Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 60
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 9008, 2023 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37268660

ABSTRACT

Respiratory diseases caused by Mannheimia haemolytica (M. haemolytica) and Pasteurella multocida (P. multocida) have been known to result in a considerable loss due to mortality and reduced production. This study aimed at isolation and identification of M. haemolytica and P. multocida associated with pneumonic pasteurellosis in sheep and goats using bacteriological and molecular techniques. Identification of serotypes of M. haemolytica and P. multocida was done using indirect haemagglutination test. The in vitro antimicrobial sensitivity profiles of the M. haemolytica were tested using standard disk diffusion method. A total of 52 and 78 nasal swabs were collected from pneumonic cases for bacterial isolation and identification in Borana and Arsi zone, respectively. Four hundred sera samples were collected for identification of serotypes. The results showed that 17 of 52 (32.69%; 95% CI 20.33, 47.11) nasal swabs collected from pneumonic animals in Borana yielded positive results for Pasteurella/Mannheimia species, 13 (25.00%; 95% CI 14.03, 38.95) of which were M. haemolytica. None of the samples yielded P. multocida. Twenty-three of 78 (29.49%; 95% CI 19.69, 40.89) nasal swabs collected at Arsi from pneumonic animals yielded positive results for M. haemolytica (17) and P. multocida (6). Secondary biochemical characterization revealed that 14 of the 17 isolates conform to M. haemolytica whereas none of the 6 isolates suspected to be P. mutocida were confirmed. Eleven (84.62%) isolates from Borana and 4 (28.57%) from Arsi were confirmed to be M. haemolytica using PCR targeting the Rpt2 genes. Assay for M. haemolytica serotype A1 revealed all belong to A1. None of the isolates with cultural and morphological features of P. multocida gave positive results by molecular assay. Serological assay identified three serotypes of M. haemolytica namely A1, A2 and A7 almost in all of the samples whereas P. multocida serotype A was detected in 78.75% of the samples. The M. haemolytica isolates tested for susceptibility to antibiotics showed resistance against Bacitracin (83.33%) and Penicillin (50.00%) while they were found susceptible to Gentamycin (100%), Chloramphenicol (100%) and Sulfamethoxazole (100%) and Tetracycline (83.33%). In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed the association of M. haemolytica with pneumonic pasteurellosis in sheep and goats and can be of use in vaccine development in Ethiopia. Nevertheless, further investigations and continuous monitoring of antimicrobial resistance and appropriate selection and prudent use of antimicrobials in livestock sector are required.


Subject(s)
Mannheimia haemolytica , Pasteurella multocida , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic , Sheep Diseases , Cattle , Animals , Sheep , Pasteurella multocida/genetics , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/microbiology , Serogroup , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Goats , Pasteurella , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Sheep Diseases/drug therapy , Sheep Diseases/microbiology
2.
Vet Res ; 51(1): 36, 2020 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32138772

ABSTRACT

Mannheimia haemolytica serotype A2 is the principal cause of pneumonic mannheimiosis in ovine and caprine livestock; this disease is a consequence of immune suppression caused by stress and associated viruses and is responsible for significant economic losses in farm production worldwide. Gram-negative bacteria such as M. haemolytica produce outer membrane (OM)-derived spherical structures named outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) that contain leukotoxin and other biologically active virulence factors. In the present study, the relationship between M. haemolytica A2 and bovine lactoferrin (BLf) was studied. BLf is an 80 kDa glycoprotein that possesses bacteriostatic and bactericidal properties and is part of the mammalian innate immune system. Apo-BLf (iron-free) showed a bactericidal effect against M. haemolytica A2, with an observed minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 16 µM. Sublethal doses (2-8 µM) of apo-BLf increased the release of OMVs, which were quantified by flow cytometry. Apo-BLf modified the normal structure of the OM and OMVs, as observed through transmission electron microscopy. Apo-BLf also induced lipopolysaccharide (LPS) release from bacteria, disrupting OM permeability and functionality, as measured by silver staining and SDS and polymyxin B cell permeability assays. Western blot results showed that apo-BLf increased the secretion of leukotoxin in M. haemolytica A2 culture supernatants, possibly through its iron-chelating activity. In contrast, holo-BLf (with iron) did not have this effect, possibly due to differences in the tertiary structure between these proteins. In summary, apo-BLf affected the levels of several M. haemolytica virulence factors and could be evaluated for use in animals as an adjuvant in the treatment of ovine mannheimiosis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Exotoxins , Lactoferrin/pharmacology , Mannheimia haemolytica/drug effects , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Sheep Diseases/drug therapy , Animals , Mannheimia haemolytica/physiology , Sheep
3.
Vet Microbiol ; 235: 110-117, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31282368

ABSTRACT

Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) is a major threat to animal health and welfare in the cattle industry. Strains of Mannheimia haemolytica (Mh) that are resistant to multiple classes of antimicrobials are becoming a major concern in the beef industry, as the frequency of isolation of these strains has been increasing. Mobile genetic elements, such as integrative conjugative elements (ICE), are frequently implicated in this rapid increase in multi-drug resistance. The objectives of the current study were to determine the genetic relationship between the isolates collected at arrival before metaphylaxis and at revaccination after metaphylaxis, to identify which resistance genes might be present in these isolates, and to determine if they were carried on an ICE. Twenty calves culture positive for Mh at arrival and revaccination were identified, and a total of 48 isolates with unique susceptibility profiles (26 from arrival, and 22 from revaccination) were submitted for whole-genome sequencing (WGS). A phylogenetic tree was constructed, showing the arrival isolates falling into four clades, and all revaccination isolates within one clade. All revaccination isolates, and one arrival isolate, were positive for the presence of an ICE. Three different ICEs with resistance gene modules were identified. The resistance genes aphA1, strA, strB, sul2, floR, erm42, tetH/R, aadB, aadA25, blaOXA-2, msrE, mphE were all located within an ICE. The gene bla-ROB1 was also present in the isolates, but was not located within an ICE.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cattle/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Mannheimia haemolytica/drug effects , Mannheimia haemolytica/genetics , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/microbiology , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Genetic Variation , Genome, Bacterial , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Immunization, Secondary , Interspersed Repetitive Sequences , Mannheimia haemolytica/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Phylogeny , Vaccination , Whole Genome Sequencing
4.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 51(8): 2603-2610, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31230255

ABSTRACT

The study aimed to define the effects of M. haemolytica and a single oral dose of albendazole on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of marbofloxacin in lambs. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic integration of marbofloxacin was applied to describe a 3 mg/kg intramuscular dose in lambs. The 6 healthy and 12 naturally infected with M. haemolytica lambs (Akkaraman, males weighing 10-15 kg and aged 2-3 months) were used in this study. In the marbofloxacin group, 6 healthy lambs received marbofloxacin. In the albendazole group after 2 weeks washout period, the same animals received marbofloxacin on 1 h after albendazole. In the diseased marbofloxacin group, 6 lambs naturally infected with M. haemolytica received marbofloxacin. In the diseased albendazole group, 6 lambs naturally infected with M. haemolytica received marbofloxacin on 1 h after albendazole. The marbofloxacin and albendazole were administered each as a single dose of 3 mg/kg intramuscular and 7.5 mg/kg oral, respectively, in the respective groups. Plasma concentration of marbofloxacin was measured with HPLC-UV and pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by non-compartmental model. Albendazole did not change the pharmacokinetic profiles of marbofloxacin in healthy and diseased lambs. However, M. haemolytica affected the pharmacokinetics of marbofloxacin in diseased lambs, AUC0-24/MIC90 ratio was not found to be higher than 125, but Cmax/MIC90 ratios was found to be higher than 10 for an MIC value of 0.25 µg/mL in all groups. The marbofloxacin dose described in this study may not be effective for the treatment of infections due to M. haemolytica in lambs, with MIC ≤ 0.25 µg/mL.


Subject(s)
Albendazole/pharmacology , Anthelmintics/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacokinetics , Mannheimia haemolytica/physiology , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Sheep Diseases/drug therapy , Animals , Injections, Intramuscular/veterinary , Male , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/microbiology , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/microbiology , Turkey
5.
J Anim Sci ; 92(1): 311-9, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24243906

ABSTRACT

This clinical trial evaluated the impact of metaphylactic antimicrobial administration 10 d before experimental inoculation with Mannheimia haemolytica (MH) to mitigate pulmonary lesions. Thirty-three crossbreed heifers were procured as a single group and were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 blocks and to treatment, tildipirosin (ZUP; 4 mg/kg) or tulathromycin (DRX; 2.5 mg/kg) or saline (SAL; 1 mL/45.5 kg), within block on arrival at Kansas State University. All trial procedures were staggered by 7-d intervals for each block, resulting in all animals within a block receiving treatment, challenge, and necropsy on the same dates. Heifers within each block received an endoscopic MH challenge 10 d following treatment administration (d 0) and were housed in individual indoor stalls for 3 d postchallenge. Clinical illness scores (CIS), respiration quality scores, appetite scores, and injection site reactions were recorded on all animals from d 0 through d 13. Rectal temperatures were measured once daily on all animals from d 8 through d 13. Heifers were necropsied, and lung lesions were evaluated on d 13. Lung lesion data were evaluated using nonparametric methods (Kruskall-Wallis), and standard least squares models were used to evaluate the remaining variables. The pulmonary lesion scores (percentage of affected lung) ranged from 3.3% to 39.8% for all heifers with 92% (11/12) of ZUP-treated heifers having <10% lesions. Tildipirosin-treated heifers had lower (P < 0.05) lung lesion scores when compared with DRX- and SAL-treated heifers. Lung weight expressed as a percentage of BW was lower (P < 0.05) in ZUP heifers compared to DRX- and SAL-treated heifers. The probability of receiving abnormal CIS, appetite scores, and respiratory scores was lower (P < 0.05) in ZUP-treated heifers compared to DRX- and SAL-treated animals. This study showed that heifers treated with tildipirosin 10 d before MH challenge have less pulmonary damage and fewer clinical signs of illness compared to heifers treated with DRX or SAL.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Lung/drug effects , Mannheimia haemolytica/immunology , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Tylosin/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/veterinary , Cattle , Female , Lung/pathology , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/immunology , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/microbiology , Tylosin/therapeutic use
6.
Am J Vet Res ; 72(12): 1613-21, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22126689

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the impact of Mannheimia haemolytica infection on feed intake and weight gain in feedlot heifers and to evaluate the clinical efficacy of isoflupredone acetate administered in combination with oxytetracycline. ANIMALS: 96 weanling heifers in a research feedlot facility. PROCEDURES: Bronchopneumonia was induced by intrabronchial infusion of M haemolytica. Control heifers underwent a sham procedure. Infected heifers were treated with oxytetracycline alone or in combination with isoflupredone acetate (OXY-ISO) or with nothing. Clinical variables were recorded daily for 7 days following disease induction, and feedlot performance indices were measured over a 12-week period. RESULTS: Infection caused a reduction in dry-matter intake and average daily gain (ADG) in heifers that received no treatment. Oxytetracycline treatment alone did not prevent reductions in feed intake and ADG during the first week after infection was induced, whereas OXY-ISO treatment did prevent these reductions. Treatment with OXY-ISO also resulted in faster clinical improvement. No significant differences were evident between the oxytetracycline and OXY-ISO groups with respect to dry-matter intake or ADG throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Isoflupredone acetate appeared to be a useful clinical adjunct to treatment with oxytetracycline in cattle with acute M haemolytica bronchopneumonia.


Subject(s)
Bronchopneumonia/veterinary , Fluprednisolone/analogs & derivatives , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Mannheimia haemolytica/drug effects , Oxytetracycline/therapeutic use , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Bronchopneumonia/microbiology , Cattle , Dairying , Drug Therapy, Combination/veterinary , Feeding Behavior , Female , Fluprednisolone/therapeutic use , Hydrocortisone/blood , Ontario , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/microbiology , Random Allocation , Weight Gain
7.
Vet Microbiol ; 139(1-2): 74-9, 2009 Oct 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19428195

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular characterization of quinolone-resistant Mannheimia haemolytica was conducted. The antimicrobial susceptibility of 229 M. haemolytica isolates which were obtained from cattle with bovine respiratory disease during the period 1984-2006, was determined using 14 antimicrobial agents. Of the 229 isolates, 114 (49.8%) were resistant to at least one agent and resistance rates ranged from 4.8% to 31.4%. Resistance rates for dihydrostreptomycin, oxytetracycline, doxycycline, ampicillin, amoxicillin, thiamphenicol, kanamycin chloramphenicol, nalidixic acid, enrofloxacin, and danofloxacin were 31.4%, 20.5%, 18.3%, 19.2%, 16.6%, 10.9%, 11.4%, 10.5%, 17.0%, 4.8% and 4.8%, respectively. The nucleotide sequences of the quinolone resistance-determining regions of the gyrA and parC genes of nalidixic acid-resistant M. haemolytica were determined. All nalidixic acid-resistant strains possessed at least one amino acid substitution in each of the GyrA and ParC fragments investigated. These results suggest that M. haemolytica require at least one amino acid substitution in both GyrA and ParC in order to attain significant levels of resistance to quinolones. All fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates belonged to serotype 6, and their genotype by PFGE analysis was identical. This result indicates that fluoroquinolone-resistant M. haemolytica strains have clonally expanded.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Mannheimia haemolytica/drug effects , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cattle/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial/veterinary , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Mannheimia haemolytica/classification , Mannheimia haemolytica/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Molecular Sequence Data , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/microbiology , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Serotyping/veterinary
9.
Can Vet J ; 48(6): 600-6, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17616056

ABSTRACT

A field trial was performed under commercial feedlot conditions in central Nebraska to assess the relative efficacy of tulathromycin (TULA) to florfenicol (FLOR) for the treatment of undifferentiated fever (UF) in feedlot calves that did not receive a metaphylactic antimicrobial or vaccines/bacterins containing Mannheimia haemolytica or Histophilus somni at feedlot arrival by comparing animal health, feedlot performance, and carcass characteristic variables. Two hundred recently weaned, auction market derived, crossbred beef calves that met the study-specific case definition of UF were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of 2 experimental groups as follows: TULA, which received tulathromycin administered subcutaneously at the rate of 2.5 mg/kg body weight (BW) once at the time of allocation; or FLOR, which received florfenicol administered subcutaneously at the rate of 40 mg/kg BW once at the time of allocation. In terms of animal health, the first UF relapse (RR = 0.65), overall mortality (RR = 0.33), and BRD mortality (RR = 0.29) rates in the TULA group were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than in the FLOR group. There were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences between the TULA and FLOR groups for the other animal health variables measured. There was no significant (P > or = 0.05) difference in average daily gain between the TULA and FLOR groups. There were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences in the overall distributions of quality grade and yield grade between the experimental groups; however, a significantly (P < 0.05) higher proportion of carcasses in the TULA group graded yield grade USDA-4 as compared with the FLOR group. In the economic analysis, the benefits observed resulted in an economic advantage of $52.50 USD/animal in the TULA group due to lower first UF relapse and overall mortality rates, even though the occurrence of yield grade USDA-4 carcasses increased and the initial UF treatment cost was higher.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Animals , Cattle , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Nebraska , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/mortality , Recurrence , Thiamphenicol/analogs & derivatives , Thiamphenicol/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Weight Gain
10.
J Vet Pharmacol Ther ; 30(3): 234-41, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17472655

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of tulathromycin at resolving bovine respiratory disease in North American feedlot cattle. This study was a systematic review of published literature. A search was conducted to identify all manuscripts relating to antibiotic treatment of cattle with respiratory disease. Relevant studies reported treatment with tulathromycin of naturally occurring respiratory disease in beef cattle in North America. Studies which failed to use randomization to minimize bias were excluded from the review. The relative risk of retreatment for bovine respiratory disease was calculated for each study included in the final review. Initially, 782 potential manuscripts were identified. After relevance screening and quality assessment, 21 high quality manuscripts were available for analysis. Two peer reviewed publications and two technical reports describing 14 trials compared tulathramycin with tilmicosin or florfenicol. In the meta-analysis of studies comparing tilmicosin with tulathromycin, the summary Mantel-Haenszel relative risk was 0.51 (95% confidence interval 0.45-0.57). It was not possible to calculate a summary Mantel-Haenszel relative risk comparing florfenicol with tulathromycin as the only three studies reported this comparison. When using a meta-analysis to combined data from randomized clinical trials reporting treatment with tulathromycin or either florfenicol or tilmicosin, tulathromycin was associated with an approximately 50% reduction in the risk of re-treatment for bovine respiratory disease compared with treatment with tilmicosin.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/pathology , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Heterocyclic Compounds/administration & dosage , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/pathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
12.
Rev Sci Tech ; 25(3): 1153-63, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17361779

ABSTRACT

In April 2002, an investigation into an outbreak of acute respiratory disease in goats and sheep in Milae (Afar), Ethiopia was conducted. The investigation involved 4 flocks (722 sheep and 750 goats in total) and comprised the disease history, clinical and post-mortem examination, and microbiological analysis of nasal swabs, lung lesions, and pleural fluid samples. Clinically diseased animals exhibited severe respiratory distress, and necropsy of two of the goats demonstrated fibrinous pneumonia, lung sequestra, and excessive accumulation of straw coloured fluid in the thoracic cavity. Mannheimia haemolytica biotype T was isolated from nine (six goats and three sheep) out of 23 nasal swabs (39.1%). In the two necropsied animals Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae (Mccp) was isolated from the lungs, and Mannheimia haemolytica biotype T was isolated from lung lesions and thoracic fluid. An unidentified Mycoplasma species was isolated from the thoracic fluid of one of the goats. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated from a lung sequestrum of one of the necropsied goats. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test results indicated that two (33.3%) of the six M. haemolytica isolates that were tested were resistant to ampicillin and penicillin G, three (50%) to tetracycline, four (66.7%) to oxacillin, five (83.3%) to erythromycin, and six (100%) to clindamycin. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was resistant to all of the different classes of antimicrobials that were tested. Pleuropneumonia caused by Mccp, and secondary complications caused by M. haemolytica and the other unidentified Mycoplasma species, were confirmed as the cause of the outbreak. Morbidity was not associated with the species of animals affected (P > 0.05); however, mortality was significantly higher in goats than sheep (P < 0.05).


Subject(s)
Goat Diseases/epidemiology , Mannheimia haemolytica/isolation & purification , Mycoplasma mycoides/isolation & purification , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/epidemiology , Pleuropneumonia, Contagious/epidemiology , Sheep Diseases/epidemiology , Acute Disease , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Female , Goat Diseases/drug therapy , Goats , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Pleuropneumonia, Contagious/drug therapy , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/drug therapy
13.
Vet Ther ; 6(2): 83-95, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16094557

ABSTRACT

Tulathromycin is a novel triamilide antimicrobial that has been approved for use in the treatment and prevention of bovine respiratory disease and the treatment of swine respiratory disease in the European Union and the United States. The agent penetrates gram-negative bacteria well, and it exhibits mixed bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity. Tulathromycin is formulated as a ready-to-use, sterile aqueous solution, and the packaged concentration of 100 mg tulathromycin/ml allows low-volume dosing. This agent is characterized by rapid absorption from the injection site, extensive distribution to tissue, and slow elimination, thereby providing high, prolonged drug concentration in the lungs. Studies show that a single dose of tulathromycin is effective in treating cattle and swine with respiratory disease and in preventing high-risk cattle from developing respiratory disease.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Disaccharides/pharmacokinetics , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Area Under Curve , Cattle/metabolism , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Disaccharides/pharmacology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Heterocyclic Compounds/administration & dosage , Heterocyclic Compounds/pharmacology , Lung/metabolism , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/microbiology , Swine/metabolism
14.
Vet Ther ; 6(2): 113-21, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16094559

ABSTRACT

The in vitro activity of tulathromycin was evaluated against common bovine and porcine respiratory pathogens collected from outbreaks of clinical disease across eight European countries from 1998 to 2001. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for one isolate of each bacterial species from each outbreak were determined using a broth microdilution technique. The lowest concentrations inhibiting the growth of 90% of isolates (MIC90) for tulathromycin were 2 microg/ml for Mannheimia (Pasteurella) haemolytica, 1 microg/ml for Pasteurella multocida (bovine), and 2 microg/ml for Pasteurella multocida (porcine) and ranged from 0.5 to 4 microg/ml for Histophilus somni (Haemophilus somnus) and from 4 to 16 microg/ml for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Isolates were retested in the presence of serum. The activity of tulathromycin against fastidious organisms was affected by culture conditions, and MICs were reduced in the presence of serum.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Disaccharides/pharmacology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Heterocyclic Compounds/pharmacology , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae/drug effects , Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae/isolation & purification , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cattle , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Europe/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Haemophilus somnus/drug effects , Haemophilus somnus/isolation & purification , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , In Vitro Techniques , Mannheimia haemolytica/drug effects , Mannheimia haemolytica/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Pasteurella multocida/drug effects , Pasteurella multocida/isolation & purification , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/blood , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/microbiology , Swine , Swine Diseases/blood , Swine Diseases/drug therapy , Swine Diseases/microbiology
15.
Vet Ther ; 6(2): 122-35, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16094560

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of tulathromycin in the treatment (phase 1) and prevention (phase 2) of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) was evaluated on commercial farms in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. In phase 1, commingled cattle with clinical BRD were treated with tulathromycin (n = 128) or florfenicol (n = 125) on day 0. Similar percentages of animals showed sustained clinical improvement at day 14 (tulathromycin 83.3% versus florfenicol 81.0%) and had not relapsed by day 60 (tulathromycin 63.3% versus florfenicol 58.4%). In phase 2, healthy in-contact cattle were treated with tulathromycin (n = 492), tilmicosin (n = 494), or saline (n = 265) on day 0. Significantly more (P = .0001) tulathromycin-treated cattle remained healthy to day 14 (92.4%) than tilmicosin-treated (83.7%) or saline-treated (63.7%) cattle, and this was maintained through day 60 (tulathromycin 85.4% versus tilmicosin 75.1% and saline 56.2%). Tulathromycin was highly effective in the treatment and prevention of BRD.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/epidemiology , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/prevention & control , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cattle , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Europe/epidemiology , Haemophilus somnus/isolation & purification , Heterocyclic Compounds/administration & dosage , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Mannheimia haemolytica/isolation & purification , Mycoplasma bovis/isolation & purification , Pasteurella multocida/isolation & purification , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/microbiology , Thiamphenicol/administration & dosage , Thiamphenicol/analogs & derivatives , Thiamphenicol/therapeutic use , Tylosin/administration & dosage , Tylosin/analogs & derivatives , Tylosin/therapeutic use
16.
Vet Ther ; 6(2): 143-53, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16094562

ABSTRACT

Efficacy and field safety of tulathromycin administered as a single-dose treatment to crossbreed beef calves with undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease (BRD) were evaluated in a multicenter field study conducted at four US feedlots. Two hundred castrated male calves were enrolled at each study site. The treatment groups were physiologic saline (n = 160) given SC at 0.02 ml/kg, tulathromycin (n = 320) given SC at 2.5 mg/kg, and tilmicosin (n = 320) given SC at 10 mg/kg. Nasopharyngeal swabs for bacterial culture were obtained before treatment. The cure rate for calves treated with tulathromycin (78%) and tilmicosin (65%) was significantly (P < or = .0001) higher than that of calves treated with saline (23.8%). The cure rate of calves treated with tulathromycin (78.4%) was significantly (P = .0007) higher than that of calves treated with tilmicosin (64.9%). No adverse events related to tulathromycin were reported. Under the conditions of this study, tulathromycin administered as a single-dose treatment was efficacious in the treatment of undifferentiated BRD.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cattle , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Heterocyclic Compounds/administration & dosage , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Male , Nasopharynx/microbiology , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Tylosin/administration & dosage , Tylosin/analogs & derivatives , Tylosin/therapeutic use , United States
17.
Vet Ther ; 6(2): 154-66, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16094563

ABSTRACT

Three studies conducted at feedlots in Colorado, Idaho, and Texas examined the comparative efficacy of tulathromycin injectable solution for the treatment of cattle at high risk of developing undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease (BRD). Each study randomly allocated 250 calves to receive tulathromycin at 2.5 mg/kg and 250 calves to receive either tilmicosin at 10 mg/kg (Colorado site) or florfenicol at 40 mg/kg (Idaho and Texas sites) on arrival at the feedlot. Calves were housed by treatment group in pens with 50 calves/pen. Beginning 3 days after antimicrobial treatment, cattle were observed for signs of BRD daily until harvest. In all three studies, the treatment success rates at 28 days after treatment and at harvest were significantly higher (P < or = .013) for cattle treated with tulathromycin than for cattle treated with either tilmicosin or florfenicol. Fewer tulathromycin-treated cattle were removed from the group as "chronics" or "mortalities" at 28 days posttreatment (P < or = .014) in all three studies. Tulathromycin demonstrated superior efficacy compared with tilmicosin and florfenicol when treating groups of high-risk cattle before the onset of signs of BRD.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cattle , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Heterocyclic Compounds/administration & dosage , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Male , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/etiology , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/pathology , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Thiamphenicol/administration & dosage , Thiamphenicol/analogs & derivatives , Thiamphenicol/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Tylosin/administration & dosage , Tylosin/analogs & derivatives , Tylosin/therapeutic use , United States
18.
Vet Ther ; 6(2): 136-42, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16094561

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of tulathromycin in decreasing the incidence of morbidity and mortality due to bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in 1,239 high-risk cattle was investigated at four US feedlots. Calves not exhibiting clinical signs of BRD received one of three treatments administered subcutaneously in the neck: physiologic saline at 0.02 ml/kg, tulathromycin at 2.5 mg/kg, or tilmicosin at 10 mg/kg. Each treatment group consisted of 413 calves. Calves with clinical signs of BRD and rectal temperatures of 104 degrees F or higher on days 1 through 14 were considered treatment failures (BRD morbidity). Nasopharyngeal swabs from saline-treated morbidities were submitted for isolation and identification of BRD organisms. Respiratory disease morbidity was highest in calves treated with saline and significantly (P < or = .0001) lower in calves administered tulathromycin or tilmicosin. Morbidity from BRD was significantly (P < or = .0001) higher in calves treated with tilmicosin than in calves treated with tulathromycin. Under conditions of this study, tulathromycin, given to calves at high risk of developing BRD, was significantly more effective in reducing BRD morbidity when compared to both saline- and tilmicosin-treated calves.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cattle , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Heterocyclic Compounds/administration & dosage , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Male , Nasopharynx/microbiology , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/etiology , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Tylosin/administration & dosage , Tylosin/analogs & derivatives , Tylosin/therapeutic use
19.
Vet Ther ; 6(2): 167-79, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16094564

ABSTRACT

The therapeutic efficacy and field safety of tulathromycin were evaluated in stocker calves with undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in three field studies conducted over two consecutive grazing seasons in Nebraska. Eight hundred calves exhibiting clinical signs of BRD and with rectal temperatures of 104 degrees F or higher were treated with tulathromycin (n = 340), florfenicol (n = 240), or tilmicosin (n = 220) and evaluated for approximately 60 days. Florfenicol and tilmicosin were administered as single SC injections according to labeled dosage. Tulathromycin was administered as a single SC injection of 2.5 mg/kg. In all three studies, the cure rate of calves 60 days after treatment with tulathromycin was significantly higher (P < or = .05) than that of calves treated with florfenicol or tilmicosin. Suspected adverse reactions were not reported for any of the study drugs. Tulathromycin proved to be significantly more effective than either florfenicol or tilmicosin in the treatment of BRD in stocker calves.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cattle , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Heterocyclic Compounds/administration & dosage , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Male , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/pathology , Recurrence , Severity of Illness Index , Thiamphenicol/administration & dosage , Thiamphenicol/analogs & derivatives , Thiamphenicol/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Tylosin/administration & dosage , Tylosin/analogs & derivatives , Tylosin/therapeutic use , United States , Weight Gain
20.
Vet Ther ; 6(2): 180-96, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16094565

ABSTRACT

Four studies conducted at feedlots in Greeley and Wellington, Colorado; Nebraska; and Texas compared the efficacy of tulathromycin to florfenicol or tilmicosin for the treatment of cattle with undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease (BRD) and subsequent feedlot performance and carcass characteristics. In each study, 100 calves with BRD were treated with tulathromycin given SC at 2.5 mg/kg body weight. At the Greeley, CO, and Nebraska study locations, 100 calves were treated with florfenicol given SC at 40 mg/kg body weight, and at the Wellington, CO, and Texas study locations, tilmicosin was given SC at 10 mg/kg body weight. Cure rate, a derived variable that included assessments of mortality, rectal temperature, and attitude and respiratory scores from day 3 to day 28 and day 3 through harvest, was the primary assessment of BRD efficacy. Cure rates of calves treated with tulathromycin were significantly (P < or = .009) higher than those calves treated with florfenicol. At Wellington, CO, the cure rate of calves treated with tulathromycin was significantly higher (P < or = .018) compared with tilmicosin-treated calves. The differences in cure rates between tulathromycin and tilmicosin treatment groups in the Texas study were not significantly different (P > .05). Tulathromycin was more efficacious in the treatment of undifferentiated BRD compared with florfenicol and, in one study, compared with tilmicosin.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cattle , Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Heterocyclic Compounds/administration & dosage , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Male , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/pathology , Recurrence , Severity of Illness Index , Thiamphenicol/administration & dosage , Thiamphenicol/analogs & derivatives , Thiamphenicol/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Tylosin/administration & dosage , Tylosin/analogs & derivatives , Tylosin/therapeutic use , United States , Weight Gain
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...