Diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies using an overnight-stored pancreatic juice cell block specimen.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreatic juice cytology is useful for diagnosing pancreatic duct strictures and cystic lesions. However, some cases cannot be diagnosed using cytology. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the overnight-stored pancreatic juice cell block (CB) method for diagnosing pancreatic disease. METHODS: This retrospective study included 32 patients who presented with pancreatic duct strictures or cystic lesions between 2018 and 2024. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CB method and single/multiple pancreatic juice cytology were compared to evaluate the utility of the CB. RESULT: An endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage tube was placed in the main pancreatic duct, and pancreatic juice was collected to create a CB specimen. The median amount of pancreatic juice collected was 180(30-200) mL, and the median number of cytological examinations was three(2-8). Of the 32 cases, 13 were malignant, and 19 were benign (non-malignant). The sensitivity was significantly higher for the CB method (62 %) than for single cytology(15 %, P = 0.0414), and there was no significant difference between CB and multiple cytology(54 %, P = 1.0). The specificity and accuracy were not significantly different between the CB method and single or multiple cytology. When multiple cytology and CB were combined, sensitivity improved to 77 %. The pathological findings of the CB specimens were similar to the surgical specimens, including immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSION: The overnight-stored pancreatic juice CB method was more effective than single cytology, with similar sensitivities to multiple cytology and can also be used for immunohistochemistry. The pancreatic juice CB method is useful for pancreatic juice assessment.

Pancreatic juice cytology for diagnosing invasive pancreatic carcinoma/high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia without visible tumors on endoscopic ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with a diameter ≤10 mm and high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-PanIN) require pre-operative diagnosis. Most cases present only indirect imaging findings without visible tumors on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Therefore, EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy is not applicable. An alternative diagnostic method is pancreatic juice cytology (PJC) via endoscopic naso-pancreatic drainage (ENPD-PJC), which is not the standard practice. This study aimed to investigate ENPD-PJC for diagnosing suspected PDAC/HG-PanIN cases without visible tumors on EUS. METHODS: Data of patients with suspected PDAC/HG-PanIN without visible tumors who underwent PJC were retrospectively evaluated. One PJC sample was collected during endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP-PJC), and 12 samples were collected during ENPD-PJC, 3-hourly for cytological analysis. ERP-PJC, ERP/ENPD-PJC, and ENPD-PJC positivity indicated cytologically positive samples. Patients with positive/negative PJC with follow-up for <4-years were excluded as undiagnosed cases. A non-malignant diagnosis was based on histopathological absence/stable imaging findings for ≥4-years. The primary endpoint was to demonstrate that ERP/ENPD-PJC has a higher diagnostic ability than ERP-PJC. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with histopathologically diagnosed PDAC/HG-PanIN and 31 with a non-malignant diagnosis were enrolled. ERP-PJC, ERP/ENPD-PJC, and ENPD-PJC showed sensitivities of 36.4 %, 86.4 %, and 77.3 %, specificities of 93.5 %, 87.1 %, and 93.5 %, and accuracies of 69.8 %, 86.7 %, and 86.7 %, respectively. ERP/ENPD-PJC and ENPD-PJC demonstrated superior sensitivity and accuracy compared to ERP-PJC. A greater occurrence of positive outcomes markedly distinguished true positives from false positives. CONCLUSIONS: ERP/ENPD-PJC and ENPD-PJC had higher diagnostic accuracies for PDAC/HG-PanIN without visible tumors on EUS. ENPD-PJC is recommended for the diagnosis of these lesions.

Surgical indication for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm without mural nodule ≥5 mm.

BACKGROUND: In intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, a mural nodule ≥5 mm is an important predictor of malignancy. Surgical indication is less clear in cases of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm without mural nodule ≥5 mm. This is a retrospective study evaluating predictors of high-grade dysplasia or invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm without mural nodule ≥5 mm. METHODS: Among consecutive patients who underwent surgery for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm between 1999 and 2018, 174 had intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with mural nodule ≥5 mm (mural nodule[+] ≥5 mm group). The remaining 155 patients had intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm but did not have mural nodule ≥5 mm: 24 patients with mural nodule <5 mm (mural nodule[+] <5 mm group) and 131 patients without mural nodule (mural nodule[-] group). We investigated predictors of high-grade dysplasia or invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in cases of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm without mural nodule ≥5 mm. RESULTS: The frequency of high-grade dysplasia invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm was significantly higher in the mural nodule(+) ≥5 mm group (87.4%) than in the mural nodule(+) <5 mm group (37.5%, P < .001) and mural nodule(-) group (45.0%, P < .001). However, frequency was not significantly different between mural nodule(+) <5 mm and mural nodule(-) groups (P = .494). Multivariate analysis showed three independent predictors of high-grade dysplasia invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm without mural nodule ≥5 mm: branch cyst ≥40 mm (P = .038, odds ratio 3.704; 95% confidence interval, 1.075-12.821), positive cytology of pancreatic juice (P = .039, odds ratio 16.792; 95% confidence interval, 1.152-244.744), and carcinoembryonic antigen in pancreatic juice ≥30 mg/mL (P < .001, odds ratio 14.925; 95% confidence interval, 4.525-50.0). CONCLUSION: For cases of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm without mural nodule ≥5 mm, large cysts, positive cytology of the pancreatic juice, and high levels of carcinoembryonic antigen in pancreatic juice may be useful to determine surgical indication, although further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Value of repeated cytology for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas with high risk potential of malignancy: Is it a promising method for monitoring a malignant transformation?

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of and indications for cytological reexamination to detect malignant changes in branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) have not been studied in detail. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and indications of cytological reexamination by using pancreatic juice (repeated cytology) for BD-IPMNs. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent repeated cytology after a diagnosis of benignancy by using initial cytology were recruited for this study. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients, excluding 7 patients with lack of surveillance period after the final cytology, were classified into Malignancy (n = 13) and Benignancy groups (n = 25) on the bases of the findings from resected specimens or changes in BD-IPMNs after repeated cytology. The sensitivity and specificity to detect malignant changes in BD-IPMNs by using repeated cytology were 62% and 100%, respectively. For the 12 patients with mural nodules (MNs) ≥ 5 mm (67% of them were malignant), the sensitivity was 50%, whereas, for the 26 patients without MNs ≥ 5 mm (19% of them were malignant), it was 80%. In addition, malignant changes in BD-IPMNs after initial cytology occurred in 62% of the patients with changes in the MNs and 27% of the patients with an increase in the cyst size. CONCLUSION: Repeated cytology can play a role in the determination for surgery even after a diagnosis of benignancy by using initial cytology, especially for BD-IPMNs without MNs ≥5 mm. In addition, changes in the MNs or cyst size may be appropriate indications for repeated cytology.

Decreased CT-number in the pancreatic parenchyma is a reliable imaging biomarker of the presence of malignancies in patients with high-risk intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.

BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a premalignant cystic neoplasm of the pancreas and is frequently detected in imaging investigations. A proportion of the patients with IPMN develop malignancies including high-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma. To predict the presence of malignancies in IPMN, constant imaging follow-up is usually required. Pancreatic steatosis (PS) has been recently identified as a facilitating factor for pancreatic cancer, and can be predicted through computed tomography (CT). We hypothesized that the CT-number of the pancreatic parenchyma could be a new reliable imaging biomarker for IPMN patients. METHODS: Eighty-six patients undergoing pancreatectomy for IPMN were investigated. Using preoperative CT, the pancreatic index (PI) was calculated by dividing the CT-number of the pancreas by that of the spleen. RESULTS: Malignancies were pathologically detected in 63 cases (73.3%). Patients were divided into two cohorts according to the presence of malignancies and were compared for various factors including the PI scores. The comparison of the two cohorts detected significant differences in two parameters (CA19-9 and PI score), and the PI score was the most sensitive biomarker to predict the presence of malignancies in patients showing high-risk stigmata of IPMN. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic CT-number is an additional reliable imaging biomarker in distinguishing patients with IPMN having malignancies when investigating the patients showing high-risk stigmata.

Carcinoma in situ of the pancreas with pancreatic duct stricture persistent for 4 years diagnosed by serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE).

Serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE) by nasopancreatic tube placement can give us an opportunity to diagnose early-stage pancreatic cancer with higher sensitivity and specificity compared with conventional pancreatic cytology by one-time pancreatic juice aspiration or pancreatic duct brushing. We performed SPACE in a patient with persistent pancreatic duct stricture (PDS) with gradually advancing pancreatic parenchyma atrophy (PPA) in the pancreas tail. The result of SPACE was suggestive of pancreatic carcinoma, and distal pancreatectomy was performed. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed carcinoma in situ of the pancreas. The present case could indicate that any PDS becomes a candidate for SPACE especially in a patient with PPA, although the PDS remains unchanged for a long period.

Evaluation of efficacy of pancreatic juice cytology for risk classification according to international consensus guidelines in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic juice cytology (PJC) for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a possible tool to enhance preoperative diagnostic ability by improving risk classification for malignant IPMN, but its efficacy is controversial. This study evaluated the efficacy of PJC for risk classification according to international guidelines. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 127 IPMN patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) preoperatively. PJC was performed in 125 of the 127 cases. High-risk stigmata (HRS, n = 57), worrisome features (WF, n = 64), and other characteristics (n = 6) were classified according to the 2017 international guidelines. RESULTS: Among the 127 IPMN patients, 71 (55.9%) had malignant IPMN (invasive and non-invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma). The accuracy of WF for classifying malignant IPMN was increased by the addition of PJC, but the accuracy of HRS was not (WF to WF + PJC: 33.1% [42/127] to 48.8% [61/125], HRS to HRS + PJC: 65.4% [83/127] to 52.8% [66/125]). Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) occurred in 32 (25.2%) of 127 IPMN patients. Severe PEP was not detected. Significant risk factors for PEP were female sex, obesity, and endoscopic naso-pancreatic drainage (ENPD) (P = .03, P = .0006, and P = .02, respectively). In patients with ENPD tube placement, a main pancreatic duct size of <5 mm was a significant risk factor for PEP (P = .02). CONCLUSION: PJC could increase the accuracy of WF for classifying malignant IPMN. The additive effect of PJC for risk classification may be limited, however, and it is not recommended for all IPMN cases due to the high frequency of PEP.

Cytologic Analysis of Pancreatic Juice Increases Specificity of Detection of Malignant IPMN-A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas can progress to cancer. Biomarkers have been identified that were reported to increase the accuracy of identification of malignant lesions; we performed a systematic review of the accuracy of these markers. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of published studies on biomarkers of malignant IPMNs by searching MEDLINE and Web of Science databases from January 2005 through December 2017. Our methods were developed based on the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves, and their respective areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated from groups of markers (cell-, protein-, or DNA-based) measured in samples collected before and after surgery. A hypothetical test model was developed to determine how to meaningfully amend the revised Fukuoka guidelines, focusing on increasing test specificity for patients with IPMNs that have worrisome features. RESULTS: We collected data from 193 published studies, comprising 12,297 patients, that analyzed 7 preoperative and 21 postoperative markers of IPMNs. The 3 biomarkers that identified malignant IPMNs with the largest AUC values were pancreatic juice cytology (AUC, 0.84; sensitivity, 0.54; specificity, 0.91), serum protein carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (AUC, 0.81; sensitivity, 0.45; specificity, 0.90), and cyst fluid cytology (AUC, 0.82; sensitivity, 0.57; specificity, 0.84). A combination of cytologic and immunohistochemical analysis of MUC1 and MUC2 in pancreatic juice samples identified malignant IPMNs with the largest AUC and sensitivity values (AUC, 0.85; sensitivity, 0.85; specificity, 0.65). In a test model, inclusion of cytologic analysis of pancreatic juice in the guideline algorithm significantly increased the specificity of detection of malignant IPMNs. CONCLUSIONS: In a systematic review, we found cytologic analysis of pancreatic juice to have the greatest effect in increasing the specificity of detection of malignant IPMNs. We propose addition of this test to the Fukuoka guidelines for assessment of patients with IPMNs with worrisome features.

The role of pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

Background and aim: pancreatic juice cytology (PJC) is an important predictor of malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). This study aimed to determine the role of PJC for the prediction of malignant IPMN (intraductal papillary mucinous cancer [IPMC]). Methods: medical records of IPMN patients who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2016 at the Nagasaki University Hospital were reviewed. Patients who underwent preoperative PJC were classified as high risk stigmata (HRS), worrisome features (WF) and no-criteria, based on imaging criteria. PJC class III or higher was considered as positive and only invasive IPMN was defined as IPMC. PJC was validated in each group with regard to sensitivity, specificity, accuracy with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) analysis. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: preoperative pancreatic juice was obtained in 33/52 IPMN patients; only patients with adequate aspirate for cytology (n = 29) were included. In the HRS group (n = 9), 4/6 non-IPMC had a negative PJC and 3/3 IPMC had a positive PJC. In the WF group (n = 17), 9/11 non-IPMC had a negative PJC and 3/6 IPMC had a positive PJC. Adding PJC to imaging results improved the AUROCs of HRS and WF from 0.63 and 0.62 to 0.83 and 0.66, respectively. PJC was negative in all no-criteria cases (n = 3; one IPMC and two non-IPMC). In all 29 patients, PJC sensitivity was 60% (95% CI: 26%-88%), specificity was 79% (95% CI: 54%-94%), accuracy was 72% (95% CI: 63%-89%) and the AUROC was 0.69 (p = 0.03). Conclusion: PJC is a statistically significant IPMC predictor that can improve the validity of imaging for IPMC prediction

No disponible

The role of pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: pancreatic juice cytology (PJC) is an important predictor of malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). This study aimed to determine the role of PJC for the prediction of malignant IPMN (intraductal papillary mucinous cancer [IPMC]). METHODS: medical records of IPMN patients who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2016 at the Nagasaki University Hospital were reviewed. Patients who underwent preoperative PJC were classified as high risk stigmata (HRS), worrisome features (WF) and no-criteria, based on imaging criteria. PJC class III or higher was considered as positive and only invasive IPMN was defined as IPMC. PJC was validated in each group with regard to sensitivity, specificity, accuracy with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) analysis. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: preoperative pancreatic juice was obtained in 33/52 IPMN patients; only patients with adequate aspirate for cytology (n = 29) were included. In the HRS group (n = 9), 4/6 non-IPMC had a negative PJC and 3/3 IPMC had a positive PJC. In the WF group (n = 17), 9/11 non-IPMC had a negative PJC and 3/6 IPMC had a positive PJC. Adding PJC to imaging results improved the AUROCs of HRS and WF from 0.63 and 0.62 to 0.83 and 0.66, respectively. PJC was negative in all no-criteria cases (n = 3; one IPMC and two non-IPMC). In all 29 patients, PJC sensitivity was 60% (95% CI: 26%-88%), specificity was 79% (95% CI: 54%-94%), accuracy was 72% (95% CI: 63%-89%) and the AUROC was 0.69 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: PJC is a statistically significant IPMC predictor that can improve the validity of imaging for IPMC prediction.

Efficacy and safety of pancreatic juice cytology by using synthetic secretin in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is difficult to detect in its early stages with the poorest prognosis of all cancers. To improve the prognosis, a precise diagnosis is needed when we suspect PDAC. Although endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) is a widely accepted modality for the diagnosis of PDAC, its sensitivity is 85-89%, and approximately 10% of PDAC cases cannot be diagnosed. The main causes that interrupt the diagnosis of PDAC by using EUS-FNA are tumor size, presence of a vessel or the main pancreatic duct along the puncture route, and difficulty in withdrawing anticoagulant. Pancreatic juice cytology (PJC), the sensitivity of which is 33.3-65.8%, is a method for the diagnosis of PDAC cases in which carrying out of EUS-FNA is difficult. To diagnose PDAC appropriately, we need to improve the diagnostic ability of PJC. METHODS: We examined PJC using synthetic secretin for 138 cases of pancreatic tumor and pancreatic non-cancerous diseases. RESULTS: Sensitivity of PJC improved from 50.9% to 74.0% as a result of synthetic secretin loading, and 13 PDAC cases that had not been able to be diagnosed with EUS-FNA could be diagnosed pathologically by PJC. Although there were 12 patients with mild pancreatitis (8.7%) as a complication, all were relieved with conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: Adding synthetic secretin to PJC is useful for cases in which it is difficult to carry out EUS-FNA for PDAC.

A Case of Pancreatic Carcinoma in situ Diagnosed by Repeated Pancreatic Juice Cytology.

Repeated pancreatic juice cytology via endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage (ENPD) has a high diagnostic yield and might be useful for the diagnosis of early-stage pancreatic cancer. A 67-year-old man presented with a pancreatic cyst occasionally detectable in the body of the pancreas by ultrasonography (US). No obvious pancreatic tumor was detected by US, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) (although the latter did reveal a weak, low echoic area). Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography showed irregular narrowing of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) at the pancreatic body. Pancreatic juice cytology was also performed, but did not give evidence of a malignancy. Therefore, the patient was followed up. CT and EUS performed after 3 months showed the same findings as did endoscopic retrograde pancreatography; however, the results of repeated pancreatic juice cytology performed via ENPD tube revealed a suspected malignancy on 2 of 6 occasions. Therefore, we performed a central pancreatectomy. Histopathological examination of a resected specimen revealed carcinoma in situ in the narrow MPD at the body of the pancreas. In the current case, repeated pancreatic juice cytology via ENPD was effective. A weak low echoic area around the MPD stricture on EUS might be related to the inflammatory change accompanying carcinoma in situ of the pancreas.

Acute pancreatitis-onset carcinoma in situ of the pancreas with focal fat replacement diagnosed using serial pancreatic-juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE).

A 59-year-old woman was admitted for acute pancreatitis. Abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a swollen pancreatic parenchyma with dilatation of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) of the pancreas tail, which was separated from the normal pancreas body side by a locally atrophic part of the pancreas. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography showed MPD stricture in the pancreas tail with dilatation of the upstream MPD. Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed that the MPD stricture of the pancreas tail was surrounded by a blurred and hypoechoic area. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed for serial pancreatic-juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE). The result indicated adenocarcinoma. Distal pancreatectomy was performed, and the histopathological examination showed high-grade PanIN (carcinoma in situ of the pancreatic duct) of the pancreas tail with atrophy and fibrosis of the pancreatic parenchyma, and local fat replacement adjacent to the lesion. The final histopathological diagnosis was carcinoma in situ of the pancreatic duct of the pancreas tail. Acute pancreatitis and local fatty change of the pancreatic parenchyma with MPD stricture are important clinical manifestations of pancreatic carcinoma in situ (PCIS) and performing SPACE in cases of MPD stricture without a recognizable mass is preferable for a diagnosis of PCIS.

Resection of carcinoma in situ and minimally invasive carcinoma of the pancreas in a patient presenting with stenosis and post-stenotic dilatation of the main pancreatic duct on endoscopic ultrasonography and positive serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytology.

We report a rare case of a 67-year-old man who underwent resection of carcinoma in situ and minimally invasive carcinoma of the pancreas. The patient presented with upper abdominal and back pain. No definite pancreatic mass was detected on abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). However, EUS and MRI demonstrated stenosis of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) in the body and post-stenotic dilatation, resulting in mild dilatation of MPD in the tail. Serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytology after endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage was suggestive of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Examination of the distal pancreatectomy specimen demonstrated carcinoma in situ in MPD and branches, with multiple intraepithelial neoplastic lesions in the background pancreas and an additional focus of minimally invasive carcinoma.

Pancreatic juice cytology with immunohistochemistry to detect malignancy and histologic subtypes in patients with branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to elucidate the efficacy of pancreatic juice cytology with the cell-block method (CB-PJC) for the determination of surgery in patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN). METHODS: In 138 patients with BD-IPMN from whom pancreatic juice was collected under ERCP for CB-PJC, we retrospectively evaluated the following: (1) the rate of successfully evaluated CB-PJC; (2) the ability of CB-PJC to diagnose malignancy and to identify pathologic subtypes in resected BD-IPMNs; (3) the rate of development into invasive cancer and progression of BD-IPMNs in patients with BD-IPMNs diagnosed as benignancy by CB-PJC; and (4) post-ERCP adverse events. RESULTS: (1) The success rate of CB-PJC was 89.9%. (2) The sensitivity and specificity of CB-PJC for preoperative diagnosis of malignancy were 50% and 100%, respectively, with only hematoxylin and eosin staining, whereas they were 79% and 100%, respectively, by adding immunohistologic staining. The agreement rate of the preoperative subtypes by CB-PJC with the subtypes of resected specimens was 93%. (3) The onset of invasive cancer was not detected at all on imaging studies, whereas the progression of IPMN was detected in 14 patients. Multivariate analysis revealed the risk factor of progression to be non-gastric type. The cumulative 5-year progression rate in this group was 89%. (4) Post-ERCP pancreatitis developed in 13 patients (7.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic efficacy of preoperative CB-PJC for malignant BD-IPMN was excellent. The results may suggest the feasibility of applying preoperative subtyping by CB-PJC for decisions as to whether surgery is indicated.

Molecular Detection of Gastrointestinal Neoplasia: Innovations in Early Detection and Screening.

Emerging molecular tools promise to extend the diagnostic reach of the endoscopist and open doors to population screening for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. This review briefly addresses biological considerations in marker detection and types of markers, highlights examples of tools under development at each organ site, and appraises the possibility of universal GI cancer screening. The outlook is positive, but further technical refinement and rigorous clinical validation are needed before most of these new approaches are ready for clinical application.

The safety and benefit of pancreatic juice cytology under ERCP in IPMN patients.

BACKGROUND: International consensus guidelines 2012 for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN), defined two characteristics: high-risk stigmata (HRS) and worrisome features (WF). Patients with WF require detailed examination including cytology. However, routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for cytology is not recommended in the guidelines due to risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Our aim was to clarify what types of IPMN were susceptible for PEP and gain benefit of ERCP. PATIENTS/METHODS: We examined 138 consecutive IPMN patients who underwent ERCP in our hospital, retrospectively. Patients were classified into HRS, WF and the others (N) based on imaging findings before ERCP. We assessed pancreatic juice cytology, PEP frequency and rate of malignant IPMN at 12 months after ERCP. RESULTS: The rates of cytological malignancy were 0% (N), 4.8% (WF) and 19.5% (HRS). The PEP frequency was 14.5%, and these risk factors were branch duct (BD)-IPMN, body/tail cysts and brush cytology by multivariate logistic analysis. The rates of malignant IPMN were 0% (N), 16.4% (WF) and 48.8% (HRS). Furthermore, we examined patients with WF in detail. The PEP frequency/rate of malignancy were 3.6%/23.1% in patients with main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation (5-9 mm), and the sensitivity of cytology was 33.3%. On the other hand, the PEP frequency/rate of malignancy were 17.2%/0% in patients with BD-IPMN fulfilling only cyst size over 30 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Routine ERCP for IPMN, especially for BD-IPMN, is not recommended. ERCP may be beneficial for WF patients with MPD dilatation based on a balance between PEP risk and presence of malignancy.

Pancreatic juice cytology as sensitive test for detecting pancreatic malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas without mural nodule.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies reported that mural nodule (MN) was the most associated with malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). However, IPMNs without MN cannot be diagnosed as malignant if only MN is determined to be indicator of malignancy. This study aimed to investigate role of pancreatic juice cytology for IPMNs without MN. METHODS: Medical records of 50 patients with histologically proven malignant IPMNs were reviewed. Exclusively for non-invasive cancer, extent of high-grade dysplasia along the main pancreatic duct (MPD) was determined microscopically. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent IPMNs had no MN. Cyst and main MPD diameter were significantly smaller in IPMN without MN compared to those in IPMN with MN (23 ± 14.1 vs 35 ± 13.2 mm, p = 0.010; 6.6 ± 4.3 vs 10.9 ± 6.1 mm, p = 0.006). Sensitivity of pancreatic juice cytology was higher in IPMN without MN compared to that in IPMN with MN (94% vs 53%, p = 0.004) although it could be affected by selection bias of study patients. Absence of MN was determined to be an independent factor associated with true positive cytology (OR = 24.3, p = 0.005). Extent of high-grade dysplasia was significantly longer in IPMN with true positive cytology compared to that in IPMN with false negative cytology (46.8 ± 20.5 vs 26.4 ± 11.0 mm, p = 0.005), and tended to be longer in IPMN without MN compared to that in IPMN with MN (47.0 ± 19.0 vs 36.0 ± 20.1 mm, p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity of pancreatic juice cytology was excellent in IPMN without MN. Pancreatic juice cytology may be a sensitive test for detection of pancreatic malignancy in IPMN without MN compared to high-risk imaging features.

Pancreatic adenocarcinomas without secondary signs on multiphasic multidetector CT: association with clinical and histopathologic features.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical, histopathologic and imaging features of pancreatic adenocarcinomas without secondary signs on dynamic CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients (mean age 70 years) with histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent preoperative contrast material-enhanced multiphasic multidetector CT before pancreatic resection. In each patient, clinical data including carbohydrate antigen 19-9, frequency of isoattenuating tumours, and presence of secondary signs and histopathologic findings such as tumour location, tumour stage, and microscopic infiltrative growth grade were evaluated. RESULTS: Ten tumours (14%) were without secondary signs, and 60 (86%) were with secondary signs. Tumours without and with secondary signs were located in the uncinate process in 5 (50%) and 3 (5%), head in 3 (30%) and 29 (48%), body in 2 (20%) and 22 (37%), and tail in 0 (0%) and 6 (10%), respectively (p = .001). The frequency of isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinomas without secondary signs was significantly higher than those with secondary signs (p = 0.034). The tumour stage of pancreatic adenocarcinomas without secondary signs was earlier than that in tumours with secondary signs (p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic adenocarcinomas without secondary signs is characterized by the presence of uncinate and isoattenuating tumours and earlier tumour stage compared to tumours with secondary signs. KEY POINTS: Frequency of pancreatic adenocarcinomas without secondary signs on multiphasic CT is 14 . Pancreatic adenocarcinomas without secondary signs are common in the uncinate process. Pancreatic adenocarcinomas without secondary signs are common in isoattenuating tumours. Pancreatic adenocarcinomas without secondary signs are characterized by earlier-stage tumours.

Efficacy of repeated cytology of pancreatic juice obtained by endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage tube for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a case series including a case of carcinoma in situ.

Repeated cytology of pancreatic juice obtained by endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage (ENPD) tube has been highlighted as an early diagnostic method for small pancreatic cancer, including carcinoma in situ. We report two cases of early-stage pancreatic cancer diagnosed using repeated cytology; both cases underwent curative resection. No significant masses were found on conventional imaging in either case, with only pancreatic duct strictures being observed. ENPD tubes were placed to collect pancreatic juice in both cases. In case 1, two of five pancreatic juice samples showed adenocarcinoma. Therefore, distal pancreatectomy was performed, and a PanIN3 grade neoplasm (carcinoma in situ) was identified at the branch duct near the distal stricture. In case 2, two of seven pancreatic juice samples (collected during the second tube placement) showed adenocarcinoma. Therefore, distal pancreatectomy was performed, and a PanIN3 neoplasm was identified primarily in the pancreatic duct at a narrow section with fibrosis. Partial microinvasion (<1 mm) was observed at the branch duct. Repeated cytology of pancreatic juice obtained by ENPD tube is effective for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, especially in cases without mass formation. However, some issues, including the appropriate number of samples, should be addressed in large prospective studies.