Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 61
Filter
1.
J Headache Pain ; 25(1): 56, 2024 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627631

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE-3) inhibition have been implicated in the neurobiologic underpinnings of migraine. Considering the clinical similarities between migraine and persistent post-traumatic headache (PPTH), we aimed to ascertain whether PDE-3 inhibition can elicit migraine-like headache in persons with PPTH. METHODS: We tested cilostazol, which inhibits PDE-3, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study involving persons with PPTH attributed to mild traumatic brain injury. The randomized participants were allocated to receive oral administration of either 200-mg cilostazol or placebo (calcium tablet) on two separate experiment days. The primary end point was the incidence of migraine-like headache during a 12-hour observation window post-ingestion. The secondary endpoint was the area under the curve (AUC) for reported headache intensity scores during the same observation window. RESULTS: Twenty-one persons underwent randomization and completed both experiment days. The mean participants' age was 41.4 years, and most (n = 17) were females. During the 12-hour observation window, 14 (67%) of 21 participants developed migraine-like headache post-cilostazol, in contrast to three (14%) participants after placebo (P =.003). The headache intensity scores were higher post-cilostazol than after placebo (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide novel evidence showing that PDE-3 inhibition can elicit migraine-like headache in persons with PPTH. Given that PDE-3 inhibition increases intracellular cAMP levels, our findings allude to the potential therapeutic value of targeting cAMP-dependent signaling pathways in the management of PPTH. Further investigations are imperative to substantiate these insights and delineate the importance of cAMP-dependent signaling pathways in the neurobiologic mechanisms underlying PPTH. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT05595993.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Post-Traumatic Headache , Tension-Type Headache , Female , Humans , Adult , Male , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Post-Traumatic Headache/etiology , Cilostazol/pharmacology , Cilostazol/therapeutic use , Cross-Over Studies , Headache , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method
2.
Brain ; 147(4): 1312-1320, 2024 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37864847

ABSTRACT

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP-38), known for its role in migraine pathogenesis, has been identified as a novel drug target. Given the clinical parallels between post-traumatic headache (PTH) and migraine, we explored the possible role of PACAP-38 in the pathogenesis of PTH. To this end, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover trial involving adult participants diagnosed with persistent PTH resulting from mild traumatic brain injury. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a 20-min continuous intravenous infusion of either PACAP-38 (10 pmol/kg/min) or placebo (isotonic saline) on two separate experimental days, with a 1-week washout period in between. The primary outcome was the difference in incidence of migraine-like headache between PACAP-38 and placebo during a 12-h observational period post-infusion. The secondary outcome was the difference in the area under the curve (AUC) for baseline-corrected median headache intensity scores during the same 12-h observational period. Of 49 individuals assessed for eligibility, 21 were enrolled and completed the trial. The participants had a mean age of 35.2 years, and 16 (76%) were female. Most [19 of 21 (90%)] had a migraine-like phenotype. During the 12-h observational period, 20 of 21 (95%) participants developed migraine-like headache after intravenous infusion of PACAP-38, compared with two (10%) participants after placebo (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the baseline-corrected AUC values for median headache intensity scores during the 12-h observational period was higher after PACAP-38 than placebo (P < 0.001). These compelling results demonstrate that PACAP-38 is potent inducer of migraine-like headache in people with persistent PTH. Thus, targeting PACAP-38 signalling might be a promising avenue for the treatment of PTH.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Post-Traumatic Headache , Adult , Humans , Female , Male , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Post-Traumatic Headache/diagnosis , Post-Traumatic Headache/etiology , Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide/therapeutic use , Headache/etiology , Headache/complications , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Migraine Disorders/complications , Double-Blind Method
3.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 28(4): 205-210, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38133705

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We evaluate evidence-based treatments for posttraumatic headache (PTH), a secondary headache disorder resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI), comprising nearly 4% of all symptomatic headache disorders. Utilizing recent publications, we aim to inform clinicians of current treatment methods. RECENT FINDINGS: There is limited research on PTH treatment. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of metoclopramide with diphenhydramine for acute PTH found that the treatment group (N = 81) experienced more significant pain improvement than placebo by 1.4 points. For persistent PTH, an open-label study of erenumab (N = 89) found that 28% of participants reported ≥ 50% reduction in moderate-to-severe headache days, but an RCT of fremanezumab showed a non-significant reduction in moderate-to-severe headache days. A randomized crossover study of 40 patients with persistent PTH found that onabotulinum toxin-A decreased cumulative number of headaches/week by 43.3% in the treatment group and increased by 35.1% among placebos. In a study of military veterans with severe posttraumatic stress disorder and persistent/delayed onset PTH (N = 193), patients who received Cognitive Behavioral Therapy reported significant improvements in headache-related disability compared to usual care (aggregate mean HIT-6, -3.4). A transcranial magnetic stimulation (N = 24) study found that 58% of participants with mild TBI-related headache experienced a 50% reduction in headache frequency. New studies indicate promise in improving clinically important outcomes of PTH. However, more research is necessary to determine the optimal treatment and whether combining pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment versus a single modality is more effective.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion , Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Post-Traumatic Headache , Humans , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Post-Traumatic Headache/complications , Headache/complications , Brain Concussion/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Pain/complications , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
4.
Cephalalgia ; 43(11): 3331024231210930, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37917826

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether levcromakalim (a KATP channel opener) induces migraine-like headache in people with persistent post-traumatic headache who had no known history of migraine. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover trial, participants were randomly assigned to receive a 20-minute continuous intravenous infusion of levcromakalim (50 µg/mL) or placebo (isotonic saline) on two separate experimental days with a 1-week wash-out period in between. The primary endpoint was the difference in incidence of migraine-like headache between levcromakalim and placebo during a 12-hour observational period after infusion start. The secondary endpoint was the difference in area under the curve for baseline-corrected median headache intensity scores between levcromakalim and placebo during the 12-hour observational period. RESULTS: A total of 21 participants with persistent post-traumatic headache were randomized and completed the trial. During the 12-hour observational period, 12 (57%) of 21 participants reported experiencing migraine-like headache following the levcromakalim infusion, compared with three after placebo (P = 0.013). Moreover, the baseline-corrected median headache intensity scores were higher following the levcromakalim infusion than after placebo (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that KATP channels play an important role in the pathogenesis of migraine-like headache in people with persistent post-traumatic headache. This implies that KATP channel blockers might represent a promising avenue for drug development. Further research is warranted to explore the potential therapeutic benefits of KATP channel blockers in managing post-traumatic headache.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05243953.


Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity , Migraine Disorders , Post-Traumatic Headache , Tension-Type Headache , Humans , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Post-Traumatic Headache/etiology , Cromakalim/adverse effects , KATP Channels , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Headache , Double-Blind Method , Adenosine Triphosphate
5.
Pain Physician ; 25(6): 459-470, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36122255

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cervicogenic headache (CGH) can often be difficult to treat, given the overlapping clinical features of other headaches and the varying sources of pain that patients report. While imaging is not useful in diagnosing CGH, anesthetic blockade of the atlanto-occipital joint, lateral atlantoaxial joint, or specific cervical zygapophyseal joints can be used to confirm the diagnosis. When conservative treatment measures, such as physical therapy, fail, interventional techniques, such as intraarticular steroid injections, have been shown in observational studies to provide relief in some patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of intraarticular cervical facet steroid injections in the treatment of CGH. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials , Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus with Full Text, Scopus, and the Web of Science platform, from inception to April 2021, for studies using intraarticular cervical facet injections to treat CGH in adults aged 18 or older. Primary outcomes included mean postinjection pain scores. Outcomes were pooled using a random effects model and reported as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Three studies with a total of 64 patients met the inclusion criteria. According to data from each of the included studies, intraarticular cervical facet injections were shown to demonstrate improvement in the mean pain score from baseline to postintervention. The overall effect size-pooled MD in the Visual Analog Scale score-was 3.299 (95% CI: 2.045 to 4.552, P < 0.001). Heterogeneity (I2) was 36.11%. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, lack of control group, and varying pain generators and interventional technique between studies contribute to the limitations of the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that therapeutic intraarticular cervical facet injections may be effective in the treatment of CGH. Because of the heterogeneity among the studies, these results should be interpreted with caution.


Subject(s)
Post-Traumatic Headache , Zygapophyseal Joint , Adult , Headache , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular/methods , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Steroids/therapeutic use
6.
Cephalalgia ; 42(11-12): 1194-1206, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35546268

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Investigation of onabotulinumtoxinA in a murine model of acute and persistent post-traumatic headache. METHODS: Mild traumatic brain injury was induced with a weight drop method. Periorbital and hindpaw cutaneous allodynia were measured for 14 days. Mice were then exposed to bright light stress and allodynia was reassessed. OnabotulinumtoxinA (0.5 U) was injected subcutaneously over the cranial sutures at different post-injury time points. RESULTS: After milt traumatic brain injury, mice exhibited periorbital and hindpaw allodynia that lasted for approximately 14 days. Allodynia could be reinstated on days 14-67 by exposure to stress only in previously injured mice. OnabotulinumtoxinA administration at 2 h after mild traumatic brain injury fully blocked both transient acute and stress-induced allodynia up to day 67. When administered 72 h post-mild traumatic brain injury, onabotulinumtoxinA reversed acute allodynia, but only partially prevented stress-induced allodynia. OnabotulinumtoxinA administration at day 12, when initial allodynia was largely resolved, produced incomplete and transient prevention of stress-induced allodynia. The degree of acute allodynia correlated positively with subsequent stress-induced allodynia. CONCLUSION: Mild traumatic brain injury induced transient headache-like pain followed by long lasting sensitization and persistent vulnerability to a normally innocuous stress stimulus, respectively modeling acute and persistent post-traumatic headache.. Administration of onabotulinumtoxinA following the resolution of acute post-traumatic headache diminished persistent post-traumatic headache but the effects were transient, suggesting that underlying persistent mild traumatic brain injury-induced maladaptations were not reversed. In contrast, early onabotulinumtoxinA administration fully blocked both acute post-traumatic headache as well as the transition to persistent post-traumatic headache suggesting prevention of neural adaptations that promote vulnerability to headache-like pain. Additionally, the degree of acute post-traumatic headache was predictive of risk of persistent post-traumatic headache.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Brain Concussion , Post-Traumatic Headache , Tension-Type Headache , Animals , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Brain Concussion/drug therapy , Headache/drug therapy , Hyperalgesia/drug therapy , Hyperalgesia/etiology , Mice , Pain/drug therapy , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Post-Traumatic Headache/etiology , Tension-Type Headache/drug therapy
7.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep ; 22(2): 105-111, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35138589

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Post-traumatic headache is a common sequela of injury to the head and/or neck. Here, we review the current approach to pharmacologic management of post-traumatic headache and explore the therapeutic promise of targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide signaling to address unmet treatment needs. RECENT FINDINGS: The scarcity of data from controlled trials has left clinicians to rely on mainly expert opinion for the pharmacologic management of post-traumatic headache. The current view is that a phenotype-guided approach should be used, in which patients are treated according to the primary headache phenotype that their clinical features resemble the most (e.g. migraine, tension-type headache). Moreover, incremental advances are being made in the field that aim to identify possible cellular and molecular drivers of headache persistence. Calcitonin gene-related peptide has emerged as a key drug target which, in turn, has prompted novel insights on the potential importance of early initiation of pharmacologic treatment following the onset of post-traumatic headache. This, in turn, might prevent subsequent persistence and chronification of headache.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Post-Traumatic Headache , Tension-Type Headache , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide , Headache , Humans , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Migraine Disorders/etiology , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Post-Traumatic Headache/etiology
8.
Cells ; 12(1)2022 12 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36611947

ABSTRACT

Posttraumatic headache (PTH) attributed to traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a secondary headache developed within 7 days after head injury, and in a substantial number of patients PTH becomes chronic and lasts for more than 3 months. Current medications are almost entirely relied on the treatment of primary headache such as migraine, due to its migraine-like phenotype and the limited understanding on the PTH pathogenic mechanisms. To this end, increasing preclinical studies have been conducted in the last decade. We focus in this review on the trigeminovascular system from the animal studies since it provides the primary nociceptive sensory afferents innervating the head and face region, and the pathological changes in the trigeminal pathway are thought to play a key role in the development of PTH. In addition to the pathologies, PTH-like behaviors induced by TBI and further exacerbated by nitroglycerin, a general headache inducer through vasodilation are reviewed. We will overview the current pharmacotherapies including calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody and sumatriptan in the PTH animal models. Given that modulation of the endocannabinoid (eCB) system has been well-documented in the treatment of migraine and TBI, the therapeutic potential of eCB in PTH will also be discussed.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Migraine Disorders , Post-Traumatic Headache , Animals , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Post-Traumatic Headache/chemically induced , Headache , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide/metabolism , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/drug therapy
9.
Scand J Pain ; 21(4): 635-652, 2021 10 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34090319

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The pathogeneses of chronic tension-type headache (CTTH) and cervicogenic headache (CEH) are not well established. Peripheral activation or sensitization of myofascial nociceptors is suggested as a potential mechanism and injections of botulinum toxin (BONTA) have thus been used in the treatment for both headache conditions. BONTA inhibits the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction and inhibits contraction of skeletal muscles. If the pain is precipitated by increased tone in cervical muscles, local injections of BONTA could represent a prophylactic measure. However, the treatment is still controversial, and a thorough assessment of the current evidence is required. This review aims to assess the evidence of BONTA injection as a prophylactic treatment for CTTH and CEH by reviewing and examining the quality of placebo-controlled, randomized trials. METHODS: Data sources: we searched in the following databases: PubMed (including Medline), Embase, Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials, Cinahl, Amed, SCOPUS and Google Scholar including other repository sources. Both MeSH and free keywords were used in conducting the systematic search in the databases. The search covered publications from the root of the databases to November 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The review included RCTs, comparing single treatment of BONTA with placebo on patients with CTTH or CEH above 18 years of age, by measuring pain severity/relief or headache frequency. DATA EXTRACTION: The following data were extracted: year of publication, country, setting, trial design, number of participants, injection procedure, BONTA dosages, and clinical outcome measures. STUDY APPRAISAL: To assess validity and quality, and risk of bias, the Oxford Pain Validity Scale, Modified Jadad Scale, last version of Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias (RoB 2), and the CONSORT 2010 Checklist were used. The trials were assessed, and quality scored independently by two of the reviewers. A quantitative synthesis and meta-analyses of headache frequency and intensity were performed. RESULTS: We extracted 16 trials, 12 on prophylactic BONTA treatment for CTTH and four on CEH. Of these 12 trials (8 on CTTH and 4 on CEH) were included in the quantitative synthesis. A majority of the trials found no significant difference on the primary outcome measure when BONTA treatment was compared with placebo. Three "positive" trials, reporting significant difference in favor of BONTA treatment, but two of these were hampered by low validity and quality scores and high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear clinical evidence supporting prophylactic treatment with BONTA for CTTH or CEH.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Headache Disorders , Post-Traumatic Headache , Tension-Type Headache , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Headache/drug therapy , Headache Disorders/drug therapy , Humans , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Tension-Type Headache/drug therapy
10.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 25(8): 52, 2021 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34125320

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the treatment of post-traumatic headache (PTH) and how to choose pharmacotherapy based upon known pathophysiology. RECENT FINDINGS: Preclinical models of traumatic brain injury are finally revealing some of the mechanisms of PTH, including the significant role that inflammatory neuropeptides like calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) play in the initiation and persistence of symptoms. To effectively treat post-traumatic headache (PTH), one needs to understand the pathophysiology behind the initiation and persistence of symptoms. Recent animal models are starting to elucidate these mechanisms, but effective treatment will also likely rely on the identification of patients who are most at risk for persistent PTH. Trials of early, targeted therapy for at-risk patients will be needed to validate these hypotheses. Additionally, high powered clinical trials are lacking in the field of persistent PTH for medications that are known to be effective in primary headache disorders. Effective treatment for persistent PTH also requires understanding how headache interacts with the complex nature of persistent post-concussion symptoms, as this disease often necessitates a multi-disciplinary approach. Regardless, with the knowledge gained by new PTH models cited in this paper, and an increasing availability of novel headache medications, more effective treatment models are on the horizon.


Subject(s)
Post-Traumatic Headache/therapy , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Post-Traumatic Headache/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
11.
Neurology ; 96(18): e2323-e2331, 2021 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33762421

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether IV metoclopramide 20 mg + diphenhydramine 25 mg (M + D) was more efficacious than IV placebo for acute moderate or severe posttraumatic headache in the emergency room. METHODS: We conducted this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in 2 urban emergency departments (EDs). Participants who experienced head trauma and presented to our EDs within 10 days with a headache fulfilling criteria for acute posttraumatic headache were included. We randomized participants in a 1:1 ratio to M + D or placebo. Participants, caregivers, and outcome assessors were blinded to assignment. The primary outcome was improvement in pain on a scale of 0 to 10 between baseline and 1 hour after treatment. RESULTS: This study was completed between August 2017 and March 2020. We screened 414 patients for participation and randomized 160: 81 to M + D and 79 to placebo. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. All enrolled participants provided primary outcome data. Patients receiving placebo reported mean improvement of 3.8 (SD 2.6), while those receiving M + D improved by 5.2 (SD 2.3), for a difference favoring metoclopramide of 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-2.2, p < 0.01). Adverse events were reported by 35 of 81 (43%) patients who received metoclopramide and 22 of 79 (28%) of patients who received placebo (95% CI 1-30 for difference of 15%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: M + D was more efficacious than placebo with regard to relief of posttraumatic headache in the ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03220958. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with acute moderate or severe posttraumatic headache, IV M + D significantly improved pain compared to placebo.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/drug therapy , Diphenhydramine/administration & dosage , Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Metoclopramide/administration & dosage , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Administration, Intravenous , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Emergency Service, Hospital/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Pain Measurement/methods , Post-Traumatic Headache/diagnosis
12.
Cephalalgia ; 41(6): 749-759, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33615840

ABSTRACT

AIM: Determine the role of calcitonin-gene related peptide in promoting post-traumatic headache and dysregulation of central pain modulation induced by mild traumatic brain injury in mice. METHODS: Mild traumatic brain injury was induced in lightly anesthetized male C57BL/6J mice by a weight drop onto a closed and unfixed skull, which allowed free head rotation after the impact. We first determined possible alterations in the diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, a measure of net descending pain inhibition called conditioned pain modulation in humans at day 2 following mild traumatic brain injury. Diffuse noxious inhibitory control was assessed as the latency to a thermally induced tail-flick that served as the test stimulus in the presence of right forepaw capsaicin injection that provided the conditioning stimulus. Post-traumatic headache-like behaviors were assessed by the development of cutaneous allodynia in the periorbital and hindpaw regions after mild traumatic brain injury. We then determined if intraperitoneal fremanezumab, an anti-calcitonin-gene related peptide monoclonal antibody or vehicle administered 2 h after sham or mild traumatic brain injury induction could alter cutaneous allodynia or diffuse noxious inhibitory control responses on day 2 post mild traumatic brain injury. RESULTS: In naïve and sham mice, capsaicin injection into the forepaw elevated the latency to tail-flick, reflecting the antinociceptive diffuse noxious inhibitory control response. Periorbital and hindpaw cutaneous allodynia, as well as a loss of diffuse noxious inhibitory control, was observed in mice 2 days after mild traumatic brain injury. Systemic treatment with fremanezumab blocked mild traumatic brain injury-induced cutaneous allodynia and prevented the loss of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in mice subjected to a mild traumatic brain injury. INTERPRETATION: Sequestration of calcitonin-gene related peptide in the initial stages following mild traumatic brain injury blocked the acute allodynia that may reflect mild traumatic brain injury-related post-traumatic headache and, additionally, prevented the loss of net descending inhibition within central pain modulation pathways. As loss of conditioned pain modulation has been linked to multiple persistent pain conditions, dysregulation of descending modulatory pathways may contribute to the persistence of post-traumatic headache. Additionally, evaluation of the conditioned pain modulation/diffuse noxious inhibitory controls response may serve as a biomarker of vulnerability for chronic/persistent pain. These findings suggest that early anti-calcitonin-gene related peptide intervention has the potential to be effective both for the treatment of mild traumatic brain injury-induced post-traumatic headache, as well as inhibiting mechanisms that may promote post-traumatic headache persistence.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide/pharmacology , Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control/drug effects , Neuralgia , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Calcitonin , Capsaicin/pharmacology , Chronic Pain , Disease Models, Animal , Hyperalgesia/etiology , Hyperalgesia/prevention & control , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL
13.
Mil Med ; 186(5-6): 493-499, 2021 05 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33241323

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) is an approved treatment for chronic migraine and has been shown to be effective in reducing number, days, and severity of headache in other headache disorders. Whether botulinum toxin is a safe and effective treatment specifically for post-traumatic headache (PTH), however, is unknown. This study sought to determine whether treatment with BoNT/A improved symptoms of PTH in military veterans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty subjects with PTH were randomized to receive treatment of either BoNT/A or a saline placebo. Sixteen weeks post-treatment or at return to baseline headache severity, subjects were crossed over to receive treatment with the other medication than previously treated with in the first session. Subjects recorded number of headaches, number of headache days, and headache pain severity in daily diaries. Outcome measures included change in the weekly number of headaches, number of headache days per week, and headache pain severity compared to baseline, and the change in number of headaches and number of headaches days at baseline compared to the rating scores averaged across weeks 6-11. RESULTS: The number of headaches per week significantly decreased by 2.24 (43.3%) with BoNT/A treatment (P < .001) and significantly increased by 1.28 (35.1%) with placebo (P = .02) at the end of the 16 weeks and the difference between groups was also significant (P < .001). The number of headache days per week also significantly decreased by 2.24 (44.4%) at the end of 16 weeks with BoNT/A treatment (P < .001), was not significantly changed with placebo, and the difference between the two groups was significant (P < .001). Both the change in number of headaches and number of headache days averaged across weeks 6-11 compared to baseline were significantly decreased in the BoNT/A group (1.6 and 1.4, respectively) compared to a significant increase of 0.3 in number of weekly headaches and a nonsignificant decrease of 0.1 in number of headache days for the placebo group (P = .048 and P = .005, respectively). Headache pain severity was significantly reduced by 0.06 with botulinum toxin treatment (P = .02) and was not significantly increased by 0.04 in the placebo group with a significant difference between groups (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with BoNT/A clinically and significantly improved the frequency and pain severity of PTH compared to placebo in military veterans. Limitations of the study include subject dropout, adherence to documenting variables daily in the dairy, and only one treatment of BoNT/A. Strengths include the cross-over study design, which demonstrated that BoNT/A was effective regardless of treatment order. This dataset is the first prospective study to evaluate BoNT/A as an intervention for symptoms of PTH and provides evidence that larger-scale and multiple treatment studies evaluating BoNT/A for this headache type are warranted.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Neuromuscular Agents , Post-Traumatic Headache , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Neuromuscular Agents/therapeutic use , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
15.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(51): e23852, 2020 Dec 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33371169

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Herbal medicines are empirically used to treat cervicogenic dizziness. However, till date there have been no systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these medicines. Therefore, this study protocol describes the methods for evaluating the efficacy and safety of herbal medicine for cervicogenic dizziness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The following electronic academic databases will be searched up to December 2019 without language or publication status restrictions: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), together with Korean, Chinese, and Japanese databases. Any randomized controlled trials related to herbal medicine for cervicogenic dizziness will be included. The functional outcomes and the vertebrobasilar artery hemodynamic states will be evaluated as primary outcomes. The total effective rate, hematological conditions, and adverse events will be assessed as secondary outcomes. Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment of studies, and qualitative evaluation of clinical evidence will be performed by 2 independent reviewers. The methodological quality of the included studies will be evaluated using a revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The strength of evidence from the included data will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Data synthesis will be performed as either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model using Review Manager software version 5.3. The results will be reported as a risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes and as a mean difference or standardized mean difference for continuous outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required since the individual clinical information of the patient is not used. The findings of this systematic review will be disseminated through the peer-reviewed publications or conference presentations. REVIEW REGISTRY UNIQUE IDENTIFYING NUMBER: reviewregistry1036.


Subject(s)
Clinical Protocols , Dizziness/drug therapy , Herbal Medicine/standards , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Herbal Medicine/methods , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Phytotherapy/methods , Phytotherapy/standards , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Treatment Outcome
16.
J Headache Pain ; 21(1): 62, 2020 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32493206

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has recently been implicated in the pathogenesis of post-traumatic headache (PTH), which raises the prospect for therapeutic use of monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP or its receptor. Therefore, we decided to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of erenumab for prevention of persistent PTH attributed to mild traumatic brain injury. METHODS: A single-center, non-randomized, single-arm, open-label study of erenumab for adults aged 18-65 years with persistent PTH. Patients were assigned to receive 140-mg erenumab monthly by two subcutaneous 1-mL injections, given every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in number of monthly headache days of moderate to severe intensity from baseline (4-week pretreatment period) to week 9 through 12. Tolerability and safety endpoints were adverse events (i.e. number and type). RESULTS: Eighty-nine of 100 patients completed the open-label trial. At baseline, the mean monthly number of headache days of moderate to severe intensity was 15.7. By week 9 through 12, the number was reduced by 2.8 days. The most common adverse events were constipation (n = 30) and injection-site reactions (n = 15). Of 100 patients who received at least one dose of erenumab, two patients discontinued the treatment regimen due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with persistent PTH, erenumab resulted in a lower frequency of moderate to severe headache days in this 12-week open-label trial. In addition, erenumab was well-tolerated as discontinuations due to adverse events were low. Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials are needed to adequately evaluate the efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with persistent PTH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03974360. Registered on April 17, 2019 - Retrospectively registered.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/drug therapy , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Post-Traumatic Headache/diagnosis , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Brain Concussion/complications , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Middle Aged , Post-Traumatic Headache/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
17.
Scand J Pain ; 20(1): 39-50, 2019 12 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31675351

ABSTRACT

Background and aims Cervicogenic headache (CEH) is a debilitating condition and analgesics have limited effect. Percutaneous cryoneurolysis is thus still in use although the clinical evidence is lacking. We present a randomized, controlled study to assess the clinical efficacy of cryoneurolysis compared with a corticosteroid combined with a local anaesthetic. Methods In a university-based outpatient pain clinic we performed a randomized, double blinded, comparative study with an 18-week follow-up. After positive diagnostic test blocks 52 eligible patients were randomly allocated in a ratio of 3:2, 31 participants to occipital cryoneurolysis and 21 participants to injections of 1 mL methylprednisolone 40 mg/mL (Depo-Medrol®) combined with 1 mL bupivacaine 5 mg/mL. Results We observed a significant pain reduction of more than 50% in both treatment groups, slightly improved neck function and reduced number of opioid consumers. After 6-7-weeks, however, pain intensity increased gradually, but did not reach baseline within 18 weeks. Although cryoneurolysis provided a more prolonged effect, the group differences did not reach statistical significance. Health related quality of life and psychological distress improved minimally. A large number reported minor and transient side effects, but we found no significant group differences. After 18 weeks, 29% rated the headache as much improved, and 12 (24%) somewhat improved, but a large proportion (78%) reported need for further intervention/treatment. Conclusions Cryoneurolysis provided substantial, but temporary pain relief, and the effect was not significantly different from injections of a corticosteroid combined with a local anaesthetic. Participants were selected by a single test block, and the neurolytic procedure was guided by anatomical landmarks and nerve stimulation. A stricter patient selection and an ultrasound-guided technique might have improved the results. Cryoneurolysis provides temporary pain relief not significantly superior to corticosteroid injection, and the results question the value of occipital cryoneurolysis for a chronic pain condition like CEH. Implications Occipital cryoneurolysis may be considered when non-invasive treatments appear insufficient, but only for patients who have responded substantially to test blocks. A risk of local scar and neuroma formation by repeated cryoneurolysis, leading to neuropathic pain has been discussed by other researchers.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , Pain Management , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
18.
J Headache Pain ; 20(1): 98, 2019 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31638888

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic headache (PTH) is associated with considerable disability and reduced health-related quality of life. Despite the very high prevalence of PTH, there are no evidence-based guidelines for PTH treatment. Thus, we found it timely to provide a systematic review of the current literature on acute and preventive pharmacological treatment of PTH using PubMed and Embase databases. FINDINGS: Included studies involved acute and preventive pharmacological treatment of headache attributed to traumatic injury to the head in adherence to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) criteria. Of 1424 potentially relevant articles identified, 63 were retrieved for detailed evaluation and seven studies (one prospective and six retrospective) met the inclusion criteria. None of the seven included studies were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or used a placebo-controlled study design. CONCLUSION: We found that there is a lack of high-quality evidence-based studies on the pharmacological treatment of PTH. Future studies are highly needed and must emphasize open-label studies with rigorous methodology or RCTs with a placebo-controlled design.


Subject(s)
Post-Traumatic Headache/diagnosis , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Humans , Post-Traumatic Headache/epidemiology , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
19.
Cephalalgia ; 39(14): 1762-1775, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31550910

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute and persistent post-traumatic headache are often debilitating consequences of traumatic brain injury. Underlying physiological mechanisms of post-traumatic headache and its persistence remain unknown, and there are currently no approved therapies for these conditions. Post-traumatic headache often presents with a migraine-like phenotype. As calcitonin-gene related peptide promotes migraine headache, we explored the efficacy and timing of intervention with an anti- calcitonin-gene related peptide monoclonal antibody in novel preclinical models of acute post-traumatic headache and persistent post-traumatic headache following a mild traumatic brain injury event in mice. METHODS: Male, C57Bl/6 J mice received a sham procedure or mild traumatic brain injury resulting from a weight drop that allowed free head rotation while under minimal anesthesia. Periorbital and hindpaw tactile stimulation were used to assess mild traumatic brain injury-induced cutaneous allodynia. Two weeks after the injury, mice were challenged with stress, a common aggravator of migraine and post-traumatic headache, by exposure to bright lights (i.e. bright light stress) and cutaneous allodynia was measured hourly for 5 hours. A murine anti- calcitonin-gene related peptide monoclonal antibody was administered after mild traumatic brain injury at different time points to allow evaluation of the consequences of either early and sustained calcitonin-gene related peptide sequestration or late administration only prior to bright light stress. RESULTS: Mice with mild traumatic brain injury, but not a sham procedure, exhibited both periorbital and hindpaw cutaneous allodynia that resolved by post-injury day 13. Following resolution of injury-induced cutaneous allodynia, exposure to bright light stress re-instated periorbital and hindpaw cutaneous allodynia in injured, but not sham mice. Repeated administration of anti-calcitonin-gene related peptide monoclonal antibody at 2 hours, 7 and 14 days post mild traumatic brain injury significantly attenuated the expression of cutaneous allodynia when evaluated over the 14-day post injury time course and also prevented bright light stress-induced cutaneous allodynia in injured mice. Administration of anti-calcitonin-gene related peptide monoclonal antibody only at 2 hours and 7 days after mild traumatic brain injury blocked injury-induced cutaneous allodynia and partially prevented bright light stress-induced cutaneous allodynia. A single administration of anti-calcitonin-gene related peptide monoclonal antibody after the resolution of the peak injury-induced cutaneous allodynia, but prior to bright light stress challenge, did not prevent bright light stress-induced cutaneous allodynia. CONCLUSIONS: We used a clinically relevant mild traumatic brain injury event in mice along with a provocative stimulus as novel models of acute post-traumatic headache and persistent post-traumatic headache. Following mild traumatic brain injury, mice demonstrated transient periorbital and hindpaw cutaneous allodynia suggestive of post-traumatic headache-related pain and establishment of central sensitization. Following resolution of injury-induced cutaneous allodynia, exposure to bright light stress re-established cutaneous allodynia, suggestive of persistent post-traumatic headache-related pain. Continuous early sequestration of calcitonin-gene related peptide prevented both acute post-traumatic headache and persistent post-traumatic headache. In contrast, delayed anti-calcitonin-gene related peptide monoclonal antibody treatment following establishment of central sensitization was ineffective in preventing persistent post-traumatic headache. These observations suggest that mechanisms involving calcitonin-gene related peptide underlie the expression of acute post-traumatic headache, and drive the development of central sensitization, increasing vulnerability to headache triggers and promoting persistent post-traumatic headache. Early and continuous calcitonin-gene related peptide blockade following mild traumatic brain injury may represent a viable treatment option for post-traumatic headache and for the prevention of post-traumatic headache persistence. ABBREVIATIONS: CA Cutaneous allodynia CGRP Calcitonin gene-related peptide mTBI Mild traumatic brain injury PTH Post-traumatic headache APTH Acute post-traumatic headache PPTH Persistent post-traumatic headache.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion/chemically induced , Brain Concussion/drug therapy , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide/toxicity , Post-Traumatic Headache/chemically induced , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Animals , Brain Concussion/physiopathology , Chronic Disease , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Post-Traumatic Headache/physiopathology , Vasodilator Agents/toxicity
20.
J Child Neurol ; 34(12): 739-747, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31232148

ABSTRACT

Traumatic brain injury causes significant morbidity in youth, and headache is the most common postconcussive symptom. No established guidelines exist for pediatric post-traumatic headache management. We aimed to characterize common clinical practices of child neurologists. Of 95 practitioners who completed our survey, most evaluate <50 pediatric concussion patients per year, and 38.9% of practitioners consistently use International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria to diagnose post-traumatic headache. Most recommend nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as abortive therapy, though timing after injury and frequency of use varies, as does the time when providers begin prophylactic medications. Amitriptyline, topiramate, and vitamins/supplements are most commonly used for prophylaxis. Approach to rest and return to activities varies; one-third recommend rest for 1 to 3 days and then progressive return, consistent with current best practice. With no established guidelines for pediatric post-traumatic headache management, it is not surprising that practices vary considerably. Further studies are needed to define the best, evidence-based management for pediatric post-traumatic headache.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Post-Concussion Syndrome/drug therapy , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Amitriptyline/therapeutic use , Child , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Neurologists , Post-Concussion Syndrome/prevention & control , Post-Traumatic Headache/prevention & control , Topiramate/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...