Gene fusions in poroma, porocarcinoma and related adnexal skin tumours: An update.

Poroma is a benign sweat gland tumour showing morphological features recapitulating the superficial portion of the eccrine sweat coil. A subset of poromas may transform into porocarcinoma, its malignant counterpart. Poroma and porocarcinoma are characterised by recurrent gene fusions involving YAP1, a transcriptional co-activator, which is controlled by the Hippo signalling pathway. The fusion genes frequently involve MAML2 and NUTM1, which are also rearranged in other cutaneous and extracutaneous neoplasms. We aimed to review the clinical, morphological and molecular features of this category of adnexal neoplasms with a special focus upon emerging differential diagnoses, and discuss how their systematic molecular characterisation may contribute to a standardisation of diagnosis, more accurate classification and, ultimately, refinement of their prognosis and therapeutic modalities.

Cuticular Poroma: A Rare Poroma Variant Simulating a Malignant Neoplasm That Often Harbors YAP1::NUTM1 Fusions Similar to Their Conventional Counterparts.

ABSTRACT: Cuticular poroma is a rare variant of poroma composed of exclusively or predominantly cuticular cells, namely of large cells with ample eosinophilic cytoplasm. We report 7 cases of this rare tumor identified among 426 neoplasms diagnosed as poroma or porocarcinoma. The patients were 4 males and 3 females, ranging in age from 18 to 88 years. All presented with a solitary asymptomatic nodule. The location included knee (2 cases), shoulder, thigh, shin, lower arm, and neck (each 1). All lesions were surgically removed. No evidence of disease was observed in 5 patients with available follow-up (range 12-124 months).Microscopically, all neoplasms were composed of variably sized, focally closed packed, or interconnecting nodules constituted mostly of cuticular cells. Small poroid cells were a focal feature in 5 tumors, whereas in the remaining 2 cases, poroid cells with conspicuous but still in minority. Five neoplasms were somewhat asymmetric, with irregular outlines. Ductal differentiation and intracytoplasmic vacuoles were seen in 6 tumors. Other features variably encountered were conspicuous intranuclear pseudoinclusions, cystic change, occasional multinucleated cells, increased mitoses, and stromal desmoplasia. Four of the 5 tumors analyzed with next-generation sequencing yielded YAP1::NUTM1 fusions. In addition, various mutations, mostly of unknown significance were identified in one neoplasm.

Recurrent PAK2 rearrangements in poroma with folliculo-sebaceous differentiation.

AIMS: Poroma is a benign adnexal neoplasm with differentiation towards the upper portion of the sweat gland apparatus. In 2019, Sekine et al. demonstrated recurrent YAP1::MAML2 and YAP1::NUTM1 fusion in poroma and porocarcinoma. Follicular, sebaceous and/or apocrine differentiation has been reported in rare cases of poroma and whether these tumours constitute a variant of poroma or represent a distinctive tumour is a matter to debate. Herein we describe the clinical, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of 13 cases of poroma with folliculo-sebaceous differentiation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Most of the tumours were located on the head and neck region (n = 7), and on the thigh (n = 3). All presented were adults with a slight male predilection. The median tumour size was 10 mm (range: 4-25). Microscopically, lesions displayed features of poroma with nodules of monotonous basophilic cells associated with a second population of larger eosinophilic cells. In all cases, ducts and scattered sebocytes were identified. Infundibular cysts were present in 10 cases. In two cases high mitotic activity was noted, and in three cases cytologic atypia and areas of necrosis were identified. Whole transcriptome RNA sequencing demonstrated in-frame fusion transcripts involving RNF13::PAK2 (n = 4), EPHB3::PAK2 (n = 2), DLG1::PAK2 (n = 2), LRIG1::PAK2 (n = 1), ATP1B3::PAK2 (n = 1), TM9SF4::PAK2 (n = 1), and CTNNA1::PAK2 (n = 1). Moreover, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis revealed PAK2 rearrangement in an additional case. No YAP1::MAML2 or YAP1::NUTM1 fusion was detected. CONCLUSION: Recurrent fusions involving the PAK2 gene in all analysed poroma with folliculo-sebaceous differentiation in this study confirms that this neoplasm represents a separate tumour entity distinct from YAP1::MAML2 or YAP1::NUTM1 rearranged poromas.

Distinct regulations driving YAP1 expression loss in poroma, porocarcinoma and RB1-deficient skin carcinoma.

AIMS: Recently, YAP1 fusion genes have been demonstrated in eccrine poroma and porocarcinoma, and the diagnostic use of YAP1 immunohistochemistry has been highlighted in this setting. In other organs, loss of YAP1 expression can reflect YAP1 rearrangement or transcriptional repression, notably through RB1 inactivation. In this context, our objective was to re-evaluate the performance of YAP1 immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of poroma and porocarcinoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: The expression of the C-terminal part of the YAP1 protein was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 543 cutaneous epithelial tumours, including 27 poromas, 14 porocarcinomas and 502 other cutaneous tumours. Tumours that showed a lack of expression of YAP1 were further investigated for Rb by immunohistochemistry and for fusion transcripts by real-time PCR (YAP1::MAML2 and YAP1::NUTM1). The absence of YAP1 expression was observed in 24 cases of poroma (89%), 10 porocarcinoma (72%), 162 Merkel cell carcinoma (98%), 14 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (15%), one trichoblastoma and one sebaceoma. Fusions of YAP1 were detected in only 16 cases of poroma (n = 66%), 10 porocarcinoma (71%) all lacking YAP1 expression, and in one sebaceoma. The loss of Rb expression was detected in all cases except one of YAP1-deficient SCC (n = 14), such tumours showing significant morphological overlap with porocarcinoma. In-vitro experiments in HaCat cells showed that RB1 knockdown resulted in repression of YAP1 protein expression. CONCLUSION: In addition to gene fusion, we report that transcriptional repression of YAP1 can be observed in skin tumours with RB1 inactivation, including MCC and a subset of SCC.

Poroid adnexal skin tumors with YAP1 fusions exhibit similar histopathologic features: A series of six YAP1-rearranged adnexal skin tumors.

BACKGROUND: Adnexal skin tumors are diagnostically challenging with few known molecular signatures. Recently, however, YAP1-MAML2 and YAP1-NUTM1 fusions were identified in poroid adnexal skin tumors. METHODS: Herein, we subjected eight poroid adnexal skin tumors (three poromas and five porocarcinomas) to fusion gene analysis by whole transcriptome sequencing and next-generation DNA sequencing analysis. RESULTS: YAP1 fusions were identified in six cases. YAP1-NUTM1 fusions were identified in two poromas and three porocarcinomas. A single case of porocarcinoma harbored a YAP1-MAML2 fusion. Two cases were negative for gene fusion. All cases that harbored YAP1-NUTM1 fusions showed nuclear protein in testis (NUT) expression by immunohistochemistry, with NUT being negative in the YAP1-MAML2-positive case. In this case series, we provide a detailed histopathologic description of six YAP1-fused poroid skin tumors, which we show harbor reproducible histopathologic features, to include broad, bulbous tumor tongues with admixtures of basaloid, poroid cells punctuated by squamatized cuticles and ductules, with uniform tumor nuclei featuring frequent grooves and pseudonuclear inclusions. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the characteristic histopathologic features of YAP1-fused poroid adnexal skin tumor is a step toward a more reproducible classification of adnexal skin tumors as well as a step toward targeted therapy for metastatic and/or unresectable examples of this poroid group of neoplasms.

NUT Is a Specific Immunohistochemical Marker for the Diagnosis of YAP1-NUTM1-rearranged Cutaneous Poroid Neoplasms.

YAP1-NUTM1 fusion transcripts have been recently reported in poroma and porocarcinoma. NUTM1 translocation can be screened by nuclear protein in testis (NUT) immunohistochemistry in various malignancies, but its diagnostic performance has not been thoroughly validated on a large cohort of cutaneous epithelial neoplasms. We have evaluated NUT immunohistochemical expression in a large cohort encompassing 835 cases of various cutaneous epidermal or adnexal epithelial neoplasms. NUT expression was specific to eccrine poromas and porocarcinoma, with 32% of cases showing NUT expression. All other cutaneous tumors tested lacked NUT expression, including mimickers such as seborrheic keratosis, Bowen disease, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, nodular hidradenoma, and all other adnexal tumors tested. Remarkably, NUT expression was more frequent in a distinct morphologic subgroup. Indeed, 93% of poroid hidradenoma (dermal/subcutaneous nodular poroma, 13/14) and 80% of poroid hidradenocarcinoma cases (malignant poroid hidradenoma, 4/5) showed NUT expression, in contrast to 17% and 11% of classic poroma (4/23) and porocarcinoma cases (4/35), respectively. RNA sequencing of 12 NUT-positive neoplasms further confirmed the presence of a YAP1-NUTM1 fusion transcript in all cases, and also an EMC7-NUTM1 gene fusion in a single case. In the setting of a cutaneous adnexal neoplasm, nuclear expression of NUT accurately and specifically diagnosed a specific subgroup of benign and malignant poroid tumors, all associated with a NUTM1 fusion, which frequently harbored a poroid hidradenoma morphology.

Recurrent YAP1-MAML2 and YAP1-NUTM1 fusions in poroma and porocarcinoma.

Poroma is a benign skin tumor exhibiting terminal sweat gland duct differentiation. The present study aimed to explore the potential role of gene fusions in the tumorigenesis of poromas. RNA sequencing and reverse transcription PCR identified highly recurrent YAP1-MAML2 and YAP1-NUTM1 fusions in poromas (92/104 lesions, 88.5%) and their rare malignant counterpart, porocarcinomas (7/11 lesions, 63.6%). A WWTR1-NUTM1 fusion was identified in a single lesion of poroma. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization confirmed genomic rearrangements involving these genetic loci. Immunohistochemical staining could readily identify the YAP1 fusion products as nuclear expression of the N-terminal portion of YAP1 with a lack of the C-terminal portion. YAP1 and WWTR1, also known as YAP and TAZ, respectively, encode paralogous transcriptional activators of TEAD, which are negatively regulated by the Hippo signaling pathway. The YAP1 and WWTR1 fusions strongly transactivated a TEAD reporter and promoted anchorage-independent growth, confirming their tumorigenic roles. Our results demonstrate the frequent presence of transforming YAP1 fusions in poromas and porocarcinomas and suggest YAP1/TEAD-dependent transcription as a candidate therapeutic target against porocarcinoma.

Targeted molecular profiling reveals genetic heterogeneity of poromas and porocarcinomas.

The genetic landscape of rare benign tumours and their malignant counterparts is still largely unexplored. While recent work showed that mutant HRAS is present in subsets of poromas and porocarcinomas, a more comprehensive genetic view on these rare adnexal neoplasms is lacking. Using high-coverage next generation sequencing, we investigated the mutational profile of 50 cancer-related genes in 12 cases (six poromas and six porocarcinomas). Non-synonymous mutations were found in two-thirds of both poromas and porocarcinomas. Hotspot HRAS mutations were identified in two poromas (p.G13R and p.Q61R) and one porocarcinoma (p.G13C). While in poromas only few cases showed single mutated genes, porocarcinomas showed greater genetic heterogeneity with up to six mutated genes per case. Recurrent TP53 mutations were found in all porocarcinomas that harboured mutated genes. Non-recurrent mutations in porocarcinomas were found in several additional tumour suppressors (RB1, APC, CDKN2A, and PTEN), and genes implicated in PI3K-AKT and MAPK signalling pathways (ABL1, PDGFRA, PIK3CA, HRAS, and RET). UV-associated mutations were found in TP53, APC, CDKN2A, PTEN, and RET. In conclusion, our study confirms and extends the spectrum of genetic lesions in poromas and porocarcinomas. While poromas exhibited only few mutations, which did not involve TP53, the majority of porocarcinomas harboured UV-mediated mutations in TP53 with some of these cases showing considerable genetic heterogeneity that may be clinically exploitable.