ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Canadians continue to report challenges accessing primary care. Practice choices made by primary care providers shape services available to Canadians. Although there is literature observing family medicine practice trends, there is less clarity on the reasoning underlying primary care providers' practice intentions. Advice offered by residents and early-career family physicians may reveal challenges they have experienced, how they have adapted to them, and strategies for new residents. In this paper, we examine advice family medicine residents and early-career family physicians would give to new family medicine residents. METHODS: Sixty early-career family physicians and thirty residents were interviewed as part of a mixed-methods study of practice patterns of family medicine providers in Canada. During qualitative interviews, participants were asked, "what advice would you give [a new family medicine resident] about planning their career as a family physician?" We inductively analyzed responses to this question. RESULTS: Advice consisted of understanding the current climate of family medicine (need for specialization, business management burden, physician burnout) and revealed reasons behind said challenges (lack of support for comprehensive clinic care, practical limitations of different practice models, and how payment models influence work-life balance). Subtheme analyses showed early-career family physicians being more vocal on understanding practical aspects of the field including practice logistics and achieving job security. CONCLUSION: Most advice mirrored current changes and challenges as well as revealing strategies on how primary care providers are handling the realities of practicing family medicine. Multi-modal systemic interventions may be needed to support family physicians throughout the changing reality of family medicine and ensure family medicine is an appealing specialty.
Subject(s)
Career Choice , Family Practice , Internship and Residency , Physicians, Family , Qualitative Research , Humans , Family Practice/education , Canada , Physicians, Family/psychology , Male , Female , Adult , Interviews as Topic , Work-Life Balance , Attitude of Health PersonnelABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A strong Primary Care has beneficial health effects. Its more beneficial attribute is longitudinality, which requires job stability in order to occur. In addition, Primary Care is facing a crisis due to the number of retirements it expects. The permanence of young professionals in Primary Care could contribute to improve longitudinality and the generational turnover of professionals. Therefore, this study explored the reasons that influence the abandonment of Family Medicine among young family physicians. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive-interpretative study was carried out in Granada and Madrid in 2022. By means of purposive snowball sampling, young family physicians who had left their job were recruited, with whom in-depth interviews and a triangular group were carried out. The information was coded inductively and analyzed according to the thematic content analysis method. RESULTS: Young family physicians left Family Medicine due to the frustration of not being able to practice as they would like to, job dissatisfaction and a pessimistic view of their future as workers. The decision to leave by these young professionals had been favored by the worsening of working conditions after the pandemic and by the values they have regarding work. CONCLUSIONS: The decision of young family physicians to leave the practice of Family Medicine is complex. To contribute to their permanence in Primary Care, it's necessary to improve their working conditions and increase the prestige of Family Medicine.
OBJECTIVE: Una Atención Primaria fuerte tiene efectos beneficiosos para la salud. El atributo de la misma con mayores beneficios es la longitudinalidad, que requiere de estabilidad laboral para poder producirse. Además, la Atención Primaria se enfrenta a una crisis por el número de jubilaciones que espera. Conseguir la permanencia de los profesionales jóvenes en Atención Primaria podría contribuir a mejorar la longitudinalidad y al recambio generacional de los profesionales. Por ello, en este estudio se exploraron los motivos que influyen en el abandono de la Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria entre jóvenes médicos y médicas de familia. METHODS: Se realizó un estudio cualitativo descriptivo-interpretativo en Granada y Madrid durante 2022. Mediante un muestreo intencionado por bola de nieve se reclutaron jóvenes médicos y médicas de familia que habían abandonado su trabajo, a los que se realizaron entrevistas en profundidad, además de un grupo triangular. La información se codificó de forma inductiva y se analizó según el método de análisis de contenido temático. RESULTS: Los jóvenes médicos y médicas de familia abandonaban la Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria por la frustración de no poder ejercer como les gustaría, por insatisfacción laboral y por una visión pesimista de su futuro como trabajadores/as. La decisión de abandonar de estos jóvenes profesionales se vio favorecido por el empeoramiento de las condiciones laborales tras la pandemia y sus valores respecto al trabajo. CONCLUSIONS: La decisión de jóvenes médicos y médicas de familia de abandonar la Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria es compleja. Para contribuir a su permanencia es necesario mejorar sus condiciones laborales y represtigiar la especialidad.
Subject(s)
Family Practice , Job Satisfaction , Physicians, Family , Qualitative Research , Humans , Male , Female , Physicians, Family/psychology , Adult , Community Medicine , Spain , Attitude of Health Personnel , Personnel Turnover/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The role of rural family physicians continues to evolve to accommodate the comprehensive care needs of aging societies. For older individuals in rural areas, rehabilitation is vital to ensure that they can continue to perform activities of daily living. In this population, a smooth discharge following periods of hospitalization is essential and requires management of multimorbidity, and rehabilitation therapists may require support from family physicians to achieve optimal outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate changes in the roles of rural family physicians in patient rehabilitation. METHODS: An ethnographic analysis was conducted with rural family physicians and rehabilitation therapists at a rural Japanese hospital. A constructivist grounded theory approach was applied as a qualitative research method. Data were collected from the participants via field notes and semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Using a grounded theory approach, the following three themes were developed regarding the establishment of effective interprofessional collaboration between family physicians and therapists in the rehabilitation of older patients in rural communities: 1) establishment of mutual understanding and the perception of psychological safety; 2) improvement of relationships between healthcare professionals and their patients; and 3) creation of new roles in rural family medicine to meet evolving needs. CONCLUSION: Ensuring continual dialogue between family medicine and rehabilitation departments helped to establish understanding, enhance knowledge, and heighten mutual respect among healthcare workers, making the work more enjoyable. Continuous collaboration between departments also improved relationships between professionals and their patients, establishing trust in collaborative treatment paradigms and supporting patient-centered approaches to family medicine. Within this framework, understanding the capabilities of family physicians can lead to the establishment of new roles for them in rural hospitals. Family medicine plays a vital role in geriatric care in community hospitals, especially in rural primary care settings. The role of family medicine in hospitals should be investigated in other settings to improve geriatric care and promote mutual learning and improvement among healthcare professionals.
Subject(s)
Grounded Theory , Hospitals, Community , Hospitals, Rural , Physicians, Family , Qualitative Research , Humans , Female , Male , Physicians, Family/psychology , Hospitals, Community/organization & administration , Hospitals, Rural/organization & administration , Japan , Cooperative Behavior , Physician's Role/psychology , Aged , Physical Therapists/psychology , Interprofessional Relations , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Medical professionals experienced high rates of burnout and moral distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Canada, burnout has been linked to a growing number of family physicians (FPs) leaving the workforce, increasing the number of patients without access to a regular doctor. This study explores the different factors that impacted FPs' experience with burnout and moral distress during the pandemic, with the goal of identifying system-based interventions aimed at supporting FP well-being and improving retention. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with FPs across four health regions in Canada. Participants were asked about the roles they assumed during different stages of the pandemic, and they were also encouraged to describe their well-being, including relevant supports and barriers. We used thematic analysis to examine themes relating to FP mental health and well-being. RESULTS: We interviewed 68 FPs across the four health regions. We identified two overarching themes related to moral distress and burnout: (1) inability to provide appropriate care, and (2) system-related stressors and buffers of burnout. FPs expressed concern about the quality of care their patients were able to receive during the pandemic, citing instances where pandemic restrictions limited their ability to access critical preventative and diagnostic services. Participants also described four factors that alleviated or exacerbated feelings of burnout, including: (1) workload, (2) payment model, (3) locum coverage, and (4) team and peer support. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic limited FPs' ability to provide quality care to patients, and contributed to increased moral distress and burnout. These findings highlight the importance of implementing system-wide interventions to improve FP well-being during public health emergencies. These could include the expansion of interprofessional team-based models of care, alternate remuneration models for primary care (ie, non-fee-for-service), organized locum programs, and the availability of short-term insurance programs to cover fixed practice operating costs.
Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , COVID-19 , Physicians, Family , Qualitative Research , Humans , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Canada , Female , Male , Physicians, Family/psychology , Adult , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , PandemicsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: General practitioners are trained to care for patients with a high level of responsibility and professional competency. However, there are few reports on the physical and mental health status of general practitioners (GPs) in China, particularly regarding help seeking and self-treatment. The primary aims of this study were to explore GPs' expectations of their own family doctors and their reflection on role positioning, and to explore the objective factors that hinder the system of family doctors. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of Chinese GPs. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings. RESULTS: More than half of the participants (57.20%) reported that their health was normal over the past year. A total of 420 participants (23.35%) reported having chronic diseases. For sleep duration, 1205 participants (66.98%) reported sleeping 6-8 h per day; 473 participants (26.29%) reported chronic insomnia. Two hundred thirty-one participants (12.84%) had possible depression. A total of 595 (33.07%) participants reported that they had contracted a fixed family doctor. In terms of preventing themselves from contracting for a family doctor, the following factors were identified: lack of sufficient time (54.81%), could solve obstacles themselves (50.97%), and embarrassment (24.24%). The proportion of the contract group (12.44%) taking personal relationship as a consideration was higher than that of the non-contract group (7.64%) (χ2 = 10.934 P = 0.01). Most participants (79.90%) in the non-signed group reported never having seen a family doctor. In terms of obstacles, more than half of the signed group thought that they could solve obstacles themselves, while the non-signed group (39.20%) was less confident in the ability of family doctors than the signed group (29.75%) (χ2 = 15.436, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: GPs work under great pressure and lack of self-care awareness, resulting in an increased prevalence of health conditions. Most GPs did not have a regular family doctor. Having a family doctor with a fixed contract is more conducive to the scientific management of their health and provides a reasonable solution to health problems. The main factors hindering GPs from choosing a family doctor were time consumption, abilities to solve obstacles themselves, and trust in the abilities of GPs. Therefore, simplifying the process of family doctor visits, Changing the GPs' medical cognition, and strengthening the policy of GP training would be conducive to promoting a family doctor system that enhances hierarchical diagnosis and treatment. International collaboration could integrate GP health support into global healthcare system.
Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Health Status , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , China , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , General Practitioners/psychology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Surveys and Questionnaires , Contract Services , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Physicians, Family/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite growing acceptance of LGBT + individuals, an underlying stigma persists even in healthcare, resulting in substandard care and worse healthcare outcomes for LGBT + individuals. OBJECTIVES: To examine and compare the experiences and expectations regarding primary healthcare among LGBT + individuals and general practitioners (GPs) in Slovenia. METHODS: We conducted an online national qualitative study using open-ended questions. To reach LGBT + population snowball method of recruitment was employed by sharing the questionnaire through LGBT + organisations, while GPs were invited by email of Association of family doctors in Slovenia. Anonymous data was collected from October to December 2021 and the questionnaires of 25 GPs and 90 LGBT + individuals of various ages, backgrounds, gender identities and sexual orientations were reviewed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Both LGBT + participants and GPs expressed a desire for equal treatment. However, while all GPs claimed to treat all patients equally, LGBT + participants reported more varied experiences. Specific knowledge, especially on LGBT + terminology and healthcare, was perceived as lacking among GPs, leading LGBT + individuals to seek advice from specialists or community counselling. Systemic barriers, including societal stigmatisation and limited formal education on LGBT + issues, were identified, highlighting the need for designated safe spaces and improved GP training. Safety emerged as a central theme, crucial for fostering trust and disclosure between patients and healthcare providers. CONCLUSION: The study underscores the significance of a sense of safety in the patient-doctor relationship and highlights the need for improved training and attitudes to provide inclusive and affirming healthcare for LGBT + individuals.
Primary care settings must prioritise creating safe and non-judgmental environments for better LGBT + healthcare.Addressing formal GP education on LGBT + terminology, identities, and healthcare needs is crucial to provide inclusive care.Overcoming systemic barriers, such as societal prejudice and homophobia, requires creating visible safe space signals in primary care settings.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Primary Health Care , Qualitative Research , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Humans , Slovenia , Female , Male , Sexual and Gender Minorities/psychology , Middle Aged , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , General Practitioners/psychology , Social Stigma , Aged , Physicians, Family/psychology , Physician-Patient RelationsABSTRACT
Demographic concordance between patients and clinicians has been associated with better outcomes. The current perinatal care workforce is not adequately diverse to allow for patient-clinician concordance. In this mixed-methods study, we aimed to understand family physicians' perception of the impact of patient-clinician concordance on perinatal care. The predominantly (91%) non-Hispanic White sample of 1,505 family physicians (FPs) perceived gender and language concordance to affect perinatal care more than racial or ethnic concordance. Religious concordance is not perceived to greatly affect perinatal care. Nearly half (721) of the respondents chose to leave a free-text comment on the impact of concordance on perinatal care. Four categories emerged (patients, physicians, the patient-physician relationship, and potential ways to mitigate the impact of discordance). Based on the perceptions of FPs experienced in perinatal care, intentionally supporting continuity of care between patients and clinicians may help to mitigate the negative impact of discordance on perinatal outcomes.
Subject(s)
Perinatal Care , Physician-Patient Relations , Physicians, Family , Humans , Perinatal Care/organization & administration , Perinatal Care/standards , Female , Male , Adult , Physicians, Family/psychology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Middle Aged , PregnancyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Occurrences of weight stigma have been documented in prenatal clinical settings from the perspective of pregnant patients, however little is known from the viewpoint of healthcare providers themselves. Reported experiences of weight stigma caused by maternal healthcare providers may be due to negative attitudes towards obesity in pregnancy and a lack of obesity specific education. The objective of this study was to assess weight-related attitudes and assumptions towards obesity in pregnancy among maternal healthcare providers in order to inform future interventions to mitigate weight stigma in prenatal clinical settings. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered online for maternal healthcare providers in Canada that assessed weight-related attitudes and assumptions towards lifestyle behaviours in pregnancy for patients who have obesity. Participants indicated their level of agreement on a 5-point likert scale, and mean scores were calculated with higher scores indicating poorer attitudes. Participants reported whether they had observed weight stigma occur in clinical settings. Finally, participants were asked whether or not they had received obesity-specific training, and attitude scores were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Seventy-two maternal healthcare providers (midwives, OBGYNs, residents, perinatal nurses, and family physicians) completed the survey, and 79.2% indicated that they had observed pregnant patients with obesity experience weight stigma in a clinical setting. Those who had obesity training perceived that their peers had poorer attitudes (3.7 ± 0.9) than those without training (3.1 ± 0.7; t(70) = 2.23, p = 0.029, Cohen's d = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Weight stigma occurs in prenatal clinical environments, and this was confirmed by maternal healthcare providers themselves. These findings support advocacy efforts to integrate weight stigma related content and mitigation strategies in medical education for health professionals, including maternal healthcare providers. Future work should include prospective examination of weight related attitudes among maternal healthcare providers and implications of obesity specific education, including strategies on mitigating weight stigma in the delivery of prenatal care.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Obesity , Social Stigma , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Canada , Obesity/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Midwifery , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Prenatal Care/psychology , Male , Health Personnel/psychology , Maternal Health Services , Middle Aged , Physicians, Family/psychologyABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the role of physicians in the intensive intervention and education regarding the smoking cessation of patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: A randomised prospective study was conducted in family physicians' clinics in which smokers of both sexes, aged 21-65 years, without cognitive impairments, and who were not addicted to psychoactive substances voluntarily participated. Four weeks preoperatively, 120 smokers were randomised into two equal groups; the intervention group (IG) underwent an intervention for the purpose of smoking cessation and the control group (CG) underwent no intervention. Biochemical tests were performed in order to determine the smoking status of the participants in the phase of randomisation, one week preoperatively, as well as 40, 120, and 180 days and 12 months postoperatively. The examinees of the IG talked to the physician five times and received 140 telephone messages, leaflets, and motivational letters along with the pharmacotherapy, while the participants in the CG received little or no advice on smoking cessation. Results: The results of this study confirmed a significant influence of the intervention and education on the smoking abstinence in the IG compared to the CG (p < 0.001). The smokers in the IG had 7.31 (95% CI: 2.32-23.04) times greater odds of abstinence upon the 12-month follow-up than the smokers in the CG. The smokers in the IG who did not stop smoking had a lower degree of dependence and smoked fewer cigarettes (p < 0.0001) compared to those in the CG, as well as a multiple times higher prevalence of short- and long-term abstinence. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the intensive intervention and education can motivate patients preparing for elective surgery to stop smoking in the short- and long term.
Subject(s)
Elective Surgical Procedures , Physicians, Family , Smoking Cessation , Humans , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Prospective Studies , Aged , Physicians, Family/psychology , Physician's Role , Lithuania , SmokingABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In the Medscape 2020 Compensation Report, family physicians ranked low for feeling fairly compensated, choosing their specialty again and choosing medicine again. However, the Medscape data may not represent military family physicians. METHODS: A large survey was emailed to 2,562 military family physicians via a military professional organization list-serve from February to April 2021. The inquiry included 6 statements pertaining to professional satisfaction. The main outcome measures were proportions of "agree" and "strongly agree." The proportions were compared to the Medscape Compensation Report 2020 and 2022. Statistical analysis was completed with a two-tailed Z-score for 2 populations. RESULTS: Sixty-one percent of military family physicians feel fairly compensated compared to 54% of civilian family physicians in 2020 and 55% in 2022 (P = .065, .119). Eighty-six percent of military family physicians would reselect medicine compared to 74% of civilian family physicians in 2020 and 73% in 2022 (P < .001 for both). Eighty percent of military family physicians would reselect their specialty again compared to 70% of civilians in 2020 and 68% in 2022 (P = .004, P = .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Military family physicians were more likely to choose medicine generally and family medicine specifically again. Military family physicians and civilian family physicians do not statistically differ in feeling fairly compensated. A strong majority of military family physicians are satisfied with their military-sponsored medical education.
Subject(s)
Job Satisfaction , Military Personnel , Physicians, Family , Humans , Physicians, Family/statistics & numerical data , Physicians, Family/psychology , Physicians, Family/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires , Male , Female , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Military Personnel/psychology , Adult , Middle Aged , Personal Satisfaction , United States , Military Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Military Medicine/methods , Military Medicine/standards , Military Medicine/trendsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Aim: To study and analyze the attitude of women of reproductive age to the integrated gynecological care provision by family physicians, their readiness to receive some gynecological services from family physicians, as well as to analyze the level of women's support and readiness for the integrated provision of gynecological care depending on age and level of education. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: For the survey, anonymous questionnaires containing questions on the attitude of women of reproductive age to the integrated provision of certain types of gynecological care by family physicians were developed. 181 women from the Kyiv region took part in the survey. RESULTS: Results: Support of more than 80% of respondents regarding the integrated gynecological care provision by family physicians received the following questions: counseling on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) (92,3%); counseling on family planning and prevention of unwanted pregnancy (83,4%); counseling on the use of various methods of contraception (82,3%); examination and palpation of mammary glands (80,1%); referral of women to a higher level of obstetric and gynecological care (if necessary (86,2%). CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The majority of respondents (67,4%) are ready or better ready than not ready to receive certain types of gynecological care services from family physicians. Almost the same percentage ratio (more than 60%) of women of each age group and all levels of education are ready or better ready than not ready to receive gynecological care services, which they supported, from family physicians.
Subject(s)
Gynecology , Humans , Female , Adult , Gynecology/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Ukraine , Middle Aged , Physicians, Family/statistics & numerical data , Physicians, Family/psychology , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Family Practice , AdolescentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, family physicians (FPs) served as the the initial point of contact for patients potentially infected with the virus, necessitating frequent updates to treatment protocols. However, practices also faced organizational challenges in providing care to other patients who also needed their medical attention. The pressure on FPs increased and affected their well-being. The international PRICOV-19 study, titled "Primary care in times of COVID-19 pandemic," investigated how FPs functioned during the COVID-19 pandemic. This article examines the correlation between various organizational and structural COVID-19-related variables and the well-being of FPs in Slovenia. METHODS: Between October 2020 and January 2021, we conducted an online cross-sectional survey. The questionnaire was distributed to 1040 Slovenian FPs and 218 family medicine (FM) trainees. Part of the questionnaire assessed the cooperation and well-being of FPs. The Mayo Clinic Well-being Index was used for the assessment. FP's well-being was also assessed descriptively by asking open-ended questions about maintaining mental health during the pandemic. Potential factors associated with FPs' well-being were identified using a multivariate linear regression method. RESULTS: The final sample comprised 191 participants (response rate 14.1%). The mean value ± standard deviation of the Mayo Well-being Index was 3.3 ± 2.6 points. The FPs with the poorest well-being had 5-15 years of work experience and worked in a practice where work could not be distributed in the absence of a co-worker without compromising the well-being of colleagues. Physical activity was identified as the most common method of maintaining mental health among FPs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study suggest that targeted interventions are needed to support FPs mid-career, increase resilience in practice, promote strong team dynamics, and prioritise physical activity in healthcare. Addressing these aspects can contribute to the well-being of individual FPs and the overall health of the healthcare workers.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physicians, Family , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Slovenia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Physicians, Family/psychology , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , SARS-CoV-2 , Mental Health , Pandemics , Primary Health CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Community Paramedicine (CP) is an emerging model of care addressing health problems through non-emergency services. Little evidence exists examining the integration of an app for improved patient, CP, and family physician (FP) communication. This study investigated FP perspectives on the impact of the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) program on providing patient care and the feasibility and value of a novel "My Care Plan App" (myCP app). METHODS: This retrospective mixed-methods study included an online survey and phone interviews to elucidate FPs ' perspectives on the CP@clinic program and the myCP app, respectively, between January 2021 and May 2021. FPs with patients in the CP@clinic program were recruited to participate. Survey responses were summarized using descriptive statistics, and audio recordings from the interviews thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight FPs completed the survey and 10 FPs completed the phone interviews. 60.5% and 52.6% of FPs reported that the CP@clinic program improved their ability to further screen and diagnose patients for hypertension, respectively (in addition to their regular screening practices). The themes that emerged in the phone interviews were grouped into three topics: app benefits, drawbacks, and integration within practice. Overall, FPs described the myCP app as user-friendly and useful to improve interprofessional communication with CPs. CONCLUSIONS: CP@clinic helped family physicians to screen and monitor chronic disease. The myCP app can impact health service delivery by closing the gap between primary, community, and emergency care through an eHealth information-sharing platform.
Subject(s)
Mobile Applications , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , Middle Aged , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Physicians, Family/psychology , Patient Care Planning/organization & administration , Adult , ParamedicineABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of persons with complex needs in Singapore is rising. Poor understanding of what constitutes complexity impedes the identification of care gaps and development of interventions to improve care for these individuals. We aim to identify the characteristics contributing to complexity in primary care, from the Family Physicians' (FP) perspectives. METHODS: Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted from January to September 2021 with experienced FPs across 14 study sites, employing a qualitative descriptive approach based on a complexity framework. Data were coded independently and categorised using thematic analysis by two independent investigators. RESULTS: Five FGDs were conducted with 18 FPs aged 32 to 57 years old working in different primary care settings, with a mean of 13.5 years of primary care experience. Participants emphasised the need for a unified definition of complexity. Complexity is characterised by the presence of issues spanning across two or more domains (medical, psychological, social or behavioural) that adversely impact medical care and outcomes. Persons with complex needs contrast with persons with medically difficult issues. Medical domain issues include the number of active medical problems, poor chronic disease control, treatment interactions, ill-defined symptoms, management of end-of-life conditions and functional impairment. Psychological domain issues include the presence of mental health conditions or cognitive impairment. Social domain issues include the lack of social support, competing social responsibilities and financial issues, while behavioural domain issues include a lack of trust in healthcare workers, fixed health beliefs and poor health literacy. CONCLUSION: Recognising the medical, psychological, social and behavioural factors that contribute to complexity aids in discerning the diverse needs of individuals with complex needs. This underscores the need for additional support in these pertinent areas.
Subject(s)
Focus Groups , Qualitative Research , Humans , Singapore/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Adult , Male , Female , Primary Health Care , Physicians, Family/psychology , Referral and Consultation , Attitude of Health Personnel , Physician-Patient RelationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Side effects can occur within hours to days of starting antidepressant medications, whereas full therapeutic benefit for mood typically takes up to four weeks. This mismatch between time to harm and lag to benefit often leads to premature discontinuation of antidepressants, a phenomenon that can be partially reversed through early doctor-patient communication and follow-up. We investigated the relationship between relational continuity of care - the number of years family physicians have cared for older adult patients - and early follow-up care for patients prescribed antidepressants. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on residents of Ontario, Canada aged 66 years or older who were dispensed their first antidepressant prescription through the provincial drug insurance program between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2019. The study utilized multivariable regression to estimate the relationship between relational continuity and 30-day follow-up with the prescribing family physician. Separate estimates were generated for older adults living in urban, non-major urban, and rural communities. RESULTS: The study found a small positive relationship between relational continuity of care and follow-up care by the prescribing family physician for patients dispensed a first antidepressant prescription (RRR = 1.005; 95% CI = 1.004, 1.006). The relationship was moderated by the patients' location of dwelling, where the effect was stronger for older adults residing in non-major urban (RRR = 1.009; 95% CI = 1.007, 1.012) and rural communities (RRR = 1.006; 95% CI = 1.002, 1.011). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not provide strong evidence of a relationship between relational continuity of care and higher quality management of antidepressant prescriptions. However, the relationship is slightly more pronounced in rural communities where access to continuous primary care and specialized mental health services is more limited. This may support the ongoing need for the recruitment and retention of primary care providers in rural communities.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents , Continuity of Patient Care , Humans , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Ontario , Physician-Patient Relations , Aged, 80 and over , Physicians, Family/psychology , Rural Population/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual care expanded rapidly at Michigan Medicine and other health systems. From family physicians' perspectives, this shift to virtual care has the potential to affect workflow, job satisfaction, and patient communication. As clinics reopened and care delivery models shifted to a combination of in-person and virtual care, the need to understand physician experiences with virtual care arose in order to improve both patient and provider experiences. This study investigated Michigan Medicine family medicine physicians' perceptions of virtual care through qualitative interviews to better understand how to improve the quality and effectiveness of virtual care for both patients and physicians. METHODS: We employed a qualitative descriptive design to examine physician perspectives through semistructured interviews. We coded and analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis, facilitated by MAXQDA (VERBI) software. RESULTS: The results of the analysis identified four major themes: (a) chief concerns that are appropriate for virtual evaluation, (b) physician perceptions of patient benefits, (c) focused but contextually enriched patient-physician communication, and (d) structural support needed for high-quality virtual care. CONCLUSIONS: These findings can help further direct the discussion of how to make use of resources to improve the quality and effectiveness of virtual care.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physicians, Family , Qualitative Research , Telemedicine , Humans , Physicians, Family/psychology , Michigan , Attitude of Health Personnel , Physician-Patient Relations , SARS-CoV-2 , Female , Male , Communication , Family Practice , Interviews as TopicABSTRACT
Family physicians (FPs) play an important but underappreciated role in the pathways to care for people with early psychosis. We conducted a mixed-methods study to describe the knowledge, attitudes, preferences, and needs of FPs towards the recognition and management of early psychosis. We sent a cross-sectional postal survey to a random sample of FPs in Ontario, Canada, and conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with twenty. FPs were generally aware of important early psychosis symptoms, however, there were some knowledge gaps. Among surveyed FPs, 25% were unsure of the availability of early psychosis intervention services in their region, and most (80%) would prefer to co-manage with specialists. In the qualitative interviews, FPs expressed varied comfort levels in recognizing psychosis, and that timely access to psychiatry was a main concern. Our findings suggest that FPs require better support in recognizing and managing early psychosis and facilitating connections with specialized care.
Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Physicians, Family , Primary Health Care , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ontario , Adult , Middle Aged , Physicians, Family/psychology , Qualitative Research , Attitude of Health Personnel , Surveys and Questionnaires , Early Medical Intervention , Interviews as TopicABSTRACT
Objetivo: la pandemia de la COVID-19 ha tenido un impacto psicológico en los profesionales sanitarios, a menudo manifestándose como burnout. Nuestro objetivo fue estimar la prevalencia del burnout en médicas y médicos de familia de Cataluña durante la pandemia e identificar factores sociodemográficos, laborales y de salud mental asociados.Métodos: estudio descriptivo transversal basado en una encuesta online realizada entre junio y julio de 2021. Se invitó a participar a los 4.700 socios y socias de la Societat Catalana de Medicina Familiar i Comunitària (CAMFiC) y se obtuvo un 11% de respuesta (n = 522).Medidas principales: Maslach Burnout Inventory, con tres dimensiones: agotamiento emocional, despersonalización y realización personal. Análisis bivariante y regresión logística múltiple (variable dependiente: nivel elevado de afectación para cada dimensión de burnout).Resultados: el 67,5% de encuestados presentó niveles altos de agotamiento emocional, el 42,7% de despersonalización y el 29,9% de niveles bajos de realización personal. La prevalencia de agotamiento emocional elevado fue mayor entre las mujeres y los expuestos a pacientes con COVID-19. La edad y años de antigüedad laboral se asoció de forma inversa a agotamiento emocional y despersonalización alta. En el análisis multivariante, la depresión se asoció a despersonalización alta y realización personal baja, la ansiedad a agotamiento emocional alto, y el estrés a las tres dimensiones.Conclusiones: después de 1 año de pandemia, existen niveles elevados de burnout en los médicos y médicas de familia, particularmente en la dimensión de agotamiento emocional. Son necesarias medidas organizativas para proteger la salud mental de las/los profesionales.(AU)
Aim: the COVID-19 pandemic has had a psychological impact on health professionals, often manifesting as burnout. Our purpose was to estimate the prevalence of burnout in family doctors in Catalonia during the pandemic and to identify associated sociodemographic, occupational and mental health factors.Methods: cross-sectional descriptive study based on an online survey conducted June-July 2021. The 4700 members of the Catalan Society of Family and Community Medicine were invited to take part. An 11% response was obtained (n=522).Primary endpoints: Maslach Burnout Inventory, with three dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal accomplishment. Bivariate analysis and multiple logistic regression (dependent variable: high level of affectation for each area dimension of burnout).Results: a total of 67.5%, 42.7% and 29.9% of respondents presented high levels of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and low sense of personal accomplishment, respectively. The prevalence of high emotional exhaustion was higher among women and those exposed to COVID-19 patients. Age and seniority were inversely associated with emotional exhaustion and high depersonalization. Multivariate analysis revealed that depression was associated with high depersonalization and low personal accomplishment, anxiety with high emotional exhaustion, and stress with all three areas.Conclusions: One year after onset of the pandemic, we detected high levels of burnout in family doctors, particularly in terms of emotional exhaustion. Organizational measures are necessary to protect the mental health of professionals.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Burnout, Psychological/psychology , Physicians, Family/psychology , /psychology , Pandemics , Mental Health , Primary Health Care , Spain , Prevalence , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Cross-Sectional Studies , /epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Family Practice , Burnout, ProfessionalABSTRACT
Estudo qualitativo com abordagem cartográfica que teve como objetivo compreender os efeitos que o vínculo e a responsabilização entre médicos de família e usuários produzem nos próprios médicos. Foram realizadas dez entrevistas abertas por meio de perguntas disparadoras com médicos de família e médicos residentes. A análise das entrevistas se deu sob o referencial da micropolítica e problematizou, com base nas experiências relatadas, a existência de um "território identitário médico", bem como as possibilidades de desconstituição desse território, sua desterritorialização no sentido de novas reterritorializações, a exemplo de afastar-se da onipotência/infalibilidade não para sofrer, mas para cuidar de si e do outro. Propõe-se que, nesse movimento de reconstrução do território identitário, tanto médico como usuário passem a transitar pela dimensão cuidadora do encontro, em que tecnologias leves podem ser operadas e novas possibilidades de configurações do cuidado acontecem. (AU)
Estudio cualitativo con abordaje cartográfico cuyo objetivo fue comprender los efectos que el vínculo y la toma de responsabilidad entre médicos de familia y usuarios producen en los propios médicos. Se realizaron diez entrevistas abiertas a partir de preguntas desencadenadoras con médicos de familia y médicos residentes. El análisis de las entrevistas se realizó con base en el referencial de la micropolítica y problematizó, a partir de las experiencias relatadas, la existencia de un "territorio de identidad médico", así como las posibilidades de desconstitución de este territorio, su desterritorialización en el sentido de nuevas reterritorializaciones, con el ejemplo de apartarse de la omnipotencia/infalibilidad no para sufrir, sino para cuidar de sí mismo y del otro. Se propone que, en ese movimiento de reconstrucción del territorio de identidad, tanto el médico como el usuario pasan a transitar por la dimensión cuidadora del encuentro, en donde tecnologías leves pueden operar y suceden nuevas posibilidades de configuraciones del cuidado. (AU)
The purpose of this qualitative research with a cartographic approach was to understand the effects that bonding and accountability between family physicians and users can produce on the physicians themselves. Ten open interviews were conducted based on triggering questions with family physicians and medical residents. The analysis of the interviews using the reference of the micropolitics was based on the experiences reported, and it was problematized the existence of a "medical identity territory", as well as the deconstruction of this territory, its "deterritorialization", leading to "reterritorializations", such as moving away from omnipotence / infallibility not to suffer, but to take care of oneself and others. It is proposed that in this movement, both physician and user start to move through the caregiving dimension of the encounter, where light technologies can be operated and new possibilities of configurations of care happens. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Physicians, Family/psychology , Patient-Centered Care , Family Practice , Object Attachment , Interviews as Topic , Continuity of Patient CareABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Conocer las percepciones y actitudes de profesionales médicos de familia (MF) ante consultas con gran componente emocional, denominadas inicialmente «consultas sagradas», e identificar ámbitos de mejora en su atención. DISEÑO: Metodología cualitativa con enfoque sociosubjetivo orientado a los servicios de salud. Estudio descriptivo-interpretativo. Emplazamiento: Centros de salud de Araba y Bizkaia. Participantes y/o contextos: Selección de 23 MF de 23 centros de salud urbanos y rurales. MÉTODO: Muestreo intencional buscando la diversidad discursiva. Datos generados en 2016 mediante 3 grupos de discusión y 3 entrevistas individuales grabadas y transcritas tras consentimiento informado. Presentación al Comité de Ética de Euskadi. Análisis temático con ayuda de mapas conceptuales y programa MaxQDA. Triangulación de los resultados entre investigadores y verificación por los participantes. Resultados y discusión: Los hallazgos se agruparon en áreas temáticas solapadas entre sí y relacionadas con el significado de dichas consultas, actitudes profesionales, contexto sanitario y pacientes. Se subraya la importancia de lo emocional en las consultas de atención primaria y su invisibilización, pero se cuestiona la idoneidad del término «sagradas». Su expresión se construye en la interrelación MF-paciente si el personal médico lo favorece y el paciente lo permite, discutiéndose las principales circunstancias que intervienen en una dimensión considerada clave de la integralidad de la atención. CONCLUSIONES: La atención a la dimensión emocional en la consulta presenta deficiencias que es necesario subsanar. Además de su reconocimiento y evaluación, sería preciso modificar los factores organizativos, formativos y profesionales que condicionan la implicación del personal MF en su buena asistencia
OBJECTIVE: To determine the perceptions and attitudes of the general practitioners (GP) towards consultations with great emotional component, initially called "sacred encounters", and to identify areas of improvement. DESIGN: A qualitative methodology based on a socio-subjective approach and focused on health services research. Descriptive-interpretative study. LOCATION: Health Centres of Alava and Biscay. Participants Selection of 23 GP from 23 urban and rural Health Centres. METHOD: Intentional sampling aimed at looking for discursive diversity. Data generated in 2016 by means of 3 discussion groups and 3 individual interviews recorded and transcribed after informed consent. Presentation to the ethics committee of the Basque Country. Thematic analysis with the aid of conceptual maps and MaxQDA program. Triangulation of the results between researchers and verification by the participants. Results and discusión: The findings were clustered into overlapping thematic areas related to the meaning of these encounters, attitudes of GP, health context, and patients. The importance of the emotions in primary care encounters and their invisibility is underlined, but the adequacy of the term "sacred" is questioned. This expression is built into the GP-patient relationship, if GP favours it and the patient also allows it, discussing the main circumstances that intervene in an essential dimension of integral care. CONCLUSIONS: The attention to the emotional dimension in the encounters has deficiencies that need to be corrected. In addition to its recognition and evaluation, it would be necessary to modify the organisational, training and professional factors that determine the involvement of the GPs in their good health care