ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The costs associated with healthcare are of critical importance to both decision-makers and users, given the limited resources allocated to the health sector. However, the available scientific evidence on healthcare costs in low- and middle-income countries, such as Peru, is scarce. In the Peruvian context, the health system is fragmented, and the private health insurance and its financing models have received less research attention. We aimed to analyse user cost-sharing and associated factors within the private healthcare system. METHODS: Our study was cross-sectional, using open data from the Electronic Transaction Model of Standardized Billing Data-TEDEF-SUSALUD, between 2021-2022. Our unit of analysis is the user's medical bills. We considered the total amount of cost-sharing, proportion of total payments as cost-sharing, and cost-sharing as a proportion of minimum salaries. We use a multiple regression model to perform the analyses. RESULTS: Our study included 5,286,556 health services provided to users of the private health insurance in Peru. We found a significant difference was observed in the cost-sharing for hospitalization-related services, with an average of 419.64 soles per day (95% CI: 413.44 to 425.85). Also, we identified that for hospitalization-related services per day is, on average, 0.41 (95% CI: 0.41 to 0.41) minimum salaries more expensive than outpatient care, although cost-sharing per day of hospitalization represent on average only 14% of the total amount submitted. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a detailed overview of cost-sharing in the private healthcare system in Peru and the factors associated with them. Policymakers can use the study's finding that higher cost-sharing for inpatient hospitalization compared to outpatient care in private insurance can create inequities in access to healthcare to design policies aimed at reducing these costs and promoting a more equitable and accessible healthcare system in Peru.
Subject(s)
Cost Sharing , Delivery of Health Care , Insurance, Health , Peru , Humans , Cost Sharing/economics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Insurance, Health/economics , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Private Sector/economics , Health Care Costs , Hospitalization/economics , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
This study explores the peer and economic effects of corporate poverty alleviation behavior. Using the data of A-share non-financial listed corporates in Shanghai and Shenzhen of China from 2016 to 2020, the empirical analysis of this study finds that: corporate poverty alleviation behavior has significant peer effects; the guidance of local poverty alleviation policies weakens the peer effects of corporate poverty alleviation behavior; compared to private enterprises, the poverty alleviation behavior of the peer firms has a more significant impact on state-owned enterprises; and corporate poverty alleviation behavior can result in the backflow of economic benefits and achieve the organic unity of economic and social benefits. The purpose of this paper is to explore the peer effects of corporate poverty alleviation behaviors through empirical analysis using available public data. The results of the study not only increase the motivation of corporate to participate in poverty alleviation from a peer effects perspective, but also reveal key factors for sustaining corporate poverty alleviation behaviors.
Subject(s)
Poverty , China , Humans , Private Sector/economics , Peer GroupABSTRACT
This cross-sectional study examines the growth in numbers and geographic locations of private equity acquisitions in cardiology across the US.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Private Sector , Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Private Sector/economics , Private Sector/trends , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Malaria treatment is faced with the challenge of access, affordability, availability, and quality of antimalarial medicines. Affordable medicines facility-malaria (AMFm) program and subsequently Co-payment mechanism were developed to help increase access to quality assured Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) in seven countries in sub-Saharan Africa. We explored through a qualitative study, experience of healthcare personnel on Co-payment mechanism and the implication on its use in private drug outlets in Uganda. METHOD: Private drug outlets that reported stocking antimalarial agents in moderate-to-high and low malaria transmission settings were purposively selected for inclusion in the study. In each drug outlet, data was collected from a pharmacist/dispenser through key informant interview. The interview was done using a key informant interview guide which covered the following areas, (i) sociodemographic characteristics, ii) awareness of healthcare personnel on the co-payment mechanism, (iii) awareness of healthcare personnel on quality assured artemisinin combination therapies (QAACT), (iv) antimalarial stocking in private drug outlets, (v) antimalarial dispensing prices, (vi) considerations made while stocking, and pricing antimalarial agents, vii) challenges in antimalarial dispensing, and (viii) access to antimalarial agents in private drug outlets. Data was managed using Atlas.ti and analyzed using framework methodology. RESULTS: Data was collected from 25 key informants (12 pharmacists and 13 dispensers). Five themes emerged following data analysis, (i) antimalarial stocking influenced by price and client demand, (ii) access and purchasing behavior of drug outlet clients, (iii) basis of dispensing antimalarial agents in private drug outlets, (iv) awareness of QAACT, and (v) awareness of Co-payment mechanism. None of the study participants was aware of the existence of Co-payment mechanism and QAACT in the private sector. Duocotecin brand of ACTs was the most mentioned and dispensed ACT among the study participants in private drug outlets. Nearly all the pharmacists/dispensers said that many clients who request to purchase ACTs don't come with a prescription and prefer buying cheaper antimalarial agents. Study participants reported stocking and selling both ACTs and non-ACT antimalarial agents in the drug outlets. Pharmacists/dispensers in the drug outlets reported that most clients could not afford buying a full dose of an ACT. None of the study participants considered using Co-payment mechanism while stocking ACTs in the drug outlets. CONCLUSION: There is lack of awareness and utilization of Co-payment mechanism in stocking, pricing, and dispensing of ACTs among pharmacists/dispensers in private drug outlets in Uganda. The antimalarial dispensing in drug outlets was mostly based on prescriptions, clients' preferences, and medicine affordability. The Ministry of Health needs to create demand for Co-payment mechanism through public awareness campaigns, training of healthcare personnel and behavior change communication in the private sector.
Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Health Personnel , Malaria , Uganda , Humans , Antimalarials/economics , Antimalarials/supply & distribution , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Malaria/drug therapy , Malaria/economics , Health Personnel/economics , Artemisinins/economics , Artemisinins/supply & distribution , Private Sector/economics , Female , Health Services Accessibility/economics , MaleABSTRACT
To stimulate economic growth, China has launched multiple economic stimulus plans in recent years, intensifying corporate debt financing and subsequently elevating the leverage levels. Addressing and effectively reducing the leverage levels of our country's enterprises has emerged as a pressing issue in the trajectory of our economic development. This paper primarily investigates the drivers, pathways, and mechanisms for reversing the over-leveraged values of enterprises. Key findings include: (1) Excessive indebtedness exerts a negative impact on corporate value, with the suppressing effect intensifying as the degree of over-leverage increases; (2) Over-leveraged enterprises can effectively decrease their debt levels and enhance their value through private placement. Further research suggests that this mechanism operates by amplifying the operational leverage of over-leveraged enterprises post private placement and alleviating financing constraints, thereby elevating corporate value. (3) Compared to non-state-owned enterprises, state-owned enterprises exhibit higher levels of indebtedness. Among over-leveraged firms, enhancements in corporate governance and increased investment efficiency can positively transform corporate value. This study offers valuable insights for the ongoing supply-side structural reforms and governance guidance from the regulatory bodies.
Subject(s)
Investments , China , Investments/economics , Economic Development , Humans , Private Sector/economics , Commerce/economics , East Asian PeopleABSTRACT
This paper uses the difference-in-differences model to research how the "piercing the corporate veil" system marked by the 2005 Company Law amendment affects the level of corporate creditor protection. The research results show that private enterprises and local state-owned enterprises are sensitive and significant to this legal amendment. In contrast, local state-owned enterprises are more sensitive and have a stronger motivation to protect the interests of creditors. The motivation of companies with weaker profitability for creditor protection lasts not only for the year of law revision but also extends to the year of implementation. With the law's implementation, the growth effect of creditor protection for local state-owned enterprises has become more significant. Further analysis shows that the main findings of this article are more significant in companies with larger debt scales, companies with a higher year-on-year growth rate of operating income, companies with controlling shareholders, and companies with higher stock market capitalization. From an empirical research view, this paper explains the economic effect and mechanism of the whole corporate personality under the complete system and adds economic evidence for how the law acts on the capital market.
Subject(s)
Investments , Investments/legislation & jurisprudence , Investments/economics , Humans , Models, Economic , Private Sector/economics , Private Sector/legislation & jurisprudence , Industry/economics , Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Commerce/economicsABSTRACT
The United States offers two markedly different subsidy structures for private health insurance. When covered through employer-based plans, employees and their dependents benefit from the exclusion from taxable income of the premiums. Individuals without access to employer coverage may obtain subsidies for Marketplace coverage. This paper seeks to understand how the public subsidies embedded in the privately financed portion of the U.S. healthcare system impact the payments families are required to make under both ESI and Marketplace coverage, and the implications for finance equity. Using the Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS-HC) and Marketplace premium data, we assess horizontal and vertical equity by calculating public subsidies for and expected family spending under each coverage source and using Lorenz curves and Gini and concentration coefficients. Our study pooled the 2018 and 2019 MEPS-HC to achieve a sample size of 10,593 observations. Our simulations showed a marked horizontal inequity for lower-income families with access to employer coverage who cannot obtain Marketplace subsidies. Relative to both the financing of employer coverage and earlier Marketplace tax credits, the more generous Marketplace premium subsidies, first made available in 2021 under the American Rescue Plan Act, substantially increased the vertical equity of Marketplace financing. While Marketplace subsidies have clearly improved equity within the United States, we conclude with a comparison to other OECD countries highlighting the persistence of inequities in the U.S. stemming from its noteworthy reliance on employer-based private health insurance.
Subject(s)
Insurance, Health , Humans , United States , Insurance, Health/economics , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Financing, Government/statistics & numerical data , Financing, Government/economics , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Insurance Coverage/economics , Health Insurance Exchanges/economics , Health Insurance Exchanges/statistics & numerical data , Private Sector/economics , Private Sector/statistics & numerical data , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/economics , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/statistics & numerical dataSubject(s)
Hospitals, Psychiatric , Mental Health Services , Ownership , Private Sector , Humans , Hospitals, Psychiatric/economics , Hospitals, Psychiatric/organization & administration , Mental Health Services/economics , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Ownership/economics , Ownership/organization & administration , Private Sector/economics , United States , Health Workforce , Commerce , Quality of Health Care , Health Services AccessibilitySubject(s)
Commerce , Health Care Sector , Private Sector , Humans , United States , Private Sector/economics , Private Sector/organization & administration , Health Care Sector/economics , Health Care Sector/organization & administration , Public Sector/economics , Public Sector/organization & administrationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is Argentina's first cause of cancer death. Most patients have an advanced stage at diagnosis, with poor expected survival. This study aimed to characterize the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and economic impact of patients treated in the private healthcare sector and compare it with that of the public sector. METHODS: We undertook an observational cross-sectional study that extended a previous study to a referral private center in Argentina. Outcomes included the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L (to assess HRQOL), Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (financial toxicity instrument), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - General Health (to assess productivity loss), and out-of-pocket expenses in adults diagnosed of NSCLC. RESULTS: We included 30 consecutive patients from a private healthcare center (July 2021 to March 2022), totaling 131 patients (n = 101 from previous public study). The whole sample had low quality of life and relevant economic impact. Patients in the private healthcare sector showed lower disease severity and higher educational level and household income. In addition, private healthcare system patients showed higher utility (0.77 vs 0.73; P < .05) and lower impairment of daily activities (41% vs 59%; P = .01). Private health system patients also showed lower financial toxicity as measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity score (23.9 vs 20.14; P < .05) but showed no differences when financial toxicity was assessed as a dichotomic variable. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with NSCLC treated in a private healthcare center in Argentina showed a relevant HRQOL and economic impact, this impact was smaller than the one observed in publicly funded hospitals.
Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Private Sector , Public Sector , Quality of Life , Humans , Quality of Life/psychology , Argentina/epidemiology , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Private Sector/statistics & numerical data , Private Sector/economics , Lung Neoplasms/economics , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Public Sector/economics , Public Sector/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Cost of Illness , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/economics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/epidemiology , AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases (EIDs), such as Ebola virus disease and highly pathogenic influenza, are serious threats to human health and wellbeing worldwide. The financial sector has an important, yet often ignored, influence as owners and investors in industries that are associated with anthropogenic land-use changes in ecosystems linked to increased EIDs risks. We aimed to analyse financial influence associated with EIDs risks that are affected by anthropogenic land-use changes. We also aimed to provide empirical assessments of such influence to help guide engagements by governments, private organisations, and non-governmental organisations with the financial sector to advance a planetary health agenda. METHODS: For this integrative analysis, we identified regions in the world where there was evidence of a connection between EIDs and anthropogenic land-use changes between Nov 9, 1999, and Oct 25, 2021, through a targeted literature review of academic literature and grey literature to identify evidence of drivers of anthropogenic land-use change and their association with commodity production in these regions. We only included publications in English that showed a connection between deforestation and the production of one or more commodities. Publications merely describing spatial or temporal land-use change dynamics (eg, a reduction of forest or an increase of palm-oil plantations) were excluded. As we were assessing financial influence on corporate activities through ownership specifically, we focused our analysis on publicly listed companies. Equity data and data about ownership structure were extracted from Orbis, a company information database. We assessed financial influence by identifying financial entities with the largest equity ownership, descriptively mapping transboundary connections between investors and publicly listed companies. FINDINGS: 227 public and private companies operating in five economic sectors (ie, production of palm oil, pulp and wood products, cocoa, soybeans, and beef) between Dec 15, 2020, and March 8, 2021, were identified. Of these 227, 99 (44%) were publicly listed companies, with 2310 unique shareholders. These publicly listed companies operated in six geographical regions, resulting in nine case-study regions. 54 (55%) companies with complete geographical information were included in the countries network. Four financial entities (ie, Dimensional, Vanguard, BlackRock, and Norway's sovereign wealth fund) each had ownership in 39 companies or more in three of the case-study regions (ie, north America, east Asia, and Europe). Four large US-based asset managers (ie, Vanguard, BlackRock, T Rowe Price, and State Street) were the largest owners of publicly listed companies in terms of total equity size, with ownership amounts for these four entities ranging from US$8 billion to $21 billion. The specific patterns of cross-national ownership depended on the region of interest; for example, financial influence on EIDs risks that was associated with commodity production in southeast and east Asia came from not only global asset managers but also Malaysian, Chinese, Japanese, and Korean financial entities. India, Brazil, the USA, Mexico, and Argentina were the countries towards which investments were most directed. INTERPRETATION: Although commodity supply chains and financial markets are highly globalised, a small number of investors and countries could be viewed as disproportionally influential in sectors that increase EIDs risks. Such financial influence could be used to develop and implement effective policies to reduce ecological degradation and mitigate EIDs risks and their effects on population health. FUNDING: Formas and Networks of Financial Rupture-how cascading changes in the climate and ecosystems could impact on the financial sector.
Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases, Emerging , Industry , Policy , Zoonoses , Humans , Ecosystem , Industry/economics , Investments , Ownership/economics , Zoonoses/economics , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Internationality , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/economics , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Private Sector/economics , Public Sector/economics , Organizations/economicsABSTRACT
El presente trabajo incluye el análisis de los datos obtenidos mediante una encuesta realizada en enero de 2023 a 235 dermatólogos que ejercen actividad asistencial privada en España. Se añade un fotograma posterior al estudio con metodología similar realizado en 2018, al mismo tiempo que se analizan los cambios y adaptaciones que tiene la práctica con los nuevos tiempos y retos emergentes. Comparado con 2018, en 2023 destacan: incrementos en la dedicación a la actividad privada, las teleconsultas, el cobro anticipado de técnicas, la aceptación de pagos con tarjeta bancaria y banca electrónica; cambios en la periodicidad de ajuste de precios; el hecho de que un 60% de los encuestados declare que ha ajustado al alza los precios en el año; un incremento de los precios que se ajusta aproximadamente al del IPC y la observación de que los dermatólogos varones declaran con más frecuencia precios extremos más altos (AU)
The present work includes the analysis of the data obtained through a survey conducted in January 2023 to 235 dermatologists practicing private healthcare activity in Spain. A subsequent frame is added to the study with similar methodology carried out in 2018, while analyzing the changes and adaptations that the practice has with the new times and emerging challenges. Compared to 2018, in 2023 the following findings stand out: increases in dedication to private activity, teleconsultations, advance payment for techniques, acceptance of payments by bank card and electronic banking; changes in the periodicity of price adjustment; the fact that 60% of respondents state that they have adjusted prices upwards in the year; a rise in prices that is approximately in line with that of the CPI, and the observation that male dermatologists more frequently state higher extreme prices (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Fees, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Private Sector/economics , Dermatologists/economics , Dermatologists/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Cross-Sectional Studies , SpainABSTRACT
This report analyzes findings from a January 2023 survey of 235 dermatologists in private practice in Spain. The data for 2023 are compared to findings from a similar survey of conditions in 2018, to provide a snapshot of each year and identify changes in clinical practice and adaptations to emerging situations and challenges. Noteworthy changes in 2023 vs. 2018 included increased dedication to private practice and teleconsultations, more use of prepayment for procedures, more acceptance of payment by credit card or other electronic means, and variation in the timing of price changes. Sixty percent of the respondents reported planning to raise prices in 2023. The planned pricing adjustments will approximate the rise in the consumer price index. We also found that male dermatologists more often reported fees at the highest end of the range (AU)
El presente trabajo incluye el análisis de los datos obtenidos mediante una encuesta realizada en enero de 2023 a 235 dermatólogos que ejercen actividad asistencial privada en España. Se añade un fotograma posterior al estudio con metodología similar realizado en 2018, al mismo tiempo que se analizan los cambios y adaptaciones que tiene la práctica con los nuevos tiempos y retos emergentes. Comparado con 2018, en 2023 destacan: incrementos en la dedicación a la actividad privada, las teleconsultas, el cobro anticipado de técnicas, la aceptación de pagos con tarjeta bancaria y banca electrónica; cambios en la periodicidad de ajuste de precios; el hecho de que un 60% de los encuestados declare que ha ajustado al alza los precios en el año; un alza de los precios que se ajusta aproximadamente a la del IPC, y la observación de que los dermatólogos varones declaran con más frecuencia precios extremos más altos (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Fees, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Private Sector/economics , Dermatologists/economics , Dermatologists/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Cross-Sectional Studies , SpainABSTRACT
Nowadays, the international situation is severe and complex, and the structural issues within the Chinese economy are prominent. Consequently, the financial risks faced by Chinese listed companies continue to escalate. Hence, it is of great practical significance to furnish effective early warnings for financial crises in listed companies. In this paper, we first employ web crawler technology and natural language processing technology to assess four text-linguistic features in the Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section of the annual financial reports of listed companies in China from 2011 to 2020. These features are text tone, forward-looking, readability and similarity. Subsequently, we combine these features with traditional financial indicators and explore thirteen mainstream machine learning models to comparatively analyze their effectiveness in predicting financial crises in listed companies. The empirical findings of this research reveal that MD&A text readability and similarity indicators contribute valuable incremental information to prediction models, whereas text tone and forward-looking indicators exhibit the opposite effect. The latter two indicators can be manipulated more effortlessly by management, as this study's empirical findings indicate no evidence of their contributions in incremental informational value. In fact, the forward-looking indicator even introduces additional noise to the prediction. Finally, by comparing the early warning effects of thirteen machine learning models, it is found that RF, Bagging, CatBoost, GBDT, XGBoost and LightGBM models maintain stable and accurate sample recognition ability. In general, this paper constructs a more effective financial crisis early warning model by exploring the MD&A text-linguistic feature indicators, thereby offering a fresh research perspective for further investigations in this field.
Subject(s)
Commerce , Financial Stress , Linguistics , China , Financial Stress/economics , Machine Learning , Private Sector/economics , Commerce/economics , Natural Language ProcessingSubject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Health Care Costs , Health Facilities , Ownership , Private Sector , Quality of Health Care , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Health Facilities/economics , Health Facilities/standards , Ownership/economics , Ownership/organization & administration , Ownership/standards , Private Sector/economics , Private Sector/organization & administration , Private Sector/standards , Quality of Health Care/economics , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/standardsABSTRACT
Objective: To assess and compare how private and public health facilities patients cope with the economic burden of non-communicable diseases. Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Setting: Thirty-nine private and eleven public health facilities in Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. Participants: Three hundred and forty-eight (Private:173; Public:175) patients with hypertension or diabetes, or both were recruited. Main Outcome Measures: Specific coping methods and numbers of coping strategies used by participants, as well as the perceived ability of participants to cope with the economic burden of non-communicable diseases. Results: Majority of participants paid through out-of-pocket (OOP) than through health insurance(HI) (Private:OOP:90.2% HI:9.8%; Public:OOP:94.3% HI:5.7%; p=0.152). More participants in private used instalment payments(p<0.001). However, other coping strategies showed no significant difference in both groups(p>0.05). Delayed treatment (Private:102; Public:95) was the most used strategy in both arms, and the number of strategies used by the participants showed no significant difference(p=0.061). Lower levels of education, out-of-pocket payment, increasing number of clinic visits, and hospital admission were associated with the use of higher numbers of coping strategies in both groups while being female and retired/unemployed were associated with the private arm. Conclusion: Although most patients in both groups pay out-of-pocket and use detrimental coping strategies, more patients in private arm use instalment payment, a non-detrimental method. Healthcare providers, especially public providers, should adopt policies encouraging patients to use non-detrimental coping strategies to meet their healthcare expenditures. Funding: None declared.