ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acute otitis media (AOM) is the inflammation of the middle ear. It constitutes one of the most frequent infections which affects children and usually occurs between 6 to 24 months of age. AOM can emerge due to viruses and/or bacteria. The aim of the current systematic review is to assess in children between 6 months and 12 years of age with AOM, the efficacy of any antimicrobial agent or placebo compared with amoxicillinclavulanate, to measure the resolution of AOM or symptoms. METHODS: The medical databases PubMed (MEDLINE) and Web of Science were used. Data extraction and analysis were performed by two independent reviewers. Eligibility criteria were set, and only randomised control trials (RCTs) were included. Critical appraisal of the eligible studies was performed. Pooled analysis was conducted using the Review Manager v. 5.4.1 software (RevMan). RESULTS: Twelve RCTs were totally included. Three (25.0%) RCTs studied the impact of azithromycin, two (16.7%) investigated the impact of cefdinir, two (16.7%) investigated placebo, three (25.0%) studied quinolones, one (8.3%) investigated cefaclor and one (8.3%) studied penicillin V, compared to amoxicillin-clavulanate. In five (41.7%) RCTs, amoxicillin-clavulanate proved to be superior to azithromycin, cefdinir, placebo, cefaclor and penicillin V, while in seven (58.3%) RCTs its efficacy was comparable with other antimicrobials or placebo. The rates of AOM relapse after treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanate were comparable to those of other antimicrobials or placebo. However, amoxicillin-clavulanate was more effective in eradicating Streptococcus pneumoniae from the culture, when compared to cefdinir. The results of the meta-analysis were not evaluated due to substantial heterogeneity between studies. CONCLUSIONS: Amoxicillin-clavulanate should be the treatment of choice for children between 6 months and 12 years of age with AOM.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Otitis Media , Child , Humans , Infant , Acute Disease , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Cefaclor/therapeutic use , Cefdinir/therapeutic use , Otitis Media/drug therapy , Otitis Media/microbiology , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Peritonsillar abscess is a localised infection in the peritonsillar space. Pus from the abscess can contain anaerobes. Many clinicians prescribe metronidazole in addition to penicillin, but evidence to support this is limited. This review assessed the evidence of benefit of metronidazole for the treatment of peritonsillar abscess. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of the literature and databases including Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, PubMed and Cochrane library. Search terms included all variations of peritonsillar abscess, penicillin and metronidazole. RESULTS: Three randomised, control trials were included. All studies assessed the clinical outcomes after treatment for peritonsillar abscess, including recurrence rate, length of hospital stay and symptom improvement. There was no evidence to suggest additional benefit with metronidazole, with studies suggesting increased side effects. CONCLUSION: Evidence does not support the addition of metronidazole in first-line management of peritonsillar abscess. Further trials to establish optimum dose and duration schedules of oral phenoxymethylpenicillin would benefit clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Peritonsillar Abscess , Humans , Peritonsillar Abscess/therapy , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Penicillins/therapeutic use , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Drainage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recurrent cellulitis is a challenging clinical condition affecting up to 47% of patients after the first episode, especially those with predisposing risk factors. The purpose of this review is to describe the state of the art of literature evidence and to highlight recent developments in its management. RECENT FINDINGS: Recurrent cellulitis can occur after successful treatment of cellulitis. Conditions that commonly increase the risk of cellulitis include local and systemic modifiable and nonmodifiable factors. A rigorous approach to the management of risk factors and treatment of acute infection is important as the risk of recurrence rises with repeated episodes. Risk factors, if present, need to be targeted in association with antibiotic prophylaxis. Penicillin V is the preferred antibiotic for prevention but other antibiotics and new drugs can be considered in cases of ß-lactam allergy, intolerance, or failure. SUMMARY: Recurrent cellulitis is associated with short term and long-term morbidity as well as significant healthcare costs. Management of underlying predisposing conditions is crucial to prevent recurrence in addition with evaluation of pharmacological measures, but specialized and multidisciplinary skills are needed. More efforts are needed to prevent and treat this underestimated problem.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cellulitis , Humans , Cellulitis/drug therapy , Cellulitis/prevention & control , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Secondary Prevention , Chronic Disease , RecurrenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sore throat is a common reason for prescribing antibiotics in primary care, and 10 days of treatment is recommended for patients with pharyngotonsillitis with group A streptococcus (GAS). Our group recently showed that penicillin V (PcV) four times daily for 5 days was non-inferior in clinical outcome to PcV three times daily for 10 days. This study compares duration, intensity of symptoms, and side effects in patients with a Centor Score (CS) of 3 or 4 respectively, after treatment with PcV for 5 or 10 days and evaluates whether all patients with pharyngotonsillitis with a CS of 3 or 4 should be treated for 5 days or if severity of symptoms or CS suggest a longer treatment period. METHOD: Data on symptoms and recovery from patient diaries from 433 patients included in a RCT comparing PcV 800 mg × 4 for 5 days or PcV 1 g × 3 for 10 days was used. Patients six years and older with CS-3 or CS-4 and positive rapid antigen detection test for GAS-infection were grouped based on CS and randomized treatment. Comparisons for categorical variables were made with Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Patients with CS-3 as well as patients with CS-4 who received PcV 800 mg × 4 for 5 days self-reported that they recovered earlier compared to patients with CS-3 or CS-4 who received treatment with PcV 1 g × 3 for 10 days. In addition, the throat pain as single symptom was relieved 1 day earlier in patients with CS-4 and 5 days of treatment compared to patients with CS-4 and 10 days of treatment. No differences in side effects between the groups were found. CONCLUSION: Intense treatment with PcV four times a day for 5 days seems clinically beneficial and strengthens the suggestion that the 4-dose regimen with 800 mg PcV for 5 days may be the future treatment strategy for GAS positive pharyngotonsillitis irrespectively of CS-3 or CS-4. Trail registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02712307 (3 April 2016).
Subject(s)
Pharyngitis , Streptococcal Infections , Tonsillitis , Humans , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Pharyngitis/drug therapy , Primary Health Care , Prospective Studies , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Streptococcus pyogenes , Tonsillitis/drug therapySubject(s)
Arthralgia/microbiology , Fever/microbiology , Pharyngitis/microbiology , Rheumatic Fever/microbiology , Streptococcal Infections/diagnosis , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Arthralgia/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Naproxen/therapeutic use , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Pharyngitis/drug therapy , Rheumatic Fever/drug therapy , Secondary Prevention , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between the use of macrolide antibiotics in pregnancy and the risk of major birth defects. DESIGN: Nationwide, register based cohort study. SETTING: Denmark, 1997-2016. PARTICIPANTS: Of 1 192 539 live birth pregnancies, pregnancies during which macrolides had been used (13 019) were compared with those during which penicillin (that is, phenoxymethylpenicillin) had been used (matched in a 1:1 ratio on propensity scores). Other comparative groups were pregnancies when macrolides had been used recently but before pregnancy (matched 1:1) and pregnancies where no antibiotics had been used (matched 1:4). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Association with an outcome of any major birth defect and specific subgroups of birth defects were assessed by relative risk ratios and absolute risk differences. RESULTS: In matched comparisons, 457 infants were born with major birth defects to women who had used macrolides during pregnancy (35.1 per 1000 pregnancies) compared with 481 infants (37.0 per 1000 pregnancies) to women who had used penicillin (relative risk ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.08), corresponding to an absolute risk difference of -1.8 (95% confidence interval -6.4 to 2.7) per 1000 pregnancies. The risk of major birth defects was not significantly increased for women who had used macrolides during pregnancy compared with those who had used macrolides recently but before becoming pregnant (relative risk ratio 1.00 (95% confidence interval 0.88 to 1.14); absolute risk difference -0.1 (95% confidence interval -4.8 to 4.7) per 1000 pregnancies) or compared with women who did not use any antibiotics (1.05 (0.95 to 1.17); 1.8 (-1.7 to 5.3) per 1000 pregnancies). For all three comparative group analyses and in the analyses of use of individual macrolides, no significant increased risk of specific subgroups of birth defects associated with the use of macrolides was found. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide cohort study, the use of macrolide antibiotics in pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of major birth defects. Analyses of the associated risk of 12 specific subgroups of birth defects with the use of macrolides in pregnancy were not significant.
Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Propensity Score , RegistriesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prescribing in dental practice has a relatively small but important contribution to the quantity of antibiotics prescribed in primary care. This study aimed to analyse antibiotic prescribing in dentistry over time (2010-2016) in 4 different Northern European countries and their relative contribution to national outpatients consumption. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the frequency and number of national antibiotic prescriptions written by dentists in England, Scotland, Norway and Sweden. The consumption of such antibiotics was measured using WHO defined daily doses (DDDs), DDDs per 100,000 inhabitants per day (DIDs100,000). RESULTS: A total of more than 27 million prescriptions (27,026,599) archived between 2010 and 2016 from the four countries were analysed. The national contribution of Norwegian dentists to the total primary care prescription during this period was 8%. The corresponding figures for Sweden, Scotland and England were 7, 6, and 8%. Dental contribution to National antibiotic use in all four countries has decreased over the study time period for commonly prescribed antibiotics in dentistry, i.e., the beta-lactams (Phenoxymethyl penicillin/Amoxicillin) and metronidazole. There were less numbers of prescriptions by dentists in Norway and Sweden compared to England and Scotland. Marked differences in some classes of antibiotics were noted with Phenoxymethyl penicillin dominating in Sweden/Norway compared to Amoxicillin and Metronidazole in England/Scotland. In England and Scotland, dentists were the largest prescribers of metronidazole in primary care. Clindamycin prescriptions was higher in Norway and Sweden. CONCLUSION: Noticeable differences exist in prescribing patterns for the management of oral infections. High levels of metronidazole use in England and Scotland also require further analysis. All countries over the study period showed a decrease in total numbers of antibiotics prescribed.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Clindamycin/therapeutic use , England/epidemiology , Humans , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Norway/epidemiology , Penicillin V/analogs & derivatives , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Scotland/epidemiology , Spiramycin/therapeutic use , Sweden/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Norwegian guideline recommendations on first-line empirical antibiotic prescribing in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are penicillin G/V in monotherapy, or penicillin G in combination with gentamicin (or cefotaxime) in severely ill patients. The aim of this study was to explore how different empirical antibiotic treatments impact on length of hospital stay (LOS) and 30-day hospital readmission. A secondary aim was to describe median intravenous- and total treatment duration. METHODS: We included CAP patients (≥18 years age) hospitalised in North Norway during 2010 and 2012 in a retrospective study. Patients with negative chest x-ray, malignancies or immunosuppression or frequent readmissions were excluded. We collected data on patient characteristics, empirical antibiotic prescribing, treatment duration and clinical outcomes from electronic patient records and the hospital administrative system. We used directed acyclic graphs for statistical model selection, and analysed data with mulitvariable logistic and linear regression. RESULTS: We included 651 patients. Median age was 77 years [IQR; 64-84] and 46.5% were female. Median LOS was 4 days [IQR; 3-6], 30-day readmission rate was 14.4% and 30-day mortality rate was 6.9%. Penicillin G/V were empirically prescribed in monotherapy in 51.5% of patients, penicillin G and gentamicin in combination in 22.9% and other antibiotics in 25.6% of patients. Prescribing other antibiotics than penicillin G/V monotherapy was associated with increased risk of readmission [OR 1.9, 95% CI; 1.08-3.42]. Empirical antibiotic prescribing was not associated with LOS. Median intravenous- and total treatment duration was 3.0 [IQR; 2-5] and 11.0 [IQR; 9.8-13] days. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that empirical prescribing with penicillin G/V in monotherapy in hospitalised non-severe CAP-patients, without complicating factors such as malignancy, immunosuppression and frequent readmission, is associated with lower risk of 30-day readmission compared to other antibiotic treatments. Median total treatment duration exceeds treatment recommendations.
Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Penicillin G/therapeutic use , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Community-Acquired Infections/mortality , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Norway/epidemiology , Pneumonia/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic overuse has led to the global emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and children are among the most frequent users of antibiotics. Most studies with broad-spectrum antibiotics show a severe impact on resistome development in patients. Although narrow-spectrum antibiotics are believed to have fewer side effects, their impact on the microbiome and resistome is mostly unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the narrow-spectrum antibiotic phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V) on the microbiome and resistome of a child treated for acute otitis media. METHODS: Oral and faecal samples were collected from a 1-year-old child before (Day 0) and after (Days 5 and 30) receiving penicillin V for otitis media. Metagenomic sequencing data were analysed to determine taxonomic profiling using Kraken and Bracken software, and resistance profiling using KMA in combination with the ResFinder database. RESULTS: In the oral samples, antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) belonging to four classes were identified at baseline. At Day 5, the abundance of some ARGs was increased, whereas some remained unchanged and others could no longer be detected. At Day 30, most ARGs had returned to baseline levels or lower. In the faecal samples, seven ARGs were observed at baseline and five at Day 5. At Day 30, the number of ARGs had increased to 21. CONCLUSIONS: Following penicillin V, we observed a remarkable enrichment of the aecal resistome, indicating that even narrow-spectrum antibiotics may have important consequences in selecting for a more resistant microbiome.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteria/classification , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Metagenomics/methods , Otitis Media/microbiology , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Feces/microbiology , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial/drug effects , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Infant , Male , Mouth/microbiology , Otitis Media/drug therapy , Penicillin V/pharmacology , Phylogeny , Sequence Analysis, DNAABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease that affects approximately two per cent of the general population. Plaque psoriasis is the most common form: it usually appears as raised, red patches of inflamed skin, covered with silvery white scales. The patches often occur in a symmetrical pattern. Guttate psoriasis is a particular form of psoriasis with widespread, small erythematosquamous lesions. Streptococcal infection is suspected to be a triggering factor for the onset of guttate psoriasis, and flare-up of chronic plaque psoriasis. The previous Cochrane Review on this topic was published in 2000; it required an update because antistreptococcal treatment continues to be used to treat psoriasis, especially for the acute form of guttate psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of antistreptococcal interventions for guttate and chronic plaque psoriasis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, Cochrane Register of Studies Online, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and five trials registers (January 2019). We checked the reference lists of included and excluded studies and searched conference proceedings from the American Academy of Dermatology, Society for Investigative Dermatology, and European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing antistreptococcal interventions (tonsillectomy or systemic antibiotic treatment) in people with clinically diagnosed acute guttate and chronic plaque psoriasis compared with placebo, no intervention, or each other. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary outcome measures were: 1) time-to-resolution; achieving clear or almost clear skin (Physician Global Assessment (PGA) 0 or 1 or Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 or 100); 2) proportion of participants with adverse effects and severe adverse effects. Secondary outcomes were: 1) proportion of participants achieving clear or almost clear skin; 2) proportion of participants achieving PASI 75 or PGA 1 to 2; 3) risk of having at least one relapse at long-term follow-up. Short-term assessment was defined as within eight weeks of the start of treatment; long-term was at least one year after the start of treatment. MAIN RESULTS: We included five trials (162 randomised participants); three were conducted in a hospital dermatology department. One study declared funding by a pharmaceutical company. Participants' ages ranged from 12 to 77 years; only two participants were younger than 15 years. Mean PASI score at baseline varied from 5.7 (i.e. mild) to 23 (i.e. severe) in four studies. Twenty-three of 162 participants had streptococcus-positive throat swab culture. We did not perform a meta-analysis due to heterogeneity of participants' characteristics and interventions.None of the trials measured our efficacy primary outcome, time-to-resolution, or the secondary outcome, risk of having at least one relapse at long-term follow-up.We rated the quality of the results as very low-quality evidence, due to high risk of bias (absence of blinding of participants and caregivers, and high risk of outcome reporting bias) and imprecision (single study data with a low number of events). Hence, we are very uncertain about the results presented.Guttate psoriasisOne three-armed trial (N = 43) assessed penicillin (50,000 international units (IU)/kg/day in three doses) versus erythromycin (250 mg four times per day) versus no treatment (treatment for 14 days, with six-week follow-up from start of treatment). Adverse events and the proportion of participants achieving clear or almost clear skin were not measured.One trial (N = 20) assessed penicillin (1.6 MU (million units) intramuscularly once a day) versus no treatment (six weeks of treatment, with eight-week follow-up from start of treatment). At six-week (short-term) follow-up, no adverse events were observed in either group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the proportion of participants with clear or almost clear skin (risk ratio (RR) 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 5.85).One trial (N = 20) assessed rifampicin (300 mg twice daily) versus placebo (14-day treatment duration; six-week follow-up from start of treatment); none of the review outcomes were measured.These trials did not measure the proportion of participants achieving PASI 75 or PGA 1 to 2.Chronic plaque psoriasisOne trial (N = 50) assessed long-term azithromycin treatment (500 mg daily dose) versus vitamin C. Adverse events were reported in the azithromycin group (10 out of 30 had nausea and mild abdominal upset), but not in the vitamin C group. The proportion of participants who achieved clear or almost clear skin was not measured. In the azithromycin group, 18/30 versus 0/20 participants in the vitamin C group reached PASI 75 at the end of 48 weeks of treatment (RR 25.06, 95% CI 1.60 to 393.59).One trial (N = 29) assessed tonsillectomy versus no treatment, with 24-month follow-up after surgery. One participant in the tonsillectomy group had minor bleeding. At eight-week follow-up, 1/15 in the tonsillectomy group, and 0/14 in the no treatment group achieved PASI 90; and 3/15 participants in the tonsillectomy group, and 0/14 in the no treatment group achieved PASI 75 (RR 6.56, 95% CI 0.37 to 116.7). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found only five trials (N = 162), which assessed the effects of five comparisons (systemic antibiotic treatment (penicillin, azithromycin) or tonsillectomy). Two comparisons (erythromycin compared to no treatment, and rifampicin compared to placebo) did not measure any of the outcomes of interest. There was very low-quality evidence for the outcomes that were measured, Therefore, we are uncertain of both the efficacy and safety of antistreptococcal interventions for guttate and chronic plaque psoriasis.The included trials were at unclear or high risk of bias and involved only a small number of unrepresentative participants, with limited measurement of our outcomes of interest. The studies did not allow investigation into the influence of Streptococcal infection, and a key intervention (amoxicillin) was not assessed.Further trials assessing the efficacy and tolerance of penicillin V or amoxicillin are needed in children and young adults with guttate psoriasis.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Ascorbic Acid/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Child , Erythromycin/therapeutic use , Humans , Middle Aged , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Psoriasis/microbiology , Psoriasis/pathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rifampin/therapeutic use , Tonsillectomy , Vitamins/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Congenital syphilis is a prevalent infection in much of the world but rare in contexts where antenatal screening and treatment are available. In the UK in 2016, three cases of congenital syphilis were reported in babies born to women who were seronegative at the time of booking and hence a high degree of clinical vigilance is required in the unwell infant. We present the case of a seven-week-old baby girl with congenital syphilis with the unusual finding of discrete liver lesions. This baby was successfully treated with intravenous ceftriaxone.
Subject(s)
Bones of Lower Extremity/diagnostic imaging , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Syphilis, Congenital/diagnosis , Treponema pallidum/isolation & purification , Administration, Intravenous , Administration, Oral , Biopsy , Ceftriaxone/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Syphilis, Congenital/blood , Syphilis, Congenital/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Treponema pallidum/genetics , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Dental pain can have a detrimental effect on quality of life. Symptomatic apical periodontitis and acute apical abscess are common causes of dental pain and arise from an inflamed or necrotic dental pulp, or infection of the pulpless root canal system. Clinical guidelines recommend that the first-line treatment for teeth with these conditions should be removal of the source of inflammation or infection by local, operative measures, and that systemic antibiotics are currently only recommended for situations where there is evidence of spreading infection (cellulitis, lymph node involvement, diffuse swelling) or systemic involvement (fever, malaise). Despite this, there is evidence that dentists frequently prescribe antibiotics in the absence of these signs. There is concern that this could contribute to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacterial colonies within both the individual and the community. This review is an update of the original version that was published in 2014. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of systemic antibiotics provided with or without surgical intervention (such as extraction, incision and drainage of a swelling, or endodontic treatment), with or without analgesics, for symptomatic apical periodontitis and acute apical abscess in adults. SEARCH METHODS: Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist searched the following databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 26 February 2018), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 1) in the Cochrane Library (searched 26 February 2018), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 26 February 2018), Embase Ovid (1980 to 26 February 2018), and CINAHL EBSCO (1937 to 26 February 2018). The US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register (ClinicalTrials.gov) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched for ongoing trials. A grey literature search was conducted using OpenGrey (to 26 February 2018) and ZETOC Conference Proceedings (1993 to 26 February 2018). No restrictions were placed on the language or date of publication when searching the electronic databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of systemic antibiotics in adults with a clinical diagnosis of symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess, with or without surgical intervention (considered in this situation to be extraction, incision and drainage or endodontic treatment) and with or without analgesics. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors screened the results of the searches against inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias independently and in duplicate. We calculated mean differences (MD) (standardised mean difference (SMD) when different scales were reported) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for continuous data. A fixed-effect model was used in the meta-analysis as there were fewer than four studies. We contacted study authors to obtain missing information. MAIN RESULTS: We included two trials in this review, with 62 participants included in the analyses. Both trials were conducted in university dental schools in the USA and compared the effects of oral penicillin V potassium (penicillin VK) versus a matched placebo when provided in conjunction with a surgical intervention (total or partial pulpectomy) and analgesics to adults with acute apical abscess or symptomatic necrotic tooth. The patients included in these trials had no signs of spreading infection or systemic involvement (fever, malaise). We assessed one study as having a high risk of bias and the other study as having unclear risk of bias.The primary outcome variables reported in both studies were participant-reported pain and swelling (one trial also reported participant-reported percussion pain). One study reported the type and number of analgesics taken by participants. One study recorded the incidence of postoperative endodontic flare-ups (people who returned with symptoms that necessitated further treatment). Adverse effects, as reported in one study, were diarrhoea (one participant, placebo group) and fatigue and reduced energy postoperatively (one participant, antibiotic group). Neither study reported quality of life measurements.Objective 1: systemic antibiotics versus placebo with surgical intervention and analgesics for symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscessTwo studies provided data for the comparison between systemic antibiotics (penicillin VK) and a matched placebo for adults with acute apical abscess or a symptomatic necrotic tooth when provided in conjunction with a surgical intervention. Participants in one study all underwent a total pulpectomy of the affected tooth, while participants in the other study had their tooth treated by either partial or total pulpectomy. Participants in both trials received oral analgesics. There were no statistically significant differences in participant-reported measures of pain or swelling at any of the time points assessed within the review. The MD for pain (short ordinal numerical scale 0 to 3) was -0.03 (95% CI -0.53 to 0.47) at 24 hours; 0.32 (95% CI -0.22 to 0.86) at 48 hours; and 0.08 (95% CI -0.38 to 0.54) at 72 hours. The SMD for swelling was 0.27 (95% CI -0.23 to 0.78) at 24 hours; 0.04 (95% CI -0.47 to 0.55) at 48 hours; and 0.02 (95% CI -0.49 to 0.52) at 72 hours. The body of evidence was assessed as at very low quality.Objective 2: systemic antibiotics without surgical intervention for adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscessWe found no studies that compared the effects of systemic antibiotics with a matched placebo delivered without a surgical intervention for symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess in adults. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is very low-quality evidence that is insufficient to determine the effects of systemic antibiotics on adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Periapical Abscess/drug therapy , Periapical Periodontitis/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Adult , Humans , Periapical Abscess/surgery , Periapical Periodontitis/surgery , Pulpectomy/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Toothache/drug therapyABSTRACT
Hepatic hydrothorax refers to the presence of a pleural effusion (usually >500 mL) in a patient with cirrhosis in whom other causes of pleural effusion, such as cardiopulmonary causes, pleural disease or malignancy have been excluded. It is seen in 5%-10% of patients with end-stage liver disease. A subset of these patients can develop infection of the hepatic hydrothorax, called spontaneous bacterial empyema. They may present with fever, chills and dyspnoea. We present the case of an 83-year-old man with a history of cirrhosis who developed a large right-sided pleural effusion, confirmed to be empyema by pleural fluid analysis. We aim to highlight the occurrence of spontaneous bacterial empyema. While less common that spontaneous bacterial peritonitis as a complication of cirrhosis, it is equally serious with potential for adverse outcomes.
Subject(s)
Empyema, Pleural/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis , Pleural Effusion/diagnosis , Streptococcal Infections/diagnosis , Streptococcus pyogenes , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Empyema, Pleural/complications , Empyema, Pleural/diagnostic imaging , Empyema, Pleural/therapy , Humans , Male , Penicillin V/administration & dosage , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Pleural Effusion/complications , Pleural Effusion/diagnostic imaging , Pleural Effusion/therapy , Radiography, Thoracic , Streptococcal Infections/complications , Streptococcal Infections/diagnostic imaging , Streptococcal Infections/therapy , ThoracentesisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare the three most commonly used antibiotics for erythema migrans (EM) in Norwegian primary care. METHODS: A randomized, parallel, controlled trial was carried out. Treatments were open to the patients, but blinded for the GPs and investigators. Patients eligible for inclusion were aged ≥18 years and clinically diagnosed with EM. Block randomization was processed in blocks of six. Patients were assigned to receive one of three antibiotic treatments for 14 days: phenoxymethylpenicillin (PCV), amoxicillin, or doxycycline. The primary outcome was the duration of EM in days in the three treatment groups. Patients kept a diary for the 14 days of treatment, in which they registered concomitant symptoms and side effects. The patients consulted their GP after 14 days of treatment and had a 1-year follow-up to monitor any development of disseminated Lyme borreliosis (LB). EMs with a duration of more than 14 days were followed until resolution. ClinicalTrials.govNCT01368341 and EU Clinical Trials Register 2010-023747-15. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty eight patients (PCV: n = 56, amoxicillin: n = 64, doxycycline: n = 68) were included by 44 Norwegian general practitioners (GPs) from June 2011 to November 2013. Follow-up was completed by December 2014. The median duration of EM was altogether 14 days (range 3-293). For the PCV group median duration was 14 days (range 5-91), for amoxicillin 13 days (range 4-179) and for doxycycline 14 days (range 3-293). The duration of EM did not differ significantly between the three antibiotic groups (p 0.277). None of the patients developed disseminated LB within the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find 14 days of PCV, doxycycline, and amoxicillin treatments to differ in effectiveness or safety in the treatment of clinically diagnosed EM in primary care.
Subject(s)
Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Doxycycline/therapeutic use , Erythema Chronicum Migrans/drug therapy , Lyme Disease/drug therapy , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Amoxicillin/administration & dosage , Amoxicillin/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Doxycycline/administration & dosage , Doxycycline/adverse effects , Erythema Chronicum Migrans/epidemiology , Erythema Chronicum Migrans/microbiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , General Practice/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Lyme Disease/epidemiology , Lyme Disease/microbiology , Male , Middle Aged , Norway/epidemiology , Penicillin V/administration & dosage , Penicillin V/adverse effects , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In Denmark, the use of amoxicillin is widespread among children, despite phenoxymethylpenicillin being recommended as first-line therapy. The reason for this apparent discrepancy is not fully understood. We aimed at evaluating prescribing patterns of antibiotics among Danish children 0-4 years of age, with emphasis on incidence of treatment episodes, choice of initial antibiotic treatment and switching patterns between different types of antibiotics. METHODS: We identified all children ≤4 years of age who filled a prescription of antibiotics from 2000 to 2015 according to the nationwide Danish National Prescription Registry. We estimated the incidence rate of episodes treated with antibiotics and the choice of initial antibiotic treatment over time. Further, we assessed the cumulative risk of switching within 0-3 days after initiating therapy. RESULTS: We identified 3,481,684 antibiotic treatment episodes issued to 0- to 4-year-olds from 2000 to 2015. The incidence rate was stable until 2011 both among children 0-1 years of age (approximately 880/1000) and among children 2-4 years of age (approximately 610/1000), after which it dropped. Phenoxymethylpenicillin and, increasingly, amoxicillin were most frequently used as initial treatments (39% vs. 44%). Few switched from amoxicillin (1%) or phenoxymethylpenicillin (4.7%) within the first 3 days. Of those who switched from phenoxymethylpenicillin, 64% received amoxicillin as second-line treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of episodes treated with antibiotics among Danish children 0-4 years of age has decreased considerably since 2011. In contrast to guideline recommendations, amoxicillin is the most frequently used initial treatment. Early switching between antibiotics is uncommon. Initiatives should address the extensive use of amoxicillin.
Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Substitution/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child, Preschool , Denmark , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Penicillin V/therapeutic useABSTRACT
This guideline sets out an antimicrobial prescribing strategy for acute sore throat. It aims to limit antibiotic use and reduce antimicrobial resistance. Acute sore throat is often caused by a virus, lasts for about a week, and most people get better without antibiotics. Withholding antibiotics rarely leads to complications.
Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adult , Pharyngitis , Pharyngitis/drug therapy , Pharyngitis/therapy , Erythromycin/therapeutic use , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Comparative information on diagnosis-related antibiotic prescribing patterns are scarce from primary care within and between countries. To describe and compare antibiotic prescription and routine management of infections in primary care in Latvia (LV), Lithuania (LT) and two study sites in Sweden (SE), a cross-sectional observational study on patients who consulted due to sypmtoms compatible with infection was undetraken. Infection and treatment was detected and recorded by physicians only. Data was collected from altogether 8786 consecutive patients with infections in the three countries. Although the overall proportion of patients receiving an antibiotic prescription was similar in all three countries (LV and LT 42%, SE 38%), there were differences in the rate of prescription between the countries depending on the respective diagnoses. While penicillins dominated among prescriptions (LV 58%, LT 67%, SE 70%), phenoxymethylpenicillin was most commonly prescribed in Sweden (57% of all penicillins), while it was amoxicillin with or without clavulanic acid in Latvia (99%) and Lithuania (85%) respectively. Pivmecillinam and flucloxacillin, which accounted for 29% of penicillins in Sweden, were available neither in Latvia nor in Lithuania. The applied methodology was simple, and provided useful information on differences in treatment of common infections in ambulatory care in the absence of available computerized diagnosis-prescription data. Despite some limitations, the method can be used for assessment of intention to treat and compliance to treatment guidelines and benchmarking locally, nationally, or internationally, just as the point prevalence surveys (PPS) protocols have been used in hospitals all over Europe.