Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 48
Filter
1.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 414(5): 1773-1785, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34958396

ABSTRACT

Nucleic acid tests to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus have been performed worldwide since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. For the quality assessment of testing laboratories and the performance evaluation of molecular diagnosis products, reference materials (RMs) are required. In this work, we report the production of a lentiviral SARS-CoV-2 RM containing approximately 12 kilobases of its genome including common diagnostics targets such as RdRp, N, E, and S genes. The RM was measured with multiple assays using two different digital PCR platforms. To measure the homogeneity and stability of the lentiviral SARS-CoV-2 RM, reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) was used with in-house duplex assays. The copy number concentration of each target gene in the extracted RNA solution was then converted to that of the RM solution. Their copy number values are measured to be from 1.5 × 105 to 2.0 × 105 copies/mL. The RM has a between-bottle homogeneity of 4.80-8.23% and is stable at 4 °C for 1 week and at -70 °C for 6 months. The lentiviral SARS-CoV-2 RM closely mimics real samples that undergo identical pre-analytical processes for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing. By offering accurate reference values for the absolute copy number of viral target genes, the developed RM can be used to improve the reliability of SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Genome, Viral , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/standards , Coronavirus Envelope Proteins/genetics , Coronavirus Envelope Proteins/metabolism , Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins/genetics , Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins/metabolism , Coronavirus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase/genetics , Coronavirus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase/metabolism , Gene Dosage , Gene Expression , Humans , Jurkat Cells , Lentivirus/genetics , Lentivirus/metabolism , Phosphoproteins/genetics , Phosphoproteins/metabolism , RNA, Viral/metabolism , RNA, Viral/standards , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/supply & distribution , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/metabolism , Viral Genome Packaging
2.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 13378, 2021 06 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34183720

ABSTRACT

The highly infectious nature of SARS-CoV-2 necessitates the use of widespread testing to control the spread of the virus. Presently, the standard molecular testing method (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR) is restricted to the laboratory, time-consuming, and costly. This increases the turnaround time for getting test results. This study sought to develop a rapid, near-patient saliva-based test for COVID-19 (Saliva-Dry LAMP) with similar accuracy to that of standard RT-PCR tests. A lyophilized dual-target reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) test with fluorometric detection by the naked eye was developed. The assay relies on dry reagents that are room temperature stable. A device containing a centrifuge, heat block, and blue LED light system was manufactured to reduce the cost of performing the assay. This test has a limit of detection of 1 copy/µL and achieved a positive percent agreement of 100% [95% CI 88.43% to 100.0%] and a negative percent agreement of 96.7% [95% CI 82.78-99.92%] relative to a reference standard test. Saliva-Dry LAMP can be completed in 105 min. Precision, cross-reactivity, and interfering substances analysis met international regulatory standards. The combination of ease of sample collection, dry reagents, visual detection, low capital equipment cost, and excellent analytical sensitivity make Saliva-Dry LAMP particularly useful for resource-limited settings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , RNA, Viral/analysis , Saliva/virology , COVID-19/virology , Fluorometry , Humans , Limit of Detection , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/instrumentation , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/standards , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/instrumentation , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/standards , RNA, Viral/standards , Reference Standards , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Temperature
3.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 413(13): 3411-3419, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33738508

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 in vitro transcribed RNA reference materials (RM), UME RM 2019 and UME RM 2020, were produced by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK), National Metrology Institute (UME), to be used as a quality control material for SARS-CoV-2 measurements, in liquid-frozen and lyophilized forms, respectively. These RNA RMs include ten internationally recommended SARS-CoV-2 target gene fragments (Pasteur-RdRp-IP2, Pasteur-RdRp-IP4, Charite-E, Charite-RdRp, CDC-N1, CDC-N2, China CDC-ORF1ab, China CDC-N, Hong Kong-ORF1b, and Hong Kong-N) for virus detection and one human gene fragment (RNase P) as an internal control. Two different platforms, RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR, were used to characterize UME RM 2019 (UME RM 2020 was only characterized with RT-qPCR). The homogeneity studies were evaluated by RT-qPCR. According to these results, it has been shown that both reference materials are homogeneous for intended use. Short-term studies were also conducted similarly for mimicking transport conditions and UME RM 2020, which is produced in lyophilized form, unlike other reference materials available in the market, provides convenience for users by ensuring that the reference material remains stable for 17 days even at 45 °C temperature. The lyophilized formulation of the reference material had greater stability which would allow it to be shipped without cooling items. The development of such RNA reference materials provides quality control for existing and newly designed RNA-based virus detection tests and it helps the prevention and control of epidemics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/virology , RNA, Viral/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Base Sequence , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/standards , Humans , RNA Stability , RNA, Viral/chemistry , RNA, Viral/standards , Reference Standards , SARS-CoV-2/chemistry
4.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246302, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33591986

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two automatable in-house protocols for high-troughput RNA extraction from nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection have been evaluated. METHODS: One hundred forty one SARS-CoV-2 positive samples were collected during a period of 10-days. In-house protocols were based on extraction with magnetic beads and designed to be used with either the Opentrons OT-2 (OT-2in-house) liquid handling robot or the MagMAXTM Express-96 system (MMin-house). Both protocols were tested in parallel with a commercial kit that uses the MagMAXTM system (MMkit). Nucleic acid extraction efficiencies were calculated from a SARS-CoV-2 DNA positive control. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between both in-house protocols and the commercial kit in their performance to detect positive samples. The MMkit was the most efficient although the MMin-house presented, in average, lower Cts than the other two. In-house protocols allowed to save between 350€ and 400€ for every 96 extracted samples compared to the commercial kit. CONCLUSION: The protocols described harness the use of easily available reagents and an open-source liquid handling system and are suitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection in high throughput facilities.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory/methods , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , RNA, Viral/standards , Automation, Laboratory/economics , Automation, Laboratory/standards , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/economics , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/standards , Costs and Cost Analysis , Humans , RNA, Viral/chemistry , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/economics , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 780, 2021 01 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33436939

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus motivates diverse diagnostic approaches due to the novel causative pathogen, incompletely understood clinical sequelae, and limited availability of testing resources. Given the variability in viral load across and within patients, absolute viral load quantification directly from crude lysate is important for diagnosis and surveillance. Here, we investigate the use of digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for SARS-CoV-2 viral load measurement directly from crude lysate without nucleic acid purification. We demonstrate ddPCR accurately quantifies SARS-CoV-2 standards from purified RNA and multiple sample matrices, including commonly utilized universal transport medium (UTM). In addition, we find ddPCR functions robustly at low input viral copy numbers on nasopharyngeal swab specimens stored in UTM without upfront RNA extraction. We also show ddPCR, but not qPCR, from crude lysate shows high concordance with viral load measurements from purified RNA. Our data suggest ddPCR offers advantages to qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection with higher sensitivity and robustness when using crude lysate rather than purified RNA as input. More broadly, digital droplet assays provide a potential method for nucleic acid measurement and infectious disease diagnosis with limited sample processing, underscoring the utility of such techniques in laboratory medicine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19/virology , Viral Load , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/standards , Humans , Nasal Mucosa/virology , RNA, Viral/chemistry , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/standards , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 2636, 2021 01 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33514761

ABSTRACT

DNA synthesis in vitro has enabled the rapid production of reference standards. These are used as controls, and allow measurement and improvement of the accuracy and quality of diagnostic tests. Current reference standards typically represent target genetic material, and act only as positive controls to assess test sensitivity. However, negative controls are also required to evaluate test specificity. Using a pair of chimeric A/B RNA standards, this allowed incorporation of positive and negative controls into diagnostic testing for the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The chimeric standards constituted target regions for RT-PCR primer/probe sets that are joined in tandem across two separate synthetic molecules. Accordingly, a target region that is present in standard A provides a positive control, whilst being absent in standard B, thereby providing a negative control. This design enables cross-validation of positive and negative controls between the paired standards in the same reaction, with identical conditions. This enables control and test failures to be distinguished, increasing confidence in the accuracy of results. The chimeric A/B standards were assessed using the US Centres for Disease Control real-time RT-PCR protocol, and showed results congruent with other commercial controls in detecting SARS-CoV-2 in patient samples. This chimeric reference standard design approach offers extensive flexibility, allowing representation of diverse genetic features and distantly related sequences, even from different organisms.


Subject(s)
Chimera , Amino Acid Sequence , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , Humans , RNA, Viral/standards , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2/chemistry , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
Anal Chem ; 93(2): 715-721, 2021 01 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33289545

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread worldwide. To meet the urgent and massive demand for the screening and diagnosis of infected individuals, many in vitro diagnostic assays using nucleic acid tests (NATs) have been urgently authorized by regulators worldwide. A reference standard with a well-characterized concentration or titer is of the utmost importance for the study of limit of detection (LoD), which is a crucial feature for a diagnostic assay. Although several reference standards of plasmids or synthetic RNA have already been announced, a reference standard for inactivated virus particles with an accurate concentration is still needed to evaluate the complete procedure. Here, we performed a collaborative study to estimate the NAT-detectable units as a viral genomic equivalent quantity (GEQ) of an inactivated whole-virus SARS-CoV-2 reference standard candidate using digital PCR (dPCR) on multiple commercialized platforms. The median of the quantification results (4.6 × 105 ± 6.5 × 104 GEQ/mL) was treated as the consensus true value of GEQ of virus particles in the reference standard. This reference standard was then used to challenge the LoDs of six officially approved diagnostic assays. Our study demonstrates that an inactivated whole virus quantified by dPCR can serve as a reference standard and provides a unified solution for assay development, quality control, and regulatory surveillance.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , RNA, Viral/analysis , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/standards , Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins/genetics , Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins/metabolism , Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins/standards , Humans , Limit of Detection , Phosphoproteins/genetics , Phosphoproteins/metabolism , Phosphoproteins/standards , Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Polyproteins/genetics , Polyproteins/metabolism , Polyproteins/standards , Quality Control , RNA, Viral/metabolism , RNA, Viral/standards , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Reference Standards , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Viral Proteins/genetics , Viral Proteins/metabolism , Viral Proteins/standards , Virion/genetics , Virion/isolation & purification
9.
Clin Chem ; 66(8): 1030-1046, 2020 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32437513

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The ongoing outbreak of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has posed a challenge for worldwide public health. A reliable laboratory assay is essential both to confirm suspected patients and to exclude patients infected with other respiratory viruses, thereby facilitating the control of global outbreak scenarios. CONTENT: In this review, we focus on the genomic, transmission, and clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2, and comprehensively summarize the principles and related details of assays for SARS-CoV-2. We also explore the quality assurance measures for these assays. SUMMARY: SARS-CoV-2 has some unique gene sequences and specific transmission and clinical features that can inform the conduct of molecular and serological assays in many aspects, including the design of primers, the selection of specimens, and testing strategies at different disease stages. Appropriate quality assurance measures for molecular and serological assays are needed to maintain testing proficiency. Because serological assays have the potential to identify later stages of the infection and to confirm highly suspected cases with negative molecular assay results, a combination of these two assays is needed to achieve a reliable capacity to detect SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/genetics , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Genome, Viral , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antigens, Viral/genetics , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Betacoronavirus/classification , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Humans , Pandemics , Phylogeny , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Quality Control , RNA, Viral/metabolism , RNA, Viral/standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 58(2): 251-260, 2020 01 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31539347

ABSTRACT

Background Our laboratory obtained the ISO 15189 accreditation for the plasmatic HIV-1, HBV and HCV viral load (VL) using the m2000 RealTime™ system, which was recently changed for the platform Panther®. Here, we discuss a strategy for performing method validation/verification very quickly. Methods We performed the mandatory (repeatability, internal quality assessment [IQA], measurement uncertainty [MU]) and optional technical verifications for CE/IVD assays using the flexible scope range A. We also performed the mandatory assays for the validation of HIV-1 VL in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using the flexible scope range B. The change was checked by following up on the turnaround time (TAT). Results The coefficient of variation (CV%) for repeatability and IQA complied with the limit of 0.25 log. The MU results ranged from 0.04 to 0.25 log copies or IU/mL. The comparisons of methods showed excellent correlations (R2 = 0.96 for the three parameters) but a delayed centrifugation on HCV VL showed variations of up to 2 log IU/mL. An excellent linearity for HIV-1 in the CSF was obtained from 1.5 to 5 log copies/mL with R2 = 0.99. The TAT increased (84%-98%) in routine usage. Conclusions The three Aptima assays are well suited for routine laboratory use and can be integrated within less than 2 weeks in accordance with flexible scope range A. Our data allows us to confidently perform HIV-1 VL in CSF following flexible scope range B. Finally, we provide an organizational guide for flexible scope management in molecular virology within a short time frame.


Subject(s)
HIV-1/genetics , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/standards , RNA, Viral/standards , Blood-Borne Infections/diagnosis , Blood-Borne Infections/virology , HIV-1/isolation & purification , Hepacivirus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis B virus/isolation & purification , Humans , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , RNA, Viral/blood , RNA, Viral/cerebrospinal fluid , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reproducibility of Results , Viral Load , pol Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/genetics
12.
J Clin Microbiol ; 57(3)2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30626659

ABSTRACT

A real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR assay with single-copy sensitivity targeting the integrase region of HIV-1 (integrase single-copy assay [iSCA] v1.0) has been widely used to quantify plasma viremia in individuals on antiretroviral therapy (ART). iSCA v1.0 requires the use of an ultracentrifuge, and only about half of the nucleic acid extracted from plasma is assayed for HIV-1 RNA. We sought to simplify sample processing using microcentrifugation and improve assay sensitivity by testing more than 75% of the total extracted nucleic acid for HIV-1 RNA (iSCA v2.0). We evaluated the limit of detection (LoD) of iSCA v2.0 by testing replicates of low-copy plasma HIV-1 RNA standards. By probit analysis, the 95% LoD was 1 copy of HIV-1 RNA per milliliter for a 5-ml plasma sample. To compare the sensitivity of iSCA v1.0 and v2.0, we tested plasma samples with both assays from 60 participants on ART with HIV-1 RNA below 20 cps/ml. Of the 31 samples that had no detectable HIV-1 RNA by iSCA v1.0, 17 (55%) were detectable by v2.0 with an HIV-1 RNA mean value of 3.5 cps/ml. Twenty-nine samples were detectable with both assay versions, but average values of HIV-1 RNA cps/ml were 2.7-fold higher for v2.0 than v1.0. These results support the adoption of a new, more sensitive and simpler single-copy HIV-1 RNA assay (iSCA v2.0) to quantify residual viremia on ART and to assess the impact of experimental interventions designed to decrease HIV-1 reservoirs.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/isolation & purification , RNA, Viral/blood , Viral Load/methods , Viremia/virology , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Integrase/genetics , HIV-1/genetics , Humans , Limit of Detection , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/standards , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sensitivity and Specificity , Viremia/drug therapy
13.
Transfusion ; 58(9): 2171-2174, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30178463

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The emergence of Zika virus (ZIKV) in 2015 to 2016 created a global public health crisis and an urgent need for accurate detection assays. Nucleic acid testing (NAT) is the most specific and sensitive technology for early detection of ZIKV. Various NAT protocols have been created, but until recently, assessment of assay performance and comparative studies were hampered by the lack of available standards and reference reagents. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research/Food and Drug Administration responded to this crisis with the generation of two ZIKV-RNA reference reagents (ZIKV-RRs) for use in the development, validation, and assessment of performance of ZIKV-NAT assays. These reagents were produced from heat-inactivated (HI) ZIKV culture supernatant stock from two strains (PRVABC59 and FSS13025) diluted in dialyzed, defibrinated human plasma and lyophilized for evaluation in collaborative studies. The liquid, HI stock had been shared with the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute (Germany) and were included in the collaborative validation studies for the World Health Organization International Standard for ZIKV (WHO ZIKV IS). RESULTS: NAT-detectable units (NDUs)/mL were determined in a collaborative study that led to the assignment of 5.77 log NDUs/mL for PRVABC59 and 5.54 log NDUs/mL for FSS13025 as the final concentrations of the FDA ZIKV-RRs. CONCLUSION: We have established well-characterized reference reagents for ZIKV to facilitate evaluation of existing NAT assays and development of novel ZIKV assays which are correlated to that of the First WHO ZIKV IS. Vials of the ZIKV-RRs are available to qualified organizations upon request.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/standards , RNA, Viral/standards , Zika Virus Infection/epidemiology , Zika Virus/genetics , Animals , Chlorocebus aethiops , Cryopreservation , Freeze Drying , Humans , Indicators and Reagents , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Public Health , RNA Stability , RNA, Viral/blood , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Reference Standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vero Cells , Viremia/blood , Viremia/diagnosis , Virus Inactivation , World Health Organization , Zika Virus/isolation & purification , Zika Virus Infection/blood , Zika Virus Infection/diagnosis
14.
Transfusion ; 57(12): 2958-2964, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28833188

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a small, nonenveloped, single-stranded, RNA virus of emerging concern in industrialized countries. HEV transmission through transfusion of blood components has been reported, but not via plasma-derived medicinal products (PDMPs) manufactured with virus inactivation and/or removal steps. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of HEV among US source plasma donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Samples were collected from US source plasma donors at centers across the United States and were initially screened for HEV RNA in 96-sample minipools using the Roche cobas HEV test on the cobas 8800 system. Assuming a sensitivity of 18.6 IU/mL, the minipool screening strategy allowed for reliable detection of individual donations with HEV RNA titers of more than 2 × 103 IU/mL. Reactive minipools were resolved to individual donations, which were further analyzed to quantify viral RNA concentration, determine HEV genotype, and immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM HEV antibody status. RESULTS: A total of 128,020 samples were collected from 96 CSL Plasma centers in the United States, representing 27 states. The prevalence of HEV RNA-positive samples was 0.002% with three unique HEV-positive donors identified, all HEV Subgenotype 3a. Virus titers of HEV-positive samples were relatively low (103 -104 IU HEV RNA/mL). One positive donation was HEV IgG seropositive. CONCLUSION: Routine screening of US source plasma donations for HEV would not substantially improve the safety of most PDMPs. The low prevalence and potential viral load of HEV, together with effective virus reduction steps in manufacturing processes, results in a low residual risk and acceptable safety margins for PDMPs derived from US plasma donors.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Blood Donors/statistics & numerical data , Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Plasma Exchange/standards , RNA, Viral/blood , Genotype , Hepatitis E virus/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Prevalence , RNA, Viral/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
15.
Clin Chim Acta ; 466: 138-144, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28111270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The emergence of Zika virus demands accurate laboratory diagnostics. Nucleic acid testing is currently the definitive method for diagnosis of Zika infection. In 2016, an external quality assurance (EQA) for assessing the quality of molecular testing of Zika virus was carried out in China. METHODS: A single armored RNA encapsulating a 4942-nucleotides (nt) long specific RNA sequence of Zika virus was prepared and used as positive samples. A pre-tested EQA panel, consisting of 4 negative and 6 positive samples with different concentrations of armored RNA, was distributed to 38 laboratories that perform molecular detection of Zika virus. RESULTS: A total of 39 data sets (1 laboratory used two test kits in parallel), produced by using commercial (n=38) or laboratory developed (n=1) quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) kits, were received. Of these, 35 (89.7%) had correct results for all 10 samples, and 4 (10.3%) reported at least 1 error (11 in total). The testing errors were all false-negatives, highlighting the need of improvements in detecting sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The EQA reveals that the majority of participating laboratories are proficient in molecular testing of Zika virus.


Subject(s)
RNA, Viral/standards , Zika Virus Infection/diagnosis , Zika Virus/isolation & purification , China , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , False Negative Reactions , Humans , Observer Variation , Quality Control , RNA, Viral/chemical synthesis , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards
16.
J Virol Methods ; 180(1-2): 38-42, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22207081

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to optimise a two-tube reverse transcription triplex quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) combining amplification of two loci with an internal amplification control (IAC) for detection and quantitation of hepatitis E virus (HEV) RNA and to validate its performance on a pool of biological samples. Optimisation was performed on serially diluted "home-made" RNA standards. The limit of detection was determined experimentally as 10 copies/µl of the RNA standard for both amplification targets. The qRT-PCR was validated on a cohort of samples originating from 48 wild boars (Sus scrofa), 17 fallow deer (Dama dama) and 28 mouflons (Ovis musimon), with nested RT-PCR used as a reference method. qRT-PCR was found to be more specific for the detection of HEV RNA in examined samples. HEV RNA was detected in samples of five more animals (one wild boar and four mouflons) in comparison with nested RT-PCR.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Hepatitis E/veterinary , RNA, Viral/analysis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Animals , Deer/virology , Hepatitis E/diagnosis , Hepatitis E/virology , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sheep/virology , Sus scrofa/virology
17.
J Virol Methods ; 176(1-2): 9-13, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21620897

ABSTRACT

Real-time PCR is a significant improvement over viral isolation and immunofluorescence for routinely detecting respiratory viruses. We developed three real-time internally controlled multiplex RT-PCR assays for detecting nine respiratory viruses. An internal control transcript consisting of a chimeric plasmid was synthesised and incorporated into each multiplex to monitor amplification efficiency, including inhibition. Each multiplex assay was developed on the Rotor-Gene 3000 and evaluated using RNA extracts from 126 nasopharyngeal aspirates from 112 pre-term infants. All 44/126 (35%) samples positive by immunofluorescence were confirmed by multiplex RT-PCR. Additionally, respiratory syncytial virus RNA was detected in 5 samples, influenza A virus RNA in 2 samples and thirteen (10%) dual infections by multiplex RT-PCR were noted. Inclusion of the RNA internal control did not affect the amplification efficiency of the target sequences and only 2 of 1256 (0.2%) samples tested over a 12 month period were inhibitory. Together with the improved sensitivity of the internally controlled multiplex RT-PCR assays over the older technology and the ability to detect co-infections, the internal control monitored the efficiency of both the RT and PCR steps and indicated inhibition, saving time and costs on running duplicate samples with a "spiked" inhibition control.


Subject(s)
Infant, Premature, Diseases/virology , RNA Viruses/isolation & purification , RNA, Viral/standards , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Animals , Cell Line , DNA Probes , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Nasopharynx/virology , RNA Virus Infections/virology , RNA Viruses/classification , RNA Viruses/genetics , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Reference Standards , Respiratory System/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , Virus Cultivation
18.
J Clin Microbiol ; 46(6): 2088-91, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18434556

ABSTRACT

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) RNA quantification assays used in nine laboratories of the ACHI(E)V(2E) (A Collaboration on HIV-2 Infection) study group were evaluated. In a blinded experimental design, laboratories quantified three series of aliquots of an HIV-2 subtype A strain, each at a different theoretical viral load. Quantification varied between laboratories, and international standardization of quantification assays is strongly needed.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/virology , HIV-2/physiology , RNA, Viral/standards , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Viral Load/standards , Cooperative Behavior , HIV-2/genetics , HIV-2/isolation & purification , Humans , Internationality , Laboratories/standards , Quality Control , RNA, Viral/blood , Reproducibility of Results
19.
J Clin Virol ; 39(4): 318-21, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17604686

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR for norovirus detection is prone to false-negative results due to inhibitory substances in faeces. An internal control is needed to monitor extraction efficiency and to detect inhibition. OBJECTIVES: To further develop a one-step RT-PCR assay for norovirus detection/genogrouping by addition of MS2 bacteriophage as an internal control. STUDY DESIGN: Our norovirus RT-PCR assay was modified by addition of MS2 phage to the extraction tray and primers/probe for MS2 detection to the reaction mix. The effect of addition of MS2 phage and MS2 primers/probe on the sensitivity/specificity of the PCR assay was examined. RESULTS: The addition of MS2 as an internal control showed no loss of sensitivity or specificity for norovirus detection. CONCLUSIONS: A triplex, one-step, type-specific, real-time RT-PCR with MS2 internal control has been developed for use in routine laboratory diagnosis of norovirus infection.


Subject(s)
Caliciviridae Infections/virology , Gastroenteritis/virology , Norovirus/classification , Norovirus/isolation & purification , RNA, Viral/standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , DNA Primers , Feces/virology , Genotype , Humans , Levivirus/genetics , Levivirus/isolation & purification , Norovirus/genetics , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
20.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 43(1): 69-76, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17536156

ABSTRACT

We organised a collaborative study to calibrate three new ISS reference preparations (ISS: Istituto Superiore di Sanità), one for HCV RNA, one for HIV RNA and one for HBV DNA, to be used for nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAT) in blood testing. Serial dilution of the ISS reference preparations and the respective international standards were tested in different days by each participating laboratory using two commercial NAT assays. Data were collected by the ISS for statistical analysis. Based on the mean potency of the HCV RNA and HIV RNA preparations, calculated from the results provided by the 12 participating laboratories, a definitive concentrations of 5700 IU/mL and 4000 IU/mL, respectively, were assigned to the reference materials. On the contrary, it was not possible to obtain a consensus titre for the HBV DNA reference material. These new Italian reference preparations (HCV RNA ISS/1005 and HIV RNA ISS/1005) calibrated against the respective international standards are available free of charge to any laboratory upon request.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/standards , HIV/genetics , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/standards , RNA, Viral/standards , Virology/standards , Calibration , Internationality , Italy , Reference Standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...