Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 6.323
Filter
1.
Trials ; 25(1): 332, 2024 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773595

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-cutaneous malignancy in men and leads to the second most common cause of cancer related mortality in men. Early detection of PCa allows for a potentially curative intervention. Most men will live over a decade from the time of their PCa diagnosis. Thus, treatments must balance curative interventions with their impact on quality of life. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one such potentially curative intervention but often leads to erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence (UI). Approximately 90,000 RPs are performed each year in the USA. Post-operative ED and UI is thought to occur in part from traumatic peripheral nerve injury (TPNI) to the neurovascular bundles that surround the prostate. Thus, patients undergoing RP may be a population that would benefit from clinical studies that look at TPNI. METHODS: The study is a single-institution, double-blinded placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in which patients immediately post-RP receive either 4-aminopyrdine (4AP) or placebo in a 1:1 fashion. The primary outcome is evaluation of the efficacy of 4AP in accelerating the early return of baseline erectile and urinary function post-radical prostatectomy. DISCUSSION: This study is critical as it could reduce the morbidity associated with RP, a commonly performed operation, and identify a patient population that may greatly benefit into further TPNI research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03701581. Prospectively registered on October 10, 2018.


Subject(s)
Erectile Dysfunction , Peripheral Nerve Injuries , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Urinary Incontinence , Humans , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Male , Double-Blind Method , Erectile Dysfunction/etiology , Erectile Dysfunction/drug therapy , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/etiology , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/drug therapy , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Recovery of Function
2.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 305, 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724829

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Postoperative urinary retention (PUR) is a common complication after prostate enucleation, which leads to an increased length of hospital stay and decreased postoperative satisfaction. This study determined the predictive factors of postoperative urine retention within 1 month after prostate enucleation and investigated whether PUR influences surgical outcomes at the 2-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up time points. METHODS: Data were collected from the electronic medical records of 191 patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) during October 2018 to September 2021. Of them, 180 patients who underwent thulium laser or plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP, PKEP) were separated into the PUR group (n = 24) and the non-PUR (NPUR) group (n = 156). Uroflowmetry and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire were followed up at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The PUR group had a significantly higher percentage of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) than the NPUR group. Postoperatively, compared with the NPUR group, the PUR group had significantly less improvement in changes in the IPSS Quality of Life scores at 2 weeks, the total IPSS(International Prostate Symptom Score) at all follow-up times, the IPSS-S(IPSS storage subscores) at 2 weeks and 3 months, and the IPSS-V(IPSS voiding subscores) at all follow-up times. Predictive factors for PUR include lower preoperative maximum urinary flow (Qmax), lower preoperative total IPSS, and higher operation time. CONCLUSION: Lower preoperative Qmax, lower IPSS scores, and longer operation time were risk factors for PUR. Furthermore, PUR could be a prognostic factor for prostatic enucleation surgical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Urinary Retention , Humans , Male , Urinary Retention/etiology , Urinary Retention/epidemiology , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Middle Aged , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Endoscopy
3.
Scand J Urol ; 59: 104-108, 2024 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38738961

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) is a common procedure for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Anorectal symptoms such as fecal incontinence (FI), rectal urgency or disturbed defecation have been reported after the operation. Anorectal function is dependent on the integrity of anal and pelvic nerves and muscles, rectal sensory function as well as rectal reservoir function. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential influence of RALP on anorectal physiological function and bowel symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this pilot study, 29 patients with localised prostate cancer scheduled for RALP were included. Anorectal physiology was used to measure rectal sensitivity and reservoir function as well as anal sphincter pressures. Bowel symptoms were measured by a bowel function questionnaire and a 2-week bowel function diary. Measurements were done before the operation and repeated at 6 months after the operation. RESULTS: The study observed a significant postoperative increase in rectal sensory threshold for rectal balloon distention, from 20 to 40 mmHg, P < 0.001. This change is indicative of a decrease in rectal sensation after RALP. There were no other statistical significant differences in any of the physiological tests performed. Importantly, there was no change in any of the bowel symptoms after surgery. CONCLUSION: This study showed that RALP may lead to impaired rectal sensory function. This finding did not, however, seem to have any influence on the patients´ postoperative clinical bowel function.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Rectum , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Laparoscopy/methods , Rectum/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Anal Canal/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Fecal Incontinence/etiology , Fecal Incontinence/physiopathology , Defecation/physiology , Time Factors
4.
Fr J Urol ; 34(2): 102570, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717458

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The increasing number of subjects with benign prostate obstruction (BPO) has become a worldwide concern. The sexual problem after benign prostate enlargement (BPE) surgery that has received the most attention in the literature is ejaculation disorder. However, there appears to be a change in orgasmic sensation independent of ejaculation retention. The objective of our study is to explore the influence of BPE surgery on orgasmic function. METHODS: We evaluated the prospective, multicenter clinical data of 104 patients undergoing BPE surgery who reported maintaining sexual activity from January 2016 to November 2020. The endpoint of this study was to decipher the percentage of patients with an orgasm disorder as assessed by the difference between pre-and-postoperative question 10 of the IIEF 15 questionnaire. RESULTS: Orgasm function was stable, improved, and degraded in 34% (n=35), 30% (n=31), and 36% (n=38) respectively. A deterioration in orgasm was statistically significant in men who maintained quality ejaculation with retained force preoperatively and a high IIEF15 scale values preoperative of orgasmic function, overall and intercourse patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: To enable the patient to maintain a satisfying and healthy sex life after any BPE surgery, urologist physicians should know the prevalence of orgasmic side effects after surgical treatment to provide appropriate counseling to patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Grade 4.


Subject(s)
Orgasm , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Humans , Male , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Aged , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/etiology , Patient Satisfaction
5.
Fr J Urol ; 34(2): 102574, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717461

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has shifted over the last decades, with medical therapy becoming the primary treatment modality while surgery is being reserved mostly to patients who are not responding to medical treatment or presenting with complications from BPH. Here, we aim to to discuss the optimal timing of surgical management of LUTS/BPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted on Pub-Med/MEDLINE database to identify reports published from January 1990 until January 2022 by combining the following MeSH terms: "Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms"; "Prostatic Hyperplasia"; "Prostatic Hyperplasia/therapy"; "Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications"; "Treatment Outcome"; "Time-to-Treatment". Evidence supporting or not early surgical treatment of BPH was examined and reported in a pros and cons form. RESULTS: The "pro early surgery" highlighted the superior efficacy and cost-effectiveness of surgery over medical treatment for BPH, as well as the possibility of worse postoperative outcomes for delayed surgical treatment. The "con early surgery" considered that medical therapy is efficient in well-selected patients and can avoid the serious risks inherent to surgical treatment of BPH including important sexual side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trials comparing the outcomes for prolonged medical therapy versus early surgical treatment could determine which approach is more beneficial in the long-term in context of the aging population. Until then, both approaches have their advantages and patients should be involved in the treatment decision.


Subject(s)
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Time-to-Treatment , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Humans , Male , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/surgery , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/etiology , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Time Factors
6.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 200, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713381

ABSTRACT

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has emerged as an effective treatment for prostate cancer with obvious advantages. This study aims to identify risk factors related to hypoxemia during the emergence from anesthesia in patients undergoing RALP. A cohort of 316 patients undergoing RALP was divided into two groups: the hypoxemia group (N = 134) and the non-hypoxemia group (N = 182), based on their postoperative oxygen fraction. Comprehensive data were collected from the hospital information system, including preoperative baseline parameters, intraoperative data, and postoperative recovery profiles. Risk factors were examined using multiple logistic regression analysis. The study showed that 38.9% of patients had low preoperative partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) levels. Several clinical parameters showed significant differences between the hypoxemia group and the non-hypoxemia group, including weight (P < 0.0001), BMI (P < 0.0001), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.044), history of emphysema and pulmonary alveoli (P < 0.0001), low preoperative PaO2 (P < 0.0001), preoperative white blood cell count (P = 0.012), preoperative albumin (P = 0.048), intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.043), intraoperative CO2 accumulation (P = 0.001), duration of surgery (P = 0.046), postoperative hemoglobin level (P = 0.002), postoperative hypoxemia (P = 0.002), and early postoperative fever (P = 0.006). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed BMI (adjusted odds ratio = 0.696, 95% confidence interval 0.612-0.719), low preoperative PaO2 (adjusted odds ratio = 9.119, 95% confidence interval 4.834-17.203), and history of emphysema and pulmonary alveoli (adjusted odds ratio = 2.804, 95% confidence interval 1.432-5.491) as independent factors significantly associated with hypoxemia on emergence from anesthesia in patients undergoing RALP. Our results demonstrate that BMI, lower preoperative PaO2, and a history of emphysema and pulmonary alveolar disease are independent risk factors associated with hypoxemia on emergence from anesthesia in patients undergoing RALP. These findings provide a theoretical framework for surgeons and anesthesiologists to facilitate strategies to mitigate postoperative hypoxemia in this unique patient population.


Subject(s)
Hypoxia , Laparoscopy , Postoperative Complications , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Male , Hypoxia/etiology , Risk Factors , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Anesthesia/methods
7.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 76(2): 157-165, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742551

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: One recent addition to different lasers used for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate is the thulium fiber laser (TFL). The purpose of this systematic review is to present the feasibility, safety and efficacy of TFL Enucleation of the Prostate (ThuFLEP). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed®, Scopus® and Cochrane® primary databases were systematically screened. The search strategy used the PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) criteria. Patients should be adults with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) undergoing ThuFLEP. While comparative studies reporting comparison of ThuFLEP to other BPO treatments were included, cohort studies with no comparison group were also accepted. Outcomes including enucleation time and complication rates were reported. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twelve studies met all the predefined criteria and were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Mean operative time and enucleation time ranged from 46.6±10.2 to 104.5±33.6 and from 38.8±17.9 to 66.0±24.9 minutes, respectively. Most of the complications were Grade I or Grade II ones. Although TFL was found to present some advantages over older BPO treatments, its outcomes were comparable with other endoscopic enucleation approaches. CONCLUSIONS: ThuFLEP seems to be a feasible, safe and efficient approach for BPO symptoms management. Limited evidence showed that although ThuFLEP was associated with a reduced total operative time, it was also associated with worse IPSS improvement at 1-year follow-up, when compared with MOSESTM Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP). These findings confirm the well-established opinion that the enucleation technique itself is more important than the technology which is used.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Thulium , Humans , Male , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Thulium/therapeutic use , Laser Therapy/methods , Laser Therapy/instrumentation , Laser Therapy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Operative Time
8.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 76(2): 241-246, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742557

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of dual-console telesurgery with the new KangDuo system in an animal experiment and clinical study. METHODS: Six canine models were performed radical prostatectomy with dual-console KanDuo surgical robot-1500 (KD-SR-1500-RARP). The perioperative outcomes, physical and mental workload of the surgeon were collected. Physical workload was evaluated with surface electromyography. Mental workload was evaluated with NASA-TLX. After conducting animal experiments to verify safety of dual-console KD-SR-1500-RARP, we conducted the clinical trial using 5G and wired networks. RESULTS: In the animal experiment, all surgeries were performed successfully. The operative time was 80.2±32.1 min. The docking time was 2.4±0.5 min. The console time was 49.7±25.3 min. There were no perioperative complications or equipment related adverse events. All dogs can micturate after catheter removal at one week postoperatively. The mental workload was at a low level (a scale ranging from 0 to 60), which scored 15.7±6.9. Among the eight recorded muscles, the fatigue degree of the right radial flexor and left biceps was the highest two (iEMG, resection, 299.8±344 uV, 109.9±16.9 uV; suture, 849.4±1252.5 uV, 423.1±621.3 uV, respectively). In the clinical study, the console time was 136 min. The mean latency time was ≤200 ms. The data pocket loss was <1%. The operation was successfully completed without malfunctions occurring throughout the entire process. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-console telesurgery with the KD-SR-1500 system was shown to be feasible and safe in radical prostatectomy using 5G and wired networks.


Subject(s)
Feasibility Studies , Prostatectomy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Animals , Dogs , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Male , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Humans , Middle Aged , Equipment Design , Operative Time , Aged , Electromyography , Telemedicine/methods
9.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 76(2): 210-220, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742554

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transient urinary incontinence (UI) is distressing event following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Novel technique namely, veil sparing HoLEP (VS-HoLEP), was proposed to improve early continence outcome. In this trial (NCT03494049), VS-HoLEP was compared to standard HoLEP (St-HoLEP). METHODS: VS-HoLEP entails early apical separation with sparing of ventral apical mucosal veil proximal to the verumontanum. Eligible symptomatic BPH patients were randomly allocated to St-HoLEP (91) and VS-HoLEP (89). The primary outcome was UI as depicted by one-hour pad test at one month postoperatively. Other outcome measures include all perioperative parameters, complications, and urinary outcome measures at different follow-up points. RESULTS: Median preoperative prostate size was 138 (50:282) and 128 (50:228) mL in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively. At one month the number of patients with positive one-hour pad test was 21 (23.1%) and 10 (11.4%) in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively (P 0.047). The difference was significantly in favor of VS-HoLEP considering the number of patients reporting UI, the number of patients with positive one-hour pad test as well as the grade of UI reported at one and 4 months. The difference was not statistically significant at 12 months. The median time to patients' reported continence was 8 (1-52) and 1.5 (1-52) weeks in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively (P≤0.005). The technique independently predicted positive one-hour pad test at one and four months respectively. At twelve months presence of DM (diabetes mellitus) and more percent PSA reduction independently predicted positive one-hour pad test. CONCLUSIONS: Veil sparing HoLEP enhances significantly early postoperative urine continence both subjectively and objectively. Optimization of the surgical technique could cut short the number of leaking patients and reduce the degree as well as the duration of transient postoperative urine leak.


Subject(s)
Lasers, Solid-State , Postoperative Complications , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Urinary Incontinence , Humans , Male , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Lasers, Solid-State/adverse effects , Aged , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Urinary Incontinence/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Laser Therapy/methods , Laser Therapy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
10.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 28(6): 2396-2402, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567602

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the incidence of urinary incontinence following transurethral thulium laser prostatectomy with three different prostate apex disconnection techniques: semi-separation, pre-separation, and post-separation. The findings aim to provide references for clinical treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 74 patients treated with transurethral thulium laser prostatectomy for prostatic hyperplasia from April 2022 to March 2023. Complete clinical and follow-up data were available for 52 patients. Clinical and follow-up data were collected for these patients. A comparison was made of urinary incontinence following the three different types of prostate apex disconnection in transurethral thulium laser prostatectomy. RESULTS: In this study, the immediate postoperative urinary incontinence rate for transurethral thulium laser prostatectomy was 9.62% (5/52), the short-term incontinence rate was 11.54% (5/52), and the long-term incontinence rate was 9.62% (5/52). The immediate postoperative incontinence rates for semi-separation, pre-separation, and post- separation were 8.33% (1/12), 8.33% (2/24), and 12.5% (2/16), respectively. The short-term incontinence rates for semi-separation, pre-separation, and post-separation were 8.33% (1/12), 8.33% (2/24), and 18.75% (3/16), respectively. The long-term incontinence rates for semi-separation, pre-separation, and post-separation were 8.33% (1/12), 8.33% (2/24), and 12.5% (2/16), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of urinary incontinence following transurethral thulium laser prostatectomy was lower with semi-separation and pre-separation compared to post-separation.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Transurethral Resection of Prostate , Urinary Incontinence , Male , Humans , Prostate , Thulium/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/adverse effects , Laser Therapy/adverse effects , Laser Therapy/methods , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Urinary Incontinence/epidemiology , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Lasers , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods
11.
Int J Med Robot ; 20(2): e2630, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We investigated the rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) post robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify studies that reported the rates of AKI post-RALP. A random effects model was used, and the pooled rates of AKI were calculated. RESULTS: We identified 10 studies with 60,937 patients to be included. The mean age was 65.1 years. The mean anaesthesia time was 234.3 min (95% CI: 177.8-290.9). The mean operation time was 212.2 min (95% CI: 188.7-235.6). The mean estimated blood loss was 314.1 mL (95% CI: 153-475.3). The mean intraoperative IV fluids administered were 1985 mL (95% CI: 1516.3-2453.7). The pooled rate of AKI post RALP was 7.2% (95% CI 19-23.9). CONCLUSIONS: The rates of AKI after RALP are significant. Further studies are needed to detect the risk factors for AKI and to determine the rates of chronic kidney disease post-RALP.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Male , Humans , Aged , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Acute Kidney Injury/complications , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
12.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 158, 2024 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38568342

ABSTRACT

Prior history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) can complicate Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Very few studies analyse the outcomes of RARP in men with a prior history of TURP. We analysed the oncological and functional outcomes of RARP in post-TURP men from our prospectively maintained database. We included the RARP data from January 2016 to January 2022. Thirty men who had RARP with a prior history of TURP were identified (Group 2). They were matched using R software and propensity score matching to 90 men with no previous TURP (Group-1). The groups were matched for age, body mass index (BMI), Gleason score, stage, PSA and D'Amico risk category in a 1:3 ratio. The two-year oncological and functional outcomes were compared. Overall, the study found no significant difference between the groups in the preoperative parameters, such as BMI, age, Gleason grade, clinical stage, PSA, prostate volume, and D'amico risk grouping. There was no difference in the estimated blood loss. The TURP group had a lower chance of having a nerve spare (p = 0.03). The median console time was longer in the TURP group (140 min (120,180) versus 168 (129,190) p = 0.058). The postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo 3a 2% versus 6.7%) and hospital stay (median of 2 days), positive surgical margins, continence, and biochemical recurrence rates at 3, 12, and 24 months were not statistically different between the groups. In high-volume centres, the oncological and continence outcomes of RARP post-TURP are not inferior to that of men without prior TURP.


Subject(s)
Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Transurethral Resection of Prostate , Male , Humans , Prostate/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/adverse effects , Matched-Pair Analysis , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatectomy/adverse effects
13.
Am J Case Rep ; 25: e942746, 2024 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566390

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND RARP is an established procedure in treatment of localized prostate cancer. Hemorrhagic complications in the postoperative period are rare, but sometimes life-threatening. Adequate monitoring and prompt intervention in these unusual scenarios rely on clinical judgement and blood and imaging studies. Prostatic fossa pseudoaneurysm formation after RARP is very rare and its etiology is not well known; it may be related to small vessel trauma. It becomes apparent with the development of hematuria 1-6 weeks after surgery. CASE REPORT A 58-year-old man underwent RARP with extended lymph node dissection for intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with bilateral preservation of neurovascular bundles and puboprostatic ligaments. He was discharged on day 2 without complications. In the following 4 weeks he came to the Emergency Department 3 times with hematuria and acute urinary retention. Four weeks after surgery, a pelvic CT angiogram showed a 20-mm pseudoaneurysm in the prostatic fossa, which was embolized by percutaneous angiography, with resolution of symptoms. He was discharged soon thereafter. CONCLUSIONS This case study describes a patient with prostatic fossa pseudoaneurysm after RARP. It was diagnosed 1 month after surgery and effectively managed by percutaneous embolization. Despite being a very rare condition, it must be kept in mind, especially when postoperative hematuria develops 1-6 weeks after surgery. Use of a management algorithm including serial blood tests, CT angiogram, and percutaneous angiography can lead to early detection and avoid life-threatening hemorrhage and overall postoperative morbidity.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm, False , Prostatic Neoplasms , Robotics , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Hematuria/etiology , Hematuria/surgery , Aneurysm, False/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm, False/etiology , Aneurysm, False/therapy , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome
14.
Arch Esp Urol ; 77(2): 158-163, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583008

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the influence of delirium following radical prostatectomy on cognitive function and health perception during the recovery period. METHODS: Data were collected from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution between May 2020 and May 2022. Postoperative delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU), categorising patients into delirium and non-delirium groups. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) were employed to evaluate patients' mental health pre-and post-surgery. Comparative analyses were conducted between patients with and without delirium in the critical care unit, and correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: The study revealed a delirium incidence rate of 19.13%. Patients in the delirium group exhibited significantly higher age and ICU length of stay compared to those without delirium (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in MoCA scores one day before surgery and seven days after surgery, as well as BIPQ scores one day before surgery, five days after surgery and seven days after surgery between the delirium and non-delirium groups (p > 0.05); However, the MoCA scores in the delirium group were significantly lower than those of the non-delirium group on the second and fifth days post-surgery. Additionally, the BIPQ scores in the delirium group were significantly higher than those in the non-delirium group two days after surgery (p < 0.001). A moderate negative correlation was observed between MoCA scores and CAM-ICU scores, and a moderate positive correlation was identified between BIPQ scores and CAM-ICU scores (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients experiencing delirium after radical prostatectomy are at a higher risk of cognitive function impairment and disease threat perception. A significant correlation exists between postoperative delirium and cognitive function as well as health perception.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Emergence Delirium , Male , Humans , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/etiology , Delirium/psychology , Emergence Delirium/complications , Cognition , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Perception
15.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 177, 2024 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630430

ABSTRACT

Lymphocele is one of the most common complications after radical prostatectomy. Multiple authors have proposed the use of vessel sealants or peritoneal interposition techniques as preventive interventions. This study aimed to aggregate and analyze the available literature on different interventions which seek to prevent lymphocele through a Bayesian Network. A systematic review was performed to identify prospective studies evaluating strategies for lymphocele prevention after robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy + pelvic lymph node dissection. Data was inputted into Review Manager 5.4 for pairwise meta-analysis. Data was then used to build a network in R Studio. These networks were used to model 200,000 Markov Chains via MonteCarlo sampling. The results are expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Meta-regression was used to determine coefficient of change and adjust for pelvic lymph node dissection extent. Ten studies providing data from 2211 patients were included. 1097 patients received an intervention and 1114 patients served as controls. Interposition with fenestration had the lowest risk of developing a lymphocele (OR 0.14 [0.04, 0.50], p = 0.003). All interventions, except sealants or patches, had significant decreased odds of lymphocele rates. Meta-analysis of all the included studies showed a decreased risk of developing a lymphocele (OR 0.42 [0.33, 0.53], p < 0.00001) for the intervention group. Perivesical fixation and interposition with fenestration appear to be effective interventions for reducing the overall incidence of lymphocele.


Subject(s)
Lymphocele , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Male , Bayes Theorem , Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects , Lymphocele/etiology , Lymphocele/prevention & control , Network Meta-Analysis , Prospective Studies , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods
16.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 181, 2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662167

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of continued perioperative aspirin at the time of robotic assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP). We performed a retrospective review of our IRB approved institutional database of patients who underwent RASP between 2013 and 2022. Comparative groups included patients taking aspirin in the perioperative period and those not taking aspirin pre-operatively. The primary outcome was any post-operative bleeding related complication using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes included the identification of risk factors for increased blood loss in the entire study population, operative time, and blood transfusion requirement. 143 patients underwent RASP of which 55 (38.5%) patients continued perioperative aspirin therapy and 88 (61.5%) patients did not. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Patients taking perioperative aspirin had a higher rate of hypertension (74.5% vs 58.0%, p = 0.04) and other cardiovascular disease (30.9% vs 11.4%, p = 0.007). Postoperative complications were similar between the groups (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3; p = 0.43). Median blood loss (150 cc vs 150 cc, p = 0.38), percentage drop in hemoglobin (13.4 vs 13.2, p = 0.94) and blood transfusion rate (3.6 vs 1.1, p = 0.56) were also similar between groups. The median blood loss was 150 ml for the whole study population. On regression analysis, neither aspirin nor any other variable was associated with increased blood loss (> 150 ml). Aspirin can be safely continued perioperatively in patients undergoing RASP without any risk of bleeding related complications, blood loss, or increased transfusion rate.


Subject(s)
Aspirin , Laparoscopy , Prostatectomy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Aspirin/adverse effects , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Male , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Blood Loss, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Operative Time , Risk Factors , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
17.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(17): e37975, 2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669407

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain continues to represent an important problem even after minimally invasive robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, which results in discomfort in the postoperative period and sometimes prolongs hospital stays. Regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques are used in addition to systemic analgesics with the multimodal approach in postoperative pain management. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks are becoming increasingly important, especially in minimally invasive surgeries. Another important cause of discomfort is urinary catheter pain. The present randomized controlled study investigated the effect of rectus sheath block on postoperative pain and catheter-related bladder discomfort in robotic prostatectomy operations. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted from March to August 2022. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Approval for the study was granted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee. All individuals provided written informed consent, and adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Condition classification I to III planned for robotic prostatectomy operations under general anesthesia were enrolled. Following computer-assisted randomization, patients were divided into 2 groups, and general anesthesia was induced in all cases. Rectus sheath block was performed under general anesthesia and at the end of the surgery. No fascial plane block was applied to the patients in the non-rectus sheath block (RSB) group.Postoperative pain and urinary catheter pain were assessed using a numerical rating scale. Fentanyl was planned as rescue analgesia in the recovery room. In case of numerical rating scale scores of 4 or more, patients were given 50 µg fentanyl IV, repeated if necessary. The total fentanyl dose administered was recorded in the recovery room. IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia was planned for all patients. All patients' pain (postoperative pain at surgical site and urethral catheter discomfort) scores and total morphine consumption in the recovery unit and during follow-ups on the ward (3, 6, 12, and 24 hours) in the postoperative period were recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were evaluated. Total tramadol consumption during follow-up on the ward was significantly higher in the non-RSB group. Fentanyl consumption in the postanesthesia care unit was significantly higher in the non-RSB group. Total morphine consumption was significantly lower in the RSB group at 0 to 12 hours and 12 to 24 hours. Total opioid consumption was 8.81 mg in the RSB group and 19.87 mg in the non-RSB group. A statistically significant decrease in urethral catheter pain was noted in the RSB group at all time points. CONCLUSION: RSB exhibits effective analgesia by significantly reducing postoperative opioid consumption in robotic prostatectomy operations.


Subject(s)
Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Prostatectomy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Humans , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Male , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Nerve Block/methods , Middle Aged , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Aged , Pain Measurement , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Rectus Abdominis/innervation
19.
BMC Urol ; 24(1): 99, 2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38685008

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of urethral-sparing laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (US-LSP) for the treatment of large-volume (>80 ml) benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with asymptomatic urethral stricture (urethral lumen > 16 Fr) after urethral stricture surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 39 large-volume BPH patients with asymptomatic urethral stricture after urethral stricture surgery who underwent US-LSP from January 2016 to October 2021. Postoperative follow-ups were scheduled at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: All patients affected by significant BPH-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) including 22 cases with asymptomatic anterior urethral stricture and 17 cases with asymptomatic posterior urethral stricture. Median operative time was 118 min (interquartile range [IQR]100-145). Median estimated blood loss was 224 ml (IQR: 190-255). 33 patients(84.6%) avoided continuous bladder irrigation. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients (12.8%), including 4 cases with Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and grade 2 and 1 case with grade 3a. During follow-up, US-LSP presented statistically significant improvements in LUTS compared to baseline (P < 0.05). A total of 25 patients had normal ejaculation preoperatively and 3 patients (12%) complained retrograde ejaculation postoperatively. Two patients (5.1%) reported stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and no patient reported aggravated urethral stricture during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: US-LSP was safe and effective in treating large-volume BPH with asymptomatic urethral stricture after urethral stricture surgery. Meanwhile, US-LSP could reduce the risk of SUI in patients with asymptomatic posterior urethral stricture and maintain ejaculatory function in a high percentage of patients.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Urethral Stricture , Humans , Male , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications , Retrospective Studies , Urethral Stricture/etiology , Urethral Stricture/surgery , Aged , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Middle Aged , Asymptomatic Diseases , Urethra/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/etiology
20.
Urologiia ; (1): 35-40, 2024 Mar.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650404

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the effect of antibacterial prophylaxis using oral fosfomycin during the removal of a urethral catheter after radical prostatectomy on the development of urinary tract infection, severity of leukocyturia and bacteriuria, as well as the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, non-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial was carried out. The main group included 40 patients, and the control group included 37 patients. In the group 1, patients received two doses of oral fosfomycin, 3 g, namely in the evening on the day of catheter removal (the first dose) and 48 hours after catheter removal (the second dose). In the group 2, patients did not receive any antibacterial prophylaxis after urethral catheter removal. The endpoints of the study were confirmed episodes of urinary tract infection within 1 month after removal of the urethral catheter, leukocyturia and bacteriuria in urinalysis/urine culture) and severity of the lower urinary tract symptoms assessed by IPSS questionnaire. RESULTS: In the group 2, urinary tract infection was noted in 17.1%, while in the group 2 only in 2.6% of patients (p=0.032). Leukocyturia and bacteriuria were significantly less common in the group receiving antibacterial prophylaxis with fosfomycin (18.4% vs. 48.6%, respectively; p=0.006). Positive urine culture was observed in 7.9% vs. 25.7%, respectively (p=0.035). Four weeks after removal of the urethral catheter, the average IPSS score was significantly higher in the group 2 (13.2 vs. 9.5 points; p=0.002). There were no cases of allergic reaction and pseudomembranous colitis associated with C. difficile in both groups. Diarrhea cured with sorbents was noted in 2 patients (5.2%) in fosfomycin group. CONCLUSION: Antibacterial prophylaxis using two oral doses of fosfomycin 3 g on the day of urethral catheter removal and 48 hours after catheter removal after radical prostatectomy appears to be an effective scheme that reduces the incidence of urinary tract infection and the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms, and is characterized by a minimal risk of adverse events. It is necessary to carried out further research and develop clear recommendations for antibacterial prevention in urological interventions requiring prolonged urethral catheterization.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Fosfomycin , Prostatectomy , Urinary Catheters , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Fosfomycin/administration & dosage , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Male , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Middle Aged , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Aged , Prospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Device Removal
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...