrimoxazole therapy, the patient developed a fluent aphasia with ideomotor apraxia and muscle hypertonus. DIAGNOSIS AND INTERVENTIONS: Having excluded infectious, epileptic and vascular causes of the acute neurologic syndrome of our patient, given the improvement and full recovery after discontinuation of cotrimoxazole, we hypothesized a DIAM. OUTCOMES: After discontinuation of cotrimoxazole, in 48 hours the patient had a full recovery. LESSONS: Although DIAM can be easily managed with the withdrawal of the causative drug, it can be difficult to recognize if it is not included in the differential diagnosis. An antimicrobial stewardship program with a strict monitoring of patients by infectious disease specialists is essential, not only to optimize the appropriate use of antimicrobials, but also to improve patient outcomes and reduce the likelihood of adverse events.

Frequency of drug-induced liver injury in children receiving anti-staphylococcal penicillins.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-staphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) are among the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in children and are associated with a risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Despite the frequent use of ASPs in children, there is no consensus on whether liver function tests (LFTs) should be routinely monitored during treatment. OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on the frequency of ASP-related DILI in children to determine the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of hepatotoxicity. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase were searched in January 2022 for original studies of children who received cloxacillin, dicloxacillin, flucloxacillin, methicillin, nafcillin or oxacillin that included ≥10 children aged up to 18 years, and presented data on the incidence of DILI in children exposed to ASPs. RESULTS: Overall, two studies of oral flucloxacillin, two of intravenous (IV) methicillin, three of IV nafcillin and four of IV oxacillin were included. The mean onset of DILI ranged between 7.0 and 19.0 days following commencement of antibiotic treatment and all episodes resolved between 14.2 and 16.0 days after drug discontinuation, with no specific treatment required. This review found that the incidence of DILI in children was 1 in 50 000 for oral flucloxacillin and ranged from 1 in 3 to 13 for IV oxacillin, methicillin and nafcillin. CONCLUSIONS: This review found that routine LFT monitoring is not required in children receiving low dose oral flucloxacillin in a primary care setting, although pharmacovigilance is critical. For IV preparations, the existing data support routine LFT monitoring in those receiving treatment for at least 7 days.

DRESS syndrome in the setting of oxacillin therapy-a call for better patient preparedness: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome is a rare but severe and potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction, with significant morbidity and mortality. The clinical presentation of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms may include extensive skin rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, internal organ involvement, eosinophilia, and atypical lymphocytosis, most commonly due to drug-induced reaction. Our case is a rare occurrence of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome in the setting of oxacillin therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old Caucasian male presented to the emergency department on account of acute onset, 2-day history of generalized pruritic rash with associated fever, occurring 3 weeks after commencing therapy with intravenous oxacillin for methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. He had no known drug allergies. Two days prior to hospitalization, he had a telehealth visit with the infectious diseases specialist on account of his rash, and was recommended to use oral diphenhydramine. However, with the onset of fever and persistence of his rash, he was advised to discontinue the oxacillin and present to the emergency department. On examination, he was febrile at 101.2 °F and had a generalized blanchable maculopapular and morbilliform rash involving the face, trunk, upper and lower extremities, but sparing the palms, soles, and oral mucosa. He had palpable nontender lymph nodes in the cervical and inguinal regions bilaterally. Laboratory studies revealed atypical lymphocytosis, eosinophilia, neutrophilia, and elevated serum transaminases. He was started on intravenous diphenhydramine and admitted to the in-patient medical service. On the second day of hospitalization, his fever resolved. However, his rash was persistent and generalized, as well as elevated transaminases and an abnormal cell count on the second day of hospitalization. To complete his 6-week course of antibiotics for methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, he was switched to an alternative therapy with cefazolin, and he was scheduled for weekly follow-up assessments following hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers should increasingly be aware of the significant morbidity and mortality attributable to drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome and the potential medications which may incite such life-threatening reactions. Early recognition of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome and prompt institution of management strategies can promote improved clinical outcomes. Enhanced patient-provider communication strategies should be implemented to better prepare patients for the likelihood of such drug reactions, with the goal of improving patient-centered care and adherence with treatment strategies.

Disproportionality Analysis of Safety with Nafcillin and Oxacillin with the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Antistaphylococcal penicillins such as nafcillin and oxacillin are among the first choices of treatment for severe invasive methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections, although there has been limited safety evaluations between individual agents. Using the FDA Adverse Event Reports System (FAERS), oxacillin was observed to have a lower proportion of reports of acute renal failure (reporting odds ratio [ROR], 5.3 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.1 to 9.3] versus 21.3 [95% CI, 15.8 to 28.6], respectively) and hypokalemia (ROR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.1 to 4.8] versus 11.4 [95% CI, 7.1 to 18.3], respectively) than nafcillin.

Oxacillin-Induced Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS).

BACKGROUND Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is an idiosyncratic life-threatening reaction comprised of fevers, rash, and leukocytosis with eosinophilia. Though characteristically associated with leukocytosis, there are rare case reports of DRESS-induced agranulocytosis. DRESS is most frequently caused by antiepileptic medications; however, it has very rarely been reported in relation to oxacillin. We describe a case of oxacillin-induced DRESS associated with agranulocytosis. CASE REPORT A 52-year-old male was admitted for an epidural abscess secondary to oxacillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, for which an extended course of oxacillin and rifampin was initiated. On day 22 of therapy, the patient developed a fever of 38.7°C (101.6°F) with rigors. His complete blood cell count revealed new leukopenia (1.8×10³/uL) with 16% eosinophils and 3% atypical lymphocytes. Antibiotics were transitioned from oxacillin and rifampin to vancomycin, cefepime, and rifampin for presumed sepsis of unclear etiology. On day 23, he was noted to have a pruritic erythematous blanching papular rash on his chest, trunk, neck, and left upper extremity. Infectious workup was unrevealing, and his fever curve up-trended to 39.3°C (102.7°F) with no clinical improvement on broad-spectrum antimicrobials, suggestive of a non-infectious etiology of his rash and fevers. His rash evolved into confluent red patches, and eosinophilia rose to 21%, which was concerning for a drug reaction. His RegiSCAR score was calculated to be 6, consistent with definite DRESS. Leukopenia resolved (6.3×10³/uL) 4 days after discontinuing oxacillin. His epidural abscess was ultimately treated with daptomycin, and DRESS was managed supportively with antihistamines and triamcinolone cream. CONCLUSIONS We highlight this case because of the rarity of DRESS with agranulocytosis related to oxacillin. Beta-lactam antibiotics are widely used, and while DRESS is an uncommon condition, clinicians should consider this diagnosis when managing patients with fevers, leukopenia, and rash.

Adverse Events Lead to Drug Discontinuation More Commonly among Patients Who Receive Nafcillin than among Those Who Receive Oxacillin.

Nafcillin and oxacillin are used interchangeably in clinical practice, yet few studies have evaluated the safety of these two agents. Our objective was to compare the differential tolerabilities of nafcillin and oxacillin among hospitalized patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who received 12 g/day of nafcillin or oxacillin for at least 24 h. Two hundred twenty-four patients were included. Baseline characteristics and comorbidities were similar among patients receiving nafcillin (n = 160) and those receiving oxacillin (n = 64). Hypokalemia, defined as a potassium level of ≤3.3 mmol/liter or ≤2.9 mmol/liter or as a ≥0.5-mmol/liter decrease from the baseline level, occurred more frequently among patients who received nafcillin (51%, 20%, and 56%, respectively) than among those who received oxacillin (17%, 3%, and 34%, respectively; P < 0.0001, P = 0.0008, and P = 0.005, respectively). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, receipt of nafcillin was an independent predictor of severe hypokalemia (odds ratio [OR] = 6.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46 to 31.2; P = 0.02). Rates of hepatotoxicity did not differ between groups; however, acute kidney injury occurred more commonly with nafcillin than with oxacillin (18% versus 6%; P = 0.03). Overall, 18% of patients who received nafcillin discontinued therapy prematurely due to adverse events, compared to 2% of patients who received oxacillin (P = 0.0004). Nafcillin treatment is associated with higher rates of adverse events and treatment discontinuation than oxacillin among hospitalized adult patients. These findings have important implications for patients in both inpatient and outpatient settings, particularly patients who require long-term therapy and cannot be monitored routinely. Future randomized controlled studies evaluating the efficacy, costs, and tolerability of nafcillin versus oxacillin are warranted.

Determinación de staphylococcus aureus meticilino resistente de la comunidad (Sarm-com) en dos hospitales de Guatemala / Determination of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus community (Sarm-com) in two hospitals in Guatemala

El objetivo de este trabajo fue determinar cepas de Stapylococcus aureus meticilino resistente de la comunidad (SARM-com) en aislamientos provenientes de infecciones de la piel de pacientes del Hospital Roosevelt y hospital nacional Pedro de Betancourt de Guatemala. Para ello se realizó un estudio exploratorio de tipo descriptivo el cual consistió en un muestreo de 12 semanas en el laboratorio de microbiología del hospital Roosevelt y del hospital nacional Pedro de Betancourt. Se recolectaron las cepas que cumplieron con los siguientes criterios: haber sido identificadas como S. aureus, que presentaran resistencia a todos los betalactámicos, por medio de la resistencia a oxacilina y como resistencia variable a macrólidos y lincosamidas...

Reversible oxacillin-associated hepatitis in a 9-month-old boy.

Herein we present a case of a 9-month-old boy admitted to our hospital for acute femoral osteomyelitis and hip septic arthritis treatment. Acute hepatitis with concomitant skin rash developed on the sixth day of intravenous oxacillin therapy. No other known virus- or drug-related skin eruption or hepatitis was suspected. The boy recovered completely after antibiotics were shifted to teicoplanin, and no sequelae were noted. To our knowledge, this boy is the youngest case of reported oxacillin-related hepatitis in the literatures.

Adverse reactions to oxacillin in hospitalized children: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES: follow-up of children exposed to oxacillin during hospitalization focusing on adverse reactions. METHODS: patients were selected from the pediatric wards of two hospitals in Fortaleza (Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio-HUWC and Hospital Infantil Albert Sabin-HIAS) from the first oxacillin prescription with a prospective cohort study between October /2000 and July/ 2001 (HUWC) and July/2001 and March/ 2002 (HIAS). Patients' follow-up was performed by daily visits to the wards and medical charts and prescription analysis. Suspected oxacillin-induced adverse reactions (OxAR cases) were notified and classified according to causality and severity. Related statistic tests were completed. RESULTS: of the 130 patients exposed to oxacillin, 27 had OxAR (20.8 percent). Fever was the most frequent reaction (50 percent) followed by rash (35.7 percent). The majority of reactions were considered Probable, for oxacillin was the only medication involved and 92.6 percent of the cases had Moderate severity with the need of therapeutic interventions caused by OxAR. A significant relation between oxacillin exposure time and OxAR was determined as well as hospitalization time and the appearance of adverse reactions. Exposure time over 14 days to oxacillin was established as a risk factor for OxAR (relative risk = 5.49). CONCLUSIONS: careful administration of oxacillin in children is recommended with established treatment duration. Empiric and prolonged use must be avoided.

OBJETIVOS: acompanhar crianças expostas à oxacilina durante hospitalização, com foco na incidência de reações adversas. MÉTODOS: os pacientes foram selecionados em enfermarias pediátricas de dois hospitais de Fortaleza (Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio-HUWC e Hospital Infantil Albert Sabin-HIAS), desde a primeira prescrição de oxacilina, sendo feita coorte prospectiva entre outubro/2000 e julho/2001 (HUWC), e entre julho/2001 e março/2002 (HIAS). O seguimento de pacientes deu-se através de visitas diárias às enfermarias e análise de prontuários e prescrições. Os casos de RAOx foram notificados e classificados quanto à causalidade e gravidade, sendo realizados testes estatísticos pertinentes. RESULTADOS: dos 130 pacientes expostos à oxacilina, 27 apresentaram RAOx (20,8 por cento), sendo febre a reação mais freqüente (50 por cento), seguida do rash cutâneo (35,7 por cento). A maioria das reações foi considerada Provável, pois a oxacilina foi o único medicamento envolvido e 92,6 por cento dos casos tiveram gravidade Moderada, sendo necessárias intervenções terapêuticas devido à RAOx. Uma associação significante entre tempo de exposição à oxacilina e aparecimento de RAOx, assim como entre tempo de internamento e ocorrência de reação foi observada. Um tempo de exposição maior que 14 dias apresentou-se como fator de risco para ocorrência de RAOx (risco relativo = 5,49). CONCLUSÕES: recomenda-se administração cautelosa de oxacilina em crianças, com duração do tratamento estabelecida, evitando-se tratamento empírico e uso prolongado.

Severe hepatitis associated with oxacillin therapy.

A 6-year-old girl had fever, abdominal pain, and severe anicteric hepatitis during intravenous oxacillin therapy for staphylococcal osteomyelitis. She had greatly elevated liver enzymes, prolonged prothrombin time, leukopenia, and eosinophilia. Clinical symptoms resolved and laboratory data returned to normal after withdrawing oxacillin and substituting cefazolin. This hepatotoxicity appears to be specific to oxacillin and not to other beta-lactams. Monitoring liver function tests during oxacillin therapy, especially in patients receiving prolonged treatment, may be warranted.

Higher occurrence of hepatotoxicity and rash in patients treated with oxacillin, compared with those treated with nafcillin and other commonly used antimicrobials.

This study compared adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to oxacillin with those to nafcillin and other antibiotics. We reviewed the medical records of 222 children receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) from February 1995 through June 1999. The diagnosis, antibiotics used, ADRs, action taken, and patient demographics were recorded. The most common ADRs were neutropenia (9.8%), rash (8.5%), and hepatotoxicity (3.8%). ADRs occurred more frequently in the oxacillin group (58.5%) than in the nafcillin group (29.3%; P=.004), the clindamycin group (12.5%; P<.001) and the "other" antibiotics group (14.4%; P<.001). Hepatotoxicity and rash occurred more frequently in the oxacillin group (22% and 31.7%, respectively) than in the nafcillin group (0% [P<.001] and 10.3% [P=.008]), the clindamycin group (1.4% [P<.001] and 8.3% [P=.001]), and the other antibiotics group (1.4% [P<.001] and 1.4% [P<.001]). On the basis of this retrospective analysis, oxacillin use in children was associated with a higher incidence of hepatotoxicity and rash, compared with the use of nafcillin and other intravenous antimicrobials.

Cutaneous leucocytoclastic vasculitis associated with oxacillin.

A 67-year-old man who was treated with oxacillin for one week because of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, developed renal failure and diffuse, symmetric, palpable purpuric lesions on his feet. Necrotic blisters were noted on his fingers. Skin biopsies showed findings diagnostic of leucocytoclastic vasculitis. Oxacillin was discontinued and patient was treated with corticosteroids. The rash disappeared after three weeks and renal function returned to normal. Leucocytoclastic vasculitis presents as palpable purpura of the lower extremities often accompanied by abdominal pain, arthralgia, and renal involvement. Etiologic factors or associated disorders include infections, medications, collagen vascular disease and neoplasia. However, in half of the cases no etiologic factor is identified. Usually it is a self-limited disorder, but corticosteroid therapy may be needed in life-threatening cases since early treatment with corticosteroids in severe cases can prevent complications. Oxacillin should be included among the drugs that can cause leucocytoclastic vasculitis.

Randomized comparison of linezolid (PNU-100766) versus oxacillin-dicloxacillin for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of linezolid, an oxazolidinone, with those of oxacillin-dicloxacillin in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections. A total of 826 hospitalized adult patients were randomized to receive linezolid (600 mg intravenously [i.v.]) every 12 h or oxacillin (2 g i.v.) every 6 h; following sufficient clinical improvement, patients were switched to the respective oral agents (linezolid [600 mg orally] every 12 h or dicloxacillin [500 mg orally] every 6 hours). Primary efficacy variables were clinical cure rates in both the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and clinically evaluable (CE) patients and microbiological success rate in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients. Safety and tolerability were evaluated in the ITT population. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups in the 819 ITT patients. In the ITT population, the clinical cure rates were 69.8 and 64.9% in the linezolid and oxacillin-dicloxacillin groups, respectively (P = 0.141; 95% confidence interval -1.58 to 11. 25). In 298 CE linezolid-treated patients, the clinical cure rate was 88.6%, compared with a cure rate of 85.8% in 302 CE patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. In 143 ME linezolid-treated patients, the microbiological success rate was 88.1%, compared with a success rate of 86.1% in 151 ME patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. Both agents were well tolerated; most adverse events were of mild-to-moderate intensity. No serious drug-related adverse events were reported in the linezolid group. These data support the use of linezolid for the treatment of adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections.