Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.953
Filter
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 125(4): 678-691, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34894361

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Survivorship care plans (SCP) should outline pertinent information about cancer treatment and follow-up. METHODS: We descriptively analyzed the content of 74 colorectal cancer SCPs completed as part of a randomized, controlled trial of SCPs at an academic and community cancer center. Surveillance recommendations were compared with American Cancer Society, American Society of Clinical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. RESULTS: SCP information provided in >80% of the plans included participant age, cancer diagnosis, details, and side-effects of treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation) and health promotion recommendations. SCP content documented less frequently included predisposing conditions, genetic counseling/testing information and staging. Posttreatment surveillance recommendations were documented in >90% SCPs. For stage 2-3 cancer, rates of guideline concordant recommendations were 100% for colonoscopy surveillance (Year 1 only), 87% for imaging surveillance, 65% for carcinoembryonic antigen surveillance, and 33% for follow-up visits. Excluding colonoscopy, >15 unique recommendations were listed for each modality across stages and sites, with more variation at the academic site. CONCLUSIONS: SCPs consistently recorded information about cancer diagnosis and treatment but omitted critical information about cancer-specific details denoting risk. Surveillance recommendations varied considerably between cancer centers. Future work to improve the consistency of surveillance recommendations documented in SCPs may be needed.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Continuity of Patient Care/standards , Documentation/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Care Planning/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Survival Rate , Survivorship
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 78(19): 1863-1871, 2021 11 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34696957

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Survivors of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair remain at risk for long-term complications. Guidelines recommend postoperative imaging surveillance, but adherence is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to define the real-world frequency of postoperative imaging and characterize long-term outcomes of ATAAD. METHODS: Population-based administrative health databases for Ontario, Canada, were linked to identify patients who underwent ATAAD repair and survived at least 90 days. Guideline-directed imaging surveillance (GDIS) was defined as undergoing a computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging scan at 6 and 12 months postoperatively and then annually thereafter. Multivariable time-to-event analysis explored the associations between GDIS and all-cause mortality and reintervention. RESULTS: A total of 888 patients who survived urgent ATAAD repair between April 1, 2005, and March 31, 2018, were included. Median follow-up after ATAAD repair was 5.2 years (interquartile range: 2.4-7.9 years). A total of 14% patients received GDIS throughout follow-up. At 6 years, 3.9% of patients had received GDIS. The mortality rate was 4% at 1 year, 14% at 5 years, and 29% at 10 years. Incidence of aortic reintervention was 3% at 1 year, 9% at 5 years, and 17% at 10 years; the majority of these were urgent (68%), and they carried a 9% 30-day mortality rate. Greater adherence to GDIS was associated with mortality (hazard ratio: 1.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.11) and reintervention (hazard ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to GDIS following ATAAD repair is poor, while long-term mortality and reinterventions remain substantial. Further research is needed to determine if guidelines should be modified.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm , Aortic Dissection , Long Term Adverse Effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Postoperative Complications , Reoperation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Aortic Dissection/epidemiology , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm/etiology , Aortic Aneurysm/surgery , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Long Term Adverse Effects/diagnosis , Long Term Adverse Effects/etiology , Long Term Adverse Effects/mortality , Long Term Adverse Effects/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Needs Assessment , Ontario/epidemiology , Patient Care Planning/standards , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Postoperative Period , Reoperation/adverse effects , Reoperation/methods , Reoperation/mortality , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods
3.
London; NICE; Oct. 29, 2021. 87 p. tab.
Monography in English | BIGG - GRADE guidelines | ID: biblio-1357589

ABSTRACT

This guideline covers diagnosing and managing myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy)/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) in children, young people and adults. It aims to improve awareness and understanding about ME/CFS and when to suspect it, so that people are diagnosed earlier. It includes recommendations on diagnosis, assessment and care planning, safeguarding, access to care and managing ME/CFS and its symptoms. These recommendations were developed based on evidence reviewed before the COVID-19 pandemic. We have not reviewed evidence on the effects of COVID-19, so it should not be assumed that these recommendations apply to people diagnosed with post-COVID-19 syndrome. NICE has produced a guideline on managing the long-term effects of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Patient Care Planning/standards , Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/complications
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(31): e26826, 2021 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34397846

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: To develop a new prognostic model for the overall survival of patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) using Korean Renal Cancer Study Group (KRoCS) database and compared it with 2 renowned prognostic models: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and the international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium (IMDC) models.Data of 790 patients diagnosed with mRCC and receiving targeted therapy as their first-line treatment were pooled to this study. Data from 4 hospitals (n = 619) were used to develop the new model and those from other 5 hospitals (n = 171) were used for external validation. After detecting prognostic factors in multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis, patients were classified into 3 risk groups, favorable (0), intermediate (1-2), and poor (3 and more) by the number of prognostic factors.Seven variables such as more than 2 metastasis sites, no prior nephrectomy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, low hemoglobin, high serum corrected calcium, high neutrophil, high serum alkaline phosphatase were identified as prognostic factors for poor overall survival. Also, risk groups were categorized into 3 groups; median overall survival was 61.1 months in favorable, 26.5 months in intermediate, and 6.8 months in poor group. KRoCS ranked the first in all 3 statistical parameters including akaike information criterion (AIC), concordance index and generalized R2 among other prognostic models.We developed the KRoCS model and validated it externally with demonstrating its superiority over MSKCC and IMDC models. The KRoCS model can provide useful information for counseling patients with clear cell mRCC regarding life-expectancy.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Life Expectancy , Models, Statistical , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Patient Care Planning/standards , Risk Assessment , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Quality Improvement , Reproducibility of Results , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/standards , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis
7.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(15): e021598, 2021 08 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34315235

ABSTRACT

Background Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease has been associated with early-term delivery and cesarean delivery (CD). We implemented a multi-institutional standardized clinical assessment and management plan (SCAMP) through the University of California Fetal-Maternal Consortium. Our objective was to decrease early-term (37-39 weeks) delivery and CD in pregnancies complicated by fetal congenital heart disease using a SCAMP methodology to improve practice in a high-risk and clinically complex setting. Methods and Results University of California Fetal-Maternal Consortium site-specific management decisions were queried following SCAMP implementation. This contemporary intervention group was compared with a University of California Fetal-Maternal Consortium historical cohort. Primary outcomes were early-term delivery and CD. A total of 496 maternal-fetal dyads with prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease were identified, 185 and 311 in the historical and intervention cohorts, respectively. Recommendation for later delivery resulted in a later gestational age at delivery (38.9 versus 38.1 weeks, P=0.01). After adjusting for maternal age and site, historical controls were more likely to have a CD (odds ratio [OR],1.8; 95% CI, 2.1-2.8; P=0.004) and more likely (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.3) to have an early-term delivery than the intervention group. Vaginal delivery was recommended in 77% of the cohort, resulting in 61% vaginal deliveries versus 50% in the control cohort (P=0.03). Among pregnancies with major cardiac lesions (n=373), vaginal birth increased from 51% to 64% (P=0.008) and deliveries ≥39 weeks increased from 33% to 48% (P=0.004). Conclusions Implementation of a SCAMP decreased the rate of early-term deliveries and CD for prenatal congenital heart disease. Development of clinical pathways may help standardize care, decrease maternal risk secondary to CD, improve neonatal outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Delivery, Obstetric , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnosis , Patient Care Planning , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Prenatal Care , Risk Adjustment/methods , Adult , California/epidemiology , Cesarean Section/methods , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Cesarean Section/trends , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Delivery, Obstetric/trends , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Age , Patient Care Planning/economics , Patient Care Planning/organization & administration , Patient Care Planning/standards , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Prenatal Care/methods , Prenatal Care/standards , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Quality Improvement/organization & administration
8.
J Endocrinol Invest ; 44(12): 2545-2555, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34304388

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To offer a practical guide for the presurgical and anesthetic management of pheochromocytomas and sympathetic paragangliomas (PGLs). METHODS: This protocol was based on a comprehensive review of the literature and on our own multidisciplinary team's experience from managing pheochromocytoma and sympathetic PGLs at a referral center. RESULTS: Patients with pheochromocytomas and sympathetic paragangliomas (PGLs) may develop potentially life-threatening complications, especially during surgical procedures. A complete biochemical, radiological, genetic, and cardiological assessment is recommended in the preoperative stage as it provides an evaluation of the risk of surgical complications and malignancy, allowing individualization of the presurgical treatment. Treatment with α-blockade and proper volume expansion in the preoperative stage significantly reduces the perioperative morbidity. During surgery, the anesthesiologist should look for a deep anesthetic level that inhibits the cardiovascular effects of catecholamines to minimize the risk of intraoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: An optimal presurgical evaluation of pheochromocytomas/ sympathetic PGL requires a multidisciplinary approach, including a complete hormonal, radiological, cardiac, genetic, and functioning evaluation in most cases. A proper preoperative evaluation in combination with strict blood pressure and heart rate control, and blood volume status optimization, will significantly reduce the risk of intraoperative and perioperative complications. In those patients who unfortunately develop intraoperative complications, the role of the anesthesiologist is essential since the selection of the appropriate management has a direct impact on morbimortality reduction.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/surgery , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Paraganglioma/surgery , Pheochromocytoma/surgery , Preoperative Care/methods , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Paraganglioma/pathology , Patient Care Planning/standards , Pheochromocytoma/pathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Adjustment
13.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(7): 3933-3942, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33392770

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Few data are known about cancer management in frail nursing home residents. METHODS: Objective of our prospective, interventional study was to set up in the Marseille area, a care pathway for nursing homes residents with a suspected cancer. It combined cancer diagnosis procedures and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), both made in our geriatric oncology outpatient unit, before oncologic advice for treatment decision. In standard care, CGA is carried out after therapeutic decision, to determine whether the planned treatment is compatible with the patient's frailties. CGA and quality of life were performed at enrolment and at 6 months. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03103659). RESULTS: Between April 2017 and March 2020, 48 residents from 38 nursing homes were included: 24 had the care pathway (PP), and 24 the standard care (NPP). Six were excluded (no cancer). PP had more frailties than NPP. All PP and 75% of NPP had outpatient care. Curative treatment was given to 77% of NPP (including chemotherapy in 10 cases), and 25% of PP (surgery, radiotherapy, hormone therapy). A majority of PP (75%) had supportive care. At 6 months, 16 patients died (11 NPP, 5 PP). Quality of life evolution was available for 11 PP and 7NPP: it showed stability in PP and degradation in NPP. CONCLUSION: Even if part of residents were too frail to get curative treatment, the care pathway enabled them to benefit from oncologic advice and appropriate supportive care while preserving their quality of life. Further investigations are needed to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/therapy , Nursing Homes/standards , Patient Care Planning/standards , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies
14.
Prof Case Manag ; 26(2): 62-69, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33507016

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the disease known as COVID-19, case management has emerged as a critical intervention in the treatment of cases, particularly for patients with severe symptoms and medical complications. In addition, case managers have been on the front lines of the response across the health care spectrum to reduce risks of contagion, including among health care workers. The purpose of this article is to discuss the case management response, highlighting the importance of individual care plans to provide access to the right care and treatment at the right time to address both the consequences of the disease and patient comorbidities. PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTINGS: The COVID-19 response spans the full continuum of health and human services, including acute care, subacute care, workers' compensation (especially catastrophic case management), home health, primary care, and community-based care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE: From the earliest days of the pandemic, case managers have assumed an important role on the front lines of the medical response to COVID-19, ensuring that procedures are in place for managing a range of patients: those who were symptomatic but able to self-isolate and care for themselves at home; those who had serious symptoms and needed to be hospitalized; and those who were asymptomatic and needed to be educated about the importance of self-isolating. Across the care spectrum, individualized responses to the clinical and psychosocial needs of patients with COVID-19 in acute care, subacute care, home health, and other outpatient settings have been guided by the well-established case management process of screening, assessing, planning, implementing, following up, transitioning, and evaluating. In addition, professional case managers are guided by values such as advocacy, ensuring access to the right care and treatment at the right time; autonomy, respecting the right to self-determination; and justice, promoting fairness and equity in access to resources and treatment. The value of justice also addresses the sobering reality that people from racial and ethnic minority groups are at an increased risk of getting sick and dying from COVID-19. Going forward, case management will continue to play a major role in supporting patients with COVID-19, in both inpatient and outpatient settings, with telephonic follow-up and greater use of telehealth.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/nursing , Case Management/standards , Critical Care Nursing/education , Health Personnel/education , Health Personnel/psychology , Patient Care Planning/standards , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Adult , Case Management/statistics & numerical data , Curriculum , Education, Nursing, Continuing , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Patient Care Planning/statistics & numerical data , Patient-Centered Care/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2
15.
J Burn Care Res ; 42(5): 1011-1016, 2021 09 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33517434

ABSTRACT

In nursing education, the rate of students to practice for burn patient care is low. This research was carried out as a single-blind randomized control group intervention trial to determine the effectiveness of simulation method performed using high-fidelity human patient simulator in nursing students' burn patient care planning. The research was conducted with randomly selected 61 students including 31 in intervention and 30 in control groups. In the application process of the research, knowledge tests were administered as a pretest, second test, and posttest, and the first and second applications of burn patient care plans were performed with all students. In the research, the application of burn patient scenario was performed only with the intervention group. As a result of the research, it was found that the posttest knowledge scores of the students in the intervention group increased significantly compared with the control group (P < .05). According to the intergroup evaluations, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in terms of care plan scores (P > .05), whereas the scores for the second burn patient care plan of the intervention group were higher compared with those of the control group. The simulation method was found to increase students' knowledge levels, and the employment of the method in nursing education is recommended.


Subject(s)
Burns/nursing , Clinical Competence/standards , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Patient Care Planning/standards , Patient Simulation , Education, Nursing/methods , Humans , Single-Blind Method , Students, Nursing
16.
J Hepatol ; 75(1): 142-149, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33476745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with cirrhosis and significant coronary artery disease (CAD) are at risk of peri-liver transplantation (LT) cardiac events. The coronary artery disease in liver transplantation (CAD-LT) score and algorithm aim to predict the risk of significant CAD in LT candidates and guide pre-LT cardiac evaluation. METHODS: Patients who underwent pre-LT evaluation at Indiana University (2010-2019) were studied retrospectively. Stress echocardiography (SE) and cardiac catheterization (CATH) reports were reviewed. CATH was performed for predefined CAD risk factors, irrespective of normal SE. Significant CAD was defined as CAD requiring percutaneous or surgical intervention. A multivariate regression model was constructed to assess risk factors. Receiver-operating curve analysis was used to compute a point-based risk score and a stratified testing algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 1,771 pre-LT patients underwent cardiac evaluation, including results from 1,634 SE and 1,266 CATH assessments. Risk-adjusted predictors of significant CAD at CATH were older age (adjusted odds ratio 1.05; 95% CI 1.03-1.08), male sex (1.69; 1.16-2.50), diabetes (1.57; 1.12-2.22), hypertension (1.61; 1.14-2.28), tobacco use (pack years) (1.01; 1.00-1.02), family history of CAD (1.63; 1.16-2.28), and personal history of CAD (6.55; 4.33-9.90). The CAD-LT score stratified significant CAD risk as low (≤2%), intermediate (3% to 9%), and high (≥10%). Among patients who underwent CATH, a risk-based testing algorithm (low: no testing; intermediate: non-invasive testing vs. CATH; high: CATH) would have identified 97% of all significant CAD and potentially avoided unnecessary testing (669 SE [57%] and 561 CATH [44%]). CONCLUSIONS: The CAD-LT score and algorithm (available at www.cad-lt.com) effectively stratify pre-LT risk for significant CAD. This may guide more targeted testing of candidates with fewer tests and faster time to waitlist. LAY SUMMARY: The coronary artery disease in liver transplantation (CAD-LT) score and algorithm effectively stratify patients based on their risk of significant coronary artery disease. The CAD-LT algorithm can be used to guide a more targeted cardiac evaluation prior to liver transplantation.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Liver Cirrhosis , Risk Adjustment/methods , Age Factors , Algorithms , Comorbidity , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Disease/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis/surgery , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/methods , Male , Medical History Taking , Middle Aged , Patient Care Planning/standards , Preoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/standards , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Smoking/epidemiology
17.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 68(3): e28884, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33416214

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Self-management interventions for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer are needed. The present study reports on the acceptability and feasibility of delivering survivorship care plans (SCPs) and an accompanying app to AYA. PROCEDURE: AYA (n = 224) ages 15-29 who completed treatment for cancer were randomized and received a digital SCP only or an SCP plus a mobile app intended to enhance self-management. For 16 weeks, the app delivered one to two daily messages complementing information in their SCP and tailored based on age, treatment, and health goal. Data are presented on feasibility, self-reported acceptability (including satisfaction and perceived benefits) and its relationship to app engagement (for those in app group), and feedback from qualitative interviews conducted with 10 AYA. RESULTS: The SCP and app proved feasible as evidenced by high recruitment and retention, access to technology, time analysis, moderate app engagement, and minimal technical issues. However, 12% reported never reading the SCP and 8% never used the app. The app and SCP were acceptable to AYA, and SCP acceptability ratings did not differ between groups. For those with the app, acceptability was positively related to message engagement. AYA recommended enhanced individualization and design features of the SCP and app. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the use of tailored SCPs and mobile health interventions for most AYA, as well as the need for further refinement and research. Delivery of SCPs and digital interventions are acceptable and feasible to AYA survivors, and may help promote health-related knowledge and survivorship self-management.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Health Promotion , Mobile Applications/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Patient Care Planning/standards , Survivorship , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Motivation , Prognosis , Survival Rate , Young Adult
18.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 27(2): 283-287, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32290764

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To implement and optimize a pilot transitions of care model for scheduled chemotherapy admissions in patients with hematologic malignancies at our institution.Methodology: We utilized the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) quality improvement technique to prospectively measure success of interventions related to improving transitions of care processes that occurred in multiple stages including development of standardized operating procedures, electronic medical record documentation, and education to the malignant hematology multidisciplinary group. Chart review was performed retrospectively for at least nine patients per PDSA cycle. Areas of intervention addressed and measured regarding communication between the ambulatory care and acute care settings included: admission purpose, processes related to insurance benefits investigations for specialty medications required in the post-discharge setting, and plan for growth factors, prophylactic antimicrobials, and follow-up.Results and conclusions: We included 28 patients and performed a total of three PDSA cycles demonstrating specific improvements in: communication regarding status of benefits investigations performed for specialty medications prior to admission, resolution of these benefits investigations at various time points, improvement in efficient use of the electronic medical record for chemotherapy orders, and patient instructions for appropriate use of prophylactic antimicrobials. Although improvement was noted initially with prescribing of discharge antiemetics and antimicrobials, regression to baseline was noted with the third PDSA cycle.


Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Insurance Benefits , Insurance, Health , Patient Transfer/standards , Quality Improvement , Communication , Documentation , Electronic Health Records , Female , Humans , Male , Medication Systems, Hospital , Middle Aged , Patient Admission/standards , Patient Care Planning/standards , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Transfer/organization & administration , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Retrospective Studies
19.
Can J Diabetes ; 45(1): 15-21, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32800762

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify perceptions of safety and effectiveness of a provincial type 1 diabetes school care plan, and to best inform future improvements in school care to accommodate the shifting needs of families, best clinical practices and new medical technologies. METHODS: A cross-sectional satisfaction and feedback questionnaire to inform quality improvement was offered to both families of children with type 1 diabetes who receive care at school through a Delegated Diabetes Care Plan and to their program coordinators during the 2017‒2018 school year. RESULTS: The response rate was 29.8% (160 of 537) for families and 68.2% (45 of 66) for coordinators. The majority of parents and coordinators reported that the care plan is meeting both safety and diabetes management needs. On a 7-point Likert scale, the safety score, expressed as mean (standard deviation), was 6.0 (1.2) by families and 5.7 (1.3) by coordinators, with higher scores reflecting greater satisfaction. Diabetes management was rated 5.6 (1.2) out of 7 by families, and 5.4 (0.8) out of 7 by coordinators. Families and coordinators expressed the need for individualization of care, and suggested modifications to how information is presented. There was near-unanimous support for future integration of continuous glucose-monitoring devices into the school setting. CONCLUSIONS: British Columbia's provision of diabetes care in the school setting is overall perceived to be safe and is generally well received by families and coordinators. In this study, we provide valuable information to improve the care of children with type 1 diabetes in schools, including support for further individualization of care and future integration of diabetes technology into the school setting.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Parents/psychology , Patient Care Planning/standards , Schools/standards , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 102(3): 521-531, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33065124

ABSTRACT

Although significant advances have been made in measuring the outcomes of rehabilitation interventions, comparably less progress has been made in measuring the treatment processes that lead to improved outcomes. A recently developed framework called the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) has potential to identify which clinician actions (ie, ingredients) actively improve specific patient functions (ie, targets). However, the RTSS does not provide methodology for standardly identifying specific unique targets or ingredients. Without a method to evaluate the uniqueness of an individual target or ingredient, it is difficult to know whether variations in treatment descriptions are synonymous (ie, different words describing the same treatment) or meaningfully different (eg, different words describing different treatments or variations of the same treatment). A recent project used vocal rehabilitation ingredients and targets to create RTSS-based lists of unique overarching target and ingredient categories with underlying dimensions describing how individual ingredients and targets vary within those categories. The primary purpose of this article is to describe the challenges encountered during the project and the methodology developed to address those challenges. Because the methodology was based on the RTSS's broadly applicable framework, it can be used across all areas of rehabilitation regardless of the discipline (speech-language pathology, physical therapy, occupational therapy, psychology, etc) or impairment domain (language, cognition, ambulation, upper extremity training, etc). The resulting standard operationalized lists of targets and ingredients have high face and content validity. The lists may also facilitate implementation of the RTSS in research, education, interdisciplinary communication, and everyday treatment.


Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making , Clinical Protocols/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Care Planning/standards , Rehabilitation/standards , Delphi Technique , Humans , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...