Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound diagnosis of interstitial ectopic pregnancy in a unicornuate uterus: A case report.

A rare case of unicornuate uterus with interstitial ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed using three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVUS). The ultrasound revealed a "lancet-shaped" endometrial corona, a gestational sac near the uterus base extending toward the uterine serosa, and visible interstitial lines. The patient underwent laparoscopic surgery for a lesion in the right fallopian tube. 3D-TVUS was crucial in precisely locating the gestational sac, aiding in effective treatment. Interstitial ectopic pregnancies risk severe hemorrhaging upon rupture. Rapid, accurate diagnosis is vital for lifesaving treatment and preventing critical complications.

[Interstitial ectopic pregnancy: report of an unusual location]. / Embarazo ectópico cornual: reporte de una localización inusual.

Ectopic pregnancy occurs when a developing blastocyst implants at any site other than the uterine cavity. Ectopic pregnancy is most commonly found in the fallopian tube but may also occur in the cornua of the uterus (also found as interstitial in the literature), cervix, ovary, or abdominal cavity or in a cesarean scar. An estimated 2% of pregnancies are ectopic, of which an interstitial pregnancy represents an extremely rare variant of ectopic pregnancy (EP), accounting for 2% to 4 % of all cases. The aim of this report is to describe the case of a patient with suspected ectopic pregnancy of uncertain location in which an exploratory laparoscopy was performed due to the onset of symptoms, discovering a cornual ectopic pregnancy in site of a past salpingectomy because of a tubal ectopic pregnancy. A cornuotomy by laparoscopy was performed to resect the cornual ectopic pregnancy. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course, with negativization of human chorionic gonadotropin levels. This type of location is rare and is associated with high rates of maternal morbidity and mortality. It represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for the gynecologist who faces it.

Se define a un embarazo ectópico cuando el blastocisto en desarrollo se implanta fuera de la cavidad uterina. La localización más frecuente es en la trompa, pero también puede ocurrir en el ovario, cérvix, cicatriz de cesárea, cuerno uterino (también mencionado como intersticial en la literatura) o abdominal. Se estima que la incidencia de embarazo ectópico es aproximadamente el 2% de todos los embarazos, siendo la localización cornual solo el 2-4% de esos casos. El objetivo de este reporte es describir el caso de una paciente con sospecha de embarazo ectópico de localización incierta a quien se le realizó una laparoscopia exploradora por inicio de síntomas, evidenciando un embarazo ectópico cornual en el lecho de una salpingectomía, producto de un embarazo ectópico tubario previo. Se realizó la cornuotomía con resección del mismo por laparoscopia y su evolución fue favorable con negativización de la subunidad beta. Este tipo de localización es rara y se asocia con grandes tasas de morbimortalidad materna. Representa un desafío diagnóstico y terapéutico para el ginecólogo que lo enfrenta.

Laparoscopic treatment of advanced interstitial pregnancy: key steps for a successful management.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a conservative laparoscopic treatment of an advanced case of interstitial pregnancy diagnosed in a woman at 14 weeks of gestational age. DESIGN: A video case report with demonstration of diagnostic workup and laparoscopic management of rare subtypes of ectopic pregnancy. SETTING: University tertiary care hospital. PATIENT(S): A 32-year-old nulliparous woman at 14 weeks of gestational age, presented with moderate abdominal pain. She reported a history of irregular periods; however, no risk factor for ectopic pregnancy was identified. The human chorionic gonadotropin level was 7,345 mIU/mL. Transvaginal ultrasound revealed an empty uterine cavity and a complex heterogeneous mass of 6 cm on the left cornual region. The myometrial thickness surrounding the gestational sac was 4 mm. INTERVENTION(S): There were several critical strategies for this laparoscopic approach. To reduce intraoperative bleeding, the peritoneum was opened, the ureters were identified, and bulldog clamps were used to temporarily reduce uterine vascularization. An intramyometrial injection of vasopressin was performed. After the first cornuostomy attempt, we had to perform a cornual resection to achieve complete removal of the ectopic mass. Multilayer uterine sutures and anatomical restoration to prevent adhesion were then accomplished. Institutional review board approval was not required for this case report as per our institution's policy; patient consent was obtained for publication of the case. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Description of laparoscopic management of huge interstitial pregnancy. RESULT(S): The overall operation time was 55 minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 55 mL. A successfully conservative treatment was achieved with no short-term complications. Postoperative ultrasound showed a normal uterus, and complete regression of human chorionic gonadotropin level was achieved 2 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSION(S): Interstitial ectopic pregnancy presents a high risk of maternal mortality considering that the interstitial part of the tube, because of its thickness, has a great capacity to expand before rupture. Despite the dimension of the lesion, in our case, the tube was still intact and the patient was in a stable clinical condition. Although cornuostomy is a more conservative solution, in these cases, cornual resection should be preferred. Through the accomplishment of reproducible key steps, laparoscopic removal of interstitial pregnancy is a feasible method and can be proposed even for advanced cases of interstitial pregnancies.

Interstitial Ectopic Pregnancy: Laparoscopic Cornuostomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate and discuss the technique of cornuostomy for surgical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. DESIGN: Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage. SETTING: Tertiary referral center in Manchester, United Kingdom. INTERVENTION: Interstitial ectopic pregnancies are rare but are associated with a higher mortality rate than other ectopic pregnancies [1,2]. It occurs when the fertilized embryo implants in the interstitial portion of the fallopian tube traversing the vascularized myometrium. When undiagnosed they present late in the second trimester associated with rupture and catastrophic bleeding, with a mortality rate of 2% to 2.5%.2 Diagnosis requires a degree of vigilance from the ultrasound operator because it is commonly misdiagnosed as intrauterine pregnancies. Surgical management options include laparoscopic cornual resection or cornuostomy. There is no consensus on the optimal surgical technique but cornuostomy is a more conservative approach associated with less disruption to uterine anatomy and loss of myometrium [3,4]. A 22-year-old gravida 4 woman presented at 7 weeks' gestation with right iliac fossa pain. Initial serum human chorionic gonadotropin was 18 136 IU/L. Transvaginal ultrasound scan showed an empty endometrial cavity and an echogenic "donut"-shaped mass within the right interstitial space, within the uterine serosa but outside the endometrial cavity (Supplemental Video 1). At laparoscopy the diagnosis of a right interstitial ectopic pregnancy was confirmed (Supplemental Video 2). Vasopressin 20 IU diluted in 80 mL of normal saline was injected around the base of the ectopic pregnancy. Monopolar diathermy was used to incise the overlying serosa followed by hydrodissection to separate the ectopic gestational sac from the myometrial attachment. The resulting defect was inspected and closed in 2 layers. Total operating time was 46 minutes. CONCLUSION: Although there is no clear evidence to guide the management of all interstitial ectopic pregnancies, an individualized approach taking into account the woman's previous history and future fertility plans and wishes is essential. In this case, given the woman's previous contralateral salpingectomy and her wishes for a conservative approach, a laparoscopic cornuostomy was likely the best option.

Management of interstitial pregnancy using laparoscopic salpingectomy with complete removal of the interstitial portion.

OBJECTIVE: To perform laparoscopic salpingectomy, including the entire interstitial portion of the fallopian tube, in the management of interstitial pregnancy. DESIGN: A step-by-step explanation of the surgical procedure using video with narration. SETTING: Obstetrics and Gynecology department of a hospital. PATIENT(S): A 23-year-old woman, gravida 1 para 0, presented asymptomatically to our hospital to undergo a pregnancy test. Her last menstrual period had occurred 6 weeks previously. Transvaginal ultrasound showed an empty uterine cavity and a right interstitial mass of 3.2 × 2.6 × 2.5 cm. It contained a chorionic sac and an embryonic bud of 0.2 cm long with a heartbeat and the presence of an "interstitial line sign." The myometrial layer surrounding the chorionic sac was 1 mm. The patient's beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level was 10,123 mIU/mL. INTERVENTION(S): On the basis of the anatomy of the interstitial portion of the fallopian tube, we treated interstitial pregnancy using laparoscopic salpingectomy, with complete removal of the interstitial portion containing the product of conception. The interstitial fallopian tube originates at the tubal ostium and follows a tortuous intramural course, progressing laterally away from the uterine cavity toward the isthmic portion. It is lined by muscular layers and an inner epithelium layer. The main blood supply of the interstitial portion is from the uterine artery's ascending branches to the fundus, extending a branch that supplies the cornu and the interstitial portion. Our approach has 3 key steps: 1) dissecting and coagulating the branch extending from the ascending branches to the fundus of the uterine artery, 2) incising the cornual serosa at the junction of the purple-blue interstitial pregnancy and the normal color myometrium, and 3) resecting the interstitial portion containing the product of conception along the outer layer of the oviduct without rupture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The interstitial portion containing the product of conception was removed entirely along the outer layer of the fallopian tube as a natural capsule without rupture. RESULTS(S): The surgery lasted for 43 min, and the volume of intraoperative blood loss was 5 mL. The pathology was confirmatory for interstitial pregnancy. The patient's beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels decreased optimally. She had a normal postoperative course. CONCLUSION(S): This approach reduces intraoperative blood loss, minimizes myometrial loss and thermal injury, and effectively avoids persistent interstitial ectopic pregnancy. It is not limited by the device used, does not increase the surgery cost, and is greatly useful in treating a selected nonruptured distally or centrally implanted interstitial pregnancy.

Interstitial Ectopic Pregnancy-Case Reports and Medical Management.

The term intramural (interstitial) ectopic pregnancy refers to a pregnancy developing outside the uterine cavity, with a gestational sac implanted into the interstitial part of the Fallopian tube, surrounded by a layer of the myometrium. The prevalence rate of interstitial pregnancy (IP) is 2-4% of all ectopic pregnancies. Surgery is the primary treatment for interstitial ectopic pregnancy; the pharmacological management of ectopic pregnancy, including IP, in asymptomatic patients includes systemic administration of methotrexate. In this report, we present two cases of this rare pregnancy type, reviewing our management technique and treatment ways presented in the literature. In our patients, the management was initially conservative and included methotrexate, administered as intravenous bolus injection, regular beta-human chorionic gonadotropins (ß-HCG) level measurements in peripheral blood, and monitoring of the patient's general condition. Due to signs of intra-abdominal bleeding in patient A and inadequate ß-HCG level reduction in patient B, both patients eventually underwent laparoscopic cornual resection. Pregnancy, implanted into the interstitial part of the Fallopian tube and surrounded by myometrial tissue with myometrial invasion of the trophoblast, poses a serious diagnostic challenge to modern gynecology due to particularly low sensitivity and specificity of symptoms, and may require both pharmacological and surgical treatment.

Multidisciplinary approach to the surgical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To present a multidisciplinary approach to localize and resect suspected interstitial ectopic pregnancies. Interstitial ectopic pregnancies are distinct from eccentric intracavitary pregnancies and are defined by ultrasound-based criteria, including an empty uterine cavity, gestational sac located >1 cm from the cavity, thin overlying myometrium <5 mm, and the interstitial line sign. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Here, we present the case of a 28-year-old patient at 6 weeks of gestation by last menstrual period who presented to the emergency department with spotting. Initial pelvic ultrasound findings demonstrated a gestational sac and yolk sac that were believed to be located eccentrically within the uterine cavity. Follow-up imaging was performed 2 weeks later that revealed the pregnancy was located at the uterotubal junction and distinct from the endometrial cavity, consistent with an interstitial ectopic. The patient had ongoing light spotting with mild cramping, a benign clinical exam, and normal laboratory findings. Accurate assessment of pregnancy location is critical given that the mortality rate from interstitial pregnancies is twice that of other ectopics. In contrast, live birth rates for eccentric intracavitary pregnancies may be up to 69%, and some clinicians consider expectant management of asymptomatic patients in the first trimester. INTERVENTION: The patient was recommended for inpatient admission with expedited surgical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. On laparoscopic entry, the pregnancy was not well-visualized because it did not deform the uterine serosa. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We present a surgical approach to suspected interstitial ectopic pregnancy that is not well-visualized at the time of laparoscopy. RESULTS: The following principles are explored: the use of multiple minimally invasive modalities (laparoscopy and hysteroscopy) to perform a thorough evaluation of the pregnancy location; incorporation of intraoperative ultrasound; temporary vessel ligation and injection of intramyometrial vasopressin; complete enucleation of the products of conception; and closure of the myometrial defect. CONCLUSION: We emphasize the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach for the localization and resection of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. This patient was discharged home in good condition with no complications.

Angular and Interstitial Ectopic Pregnancies: A Clarification of Terms and Literature Review.

Angular pregnancy is an exceedingly rare diagnosis, with less than 100 reported cases. Angular pregnancy is important to distinguish from ectopic pregnancies due to the fact that they have the potential to be viable while true ectopic pregnancies do not. As such, angular pregnancy requires starkly different management. Inappropriate use of the terms angular, interstitial, and cornual indicates a general misunderstanding of what makes these diagnoses unique. Misunderstanding leads to misdiagnosis and consequent mismanagement. Our experience with cases of women with angular and interstitial ectopic pregnancies is instructive as it illustrates effective diagnosis and differing management of these two diagnoses. In the two angular pregnancy cases, transvaginal ultrasonography was employed to confirm the diagnosis, which showed a lack of the interstitial line sign, contiguity of the decidua and endometrium, and an endomyometrial mantle thickness between 5 and 8 mm. One patient's angular pregnancy ultimately ruptured and was successfully managed with fully robotic cornual resection and unilateral salpingectomy, while the other progressed to term normally without complication. The patient with an interstitial ectopic pregnancy was also managed surgically, although with laparoscopic cornuotomy and salpingectomy.

Laparoscopically assisted hysteroscopic removal of an interstitial pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To illustrate a combined technique of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy for the management of interstitial ectopic pregnancies. DESIGN: A description of a patient case and demonstration of a surgical technique. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): A 33-year-old woman, gravida 2, para 0-0-1-0 status post in vitro fertilization cycle with single embryo transfer, was diagnosed with an unruptured right interstitial pregnancy at 5 weeks of gestation. She has a history of a pregnancy of unknown location with her first in vitro fertilization transfer and received methotrexate. The beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level was 2,726 mIU/mL. She was counseled on treatment options and declined treatment with methotrexate because of the negative side effects she experienced previously. She opted for surgical management and desired to keep her fallopian tubes if possible because she wished to try for spontaneous conception. INTERVENTION(S): The patient underwent multipuncture video laparoscopy, and a bulge was seen at the right cornua. Video hysteroscopy initially revealed an empty uterine cavity. Using atraumatic graspers, the interstitial pregnancy was gently pushed further into the uterine cavity using a milking technique. The pregnancy was then able to be visualized hysteroscopically. Products of conception were gently dislodged and removed with graspers, followed by a suction curettage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): This technique resulted in minimal blood loss, preservation of reproductive organs, and expedient return to conception planning. RESULT(S): The postoperative course was uncomplicated, and the patient was discharged the same day as surgery. After the procedure, weekly beta-human chorionic gonadotropin was drawn until the level reached <1 mIU/mL, which occurred after 4 weeks. Hysterosalpingography was performed 2 months after the procedure and demonstrated bilateral tubal patency. CONCLUSION(S): In select patients, an early interstitial pregnancy can be safely removed using the described technique. Although hysteroscopic removal of interstitial pregnancies is not a new concept, the addition of simultaneous video laparoscopy provides the benefit of allowing for fertility-sparing removal of the pregnancy, even if it is not initially visualized hysteroscopically. The use of this technique may result in minimal blood loss and preservation of the fallopian tubes. Furthermore, with the myometrium integrity maintained, the patient may resume sooner attempts at conception.

Exophytic interstitial ectopic pregnancy removal: novel use of Endoloop for uterine cavity preservation.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the unique use of Endoloop during laparoscopic removal of an exophytic interstitial ectopic pregnancy to ensure hemostasis, provide counter traction against a uterine manipulator, and reduce the likelihood of entry into the endometrium. DESIGN: Case report with intraoperative surgical footage. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center operating room. PATIENT(S): Single patient case report. INTERVENTION(S): A single patient with an ectopic pregnancy suspected using ultrasound and confirmed during surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Laparoscopic removal of the interstitial ectopic pregnancy via a wedge resection cornuectomy without endometrial involvement using a monopolar hook, Endoloop, and a William's cystoscopic needle for the injection of vasopressin. RESULT(S): The patient was a 32-year-old G7P1051 with a history of a left tubal ectopic pregnancy status post a laparoscopic left salpingectomy, 1 full-term vaginal delivery, 2 elective terminations, 2 early pregnancy losses, smoking (1 pack per day), and marijuana use (6 blunts per day). She initially presented in November 2020 with intermittent but worsening left lower quadrant abdominal pain and was found to have a left adnexal mass, raising concern for an ectopic pregnancy in the setting of a ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) level of 6,411 mIU/mL, and no intrauterine pregnancy identified using transvaginal ultrasound. She was counseled on medical vs. surgical management and she elected to receive an injection of methotrexate in the emergency department (ED) before discharge with a scheduled follow-up visit at the clinic for standard ß-hCG trends. The patient did not attend her scheduled day 4 and 7 visits for ß-hCG levels or her 2-week appointment for ultrasound; so, she was called over the phone and asked to come to the ED as soon as possible for evaluation. Approximately 3 weeks after the injection of methotrexate, the patient was still experiencing intermittent left lower quadrant abdominal pain. A repeat ultrasound in the ED showed no intrauterine gestational sac, an endometrial thickness of 0.6 cm, a normal right ovary, a normal left ovary with a corpus luteum cyst, a small amount of free fluid in the cul-de-sac, and a left adnexal extraovarian complex cystic structure measuring 2.9 × 2.4 cm with a fetal pole. The fetal pole corresponded with a gestation period of 6 weeks and 3 days, based on a crown-rump length of 0.59 cm, and lacked cardiac activity. The ß-hCG level at this time was 1,124 mIU/mL, and the patient strongly desired surgical management for her ongoing abdominal pain and unresolved ectopic pregnancy. The patient's vital signs and complete blood count were within normal limits. The patient desired future fertility. A repeat transvaginal ultrasound before surgery showed the extraovarian nature of the ectopic pregnancy but could not specify whether it was intrauterine or intra-abdominal in the left adnexa; so, the decision was made to proceed with a diagnostic laparoscopy. After laparoscopic entry through Palmer's point using the Veress needle and then insertion of a 5-mm trocar under direct visualization, the left exophytic interstitial ectopic pregnancy was discovered, as depicted in the video. Given the patient's desire for future fertility, a wedge resection cornuectomy without the involvement of the endometrium was the ideal surgical approach. Subsequent trocar placement consisted of a 10-mm trocar in the umbilicus and a 5-mm trocar in the left lower quadrant. The Endoloop was initially inserted into the umbilical 10-mm trocar to allow for placement around the interstitial ectopic pregnancy to achieve hemostasis and act as a tourniquet. The Endoloop suture was passed into the abdomen and then pulled laterally using an atraumatic grasper through the left lower quadrant trocar to provide counter traction against a uterine manipulator that was deviating the uterus to the patient's right side. This created an excellent plane for dissection along the myometrial base of the interstitial pregnancy to prevent the removal of excess uterine tissue and decrease the likelihood of entry into the endometrial cavity. Injection of 4 units vasopressin (20u in 50 mL of normal saline) using a William's cystoscopy catheter through the umbilical port further ensured hemostasis along the base of the ectopic pregnancy during removal using a monopolar hook. The cystoscopy catheter was chosen for its length and flexible body to maximize maneuverability. Electrocautery was used as needed for hemostasis. After the removal of the ectopic pregnancy using the monopolar hook, the myometrium and serosa were reapproximated in a running 2-layered fashion using a V-Loc suture. The ectopic pregnancy was removed from the abdomen in a specimen retrieval bag through the 10-mm umbilical port. The 10-mm port was closed using a standard fascial closure device and then the skin of all the port sites was reapproximated using 4-0 Monocryl suture. Two important factors that favored this surgical technique over hysterectomy or standard cornuectomy included the patient's strong desire for future fertility and the exophytic nature of the interstitial pregnancy. Nevertheless, as the pregnancy increases in distance from the cornua, so does the likelihood that the pregnancy will be a normal intrauterine pregnancy, which greatly impacts counseling and management if the pregnancy is desired. Postoperative care was routine and the recommendation was made to wait at least 3 months to attempt another pregnancy and to undergo saline-infused sonography for the evaluation of the endometrial cavity; however, the patient never followed up. CONCLUSION(S): This video demonstrates the unique use of Endoloop and vasopressin through a William's cystoscopy injection needle during the laparoscopic removal of an exophytic interstitial ectopic pregnancy. The Endoloop helped to ensure hemostasis, provide counter traction against the uterine manipulator, and optimize visualization to reduce the likelihood of endometrial involvement in a patient who desired future fertility.

Interstitial pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: A case report of a patient with interstitial pregnancy and a history of hyperprolactinemia. CASE REPORT: A 30-year-old woman was hospitalized for a suspicion of ectopic pregnancy and referred for laparoscopy. During the laparoscopic surgery, interstitial pregnancy was dia-gnosed and solved with cornuostomy. CONCLUSION: Ectopic interstitial pregnancy represents a serious worldwide issue because unrecognized, it can endanger a womans life, despite advances in ultrasound examination, the dia-gnosis often remains inaccurate. Laparoscopic surgical approach with evacuation of pregnancy with subsequent uterus suture represents one of the possible approaches. This method is minimally invasive and safe.

Laparoscopic myomectomy to facilitate laparoscopic resection of a bleeding interstitial ectopic pregnancy.

Interstitial pregnancies present a diagnostic and management challenge and are associated with significant bleeding risk. We present a case of an interstitial ectopic pregnancy where there was a diagnostic delay due to the presence of uterine fibroids and where a laparoscopic myomectomy was required in order to perform laparoscopic resection of the ruptured interstitial pregnancy.This case demonstrates the possibilities at laparoscopy for ectopic pregnancy, highlights the benefit of a structured 'buddy' system between gynaecology surgeons and brings attention to the paucity of literature on the unique management challenges of ectopic pregnancy in the presence of leiomyoma.

Surgical Treatment Following Failed Medical Treatment of an Interstitial Pregnancy.

Interstitial pregnancy (IP) is a type of ectopic pregnancy in which the embryo implants in the interstitial part of the Fallopian tube. It accounts for 2% of all ectopic pregnancies. Signs and symptoms appear later than the other forms of ectopic pregnancies because of its peculiar location. The gold standard for its diagnosis is transvaginal ultrasound. The treatment can be medical or surgical. Medical treatment is based on the systemic or local injection of methotrexate (MTX); a dose of mifepristone can be added with a reported 85-90% success rate. The surgical option is laparoscopic unilateral cornuostomy or unilateral salpingectomy. The therapeutic choice is based on symptoms, serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) values, and sonographic features. Furthermore, the patient's fertility perspectives should be considered. We report a case of IP in a Caucasian woman of 29 years old, with a previous salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy medically treated by a double dose of intramuscular MTX 50 mg/m2 combined with a single dose of leucovorin 15 mg and a single dose of mifepristone 600 mg orally. Medical therapy failed as suggested by the sudden onset of intense pelvic pain after 10 days. Because of the clinical symptoms and the sonographic suspicious of pregnancy rupture due to the modest amount of fluid in the pouch of Douglas, clinicians decided on an urgent unilateral laparoscopic salpingectomy. The hemoperitoneum was drained. The patient was discharged two days later and ß-hCG serum levels became negative after 45 days. The advantages of fertility sparing should be weighted according to the patient's reproductive perspectives. Appropriate counseling is therefore key in managing the treatment of interstitial pregnancy.

Surgical treatment of interstitial pregnancy without cornual resection: A case report.

RATIONALE: Interstitial pregnancy (IP) is a rare but extremely life-threatening form of ectopic pregnancy. The traditional surgical treatment for this anomaly is the resection of uterine cornua or fallopian tubes, which often damages their structural integrity, thereby compromising the reproductive potential for women who wish to preserve fertility. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 33-year-old female was admitted to our hospital with suspected ectopic pregnancy, following a 4-weeks history of positive pregnancy tests after uterine evacuation. The patient was hemodynamically stable on arrival. Ultrasound revealed an empty uterus with an eccentric gestational sac located at the fundus and surrounded by a thin myometrium, indicative of a suspected interstitial pregnancy. DIAGNOSIS AND INTERVENTION: After failed attempt at medical management with a single dose of intramuscular methotrexate, the patient was arranged for hysteroscopy-assisted laparoscopy. In surgery, the uterine cavity appeared empty, and a 2 × 2 cm bulge with increased vascularity at the right uterine courna was identified upon examination. The gestational sac was aspirated through the vagina from the right ostium of the uterine tube using a suction curette pointing at the right ostium. Sutures were not needed afterward, and the myometrial anatomy was left undisrupted. The diagnosis of IP was confirmed by the postoperative histological report. OUTCOMES: Perioperative blood loss was approximately 10 ml and the operative time was 40 minutes. The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery and was discharged after 3 days. Subsequent follow-ups showed a significant reduction in the patient serum beta hCG to 48IU/L within 5 days postoperation, and a negative result after 7 days. LESSONS: This novel surgical technique is an alternative minimally-invasive approach for selected early diagnosed and hemodynamically stable IP patients. The technique represents a safe, quick, and simple approach combining the benefits of laparoscopy, such as allowing for immediate conversion of cornuectomy when uterus ruptures, and the benefits of suction curettage, such as shorter operative time and minimal blood loss. We believe patients with interstitial pregnancy who still have fertility wishes would benefit from this surgical technique to a larger extent in the future.

Effect of previous wedge resection for interstitial pregnancy on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles of IVF/ICSI: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women, with a previous history of wedge resection for interstitial pregnancy, in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles of IVF/ICSI. METHODS: The present study involved a retrospective case-control assessment of 75 cases and 375 control subjects over 6 years in a single center. To compare pregnancy and neonatal outcomes between cases, treated using wedge resection, and controls without any previous history of ectopic pregnancy, propensity score matching (1:5) was utilized. The study also compared subgroups in the case group. RESULTS: Women with previous wedge resection exhibited higher rates of ectopic pregnancy and uterine rupture rate as compared to control subjects (9.1% vs 1.3%, P = 0.025 and 4.5% vs 0%, P = 0.035, respectively). No statistically significant differences were recorded between the two cohorts with regard to clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and neonatal outcomes. For pregnancy type subgroup analysis, Z-score and rates of large for gestational age were recorded to be significantly lower in twin pregnancy subgroup when compared with singleton pregnancy subgroup (0.10 (- 0.59, 0.25) vs 0.50 (- 0.97, 1.39), P = 0.005; 4.5% vs 26.1%, P = 0.047, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study indicated that previous wedge resection correlated to a higher risk of ectopic pregnancy and uterine rupture. However, it might not be related to an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. The study recommended cesarean section in these patients. Further studies are required to verify the validity of current recommendations.

Life-threatening rupture of interstitial ectopic pregnancy: a rare presentation of metastatic invasive mole.

An invasive mole is an uncommon type of gestational trophoblastic disease, and if considering its implantation in an interstitial extrauterine location, we are facing a rarer condition.There are 14 cases described of interstitial ectopic gestational trophoblastic disease. As far as we know, we present the third case of invasive mole within interstitial location, in this case with pulmonary metastases.The diagnosis of an interstitial implantation is challenging. Our patient was initially diagnosed with an intrauterine hydatidiform molar pregnancy, and a uterine aspiration was performed. Two weeks later, she presented with haemodynamical instability due to a severe haemoperitoneum. A laparotomy was immediately performed and revealed a ruptured interstitial pregnancy with molar vesicle extrusion. Besides its rarity, we highlight the clinical presentation with hypovolaemic shock due to rupture of ectopic pregnancy in a young nulliparous woman, which required an emergent surgical approach with lifesaving purpose while preserving future fertility.

Diagnosis pitfall of interstitial pregnancy: a case report of a term pregnancy with abnormal placentation.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial Pregnancy (IP) is a lethal condition due to high risk of sudden onset massive hemorrhage. Such conditions are managed as soon as diagnosed almost in the first trimester. There are a few case reports of IP conditions terminated after the second trimester. Herein, we introduce a term interstitial pregnancy complicated by abnormal placentation. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case report, we introduce a 32-year-old lady, primigravida, with an undiagnosed IP that was in her 38 weeks of gestational with placenta increta. She developed with perforated IP presenting with acute abdomen and internal bleeding at 26 weeks of gestational age. However, with a misdiagnosis impression, she got stable in operation room. Then, the pregnancy continued till 36 weeks of gestational age that was misdiagnosed with cervical cancer in prenatal work-ups. Finally, during elective cesarean section at 38 weeks, an IP with placenta increta (placenta evading from the serosa to the myometrium of the uterus) was observed. The baby was healthy with no obvious anomaly or morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should be aware to detect IP in all trimesters and pay attention to the coexisting complications such as placenta accreta to manage them more accurately.

The elusive diagnosis and emergent management of a late-presenting ruptured interstitial pregnancy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial pregnancies are rare and often difficult to diagnose given their proximal position to the uterine cavity, however most are identified by 12 weeks gestation. Delayed or missed diagnosis contributes to heightened incidence of poor outcomes including hemorrhage and death. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old woman at 15 weeks gestation with confirmed intrauterine pregnancy on first trimester ultrasound and prior negative MRI presented in hemorrhagic shock and was found to have a ruptured interstitial pregnancy. Exploratory laparotomy revealed the fetus to be in the abdomen as well as a large cornual defect and abnormal placentation that resulted in supracervical hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Interstitial pregnancy should be considered in a patient presenting with symptoms consistent with ectopic rupture, especially in the setting of equivocal or suboptimal prior imaging. Earlier diagnosis may allow for fertility-sparing intervention and decreased risk of morbidity and mortality.