ABSTRACT
Abdominal pregnancy represents a rare subset of ectopic pregnancy with a reported incidence around one per 10,000 live births. It is associated with high fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality. In this case, we describe a 25-year-old primigravida female who presented as a trauma activation with acute hypotension following blunt trauma to the abdomen and who was found to have a viable abdominal pregnancy with placental abruption. Given hypotension and non-reassuring fetal heart tones, the decision was made to take the patient to the operating room for emergent exploratory laparotomy and cesarean section. The placenta was severely adhered to a portion of small bowel, the appendix, and the right adnexa with an approximate 20% abruption. The placenta and adhered structures were removed. In pregnant patients presenting after blunt trauma with free intraabdominal fluid and hypotension, abdominal pregnancy with abruption should be considered as an unlikely differential.
Subject(s)
Hypotension , Pregnancy, Abdominal , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Adult , Pregnancy, Abdominal/diagnosis , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Pregnancy, Abdominal/surgery , Cesarean Section , Placenta , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complicationsABSTRACT
We report the case of a 36-year-old woman with spontaneously conceived heterotopic pregnancy with abdominal pregnancy. She visited the hospital at 5 weeks and 4 days of gestation and transvaginal ultrasonography revealed a normal intrauterine pregnancy. Two days later, she was urgently transported to the hospital due to extreme abdominal pain. Emergent laparotomy was performed to investigate the cause of massive intraperitoneal bleeding, which was confirmed to have been due to an abdominal pregnancy that implanted on the vesicouterine pouch. The hematic mass, including chorionic villi, was successfully removed from the peritoneum. The subsequent course of the intrauterine pregnancy was uneventful and a healthy baby was born at term. To the best of our knowledge, this is an extremely rare case report of a spontaneously conceived heterotopic abdominal pregnancy, in which the intrauterine pregnancy showed a successful outcome despite the collapse of the abdominal pregnancy at a very early stage.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy, Abdominal , Pregnancy, Heterotopic , Adult , Chorionic Villi , Female , Humans , Peritoneum , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/diagnosis , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Pregnancy, Abdominal/surgery , Pregnancy, Heterotopic/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy, Heterotopic/etiology , Pregnancy, Heterotopic/surgeryABSTRACT
This meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of dilatation and curettage (D&C) (simply D&C or combined with other treatments) and lesion resection for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). A search of English and Chinese databases from 2010 to 2019 was conducted. Thirty one studies were retrieved including sixteen random controlled and fifteen case controlled trials. Compared with abdominal resection surgery(ARS) and vaginal resection surgery(VRS), uterine artery embolization(UAE)+D&C has no obvious difference in curative effect and safety (UAE + D&C versus ARS: Cure rate(CR): P = 0.076, time for menstruation recovery/ß-HCG normalization: P = 0.545/0.949,Blood loss: P = 0.005, adverse event: P = 0.420; versus VRS: CR: P = 0.085, time for menstruation recovery/ß-HCG normalization: P < 0.001/P = 0.031,Blood loss: P = 0.902, adverse event: P = 0.249). UAE + D&C associated with lower blood loss and less postoperative complication than laparoscopic resection surgery(LRS), but LRS take more advantages in terms of the curative effect (CR: P = 0.047, time for menstruation recovery/ß-HCG normalization: P = 0.352/0.103). The efficacy and safety of VRS are better than D&C, methotrexate (MTX) + D&C (D&C versus VRS: CR: P < 0.001, time for ß-HCG normalization: P = 0.363,blood loss: P < 0.001, adverse event: P = 0.046; MTX + D&C versus VRS: CR: P < 0.001, time for menstruation recovery/ß-HCG normalization: P < 0.001/P = 0.005, blood loss: P < 0.001, adverse event: P < 0.001). Lesion resection had advantages in shorter time for menstrual recovery/ß-HCG normalization and less adverse events, lower failure rate over the administration of D&C treatments. In detail, the curative effect of UAE + D&C is similar to ARS and VRS, but inferior to LRS, while the safety of UAE + D&C is better than LRS. The efficacy and safety of simply D&C and MTX + D&C are not as good as VRS.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Therapeutic/methods , Cicatrix/therapy , Dilatation and Curettage/methods , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/therapy , Adult , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Cicatrix/etiology , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Artery Embolization/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients who received systemic methotrexate (MTX) and to clarify the criteria for administering systemic MTX to CSP patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen CSP patients who were initially treated with systemic MTX (50 mg/m2/week) were included. Nine patients, who needed a uterine artery embolization (UAE) or a laparotomy, including a transabdominal hysterectomy (TAH), were defined as the unsuccessful MTX group. Six patients who did not require UAE or a laparotomy were defined as the successful MTX group. Furthermore, the hCG cut-off value and the GS cut-off size at the time of CSP diagnosis, which differentiated successful and unsuccessful patients, were defined. MTX success rates were investigated by combining the hCG and gestational sac (GS) size cut-off values. RESULTS: The hCG cut-off value was 17757.0 mIU/mL, and the GS cut-off size was 10.4 mm. In patients with hCG values less than 17757.0 mIU/mL, the MTX success rate was 75.0%. Fewer patients needed UAE or a laparotomy compared to patients with hCG values higher than 17757.0 mIU/mL (P = 0.007). In patients with a GS size less than 10.4 mm, the MTX success rate was 80.0%. Fewer patients among them needed UAE or a laparotomy compared to those among patients with a GS size greater than 10.4 mm (P = 0.089). In patients with hCG values and GS sizes lower than the cut-off values, the MTX success rate was 80.0%. Fewer patients among them needed UAE or a laparotomy compared to those among patients with hCG values and/or GS sizes higher than the cut-off values, respectively (P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Patients with hCG values less than 17757.0 mIU/mL and GS sizes less than 10.4 mm may have a greater chance of successful systemic MTX treatment when it is used as the first line of treatment for CSP.
Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/therapeutic use , Abortion, Therapeutic/methods , Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human/blood , Gestational Sac/pathology , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Pregnancy, Abdominal/drug therapy , Adult , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Cicatrix/complications , Female , Humans , Laparotomy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/blood , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Artery EmbolizationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical efficacy of five therapeutic strategies in patients with CSP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 135 CSP patients were included and divided into five groups based on the treatment they received, including transvaginal resection (Group A), laparoscopic resection (Group B), uterine arterial embolization (UAE) combined with hysteroscopic curettage (Group C), UAE combined with uterine curettage (Group D), and hysteroscopic curettage (Group E). To investigate the clinical efficacy of these strategies, intraoperative bleeding, serum ß-hCG levels and recovery time, menstruation recovery time, hormone levels at 1 month after treatment. RESULTS: Patients in group A had the lowest postoperative serum ß-hCG levels, and the shortest recovery times of both serum ß-hCG and menstruation, followed by patients in group B. Group C and D had small amount of blood loss. The hospital stays and costs were low in group E. In addition, the sex hormone levels showed no significant difference among the five groups. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that resection surgery and UAE have good curative effects, but high hospital costs in CSP treatment. The selection of an optimal treatment regimen for CSP should be carried out based on specific conditions of the patients.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/methods , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Cicatrix/complications , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/therapy , Adult , Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human/blood , Combined Modality Therapy , Dilatation and Curettage/methods , Female , Humans , Hysteroscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Postoperative Complications/blood , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/blood , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Artery Embolization/methodsABSTRACT
Abdominal cocoon syndrome is a rarely encountered surgical emergency first described by Foo et al. in 1978. This condition is characterised by a thick fibrous membrane which encases the small bowel partially or completely. Diagnosis of this condition is usually made per operatively and the treatment of choice is surgical release of entrapped bowel. This is a case report of abdominal cocoon syndrome diagnosed during laparotomy done with the provisional diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy following In vitro fertilization- embryo transfer. A 30 Years lady was admitted at Kathmandu Medical College for suspected ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome following In vitro fertilization- embryo transfer. Conservative treatment was done as the first line of management. Failing this, she was treated surgically with the provisional diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy. Abdominal cocoon syndrome was observed intraoperatively. Patient was managed medically with injection due to raised ßhCG level and empty uterine cavity. Intrauterine gestational sac was seen after about seven weeks of In vitro fertilization- embryo transfer. Pregnancy was terminated medically and patient was discharged. Sub fertility is a common gynecological problem. Its management may sometimes produce challenging health hazards. Thorough screening for medical and surgical illness is very important before proceeding to any kind of assisted reproductive technologies. A multidisciplinary approach is very important to manage such cases. Keywords: abdominal cocoon syndrome; embryo transfer; In Vitro fertilization; ovarian Hyper stimulation syndrome; sub fertility.
Subject(s)
Embryo Transfer/adverse effects , Fertilization in Vitro/adverse effects , Intestinal Diseases/etiology , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Intestinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Intestinal Diseases/surgery , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy, Abdominal/surgery , Syndrome , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Cesarean scar twin pregnancy is exceedingly rare and it remains to be a life-threatening condition even in the early weeks of gestation. Because of its rare occurrence, there is no consensus on the treatment modality of cesarean ectopic pregnancy. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 41-year-old, woman, gravida 7, para 6, with a history of low transverse cesarean section 2 years back presented with an estimated 6 weeks gestational age and viable spontaneous twin, monochorionic diamniotic gestation. The patient presented to the Emergency Department with complaints of vaginal bleeding and mild lower abdominal pain for 5 days. DIAGNOSES: An ultrasound examination was performed demonstrating a single intrauterine gestational sac with 2 viable embryos (monochorionic diamniotic) implanted in the lower uterine segment at the level of the prior cesarean section scar. A diagnosis of viable cesarean scar twin pregnancy was made. INTERVENTIONS: A 2 doses of 50âmg/m methotrexate (MTX) was given intramuscularly. The response to the treatment was monitored by serial beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) and ultrasound. OUTCOMES: Patient was followed up with ß-hCG weekly levels which became 0 after 68 days of treatment. During the follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic, no side effects of MTX were noticed. LESSONS: We reported a rare case of viable monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy on a cesarean scar that was successfully treated with systemic MTX without any additional therapy. Additionally, the decline of ß-hCG in twin ectopic cesarean scar pregnancy appears to be similar to a singleton ectopic pregnancy.
Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/administration & dosage , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human/blood , Cicatrix/complications , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Pregnancy, Abdominal/drug therapy , Pregnancy, Twin , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/blood , Pregnancy, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Ultrasonography, PrenatalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) is one of the most reliable methods of contraception, it is associated with an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy in case of unintended pregnancy. A rare form of ectopic pregnancy is the caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), with a high risk of serious maternal morbidity, such as uterine rupture, massive haemorrhage and resulting infertility. This report describes the first case of a viable CSP at 13 weeks of gestation in association with the use of a LNG-IUD. Case-presentation: A 36-year-old Caucasian woman was referred to our outpatient clinic because of suspicion of a CSP. The pregnancy was unintended and was diagnosed during replacement of the LNG-IUD after five years. The patient had undergone two caesarean sections in the past. Ultrasound investigation showed an intact pregnancy of approximately 13 weeks of gestation located in the uterine scar. Because of the size of the gestational sac, a laparotomy was performed under general anaesthesia using a Joel-Cohen incision. The procedure was complicated by a total blood loss of 1500 mL, mostly caused by diffuse bleeding from the placental bed. CONCLUSION: Unintended pregnancies in women using a LNG-IUD are frequently ectopic pregnancies with a preponderance to nidate outside the fallopian tube. Therefore, early diagnosis and location of the pregnancy in women using a LNG-IUD is essential.
Subject(s)
Cicatrix/complications , Contraceptive Agents, Female , Intrauterine Devices, Medicated , Levonorgestrel , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Adult , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Female , Humans , PregnancyABSTRACT
Secondary abdominal ectopic pregnancy is rare in clinical practice, but may lead to an increased maternal mortality. We present the case of a patient with an abdominal pregnancy secondary to a uterine perforation caused by a voluntary attempt to interrupt pregnancy that presented with nine weeks of abdominal pain and minimal vaginal bleeding which was mistakenly diagnosed as acute pelvic inflammatory disease, urinary tract infection, and post-abortion products of conception. Finally, the abdominal ultrasound test found an abdominal ectopic pregnancy. An exploratory laparotomy was performed and the fetus and placenta were removed without difficulties with a favorable postoperative course. It was concluded that uterine perforation during curettage of the cavity went unnoticed, leading to secondary abdominal implantation of pregnancy with a inconclusive clinical presentation, where ultrasound plays a fundamental diagnostic role. Laparotomy is indicated in most of these cases.
El embarazo ectópico abdominal secundario tiene una baja frecuencia de presentación en la práctica clínica, pero puede llevar al incremento de la mortalidad materna. Se presenta el caso de una paciente con embarazo abdominal secundario a una perforación uterina, causada por una interrupción voluntaria del embarazo. Este evolucionó durante nueve semanas con dolor abdominal y sangramiento vaginal escaso. A la paciente se le realizaron diagnósticos como enfermedad inflamatoria pélvica aguda, infección del tracto urinario, restos ovulares post aborto y definitivamente se concluyó como embarazo ectópico abdominal mediante ecografía abdominal. Se le realizó laparotomía exploradora y se extrajo el feto y la placenta sin dificultades con una evolución postoperatoria favorable hacia la curación. Se concluyó que la perforación uterina durante el curetaje de la cavidad pudo pasar inadvertida, llevando a implantación abdominal secundaria del embarazo con un cuadro clínico variable. En dicho cuadro, el ultrasonido juega un papel fundamental para su diagnóstico, siendo el manejo laparotómico el más apropiado en estos casos.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/etiology , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Pregnancy, Abdominal/diagnosis , Uterine Perforation/etiology , Adult , Diagnostic Errors , Female , Humans , Laparotomy/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Ultrasonography/methods , Uterine Perforation/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy (EP) occurs in 1% of pregnancies and is reported to be more common in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) pregnancies. An abdominal ectopic pregnancy (AEP) is a rare form of EP, and there are few reports of an AEP after IVF/ICSI. In this case report, a rare case of AEP after frozen-thawed cycle of ICSI is presented. CASE PRESENTATION: After a frozen-thawed cycle of ICSI, the beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) level at 4 weeks 0 days of gestation was 3.4 IU/L. Subsequent dysfunctional uterine bleeding was mistaken for menstruation; however, an AEP of 9 weeks with a fetal heart beat was observed by ultrasound. After the AEP was observed by ultrasound, it was extracted laparoscopically. CONCLUSION: A rare case of an AEP, which developed after frozen-thawed cycle of ICSI, presented with a very low serum HCG level. Even if the HCG titer is low, follow-up HCG levels and frequent medical examinations are necessary.
Subject(s)
Embryo Transfer/adverse effects , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/adverse effects , Adult , Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human/blood , Embryo Transfer/methods , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/blood , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy is the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality during the first trimester and the incidence increases dramatically with assisted-reproductive technology (ART), occurring in approximately 1.5-2.1 % of patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Abdominal ectopic pregnancy is a rare yet clinically significant form of ectopic pregnancy due to potentially high maternal morbidity. While risk factors for ectopic pregnancy after IVF have been studied, very little is known about risk factors specific for abdominal ectopic pregnancy. We present a case of a 30 year-old woman who had an abdominal ectopic pregnancy following IVF and elective single embryo transfer, which was diagnosed and managed by laparoscopy. We performed a systematic literature search to identify case reports of abdominal or heterotopic abdominal ectopic pregnancies after IVF. A total of 28 cases were identified. RESULTS: Patients' ages ranged from 23 to 38 (Mean 33.2, S.D. = 3.2). Infertility causes included tubal factor (46 %), endometriosis (14 %), male factor (14 %), pelvic adhesive disease (7 %), structural/DES exposure (7 %), and unexplained infertility (14 %). A history of ectopic pregnancy was identified in 39 % of cases. A history of tubal surgery was identified in 50 % of cases, 32 % cases having had bilateral salpingectomy. Transfer of two embryos or more (79 %) and fresh embryo transfer (71 %) were reported in the majority of cases. Heterotopic abdominal pregnancy occurred in 46 % of cases while 54 % were abdominal ectopic pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review has revealed several trends in reported cases of abdominal ectopic pregnancy after IVF including tubal factor infertility, history of tubal ectopic and tubal surgery, higher number of embryos transferred, and fresh embryo transfers. These are consistent with known risk factors for ectopic pregnancy following IVF. Further research focusing on more homogenous population may help in better characterizing this rare IVF complication and its risks.
Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro/adverse effects , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Pregnancy, Abdominal/surgery , Single Embryo Transfer/adverse effects , Adult , Female , Humans , Infertility, Male/diagnosis , Infertility, Male/therapy , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/diagnosis , Pregnancy, Ectopic/diagnosis , Pregnancy, Ectopic/etiology , Pregnancy, Ectopic/surgery , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
A 14-yr-old female serval (Leptailurus serval) died unexpectedly after 2 wk of inappetence and lethargy. Necropsy revealed a pyoabdomen with a full-term, well-developed fetus in the caudal abdomen covered by a mesenteric sac. The mesenteric sac communicated with a tear in the wall of the right uterine horn, supporting a diagnosis of secondary abdominal pregnancy. The uterine wall had evidence of adenomyosis at the rupture site with no evidence of pyometra. The fetus, supporting mesentery, and peritoneum were coated with mixed bacteria, which may have ascended through an open cervix to the site of uterine rupture. This is the first case of abdominal pregnancy related to uterine rupture reported in a large felid species.
Subject(s)
Felidae , Pregnancy, Abdominal/veterinary , Uterine Rupture/veterinary , Animals , Animals, Zoo , Fatal Outcome , Female , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Uterine Rupture/pathologyABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate unusual ectopic pregnancies (EP) and compare them with fallopian ones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 1000 cases of ectopic pregnancies were analyzed, including 65 unusual cases. We discussed distribution, incidence, risk factors, examinations, treatments and prognoses. RESULTS: Ovarian pregnancy was associated with placement of intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory diseases. Extratubal EP have a high rate of misdiagnosis and presented more serious manifestations. Some unusual EP could be diagnosed by ultrasonography. Ovarian pregnancy was usually manifested as positive culdocentesis. Most of the unusual EP underwent surgery, except some early cervical and corneal pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Although extratubal pregnancies are difficult to diagnose, some histories and auxiliary examinations could make diagnosis easier for clinical physicians. Surgery is still the most effective approach for treatment of unusual EP, while conservative treatment of mifepristone combined with methotrexate or curettage could be used for early diagnosis and treatment of cervical pregnancy.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy, Ectopic/etiology , Adult , China/epidemiology , Diagnostic Errors , Female , Humans , Incidence , Intrauterine Devices/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Pelvic Inflammatory Disease/physiopathology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/diagnosis , Pregnancy, Abdominal/epidemiology , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Pregnancy, Abdominal/therapy , Pregnancy, Ectopic/diagnosis , Pregnancy, Ectopic/epidemiology , Pregnancy, Ectopic/therapy , Pregnancy, Tubal/diagnosis , Pregnancy, Tubal/epidemiology , Pregnancy, Tubal/etiology , Pregnancy, Tubal/therapy , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The first steps in the diagnosis of an ectopic pregnancy are to use a sensitive qualitative urine test to detect the beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) and to perform a transvaginal ultrasonograph. y negative urine pregnancy test result is generally used to exclude an ectopic pregnancy; however, a few studies have reported the presence of a ruptured ectopic pregnancy in a patient with a negative urine pregnancy test result. Furthermore, because secondary omental implantation (SOI) is rare and probably underestimated or misdiagnosed, a case of an SOI with a negative urine hCG test has never been reported. CASE: This was a very rare case of an SOI from a ruptured tubal pregnancy in a patient with an initial series of negative urine pregnancy tests and decreased levels of serum beta-hCG. The SOI was managed with laparoscopy. CONCLUSION: For patients diagnosed with tubal or ovarian pregnancy who have negative urine pregnancy test results and decreased levels of serum beta-hCG, late-onset omental implantation should be considered as a possibility.
Subject(s)
Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human/urine , Pregnancy, Abdominal/diagnosis , Pregnancy, Abdominal/urine , Pregnancy, Tubal/diagnosis , Adult , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Pregnancy, Abdominal/surgery , Pregnancy, Tubal/urine , Rupture, Spontaneous/complications , Rupture, Spontaneous/diagnosisABSTRACT
Abdominal pregnancy is extremely rare and can result from the reimplantation of an intrauterine pregnancy after spontaneous uterine rupture. In this report, we present the case of a secondary missed abdominal pregnancy resulting from iatrogenic uterine perforation during dilatation and curettage in an early intrauterine pregnancy and subsequently misdiagnosed as intrauterine trophoblastic disease. Transvaginal ultrasound missed the diagnosis, which was finally confirmed by computed tomography. We discuss the particulars of the case along with a review of the relevant literature.
Subject(s)
Iatrogenic Disease , Pregnancy, Abdominal/diagnosis , Uterine Perforation/complications , Abdominal Pain , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Dilatation and Curettage/adverse effects , Female , Gestational Age , Gestational Trophoblastic Disease , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography, PrenatalABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To define abdominal ectopic pregnancy outcomes by both location and treatment. METHODS: Literature review of abdominal pregnancies from 1965 to August of 2009. Ectopic pregnancy exclusions were interstitial, tubal, cervical, ovarian, or those beyond 20 weeks at diagnosis/treatment. RESULTS: There were 511 cases identified with 225 meeting the inclusion criteria. There were 7 maternal deaths (3.0%) with 18 (8%) of the early abdominal ectopic pregnancies occurring with an intrauterine device in place. Mean gestational age at the time of treatment was 10 weeks 0 days and mean maternal age was 29.7 years. The average blood loss associated with treatment was 1,450 ml. The top three sites of early abdominal ectopic pregnancies were pouches around the uterus (24.3%), serosal surface of the uterus and tubes (23.9%), and multiple sites (12.8%). Primary surgical management was performed in 208 cases (87.8%). Nonsurgical adjuvant or primary therapy included intramuscular methotrexate, intralesional methotrexate, intracardiac KCl, and artery embolization. CONCLUSION: Abdominal pregnancies should be considered in all patients until an intrauterine location can be confirmed. Understanding treatment options by pregnancy location may be helpful in the management of this potentially life-threatening condition.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy, Abdominal/mortality , Pregnancy, Abdominal/therapy , Abdominal Wall , Adnexa Uteri , Blood Loss, Surgical , Digestive System , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Intrauterine Devices , Maternal Mortality , Peritoneum , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Retroperitoneal Space , UterusABSTRACT
Ectopic pregnancy is a very common diagnosis (2% of pregnancies), and implantation location varies. Although 97% of ectopics are implanted within the fallopian tube, associated with commonly recognized risk factors, ectopic implantation can occur in other pelvic and abdominal locations that may not have such predisposing risk factors. After an extensive review of the literature, along with the author's personal experience, implantation frequency, etiologic possibilities, and treatment options for each ectopic pregnancy location are presented. When ectopic pregnancy is diagnosed early, before rupture, regardless of location, conservative, fertility-sparing treatment options can be successful in terminating the pregnancy. Predisposing risk factors and treatment options can vary and can be ectopic-location specific.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy, Abdominal , Abdomen/pathology , Abortion, Therapeutic/methods , Fallopian Tubes/pathology , Female , Humans , Ovary/pathology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Abdominal/diagnosis , Pregnancy, Abdominal/etiology , Pregnancy, Abdominal/therapy , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Pregnancy in the rudimentary horn is a very rare condition. In these cases, rupture of the rudimentary horn in the second trimester with fetal death and catastrophic intraperitoneal hemorrhage is the commonly reported outcome. Silent rupture of the rudimentary horn and continuation of pregnancy as a secondary abdominal pregnancy is the most unusual outcome of this rare condition. We report such a case with a good maternal and neonatal outcome. The case is being reported for its rarity.