HDAC6 inhibitor promotes reactive oxygen species-meditated clearance of Staphylococcus aureus in macrophage.

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) pneumonia has become an increasingly important public health problem. Recent evidence suggests that epigenetic modifications are critical in the host immune defence against pathogen infection. In this study, we found that S. aureus infection induces the expression of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, by using a S. aureus pneumonia mouse model, we showed that the HDAC6 inhibitor, tubastatin A, demonstrates a protective effect in S. aureus pneumonia, decreasing the mortality and destruction of lung architecture, reducing the bacterial burden in the lungs and inhibiting inflammatory responses. Mechanistic studies in primary bone marrow-derived macrophages demonstrated that the HDAC6 inhibitors, tubastatin A and tubacin, reduced the intracellular bacterial load by promoting bacterial clearance rather than regulating phagocytosis. Finally, N-acetyl-L- cysteine, a widely used reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger, antagonized ROS production and significantly inhibited tubastatin A-induced S. aureus clearance. These findings demonstrate that HDAC6 inhibitors promote the bactericidal activity of macrophages by inducing ROS, an important host factor for S. aureus clearance and production. Our study identified HDAC6 as a suitable epigenetic modification target for preventing S. aureus infection, and tubastatin A as a useful compound in treating S. aureus pneumonia.

The efficacy of telavancin in comparison with linezolid on endotracheal tube biofilm in pigs with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: The effect of systemic treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with telavancin, a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide with good penetration in vitro biofilms, has not been tested in vivo during mechanical ventilation. This study examined the efficacy of telavancin compared with linezolid against endotracheal tube (ETT) biofilms in a porcine model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) VAP. METHODS: VAP was induced in 18 pigs by instilling 107 colony-forming units (CFU/mL) of an MRSA strain susceptible to telavancin and linezolid into each pulmonary lobe. Randomization into three groups was done at pneumonia diagnosis: control (IV glucose 0.5% solution q24); linezolid (10 mg/kg q12) and telavancin groups (22.5 mg/kg q24). After 72 h of MV, data regarding bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), tracheal aspirate (TA), ETT MRSA biofilm load and thickness measured by scanning electron microscopy were obtained. RESULTS: All 18 pigs completed the study. MRSA was isolated in 100% of ETTs from the control and linezolid groups and in 67% from the telavancin group. Telavancin treatment presented a lower MRSA load compared to the control and linezolid treatments (telavancin median [interquartile range (IQR)] = 1.94 [0.00-5.45], linezolid 3.99 [3.22-4.68] and control 4.93 [4.41-5.15], P = 0.236). Telavancin treatment also resulted in the lowest biofilm thickness according to the SEM (4.04 [2.09-6.00], P < 0.001). We found a positive correlation between ETT and BAL load (rho = 0.511, P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: In our VAP model, systemic telavancin treatment reduced ETT MRSA occurrence, load, and biofilm thickness. Our findings may have a bearing on ICU patients' clinical outcomes.

Predictive value of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus nasal swab in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and secondary bacterial pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the performance measures of admission methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swabs for MRSA bacterial pneumonia in patients co-infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS: The study included patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2-positive nasopharyngeal specimens, MRSA nasal screens, and bacterial cultures to assess secondary MRSA pneumonia. RESULTS: 293 patients and 662 microbiological cultures evaluated. Overall, the specificity (91.8% [95% CI 88.6% to 95%]) and negative predictive value (NPV 97.4% [95% CI 95.4% - 99.3%]) of MRSA nasal swabs was high. However, the sensitivity (46.2%; 95% CI 19.1% to 73.3%) and positive predictive value (PPV 20.7%; 95% CI 59.5 - 35.4%) were low. Those patients in the MRSA nasal swab negative group had a shorter median duration of linezolid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection doesn't reduce the specificity or negative predictive value of MRSA nasal swabs for secondary MRSA pneumonia.

Ventilator-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Pneumonia in a Patient with a Negative MRSA Nasal Swab.

BACKGROUND Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, MRSA testing by nasal swab has been utilized to "exclude" pneumonia caused by MRSA, given its high negative-predictive value (NPV). We present, however, a case of MRSA pneumonia diagnosed by endotracheal aspirate culture (EAC) in a patient with a negative MRSA nasal swab. CASE REPORT A 58-year-old woman presented with septic shock and respiratory failure. Chest X-ray (CXR) on admission was unrevealing; however, computed tomography (CT) revealed multifocal pneumonia. Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-level care was required for mechanical ventilation and vasopressors. She initially improved with treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and was extubated on hospital day 6; however, she then developed a fever, tachycardia, and respiratory distress necessitating re-intubation later that day. Repeat CXR demonstrated a new left lower lobe infiltrate. Blood cultures were drawn and vancomycin and cefepime were started to cover for ventilator-associated pathogens. An EAC and nasal swab were collected to test for MRSA. The next day (day 7), the MRSA nasal swab returned negative, and vancomycin was discontinued. Our patient continued to experience fevers, worsening leukocytosis, and ongoing vasopressor need. On hospital day 9, the EAC results were obtained, and were positive for MRSA. Vancomycin was restarted and our patient recovered. CONCLUSIONS Negative MRSA nasal screening may be considered grounds to de-escalate empiric MRSA antibiotics if MRSA prevalence is low. However, in critically ill patients with high risk and suspicion for MRSA pneumonia, discontinuing empiric MRSA coverage should be done with caution or clinicians should wait until respiratory culture results are obtained before de-escalating antibiotics.

IL-9 promotes methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia by regulating the polarization and phagocytosis of macrophages.

In this study, we examined the effect of Il9 deletion on macrophages in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. MRSA-infected mice were employed for the in vivo experiments, and RAW264.7 cells were stimulated with MRSA for the in vitro experiments. Macrophage polarization was determined by flow cytometry and quantitative real-time PCR; macrophage phagocytosis was assessed by flow cytometry and laser scanning confocal microscopy; cell apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry and western blotting. Il9 deletion markedly elevated macrophage phagocytosis and M2 macrophages in MRSA infection, which was accompanied by elevated expression of Il10 and Arg1 and reduced expression of Inos, tumor necrosis factor-α (Tnfα), and Il6. Il9 deletion also inhibited macrophage apoptosis in MRSA infection, which was manifested by elevated B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) protein level and reduced protein levels of cleaved cysteine protease 3 (CASPASE-3) and BCL2-Associated X (BAX). Both the in vivo and in vitro experiments further showed the activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT (also known as protein kinase B, PKB) signaling pathway in MRSA infection and that the regulation of Il9 expression may be dependent on Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2/PI3K pathway. The above results showed that Il9 deletion exhibited a protective role against MRSA infection by promoting M2 polarization and phagocytosis of macrophages and the regulation of Il9 partly owing to the activation of TLR2/PI3K pathway, proposing a novel therapeutic strategy for MRSA-infected pneumonia.

The combination of insulin and linezolid ameliorates Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia in individuals with diabetes via the TLR2/MAPKs/NLRP3 pathway.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) complicated with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infection lacks effective treatment strategies. In this study, we found that insulin combined with linezolid has potential to deal with the thorny problem. In vitro, our drug sensitivity assay, bacterial growth curve and hemolytic tests showed that a combination of insulin and linezolid exerted good antibacterial and anti-α-hemolysin activity, CCK8 experiment, glucose content and glycogen content determination showed that the combination of insulin and linezolid increased murine macrophage survival rate and reduced the extracellular glucose level of high glucose-treated MH-S cells and intracellular glycogen level, and Western blot showed that the combination inhibited TLR2/MAPKs/NLRP3-related inflammatory pathways in MH-S cells. The results of in vivo experiments showed that the combination therapy stabilized glucose level, remained body weight, ameliorated lung injury including improving pulmonary edema and decreasing lung wet/dry weight ratio, reduced the CFUs and inflammation in the lung tissue in a mouse model of diabetes with S. aureus pneumonia, and inhibited the expression of TLR2, MAPKs and NLRP3 inflammatory pathway. Overall, the combination of insulin and linezolid as autolytic inhibitor exhibited the effects of significant antibacterial and improving glucose level in vitro and in vivo, and also has an anti-inflammation activity via the TLR2/MAPKs/NLRP3 pathway, this paves the way for new treatments for diabetes mellitus complicated with S. aureus infection.

Evaluating Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Polymerase Chain Reaction Nasal Screening as a Tool for Antimicrobial Stewardship.

INTRODUCTION: Initiation of broad-spectrum empiric antibiotics is common when infection is suspected in hospitalized adults. The benefits of early utilization of effective antibiotics are well documented. However, the negative effects of inappropriate antibiotic use have led to antimicrobial stewardship mandates. Recent data demonstrate the utility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasal screening to steward anti-MRSA empiric antibiotics in pneumonia. We hypothesize that MRSA PCR nasal swabs would also be effective to rule out other MRSA infection to effectively limit unnecessary antibiotics for any infectious source. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective chart review of all adult patient encounters from October 2019-July 2021 with MRSA PCR nasal testing. We then reviewed all charts to evaluate for the presence of infections based on source cultures results, as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were calculated from 2 × 2 contingency tables. RESULTS: Among all patients with MRSA nasal screening, 1189 patients had any infection. Prevalence of MRSA nasal carriage among patients screened was 12%. Prevalence of MRSA infection among all infections was 7.5%. MRSA nasal swabs demonstrated a negative predictive value of 100% for MRSA urinary tract infection, 97.9% for MRSA bacteremia, 97.8% for MRSA pneumonia, 92.1% for MRSA wound infection, and 96.6% for other MRSA infections. Overall, MRSA PCR nasal swabs had a sensitivity of 68.5%, specificity of 90.1%, positive predictive value of 23.7%, and negative predictive value of 98.5% for any infections. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA PCR nasal swabs have a high negative predictive value for all infections. Our data support the use of MRSA PCR nasal swabs to rule out MRSA infection and thereby allow early de-escalation of MRSA coverage in hospitalized patients requiring empiric antibiotics. Implementation of MRSA screening could decrease antibiotic-associated morbidity, resistance, and costs. More studies should be conducted to validate these results and support these findings.

A 600 mg of fixed-dose linezolid in renally impaired patients versus 15 mg/kg intermittent dose-optimized vancomycin in renally non-impaired patients: A single centre retrospective analysis for adult patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

OBJECTIVES: Both linezolid and vancomycin are approved by USFDA and IDSA guidelines for the management of nosocomial pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in clinical practice. Baseline creatinine clearance is the criterion for prescribing vancomycin or linezolid for hospital-acquired pneumonia in our institution. However, patients with renal function impairment are far more difficult to manage in intensive care. Thus, the objectives of the study were to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of 600 mg of fixed-dose linezolid with intermittent dose-optimised vancomycin in hospital-acquired pneumonia due to MRSA and to evaluate parameters of clinical cure. METHODS: Analysis of a review of patients' charts. Patients with creatinine clearance <80 ml/min received 600 mg linezolid/12 h (n = 139, LN cohort), and patients with creatinine clearance ≥80 ml/min received intravenous 15 mg/kg vancomycin/12 h for 1-2 weeks consecutively or 3 weeks in case of bacteremia (n = 152, VC cohort) for management of hospital-acquired pneumonia due to MRSA. RESULTS: A 59% of patients from the LN cohort and 47% of patients from the VC cohort were clinically cured. Administration of systemic steroids (p = 0.0412) and ≥ 80 ml/min creatinine clearance (p = 0.0498) were the independent parameters for the clinical cure of patients. Nephrotoxicity was higher among patients of the VC cohort than the LN cohort (p = 0.0464). Treatment failed in 41% of patients from the LN cohort and in 53% of patients from the VC cohort (p = 0.0200). CONCLUSIONS: A 600 mg of fixed-dose linezolid is an ideal alternative to intermittent dose-optimised vancomycin for better clinical outcomes for patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia due to MRSA, especially for patients with renal impairment.

Machine Learning To Stratify Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Risk among Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an uncommon but serious cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A lack of validated MRSA CAP risk factors can result in overuse of empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics. We sought to develop robust models predicting the risk of MRSA CAP using machine learning using a population-based sample of hospitalized patients with CAP admitted to either a tertiary academic center or a community teaching hospital. Data were evaluated using a machine learning approach. Cases were CAP patients with MRSA isolated from blood or respiratory cultures within 72 h of admission; controls did not have MRSA CAP. The Classification Tree Analysis algorithm was used for model development. Model predictions were evaluated in sensitivity analyses. A total of 21 of 1,823 patients (1.2%) developed MRSA within 72 h of admission. MRSA risk was higher among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in the first 24 h who required mechanical ventilation than among ICU patients who did not require ventilatory support (odds ratio [OR], 8.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4 to 32). MRSA risk was lower among patients admitted to ward units than among those admitted to the ICU (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.56) and lower among ICU patients without a history of antibiotic use in the last 90 days than among ICU patients with antibiotic use in the last 90 days (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.59). The final machine learning model was highly accurate (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] area = 0.775) in training and jackknife validity analyses. We identified a relatively simple machine learning model that predicted MRSA risk in hospitalized patients with CAP within 72 h postadmission.

Pharmacist-Driven Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing for Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be detected using nasal swab polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay and is associated with clinical MRSA infection. The MRSA nasal PCR has a rapid turnaround time and a negative predictive value for MRSA pneumonia of >98%; however, data are limited in critically ill patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of a pharmacist-driven algorithm, utilizing MRSA PCR nasal screening on duration of anti-MRSA therapy in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with suspected pneumonia. METHODS: A single-center pre/post study was conducted in 4 ICUs at a large tertiary care community hospital. Adult patients admitted to the ICU initiated on vancomycin or linezolid for pneumonia managed using a pharmacist-driven MRSA PCR algorithm were included in the algorithm cohort. A historical cohort with standard management was matched 1:1 by age, type of pneumonia, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score. The primary outcome was duration of anti-MRSA therapy. Secondary outcomes included MRSA rates, number of vancomycin levels, new onset of acute kidney injury (AKI), ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 245 patients screened, 50 patients met inclusion criteria for the algorithm cohort and were matched to 50 patients in the historical cohort. The duration of anti-MRSA therapy was significantly lower compared with the historical cohort (47 vs 95 hours; P < 0.001). Secondary outcomes were similar between groups for MRSA rates, new onset of AKI, LOS, and mortality. There were less vancomycin levels ordered in the algorithm cohort (2 vs 3, P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacist-driven MRSA PCR algorithm significantly reduced anti-MRSA duration of therapy in critically ill patients with pneumonia. Future studies should validate these results in critically ill populations and in settings where MRSA pneumonia is more prevalent.

Characteristics and local risk factors of community-acquired and health-care-associated Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia.

This study aims at identifying characteristics, risk factors and mortality of community-acquired (CAP) and health-care-associated pneumonia (HCAP) by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). We retrieved adults with S. aureus CAP or HCAP diagnosed by blood or pleural effusion culture in 2.6 years, and compared with those of Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) CAP or HCAP diagnosed by blood or respiratory culture, or urine antigen. We found 18 patients with CAP and 9 HCAP due to S. aureus (female 33%, 66.6 ± 12.4 years-old), and 48 patients with CAP and 15 HCAP due to S pneumoniae (female 41%, 69.5 ± 17.5 years). Diabetes mellitus (52% vs. 24%, p = 0.019), hemodialysis (11% vs. 0%, p = 0.046), skin lesions (44% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), cavitary nodules (37% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001) and pleural effusions (48% vs. 18%, p = 0.007) were more common in staphylococcal than pneumococcal group. Three patients with staphylococcal pneumonia had acute myocardial infarction. Pneumonia severity index (139 ± 52 vs. 109 ± 43, p = 0.005) and 30-day mortality (41% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.001) were higher in staphylococcal group. Multivariate analysis showed underlying disease (especially cancer and cirrhosis), risk class 4/5, altered mentality, shock and bilateral pneumonia were risk factors for 30-day mortality.

The Azithromycin Pro-Drug CSY5669 Boosts Bacterial Killing While Attenuating Lung Inflammation Associated with Pneumonia Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Antibiotic resistance is a major problem, with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) being a prototypical example in surgical and community-acquired infections. S. aureus, like many pathogens, is immune evasive and able to multiply within host immune cells. Consequently, compounds that aid host immunity (e.g., by stimulating the host-mediated killing of pathogens) are appealing alternatives or adjuncts to classical antibiotics. Azithromycin is both an antibacterial and an immunomodulatory drug that accumulates in immune cells. We set out to improve the immunomodulatory properties of azithromycin by coupling the immune activators, nitric oxide and acetate, to its core structure. This new compound, designated CSY5669, enhanced the intracellular killing of MRSA by 45% ± 20% in monocyte-derived macrophages and by 55% ± 15% in peripheral blood leukocytes, compared with untreated controls. CSY5669-treated peripheral blood leukocytes produced fewer proinflammatory cytokines, while in both monocyte-derived macrophages and peripheral blood leukocytes, phagocytosis, ROS production, and degranulation were unaffected. In mice with MRSA pneumonia, CSY5669 treatment reduced inflammation, lung pathology and vascular leakage with doses as low as 0.01 µmol/kg p.o. CSY5669 had diminished direct in vitro antibacterial properties compared with azithromycin. Also, CSY5669 was immunomodulatory at concentrations well below 1% of the minimum inhibitory concentration, which would minimize selection for macrolide-resistant bacteria if it were to be used as a host-directed therapy. This study highlights the potential of CSY5669 as a possible adjunctive therapy in pneumonia caused by MRSA, as CSY5669 could enhance bacterial eradication while simultaneously limiting inflammation-associated pathology.

Comparison of mortality and clinical failure rates between vancomycin and teicoplanin in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Very few studies have compared the effects and side effects of vancomycin and teicoplanin in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of vancomycin and teicoplanin in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. METHODS: This study examined 116 patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia who met the inclusion criteria and were treated with either vancomycin (n = 54) or teicoplanin (n = 62). The primary (i.e., clinical failure during treatment) and secondary outcomes (i.e., mortality rates, discontinuation of study drugs due to treatment failure, side effects, and clinical cure) were evaluated. RESULTS: The vancomycin group presented lower clinical failure rates (25.9% vs. 61.3%, p < 0.001), discontinuation due to treatment failure (22.2% vs. 41.9%, p = 0.024), and mortality rates (3.7% vs 19.4%, p = 0.010). The Cox proportional hazard model revealed that teicoplanin was a significant clinical failure predictor compared with vancomycin (adjusted odds ratio, 2.198; 95% confidence interval 1.163-4.154). The rates of drug change due to side effects were higher in the vancomycin group than in the teicoplanin group (24.1% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin presented favorable treatment outcomes and more side effects compared with teicoplanin, which suggests that clinicians would need to consider the efficacy and potential side effects of these drugs before prescription.

Natural flavone hispidulin protects mice from Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia by inhibition of α-hemolysin production via targeting AgrAC.

The emergence of drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) has limited drug options for the clinical treatment of S. aureus infections. Considering recent reports, therapeutic strategies targeting bacterial virulence hold great promise, and alpha-hemolysin (encoded by hla), a critical virulence factor of S. aureus, plays a vital role during bacterial infection. Herein, we demonstrated that hispidulin effectively inhibited the hemolytic activity of S. aureus USA300 without suppressing bacterial growth, along with inhibiting hla transcription and expression in a dose-dependent manner. As heptamer formation is essential for hla-mediated invasion of cells, nevertheless, hispidulin did not affect the deoxycholate-induced oligomerization of hla, suggesting that hispidulin did not affect the protein activity of hla. In vitro assays illustrated that hispidulin bound to agrAC, a crucial protein in quorum sensing. Meanwhile, hispidulin alleviated A549 cell damage caused by S. aureus USA300 and reduced lactate dehydrogenase release. In vivo studies showed that hispidulin had a protective effect against pneumonia caused by S. aureus USA300 in mice. S. aureus did not develop resistance to hispidulin in the short term. Interestingly, our research indicated that hispidulin synergized with the antibacterial activity of cefoxitin. These results showed that hispidulin effectively inhibited α-hemolysin expression by inhibiting the agr quorum sensing of S. aureus. It has promise as an agent to treat S. aureus infection.

The pro-inflammatory effect of Staphylokinase contributes to community-associated Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia.

Pneumonia caused by community-associated Staphylococcus aureus (CA-SA) has high morbidity and mortality, but its pathogenic mechanism remains to be further investigated. Herein, we identify that staphylokinase (SAK) is significantly induced in CA-SA and inhibits biofilm formation in a plasminogen-dependent manner. Importantly, SAK can enhance CA-SA-mediated pneumonia in both wild-type and cathelicidins-related antimicrobial peptide knockout (CRAMP-/-) mice, suggesting that SAK exacerbates pneumonia in a CRAMP-independent manner. Mechanistically, SAK induces pro-inflammatory effects, especially in the priming step of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Moreover, we demonstrate that SAK can increase K+ efflux, production of reactive oxygen species production, and activation of NF-κB signaling. Furthermore, the NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor can counteract the effective of SAK induced CA-SA lung infection in mice. Taken together, we speculate that SAK exacerbates CA-SA-induced pneumonia by promoting NLRP3 inflammasome activation, providing new insights into the pathogenesis of highly virulent CA-SA and emphasizes the importance of controlling inflammation in acute pneumonia.

MRSA nasal swab PCR to de-escalate antibiotics in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swab polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay has a 96.1-99.2% negative predictive value (NPV) in pneumonia and may be used for early de-escalation of MRSA-active antibiotic agents. Xu (2018), File (2010) [1,2]. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine if a negative MRSA PCR nasal swab collected in the emergency department (ED) improves early MRSA-active antibiotic de-escalation. METHODS: A single center observational cohort study used ICD-10 codes to identify records for adults admitted to the ED with a hospital discharge diagnosis of pneumonia. The primary outcome was proportion of patients with early de-escalation on an MRSA-active agent (≤ 1 dose). Secondary outcomes included rate of acute kidney injury (AKI), positive MRSA cultures (blood culture, respiratory sputum, tracheal aspirate), hospital length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission rates. RESULTS: A total of 341 patients were included in the study. Of the patients with an MRSA PCR swab, 35.2% of patients with a negative swab received >1 dose of MRSA-active agent compared to 52% of patients without an MRSA nasal swab (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes except readmission rate of 1.6% of patients that did not have an MRSA swab in the ED vs 6.6% of patients that received an MRSA swab in the ED. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: MRSA PCR nasal swabs in the ED may serve as a useful tool for early MRSA-active antibiotic de-escalation when treating pneumonia.

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia/Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). MRSA pneumonia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Several virulence factors allow S. aureus to become an effective pathogen. The polysaccharide intracellular adhesin allows for the production of biofilms, some strains can produce capsular polysaccharides that protect against phagocytosis, microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) allow for colonization of epithelial surfaces, and S. aureus secretes several exotoxins that aid in tissue destruction. The α-hemolysin exotoxin secreted by S. aureus is one of the most important virulence factors for the bacteria. The diagnosis of MRSA pneumonia can be challenging; the infection may present as a mild respiratory infection or severe respiratory failure and septic shock. Many individuals are colonized with MRSA and thus a positive nasopharyngeal swab does not confirm infection in the lower respiratory tract. The management of MRSA pneumonia has evolved. Historically, vancomycin has been the primary antibiotic used to treat MRSA pneumonia. Over the past decade, prospective studies have shown that linezolid leads to higher rates of clinical cure. Monoclonal antibodies are being studied as potential therapeutic options. MRSA is an important cause of HAP/VAP; novel diagnostics may facilitate rapid diagnosis of this infection and the available literature should be used to make informed decisions on management.

Impact of Prior-to-Admission Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screening in Critically Ill Adults With Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: The high negative predictive value (NPV) of a negative nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) result in suspected MRSA pneumonia is well established; however, data are limited on the NPV of samples collected prior to hospital admission for critically ill patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive characteristics of MRSA nares screening performed prior to hospital admission in critically ill adult patients diagnosed with pneumonia. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in critically ill patients with pneumonia and MRSA nares screening within 60 days of respiratory culture. The primary outcome was NPV of MRSA nares for MRSA pneumonia using samples within 60 days compared to in-hospital respiratory cultures. A sensitivity analysis was performed for samples within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were prevalence, positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, and MRSA pneumonia risk factors. RESULTS: The NPV for MRSA nares screening collected prior to hospital admission was high at 98% (95% CI = 96%-99%) for samples collected within 60 days (n = 243) and 99% (95% CI: 94%-99.9%) for samples within 30 days (n = 119). Specificity for MRSA nares collected 60 days prior to admission (96%, 95% CI: 93-98) and 30 days (96%, 95% CI: 91%-99%) were both high. PPV and sensitivity were lower. Risk factors for MRSA pneumonia were similar. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: MRSA nares screening within 60 days of intensive care unit admission has a high NPV and specificity for MRSA pneumonia in critically ill patients and may be a powerful stewardship tool for avoidance of empirical anti-MRSA therapy.

Current pharmacotherapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, several antibiotics are active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and can be used for the treatment of pneumonia. They show great variability in terms of antibiotic class, indication, pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties, type of available formulations, spectrum of activity against bacteria other than MRSA, and toxicity profile. AREAS COVERED: In this narrative review, the authors discuss the characteristics of currently available agents for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia. EXPERT OPINION: The availability of different agents with anti-MRSA activity, and approved for the treatment of pneumonia can allow a personalized approach for any given patient based on the severity of the disease, the setting of occurrence, the patient's baseline risk of toxicity and drug interactions, and the possibility of oral therapy whenever early discharge or outpatient treatment are possible. Although some gray areas still remain, like the lack of high certainty evidence on the efficacy of some old agents and on the precise role of companion agents with toxin inhibitory activity in the case of necrotizing pneumonia, the frequent availability of different treatment choices, each with peculiar characteristics, is already allowing an important step toward a precision medicine approach for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia.