Randomized Trial Comparing a Stent-Avoiding With a Stent-Preferred Strategy in Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Limited comparative data exist on different interventional strategies for endovascular revascularization of complex femoropopliteal interventions. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors aimed to compare a stent-avoiding (SA) vs a stent-preferred (SP) strategy, promoting optimal lesion preparation and the use of drug-eluting technologies in both arms. METHODS: Within a prospective, multicenter, pilot study, 120 patients with symptomatic complex femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2-4, mean lesion length 187.7 ± 78.3 mm, 79.2% total occlusions) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to endovascular treatment with either paclitaxel-coated balloons or polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting stents. Lesion preparation including the use of devices for plaque modification and/or removal was at the operators' discretion in both treatment arms. RESULTS: In the SA group, lesion preparation was more frequently performed (71.7% SA [43/60] vs 51.7% [31/60] SP; P = 0.038) with a high provisional stenting rate (48.3% [29/60]). At the 12-month follow-up, primary patency was 78.2% (43/55) in the SA group and 78.6% (44/56) in the SP group (P = 1.0; relative risk: 0.995; 95% CI: 0.818-1.210). Freedom from major adverse events was determined in 93.1% (54/58) in the SA group and in 94.9% (56/59) in the SP group (P = 0.717; relative risk: 0.981; 95% CI: 0.895-1.075), with all adverse events attributable to clinically driven target lesion revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Both endovascular strategies promoting lesion preparation before the use of drug-eluting devices suggest promising efficacy and safety results in complex femoropopliteal procedures with a high proportion of total occlusions through 12 months. Ongoing follow-up will show whether different results emerge over time. (Best Endovascular Strategy for Complex Lesions of the Superficial Femoral Artery [BEST-SFA]; NCT03776799).

A multicenter prospective observational study appraising the effectiveness of the Supera stent after subintimal recanalization of femoro-popliteal artery occlusion: The SUPERSUB II study.

BACKGROUND: Complex femoropopliteal artery disease represents a challenge. The Supera stent holds the promise of improving the results of endovascular therapy for complex femoropopliteal disease. AIMS: We aimed at appraising the early and long-term effectiveness of the Supera stent after successful subintimal angioplasty (SuperSUB strategy) for complex femoropopliteal lesions. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, single-arm observational study including consecutive patients at participating centers in whom Supera was implanted after successful subintimal angioplasty for complex femoropopliteal lesions. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were included Femoropopliteal arteries were the most common target, and lesion length was 261 ± 102 mm. Most procedures were technically demanding, with antegrade femoral access in 35 (38%) and retrograde distal access in 55 (60%). Supera stent length was 281 ± 111 mm, with 4, 5, and 6 mm devices being most commonly used: 32 (35%), 35 (38%), and 23 (25%), respectively. Technical success was achieved in 100% of subjects, as was clinical success (per subject), whereas procedural success (per subject) was obtained in 98%. At 24 months, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was 93%, whereas primary patency was 87%. When compared with a similar historical cohort, Supera stent use appeared to be associated with a reduction in resources. CONCLUSION: Use of Supera stent after successful subintimal recanalization of complex lower limb arterial lesions yields favorable procedural results, which are maintained over follow-up, and are associated also with a favorable resource use profile.

Predictors of Crossing Failure in Femoropopliteal Lesions: The Importance of Length of the Lesion and Calcification.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy is nowadays the first choice for most patients with peripheral artery disease. The most important cause of technical failure is failure to cross the lesion with a wire. In this retrospective study, we explore possible risk factors of crossing failure. METHODS: We included all consecutive patients in whom the lesion could not be crossed in the period of the January 1, 2017-January 1, 2022. The lesions of these patients were compared with patients in whom the lesion could be crossed (2:1). The following potential anatomical risk factors were compared: location of the lesion, occlusion length, lesion length, Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring Scale, Peripheral Academic Research Consortium, circumferential characterization classification, and the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II classification. RESULTS: In 71 patients, the lesion could not be crossed; these patients were compared with 142 patients. There were significantly more patients with hypertension and hyperlipidemia in the group with crossing failure. The following factors were risk factors for crossing failure: occlusion length, lesion length, Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring Scale, Peripheral Academic Research Consortium, and circumferential characterization classification. CONCLUSIONS: Although conclusions should be carefully drawn from this retrospective study, calcification and length of the lesion are associated with crossing failure in the femoropopliteal segment. The Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II classification was the best predictor of crossing failure.

Retrospective Case Control Matched Comparison of the Antegrade Versus Retrograde Strategy After Antegrade Recanalisation Failure in Complex de novo Femoropopliteal Occlusive Lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate dissection severity, need for bailout stenting and limb outcomes in patients undergoing antegrade vs. retrograde revascularisation. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent either antegrade or retrograde revascularisation after failed antegrade recanalisation of long femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion (CTO) due to symptomatic peripheral artery disease between January 2017 and June 2022 were studied. Retrospective case control matching was used to adjust for lesion length and calcification using the peripheral artery calcification scoring system (PACSS). Procedural outcomes included severity of dissection (Type A to F dissections, numerically graded on a scale from 0 - 6 with increasing severity) after angioplasty and number and location of stents needed to be implanted during the index procedure. Additionally, clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR) and major (above ankle) amputation rates were assessed during follow up. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients were analysed who underwent antegrade (n = 90) or retrograde after failed antegrade (n = 90) recanalisation. The median patient age was 76.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 67.0, 82.0) years and 76 (42.2%) were female. Moreover, 78 patients (43.3%) had intermittent claudication, whereas 102 (56.7%) had chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). The mean lesion length was 30.0 (IQR 24.0, 36.0) cm with moderate to severe (3.0 [IQR 2.0, 4.0]) lesion calcification. Dissection severity after angioplasty was higher in the antegrade than retrograde after failed antegrade recanalisation group (4.0 [IQR 3.0, 4.0] vs. 3.0 [IQR 2.0, 4.0]; p < .001). Additionally, the number of stents in all segments and the rate of bailout stenting in popliteal segments was significantly higher with the antegrade strategy (2.0 [IQR 1.0, 3.0] vs. 1.0 [IQR 0, 2.0], p < .010; and 37% vs. 14%, p < .001). During a median follow up of 1.48 (IQR 0.63, 3.09) years, CD-TLR rates (p = .90) and amputation rates in patients with CLTI (p = .15) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In complex femoropopliteal CTOs, retrograde after failed antegrade recanalisation, is safe for endovascular revascularisation, which in experienced hands may result in less severe dissections and lower rates of stent placement. However, considering the relatively short follow up, CD-TLR and amputation rates were not statistically different between the two approaches. [German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00015277.].

Duplex Scans Performed Immediately Following Lower Extremity Angioplasty and Stenting are of Limited Utility.

BACKGROUND: Together with clinical examination, surveillance duplex examination represents the Society of Vascular Surgery recommendations for follow-up after endovascular intervention on the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and popliteal arterial segments. Compliance with postprocedural follow-up remains challenging. To establish a postangioplasty physiologic baseline, our institution began obtaining immediate postprocedural surveillance studies following lower extremity arterial interventions. We reviewed the utility of immediate postprocedural surveillance to determine if these studies enhanced postoperative care. METHODS: Serial patients undergoing SFA and popliteal angioplasty and stenting from January 2014 to December 2020 were identified from our prospectively maintained Vascular Surgery database. Patient demographic information, procedural details, and procedural outcomes were subsequently analyzed from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-three patients underwent 385 SFA and/or popliteal angioplasty/stenting interventions. Mean patient age was 64.8 ± 10 years. Among these 385 procedures, 350 (90.9%) were followed by immediate (<4 hours) postprocedural lower extremity arterial duplex scans. These 350 procedures included percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting of the SFA (n = 236), popliteal artery (n = 34), or both (n = 80). Of these studies, 25 results (7.1%) were abnormal. One asymptomatic patient was admitted to hospital for immediate thrombolysis; however, the remaining 24 patients were followed clinically with no immediate intervention required. Abnormal results included 13 abnormalities appreciated on the final angiogram with 9 patients with known occlusions or stenoses, and 4 patients with mild to moderate CFA stenosis. Abnormal findings not detected on the final angiogram included 7 patients with mild to moderate stenosis and 5 patients with short occlusions (1.4%). All 5 patients with short segmental occlusions not detected on final arteriogram had preprocedural anatomy classified as either TASC C (TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus: SFA occlusions > 15 cm in length, n = 1) or TASC D (SFA occlusions > 20 cm in lenth, n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate postprocedural duplex scans demonstrate significant vessel stenosis or occlusion in approximately 7% of cases but most stenoses and occlusions were noted on final arteriography. Duplex detected short segmental occlusions not noted on final arteriography were rare (1.4%), and occurred among patients with TASC C or TASC D occlusive disease. These duplex detected abnormalities rarely changed the patient's immediate plan of care. The performance of these immediate postprocedural duplex scans demonstrated limited clinical utility.

A unique mechanism of restenosis after drug-coated balloon in peripheral artery: Insight from optical frequency domain imaging.

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have been widely used in endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal arteries with atherosclerotic lesions. Vascular response after DCBs remains unclear. This mini-review proposes a possible mechanism of restenosis after the DCB strategy. Balloon dilatation including DCBs expands the vascular lumen by producing dissections, which is composed of the original vascular lumen and the cavity surrounded by dissected flaps. The cavity surrounded by dissected flaps is eventually replaced with the thrombus in the healing process after balloon dilatation. However, the thrombus may propagate to the expanded vascular lumen through the entry point of the dissection. Subsequently, the thrombus both in the cavity and the expanded lumen would be organized over time. The vascular lumen in the chronic-phase after DCBs may be influenced by the propagated thrombus from the cavity surrounded by dissected flaps.

Assessment of Sirolimus- vs. paCLitaxEl-coated balloon angioPlasty In atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesiOnS (ASCLEPIOS Study): preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: There appears to be an association between paclitaxel-coated devices and increased 5-year all-cause mortality. METHODS: We are conducting a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center, noninferiority study. All consecutive patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease who fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria are sequentially and consecutively assigned to either paclitaxel (Ranger, Boston Scientific) or sirolimus (MagicTouch, Concept Medical) coated balloon angioplasty treatment. The primary outcome are procedural success and primary vessel patency at index procedure. The secondary outcomes are 30-day and 12-month freedom from MAEs (amputation, death, TLR/TVR, MI, distal embolization that requires a separate intervention or hospitalization), procedural success (≤30% residual diameter stenosis or occlusion after the procedure), Rutherford category improvement (reduction ≤1 category) and ABI improvement (increase ≥0.10 from baseline). RESULTS: A total of six patients have been enrolled in the present study up to now. The mean age was 72.6 years old and five were male. All patients had angiographic evidence of isolated occlusion in the transition segment of the distal femoral superficial artery in the popliteal artery. The mean length was 109 mm. Three patients were treated by sirolimus-coated (group A) and three by paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty (group B). The primary patency and procedural success was in two of three and three of three patients, for group A and B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results show safety and feasibility of the Sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty. Further investigation and increase of sample size will allow for more sustained conclusions regarding patency and procedural success of this type of balloons for the endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease.

Technical performance and reproducibility following rotational atherectomy of femoropopliteal artery occlusive lesions: analysis of the multicenter MORPHEAS Registry.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to define patient and anatomical factors associated with technical results specific to rotational atherectomy. Controversy exists surrounding appropriate utilization of atherectomy to treat femoral-popliteal atherosclerosis. Importantly, the existence of different atherectomy devices and lack of technical reports highlighting variables that impact outcomes obscures the ability to assess perioperative performance. METHODS: The nonindustry sponsored, Multicentric National Registry on the use of rotational atherectomy in femoral-popliteal occlusive atherosclerotic disease (MORPHEAS) database was queried. The MORPHEAS investigators included experienced providers at four centers who previously had not utilized rotational atherectomy. The primary endpoint was flow-limiting dissection and/or >50% recoil resulting in stent-placement while a secondary endpoint included peripheral thromboembolism incidence. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients were enrolled. Only femoropopliteal occlusions were included in the analysis and anatomic distribution and calcification severity were depicted separately. The most common adjunctive therapy was drug-coated balloon angioplasty (84%; N.=96). Flow-limiting dissection was identified in 16% (N.=18) and thromboembolism occurred in 4% (N.=4). Diabetes increased risk of thromboembolism (P=0.03) while lesion length ≥8.0 cm (P=0.07) and SFA-popliteal adductor canal location (P=0.01) were associated with flow-limiting dissection. In multivariable analysis, SFA-popliteal adductor canal occlusion had a 4.7-fold risk of perioperative complications (OR=4.7, 95%CI: 1.1-21.0; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Rotational atherectomy was characterized by reproducible performance among four centers; however, diabetic patients, as well as those with long-segment, heavily calcified SFA-popliteal adductor canal occlusion present greatest risk of complications.

Viabahn-Assisted Extra-Arterial Bypass Combined With Surgical Arterial Endarterectomy as a Salvage Technique to Treat Critical Limb Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Revascularization of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) is always challenging because of long occlusive arterial lesions with severe calcification and poor general condition. Here we describe a novel hybrid technique to treat a CLI patient. METHODS: The patient was a 60-year-old male with left foot ulcer. Preoperative scan showed long calcific and occlusive lesions running from the left proximal common femoral artery to P1 of the popliteal artery (PA). Surgical endarterectomy was performed on the proximal femoral artery. Then, retrograde PA access was achieved to protect the vital collateral artery at the proximal PA. When the retrograde V18 guidewire failed to advance because of severe occlusion in the middle one-third of the SFA, we punctured the artery with the V18 guidewire, and manually introduced it into the lumen of the proximal SFA. Three Viabahn stent grafts were successively implanted, parts of which were situated outside the SFA. RESULTS: Computed tomography 1 week after surgery showed patent blood flow to the left toes. Good recovery was observed during a 1-year follow up, the toe wound healed after amputation, and no rest pain recurred. Ultrasound showed 60% stenosis in the PA stent, while the other stents were patent. The anklebrachial index of the left limb was 0.48. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates successful use of Viabahn-assisted extra-arterial bypass combined with surgical arterial endarterectomy to salvage the limb after CLI. This novel technique might be an alternative in carefully selected patients.

Hybrid Deep Venous ARterialisation (DVAR) for No-Option Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid Deep Venous ARterialisation (DVAR) is offered as a last-ditch attempt for limb salvage in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). It provides non-selective arterialisation independent of the angiosome, which harnesses the complex venous capillary network bed developed in the leg and foot. METHODS: We present two elderly men who underwent DVAR to salvage limb with CLTI. DVAR was performed by creating an arteriovenous connection by anastomosis of the great saphenous vein (GSV) at the level of the distal popliteal and proximal tibio-peroneal trunk. Fasciotomy was performed over the length of the GSV. Subsequently, proximal in-situ catheter valvotomies of the GSV valves were undergone with the adjuvant on-table balloon maturation. The distal tarsal veins underwent balloon valvotomy under direct vision with subsequent proximal and distal tarsal veins valvuloplasties. Completion angiogram demonstrated restoration of the flow in the foot and both the patients were relieved of rest pain. CONCLUSION: We successfully performed DVAR in 2 elderly patients. Our experience shows that DVAR is a simple and safe option that is easily reproducible without the need for complex endovascular hardware, only if a suitable GSV to the foot is available with no history of deep vein thrombosis.

Evaluation of Long-Term Outcomes of Femoropopliteal Bypass Surgery in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in an Endovascular Era.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the long-term outcomes of femoropopliteal bypass surgery in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II), type D (TASC D) femoropopliteal disease. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for all consecutive patients undergoing above-knee (AK) femoropopliteal bypass surgery at an academic vascular centre between January 2007 and March 2019. Patients with claudication (IC) and patients with CLTI were included. Patency rates and freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE) after 5 years were analysed. RESULTS: In total, 432 femoropopliteal grafts were performed. Indications for surgery were claudication and CLTI in 232 (53.7%) and 200 (46.3%) patients, respectively. Graft material was autologous vein in 186 patients (43.1%), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in 128 patients (29.6%), and heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (HePTFE) in 118 patients (27.3%). At the 5-year follow-up, the primary patency rate was 58.1% and 58.3% in patients with CLTI and claudication, respectively. Secondary patency rates were 74.1% and 68.6%, respectively. Freedom from MALE was 64.5% and 61.9%, respectively. Analyses of graft material in the CLTI group showed that, at 5 years, autologous vein grafts had better long-term patency rates than PTFE and HePTFE grafts. At 5 years, the primary and secondary patency rate for autologous vein grafts were 63.2% (P= 0.324) and 83.2% (P = 0.020), respectively. Freedom from MALE was 72.0% with the use of autologous vein grafts, 47.9% using PTFE and, 52.9% using HePTFE, respectively (P= 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that femoropopliteal bypass surgery in patients with TASC D lesions is safe and effective in the long term. Autologous vein grafts remain the first choice for patients with CLTI, also for bypasses in AK position. However, prosthetic grafts in AK the position are an acceptable alternative for revascularisation when the saphenous vein is not available.

Nonatheromatous Popliteal Artery Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is often caused by atherosclerosis. However, causes other than atherosclerosis is often overlooked. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES) and popliteal artery adventitial cystic disease (PACD) are two common nonatheromatous causes of claudication and critical limb ischemia. The purpose of this study is to present early results of treatment of PAES and PACD involving the lower limbs. METHODS: From December 2019 to February 2021, 10 patients with PAES underwent surgeries, and 1 patient with PAES received conservative treatment. 2 patients with PACD underwent surgery. Patient data including age, gender, etiology of vascular pathology, diseased vessel, surgical method, and hemodynamic status were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 5.64 ± 3.72 months (range, 1-12 months). All patients had their symptoms improved or resolved. The success rate of surgery was 100%, the rate of freedom from reintervention for any reason was 100%. There were no death, bleeding, embolism, or skin ulcers during late follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: PAES and PACD require early diagnosis and intervention, and early surgery may lead to good early- and mid-term results.

United States Investigational Device Exemption study of the Revolution Peripheral Atherectomy System.

OBJECTIVE: Atherectomy has become commonplace as an adjunct to interventional treatments for peripheral arterial disease, but the procedures have been complicated by risks including distal embolization and arterial perforation. This study aimed to examine the safety and effectiveness of a novel atherectomy system to treat femoropopliteal and below-knee peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: The Revolution Peripheral Atherectomy System (Rex Medical LP, Conshohocken, Pa) was studied in 121 patients with 148 femoropopliteal and below-knee lesions, enrolled at 17 United States institutions. Technical success was defined when the post-atherectomy angiographic stenosis was ≤50%, as assessed by an independent core laboratory. Major adverse events were adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee. RESULTS: Among 148 site-identified target lesions in 121 patients, 21.4% were in the superficial femoral artery, 13.7% involved the popliteal artery, and 67.9% were in tibial arteries; 3.1% involved more than one segment. Technical success was 90.2%, with stenoses decreasing from 73% ± 19% at baseline to 42% ± 14% after atherectomy. Adjunctive treatment after atherectomy included angioplasty with uncoated balloons in 91%, drug-coated balloons in 11%, bare stent deployment in 8%, and drug-eluting stent placement in 3%. Procedural success (<30% residual stenosis) was achieved in 93.7% of target lesions. Complications during the procedure included one target vessel perforation and two distal embolizations; each of which were adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee as unrelated to the device and were not visualized angiographically by the core laboratory. Freedom from major adverse events was 97.3% through 30 days. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency were 81.6%, 87.7%, and 91.6% at 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Revolution Peripheral Atherectomy System was associated with few procedural complications and a high rate of success at the index procedure and through 6 months.

Comparison of Prosthetic and Vein Bypass with Nitinol Stents in Long Femoropopliteal Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for the treatment of long femoropopliteal lesions are not based on a high level of evidence and recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) challenge vein bypass (VBP) as the recommended therapy. This study compared prosthetic (PTFE) bypass, VBP and angioplasty with nitinol stents in long femoropopliteal lesions. METHODS: Pooled data from a RCT and a retrospective database with the same inclusion criteria were analyzed with primary and secondary patency as well as freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) as primary endpoints. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2018 a total of 172 lesions were treated in three groups (PTFE: n = 62, VBP: n = 55, stent: n = 55). Clinical and lesion characteristics were similar with mean lesion lengths between 260 and 279mm. Technical success rate in the stent group was 87%. There were no significant differences between the groups in patency rates, freedom from TLR, limb salvage and survival during 2-year follow-up. The primary patency rates for the PTFE, VBP and stent groups were 50%, 56% and 60% at 2 years. The PTFE group had significantly less complications compared to the other groups and a shorter hospital-stay compared to the VBP group. Clinical improvement was significantly better in the PTFE and VBP group compared to the stent group. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year results indicate that the role of VBP as the recommended therapy for long femoropopliteal lesions may not be unchallenged due to the similar results in all three groups. Further RCTs are needed to determine the best revascularization modality for long femoropopliteal lesions.

Does aerobic fitness impact prolonged sitting-induced popliteal artery endothelial dysfunction?

PURPOSE: Acute prolonged bouts of sitting reduce popliteal artery blood flow and flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Individuals with higher aerobic fitness have enhanced popliteal FMD. Conflicting evidence regarding whether more aerobically fit individuals are protected from the negative impacts of sitting on popliteal endothelial function in male-dominated studies have been reported. We further explored the relationship between aerobic fitness and sitting-induced impairments in popliteal blood flow and FMD in a more sex-balanced cohort. METHODS: Relative peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak) was assessed using a cycling-based incremental test in 21 healthy adults (eight males; 23 ± 2 years; 23.9 ± 2.9 kg/m2). Popliteal blood flow and relative FMD (%) were measured via duplex ultrasonography before and after 3 h of uninterrupted sitting. Pearson correlations were performed separately between V̇O2peak versus pre-sitting and sitting-induced reductions in popliteal outcomes. RESULTS: Aerobic fitness (41.0 ± 9.7 ml/kg/min) was positively correlated with pre-sitting popliteal blood flow (65 ± 23 mL/min; R = 0.59, P = 0.005) and relative FMD (4.2 ± 1.5%; R = 0.49, P = 0.03). As expected, sitting reduced resting blood flow (19 ± 11 mL/min) and FMD (1.9 ± 0.7%) (both, P < 0.001). V̇O2peak was inversely related to sitting-induced declines in blood flow (Δ-46 ± 23 mL/min; R = - 0.71, P < 0.001) and FMD (Δ-2.4 ± 1.5%; R = - 0.51, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Although higher aerobic fitness was associated with more favorable popliteal endothelial-dependent vasodilator responses, it also corresponded with larger sitting-induced impairments in FMD. This suggests that being more aerobically fit does not protect against sitting-induced vascular endothelial dysfunction. As such, all young adults should minimize habitual prolonged sedentary bouts, regardless of their aerobic fitness level.

Towards a better understanding of the posttreatment hemodynamic behaviors in femoropopliteal arteries through personalized computational models based on OCT images.

The hemodynamic behavior following endovascular treatment of patients with peripheral arterial disease plays a significant role on the occurrence of restenosis in femoro-popliteal (FP) arteries. The atheroprone flow conditions that are generally accepted to promote restenosis can be calculated by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses, and these results can be used to assess individualized treatment outcomes. However, the impact of endovascular therapy on the flow behaviors of FP arteries are still poorly understood, as the imaging modalities used in existing numerical works (X-ray angiography, computed tomography angiography) are unable to accurately represent the post-treatment arterial geometry due to their low resolutions. Therefore, this study proposes a new algorithm that combines intra-arterial lumen geometry obtained from high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) images with centerlines generated from X-ray images to reconstruct the FP artery with an in-plane resolution of 10 µm. This superior accuracy allows modeling characteristic geometrical structures, such as angioplasty-induced arterial dissections, that are too small to be reconstructed with other imaging modalities. The framework is applied on the clinical data of patients treated either with only-percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) (n = 4) or PTA followed by stenting (n = 4). Based on the generated models, PTA was found to cause numerous arterial dissections, covering approximately 10% of the total surface area of the lumen, whereas no dissections were identified in the stented arteries. CFD simulations were performed to investigate the hemodynamic conditions before and after treatment. Regardless of the treatment method, the areas affected by low time-averaged wall shear stress (< 0.5 Pa) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) following endovascular therapy (pre-PTA: 0.95 ± 0.59 cm2; post-PTA: 2.10 ± 1.09cm2; post-stent: 3.10 ± 0.98 cm2). There were no statistical differences between the PTA and the stent groups. However, within the PTA group, adverse hemodynamics were mainly concentrated at regions created by arterial dissections, which may negatively impact the outcomes of a leave-nothing-behind strategy. These observations show that OCT-based numerical models have great potential to guide clinicians regarding the optimal treatment approach.

One-year outcomes of drug-coated balloon treatment for long femoropopliteal lesions: a multicentre cohort and real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have shown superiority in the endovascular treatment of short femoropopliteal artery disease. Few studies have focused on outcomes in long lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Orchid® DCBs in long lesions over 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: This study is a multicentre cohort and real-world study. The patients had lesions longer than or equal to 150 mm of the femoropopliteal artery and were revascularized with DCBs. The primary endpoints were primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months and major adverse events (all-cause death and major target limb amputation). The secondary endpoints were the changes in Rutherford classification and the ankle brachial index (ABI). RESULTS: One hundred fifteen lesions in 109 patients (mean age 67 ± 11 years, male proportion 71.6%) were included in this study. The mean lesion length was 252.3 ± 55.4 mm, and 78.3% of the lesions were chronic total occlusion (CTO). Primary patency by Kaplan-Meier estimation was 98.1% at 6 months and 82.1% at 12 months. The rate of freedom from TLR by Kaplan-Meier estimation was 88.4% through 12 months. There were no procedure- or device-related deaths through 12 months. The rate of all-cause death was 2.8%. Cox regression analysis suggested that renal failure and critical limb ischaemia (CLI) were statistically significant predictors of the primary patency endpoint. CONCLUSION: In our real-world study, DCBs were safe and effective when used in long femoropopliteal lesions, and the primary patency rate at 12 months by Kaplan-Meier estimation was 82.1%.