Curcumin affects autophagy of prolactinoma cells by upregulating miR-206 to exert antitumor effects.

We explored the effects of curcumin on the aberrant biological behaviors of prolactinoma cells and the downstream pathways through which curcumin exerts its antitumor effects. We used quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assays to measure miR-206 expression levels in peripheral blood samples from patients with prolactinoma before and after curcumin treatment. We also investigated the proliferation level, viability, and invasion ability of groups of cells treated with different concentrations of curcumin using 3-(4,5)-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)-3-di-phenytetrazoliumromide (MTT) assays, cell cloning assays, and Transwell assays, respectively. Furthermore, we determined the levels of autophagy-related proteins and protein kinase B/mammalian target of the rapamycin (Akt/mTOR) signaling pathway-related proteins in each group of treated cells by western blot. Curcumin treatment upregulated miR-206 expression levels in the peripheral blood of patients with prolactinoma and in GH3 cells. Knockdown of miR-206 expression enhanced the proliferation and invasive ability of GH3 cells, while curcumin treatment effectively inhibited the aberrant biological behavior of GH3 cells enhanced by miR-206 knockdown. miR-206 knockdown also activated the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway and inhibited autophagy in GH3 cells, and these changes were effectively reversed by curcumin treatment. Thus, curcumin inhibited the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway and promoted cell autophagy by miR-206 upregulation, resulting in antitumor effects that inhibited prolactinoma cell proliferation and invasion.

Metabolic and inflammatory parameters in relation to baseline characterization and treatment outcome in patients with prolactinoma: insights from a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary center.

Background: Prolactinomas (PRLs) are prevalent pituitary adenomas associated with metabolic changes and increased cardiovascular morbidity. This study examined clinical, endocrine, metabolic, and inflammatory profiles in PRL patients, aiming to identify potential prognostic markers. Methods: The study comprised data from 59 PRL patients gathered in a registry at the University Hospital of Zurich. Diagnostic criteria included MRI findings and elevated serum prolactin levels. We assessed baseline and follow-up clinical demographics, metabolic markers, serum inflammation-based scores, and endocrine parameters. Treatment outcomes were evaluated based on prolactin normalization, tumor shrinkage, and cabergoline dosage. Results: The PRL cohort exhibited a higher prevalence of overweight/obesity, prediabetes/diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia compared to the general population. Significant correlations were found between PRL characteristics and BMI, HbA1c, and fT4 levels. Follow-up data indicated decreases in tumor size, tumor volume, prolactin levels, and LDL-cholesterol, alongside increases in fT4 and sex hormones levels. No significant associations were observed between baseline parameters and tumor shrinkage at follow-up. A positive association was noted between PRL size/volume and the time to achieve prolactin normalization, and a negative association with baseline fT4 levels. Conclusion: This study underscores the metabolic significance of PRL, with notable correlations between PRL parameters and metabolic indices. However, inflammatory markers were not significantly correlated with patient stratification or outcome prediction. These findings highlight the necessity for standardized follow-up protocols and further research into the metabolic pathogenesis in PRL patients.

Phosphorylation of PBK at Thr9 by CDK5 correlates with invasion of prolactinomas.

CONTEXT: Prolactinomas are the most prevalent functional pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs), and they are invasive to surrounding anatomic structures. The detailed mechanisms of invasion are not yet clear. OBJECTIVE: We explored the role of PBK phosphorylation in the proliferation and invasion of prolactinomas and its possible mechanism. RESULTS: We report that PBK directly binds to and is phosphorylated at Thr9 by cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5), which promotes GH3 cell EMT progression and proliferation. Phosphorylation of PBK at Thr9 (pPBK-T9) by CDK5 enhances the stability of PBK. p38 is one of the downstream targets of PBK, and its phosphorylation is reduced as pPBK-T9 increases in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, we found that pPBK-T9 is highly expressed in invasive PitNETs and was significantly correlated with invasion by univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Phosphorylation of PBK at Thr9 by CDK5 promotes cell proliferation and EMT progression in prolactinomas.

Clinical Characteristics and Management of Cosecreting Thyroid Stimulating Hormone or Prolactin Pituitary Growth Hormone Adenomas: A Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: Cosecreting thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) or prolactin (PRL) in patients with pituitary growth hormone (GH) adenomas has been rarely reported. Our study aimed to elucidate their clinical characteristics. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of 22 cases of cosecreting GH and TSH pituitary adenomas [(GH+TSH)oma] and 10 cases of cosecreting GH and PRL pituitary adenomas [(GH+PRL)oma] from Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University between January 2009 and January 2023. The clinical manifestation, preoperative hormone levels, imaging features, pathologic characteristics, and biochemical remission rates were compared among 335 patients with solo-secreting GH adenomas (GHoma) and 49 patients with solo-secreting TSH adenoma (TSHoma). Patients with (GH+TSH)oma and (GH+PRL)oma were grouped according to biochemical remission to explore the risk factors leading to biochemical nonremission. RESULTS: Cosecreting pituitary GH adenomas had various clinical manifestations and a larger tumor volume and were more likely to invade the cavernous sinus bilaterally and compress the optic chiasm. GH and TSH levels were lower in (GH+TSH)oma than in GHoma or TSHoma. Solo part remission was observed both in (GH+TSH)oma and (GH+PRL)oma. Cavernous sinus invasion was an independent risk factor for biochemical nonremission in patients with (GH+TSH)oma and (GH+PRL)oma. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical manifestation of (GH+TSH)oma and (GH+PRL)oma may be atypical. When screening for pituitary adenomas, a comprehensive evaluation of all pituitary target gland hormones is needed. Cosecreting pituitary GH adenomas are more aggressive and surgery is often unable to completely remove the tumor, requiring pharmacologic or radiological treatment if necessary. Clinicians should give high priority to biochemical remission, although solo part remission may occur.

[Overcoming therapy resistance in prolactinomas: from perspectives to real clinical practice].

The main treatment option of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas is dopamine agonist therapy, which demonstrates prolactin level normalizing and reducing the size of an adenoma in the majority of cases. However, significant amount of patients - about 20% - poorly responds even to high doses of dopamine agonists that is explained by the resistance to therapy. The occurrence of pharmacodynamic characteristics is one of the causes responsible for the development of resistance to typical therapy. Clinical manifestations of persistent hyperprolactinemia are due to following pathological factors: hormonal hypersecretion and the mass-effect of pituitary adenoma. Prevention of irreversible changes is possible only with timely detection of resistance and determination of the optimal personalized treatment algorithm.We report a clinical case of dopamine-agonist resistant microprolactinoma. Patient's health stabilisation, normal level of prolactin and reduction in size of adenoma were achieved due to administration of combined treatment with tamoxifen and dopamine agonists. Hyperprolactinaemia occurring because of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma and associated adverse effects are significant problem, decreasing quality of life and demographics in general. This underlines the importance of figuring out causes and identifying predictors of the therapy resistance.The results of the study, illustrated by a clinical example, are presented in the present paper.

Presurgical Medical Treatment in Prolactinomas: Surgical Implications and Pathological Characteristics From 290 Cases.

OBJECTIVE: To review experience regarding the treatment of prolactinomas by endoscopic endonasal surgery focusing on the association between presurgical dopamine agonist (DA) treatment and perioperative outcomes, surgical morbidities, endocrine outcomes, and pathological characteristics. METHODS: A single-center series of 290 cases was analyzed retrospectively and clinical data were collected. Intratumoral collagen content was assessed by Masson trichrome staining. RESULTS: Tenacious tumor consistency (27.8% vs 9.8%, P < .001) was more common in DA-pretreated patients compared with patients who underwent initial surgery. Moreover, DA-pretreated macroadenomas presented more intraoperative blood loss (200 [100-400] mL vs 175 [100-300] mL; P = .014), longer surgical duration (177 ± 95 minutes vs 154 ± 57 minutes; P = .043), and more surgical morbidities (19.4% vs 8.9%; P = .034). Additionally, DA-pretreated macroadenomas presented a higher collagen volume fraction than that of the initial surgery group (23.6 ± 2.2% vs 13.2 ± 2.1%; P = .001). Correlation analysis revealed a close correlation between collagen volume fraction and the cumulative dose of bromocriptine (BRC) in macroadenomas (r = 0.438, P < .001). Regarding endocrine outcomes, DA-pretreated microadenomas showed a lower proportion of initial remission compared with patients who underwent initial surgery (86.7% vs 100%, P = .047). CONCLUSION: This study described increased surgical difficulty and inferior endocrine outcomes associated with tumor fibrosis secondary to presurgical BRC treatment in prolactinomas. Neurosurgeons should note that presurgical BRC treatment may render subsequent surgery more challenging.

Prolactinoma in postmenopausal women: a systematic review.

IMPORTANCE: Prolactinomas occurring during the reproductive period exhibit a characteristic behavior. There are, however, gaps in the literature regarding the behavior of these tumors after menopause. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review and characterize the influence of menopause on prolactinoma behavior. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review of observational prospective or retrospective studies and clinical trials on prolactinomas was conducted in two situations: tumors diagnosed in the reproductive period (before menopause), with follow-up in the postmenopausal period, or prolactinomas diagnosed in the postmenopausal period, without language or date restrictions. Data extracted from the articles included patient and tumor characteristics (prolactinoma type, previous treatment, symptoms, and serum prolactin [PRL] levels). FINDINGS: This study included five studies comprising 180 participants. Prolactinomas diagnosed in women of reproductive age are treated with dopaminergic agonists (DAs), with indications of treatment withdrawal after menopause, exhibited stable tumor behavior and PRL levels. Considering the diagnosis during the postmenopausal period, macroprolactinomas were more prevalent and showed tumor shrinkage when DAs were used. Cabergoline, the most commonly used drug, lowers PRL levels and reduces symptoms associated with adenoma. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Microadenomas diagnosed before menopause can be followed up without treatment. Prolactinomas diagnosed after menopause are typically macroadenomas. Cabergoline remains the treatment of choice in the presence of clinical or compressive symptoms. We recommend at least one annual follow-up for such patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Resection for Prolactinoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Case-series.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS) for prolactinoma is reserved for dopamine agonist (DA) resistance, intolerance, or apoplexy. High remission (overall 67%, microprolactinoma up to 90%), low recurrence (5-20%) rates highlighted that surgery might be first-line treatment. AIMS: To report on outcomes of ETSS in a cohort of prolactinomas. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort of 137 prolactinoma patients (age 38.2 ± 13.7 years; 61.3% female, median follow-up 28.0 [15.0-55.5] months) operated between 2010-2019 with histopathological confirmation. RESULTS: Median preoperative prolactin levels were 166 (98-837 µg/L; males 996 [159-2145 µg/L] vs. females 129 [84-223 µg/L], p <0.001). 56 (40.9%) microprolactinomas, 69 (50.4%) macroprolactinomas, and 7 (5.1%) giant prolactinomas were included, whereas no adenoma was detected in 5 (3.6%) patients. Males had larger tumors (macroprolactinomas: 38, 71.7%) vs. 31 (36.9%), p <0.001; giant prolactinomas: 7 (13.2%) vs. 0 (0.0%), (p <0.001). Prolactinomas were graded as KNOSP-3 in 15 (11.5%), and KNOSP-4 in 20 (15.3%) patients. Primary indication was DA intolerance (59, 43.1%); males 14 (26.4%) vs. females 45 (53.6%), p = 0.006. Long-term remission (i.e., DA-free prolactin level <1xULN) was achieved in 87 (63.5%) patients, being higher in intended complete resection (69/92 [75.0%]), and lower in males (25 [47.2%] vs. 62 females [73.8%], p = 0.002). Transient DI (n = 29, 21.2%) was the most frequent complication. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high proportions of macroprolactinoma and KNOSP 3-4, long-term remission rates were 63.5% overall, and 83.3% in microprolactinoma patients. Males had less favorable remission rate compared to females. These findings highlight that ETSS may be a safe and efficacious treatment to manage prolactinoma.

Endoscopic endonasal surgery for prolactinomas: prognostic factors for disease control and management of persistent disease.

Only a limited number of studies have focused on the results of the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach (EEA) for treatment of prolactinomas. We sought to assess the effectiveness of EEA for prolactinoma surgery, identify factors for disease remission, and present our approach for the management of persistent disease. Forty-seven prolactinomas operated over 10 years, with a mean follow-up of 59.9 months, were included. The primary endpoints were early disease remission and remission at last follow-up. Resistance/intolerance to DA were surgical indications in 76.7%. Disease remission was achieved in 80% of microprolactinomas and 100% of microprolactinomas enclosed by the pituitary. Early disease remission was correlated with female gender (p=0.03), lower preoperative PRL levels (p=0.014), microadenoma (p=0.001), lack of radiological hemorrhage (p=0.001), absence of cavernous sinus (CS) invasion (p<0.001), and extent of resection (EOR) (p<0.001). Persistent disease was reported in 48.9% of patients, with 47% of them achieving remission at last follow-up with DA therapy alone. Repeat EEA and/or radiotherapy were utilized in 6 patients, with 66.7% achieving remission. Last follow-up remission was achieved in 76.6%, with symptomatic improvement in 95.8%. Factors predicting last follow-up remission were no previous operation (p=0.001), absence of CS invasion (p=0.01), and EOR (p<0.001). Surgery is effective for disease control in microprolactinomas. In giant and invasive tumors, it may significantly reduce the tumor volume. A multidisciplinary approach may lead to long-term disease control in three-quarters of patients, with symptomatic improvement in an even greater proportion.

Genetic testing in prolactinomas: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Prolactinomas represent 46%-66% of pituitary adenomas, but the prevalence of germline mutations is largely unknown. We present here the first study focusing on hereditary predisposition to prolactinoma. OBJECTIVE: We studied the prevalence of germline mutations in a large cohort of patients with isolated prolactinomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed combining genetic and clinical data from patients referred for genetic testing of MEN1, AIP, and CDKN1B between 2003 and 2020. SF3B1 was Sanger sequenced in genetically negative patients. RESULTS: About 506 patients with a prolactinoma were included: 80 with microprolactinoma (15.9%), 378 with macroprolactinoma (74.7%), 48 unknown; 49/506 in a familial context (9.7%). Among these, 14 (2.8%) had a (likely) pathogenic variant (LPV) in MEN1 or AIP, and none in CDKN1B. All positive patients had developed a macroprolactinoma before age 30. The prevalence of germline mutations in patients with isolated macroprolactinoma under 30 was 4% (11/258) in a sporadic context and 15% (3/20) in a familial context. Prevalence in sporadic cases younger than 18 was 15% in men (5/33) and 7% in women (4/57). No R625H SF3B1 germline mutation was identified in 264 patients with macroprolactinomas. CONCLUSIONS: We did not identify any LPVs in patients over 30 years of age, either in a familial or in a sporadic context, and in a sporadic context in our series or the literature. Special attention should be paid to young patients and to familial context.

The Value of ER∝ in the Prognosis of GH- and PRL-Secreting PitNETs: Clinicopathological Correlations.

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are divided into multiple histological subtypes, which determine their clinical and biological variable behavior. Despite their benign evolution, in some cases, prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH)-secreting PitNETs may have aggressive behavior. In this study, we investigated the potential predictive role of ER∝, alongside the clinicopathological classification of PitNETs (tumor diameter, tumor type, and tumor grade). A retrospective study was conducted with 32 consecutive cases of PRL- and mixed GH- and PRL-secreting PitNETs (5 patients with prolactinomas and 27 with acromegaly, among them, 7 patients with GH- and PRL- co-secretion) who underwent transsphenoidal intervention. Tumor specimens were histologically and immunohistochemical examined: anterior pituitary hormones, ki-67 labeling index, CAM 5.2, and ER∝; ER∝ expression was correlated with basal PRL levels at diagnosis (rho = 0.60, p < 0.01) and postoperative PRL levels (rho = 0.58, p < 0.001). In our study, the ER∝ intensity score was lower in female patients. Postoperative maximal tumor diameter correlated with Knosp grade (p = 0.02); CAM 5.2 pattern (densely/sparsely granulated/mixed densely and sparsely granulated) was correlated with postoperative PRL level (p = 0.002), and with ki-67 (p < 0.001). The IGF1 level at diagnosis was correlated with the postoperative GH nadir value in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (rho = 0.52, p < 0.05). Also, basal PRL level at diagnosis was correlated with postoperative tumor diameter (p = 0.63, p < 0.001). At univariate logistic regression, GH nadir in OGTT test at diagnostic, IGF1, gender, and invasion were independent predictors of remission for mixed GH- and PRL-secreting Pit-NETs; ER∝ can be used as a prognostic marker and loss of ER∝ expression should be considered a sign of lower differentiation and a likely indicator of poor prognosis. A sex-related difference can be considered in the evolution and prognosis of these tumors, but further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Giant prolactinoma in Asian-Indians: A single-center experience from Western India.

PURPOSE: Giant prolactinomas (GP) are rare tumors accounting for 4.3% of prolactinomas, with paucity of literature from India. We aim to describe clinical, biochemical, radiological, and treatment outcomes in a large series of Asian-Indian patients with GP. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis of GPs (n=84), age-based (adults: 66 versus pediatric: 18) and gender-based (males: 64 versus females: 20) comparison was done. RESULTS: The mean age at presentation was 34.1±13years, and 64 (76.2%) were males. Males were younger at presentation (32.1±12.2 versus 40.1±13.8years, P: 0.01). The majority presented with mass-effect-related manifestations (visual disturbances: 91.6%, headache: 84.5%) and/or hypogonadism (98.7%). At baseline, largest tumor dimension was 5.3±1.0cm, and serum prolactin was 8343 (3865.5-12,306) ng/mL; most (94.6%) had gonadal axis involvement. Dopamine-agonist (DA) as first-line therapy (45/67, 67.2%) achieved normoprolactinemia (maximum cabergoline dose: 2.0±1.2mg/week) in 36/45 (80%) and tumor response (≥50% reduction) in 36/37 (97.3%) patients at the last follow-up (median duration: 33 [14.5-53.5]months). Notably, gonadal axis recovery was poor (6/30, 20%) despite normoprolactinemia post-DA monotherapy. At latest follow-up, secondary hypothyroidism (32.5% versus 82.6%, P: 0.001) and central hypocortisolism (5.6% versus 42.9%, P: 0.007) were less frequent in DA monotherapy (n=43) than in multimodal therapy group (n=23). The proportion of males (94.4% versus 71.2%, P: 0.04) was higher in the pediatric age group, with DA-induced (first-line) normoprolactinemia observed in 66.7% of them. CONCLUSION: GP has male predominance, DA as first-line therapy normalized prolactin in four-fifths of patients with better preservation of HPT and HPA axes in patients with DA monotherapy.

Long-term Discontinuation of Dopamine Agonist Treatment in Patients with Prolactinomas Revisited.

The most common type of functioning pituitary adenomas is prolactinomas; unlike other types, they are treated medically with dopamine agonists (DA). This treatment aims to normalize PRL levels and decrease tumor size by 50% or more. These objectives are typically achieved by 90% of patients with microprolactinoma, two-thirds of those with macroprolactinomas, and about half of those with giant prolactinomas. Life-long pharmacological treatment implies costs, discomfort, and the possibility of side effects, therefore, it has been suggested that DA discontinuation could be attempted in some patients. Long-term remission seems more likely in who, after 2 years of therapy achieve clinical, biochemical, and imaging remission criteria: no evidence of hypogonadism, a normal PRL level (preferably <5 ng/mL), and a >50% of tumor size reduction. Long-term remission seems to be more likely if the patient has been treated with cabergoline (CBG) for a minimum of 2 years, the PRL levels have normalized, tumor size has decreased by at least 50%, and the DA dose can gradually be tapered down to 0.25-0.5 mg per week. After treatment withdrawal, about 65% of patients experience a recurrence of hyperprolactinemia within the first 12 months of DA discontinuation. Although in most patients in whom DA discontinuation has been attempted, the hyperprolactinemia will recur, not all of them will require re-initiation of treatment. A good clinical judgement is crucial to identify those patients who need life-long treatment.

Prolactinomas Resistant to Dopamine Agonists: Pathophysiology and Treatment.

Prolactinomas are the most common functional pituitary tumors, accounting for 40% of all pituitary adenomas. Medical treatment with dopamine agonists (DA), mainly cabergoline, is considered the primary therapy for these patients. Prolactin normalization is achieved in 80-90% of prolactinomas treated with cabergoline. Patients resistant to the standard dose can escalate the dose of cabergoline up to the maximum tolerated dose. The expression of dopamine (D2) receptors and dopamine affinity is decreased in aggressive and resistant prolactinomas. Patients with aggressive and DA-resistant adenomas or with rare PRL-secreting carcinomas can be treated off-label with temozolomide (TMZ), a DNA alkylating agent. TMZ is effective in 40-50% of treated lactotroph tumors showing at least a partial response. However, patients tend to escape from the effect of TMZ after a limited time of response. Other therapeutic options include aromatase inhibitors, the somatostatin receptor ligand pasireotide, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), immune-checkpoint inhibitors, tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, or everolimus, the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor. These experimental treatments were effective in some patients carrying refractory prolactinomas showing usually partial tumor control. However, the number of treated patients with any of these new therapeutic options is very limited and treatment results are inconsistent, thus additional experience with more patients is required.

Care trajectories of surgically treated patients with a prolactinoma: why did they opt for surgery?

PURPOSE: To describe care trajectories in patients with prolactinoma, aiming to clarify the rationale for surgery. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with prolactinoma undergoing surgery from 2017 to 2019 at the referral center (RC), prior to surgery being considered a viable treatment option (i.e. PRolaCT study). Demographics and clinical data (type and duration of pretreatment and surgical indications, goals, and outcomes) were collected from patient records. Care trajectories were divided into three phases: (1) diagnosis and initial treatment, (2) endocrine treatment at the RC, and (3) surgical treatment. RESULTS: 40 patients were included (31 females (77.5%), median age 26.5 (14-63) years. Indications for surgery were dopamine agonist (DA) intolerance (n = 31, 77.5%), resistance (n = 6, 15.0%), and patient/physician preference (n = 3, 7.5%). Patients were pretreated with DA (n = 39 (97.5%)), and surgery (n = 3 (7.5%)). Median disease duration at surgery was 4 (0-27) years. Primary surgical goal was total resection in 38 patients (95.0%), of which biochemical remission was achieved 6 months postoperatively in 23 patients (62.2%), and clinical remission in 6 patients (16.2%), missing data n = 1. CONCLUSION: Care trajectories were highly individualized based on patient and tumor characteristics, as well as the multidisciplinary team's assessment (need for alternative treatment, surgical chances and risks). Most patients were pretreated pharmacologically and had broad variation in timing of referral, undergoing surgery as last-resort treatment predominantly due to DA intolerance. High quality imaging and multidisciplinary consultations with experienced neurosurgeons and endocrinologists enabling treatment tailored to patients' needs were prerequisites for adequate counseling in treatment of patients with prolactinoma.

Giant prolactinomas, a detailed analysis of 196 adult cases.

PURPOSE: Giant prolactinomas are a rare entity, representing approximately 5% of all prolactinomas. A systematic review of 196 adult cases was performed. A comparison of the clinical, biochemical and radiological characteristics, management and therapeutic outcomes in men versus women is made. METHODS: A structured search was conducted using the term 'giant prolactinoma'. Following inclusion criteria were used: diameter ≥ 40 mm, prolactin levels > 1000 ng/ml and no concomitant GH/ ACTH secretion. RESULTS: 196 cases were included [age: 38 (28-50) years, F/M ratio: 1/3.6]. Median tumor diameter was 53 (43-69) mm. Pituitary deficiency was present in 91% of cases, with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism being the most frequent. Most common presenting symptoms were visual impairment (73%) and headache (50%) in men and amenorrhea (58%) in women. 82% of cases were treated with a dopamine agonist (DA) as first-line treatment which led to normoprolactinemia, tumor shrinkage and visual improvement in 51%, 88% and 85% of cases, respectively. Surgery was performed in 29% of cases and all showed tumor remnant and persistent hyperprolactinemia. Women had a lower prolactin level and a smaller tumor diameter at diagnosis but pituitary deficiencies were more frequent and outcome was worse. CONCLUSION: Giant prolactinomas are rare and have a male predominance. Visual impairment is the most frequent presenting symptom in men and amenorrhea in women. The gender-related difference in tumor size and level of prolactin was confirmed in this analysis where men had a larger diameter and a higher baseline prolactin level. DAs are the treatment of choice, irrespective of tumor size and presence of visual impairment. As only half of the cases achieved normoprolactinemia we do not, in contrast to previous literature, state giant prolactinomas to be exquisitely sensitive to DAs. Patient characteristics associated with persistent hyperprolactinemia after treatment with a DA were female gender, higher baseline prolactin and larger tumor size . This analysis did show TSH- and ACTH-deficiency to be more frequent after surgery which was not seen for LH/FSH deficiency.

Long-term Follow-up of 84 Patients With Giant Prolactinomas-A Swedish Nationwide Study.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes in a nationwide cohort of patients with giant prolactinomas. METHODS: Register-based study of patients with giant prolactinomas [serum prolactin (PRL) > 1000 µg/L, tumor diameter ≥40 mm] identified in the Swedish Pituitary Register 1991-2018. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients [mean age 47 (SD ±16) years, 89% men] were included in the study. At diagnosis, the median PRL was 6305 µg/L (range 1450-253 000), the median tumor diameter was 47 mm (range 40-85), 84% of the patients had hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and 71% visual field defects. All patients were treated with a dopamine agonist (DA) at some point. Twenty-three (27%) received 1 or more additional therapies, including surgery (n = 19), radiotherapy (n = 6), other medical treatments (n = 4), and chemotherapy (n = 2). Ki-67 was ≥10% in 4/14 tumors. At the last follow-up [median 9 years (interquartile range (IQR) 4-15)], the median PRL was 12 µg/L (IQR 4-126), and the median tumor diameter was 22 mm (IQR 3-40). Normalized PRL was achieved in 55%, significant tumor reduction in 69%, and combined response (normalized PRL and significant tumor reduction) in 43%. In the primary DA-treated patients (n = 79), the reduction in PRL or tumor size after the first year predicted the combined response at the last follow-up (P < .001 and P = .012, respectively). CONCLUSION: DAs effectively reduced PRL and tumor size, but approximately 1 patient out of 4 needed multimodal treatment. Our results suggest that the response to DA after 1 year is useful for identifying patients who need more careful monitoring and, in some cases, additional treatment.

Surgical Treatment of Prolactinomas: Potential Role as a First-Line Treatment Modality.

PURPOSE: Treatment with dopamine agonists (DAs) has been the first-line standard treatment for prolactinoma, and surgery has been reserved for drug intolerance and resistance for several decades. We evaluated whether surgery plays a primary role in prolactinoma management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 210 prolactinoma patients who had received surgical treatment at our institution. We analyzed the treatment outcomes according to tumor extent, sex, and preoperative DA medication. RESULTS: Overall hormonal remission was achieved in 164 patients (78.1%), and complete removal was achieved in 194 patients (92.4%). When the tumors were completely removed, the remission rate increased to 84.5%. Anterior pituitary function was normalized or improved in 94.6% of patients, whereas only 4.1% of patients showed worsening of hormone control. Hormonal remission was higher in patients who had not received DA preoperatively than in those who had received preoperative DA treatment. Smaller tumor size (<1 cm), no invasion into the cavernous sinus, and female sex were predictors of good surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although DAs remain the first-line standard treatment for prolactinomas, surgery can be an excellent option and should be considered as an alternative primary treatment modality when patients are predicted to achieve a good surgical outcome.