Efficacy and safety of argatroban in the management of acute ischemic stroke: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of death and disability. AIS is caused by an embolus or thrombus that restricts blood flow to the brain tissue. Despite intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy, a substantial number of patients do not achieve effective reperfusion. Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, can potentially improve neurological outcomes in AIS patients. However, there are conflicting results in the medical literature regarding the efficacy and safety of argatroban in this context. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of argatroban as monotherapy or adjunct therapy for acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Five major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety of using argatroban alone or in combination with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-TPA) in the management protocol of the AIS. We used Review Manager Software (RevMan 5.4.1) for data analysis. RESULTS: We included 1393 patients from eight RCTs (of them, 726 were treated with argatroban alone or combined with r-TPA, while 667 received the placebo, standard therapy (standard treatments based on current guidelines including antihypertensive, antiplatelet agents, and statins) or endovascular r-TPA). Neither argatroban vs control nor argatroban with r-TPA vs r-TPA showed significant difference regarding the activity in daily living; (SMD= 1.69, 95% CI [-0.23, 3.61]; p = 0.09), (SMD= 0.99, 95% CI [-0.88, 2.86]; p = 0.30), respectively. Also, there was no significant difference in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at seven days, the number of patients achieving modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1 or 0-2 at 90 days (p > 0.05). Argatroban did not significantly increase the risk of adverse events or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or major systemic bleeding compared to control or r-TPA (p > 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Argatroban does not demonstrate superior efficacy compared to placebo or standard therapy in terms of ADL, NIHSS and mRS outcomes. Importantly, argatroban does not significantly increase the incidence of adverse events, including symptomatic ICH and systemic bleeding.

Argatroban in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With Early Neurological Deterioration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The effect of argatroban in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and early neurological deterioration (END) is unknown. Objective: To assess the efficacy of argatroban for END in AIS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label, blinded-end point, randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 4, 2020, through July 31, 2022. The date of final follow-up was October 31, 2022. This was a multicenter trial. Eligible patients were adults with AIS who experienced END, which was defined as an increase of 2 or more points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale within 48 hours from symptom onset. Patients who withdrew consent, experienced duplicate randomization, or were lost to follow-up were excluded from the study. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to the argatroban group and control group within 48 hours of symptom onset. Both groups received standard therapy based on guidelines, including oral mono or dual antiplatelet therapy. The argatroban group received intravenous argatroban for 7 days (continuous infusion at a dose of 60 mg per day for 2 days, followed by 20 mg per day for 5 days) in addition to standard therapy. Main Outcome and Measure: The primary end point was good functional outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 3. Results: A total of 628 patients (mean [SD] age, 65 [11.9] years; 400 male [63.7%]) were included in this study (argatroban group, 314 [50%] and control group, 314 [50%]). Of these, 18 withdrew consent, 1 had duplicate randomization, and 8 were lost to follow-up. A total of 601 patients with stroke were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Finally, 564 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis as 6 participants in the argatroban group and 31 participants in the control group did not follow the complete protocol. The number of patients with good functional outcome at 90 days was 240 (80.5%) in the argatroban group and 222 (73.3%) in the control group (risk difference, 7.2%; 95% CI, 0.6%-14.0%; risk ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.20; P = .04). The proportion of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 3 of 317 (0.9%) in the argatroban group and 2 of 272 (0.7%) in the control group (P = .78). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with AIS with END, treatment with argatroban and antiplatelet therapy resulted in a better functional outcome at 90 days. This trial provided evidence to support the use of argatroban in reducing disability for patients with END. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04275180.

Early high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin for refractory heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with stroke: Two case reports.

BACKGROUND: High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) can be effective for patients with refractory autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We report two patients with autoimmune HIT (aHIT) successfully treated with early high-dose IVIg. CASE DESCRIPTION: Case 1 was a 48-year-old male who had persisting HIT with recurrent ischemic stroke after mitral valve replacement. Case 2 was a 71-year-old male who had flush heparin HIT with cerebral venous thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty. High-dose IVIg was administered 6 and 4 days after starting argatroban due to non-improved thrombocytopenia and persistently high D-dimer values, respectively. Both patients achieved favorable functional recovery at discharge as well as improvements of thrombocytopenia and hypercoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Early high-dose IVIg may be effective for patients with aHIT and hypercoagulability.

Monitoring Direct Thrombin Inhibitors With Calibrated Diluted Thrombin Time vs Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time in Pediatric Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is the primary test used to monitor intravenous (IV) direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) but has many limitations. The plasma diluted thrombin time (dTT) has shown better correlation with DTI levels than aPTT. This study compared dose-response curves for dTT and aPTT in pediatric patients receiving argatroban and bivalirudin. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients treated with argatroban (n = 45) or bivalirudin (n = 14) monitored with dTT and aPTT. RESULTS: The dTT assay was calibrated to report DTI concentrations in µg/mL for argatroban and bivalirudin with good analytic sensitivity and specificity. The dTT was fivefold more likely to show a stable dose-response slope than the aPTT (P < .0002; odds ratio, 4.9). For patients in whom both dTT and aPTT showed a significant correlation between dose and assay results, dTT had a higher average correlation factor compared with aPTT (P = .007). Argatroban dose-response slopes showed more inter- and intrapatient variation than bivalirudin (dose-response slope coefficient of variation, 132% vs 52%). CONCLUSIONS: The dTT assay was more likely to show a stable dose response and have a stronger correlation with DTI dose than aPTT. Argatroban shows more variation in dose response than bivalirudin.

Rivaroxaban and apixaban for the treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse hematologic drug reaction that results in thrombocytopenia. This potentially life-threatening event is due to the administration of heparin products, such as unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). The incidence of HIT occurs in <0.1%-7% of hospitalized patients treated with heparin products, with a risk of thrombosis as high as 50%. In 2018, the American Society of Hematology (ASH) recommended the utilization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in clinically stable patients at average bleeding risk with HIT. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prescribing patterns of rivaroxaban and apixaban for the treatment of suspected or confirmed HIT. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review from January 2013 through October 2019 at the University of Chicago Medicine. Twelve patients were identified to have received a DOAC for suspected or confirmed HIT. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban was utilized in seven (58%) patients, six of whom received argatroban prior to starting rivaroxaban. Five (71%) of these patients were started on the recommended dose of rivaroxaban for VTE. Apixaban was utilized in five (42%) patients; four patients were started on argatroban and transitioned to apixaban. One patient was started on the suggested dose of apixaban for VTE. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: After starting DOACs for suspected HIT, no patients had new thrombosis during hospitalization. Eight patients (67%) followed up at our institution within 6 months of their discharge date. No subsequent thrombi formation were identified for any of these patients. The results of this study add to the expanding literature regarding the safety and efficacy of DOAC use in HIT, and indicate DOACs are being increasingly utilized for the treatment of confirmed or suspected HIT.

Dabigatran Use after Argatroban for Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia with Thrombosis: A Case Series and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenia following the use of heparin, which contributes to a high limb-amputation rate and mortality if not appropriately handled. There is growing evidence suggesting that novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may be effective for treating HIT. METHODS: We described five rare cases of patients with HIT associated with deep vein thrombosis treated with dabigatran, a member of NOACs. We also reviewed representative cases and literature investigating the use of NOACs to treat patients with HIT to further discuss the efficacy and safety. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Following the treatment of dabigatran after argatroban, the platelet count of patients with HIT gradually elevated and reached the normal range eventually. There was no incidence of new symptomatic, objectively-confirmed arteriovenous thromboembolism observed within the 90-day-period follow up. The patient in case 3 presented with gastric bleeding after dabigatran treatment and died in the end. The results suggested that dabigatran use after argatroban may be effective in the treatment of patients with HIT. However, safety should be reconsidered since severe complications were observed in case 3.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Plus Argatroban Prevents Early Neurological Deterioration in Branch Atherosclerosis Disease.

[Figure: see text].

Caution in Using the Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time to Monitor Argatroban in COVID-19 and Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT).

INTRODUCTION: Argatroban is licensed for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and is conventionally monitored by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) ratio. The target range is 1.5 to 3.0 times the patients' baseline APTT and not exceeding 100 s, however this baseline is not always known. APTT is known to plateau at higher levels of argatroban, and is influenced by coagulopathies, lupus anticoagulant and raised FVIII levels. It has been used as a treatment for COVID-19 and Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT). Some recent publications have favored the use of anti-IIa methods to determine the plasma drug concentration of argatroban. METHODS: Plasma of 60 samples from 3 COVID-19 patients and 54 samples from 5 VITT patients were tested by APTT ratio and anti-IIa method (dilute thrombin time dTT). Actin FS APTT ratios were derived from the baseline APTT of the patient and the mean normal APTT. RESULTS: Mean APTT ratio derived from baseline was 1.71 (COVID-19), 1.33 (VITT) compared to APTT ratio by mean normal 1.65 (COVID-19), 1.48 (VITT). dTT mean concentration was 0.64 µg/ml (COVID-19) 0.53 µg/ml (VITT) with poor correlations to COVID-19 baseline APTT ratio r2 = 0.1526 p <0.0001, mean normal r2 = 0.2188 p < 0.0001; VITT baseline APTT ratio r2 = 0.04 p < 0.001, VITT mean normal r2 = 0.0064 p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that dTT is a superior method to monitor the concentration of argatroban, we have demonstrated significant differences between APTT ratios and dTT levels, which could have clinical impact. This is especially so in COVID-19 and VITT.

Early argatroban and antiplatelet combination therapy in acute non-lacunar single subcortical infarct associated with mild intracranial atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute non-lacunar single subcortical infarct (SSI) associated with mild intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) have a relatively high incidence of early neurological deterioration (END), resulting in unfavorable functional outcomes. Whether the early administration of argatroban and aspirin or clopidogrel within 6-12 h after symptom onset is effective and safe in these patients is unknown. METHODS: A review of the stroke database of Weihai Municipal Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University and Qingdao Center Hospital, Qingdao University Medical College in China was undertaken from May 2017 to January 2020 to identify all patients with non-lacunar SSI caused by ICAS within 6-12 h of symptom onset based on MRI screening. Patients were divided into two groups, one comprising those who received argatroban and mono antiplatelet therapy with aspirin or clopidogrel on admission (argatroban group), and the other those who received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel during hospitalization (DAPT group). The primary outcome was recovery by 90 days after stroke based on a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score (0 to 1). The secondary outcome was END incidence within 120 h of admission. Safety outcomes were intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and major extracranial bleeding. The probability of clinical benefit (mRS score 0-1 at 90 days) was estimated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 304 acute non-lacunar SSI associated with mild ICAS patients were analyzed. At 90 days, 101 (74.2%) patients in the argatroban group and 80 (47.6%) in the DAPT group had an mRS score that improved from 0 to 1 (P < 0.001). The relative risk (95% credible interval) for an mRS score improving from 0 to 1 in the argatroban group was 1.50 (1.05-2.70). END occurred in 10 (7.3%) patients in the argatroban group compared with 37 (22.0%) in the DAPT group (P < 0.001). No patients experienced symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation. CONCLUSIONS: Early combined administration of argatroban and an antiplatelet agent (aspirin or clopidogrel) may be beneficial for patients with non-lacunar SSI associated with mild ICAS identified by MRI screening and may attenuate progressive neurological deficits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Our study is a retrospectively registered trial.

Use of Argatroban in Donor Lung Procurement: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immunological response to heparin exposure that predisposes patients to hypercoagulable reactions with subsequent heparin administration. Traditionally, heparin is the standard anticoagulant used during organ procurement to prevent clot formation in grafts. This creates a problem in donors or recipients that develop HIT as they are at risk of developing life-threatening coagulopathy. This raises the question of how to use alternative anticoagulation therapies, such as argatroban, that provide rapid-onset prophylaxis by reversibly inhibiting thrombin. Additionally, there are few studies that have assessed how recipients of multiorgan donors treated with argatroban do post-operatively. CASE REPORT In this report, we discuss the procurement protocol and hospital course of a lung transplant recipient who received a graft treated with argatroban due to a HIT-positive liver recipient. The post-operative course for our patient was uneventful, with improved lung function and no complications attributable to argatroban use. Further, none of the 4 other recipients who received organs from the same donor experienced graft dysfunctions secondary to coagulopathy, including the HIT-positive liver recipient. CONCLUSIONS The ultimate success of grafts without thromboembolic complications suggests the use of argatroban in multiorgan procurement in the setting of a HIT-positive recipient is safe and effective. This case report highlights an alternative to the traditional process of organ procurement with heparin, in which patients at risk of coagulopathies secondary to HIT are able to receive organs when traditional protocols would otherwise be prohibitive.

Effects of argatroban therapy for stroke patients: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic efficacy and safety of argatroban for stroke patients remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to collect all evidence and perform a meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the effects of argatroban for stroke patients compared with no-argatroban regimens. METHODS: The databases of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched from their inception up to December 2020. Categorical outcomes were summarized as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI); while continuous data were pooled as standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95%CI. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies were enrolled. Overall meta-analysis showed infusion of argatroban significantly improved neurological functions of stroke patients compared with control treatment, showing increased National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score change (SMD = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.58-1.46, p < 0.001), modified Barthel Index (SMD = 3.81; 95% CI, 2.72-4.89, p < 0.001) as well as a decreased incidence of early neurological deterioration (OR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.28-0.84, p = 0.01). Argatroban treatment did not increase the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (p = 0.733), asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (p = 0.608), gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.601), major systemic hemorrhage (p = 0.582) and mortality (p = 0.797), except minor systemic hemorrhage (OR = 2.40; 95% CI: 1.15-5.02, p = 0.020). Subgroup analyses for NIHSS score change and complications obtained the similar conclusions. CONCLUSION: Argatroban infusion may be an effective and safe therapeutic option to improve functional outcomes of stroke patients.

Using Nonheparin Anticoagulant to Treat a Near-Fatal Case With Multiple Venous Thrombotic Lesions During ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination-Related Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the successful recovery from multiple and life-threatening venous thrombosis after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: University Hospital. PATIENT: Few days after the first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, a 21-year-old woman experienced massive thrombosis in the deep and superficial cerebral veins together with seizures, neurologic focal deficit, and thrombocytopenia. In the neurointensive care unit, her condition worsened despite early decompressive craniectomy. She developed bilateral segmental pulmonary embolism, left hepatic, and left external iliac venous thrombosis. INTERVENTION: Argatroban (0.5-2.2 µg/kg/min) and high-dose IV immunoglobulin (1 g/kg/d for 2 consecutive days) were initiated on day 6 after admission. With these therapies, there was a gradual resolution of multiple sites of venous thrombosis, and platelet count returned to normal. The patient left the ICU with full consciousness, expressive aphasia, and right hemiparesis. CONCLUSIONS: This case of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia shows that a good outcome can be obtained even with multiple and life-threatening venous thrombotic lesions. Argatroban and high-dose IV immunoglobulin along with management of severe cerebral venous thrombosis played a major role in this epilogue.

Superior outcomes with Argatroban for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Background Argatroban, lepirudin, desirudin, bivalirudin, and danaparoid are commonly used to manage heparin-induced thrombocytopenia related complications. However, the most suitable drug for this condition still remains controversial. Aim of the review This Bayesian network meta-analysis study compared the most common anticoagulant drugs used in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Method All clinical trials comparing two or more anticoagulant therapies for suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were considered for inclusion. Studies concerning the use of heparins or oral anticoagulants were not considered. Data concerning hospitalisation length, thromboembolic, major, and minor haemorrhagic events, and mortality rate were collected. The network analyses were made through the STATA routine for Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis with standardised mean difference (SMD) and log odd ratio (LOR) effect measures. Results Data from a total of 4338 patients were analysed. The overall mean age was 62.31 ± 6.6 years old. Hospitalization length was considerably shorter in favour of the argatroban group (SMD: - 1.70). Argatroban evidenced the lowest rate of major (LOR: - 1.51) and minor (LOR: - 0.57) haemorrhagic events. Argatroban demonstrated the lowest rate of thromboembolic events (LOR: 0.62), and mortality rate (LOR: - 1.16). Conclusion Argatroban performed better overall for selected patients with HIT. Argatroban demonstrated the shortest hospitalization, and lowest rate of haemorrhages, thromboembolisms, and mortality compared to bivalirudin, lepirudin, desirudin, and danaparoid.

Effect of Argatroban Injection on Clinical Efficacy in Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction: Preliminary Findings.

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to observe the effects of argatroban injection and butylphthalide injection on blood flow rheology, clinical efficacy, and safety in patients with acute cerebral infarction. METHODS: 344 patients with acute cerebral infarction within 48 h after admission were divided into treatment group and control group, with 172 cases in each group. The control group received routine treatment. The treatment group received argatroban injection 60 mg on the basis of the control group, intravenously guttae (ivgtt) was used for 2 days and then changed to argatroban injection 10 mg, ivgtt bid for 5 days, and the total course of treatment was 7 days. The neurological changes, activities of daily living, and the rheology indicators (fibrinogen [Fib], platelet aggregation rate [Pag], whole blood high shear viscosity [Whsv], hematocrit [Hct]) were compared between the 2 groups, clinical efficacy and adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: After treatment, the total effective rates of the treatment group and the control group were 90.70% (156 /172 cases) and 74.41% (128 and 172 cases), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). After treatment, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores of the treatment group and the control group were (7.05 ± 1.97) and (8.30 ± 1.79), respectively, and the Barthel index was (68.02 ± 11.07) and (62.32 ± 11.46), respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). After treatment, the treatment group and the control group were (2.66 ± 0.22) g/L and (3.50 ± 0.22) g/L, respectively, and Pag were (0.68 ± 0.06)% and (0.81 ± 0.09)%, respectively, and Whsv was (6.44 ± 0.76) mPs/s and (6.87 ± 0.91) mPs/s, Hct were (8.19 ± 1.21)% and (10.44 ± 1.04)%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment group and the control group was 6.97 and 5.81%, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Argatroban injection is effective in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction, which can significantly improve the hemorheology of patients with good safety.