Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 770
Filter
2.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1386110, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38660365

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Artificial intelligence has led to significant developments in the healthcare sector, as in other sectors and fields. In light of its significance, the present study delves into exploring deep learning, a branch of artificial intelligence. Methods: In the study, deep learning networks ResNet101, AlexNet, GoogLeNet, and Xception were considered, and it was aimed to determine the success of these networks in disease diagnosis. For this purpose, a dataset of 1,680 chest X-ray images was utilized, consisting of cases of COVID-19, viral pneumonia, and individuals without these diseases. These images were obtained by employing a rotation method to generate replicated data, wherein a split of 70 and 30% was adopted for training and validation, respectively. Results: The analysis findings revealed that the deep learning networks were successful in classifying COVID-19, Viral Pneumonia, and Normal (disease-free) images. Moreover, an examination of the success levels revealed that the ResNet101 deep learning network was more successful than the others with a 96.32% success rate. Conclusion: In the study, it was seen that deep learning can be used in disease diagnosis and can help experts in the relevant field, ultimately contributing to healthcare organizations and the practices of country managers.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , COVID-19 , Deep Learning , Humans , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , SARS-CoV-2 , Health Care Sector , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Neural Networks, Computer
3.
Br J Radiol ; 95(1130): 20210700, 2022 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34898256

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility to determine regional diagnostic reference levels (RDRLs) for paediatric conventional and CT examinations using the European guidelines and to compare RDRLs derived from weight and age groups, respectively. METHODS: Data were collected from 31 hospitals in 4 countries, for 7 examination types for a total of 2978 patients. RDRLs were derived for each weight and age group, respectively, when the total number of patients exceeded 15. RESULTS: It was possible to derive RDRLs for most, but not all, weight-based and age-based groups for the seven examinations. The result using weight-based and age-based groups differed substantially. The RDRLs were lower than or equal to the European and recently published national DRLs. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to derive RDRLs. However, a thorough review of the clinical indications and methodologies has to be performed previous to data collection. This study does not support the notion that DRLs derived using age and weight groups are exchangeable. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Paediatric DRLs should be derived using weight-based groups with access to the actual weight of the patients. DRLs developed using weight differ markedly from those developed with the use of age. There is still a need to harmonize the method to derive solid DRLs for paediatric radiological examinations.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Reference Levels , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiography , Age Factors , Body Weight , Child , Child, Preschool , Europe , Feasibility Studies , Head/diagnostic imaging , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Exposure , Radiography/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Abdominal/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data
4.
Comput Math Methods Med ; 2021: 9269173, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34795794

ABSTRACT

Early diagnosis of the harmful severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), along with clinical expertise, allows governments to break the transition chain and flatten the epidemic curve. Although reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) offers quick results, chest X-ray (CXR) imaging is a more reliable method for disease classification and assessment. The rapid spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has triggered extensive research towards developing a COVID-19 detection toolkit. Recent studies have confirmed that the deep learning-based approach, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), provides an optimized solution for COVID-19 classification; however, they require substantial training data for learning features. Gathering this training data in a short period has been challenging during the pandemic. Therefore, this study proposes a new model of CNN and deep convolutional generative adversarial networks (DCGANs) that classify CXR images into normal, pneumonia, and COVID-19. The proposed model contains eight convolutional layers, four max-pooling layers, and two fully connected layers, which provide better results than the existing pretrained methods (AlexNet and GoogLeNet). DCGAN performs two tasks: (1) generating synthetic/fake images to overcome the challenges of an imbalanced dataset and (2) extracting deep features of all images in the dataset. In addition, it enlarges the dataset and represents the characteristics of diversity to provide a good generalization effect. In the experimental analysis, we used four distinct publicly accessible datasets of chest X-ray images (COVID-19 X-ray, COVID Chest X-ray, COVID-19 Radiography, and CoronaHack-Chest X-Ray) to train and test the proposed CNN and the existing pretrained methods. Thereafter, the proposed CNN method was trained with the four datasets based on the DCGAN synthetic images, resulting in higher accuracy (94.8%, 96.6%, 98.5%, and 98.6%) than the existing pretrained models. The overall results suggest that the proposed DCGAN-CNN approach is a promising solution for efficient COVID-19 diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/classification , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Deep Learning , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual , Early Diagnosis , False Positive Reactions , Humans , Neural Networks, Computer , Pandemics , ROC Curve , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Software Design , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data
5.
Comput Math Methods Med ; 2021: 3900254, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34594396

ABSTRACT

There have been remarkable changes in our lives and the way we perceive the world with advances in computing technology. Healthcare sector is evolving with the intervention of the latest computer-driven technology and has made a remarkable change in the diagnosis and treatment of various diseases. Due to many governing factors including air pollution, there is a rapid rise in chest-related diseases and the number of such patients is rising at an alarming rate. In this research work, we have employed machine learning approach for the detecting various chest-related problems using convolutional neural networks (CNN) on an open dataset of chest X-rays. The method has an edge over the traditional approaches for image segmentation including thresholding, k-means clustering, and edge detection. The CNN cannot scan and process the whole image at an instant; it needs to recursively scan small pixel spots until it has scanned the whole image. Spatial transformation layers and VGG19 have been used for the purpose of feature extraction, and ReLU activation function has been employed due to its inherent low complexity and high computation efficiency; finally, stochastic gradient descent has been used as an optimizer. The main advantage of the current method is that it retains the essential features of the image for prediction along with incorporating a considerable dimensional reduction. The model delivered substantial improvement over existing research in terms of precision, f-score, and accuracy of prediction. This model if used precisely can be very effective for healthcare practitioners in determining the thoracic or pneumonic symptoms in the patient at an early stage thus guiding the practitioner to start the treatment immediately leading to fast improvement in the health status of the patient.


Subject(s)
Machine Learning , Neural Networks, Computer , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Thoracic Diseases/classification , Thoracic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Computational Biology , Databases, Factual , Humans , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Stochastic Processes , Syndrome
6.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 60(11-12): 465-473, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34486411

ABSTRACT

A chest radiograph (CXR) is not routinely indicated in children presenting with their first episode of wheezing; however, it continues to be overused. A survey was distributed electronically to determine what trainees are taught and their current practice of obtaining a CXR in children presenting with their first episode of wheezing and the factors that influence this practice. Of the 1513 trainees who completed surveys, 35.3% (535/1513) reported that they were taught that pediatric patients presenting with their first episode of wheezing should be evaluated with a CXR. In all, 22.01% (333/1513) indicated that they would always obtain a CXR in these patients, and 13.75% (208/1513) would always obtain a CXR under a certain age (4 weeks to 12 years, median of 2 years). Our study identifies a target audience that would benefit from education to decrease the overuse of CXRs in children.


Subject(s)
Medical Overuse/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Sounds/diagnosis , Unnecessary Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Infant , Male
7.
Urology ; 158: 117-124, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34499969

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate MUSIC-KIDNEY's adherence to the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines regarding the initial evaluation of patient's with clinical T1 (cT1) renal masses. METHODS: We reviewed MUSIC-KIDNEY registry data for patients with newly diagnosed cT1 renal masses to assess for adherence with the 2017 AUA guideline statements regarding recommendations to obtain (1) CMP, (2) CBC, (3) UA, (4) abdominal cross-sectional imaging, and (5) chest imaging. An evaluation consisting of all 5 guideline measures was considered "complete compliance." Variation with guideline adherence was assessed by contributing practice, management strategy, and renal mass size. RESULTS: We identified 1808 patients with cT1 renal masses in the MUSIC-KIDNEY registry, of which 30% met the definition of complete compliance. Most patients received care that was compliant with recommendations to obtain laboratory testing with 1448 (80%), 1545 (85%), and 1472 (81%) patients obtaining a CMP, CBC, and UA respectively. Only 862 (48%) patients underwent chest imaging. Significant variation exists in complete guideline compliance for contributing practices, ranging from 0% to 45% as well as for patients which underwent immediate intervention compared with initial observation (37% vs 23%) and patients with cT1b masses compared with cT1a masses (36% vs 28%). CONCLUSION: Complete guideline compliance in the initial evaluation of patients with cT1 renal masses is poor, which is mainly driven by omission of chest imaging. Significant variation in guideline adherence is seen across practices, as well as patients undergoing an intervention vs observation, and cT1a vs cT1b masses. There are ample quality improvement opportunities to increase adherence and decrease variability with guideline recommendations.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Blood Cell Count/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/blood , Male , Michigan , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality Improvement , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Urinalysis/statistics & numerical data
8.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 658, 2021 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34583679

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Whilst the impact of Covid-19 infection in pregnant women has been examined, there is a scarcity of data on pregnant women in the Middle East. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the impact of Covid-19 infection on pregnant women in the United Arab Emirates population. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out to compare the clinical course and outcome of pregnancy in 79 pregnant women with Covid-19 and 85 non-pregnant women with Covid-19 admitted to Latifa Hospital in Dubai between March and June 2020. RESULTS: Although Pregnant women presented with fewer symptoms such as fever, cough, sore throat, and shortness of breath compared to non-pregnant women; yet they ran a much more severe course of illness. On admission, 12/79 (15.2%) Vs 2/85 (2.4%) had a chest radiograph score [on a scale 1-6] of ≥3 (p-value = 0.0039). On discharge, 6/79 (7.6%) Vs 1/85 (1.2%) had a score ≥3 (p-value = 0.0438). They also had much higher levels of laboratory indicators of severity with values above reference ranges for C-Reactive Protein [(28 (38.3%) Vs 13 (17.6%)] with p < 0.004; and for D-dimer [32 (50.8%) Vs 3(6%)]; with p < 0.001. They required more ICU admissions: 10/79 (12.6%) Vs 1/85 (1.2%) with p=0.0036; and suffered more complications: 9/79 (11.4%) Vs 1/85 (1.2%) with p=0.0066; of Covid-19 infection, particularly in late pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women presented with fewer Covid-19 symptoms but ran a much more severe course of illness compared to non-pregnant women with the disease. They had worse chest radiograph scores and much higher levels of laboratory indicators of disease severity. They had more ICU admissions and suffered more complications of Covid-19 infection, such as risk for miscarriage and preterm deliveries. Pregnancy with Covid-19 infection, could, therefore, be categorised as high-risk pregnancy and requires management by an obstetric and medical multidisciplinary team.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Premature Birth , Radiography, Thoracic , Symptom Assessment , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Abortion, Spontaneous/etiology , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/transmission , Case-Control Studies , Female , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/physiopathology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Pregnancy, High-Risk , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Premature Birth/etiology , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Severity of Illness Index , Symptom Assessment/methods , Symptom Assessment/statistics & numerical data , United Arab Emirates/epidemiology
9.
Pediatrics ; 148(4)2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34556548

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends against the routine use of ß-agonists, corticosteroids, antibiotics, chest radiographs, and viral testing in bronchiolitis, but use of these modalities continues. Our objective for this study was to determine the patient, provider, and health care system characteristics that are associated with receipt of low-value services. METHODS: Using the Virginia All-Payers Claims Database, we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of children aged 0 to 23 months with bronchiolitis (code J21, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision) in 2018. We recorded medications within 3 days and chest radiography or viral testing within 1 day of diagnosis. Using Poisson regression, we identified characteristics associated with each type of overuse. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of children with bronchiolitis received ≥1 form of overuse, including 9% corticosteroids, 17% antibiotics, 20% ß-agonists, 26% respiratory syncytial virus testing, and 18% chest radiographs. Commercially insured children were more likely than publicly insured children to receive a low-value service (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-1.30; P < .0001). Children in emergency settings were more likely to receive a low-value service (aPR 1.24; 95% CI: 1.15-1.33; P < .0001) compared with children in inpatient settings. Children seen in rural locations were more likely than children seen in cities to receive a low-value service (aPR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.11-1.29; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Overuse in bronchiolitis remains common and occurs frequently in emergency and outpatient settings and rural locations. Quality improvement initiatives aimed at reducing overuse should include these clinical environments.


Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis/drug therapy , Medical Overuse/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Prescription Drug Overuse/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bronchiolitis/diagnostic imaging , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Medical Services , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Insurance, Health , Male , Poisson Distribution , Retrospective Studies , Virginia
10.
Pediatrics ; 148(3)2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34344801

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bronchiolitis is a leading cause of pediatric hospitalization in the United States, resulting in significant morbidity and health care resource use. Despite American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations against obtaining chest radiographs (CXRs) for bronchiolitis, variation in care continues. Historically, clinical practice guidelines and educational campaigns have had mixed success in reducing unnecessary CXR use. Our aim was to reduce CXR use for children <2 years with a primary diagnosis of bronchiolitis, regardless of emergency department (ED) disposition or preexisting conditions, from 42.1% to <15% of encounters by March 2020. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was created at our institution in 2012 to standardize bronchiolitis care. Given success with higher reliability interventions in asthma, similar interventions affecting workflow were subsequently pursued with bronchiolitis, starting in 2017, by using quality improvement science methods. The primary outcome was the percent of bronchiolitis encounters with a CXR. The balancing measure was return visits within 72 hours to the ED. Statistical process control charts were used to monitor and analyze data obtained from an internally created dashboard. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2020, our hospital had 12 120 bronchiolitis encounters. Preimplementation baseline revealed a mean of 42.1% for CXR use. Low reliability interventions, like educational campaigns, resulted in unsustained effects on CXR use. Higher reliability interventions were associated with sustained reductions to 23.3% and 18.9% over the last 4 years. There was no change in ED return visits. CONCLUSIONS: High-reliability workflow redesign was more effective in translating American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations into sustained practice than educational campaigns.


Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis/diagnosis , Medical Overuse/prevention & control , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Patient Care Team , Tennessee
11.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(31): e26841, 2021 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34397855

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (SPPTB) is the major contributor to the spread of tuberculosis (TB) infection, and it creates high morbidity and mortality worldwide. The objective of this study was to determine the predictors of delayed sputum smear conversion at the end of the intensive phase of TB treatment in Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.This retrospective study was conducted utilising data of SPPTB patients treated in 5 TB treatment centres located in Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia from 2013 to 2018. Pulmonary TB (PTB) patients included in the study were those who had at least completed the intensive phase of anti-TB treatment with sputum smear results at the end of the 2nd month of treatment. The factors associated with delayed sputum smear conversion were analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis. Predictors of sputum smear conversion at the end of intensive phase were evaluated.A total of 2641 patients from the 2013 to 2018 periods were included in this study. One hundred eighty nine (7.2%) patients were identified as having delayed sputum smear conversion at the end of the intensive phase treatment. Factors of moderate (advanced odd ratio [aOR]: 1.7) and advanced (aOR: 2.7) chest X-ray findings at diagnosis, age range of >60 (aOR: 2.1), year of enrolment 2016 (aOR: 2.8), 2017 (aOR: 3.9), and 2018 (aOR: 2.8), smokers (aOR: 1.5), no directly observed treatment short-course (DOTS) supervisor (aOR: 6.9), non-Malaysian citizens (aOR: 1.5), and suburban home locations (aOR: 1.6) were associated with delayed sputum smear conversion at the end of the intensive phase of the treatment.To improve sputum smear conversion success rate, the early detection of PTB cases has to be fine-tuned so as to reduce late or severe case presentation during diagnosis. Efforts must also be in place to encourage PTB patients to quit smoking. The percentage of patients assigned with DOTS supervisors should be increased while at the same time ensuring that vulnerable groups such as those residing in suburban localities, the elderly and migrant TB patients are provided with proper follow-up treatment and management.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Latent Tuberculosis , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Sputum/microbiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary , Aftercare/methods , Aftercare/standards , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Latent Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Latent Tuberculosis/etiology , Latent Tuberculosis/prevention & control , Malaysia/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Needs Assessment , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/microbiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/therapy , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/transmission
12.
Comput Math Methods Med ; 2021: 5528144, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34194535

ABSTRACT

Pneumonia is an infamous life-threatening lung bacterial or viral infection. The latest viral infection endangering the lives of many people worldwide is the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes COVID-19. This paper is aimed at detecting and differentiating viral pneumonia and COVID-19 disease using digital X-ray images. The current practices include tedious conventional processes that solely rely on the radiologist or medical consultant's technical expertise that are limited, time-consuming, inefficient, and outdated. The implementation is easily prone to human errors of being misdiagnosed. The development of deep learning and technology improvement allows medical scientists and researchers to venture into various neural networks and algorithms to develop applications, tools, and instruments that can further support medical radiologists. This paper presents an overview of deep learning techniques made in the chest radiography on COVID-19 and pneumonia cases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Deep Learning , SARS-CoV-2 , Algorithms , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , Computational Biology , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Mathematical Concepts , Neural Networks, Computer , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data
13.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 16(1): 447, 2021 Jul 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34243795

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thoracic kyphosis is reported to increase with ageing. However, this relationship has not been systematically investigated. Peoples' kyphosis often exceeds 40°, but 40° is the widely accepted cut-off and threshold for normality. Consequently, patients may be misclassified. Accurate restoration of kyphosis is important to avoid complications following spinal surgery. Therefore, specific reference values are needed. The objective of the review is to explore the relationship between thoracic kyphosis and age, provide normative values of kyphosis for different age groups and investigate the influence of gender and ethnicity. METHODS: Two reviewers independently conducted a literature search, including seven databases and the Spine Journal, from inception to April 2020. Quantitative observational studies on healthy adults (18 years of age or older) with no known pathologies, and measuring kyphosis with Cobb's method, a flexicurve, or a kyphometer, were included. Study selection, data extraction, and study quality assessment (AQUA tool) were performed independently by two reviewers. The authors were contacted if clarifications were necessary. Correlation analysis and inferential statistics were performed (Microsoft Excel). The results are presented narratively. A modified GRADE was used for evidence quality assessment. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies (24 moderate-quality, 10 high-quality) were included (n = 7633). A positive moderate correlation between kyphosis and age was found (Spearman 0.52, p < 0.05, T5-T12). Peoples' kyphosis resulted greater than 40° in 65% of the cases, and it was significantly smaller in individuals younger than 40 years old (x < 40) than in those older than 60 years old (x > 60) 75% of the time (p < 0.05). No differences between genders were found, although a greater kyphosis angle was observed in North Americans and Europeans. CONCLUSION: Kyphosis increases with ageing, varying significantly between x < 40 and x > 60. Furthermore, kyphosis appears to be influenced by ethnicity, but not gender. Peoples' thoracic sagittal curvature frequently exceeds 40°. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The review protocol was devised following the PRISMA-P Guidelines, and it was registered on PROSPERO ( CRD42020175058 ) before study commencement.


Subject(s)
Age Factors , Healthy Aging/physiology , Kyphosis/diagnosis , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observational Studies as Topic , Reference Values , Statistics, Nonparametric , Young Adult
14.
J Pediatr ; 238: 290-295.e1, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34284032

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To develop a tool for quantifying health disparity (Health Disparity Index[HDI]) and explore hospital variation measured by this index using chest radiography (CXR) in asthma as the proof of concept. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System database including children with asthma between 5 and 18 years old. Inpatient and emergency department (ED) encounters from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018, with low or moderate severity were included. Exclusions included hospitals with <10 cases in any racial/ethnic group. The HDI measured variation in CXR use among children with asthma based on race/ethnicity. The HDI was calculated as the absolute difference between maximum and minimum percentages of CXR use (range = 0-100) when there was statistical evidence that the percentages were different. RESULTS: Data from 36 hospitals included 16 744 inpatient and 75 805 ED encounters. Overall, 19.7% of encounters had a CXR (34.3% for inpatient; 16.5% for ED). In inpatient encounters, 47.2% (17/36) of hospitals had a significant difference in imaging across racial/ethnic groups. Of these, the median hospital-level HDI was 19.4% (IQR 13.5-20.1). In ED encounters, 78.8% (28/36) of hospitals had a statistically significant difference in imaging across racial/ethnic groups, with a median hospital-level HDI of 10.2% (IQR 8.3-14.1). There was no significant association between the inpatient HDI and ED HDI (P = .46). CONCLUSIONS: The HDI provides a practical measure of disparity. To improve equity in healthcare, metrics are needed that are intuitive, accurate, usable, and actionable. Next steps include application of this index to other conditions.


Subject(s)
Asthma/diagnostic imaging , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Asthma/ethnology , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Status Disparities , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Procedures and Techniques Utilization , Proof of Concept Study , Retrospective Studies
15.
Scott Med J ; 66(3): 101-107, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34176342

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To devise a novel, simple chest x-ray (CXR) scoring system which would help in prognosticating the disease severity and ability to predict comorbidities and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: We included a total of 343 consecutive hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in this study. The chest x-rays of these patients were scored retrospectively by three radiologists independently. We divided CXR in to six zones (right upper, mid & lower and left, upper mid & lower zones). We scored each zone as- 0, 1 or 2 as follows- if that zone was clear (0) Ground glass opacity (1) or Consolidation (2). A total of score from 0 to 12 could be obtained. RESULTS: A CXR score cut off ≥3 independently predicted mortality. Along with a relatively higher NPV ≥80%, it reinforced the importance of CXR score is a screening tool to triage patients according to risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that Pennine score is a simple tool which can be adapted by various countries, experiencing a large surge in number of patients, to decide which patient would need a tertiary Hospital referral/admission as opposed to patients that can be managed locally or at basic/primary care hospitals.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Thoracic , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/mortality , Comorbidity , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
16.
Am J Emerg Med ; 49: 310-314, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34182276

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although chest x-ray (CXR) is often used as a screening tool for thoracic injury in adult blunt trauma assessment, its screening performance is unclear. Using chest CT as the referent standard, we sought to determine the screening performance of CXR for injury. METHODS: We analyzed data from the NEXUS Chest CT study, in which we prospectively enrolled blunt trauma patients older than 14 years who received chest imaging as part of their evaluation at nine level I trauma centers. For this analysis, we included patients who had both CXR and chest CT. We used CT as the referent standard and categorized injuries as clinically major or minor according to an a priori expert panel classification. RESULTS: Of 11,477 patients enrolled, 4501 had both CXR and chest CT; 1496 (33.2%) were found to have injury, of which 256 (17%) were classified as major injury. CXR missed injuries in 818 patients (54.7%), of which 63 (7.7%) were classified as major injuries. For injuries of major clinical significance, CXR had a sensitivity of 75.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 69.6-80.4%), specificity of 86.2% (95% CI 85.1-87.2%), negative predictive value of 98.3 (95%CI 97.9-98.6%), and positive predictive value of 24.7 (95%CI 22.9-26.7%). For any injury CXR had a sensitivity of 45.3% (95% CI 42.8-47.9%), specificity of 96.6% (95% CI 95.9-97.2%), negative predictive value of 78% (95% CI 77.2-78.8%), and positive predictive value of 86.9% (95% CI 84.5-89.0%). The most common missed major injuries were pneumothorax (30/185; 16.2%), spinal fractures (19/39; 48.7%), and hemothorax (8/70; 11.4%). The most common missed minor injuries were rib fractures (381/836; 45.6%), pulmonary contusion (203/462; 43.9%), and sternal fractures (153/229; 66.8%). CONCLUSIONS: When used alone, without other trauma screening criteria, CXR has poor screening performance for blunt thoracic injury.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/standards , Radiography, Thoracic/standards , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Mass Screening/instrumentation , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/complications , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/physiopathology
17.
BMC Med Imaging ; 21(1): 95, 2021 06 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34098887

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a promising tool for cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) measurement that has been technically validated but not clinically evaluated on a large dataset. We observed and validated AI and manual methods for CTR measurement using a large dataset and investigated the clinical utility of the AI method. METHODS: Five thousand normal chest x-rays and 2,517 images with cardiomegaly and CTR values, were analyzed using manual, AI-assisted, and AI-only methods. AI-only methods obtained CTR values from a VGG-16 U-Net model. An in-house software was used to aid the manual and AI-assisted measurements and to record operating time. Intra and inter-observer experiments were performed on manual and AI-assisted methods and the averages were used in a method variation study. AI outcomes were graded in the AI-assisted method as excellent (accepted by both users independently), good (required adjustment), and poor (failed outcome). Bland-Altman plot with coefficient of variation (CV), and coefficient of determination (R-squared) were used to evaluate agreement and correlation between measurements. Finally, the performance of a cardiomegaly classification test was evaluated using a CTR cutoff at the standard (0.5), optimum, and maximum sensitivity. RESULTS: Manual CTR measurements on cardiomegaly data were comparable to previous radiologist reports (CV of 2.13% vs 2.04%). The observer and method variations from the AI-only method were about three times higher than from the manual method (CV of 5.78% vs 2.13%). AI assistance resulted in 40% excellent, 56% good, and 4% poor grading. AI assistance significantly improved agreement on inter-observer measurement compared to manual methods (CV; bias: 1.72%; - 0.61% vs 2.13%; - 1.62%) and was faster to perform (2.2 ± 2.4 secs vs 10.6 ± 1.5 secs). The R-squared and classification-test were not reliable indicators to verify that the AI-only method could replace manual operation. CONCLUSIONS: AI alone is not yet suitable to replace manual operations due to its high variation, but it is useful to assist the radiologist because it can reduce observer variation and operation time. Agreement of measurement should be used to compare AI and manual methods, rather than R-square or classification performance tests.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Cardiomegaly/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Cavity/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bias , Deep Learning , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
18.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(21): e26034, 2021 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34032725

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: To determine the role of ultra-low dose chest computed tomography (uld CT) compared to chest radiographs in patients with laboratory-confirmed early stage SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.Chest radiographs and uld CT of 12 consecutive suspected SARS-CoV-2 patients performed up to 48 hours from hospital admission were reviewed by 2 radiologists. Dosimetry and descriptive statistics of both modalities were analyzed.On uld CT, parenchymal abnormalities compatible with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia were detected in 10/12 (83%) patients whereas on chest X-ray in, respectively, 8/12 (66%) and 5/12 (41%) patients for reader 1 and 2. The average increment of diagnostic performance of uld CT compared to chest X-ray was 29%. The average effective dose was, respectively, of 0.219 and 0.073 mSv.Uld CT detects substantially more lung injuries in symptomatic patients with suspected early stage SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia compared to chest radiographs, with a significantly better inter-reader agreement, at the cost of a slightly higher equivalent radiation dose.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Predictive Value of Tests , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Thoracic/adverse effects , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Radiometry/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
19.
BMC Fam Pract ; 22(1): 83, 2021 04 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33926382

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Possible cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection were diagnosed in primary care in Madrid, some of these cases had pneumonia. Most of the SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia published data came from hospitalised patients. This study set out to describe clinical characteristics of patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia diagnosed in primary care across age groups and type of pneumonia. METHODS: Observational retrospective study obtaining clinical data from the electronic health records of patients who were followed-up by SARS-CoV-2 possible infection in a primary care practice in Madrid. All the cases were collected by in-person or remote consultation during the 10th March to the 7th of April. EXPOSURE: Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia by chest X-ray ordered by the GP. Main outcomes and measures: Symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, physical examination and diagnostic tests as a blood test, nasopharyngeal swab results for RT-PCR (Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction) and chest X-ray results. RESULTS: The overall SARS-CoV-2 pneumonias collected were 172 (female 87 [50.6%], mean age 60.5 years standard deviation [SD] 17.0). Comorbidities were body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 (90 [52.3%]), hypertension (83 [48.3%]), dyslipidaemia (68 [39.5%]) and diabetes (33 [19.2%]). The sample was stratified by age groups (< 50 years, 50-75 years and ≥ 75 years). Clinical manifestations at onset were fever (144 [83.7%]), cough (140 [81.4%]), dyspnoea (103 [59.9%]) and gastrointestinal disturbances (72 [41.9%]). Day 7.8 (SD:4.1) from clinical onset was the mean day of pneumonia diagnosis. Bilateral pneumonia was more prevalent than unilateral (126 [73.3%] and 46 [26.7%]). Patients with unilateral pneumonia were prone to higher pulse oximetry (96% vs 94%, p < 0.001). We found differences between unilateral and bilateral cases in C-reactive protein (29.6 vs 81.5 mg/L, p < 0.001), and lymphocytes (1400.0 vs 1000.0E3/ml, p < 0.001). Complications were registered: 42 (100%) of patients ≥ 75 years were admitted into hospital; pulmonary embolism was only present at bilateral pneumonia (7 patients [5.6%]) and death occurred in 1 patient with unilateral pneumonia (2.2%) vs 10 patients (7.9%) with bilateral pneumonia ( p 0.170). CONCLUSION: Clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia were fever, cough and dyspnoea; this was especially clear in the elderly. We described different characteristics between unilateral and bilateral pneumonia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral , Primary Health Care , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Symptom Assessment , Age Factors , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19 Testing/methods , Causality , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology , Symptom Assessment/methods , Symptom Assessment/statistics & numerical data
20.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(16): e25663, 2021 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33879750

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Along with recent developments in deep learning techniques, computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) has been growing rapidly in the medical imaging field. In this work, we evaluate the deep learning-based CAD algorithm (DCAD) for detecting and localizing 3 major thoracic abnormalities visible on chest radiographs (CR) and to compare the performance of physicians with and without the assistance of the algorithm. A subset of 244 subjects (60% abnormal CRs) was evaluated. Abnormal findings included mass/nodules (55%), consolidation (21%), and pneumothorax (24%). Observer performance tests were conducted to assess whether the performance of physicians could be enhanced with the algorithm. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and the area under the jackknife alternative free-response ROC (JAFROC) were measured to evaluate the performance of the algorithm and physicians in image classification and lesion detection, respectively. The AUCs for nodule/mass, consolidation, and pneumothorax were 0.9883, 1.000, and 0.9997, respectively. For the image classification, the overall AUC of the pooled physicians was 0.8679 without DCAD and 0.9112 with DCAD. Regarding lesion detection, the pooled observers exhibited a weighted JAFROC figure of merit (FOM) of 0.8426 without DCAD and 0.9112 with DCAD. DCAD for CRs could enhance physicians' performance in the detection of 3 major thoracic abnormalities.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning/statistics & numerical data , Lung Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Thoracic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Area Under Curve , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Pneumothorax/diagnostic imaging , ROC Curve , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...