Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 177
Filter
1.
Muscle Nerve ; 69(5): 631-636, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38456323

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: While ultrasound assessment of cross-sectional area and echogenicity has gained popularity as a biomarker for various neuropathies, there is a scarcity of data regarding fascicle count and density in neuropathies or even healthy controls. The aim of this study was to determine whether fascicles within select lower limb nerves (common fibular, superficial fibular, and sural nerves) can be counted in healthy individuals using ultrahigh-frequency ultrasound (UHFUS). METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers underwent sonographic examination of the common fibular, superficial fibular, and sural nerves on each lower limb using UHFUS with a 48 MHz linear transducer. Fascicle counts and density in each examined nerve were determined by a single rater. RESULTS: The mean fascicle number for each of the measured nerves included the following: common fibular nerve 9.85 (SD 2.29), superficial fibular nerve 5.35 (SD 1.59), and sural nerve 6.73 (SD 1.91). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between cross-sectional area and fascicle count for all three nerves. In addition, there was a significant association seen in the common fibular nerve between fascicle density and height, weight, and body mass index. Age and sex did not predict fascicle count or density (all p > .13). DISCUSSION: UHFUS enabled the identification and counting of fascicles and fascicle density in the common fibular, superficial fibular, and sural nerves. Knowledge about normal values and normal peripheral nerve architecture is needed in order to further understand and identify pathological changes that may occur within each nerve in different disease states.


Subject(s)
Peripheral Nerves , Sural Nerve , Humans , Sural Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Sural Nerve/pathology , Ultrasonography , Peripheral Nerves/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Nerve/pathology , Lower Extremity
2.
JBJS Case Connect ; 13(4)2023 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38064579

ABSTRACT

CASE: A 28-year-old male patient who injured his ankle 2 years ago presented with unilateral ankle pain, tingling, and numbness for 1 year. Clinically, tenderness and positive Tinel sign were localized on anterior aspect of ankle. On exploration, deep peroneal nerve and mainly its articular branch were encased in fibrotic tissue. Decompression of both nerves resulted in symptomatic relief after surgery. CONCLUSION: High index of suspicion, a thorough medical history, meticulous clinical examination, complete knowledge of nerve anatomy, proper radiological studies, and careful surgical decompression are all necessary for the diagnosis and management of such atypical cases.


Subject(s)
Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome , Male , Humans , Adult , Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome/surgery , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Nerve/surgery , Ankle/diagnostic imaging , Ankle/surgery , Ankle Joint/surgery , Decompression, Surgical/methods
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37856702

ABSTRACT

Peripheral nerve injuries due to mass effect from bony lesions can occur when the nerve exists in an anatomically constrained location, such as the common peroneal nerve at the fibular head which passes into the tight fascia of the lateral leg compartment. We report a case of a pediatric patient who developed a common peroneal nerve palsy secondary to an osteochondroma of the fibular head and describe the clinical evaluation, radiographic findings, and surgical approach. Rapid diagnosis and nerve decompression after the onset of symptoms restored full motor function at the 8-month postoperative mark.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , Osteochondroma , Peroneal Neuropathies , Humans , Child , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Nerve/surgery , Peroneal Nerve/injuries , Fibula/diagnostic imaging , Fibula/surgery , Fibula/pathology , Peroneal Neuropathies/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Neuropathies/etiology , Peroneal Neuropathies/surgery , Osteochondroma/complications , Osteochondroma/diagnostic imaging , Osteochondroma/surgery , Paralysis/surgery , Paralysis/complications , Bone Neoplasms/complications , Bone Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Bone Neoplasms/surgery
6.
J Equine Vet Sci ; 126: 104299, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36990251

ABSTRACT

Techniques for local anesthesia of the tibial (TN) and superficial and deep fibular nerves (FNs) in horses are well established. Ultrasound-guided perineural blocks can identify the nerve location, reduce the anesthetic volume needed and avoid needle misplacement. The aim of this research was to compare the success of blind perineural injection technique (BLIND) to ultrasound-guided technique (USG). Fifteen equine cadaver hindlimbs were divided into two groups. Perineural injection of the TN and FNs was performed using a mixed solution of radiopaque contrast, saline and food dye. BLIND (n = 8) used 15 mL for the TN and 10 mL for each fibular nerve. USG (n = 7) used 3 mL for the TN and 1.5 mL for each fibular nerve. The limbs were radiographed immediately after injections and sectioned transversally to evaluate the diffusion and presence of the injectate adjacent to the TN and FNs. The presence of dye immediately adjacent to the nerves was considered a successful perineural injection. No statistically significant difference was observed between groups for success. Distal diffusion of injectate following perineural injection of the TN was significantly less for USG compared to BLIND. Proximal, distal and medial diffusion of injectate following perineural injection of FNs was significantly less for USG compared to BLIND. Low-volume USG results in less diffusion but similar success compared to BLIND leaving it up to veterinarian preference when selecting a technique.


Subject(s)
Horse Diseases , Peroneal Nerve , Horses , Animals , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , Injections/veterinary , Cadaver , Ultrasonography, Interventional/veterinary
7.
Muscle Nerve ; 67(6): 469-473, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36919940

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Lower limb sensory nerve action potentials are an important component of nerve conduction studies. Most testing of the sural and superficial fibular nerves involves antidromic techniques above the ankle, which result in a falsely unobtainable response in 2%-6% of healthy people. Cadaver, surgical, and more recent ultrasound series suggest this may relate to the site of fascia penetration of the nerve, and it is hypothesized that a modified technique may be more likely to produce reliable responses and reduce false-negative errors. METHODS: This article evaluates a variety of recording distances for both nerves in 100 healthy controls, including varying recording electrode positions and techniques, to provide the optimal electrodiagnostic information in healthy control subjects. RESULTS: Shorter stimulation distances produce higher-amplitude responses but become confounded by increasing stimulation artifact at very short distances, with the best balance found at around 10 cm. In both sural and superficial fibular nerves, amplitude increases by approximately 10%/cm compared with the standard 14 cm distance. The Daube superficial fibular technique produced a higher amplitude than the Izzo Intermediate technique (by 22.46%, p < .001). The calculated upper limit of normal for side-to-side variation in amplitude was around 50% in the sural nerve but over 70% in the superficial fibular nerve. DISCUSSION: It is proposed that the 10 cm recording distance for both nerves is optimal, with minimal false-negatives and a higher amplitude elicited than with existing techniques.


Subject(s)
Neural Conduction , Sural Nerve , Humans , Action Potentials/physiology , Neural Conduction/physiology , Sural Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Sural Nerve/physiology , Evoked Potentials , Ankle , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Nerve/physiology
8.
Skeletal Radiol ; 52(4): 751-761, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36318320

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine if MR neurography of the common peroneal nerve (CPN) predicts a residual motor deficit at 12-month clinical follow-up in patients presenting with foot drop. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search for MR neurography cases evaluating the CPN at the knee was performed. Patients were included if they had electrodiagnostic testing (EDX) within 3 months of imaging, ankle and/or forefoot dorsiflexion weakness at presentation, and at least 12-month follow-up. Two radiologists individually evaluated nerve size (enlarged/normal), nerve signal (T2 hyperintense/normal), muscle signal (T2 hyperintense/normal), muscle bulk (normal/Goutallier 1/Goutallier > 1), and nerve and muscle enhancement. Discrepancies were resolved via consensus review. Multivariable logistical regression was used to evaluate for association between each imaging finding and a residual motor deficit at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-three 3 T MRIs in 22 patients (1 bilateral, mean age 52 years, 16 male) met inclusion criteria. Eighteen cases demonstrated common peroneal neuropathy on EDX, and median duration of symptoms was 5 months. Six cases demonstrated a residual motor deficit at 12-month follow-up. Fourteen cases underwent CPN decompression (1 bilateral) within 1 year of presentation. Three cases demonstrated Goutallier > 1 anterior compartment muscle bulk. Multivariable logistical regression did not show a statistically significant association between any of the imaging findings and a residual motor deficit at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: MR neurography did not predict a residual motor deficit at 12-month follow-up in patients presenting with foot drop, though few patients demonstrated muscle atrophy in this study.


Subject(s)
Peroneal Neuropathies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Peroneal Neuropathies/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Neuropathies/surgery , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Muscle Weakness/diagnostic imaging
9.
World Neurosurg ; 166: e968-e979, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35953037

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Advancements in imaging and an understanding of the pathomechanism for intraneural ganglion cyst formation have led to increased awareness and recognition of this lesion. However, the precise role of imaging has been advocated for but not formally evaluated. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the world literature to study the frequency of imaging used to diagnose intraneural ganglion cysts at different sites and compared trends in identifying joint connections. RESULTS: We identified 941 cases of intraneural ganglion cysts, of which 673 had published imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, n = 527) and ultrasonography (US, n = 123) were the most commonly reported. They occurred most frequently in the common peroneal nerve (n = 570), followed by the ulnar nerve at the elbow (n = 88), and the tibial nerve at the ankle (n = 58). A joint connection was identified in 375 cases (48%), with 62% of MRIs showing a joint connection, followed by 16% on US, and 6% on computed tomography (CT). MRI was statistically more likely to identify a joint connection than was US (P < 0.01). In the last decade, joint connections have been identified with increasing frequency using preoperative imaging, with up to 75% of cases reporting joint connections. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative imaging plays an important role in establishing the diagnosis of intraneural ganglion cyst as well as treatment planning. Imaging has proved superior to the sole reliance of operative exposure to identify a joint connection, which is necessary to treat the underlying disease. Failure to identify cyst connections on imaging can result in an inability to truly address the underlying pathoanatomy at the time of definitive surgery, leading to a risk for clinical recurrence. Therefore, management should be guided by an intersection between new knowledge presented in the literature, clinical expertise, and surgeon experience.


Subject(s)
Ganglion Cysts , Ganglia/pathology , Ganglion Cysts/diagnostic imaging , Ganglion Cysts/surgery , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Nerve/pathology , Tibial Nerve/pathology
10.
Neuromodulation ; 25(4): 504-510, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35667768

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain affects 7%-10% of Americans, occurs more frequently and severely in females, and available treatments have been shown to have less efficacy in female patients. Preclinical models addressing sex-specific treatment differences in the treatment of chronic pain have been limited. Here we examine the sex-specific effects of low intensity focused ultrasound (liFUS) in a modified sciatic nerve injury (SNI) model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified SNI performed by ligating the common peroneal nerve (CPN) was used to measure sensory, behavioral pain responses, and nerve conduction studies in female and male rats, following liFUS of the L5 dorsal root ganglion. RESULTS: Using the same dose of liFUS in females and males of the same weight, CPN latency immediately after treatment was increased for 50 min in females compared to 25 min in males (p < 0.001). Improvements in mechanical pain thresholds after liFUS lasted significantly longer in females (seven days; p < 0.05) compared to males (three days; p < 0.05). In females, there was a significant improvement in depression-like behavior as a result of liFUS (N = 5; p < 0.01); however, because males never developed depression-like behavior there was no change after liFUS treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Neuromodulation with liFUS has a greater effect in female rats on CPN latency, mechanical allodynia duration, and depression-like behavior. In order to customize neuromodulatory techniques for different patient phenotypes, it is essential to understand how they may alter sex-specific pathophysiologies.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Neuralgia , Peripheral Nerve Injuries , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Humans , Hyperalgesia/etiology , Hyperalgesia/therapy , Male , Neuralgia/therapy , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/therapy , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Nerve/injuries , Rats
11.
Am J Sports Med ; 50(7): 1858-1866, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35532551

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lateral meniscal repair using an all-inside meniscal repair device involves a risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury. To our knowledge, there have been no previous studies evaluating the risk of injury with the knee in the standard operational figure-of-4 position with joint dilatation in arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair. PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the risk of peroneal nerve injury and establish the safe and danger zones in repairing the lateral meniscus through the anteromedial, anterolateral, or transpatellar portal in relation to the medial and lateral borders of the popliteal tendon (PT). STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Using axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of knees in the figure-of-4 position with joint fluid dilatation at the level of the lateral meniscus, we drew direct lines to simulate a straight all-inside meniscal repair device deployed from the anteromedial, anterolateral, and transpatellar portals to the medial and lateral borders of the PT. If the line passed through or touched the peroneal nerve, a risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury was noted, and measurements were made to determine the safe and danger zones for peroneal nerve injury in relation to the medial or lateral border of the PT. RESULTS: Axial MRI images of 29 adult patients were reviewed. Repairing the lateral meniscus through the anteromedial portal in relation to the lateral border of the PT and through the anterolateral portal in relation to the medial border of the PT had a 0% risk of peroneal nerve injury. The "safe zone" in relation to the medial border of the PT through the anterolateral portal was between the medial border of the PT and 9.62 ± 4.60 mm medially from the same border. CONCLUSION: It is safe to repair the body of the lateral meniscus through the anteromedial portal in the area lateral to the lateral border of the PT or through the anterolateral portal in the area medial to the medial border of the PT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There is a risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury during lateral meniscal repair. Thus, we recommend repairing the lateral meniscal tissue through the anteromedial portal in the area lateral to the lateral border of the PT and using the anterolateral portal in the area medial to the medial border of the PT, as neither of these approaches resulted in peroneal nerve injury. Additionally, the surgeon can decrease this risk by repairing the meniscal tissue using the all-inside meniscal device in the safe zone area.


Subject(s)
Peripheral Nerve Injuries , Tibial Meniscus Injuries , Adult , Arthroscopy/adverse effects , Arthroscopy/methods , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease/prevention & control , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/adverse effects , Menisci, Tibial/surgery , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Nerve/injuries , Tibial Meniscus Injuries/surgery
12.
Pain Manag ; 12(5): 579-586, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35416721

ABSTRACT

Aim: This case report presents the application of ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the superficial peroneal nerve to treat chronic refractory neuropathic pain, rated by the patient with an average intensity of 6/10 on the numerical rating scale. Materials & methods: Under ultrasound guidance, the nerve was identified compressed by a herniation of the peroneus brevis. An in-plane hydrodissection was performed using a solution of 10 ml of ropivacaine and methylprednisolone until the epineurium was entirely separated from the surrounding tissue. Results: At the 2-month follow-up, the patient reported a decrease of pain, which he rated a 2/10 on the numerical rating scale. At this point, night-time episodes of moderate pain persisted. The procedure was repeated and at the 6-month follow-up, the patient remained pain free. Conclusion: This case report suggests that consecutive ultrasound-guided hydrodissection techniques might be a valuable option in the treatment of superficial peroneal nerve entrapment neuropathy.


Peripheral neuropathic pain is a debilitating pain condition. Management can be challenging and clinicians often rely on oral medications and surgical options. This case report presents the treatment of a case of longstanding, moderate-to-severe superficial peroneal nerve entrapment neuropathy due to a grenade explosion, with consecutive nerve hydrodissection using a solution containing an anesthetic and a corticosteroid. Immediately after the second procedure and at the 6-month follow-up the patient reported near-total relief.


Subject(s)
Neuralgia , Veterans , Humans , Male , Neuralgia/surgery , Pain Measurement/methods , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods
13.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(11)2022 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35356920

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The aim of this work is to study the sonoelastographic features of the common fibular nerve in healthy adult subjects.This is an observational cross-sectional study. Shear wave elastography was used to evaluate the common fibular nerve. Crosssectional area and stiffness were measured in kilopascal (kPa) and meters/second (m/s).The study included 82 common fibular nerves in 41 healthy adult subjects. The mean cross-sectional area of the common fibular nerve at the fibular head was 8.7 mm2. Positive correlation was noted between stiffness measurements between short and long axes by both methods. The mean stiffness of the common fibular nerve in the short axis was 22.5 kPa, and in the long axis (LA) was 35.4 kPa. Positive correlation was noted between height and stiffness measured by both methods in both axes by kPa. In m/s, the mean stiffness of the common fibular in the short axis was 2.6 m/s, and while in the LA was 3.4 m/s. Height showed positive correlation with both axes for stiff measurements in m\s. Weight showed positive correlation with stiffness measurements by m/s in the LA.The results obtained in our study could be a reference point for evaluating stiffness of the common fibular nerve in research involving different pathologies.


Subject(s)
Elasticity Imaging Techniques , Peroneal Nerve , Adult , Body Height , Cross-Sectional Studies , Elasticity Imaging Techniques/methods , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging
14.
J Knee Surg ; 35(8): 821-827, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33111269

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to assess the distance and angular location of the common peroneal nerve (CPN) on axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the valgus knees and compare the measurements with those obtained from the control group. We compared the location of the CPN according to the type of alignment by performing a subgroup analysis. From January 2009 to December 2019, we identified 41 knees with preoperative MRI in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for valgus deformity (valgus group). We performed one-to-two matched-pair analysis to a cohort of patients who underwent MRI but were not candidates for TKA (control group), according to sex and age. The valgus group was classified according to the grading system reported by Ranawat et al, and the control group was also subdivided according to the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle obtained from lower extremity scanography: neutral (-3 to +3 degrees from the neutral mechanical axis), valgus (> +3 degrees), and varus alignment (< -3 degrees). Distance between the CPN and posterolateral cortex of the tibia at the knee joint (distance J) and tibial cut level (distance C) were measured. Angle of the CPN from the central anteroposterior axis of the tibia (angle α) was measured. We compared the measurements between the groups. Distance J was significantly closer in the valgus group (p < 0.001), whereas angle α was significantly smaller in the valgus group (p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were found in the subgroup analysis. Moreover, a significant correlation was found between distance J and the HKA angle (p < 0.001). The location of the CPN in the valgus knees was closer to the posterolateral cortex of the tibia at the joint level and showed a smaller angle than that in the other aligned knees. We recommend that lateral soft tissue release for valgus knees should not be performed at the joint line. The results of this study suggest that this would be less safe than a release performed at the level of the proximal tibial bone resection.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Knee , Peroneal Nerve , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Matched-Pair Analysis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Tibia/surgery
15.
Turk Neurosurg ; 31(6): 992-995, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34664701

ABSTRACT

This article presents the case of a 32-year-old female patient with schwannoma. The patient had swelling on the anterior aspect of her right foot for 1 year with increasing pain over the past 2 months. Moreover, a positive Tinel sign was present over the swelling. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a large schwannoma mass in the deep peroneal nerve. Consequently, the patient?s large schwannoma was completely excised along with its capsule. Schwannomas are benign tumors of the peripheral nerves that rarely exhibit malignant transformation. Treatment is considered to be curative if complete resection is achieved.


Subject(s)
Neurilemmoma , Peroneal Nerve , Adult , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neurilemmoma/diagnostic imaging , Neurilemmoma/surgery , Pain , Peripheral Nerves , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Nerve/surgery
16.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 210: 106992, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34700275

ABSTRACT

Neurolymphomatosis is a rare complication of systemic lymphomas, and is classically related to hematogenous spread or intraneural spread of tumor cells from the leptomeninges. Here we report a case of neurolymphomatosis related to direct epineural invasion of the superficial peroneal nerve from subcutaneous localization of B-cell lymphoma. Nerve biopsy revealed striking histological features suggestive of contiguous infiltration of the superficial peroneal nerve by subcutaneous lymphoma. We think this case report sheds new light on neurolymphomatosis pathophysiology with an unreported mechanism in B-cell lymphoma. It also points out that the clinical spectrum in neurolymphomatosis is really variable, pure sensory mononeuritis being a rare presentation. Finally, our case is also strongly illustrative of the contribution of early nerve ultrasonography in the patient diagnosis and in guidance of the nerve biopsy.


Subject(s)
Lymphoma, B-Cell/diagnostic imaging , Neurolymphomatosis/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Nerves/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Lymphoma, B-Cell/complications , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neurolymphomatosis/etiology , Peripheral Nerves/pathology , Peroneal Nerve/pathology
17.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 209: 106915, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34500339

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Intraneural ganglia are benign fluid-filled cysts contained within the subepineurial space of peripheral nerves. The common peroneal nerve at the fibular neck is by far the most frequently involved, although other nerves can be affected as well. Although the differential diagnosis of foot drop in adults and children show some differences, clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, treatment and follow-up of intraneural ganglia are quite similar in both groups. The primary objective was to create an overview of intraneural ganglia in children, with an emphasis on diagnostic workup and potential pitfalls during neurosurgical intervention, based on all available literature concerning this topic and own center experiences. As a secondary objective, we tried to raise the awareness concerning this unique cause of foot drop in childhood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a review of the literature, in which children who developed foot drop secondary to an intraneural ganglion cyst of the common peroneal nerve were examined. A total of eleven articles obtained from MEDLINE were included. Search terms included: "pediatric", "children", "child", "intraneural ganglia", "intraneural ganglion cysts", "foot drop", "peroneal nerve" and "fibular nerve". Additional studies were identified by checking reference lists. Furthermore, we present the case of a 12-year old girl with foot drop caused by an intraneural ganglion cyst. She underwent cyst decompression with evacuation of intraneural cyst fluid and articular branch disconnection. PRISMA and CARE statement guidelines were followed. RESULTS: We hypothesize that minor injury caused a breach in the joint capsule, resulting in synovial fluid egression along the articular nerve branch, corroborating the unifying articular theory and emphasizing the need for ligation of said branch. Foot drop is a predominant characteristic, explained by the proximity of the anterior tibial muscle motor branch near the articular branch nerve. In children, satisfactory motor recovery after surgical decompression is to be expected. CONCLUSION: Sudden or progressive foot drop in children warrants an exhaustive neurophysiological and radiological workup. The management of intraneural ganglia is specific, consisting of nerve decompression, articular branch ligation and joint disarticulation, if deemed necessary. Our surgical results support the unifying articular theory and emphasize the importance of ligation and transection of the articular branch nerve, distally from the anterior tibial muscle branch, in order to prevent intraneural ganglia recurrence. This well-documented case adds depth to the current literature on this sparsely reported entity.


Subject(s)
Ganglion Cysts/complications , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Neuropathies/etiology , Child , Female , Ganglion Cysts/diagnostic imaging , Ganglion Cysts/surgery , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Peroneal Nerve/surgery , Peroneal Neuropathies/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Neuropathies/surgery
19.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 74(10): 2776-2820, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34229957

ABSTRACT

Common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury is a recognised complication of traumatic knee dislocation with a direct association between the degree of ligamentous injury and the degree of CPN injury. It is essential explore and repair these injuries in good time to reduce morbidity. Often exploration only involves the portion of this nerve associated with the joint as it courses around the fibular head. However, a recent case highlighted the importance of proximal exploration to its branching point from the sciatic nerve, a known point of fragility, even if other defects have been identified.


Subject(s)
Knee Dislocation/complications , Knee Injuries/complications , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Peripheral Nerve Injuries , Peroneal Nerve , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Adult , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Bicycling , Humans , Knee Injuries/diagnosis , Knee Injuries/surgery , Male , Patient Care Team , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/etiology , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/physiopathology , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/surgery , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Peroneal Nerve/injuries , Peroneal Nerve/surgery , Time-to-Treatment , Trauma Severity Indices , Treatment Outcome
20.
Skeletal Radiol ; 50(12): 2483-2494, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021773

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of intravenous (IV) contrast on sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) neurography of the knee with attention to the common peroneal nerve (CPN) in identifying nerve lesions and active muscle denervation changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search for contrast-enhanced MR neurography cases evaluating the CPN at the knee was performed. Patients with electrodiagnostic testing (EDX) within 3 months of imaging were included and those with relevant prior surgery were excluded. Two radiologists independently reviewed non-contrast sequences and then 4 weeks later evaluated non-contrast and contrast sequences. McNemar's tests were performed to detect a difference between non-contrast only and combined non-contrast and contrast sequences in identifying nerve lesions and active muscle denervation changes using EDX as the reference standard. RESULTS: Forty-four exams in 42 patients (2 bilateral) were included. Twenty-eight cases had common peroneal neuropathy and 29, 21, and 9 cases had active denervation changes in the anterior, lateral, and posterior compartment/proximal muscles respectively on EDX. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of non-contrast versus combined non-contrast and contrast sequences for common peroneal neuropathy were 50.0%, 56.2%, and 52.3% versus 50.0%, 56.2%, and 52.3% for reader 1 and 57.1%, 50.0%, and 54.5% versus 64.3%, 56.2%, and 61.4% for reader 2. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of non-contrast and combined non-contrast and contrast sequences in identifying active denervation changes for anterior, lateral, and posterior compartment muscles were not significantly different. McNemar's tests were all negative. CONCLUSION: IV contrast does not improve the ability of MR neurography to detect CPN lesions or active muscle denervation changes.


Subject(s)
Muscle Denervation , Peroneal Nerve , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Peroneal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...