Short-term outcomes of different modalities of pyloromyotomy versus gastric electrical stimulation in the treatment of gastroparesis: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the short-term outcomes surrounding the efficacy and complication rate between different modalities of pyloromyotomy and gastric electrical stimulation (GES) in the treatment of gastroparesis. METHODS: Comprehensive, computerized research was performed on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We additionally reviewed relevant articles, without any language limitations, published prior to April 15, 2020. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Three studies totaling 196 participants who had received 4 interventions, including single per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP), double POP, laparoscopic pyloromyotomy, and GES, were eligible for analysis. Compared to single POP, double POP achieved a better clinical response with a pooled relative risk (RR) of 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.60, P = .04), while laparoscopic pyloromyotomy and GES showed no difference with a pooled RR of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.74-1.08, P = .23) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.73-1.04, P = .13), respectively. As for the recurrence and complication rates, only GES showed a borderline significance of recurrence in comparison to single POP (RR 2.17, 95% CI, 1.00-4.71, P = .05), while there were no differences in the remainder of the comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: We conducted a detailed comparison of 3 modalities of pyloromyotomy and GES in the treatment of gastroparesis, with the results suggesting that double POP demonstrated better clinical success with similar recurrence and complication rates. In addition, GES may result in more recurrence amongst these interventions.

Peroral Pyloromyotomy.

Peroral pyloromyotomy, an innovative intramural endoscopic surgery procedure, is a successful management option for appropriately selected patients who suffer from medically refractory gastroparesis. Gastroparesis is a debilitating disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, which significantly decreases quality of life and overall survival. This article describes the history and background, the indications for, the diagnosis of, and the preparation, technique, and short-term outcomes of peroral pyloromyotomy.

Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy can be performed safely by senior pediatric surgery trainees without supervision at high volume centers.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Pediatric surgery trainees at our institution perform 15 to 20 supervised laparoscopic pyloromyotomies during their junior year, and are allowed to perform the operation independently without supervision during their senior year. We reviewed the outcomes of laparoscopic pyloromyotomies performed by senior trainees operating without supervision and compared them to experienced pediatric surgeons. METHOD: We did a retrospective reviewed of all unsupervised laparoscopic pyloromyotomies (n = 90) performed by the last 12 pediatric surgery fellows (2012-2018) during their senior year, and the most recent 90 consecutive laparoscopic pyloromyotomies performed by 9 experienced pediatric surgeons. Statistical significance was determined by T-test and Fisher's exact test. Data is expressed as mean (SD) or median (range). A p value of ≤0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Mean age at surgery was 4.7 (SD: 1.6) and 5 (SD: 2.3) weeks in the trainees and surgeons group, respectively (p = 0.38). Mean operative time was 28 (SD: 13) minutes in the trainees group vs. 25 (SD: 10) minutes in the surgeons group (p = 0.09). Intraoperative complications occurred in 3 of 90 (2.7%) cases in the trainees group (three mucosal perforations, all detected during the operation, one repaired laparoscopically, two repaired open), and none in the surgeons group (p = 0.11). One postoperative complication requiring reoperation occurred in the trainees group (omentum eviscerated through an incision site), while none occurred in the surgeons group (p = 0.36). No incomplete pyloromyotomies occurred in either group. The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 1 (1 to 10) and 1 (1 to 6) days in the trainees and surgeons group, respectively (p = 0.63). CONCLUSION: Senior trainees at high-volume training programs can perform unsupervised laparoscopic pyloromyotomies safely as a mean to promote surgical autonomy without compromising patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Implementation of a Quality Control System for Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy in Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: Hurdles and Pitfalls.

BACKGROUND: In 2011, we implemented a new video-based system for quality control of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. More than 3 years later, we evaluated how the implementation had gone and assessed its usability in predicting postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four key point images or short video-segments were to be recorded perioperatively: prepyloromyotomy, parallel-mobility testing, perforation testing, and postpyloromyotomy. Data of all 134 patients undergoing laparoscopic pyloromyotomy from September 2011 to December 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Five pediatric surgeons independently assessed the anonymized operative images for predicting reoperation and time to full-enteral feeding. RESULTS: The percentage of operations during which images were recorded increased from 45% in 2012 to 75% in 2014. Over the study period, one or more images were recorded in 89 of the 134 (66%) patients. In only 17 of 89 patients (19%), all four images were documented. The key point images or videos were made for prepyloromyotomy in 49%, parallel-mobility testing in 85%, perforation testing in 42%, and postpyloromyotomy in 94% of 89 patients. Five patients (3.7%) were reoperated for incomplete pyloromyotomy (N = 4) or mucosal perforation (N = 1). Images were recorded during the first operation in four of the five reoperated patients. The need of reoperation was correctly predicted for two of the four patients. Full-enteral feeding within 24 hours was correctly predicted for 67% of the patients (range: 47-88%). CONCLUSION: The increase in recorded images over the years is promising. The implementation of the quality control system did not contribute to a significant decrease in the complication rate, which was already very low. Still, reoperation or a protracted postoperative course could only be predicted with moderate accuracy from the operative images, therefore, for now the use of perioperative images in a medicolegal setting should be advised against. Improved compliance with image recording and better instructions for evaluating the images might improve the usefulness of perioperative images in, e.g., telementoring, education, and medicolegal practice.