Use of Pain Management Champions to Enhance Guideline Implementation by Care Workers in Nursing Homes.

BACKGROUND: Underutilization of evidence-based pain management in nursing homes (NHs) is common. Evidence toward effective approaches to improve adoption of evidence-based practices in NHs is limited. Application of theory in evaluation approaches can increase understanding of implementation challenges. AIM: To get a better understanding of the impact of implementation strategies by exploring the underlying mechanisms using behavioral theory. METHODS: This mixed-methods study is embedded in an implementation-effectiveness study of a pain management guideline in four Swiss NHs. To evaluate our implementation strategies, training workshops were held, and trained pain champions were introduced. We also developed a conceptual framework. Based on Bandura's self-efficacy theory, we hypothesized how our implementation strategies might affect changes in care workers' behavior. Care workers' questionnaire surveys were conducted at baseline (n = 136), after 3 months (n = 99), and after 6 months (n = 83) to assess self-efficacy in pain management and self-reported guideline adoption. We computed linear mixed-effect models to assess changes over time in self-efficacy and logistic regressions to assess associations between self-efficacy and guideline adoption. Concurrently, we conducted focus groups with care workers (n = 8) to explore their response to the implementation strategies. RESULTS: Overall, there was a significant increase in self-efficacy at both time points (p < .001). We found significant associations between self-efficacy and adoption of two guideline components, that is, performing a comprehensive pain assessment and using observational pain assessment tools in cognitively impaired residents. Qualitative findings showed that implementation strategies were received positively by care workers. Focus group participants reported more attentiveness to residents' pain experience. The participants also reported increases in assessment and documentation of pain with more detail than before. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Our findings highlighted that the training and use of pain champions increased self-efficacy and thereby induced behavior change leading to guideline adoption. Regarding persistent implementation challenges, a theory-based conceptual model contributes to the overall understanding.

Perception and opinion of nursing faculties regarding advocacy role: A qualitative research.

BACKGROUND: The nursing literature emphasizes that there are still inadequacies, differences, and inconsistencies in the definition of nurses' advocacy role, and that nursing education plays an important role in educating nurses for patient advocacy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this descriptive qualitative study is to determine nurse academics' perception of and opinions about advocacy in nursing. METHODS: The study group consisted of five academics working as nurse educators in a university. A questionnaire and focus group interview methods were used to collect the data. RESULTS: A framework that consisted of three categories, including the scope of advocacy in nursing; today's health system and advocacy; nurses' foundation/knowledge base for an advocacy role was set by considering the opinions of participants. CONCLUSION: It was emphasized that nurse academics regarded advocacy as an ethical obligation and saw it from a broad perspective including social justice, that changing health system has increased the importance of advocacy role in nursing, that the personality characteristics of prospective nurses are important, and that nursing education should be improved in terms of advocacy.

Ethical Advocacy Across the Autism Spectrum: Beyond Partial Representation.

Recent debates within the autism advocacy community have raised difficult questions about who can credibly act as a representative of a particular population and what responsibilities that role entails. We attempt to answer these questions by defending a set of evaluative criteria that can be used to assess the legitimacy of advocacy organizations and other nonelectoral representatives. With these criteria in hand, we identify a form of misrepresentation common but not unique to autism advocacy, which we refer to as partial representation. Partial representation occurs when an actor claims to represent a particular group of people but appropriately engages with only a subset of that group. After highlighting symbolic and substantive harms associated with partial representation, we propose several strategies for overcoming it.

Promoting Population Health: Nurse Advocacy, Policy Making, and Use of Media.

Nurses need to actively embrace strategies to improve population health outcomes and reduce health and other disparities. Effective strategies include a focus on the broad range of factors and conditions that have a strong influence on health, advocacy directed at reducing barriers to improved population health, and engagement in policy making. Media engagement is an important tool for amplifying messages about societal problems amenable to public policy, educating stakeholders, bringing diverse stakeholders together for a common purpose, and promoting policy change.

Segurança do paciente e o envolvimento do cidadão: reflexões sobre a atuação das ouvidorias hospitalares do Sistema Único de Saúde / Patient safety and citizen involvement: reflections on the performance of hospital ombudsmen of the Unified Health System

O presente trabalho teve por objetivo oferecer subsídios para a promoção do envolvimento do paciente e familiares na notificação de eventos adversos e na melhoria contínua dos cuidados de saúde, através da atuação das ouvidorias hospitalares do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). As ouvidorias hospitalares possuem potencial para atuar na identificação de incidentes / eventos adversos, pois em sua prática já acolhem manifestações similares as que são informadas no sistema de notificação da vigilância sanitária. Além disso são canais de mediação e promoção de direitos e deveres do cidadão e contribuem para a melhoria da comunicação institucional. Para atingir tais objetivos, discorreu-se acerca da importância do sistema de notificação de eventos adversos no Brasil, o papel das Ouvidorias do SUS e considerações sobre o envolvimento do paciente na sua segurança. A metodologia adotada foi a revisão bibliográfica através da pesquisa exploratória e integrativa. Como resultado concluiu-se que as ouvidorias hospitalares podem contribuir para o envolvimento do paciente na segurança dos cuidados de saúde, sendo necessário para tal que ocorra o realinhamento de processos operacionais e a capacitação dos profissionais que atuam nas ouvidorias hospitalares.

Marginally Represented Patients and the Moral Authority of Surrogates.

Incapacitated adult patients are commonly divided into two groups for purposes of decision making; those with a surrogate and those without. Respectively, these groups are often referred to as represented and unrepresented, and the relative ethics of decision making between them raises two particular issues. The first issue involves the differential application of the best interests standard between groups. Second is the prevailing notion that representedness and unrepresentedness are categorical phenomena, though it is more aptly understood as a multidimensional and continuous variable based on relational moral authority. This paper examines the nature of representedness as it relates to ethical norms of surrogate decision making.

[The expert patient: a new key stakeholder in the global healthcare system]. / Le patient-expert - Un nouvel acteur clé du système de santé.

TITLE: Le patient-expert - Un nouvel acteur clé du système de santé. ABSTRACT: Dans les maladies rares, l'expertise est limitée, les connaissances restreintes, les parcours de soins incertains et les traitements inexistants ou peu efficaces. Pour améliorer les prises en charge, il est nécessaire de tirer parti de toutes les expertises disponibles, y compris celles des malades, certains d'entre eux étant devenus de véritables patients-experts.

The "Rules of the Road": Ethics, Firearms, and the Physician's "Lane".

Physicians play a critical role in preventing and treating firearm injury, although the scope of that role remains contentious and lacks systematic definition. This piece aims to utilize the fundamental principles of medical ethics to present a framework for physician involvement in firearm violence. Physicians' agency relationship with their patients creates ethical obligations grounded on three principles of medical ethics - patient autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. Taken together, they suggest that physicians ought to engage in clinical screening and treatment related to firearm violence. The principle of beneficence also applies more generally, but more weakly, to relations between physicians and society, creating nonobligatory moral ideals. Balanced against physicians' primary obligations to patient agency relationships, general beneficence suggests that physicians may engage in public advocacy to address gun violence, although they are not ethically obligated to do so. A fourth foundational principle - justice - requires that clinicians attempt to ensure that the benefits and burdens of healthcare are distributed fairly.

16. Diabetes Advocacy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2019.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Evidence versus advocacy, as related to radiofrequency denervation in the treatment of chronic low back pain and the MINT trials.

In 2017, JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association published the results of the MINT trials, prospective research involving 681 patients, all of whom received exercise therapy for low back pain. Half of the patients were randomized to additionally receive radiofrequency denervation (RFD) treatment. 88% of patients completed the 3-month follow-up, and 77% completed the 12-month follow-up. In this context, RFD provided no added benefit over the baseline of exercise therapy. In 2018, five authors, all experts in pain medicine, published a 'Daring Discourse' article in the journal Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (RAPM), criticizing the findings of the MINT trials. Although 3 of the 5 authors of the RAPM 'Daring Discourse' article reported in conflict of interest statements-as is appropriate-that they were consultants to corporations that produce RFD equipment, the authors failed to disclose that 4 of 5 are on the editorial board of RAPM and all 5 are current officers in the medical organization that owns RAPM: that is, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Noteworthy, there was no published response from the MINT trial investigators to the Daring Discourse criticisms, either in the aforementioned example or in downstream venues where some of the same Daring Discourse authors continued their widely disseminated criticisms of the JAMA/MINT trials report. We believe that these actions taken by the Daring Discourse authors and RAPM have unfairly tipped the scales in the evaluation and application of RFD treatment of low back pain. In our commentary, we discuss: (1) the challenges associated with using clinical trials to predict clinical efficacy, (2) appropriate and inappropriate uses of postpublication commentary on original research findings, (3) the use of inappropriate commentary (and related means) to alter clinical practice in the presence of contradictory research findings, and (4) potential conflicts of interest related to the authors' and Journal's publication of the unopposed MINT trials criticism.

The advocacy role of nurses in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: The decision whether to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation may sometimes be ethically complex. While studies have addressed some of these issues, along with the role of nurses in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, most have not considered the importance of nurses acting as advocates for their patients with respect to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: To explore what the nurse's advocacy role is in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from the perspective of patients, relatives, and health professionals in the Basque Country (Spain). RESEARCH DESIGN: An exploratory critical qualitative study was conducted from October 2015 to March 2016. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. PARTICIPANTS: Four discussion groups were held: one with patients and relatives (n = 8), two with nurses (n = 7 and n = 6, respectively), and one with physicians (n = 5). ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Approval was obtained from the Basque Country Clinical Research Ethics Committee. FINDINGS: Three significant themes were identified: (a) accompanying patients during end of life in a context of medical dominance, (b) maintaining the pact of silence, and (c) yielding to legal uncertainty and concerns. DISCUSSION: The values and beliefs of the actors involved, as well as pre-established social and institutional rules reduced nurses' advocacy to that of intermediaries between the physician and the family within the hospital environment. On the contrary, in primary health care, nurses participated more actively within the interdisciplinary team. CONCLUSION: This study provides key information for the improvement and empowerment for ethical nursing practice in a cardiac arrest, and provides the perspective of patients and relatives, nurses and physicians.

Developing a Patient Charter for People Living With Conditions, Diseases, or Traumas Involving the Skin [Formula: see text].

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown disparities in the perception of skin disease burden between patients and physicians, with patients often feeling that the severity, emotional impact, and social repercussions of their skin condition are underestimated. Although physician's professional behavior is guided by documents such as the Hippocratic Oath, there are no patient-driven principles to guide healthcare interactions involving skin concerns. OBJECTIVE: To develop a concise and practical charter for patients based on their perceptions of unmet needs with the goals of helping patients express their needs and exercise their rights to accessing and utilizing the healthcare system for conditions, diseases, or traumas involving the skin. METHODS: An initial literature review examined healthcare delivery concerns of patients with skin conditions. Results were used to draft a charter that was reviewed by a Canadian patient focus group representing various skin condition advocacy groups. A revised charter was reviewed by Canadian dermatologists before being formally approved by the Canadian Skin Patient Alliance Board and endorsed by the Canadian Dermatology Association. RESULTS: The Patient Charter comprises 8 principles for providing and receiving professional services for the skin in the healthcare setting. CONCLUSIONS: This Patient Charter provides direct insights into patient priorities and will be used as an educational and advocacy tool in healthcare, occupational, and social settings. The intended goal is for the Patient Charter to empower patients and to educate health professions, government, industry, and society at large. Accordingly, the charter will be disseminated through print materials, informational videos, and social media campaigns.

Advocacy With Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence: What It Is, What It Isn't, and Why It's Critically Important.

Survivors of intimate partner violence arrive at the doors of domestic violence (DV) programs with a wide variety of needs, including long-term safety and healing, housing, economic stability, health and well-being, and community connection. Although some DV programs offer holistic approaches to survivors, many focus the vast majority of their attention and resources on providing emotional support and safety planning rather than advocating with survivors for their access to needed resources and opportunities. Although services focused on emotional support and safety planning are important, they alone are not likely to result in the life changes that many survivors are seeking. Programs that provide genuine advocacy for survivors-defined as partnering with them to represent their rights and interests while linking them to concrete resources, protections, and opportunities-have been found to be effective and well received. Although an early pillar of DV programs, this type of advocacy has fallen by the wayside in many agencies. In this article, the authors make a case for re-invigorating advocacy efforts designed to improve the life circumstances of survivors. We argue that such efforts will make DV programs more relevant and sought after by a wider range of survivors and that agencies will see real change occur at both the individual and community levels.