Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 378
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11136, 2024 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750119

ABSTRACT

Gradual elevation of the periosteum from the original bone surface, based on the principle of distraction osteogenesis, induces endogenous hard and soft tissue formation. This study aimed to assess the impact of alternating protocols of activation with relaxation (periosteal pumping) on bone modeling and remodeling. One hundred and sixty-two adult male Wistar rats were used in this study. Four test groups with different pumping protocols were created based on the relaxation applied. Two control groups underwent an activation period without relaxation or only a single activation. One group was sham-operated. Periosteal pumping without period of activation induced gene expression in bone and bone remodeling, and following activation period enhanced bone modeling. Four test groups and control group with activation period equaled the values of bone modeling at the end-consolidation period, showing significant downregulation of Sost in the bone and periosteum compared to that in the sham group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). When all test groups were pooled together, plate elevation from the bony surface increased bone remodeling on day 45 of the observation period (p = 0.003). Furthermore, bone modeling was significantly affected by plate elevation on days 17 and 45 (p = 0.047 and p = 0.005, respectively) and by pumping protocol on day 31 (p = 0.042). Periosteal pumping was beneficial for increasing bone repair when the periosteum remained in contact with the underlaying bony surface during the manipulation period. Following periosteal elevation, periosteal pumping accelerated bone formation from the bony surface by the modeling process.


Subject(s)
Bone Remodeling , Periosteum , Rats, Wistar , Animals , Periosteum/metabolism , Male , Bone Remodeling/physiology , Rats , Osteogenesis/physiology , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods
2.
Theranostics ; 14(6): 2544-2559, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646641

ABSTRACT

Background: Mechanical forces are indispensable for bone healing, disruption of which is recognized as a contributing cause to nonunion or delayed union. However, the underlying mechanism of mechanical regulation of fracture healing is elusive. Methods: We used the lineage-tracing mouse model, conditional knockout depletion mouse model, hindlimb unloading model and single-cell RNA sequencing to analyze the crucial roles of mechanosensitive protein polycystin-1 (PC1, Pkd1) promotes periosteal stem/progenitor cells (PSPCs) osteochondral differentiation in fracture healing. Results: Our results showed that cathepsin (Ctsk)-positive PSPCs are fracture-responsive and mechanosensitive and can differentiate into osteoblasts and chondrocytes during fracture repair. We found that polycystin-1 declines markedly in PSPCs with mechanical unloading while increasing in response to mechanical stimulus. Mice with conditional depletion of Pkd1 in Ctsk+ PSPCs show impaired osteochondrogenesis, reduced cortical bone formation, delayed fracture healing, and diminished responsiveness to mechanical unloading. Mechanistically, PC1 facilitates nuclear translocation of transcriptional coactivator TAZ via PC1 C-terminal tail cleavage, enhancing osteochondral differentiation potential of PSPCs. Pharmacological intervention of the PC1-TAZ axis and promotion of TAZ nuclear translocation using Zinc01442821 enhances fracture healing and alleviates delayed union or nonunion induced by mechanical unloading. Conclusion: Our study reveals that Ctsk+ PSPCs within the callus can sense mechanical forces through the PC1-TAZ axis, targeting which represents great therapeutic potential for delayed fracture union or nonunion.


Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing , Cell Differentiation , Chondrocytes , Fracture Healing , Osteogenesis , Stem Cells , TRPP Cation Channels , Animals , Fracture Healing/physiology , Mice , TRPP Cation Channels/metabolism , TRPP Cation Channels/genetics , Chondrocytes/metabolism , Stem Cells/metabolism , Osteogenesis/physiology , Mice, Knockout , Chondrogenesis/physiology , Periosteum/metabolism , Osteoblasts/metabolism , Osteoblasts/physiology , Disease Models, Animal , Male
3.
J Biol Chem ; 300(4): 107158, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479598

ABSTRACT

Single-cell RNA-seq has led to novel designations for mesenchymal cells associated with bone as well as multiple designations for what appear to be the same cell type. The main goals of this study were to increase the amount of single-cell RNA sequence data for osteoblasts and osteocytes, to compare cells from the periosteum to those inside bone, and to clarify the major categories of cell types associated with murine bone. We created an atlas of murine bone-associated cells by harmonizing published datasets with in-house data from cells targeted by Osx1-Cre and Dmp1-Cre driver strains. Cells from periosteal bone were analyzed separately from those isolated from the endosteum and trabecular bone. Over 100,000 mesenchymal cells were mapped to reveal 11 major clusters designated fibro-1, fibro-2, chondrocytes, articular chondrocytes, tenocytes, adipo-Cxcl12 abundant reticular (CAR), osteo-CAR, preosteoblasts, osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteo-X, the latter defined in part by periostin expression. Osteo-X, osteo-CAR, and preosteoblasts were closely associated with osteoblasts at the trabecular bone surface. Wnt16 was expressed in multiple cell types from the periosteum but not in cells from endocortical or cancellous bone. Fibro-2 cells, which express markers of stem cells, localized to the periosteum but not trabecular bone in adult mice. Suppressing bone remodeling eliminated osteoblasts and altered gene expression in preosteoblasts but did not change the abundance or location of osteo-X or osteo-CAR cells. These results provide a framework for identifying bone cell types in murine single-cell RNA-seq datasets and suggest that osteoblast progenitors reside near the surface of remodeling bone.


Subject(s)
Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Osteoblasts , Osteocytes , Periosteum , Animals , Mice , Chondrocytes/metabolism , Chondrocytes/cytology , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/cytology , Osteoblasts/metabolism , Osteoblasts/cytology , Osteocytes/metabolism , Osteocytes/cytology , Periosteum/cytology , Periosteum/metabolism , Single-Cell Analysis , Mice, Inbred C57BL
4.
Dev Cell ; 59(9): 1192-1209.e6, 2024 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38554700

ABSTRACT

Bone is regarded as one of few tissues that heals without fibrous scar. The outer layer of the periosteum is covered with fibrous tissue, whose function in bone formation is unknown. We herein developed a system to distinguish the fate of fibrous-layer periosteal cells (FL-PCs) from the skeletal stem/progenitor cells (SSPCs) in the cambium-layer periosteum and bone marrow in mice. We showed that FL-PCs did not participate in steady-state osteogenesis, but formed the main body of fibrocartilaginous callus during fracture healing. Moreover, FL-PCs invaded the cambium-layer periosteum and bone marrow after fracture, forming neo-SSPCs that continued to maintain the healed bones throughout adulthood. The FL-PC-derived neo-SSPCs expressed lower levels of osteogenic signature genes and displayed lower osteogenic differentiation activity than the preexisting SSPCs. Consistent with this, healed bones were thinner and formed more slowly than normal bones. Thus, the fibrous periosteum becomes the cellular origin of bones after fracture and alters bone properties permanently.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation , Fracture Healing , Fractures, Bone , Osteogenesis , Periosteum , Animals , Periosteum/metabolism , Mice , Osteogenesis/physiology , Fracture Healing/physiology , Fractures, Bone/pathology , Fractures, Bone/metabolism , Stem Cells/metabolism , Stem Cells/cytology , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Bony Callus/metabolism , Bony Callus/pathology , Male
5.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 120(46): e2312677120, 2023 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37931101

ABSTRACT

We have previously reported that the cortical bone thinning seen in mice lacking the Wnt signaling antagonist Sfrp4 is due in part to impaired periosteal apposition. The periosteum contains cells which function as a reservoir of stem cells and contribute to cortical bone expansion, homeostasis, and repair. However, the local or paracrine factors that govern stem cells within the periosteal niche remain elusive. Cathepsin K (Ctsk), together with additional stem cell surface markers, marks a subset of periosteal stem cells (PSCs) which possess self-renewal ability and inducible multipotency. Sfrp4 is expressed in periosteal Ctsk-lineage cells, and Sfrp4 global deletion decreases the pool of PSCs, impairs their clonal multipotency for differentiation into osteoblasts and chondrocytes and formation of bone organoids. Bulk RNA sequencing analysis of Ctsk-lineage PSCs demonstrated that Sfrp4 deletion down-regulates signaling pathways associated with skeletal development, positive regulation of bone mineralization, and wound healing. Supporting these findings, Sfrp4 deletion hampers the periosteal response to bone injury and impairs Ctsk-lineage periosteal cell recruitment. Ctsk-lineage PSCs express the PTH receptor and PTH treatment increases the % of PSCs, a response not seen in the absence of Sfrp4. Importantly, in the absence of Sfrp4, PTH-dependent increase in cortical thickness and periosteal bone formation is markedly impaired. Thus, this study provides insights into the regulation of a specific population of periosteal cells by a secreted local factor, and shows a central role for Sfrp4 in the regulation of Ctsk-lineage periosteal stem cell differentiation and function.


Subject(s)
Osteogenesis , Stem Cell Niche , Mice , Animals , Cathepsin K/metabolism , Periosteum/metabolism , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Wnt Signaling Pathway , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/metabolism
6.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(20)2023 Oct 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37894931

ABSTRACT

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have tremendous therapeutic potential regarding the treatment of bone and musculoskeletal disorders due to their osteo-inductive ability. More than twenty BMPs have been identified in the human body with various functions, such as embryonic development, skeleton genesis, hematopoiesis, and neurogenesis. BMPs can induce the differentiation of MSCs into the osteoblast lineage and promote the proliferation of osteoblasts and chondrocytes. BMP signaling is also involved in tissue remodeling and regeneration processes to maintain homeostasis in adults. In particular, growth factors, such as BMP-2 and BMP-7, have already been approved and are being used as treatments, but it is unclear as to whether they are the most potent BMPs that induce bone formation. According to recent studies, BMP-9 is known to be the most potent inducer of the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, both in vitro and in vivo. However, its exact role in the skeletal system is still unclear. In addition, research results suggest that the molecular mechanism of BMP-9-mediated bone formation is also different from the previously known BMP family, suggesting that research on signaling pathways related to BMP-9-mediated bone formation is actively being conducted. In this study, we performed a phosphorylation array to investigate the signaling mechanism of BMP-9 compared with BMP-2, another influential bone-forming growth factor, and we compared the downstream signaling system. We present a mechanism for the signal transduction of BMP-9, focusing on the previously known pathway and the p53 factor, which is relatively upregulated compared with BMP-2.


Subject(s)
Growth Differentiation Factor 2 , Osteogenesis , Humans , Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2/pharmacology , Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2/metabolism , Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/metabolism , Cell Differentiation , Growth Differentiation Factor 2/metabolism , Osteoblasts/metabolism , Periosteum/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism
7.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ; 15(39): 45549-45560, 2023 Oct 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37747777

ABSTRACT

Massive periosteal defects often significantly impair bone regeneration and repair, which have become a major clinical challenge. Unfortunately, current engineered periosteal materials can hardly currently focus on achieving high tissue adhesion property, being suitable for cell growth, and inducing cell orientation concurrently to meet the properties of nature periosteum. Additionally, the preparation of oriented surface nanotopography often relies on professional equipment. In this study, inspired by the oriented collagen structure of nature periosteum, we present a composite artificial periosteum with a layer of oriented nanotopography surface containing carbon nanotubes (CNTs), cross-linked with adhesive polydopamine (PDA) hydrogel on both terminals. An oriented surface structure that can simulate the oriented alignment of periosteal collagen fibers can be quickly and conveniently obtained via a simple stretching of the membrane in a water bath. With the help of CNTs, our artificial periosteum exhibits sufficient mechanical strength and desired oriented nanotopological structure surface, which further induces the directional arrangement of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) on the membrane. These oriented hBMSCs express significantly higher levels of osteogenic genes and proteins, while the resultant composite periosteum can be stably immobilized in vivo in the rat model of massive calvarial defect through the PDA hydrogel, which finally shows promising bone regeneration ability. We anticipate that the developed functional artificial periosteum has great potential in biomedical applications for the treatment of composite defects of the bone and periosteum.


Subject(s)
Nanotubes, Carbon , Periosteum , Rats , Humans , Animals , Periosteum/metabolism , Tissue Adhesions , Osteogenesis , Bone Regeneration , Collagen/metabolism , Hydrogels/chemistry , Tissue Engineering
8.
Adv Healthc Mater ; 12(12): e2203027, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36652677

ABSTRACT

To treat bone defects, repairing the nerve-rich periosteum is critical for repairing the local electric field. In this study, an endogenous electric field is coupled with 2D black phosphorus electroactive periosteum to explore its role in promoting bone regeneration through nerves. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) are used to characterize the electrically active biomimetic periosteum. Here, the in vitro effects exerted by the electrically active periosteum on the transformation of Schwann cells into the repair phenotype, axon initial segment (AIS) and dense core vesicle (DCV) of sensory neurons, and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells are assessed using SEM, immunofluorescence, RNA-sequencing, and calcium ion probes. The electrically active periosteum stimulates Schwann cells into a neuroprotective phenotype via the Fanconi anemia pathway, enhances the AIS effect of sensory neurons, regulates DCV transport, and releases neurotransmitters, promoting the osteogenic transformation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Microcomputed tomography and other in vivo techniques are used to study the effects of the electrically active periosteum on bone regeneration. The results show that the electrically active periosteum promotes nerve-induced osteogenic repair, providing a potential clinical strategy for bone regeneration.


Subject(s)
Fanconi Anemia , Periosteum , Humans , Periosteum/metabolism , Tissue Scaffolds , Tissue Engineering/methods , Biomimetics , Fanconi Anemia/metabolism , X-Ray Microtomography , Bone Regeneration/physiology , Osteogenesis , Signal Transduction
9.
Tissue Eng Part B Rev ; 29(2): 91-102, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36006374

ABSTRACT

The periosteum is quite essential for bone repair. The excellent osteogenic properties of periosteal tissue make it a popular choice for accelerated osteogenesis in tissue engineering. With advances in research and technology, renewed attention has been paid to the periosteum. Recent studies have shown that the complexity of the periosteum is not only limited to histological features but also includes genetic and phenotypic features. In addition, the periosteum is proved to be quite site-specific in many ways. This brings challenges to the selection of periosteal donor sites. Limited understanding of the periosteum sets up barriers to developing optimal tissue regeneration strategies. A better understanding of periosteum could lead to better applications. Therefore, we reviewed the histological structure, gene expression, and function of the periosteum from both the commonality and personalization. It aims to discuss some obscure issues and untapped potential of periosteum and artificial periosteum in the application, where further theoretical research is needed. Overall, the site-specificity of the periosteum needs to be fully considered in future applications. However, significant further work is needed in relevant clinical trials to promote the further development of artificial periosteum.


Subject(s)
Bone Regeneration , Periosteum , Humans , Periosteum/metabolism , Osteogenesis , Tissue Engineering , Wound Healing
10.
Adv Healthc Mater ; 12(1): e2201661, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36189833

ABSTRACT

The bone immune microenvironment (BIM) regulates bone regeneration and affects the prognosis of fractures. However, there is currently no effective strategy that can precisely modulate macrophage polarization to improve BIM for bone regeneration. Herein, a hybridized biphasic bionic periosteum, inspired by the BIM and functional structure of the natural periosteum, is presented. The gel phase is composed of genipin-crosslinked carboxymethyl chitosan and collagen self-assembled hybrid hydrogels, which act as the "dam" to intercept IL-4 released during the initial burst from the bionic periosteum fiber phase, thus maintaining the moderate inflammatory response of M1 macrophages for mesenchymal stem cell recruitment and vascular sprouting at the acute fracture. With the degradation of the gel phase, released IL-4 cooperates with collagen to promote the polarization towards M2 macrophages, which reconfigure the local microenvironment by secreting PDGF-BB and BMP-2 to improve vascular maturation and osteogenesis twofold. In rat cranial defect models, the controlled regulation of the BIM is validated with the temporal transition of the inflammatory/anti-inflammatory process to achieve faster and better bone defect repair. This strategy provides a drug delivery system that constructs a coordinated BIM, so as to break through the predicament of the contradiction between immune response and bone tissue regeneration.


Subject(s)
Interleukin-4 , Periosteum , Rats , Animals , Periosteum/metabolism , Interleukin-4/chemistry , Bionics , Bone Regeneration , Osteogenesis , Collagen/chemistry
11.
Cell Stem Cell ; 29(11): 1547-1561.e6, 2022 Nov 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36272401

ABSTRACT

A fundamental question in bone biology concerns the contributions of skeletal stem/progenitor cells (SSCs) in the bone marrow versus the periosteum to bone repair. We found that SSCs in adult bone marrow can be identified based on Leprcre and Adiponectin-cre/creER expression while SSCs in adult periosteum can be identified based on Gli1creERT2 expression. Under steady-state conditions, new bone arose primarily from bone marrow SSCs. After bone injuries, both SSC populations began proliferating but made very different contributions to bone repair. Drill injuries were primarily repaired by LepR+/Adiponectin+ bone marrow SSCs. Conversely, bicortical fractures were primarily repaired by Gli1+ periosteal SSCs, though LepR+/Adiponectin+ bone marrow cells transiently formed trabecular bone at the fracture site. Gli1+ periosteal cells also regenerated LepR+ bone marrow stromal cells that expressed hematopoietic niche factors at fracture sites. Different bone injuries are thus repaired by different SSCs, with periosteal cells regenerating bone and marrow stroma after non-stabilized fractures.


Subject(s)
Adiponectin , Bone Marrow , Humans , Adult , Zinc Finger Protein GLI1/metabolism , Adiponectin/metabolism , Stem Cells/metabolism , Periosteum/metabolism , Bone Marrow Cells/metabolism
12.
J Bone Miner Res ; 37(8): 1545-1561, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35652423

ABSTRACT

Bone regeneration involves skeletal stem/progenitor cells (SSPCs) recruited from bone marrow, periosteum, and adjacent skeletal muscle. To achieve bone reconstitution after injury, a coordinated cellular and molecular response is required from these cell populations. Here, we show that SSPCs from periosteum and skeletal muscle are enriched in osteochondral progenitors, and more efficiently contribute to endochondral ossification during fracture repair as compared to bone-marrow stromal cells. Single-cell RNA sequencing (RNAseq) analyses of periosteal cells reveal the cellular heterogeneity of periosteum at steady state and in response to bone fracture. Upon fracture, both periosteal and skeletal muscle SSPCs transition from a stem/progenitor to a fibrogenic state prior to chondrogenesis. This common activation pattern in periosteum and skeletal muscle SSPCs is mediated by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling. Functionally, Bmpr1a gene inactivation in platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (Pdgfra)-derived SSPCs impairs bone healing and decreases SSPC proliferation, migration, and osteochondral differentiation. These results uncover a coordinated molecular program driving SSPC activation in periosteum and skeletal muscle toward endochondral ossification during bone regeneration. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Periosteum , Cell Differentiation/physiology , Chondrogenesis , Fractures, Bone/metabolism , Humans , Muscle, Skeletal , Osteogenesis/physiology , Periosteum/metabolism , Stem Cells/metabolism
13.
J Biol Chem ; 298(5): 101833, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35304101

ABSTRACT

Bone marrow development and endochondral bone formation occur simultaneously. During endochondral ossification, periosteal vasculatures and stromal progenitors invade the primary avascular cartilaginous anlage, which induces primitive marrow development. We previously determined that bone marrow podoplanin (PDPN)-expressing stromal cells exist in the perivascular microenvironment and promote megakaryopoiesis and erythropoiesis. In this study, we aimed to examine the involvement of PDPN-expressing stromal cells in postnatal bone marrow generation. Using histological analysis, we observed that periosteum-derived PDPN-expressing stromal cells infiltrated the cartilaginous anlage of the postnatal epiphysis and populated on the primitive vasculature of secondary ossification center. Furthermore, immunophenotyping and cellular characteristic analyses indicated that the PDPN-expressing stromal cells constituted a subpopulation of the skeletal stem cell lineage. In vitro xenovascular model cocultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells and PDPN-expressing skeletal stem cell progenies showed that PDPN-expressing stromal cells maintained vascular integrity via the release of angiogenic factors and vascular basement membrane-related extracellular matrices. We show that in this process, Notch signal activation committed the PDPN-expressing stromal cells into a dominant state with basement membrane-related extracellular matrices, especially type IV collagens. Our findings suggest that the PDPN-expressing stromal cells regulate the integrity of the primitive vasculatures in the epiphyseal nascent marrow. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to comprehensively examine how PDPN-expressing stromal cells contribute to marrow development and homeostasis.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow , Periosteum , Bone Marrow/metabolism , Endothelial Cells/metabolism , Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells , Humans , Membrane Glycoproteins/genetics , Membrane Glycoproteins/metabolism , Periosteum/metabolism , Stromal Cells/metabolism
14.
Cell Death Dis ; 13(2): 123, 2022 02 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35136023

ABSTRACT

Low testosterone level is an independent predictor of osteoporotic fracture in elderly men as well as increased fracture risk in men undergoing androgen deprivation. Androgens and androgen receptor (AR) actions are essential for bone development and homeostasis but their linkage to fracture repair remains unclear. Here we found that AR is highly expressed in the periosteum cells and is co-localized with a mesenchymal progenitor cell marker, paired-related homeobox protein 1 (Prrx1), during bone fracture repair. Mice lacking the AR gene in the periosteum expressing Prrx1-cre (AR-/Y;Prrx1::Cre) but not in the chondrocytes (AR-/Y;Col-2::Cre) exhibits reduced callus size and new bone volume. Gene expression data analysis revealed that the expression of several collagens, integrins and cell adhesion molecules were downregulated in periosteum-derived progenitor cells (PDCs) from AR-/Y;Prrx1::Cre mice. Mechanistically, androgens-AR signaling activates the AR/ARA55/FAK complex and induces the collagen-integrin α2ß1 gene expression that is required for promoting the AR-mediated PDCs migration. Using mouse cortical-defect and femoral graft transplantation models, we proved that elimination of AR in periosteum of host mice impairs fracture healing, regardless of AR existence of transplanted donor graft. While testosterone implanted scaffolds failed to complete callus bridging across the fracture gap in AR-/Y;Prrx1::Cre mice, cell-based transplantation using DPCs re-expressing AR could lead to rescue bone repair. In conclusion, targeting androgen/AR axis in the periosteum may provide a novel therapy approach to improve fracture healing.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Receptors, Androgen , Androgen Antagonists/pharmacology , Androgens/pharmacology , Animals , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Humans , Male , Mice , Periosteum/metabolism , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Testosterone
15.
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) ; 27(2): 69, 2022 02 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35227012

ABSTRACT

Periosteum is essential for bone regeneration and damage repair in mammals. Most species of deer family (Cervidae) develop two kinds of special periosteum, antler periosteum and pedicle periosteum, both supporting the complete regeneration of antler. Antler is the bone organ with the fastest growth rate in mammals. Along with the fast growth of antler, its external tissues such as blood vessels, nerves and the covering skin also grow rapidly. Currently, it is still unclear whether antler periosteum contributes to the fast growth of antler and how. It is also unclear why the regenerative capacity of antler periosteum is weaker than that of pedicle periosteum. In this study, the in vitro culture system for antler periosteal cells (AnPC) was constructed for the first time using the mid-beam antler periostea during antler fast-growth period. According to our results, the cultured AnPC expressed classical MSC markers, consistent with the pedicle periosteal stem cells (PPSC). However, the fluorescence intensities of the MSC markers on AnPC were significantly weaker than those on PPSC. In addition, AnPC showed much lower proliferation rates than PPSC. The proliferation rates of the AnPC also gradually decreased after successive passages, while the proliferation rates of the pedicle periosteal stem cells remained unchanged. These findings may partially explain the weaker regenerative capacity of antler periosteum. Further comparative global gene analysis revealed clearly the different gene expressed patterns between AnPC and PPSC. AnPC may mainly function on promoting angiogenesis, nerve growth and intramembrane bone formation during antler regeneration, whereas PPSC may primarily be involved in androgen signaling receptor pathway and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and function on maintaining stem cell renewal.


Subject(s)
Antlers , Deer , Animals , Antlers/physiology , Biomarkers/metabolism , Deer/physiology , Periosteum/metabolism , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases , Stem Cells/metabolism
16.
Adv Sci (Weinh) ; 9(3): e2103343, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34854257

ABSTRACT

Mechanical force regulates bone density, modeling, and homeostasis. Substantial periosteal bone formation is generated by external mechanical stimuli, yet its mechanism is poorly understood. Here, it is shown that myeloid-lineage cells differentiate into subgroups and regulate periosteal bone formation in response to mechanical loading. Mechanical loading on tibiae significantly increases the number of periosteal myeloid-lineage cells and the levels of active transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß), resulting in cortical bone formation. Knockout of Tgfb1 in myeloid-lineage cells attenuates mechanical loading-induced periosteal bone formation in mice. Moreover, CD68+ F4/80+ macrophages, a subtype of myeloid-lineage cells, express and activate TGF-ß1 for recruitment of osteoprogenitors. Particularly, mechanical loading induces the differentiation of periosteal CD68+ F4/80- myeloid-lineage cells to the CD68+ F4/80+ macrophages via signaling of piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 1 (Piezo1) for TGF-ß1 secretion. Importantly, CD68+ F4/80+ macrophages activate TGF-ß1 by expression and secretion of thrombospondin-1 (Thbs1). Administration of Thbs1 inhibitor significantly impairs loading-induced TGF-ß activation and recruitment of osteoprogenitors in the periosteum. The results suggest that periosteal myeloid-lineage cells respond to mechanical forces and consequently produce and activate TGF-ß1 for periosteal bone formation.


Subject(s)
Antigens, CD/metabolism , Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic/metabolism , B7-1 Antigen/metabolism , Cortical Bone/metabolism , Osteogenesis/physiology , Transforming Growth Factor beta1/metabolism , Animals , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Models, Animal , Periosteum/metabolism , Signal Transduction/physiology
17.
Cell Rep ; 36(2): 109380, 2021 07 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34260913

ABSTRACT

Mechanical stimuli including loading after birth promote bone growth. However, little is known about how mechanical force triggers biochemical signals to regulate bone growth. Here, we identified a periosteal-osteoblast-derived secretory peptide, Osteocrin (OSTN), as a mechanotransducer involved in load-induced long bone growth. OSTN produced by periosteal osteoblasts regulates growth plate growth by enhancing C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP)-dependent proliferation and maturation of chondrocytes, leading to elongation of long bones. Additionally, OSTN cooperates with CNP to regulate bone formation. CNP stimulates osteogenic differentiation of periosteal osteoprogenitors to induce bone formation. OSTN binds to natriuretic peptide receptor 3 (NPR3) in periosteal osteoprogenitors, thereby preventing NPR3-mediated clearance of CNP and consequently facilitating CNP-signal-mediated bone growth. Importantly, physiological loading induces Ostn expression in periosteal osteoblasts by suppressing Forkhead box protein O1 (FoxO1) transcription factor. Thus, this study reveals a crucial role of OSTN as a mechanotransducer converting mechanical loading to CNP-dependent bone formation.


Subject(s)
Bone Development , Muscle Proteins/metabolism , Periosteum/growth & development , Periosteum/metabolism , Stress, Mechanical , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Mice, Knockout , Natriuretic Peptide, C-Type/metabolism , Osteoblasts/metabolism , Osteogenesis , Receptors, Atrial Natriuretic Factor/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Weight-Bearing
18.
Tissue Cell ; 71: 101515, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33657504

ABSTRACT

Small bone defects can heal spontaneously through the bone modeling process due to their physiological environmental conditions. The bone modeling cycle preserves the reliability of the skeleton through the well-adjusted activities of its fundamental cell. Stem cells are a source of pluripotent cells with a capacity to differentiate into any tissue in the existence of a suitable medium. The concept of bone engineering is based on stem cells that can differentiate into bone cells. Mesenchymal stromal cells have been evaluated in bone tissue engineering due to their capacity to differentiate in osteoblasts. They can be isolated from bone marrow and from several adults oral and dental tissues such as permanent or deciduous teeth dental pulp, periodontal ligament, apical dental papilla, dental follicle precursor cells usually isolated from the follicle surrounding the third molar, gingival tissue, periosteum-derived cells, dental alveolar socket, and maxillary sinus Schneiderian membrane-derived cells. Therefore, a suitable animal model is a crucial step, as preclinical trials, to study the outcomes of mesenchymal cells on the healing of bone defects. We will discuss, through this paper, the use of mesenchymal stem cells obtained from several oral tissues mixed with different types of scaffolds tested in different animal models for bone tissue engineering. We will explore and link the comparisons between human and animal models and emphasized the factors that we need to take into consideration when choosing animals. The pig is considered as the animal of choice when testing large size and multiple defects for bone tissue engineering.


Subject(s)
Bone Regeneration , Bone and Bones/metabolism , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Osteogenesis , Tissue Engineering , Dental Pulp/metabolism , Gingiva/metabolism , Humans , Periodontal Ligament/metabolism , Periosteum/metabolism
19.
Biomater Sci ; 9(6): 2090-2102, 2021 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33475652

ABSTRACT

Deferoxamine (DFO), an iron chelator regarded as a hypoxic analogue, has been reported to be involved in angiogenesis and osteogenic differentiation. In this study, DFO was loaded into nanospheres, Then, DFO-loaded NPs and free DFO were co-encapsulated in nanofibers through coaxial electrospinning and its effects on cell viability, migration, and osteogenic differentiation, and the potential mechanisms were investigated. The results suggested that DFO maintained cell viability and promoted the migration of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and MC3T3-E1 cells. ALP activity, calcium deposition, and expression of osteogenesis-related markers, including collagen, osteocalcin, and osteopontin, were all increased with DFO. Moreover, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, transforming growth factor-ß, and Smad2 were upregulated with DFO, which indicated activation of the TGF-ß1/Smad2 signalling pathway. This may contribute to osteogenic differentiation of cells.


Subject(s)
Osteogenesis , Periosteum , Cell Differentiation , Cells, Cultured , Humans , Periosteum/metabolism , Smad2 Protein , Transforming Growth Factor beta/metabolism , Transforming Growth Factor beta1
20.
Cell Prolif ; 53(11): e12904, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32997394

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Most bone fracture heals through enchondral bone formation that relies on the involvement of periosteal progenitor cells. However, the identity of periosteal progenitor cells and the regulatory mechanism of their proliferation and differentiation remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether Gli1-CreERT2 can identify a population of murine periosteal progenitor cells and the role of TGF-ß signalling in periosteal progenitor cells on fracture healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Double heterozygous Gli1-CreERT2 ;Rosa26-tdTomatoflox/wt mice were sacrificed at different time points for tracing the fate of Gli1+ cells in both intact and fracture bone. Gli1-CreERT2 -mediated Tgfbr2 knockout (Gli1-CreERT2 ;Tgfbr2flox/flox ) mice were subjected to fracture surgery. At 4, 7, 10, 14 and 21 days post-surgery, tibia samples were harvested for tissue analyses including µCT, histology, real-time PCR and immunofluorescence staining. RESULTS: Through cell lineage-tracing experiments, we have revealed that Gli1-CreER T2 can be used to identify a subpopulation of periosteal progenitor cells in vivo that persistently reside in periosteum and contribute to osteochondral elements during fracture repair. During the healing process, TGF-ß signalling is continually activated in the reparative Gli1+ periosteal cells. Conditional knockout of Tgfbr2 in these cells leads to a delayed and impaired enchondral bone formation, at least partially due to the reduced proliferation and chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation of Gli1+ periosteal cells. CONCLUSIONS: TGF-ß signalling plays an essential role on fracture repair via regulating enchondral bone formation process of Gli1+ periosteal cells.


Subject(s)
Fracture Healing , Osteogenesis , Periosteum/cytology , Smad2 Protein/metabolism , Transforming Growth Factor beta/metabolism , Zinc Finger Protein GLI1/metabolism , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Female , Male , Mice , Periosteum/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Stem Cells/cytology , Stem Cells/metabolism , Tibia/injuries , Tibia/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...