Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 211
Filter
1.
Headache ; 61(5): 734-739, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021595

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the patient experience of telemedicine for headache care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. BACKGROUND: The use of telemedicine has rapidly expanded and evolved since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine eliminates the physical and geographic barriers to health care, preserves personal protective equipment, and prevents the spread of COVID-19 by allowing encounters to happen in a socially distanced way. However, few studies have assessed the patient perspective of telemedicine for headache care. METHODS: The American Migraine Foundation (AMF) designed a standardized electronic questionnaire to assess the patient experience of telemedicine for headache care between March and September 2020 to help inform future quality improvement as part of its patient advocacy initiative. The date parameters were identified as the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 disease and the declaration of a national emergency in the United States. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to more than 100,000 members of the AMF community through social media platforms and the AMF email database. RESULTS: A total of 1172 patients responded to our electronic questionnaire, with 1098 complete responses. The majority, 1081/1153 (93.8%) patients, had a previous headache diagnosis prior to the telemedicine encounter. A total of 648/1127 (57.5%) patients reported that they had used telemedicine for headache care during the study period. Among those who participated in telehealth visits, 553/647 (85.5%) patients used it for follow-up visits; 94/647 (14.5%) patients used it for new patient visits. During the telemedicine encounters, 282/645 (43.7%) patients were evaluated by headache specialists, 222/645 (34.4%) patients by general neurologists, 198/645 (30.7%) patients by primary care providers, 73/645 (11.3%) patients by headache nurse practitioners, and 21/645 (3.2%) patients by headache nurses. Only 47/633 (7.4%) patients received a new headache diagnosis from telemedicine evaluation, whereas the other 586/633 (92.6%) patients did not have a change in their diagnoses. During these visits, a new treatment was prescribed for 358/636 (52.3%) patients, whereas 278/636 (43.7%) patients did not have changes made to their treatment plan. The number (%) of patients who rated the telemedicine headache care experience as "very good," "good," "fair," "poor," and "other" were 396/638 (62.1%), 132/638 (20.7%), 67/638 (10.5%), 23/638 (3.6%), and 20/638 (3.1%), respectively. Detailed reasons for "other" are listed in the manuscript. Most patients, 573/638 (89.8%), indicated that they would prefer to continue to use telemedicine for their headache care, 45/638 (7.1%) patients would not, and 20/638 (3.1%) patients were unsure. CONCLUSIONS: Our study evaluating the patient perspective demonstrated that telemedicine facilitated headache care for many patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in high patient satisfaction rates, and a desire to continue to use telemedicine for future headache care among those who completed the online survey.


Subject(s)
Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 , Headache Disorders/therapy , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Foundations , Headache Disorders/diagnosis , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
2.
Neurol Sci ; 42(2): 467-473, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33409830

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Huizhou City utilized its experience with the SARS and MERS breakouts to establish a reperfusion treatment program for AIS patients. METHOD: This is a retrospective study on 8 certified stroke hospitals in Huizhou City from January 2020 to May 2020. We analyzed the number of AIS patients with reperfusion therapy, stroke type (anterior/posterior circulation stroke), modes of transport to hospital, NIHSS score, onset to door time (ODT), door to needle time (DNT), and door to puncture time (DPT). The analysis was compared with baseline data from the same time period in 2019. RESULT: In 2020, the number of AIS patients receiving reperfusion therapy decreased (315 vs. 377), NIHSS score increased [8 (4, 15) vs. 7 [ (1, 2)], P = 0.024], ODT increased [126 (67.5, 210.0) vs. 120.0 (64.0, 179.0), P = 0.032], and DNT decreased [40 (32.5, 55) vs. 48 (36, 59), P = 0.003]. DPT did not change. Seventy percent of AIS patients indicated self-visit as their main mode of transport to the hospital. In both periods, mild stroke patients were more likely to self-visit than utilize emergency systems [2019: 152 (57.6%) vs. 20 (45.6%), P = 0.034; 2020: 123 (56.9%) vs. 5 (14.7%), P < 0.001]. The NIHSS score for self-visiting patients was lower for patients who utilized the ambulance system in both years [self-visit: 6.00 (3.00, 12.00), ambulance: 14.00 (9.00, 19.00), P < 0.001]. The volume of reperfusion patients was lower in 2020; however, the decrease was only significant (P = 0.028) in February 2020. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the number of AIS patients receiving reperfusion therapy significantly decreased when compared to the same period in 2019. The patients' condition increased severity, ODT increased, and the DNT decreased. DPT was not significant for self-visiting and ambulance patients. Moderate to severe stroke patients were more likely to utilize ambulance services.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ischemic Stroke/therapy , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Reperfusion/statistics & numerical data , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Transportation of Patients/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulances/statistics & numerical data , China , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
3.
Turk J Med Sci ; 51(1): 246-255, 2021 02 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33155788

ABSTRACT

Background/aim: Physicians require information on the family centeredness of services for children with Down syndrome, one of the most frequently encountered disabilities in childhood. We aimed to determine the family-centeredness of services for young children with Down syndrome and using a bioecological theory framework we hypothesized that child, family and service-related factors would be associated with such services. Materials and methods: In a crosssectional design, children with Down syndrome seen at Ankara University Developmental Pediatrics Division (AUDPD) between February 2020 and June 2020 were included if they had received services in the community for at least 12 months. Mothers responded to the measure of process of care-20 (MPOC-20) used to measure family centeredness. Results: All 65 eligible children were included; 57% were boys and median age was 25.0 (IQR: 18.5­38.0) months. The MPOC-20 subscale scores were highest for the "respectful and supportive care (RSC)" (median 6.0; IQR: 4.8­6.8) and lowest for the "providing specific information" (median 3.0; IQR: 4.4­6.5) subscales. On univariate analyses, maternal education

Subject(s)
Disabled Children , Down Syndrome , Education, Special , Family Health/standards , Psychiatric Rehabilitation , Speech Therapy , Adult , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disabled Children/education , Disabled Children/psychology , Disabled Children/rehabilitation , Down Syndrome/epidemiology , Down Syndrome/psychology , Down Syndrome/therapy , Education, Special/methods , Education, Special/statistics & numerical data , Educational Status , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Male , Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatric Rehabilitation/methods , Psychiatric Rehabilitation/statistics & numerical data , Social Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Speech Therapy/methods , Speech Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Turkey/epidemiology
4.
Emerg Med J ; 38(4): 252-257, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32998954

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several Chinese cities have implemented dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR), although out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival rates remain low. We aimed to assess the process compliance, barriers and outcomes of OHCA in one of the earliest implemented (DA-CPR) programmes in China. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed OHCA emergency dispatch records of Suzhou emergency medical service from 2014 to 2015 and included adult OHCA victims (>18 years) with a bystander-witnessed atraumatic OHCA that was subsequently confirmed by on-site emergency physician. The circumstances and DA-CPR process related to the OHCA event were analysed. Dispatch audio records were reviewed to identify potential barriers to implementation during the DA-CPR process. RESULTS: Of the 151 OHCA victims, none survived. The median time from patient collapse to call for emergency services and that from call to provision of cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions was 30 (IQR 20-60) min and 115 (IQR 90-153) s, respectively. Only 110 (80.3%) bystanders/rescuers followed the dispatcher instructions; of these, 51 (46.3%) undertook persistent chest compressions. Major barriers to following the DA-CPR instructions were present in 104 (68.9%) cases, including caller disconnection of the call, distraught mood or refusal to carry out either compressions or ventilations. CONCLUSIONS: The OHCA survival rate and the DA-CPR process were far from optimal. The zero survival rate is disproportionally low compared with survival statistics in high-income countries. The prolonged delay in calling the emergency services negated and rendered futile any DA-CPR efforts. Thus, efforts targeted at developing public awareness of OHCA, calling for help and competency in DA-CPR should be increased.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Dispatcher/statistics & numerical data , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , China/epidemiology , Humans , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/epidemiology , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Resuscitation/methods , Resuscitation/standards , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
5.
Neurology ; 95(22): e2954-e2964, 2020 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33087492

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in procedure times, safety, and efficacy outcomes comparing 2 different protocols to enable thrombolysis in the extended or unknown time window after stroke onset with either multimodal CT or MRI. METHODS: Patients with ischemic stroke in the extended or unknown time window who received IV thrombolysis between January 2011 and May 2019 were identified from an institutional registry. Imaging-based selection was done by multimodal CT or MRI according to institutional treatment algorithms. RESULTS: IV thrombolysis was performed in 100 patients (54.3%) based on multimodal CT imaging and in 84 patients (45.7%) based on MRI. Baseline clinical data, including stroke severity and time from last seen normal to hospital admission, were similar in patients with CT and MRI. Door-to-needle times were shorter in patients with CT-based selection (median [interquartile range] 45 [37-62] minutes vs 75 [59-90] minutes; mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] -28 minutes [-35 to -21]). No differences were detected regarding the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (2 [2.0%] vs 4 [4.8%]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI] 0.47 [0.08-2.83]) and favorable outcome at day 90 (25 [33.8%] vs 33 [42.9%]; aOR 0.95 [0.45-2.02]). CONCLUSION: IV thrombolysis in ischemic stroke in the unknown or extended time window appeared safe in CT- and MRI-selected patients, while the use of CT imaging led to faster door-to-needle times. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with ischemic stroke in the extended or unknown time window, imaging-based selection for IV thrombolysis by multimodal CT compared to MRI led to shorter door-to-needle times.


Subject(s)
Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Intracranial Hemorrhages , Ischemic Stroke , Multimodal Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Thrombolytic Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Incidence , Intracranial Hemorrhages/diagnostic imaging , Intracranial Hemorrhages/drug therapy , Intracranial Hemorrhages/epidemiology , Ischemic Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Ischemic Stroke/drug therapy , Ischemic Stroke/epidemiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
6.
Psychiatr Q ; 91(3): 819-834, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32279142

ABSTRACT

From 2004 onwards, above 50 seclusion reduction programs (SRP) were developed, implemented and evaluated in the Netherlands. However, little is known about their sustainability, as to which extent obtained reduction could be maintained. This study monitored three programs over ten years seeking to identify important factors contributing to this. We reviewed documents of three SRPs that received governmental funding to reduce seclusion. Next, we interviewed key figures from each institute, to investigate the SRP documents and their implementation in practice. We monitored the number of seclusion events and the number of seclusion days with the Argus rating scale over ten years in three separate phases: 2008-2010, 2011-2014 and 2015-2017. As we were interested in sustainability after the governmental funding ended in 2012, our focus was on the last phase. Although in different rate, all mental health institutes showed some decline in seclusion events during and immediately after the SRP. After end of funding one institute showed numbers going up and down. The second showed an increase in number of seclusion days. The third institute displayed a sustained and continuous reduction in use of seclusion, even several years after the received funding. This institute was the only one with an ongoing institutional SRP after the governmental funding. To sustain accomplished seclusion reduction, a continuous effort is needed for institutional awareness of the use of seclusion, even after successful implementation of SRPs. If not, successful SRPs implemented in psychiatry will easily relapse in traditional use of seclusion.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Isolation/statistics & numerical data , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Program Evaluation , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitals, Psychiatric/economics , Humans , Netherlands , Process Assessment, Health Care/economics , Program Evaluation/economics
7.
Neuromuscul Disord ; 30(2): 173-179, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32005495

ABSTRACT

Two retrospective audits were undertaken across several hospitals to understand the frequency and preventability of emergency admissions in people with neuromuscular disease (NMD). Following audit 1 (A1), a number of preventable themes emerged on the basis of which recommendations were made to improve quality and co-ordination of care and a network approach was developed to improve awareness and education amongst patients and non-expert professionals. Audit 2 (A2) was undertaken to determine the effect of these measures. The central NHS IT database identified emergency NMD admissions. Case notes were reviewed and audited against pre-agreed criteria. A1 included 576 admissions (395 patients) A2 included 361 admissions (314 patients). Preventable admissions (where an NMD was known) accounted for 63% in A1 and 33% in A2, with more patients followed up at a specialised neuromuscular centre in A2. There were fewer re-admissions in A2 (12%) compared with A1 (25%) and lower mortality (A1: 4.5%, A2: 0.3%). A2 showed a significant rise in patients admitted under the care of neuroscience during the acute admission and fewer preventable ITU admissions. These audits demonstrate a significant impact for both patient care and potential for financial savings following the implementation of recommendations made after A1.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/standards , Medical Audit , National Health Programs/standards , Neuromuscular Diseases/therapy , Patient Admission/standards , Process Assessment, Health Care , Quality Improvement/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , England , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Medical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Public Health , Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
8.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 98, 2020 Jan 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31973701

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial evaluation of the impact of the Community Health Clubs (CHCs) in the Community Based Environmental Health Promotion Programme in Rwanda in 2015 appeared to find little uptake of 7 hygiene indicators 1 year after the end of the intervention, and low impact on prevention of diarrhoea and stunting. METHODS: Monitoring data was revisited through detailed community records with all the expected inputs, outputs and external determinants analysed for fidelity to the research protocol. Five household inventory observations were taken over a 40-month period including 2 years after the end of the cRCT in a random selection of the 50 intervention CHCs and data compared to that of the trial. Focus Group Discussion with all Environmental Health Officers of the Ministry of Health provided context to understand the long-term community dynamics of hygiene behaviour change. RESULTS: It was found that the intervention had been jeopardised by external determinants with only 54% fidelity to protocol. By the end of the designated intervention period in June 2014, the treatment had reached only 58% of households with 41% average attendance at training sessions by the 4056 registered members and 51% mean completion rate of 20+ sessions. Therefore only 10% of 50 CHCs provided the full so-called 'Classic' training as per-protocol. However, sustainability of the CHCs was high, with all 50 being active 2 years after the end of the cRCT and over 80% uptake of recommended practices of the same 7 key indicators as the trial was achieved by 2017. CONCLUSIONS: The cRCT conclusion that the case study of Rusizi District does not encourage the use of the CHC model for scaling up, raises concerns over the possible misrepresentation of the potential of the holistic CHC model to achieve health impact in a more realistic time frame. It also questions the appropriateness of apparently rigorous quantitative research, such as the cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial as conducted in Rusizi District, to adequately assess community dynamics in complex interventions.


Subject(s)
Epidemiological Monitoring , Fitness Centers/statistics & numerical data , Health Behavior , Hygiene , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Public Health/statistics & numerical data , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Rwanda
9.
Neurol Sci ; 41(6): 1547-1555, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31974796

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke. However, recanalization fails in about 16.5% of interventions. We report our experience with unsuccessful MT and analyze technical reasons plus patient-related parameters for failure. METHODS: Five hundred ninety-six patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation and intention to perform MT with an aspiration catheter and/or stent retriever were analyzed. Failure was defined as 0, 1, or 2a on the mTICI scale. Patients with failing MT were analyzed for interventional progress and compared to patients with successful intervention, whereby parameters included demographics, medical history, stroke presentation, and treatment. RESULTS: One hundred of the 596 (16.8%) interventions failed. In 20 cases, thrombus could not be accessed or passed with the device. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease is common in those patients. In 80 patients, true stent retriever failure occurred. In this group, coagulation disorders are associated with poor results, whereas atrial fibrillation is associated with success. The administration of intravenous thrombolysis and intake of nitric oxide donors are associated with recanalization success. Intervention duration was significantly longer in the failing group. CONCLUSION: In 20% of failing MT, thrombus cannot be reached/passed. Direct carotid puncture or surgical arterial access could be considered in these cases. In 80% of failing interventions, thrombus can be passed with the device, but the occluded vessel cannot be recanalized. Rescue techniques can be an option. Development of new devices and techniques is necessary to improve recanalization rates. Assessment of pre-existing illness could sensitize for occurring complications.


Subject(s)
Carotid Artery Diseases/therapy , Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery/therapy , Ischemic Stroke/therapy , Mechanical Thrombolysis , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Process Assessment, Health Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Mechanical Thrombolysis/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Stents/statistics & numerical data , Thrombolytic Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Failure
10.
Am J Surg ; 219(6): 1006-1011, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31537326

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Novel quality improvement(QI) methods are needed to optimize healthcare costs and value. Our goal was to determine if Statistical Process Control(SPC), an industrial QI tool, could transform length of stay(LOS) into a process measure, identify outliers, and their impact on surgical outcomes. METHODS: SPC was performed on an institutional colorectal resection database 1/1/13-5/1/2018 to identify outliers and compare outcome variables across outliers and non-outliers. Control charts analyzed the process performance of LOS over time. Control limits were set at ±â€¯1 standard deviation(SD) from the mean. Measures were stable within these limits. RESULTS: LOS was stable, with consistent annual rates and variation of outliers. Outliers had identifiable causes of variation that were significantly different from non-outliers(p < 0.05). The variation resulted in more complications, readmissions, and reoperations in outliers(p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SPC can be applied to LOS, a stable process measure with decreasing variability over time, and easy outlier identification. Identifying outliers can facilitate targeted quality improvement.


Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases/surgery , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
11.
Spinal Cord ; 58(1): 11-17, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31312017

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, monocentric observational study. OBJECTIVE: Investigation of incidence and complication rate of cannula changes in long-term tracheotomized patients suffering spinal cord injury. SETTING: University hospital in Bochum, Germany. METHODS: Prospective data collection of all cannula changes between September 2016 and September 2017. Physicians recorded mechanical complications and techniques to solve them, and/or complications resulting in patient-threatening condition. RESULTS: There were 149 cannula changes during 3191 observation days. Overall, urgent cannula changes occurred 2.1 times per 100 observation days. Within the first 8 weeks after tracheostomy, urgent cannula changes were necessary four times per 100 observation days, and were mandatory less than two times per 100 observation days thereafter. Overall, mechanical complications occurred in 12% of cannula changes, and 8% of cannula changes were accompanied by patient-threatening complications. Accidental decannulation (AD) occurred in 0.97 of 100 observation days. Recannulation after AD was accompanied by 29% of mechanical complications during reinsertion, and 16% led to patient-threatening complications. The major risk factors for mechanical complications were the time lag between cannula change and tracheostomy, and the urgency of the procedure while the thyroid cartilage-jugular distance was significantly associated with patient-threatening complications. CONCLUSION: AD and the requirement for urgent cannula changes are common and often related with mechanical and patient-threatening complications. Even weeks after tracheostomy, caregivers need to be aware of serious events, and therefore provide monitoring, knowledge, and appropriate resources to handle these events.


Subject(s)
Cannula/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Failure/statistics & numerical data , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Tracheostomy/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Cannula/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Tracheostomy/adverse effects
12.
Braz J Phys Ther ; 24(2): 144-151, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30846292

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC) questionnaires evaluate Family-Centered Practice (FCP) in services for children with developmental disorders. The MPOC-20 and MPOC-SP are completed by parents and by rehabilitation professionals, respectively, and are widely used in several countries. OBJECTIVES: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the MPOC-20 and MPOC-SP to Brazilian Portuguese and evaluate their reliability and internal consistency. METHODS: this study included translation, back-translation, cognitive interviews, testing of the pre-final versions, analysis of reliability and of internal consistency of the final versions. Respondents included parents and rehabilitation professionals from rehabilitation centers in four capital cities in Brazil. RESULTS: Translation and cultural-adaptation procedures ensured the Brazilian versions were understandable and semantically equivalent to the original MPOC-20 and MPOC-SP. Pre-final and final versions were analyzed and vetted by the original authors. The MPOC-20 internal consistency Cronbach's alpha varied between 0.61 and 0.91 (n=107), the test-retest reliability ICC varied between 0.44 and 0.83 and the standard error of measurement varied between 0.66 and 0.85 (n=50). The MPOC-SP internal consistency Cronbach's alpha varied between 0.52 and 0.83 (n=92), the test-retest reliability ICC between 0.83 and 0.90, and the standard error of measure between 0.34 and 0.46 (n=62). CONCLUSION: The Brazilian versions of the MPOC-20 and the MPOC-SP are in general stable and sufficiently reliable. They are relevant to the evaluation of FCP and provide information that can improve health services and ensure better care.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/methods , Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Brazil , Child , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Translations
13.
Neuropsychol Rehabil ; 30(10): 1976-1995, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31164047

ABSTRACT

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global public health issue, frequently resulting in impairments in the cognitive domains of attention, information processing speed, memory, executive function, and communication. Despite the importance of rehabilitating cognitive difficulties, and the release of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for cognitive rehabilitation, little is known about current clinician practice. This study aimed to explore current international clinician practice of cognitive rehabilitation. One hundred and fifteen English-speaking allied health professionals, including neuropsychologists and occupational therapists, from 29 countries outside Australia, were surveyed online about their current practice and reflections on cognitive rehabilitation. Both cognitive retraining and functional compensation approaches to cognitive rehabilitation were commonly utilized. Clinicians mostly targeted deficits in attention and executive functioning with retraining interventions, whilst memory deficits were mostly targeted with compensatory interventions. Clinicians were aware of and utilized various resources for cognitive rehabilitation, including CPGs. Clinicians considered the client's social support network, client engagement and motivation in rehabilitation, multidisciplinary team collaboration, and goal setting and implementation as highly impactful factors on the success of cognitive rehabilitation interventions. Whilst practice is broadly consistent with current CPG recommendations, addressing facilitating factors can further optimize client outcomes and quality of life following TBI.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/rehabilitation , Cognitive Dysfunction/rehabilitation , Cognitive Remediation/statistics & numerical data , Neurological Rehabilitation/statistics & numerical data , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Cognitive Remediation/methods , Humans , Neurological Rehabilitation/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic
14.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 13(3): 299-308, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31836602

ABSTRACT

Brazil is a country with strong socioeconomic disparities, which may explain the different rates of cervical cancer incidence and mortality and influence the quality of cervical cancer screening tests. The aim of this study was to perform a trend analysis of some quality indicators of Pap smears according to the Municipal Human Development Index (MHDI). Information about cytopathological exams (approximately 65,000,000) performed from 2006 to 2014 in women ages 25 to 64 years was obtained from the Cervical Cancer Information System (SISCOLO). The average annual percentage change (AAPC) for each indicator was calculated using the Joinpoint Regression Program, according to MHDI levels. Very low frequencies of unsatisfactory cases (<5%) were observed at different MHDI levels. Although the positivity index in the low- and medium-MHDI groups has increased, the values remained below international recommendations (3%-10%). The HSIL (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) percentage remained stationary at all levels of the MHDI. In the low- and medium-MHDI groups, most quality indicators were below the recommendations by Brazilian National Cancer Institute INCA, with no improvement trend; in the high-MHDI group, the majority of the indicators also presented no improvement, although they show slightly better quality indicators. The MHDI should be considered in the definition of the policies of the screening program for cervical cancer in Brazil, and the current program may require adjustments to achieve improved efficiency.


Subject(s)
Papanicolaou Test/statistics & numerical data , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaginal Smears/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Papanicolaou Test/standards , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix/diagnosis , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Vaginal Smears/standards
15.
Neurol Sci ; 41(4): 917-924, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31836948

ABSTRACT

Dementias are chronic, degenerative neurological disorders with a complex management that require the cooperation of different healthcare professionals. The Italian Ministry of Health produced the document "Guidance on Integrated Care pathway for People with Dementia" (GICPD) with the specific objective of providing a standardized framework for the definition, development, and implementation of integrated care pathways (ICP) dedicated to people with dementia. We searched all available Italian territorial ICPs. Two raters assessed the retrieved ICPs with a 2-point scale on a 43-item checklist based on the GICPD. Only 5 out of 21 regions and 5 out of 101 local health authorities had an ICP, with most ICPs having a moderate compliance to the GICPD, in particular for the items referring to the development and implementation of the care pathways. A low to moderate inter-rater agreement was observed, mainly due to a lack of standardized models to describe ICPs for dementias. Results suggest that policy- and decision-makers should pay more attention to the GICPD when producing ICPs. The direct communication with clinicians, and the implementation of more precise and appropriate clinical outcomes, could increase the involvement of clinicians, whose participation is crucial to guarantee that ICPs meet needs of patients and their carers.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways/standards , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Dementia/therapy , Guideline Adherence/standards , Guidelines as Topic/standards , Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Checklist/statistics & numerical data , Critical Pathways/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data
16.
Ann Behav Med ; 54(5): 308-319, 2020 04 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31676898

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening remains suboptimal among poor and underserved people. PURPOSE: We tested the effectiveness of a community-to-clinic navigator intervention to guide multicultural, underinsured individuals into primary care clinics to complete colorectal cancer screening. METHODS: This two-phase behavioral intervention study was conducted in Phoenix, Arizona (2012-2018). Community sites were randomized to group education or group education plus tailored navigation to increase attendance at primary care clinics (Phase I). Individuals who completed a clinic appointment received the tailored navigation in person or via phone (Phase II). RESULTS: In Phase I (N = 345), 37.9% of the intervention group scheduled a clinic appointment versus 19.4% of the comparison group. In Phase II, 26.5% of the original intervention group were screened versus only 10.4% of the original comparison group. Those in the intervention group were 3.84 times more likely to be screened than were those in the comparison group (odds ratio = 3.84; 95% confidence interval = 1.81-6.92). CONCLUSIONS: Translation of an efficacious tailored navigation intervention for colorectal cancer screening to a community-to-clinic context is associated with significantly increased rates of colorectal cancer screening. Navigation assistance to address barriers to screening may serve as the most important component of any educational program to increase individual adherence to colorectal cancer screening.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Implementation Science , Patient Navigation/organization & administration , Process Assessment, Health Care , Aged , Arizona , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Promotion/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Patient Navigation/statistics & numerical data , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Program Development , Program Evaluation
17.
Med Care ; 58(1): 52-58, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31688557

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The advancement of primary care research requires reliable and validated measures that capture primary care processes embedded within nationally representative datasets. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a newly developed measure of primary care processes [Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)-PC] with preliminary evidence of moderate to excellent reliability. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of community-dwelling adults with history of office-based provider visit/s using the MEPS (2013-2014). METHODS: The 3 MEPS-PC subscales (Relationship, Comprehensiveness, and Health Promotion) were tested for construct validity against known measures of primary care: Usual Source of Care, Known Provider, and Family-Usual Source of Care. Concurrent and predictive logistic regression analyses were calculated and compared with a priori hypotheses for direction and strength of association. RESULTS: For concurrent validity, all odds ratio estimates conformed with hypotheses, with 91% displaying statistical significance. For predictive validity, all estimates were in the direction of hypotheses, with 92% displaying statistically significant results. Although Relationship and Health Promotion subscales conformed uniformly with hypotheses, the Comprehensiveness subscale yielded significant results in 60% of bivariate odds ratio estimates (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The MEPS-PC composite measures display modest to strong preliminary evidence of concurrent and predictive validity relative to known indicators of primary care. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND PRACTICE: The MEPS-PC composite measures display preliminary evidence of concurrent and predictive construct validity, and it may be useful to researchers investigating primary care processes and complexities in the health care environment.


Subject(s)
Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Research/methods , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Care Surveys/methods , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/methods , Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , United States
18.
BMJ ; 367: l5205, 2019 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31578187

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine how clinicians vary in their response to new guidance on existing or new interventions, by measuring the timing and magnitude of change at healthcare institutions. DESIGN: Automated change detection in longitudinal prescribing data. SETTING: Prescribing data in English primary care. PARTICIPANTS: English general practices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In each practice the following were measured: the timing of the largest changes, steepness of the change slope (change in proportion per month), and magnitude of the change for two example time series (expiry of the Cerazette patent in 2012, leading to cheaper generic desogestrel alternatives becoming available; and a change in antibiotic prescribing guidelines after 2014, favouring nitrofurantoin over trimethoprim for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI)). RESULTS: Substantial heterogeneity was found between institutions in both timing and steepness of change. The range of time delay before a change was implemented was large (interquartile range 2-14 months (median 8) for Cerazette, and 5-29 months (18) for UTI). Substantial heterogeneity was also seen in slope following a detected change (interquartile range 2-28% absolute reduction per month (median 9%) for Cerazette, and 1-8% (2%) for UTI). When changes were implemented, the magnitude of change showed substantially less heterogeneity (interquartile range 44-85% (median 66%) for Cerazette and 28-47% (38%) for UTI). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variation was observed in the speed with which individual NHS general practices responded to warranted changes in clinical practice. Changes in prescribing behaviour were detected automatically and robustly. Detection of structural breaks using indicator saturation methods opens up new opportunities to improve patient care through audit and feedback by moving away from cross sectional analyses, and automatically identifying institutions that respond rapidly, or slowly, to warranted changes in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , State Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Datasets as Topic , Drug Substitution/statistics & numerical data , Drugs, Generic/therapeutic use , England , General Practice/organization & administration , General Practice/standards , General Practice/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , State Medicine/standards , Time Factors , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy
19.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 19(1): 139, 2019 07 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31272386

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Information exchange between physician and patient is crucial to achieve patient involvement, shared decision making and treatment adherence. No reliable method exists for measuring how much information physicians provide in a complex, unscripted medical conversation, nor how much of this information patients recall. This study aims to fill this gap by developing a measurement system designed to compare complex orally provided information to patient recall. METHODS: The development of the complex information transfer measurement system required nine methodological steps. Core activities were data collection, definition of information units and the first draft of a codebook, refinement through independent coding and consensus, and reliability testing. Videotapes of physician-patient consultations based on a standardized scenario and post-consultation interviews with patients constituted the data. The codebook was developed from verbatim transcriptions of the videotapes. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using a random selection of 10% of the statements in the transcriptions. RESULTS: Thirtyfour transcriptions of visits and interviews were collected. We developed a set of rules for defining a single unit of information, defined detailed criteria for exclusion and inclusion of relevant units of information, and outlined systematic counting procedures. In the refinement phase, we established a system for comparing the information provided by the physician with what the patient recalled. While linguistic and conceptual issues arose during the process, coders still achieved good inter-rater reliability, with intra-class correlation for patient recall: 0.723, and for doctors: 0.761. A full codebook is available as an appendix. CONCLUSIONS: A measurement system specifically aimed at quantifying complex unscripted information exchange may be a useful addition to the tools for evaluating the results of health communication training and randomized controlled trials.


Subject(s)
Communication , Decision Making , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Physician-Patient Relations , Referral and Consultation , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Participation/methods , Patient Participation/psychology , Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Tape Recording/methods
20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31240124

ABSTRACT

Study design: A multi-centre online survey to staff working in specialised and non-specialised acute units. Objectives: To identify clinical decisions and practices made for acute cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) patients with respiratory impairments and oropharyngeal dysphagia. Settings: All hospital intensive care units in the UK that admit acute cervical spinal cord injury patients. Methods: Online distribution of a 35-question multiple-choice survey on the clinical management of ventilation, swallowing, nutrition, oral hygiene and communication for CSCI patients, to multi-disciplinary staff based in specialised and non-specialised intensive care units across UK. Results: Responses were received from 219 staff members based in 92 hospitals. Of the 77 units that admitted CSCI patients, 152 participants worked in non-specialised and 30 in specialised units. Non-specialised unit staff showed variations in clinical decisions for respiratory management compared to specialised units with limited use of vital capacity measures and graduated weaning programme, reliance on coughing to indicate aspiration, inconsistent manipulation of tracheostomy cuffs for speech and swallowing and limited use of instrumental assessments of swallowing. Those in specialised units employed a multi-discplinary approach to clinical management of nutritional needs. Conclusions: Variation in the clinical management of respiratory impairments and oropharyngeal dysphagia between specialised and non-specialised units have implications for patient outcomes and increase the risk of respiratory complications that impact mortality. The future development of clinical guidance is required to ensure best practice and consistent care across all units.


Subject(s)
Cervical Cord/injuries , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Health Services Research , Intensive Care Units , Mouth Diseases/therapy , Pharyngeal Diseases/therapy , Process Assessment, Health Care , Respiration Disorders/therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Acute Disease , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Health Services Research/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Mouth Diseases/etiology , Pharyngeal Diseases/etiology , Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Respiration Disorders/etiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...