Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 42.798
Filter
1.
Clin Respir J ; 18(5): e13760, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725324

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Radiation therapy (RT) may increase the risk of second cancer. This study aimed to determine the association between exposure to radiotherapy for the treatment of thoracic cancer (TC) and subsequent secondary lung cancer (SLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (from 1975 to 2015) was queried for TC. Univariate Cox regression analyses and multiple primary standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were used to assess the risk of SLC. Subgroup analyses of patients stratified by latency time since TC diagnosis, age at TC diagnosis, and calendar year of TC diagnosis stage were also performed. Overall survival and SLC-related death were compared among the RT and no radiation therapy (NRT) groups by using Kaplan-Meier analysis and competitive risk analysis. RESULTS: In a total of 329 129 observations, 147 847 of whom had been treated with RT. And 6799 patients developed SLC. Receiving radiotherapy was related to a higher risk of developing SLC for TC patients (adjusted HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.19-1.32; P < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of developing SLC in TC patients with RT (3.8%) was higher than the cumulative incidence (2.9%) in TC patients with NRT(P). The incidence risk of SLC in TC patients who received radiotherapy was significantly higher than the US general population (SIR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.14-1.23; P < 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy for TC was associated with higher risks of developing SLC compared with patients unexposed to radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Second Primary , SEER Program , Thoracic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Incidence , Prognosis , Thoracic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Thoracic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Adult
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10637, 2024 05 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724569

ABSTRACT

Hadron therapy is an advanced radiation modality for treating cancer, which currently uses protons and carbon ions. Hadrons allow for a highly conformal dose distribution to the tumour, minimising the detrimental side-effects due to radiation received by healthy tissues. Treatment with hadrons requires sub-millimetre spatial resolution and high dosimetric accuracy. This paper discusses the design, fabrication and performance tests of a detector based on Gas Electron Multipliers (GEM) coupled to a matrix of thin-film transistors (TFT), with an active area of 60 × 80 mm2 and 200 ppi resolution. The experimental results show that this novel detector is able to detect low-energy (40 kVp X-rays), high-energy (6 MeV) photons used in conventional radiation therapy and protons and carbon ions of clinical energies used in hadron therapy. The GEM-TFT is a compact, fully scalable, radiation-hard detector that measures secondary electrons produced by the GEMs with sub-millimetre spatial resolution and a linear response for proton currents from 18 pA to 0.7 nA. Correcting known detector defects may aid in future studies on dose uniformity, LET dependence, and different gas mixture evaluation, improving the accuracy of QA in radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Radiometry , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiometry/methods , Humans , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy/standards , Radiotherapy/instrumentation , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Electrons , Radiotherapy Dosage , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Equipment Design , Proton Therapy/instrumentation , Proton Therapy/methods
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2410421, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739392

ABSTRACT

Importance: Patients with head and neck cancer who undergo radiotherapy can develop chronic radiation-induced xerostomia. Prior acupuncture studies were single center and rated as having high risk of bias, making it difficult to know the benefits of acupuncture for treating radiation-induced xerostomia. Objective: To compare true acupuncture (TA), sham acupuncture (SA), and standard oral hygiene (SOH) for treating radiation-induced xerostomia. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, blinded, 3-arm, placebo-controlled trial was conducted between July 29, 2013, and June 9, 2021. Data analysis was performed from March 9, 2022, through May 17, 2023. Patients reporting grade 2 or 3 radiation-induced xerostomia 12 months or more postradiotherapy for head and neck cancer were recruited from community-based cancer centers across the US that were part of the Wake Forest National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base. Participants had received bilateral radiotherapy with no history of xerostomia. Interventions: Participants received SOH and were randomized to TA, SA, or SOH only. Participants in the TA and SA cohorts were treated 2 times per week for 4 weeks. Those experiencing a minor response received another 4 weeks of treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient-reported outcomes for xerostomia (Xerostomia Questionnaire, primary outcome) and quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) were collected at baseline, 4 (primary time point), 8, 12, and 26 weeks. All analyses were intention to treat. Results: A total of 258 patients (201 men [77.9%]; mean [SD] age, 65.0 [9.16] years), participated from 33 sites across 13 states. Overall, 86 patients were assigned to each study arm. Mean (SD) years from diagnosis was 4.21 (3.74) years, 67.1% (n = 173) had stage IV disease. At week 4, Xerostomia Questionnaire scores revealed significant between-group differences, with lower Xerostomia Questionnaire scores with TA vs SOH (TA: 50.6; SOH: 57.3; difference, -6.67; 95% CI, -11.08 to -2.27; P = .003), and differences between TA and SA (TA: 50.6; SA: 55.0; difference, -4.41; 95% CI, -8.62 to -0.19; P = .04) yet did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for multiple comparisons. There was no significant difference between SA and SOH. Group differences in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores revealed statistically significant group differences at week 4, with higher scores with TA vs SOH (TA: 101.6; SOH: 97.7; difference, 3.91; 95% CI, 1.43-6.38; P = .002) and at week 12, with higher scores with TA vs SA (TA: 102.1; SA: 98.4; difference, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.10-6.18; P = .005) and TA vs SOH (TA: 102.1; SOH: 97.4; difference, 4.61; 95% CI, 1.99-7.23; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this trial suggest that TA was more effective in treating chronic radiation-induced xerostomia 1 or more years after the end of radiotherapy than SA or SOH. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02589938.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Radiation Injuries , Xerostomia , Humans , Xerostomia/etiology , Xerostomia/therapy , Male , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Radiation Injuries/therapy , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Radiotherapy/adverse effects
4.
Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftalmol ; 99(5): 209-212, May. 2024. mapas
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-VR-72

ABSTRACT

La neuromiotonía ocular es una patología poco frecuente caracterizada por episodios recurrentes de diplopía binocular ocasionada por una contracción paroxística mantenida de uno o más músculos extraoculares inervados por un mismo nervio craneal, espontáneamente o inducidos por una versión concreta mantenida en el tiempo, normalmente relacionado con un antecedente de radioterapia local intracraneal. Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 46 años que presenta episodios de diplopía binocular recurrentes, diagnosticada de neuromiotonía ocular del VI nervio craneal izquierdo a los 8 años de padecer un cáncer de cavum tratado mediante radioterapia local y en completa remisión. Aunque es poco frecuente, la radiación a nivel de cavum debe tenerse en cuenta como potencial causa de neuromiotonía ocular, por su proximidad a la base del cráneo y su estrecha relación con el trayecto de los nervios oculomotores, especialmente el VI par craneal, como el caso que se presenta en este artículo.(AU)


Ocular neuromyotonia is an infrequent disorder characterised by recurrent episodes of binocular diplopia caused by paroxysmal contraction of one or several extraocular muscles innervated by the same cranial nerve. It can be triggered spontaneously or caused by prolonged contraction of specific eye muscle(s) and is usually related to a local intracranial radiotherapy antecedent. We report the case of a 46-year-old woman who developed intermittent episodes of binocular diplopia 8 years after radiotherapy for a nasopharyngeal carcinoma. After a complete neuro-ophthalmic assessment we diagnosed the case as an abducens nerve neuromyotonia. Although it is infrequent, radiotherapy to the nasopharynx is a possible cause of ocular neuromyotonia, due to the proximity to the base of the skull and extraocular motor nerve pathways, especially that of the VI cranial nerve, as is the case presented in this article, about a patient whose history is a nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with local radiotherapy.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Isaacs Syndrome , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Diplopia , Radiotherapy , Vision, Ocular , Ophthalmology , Eye Diseases , Inpatients , Physical Examination
5.
Jt Dis Relat Surg ; 35(2): 455-461, 2024 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38727129

ABSTRACT

Case reports of plexopathy after prostate cancer are usually neoplastic. Radiation-induced lumbosacral plexopathy and insufficiency fractures have clinical significance due to the need to differentiate them from tumoral invasions, metastases, and spinal pathologies. Certain nuances, including clinical presentation and screening methods, help distinguish radiation-induced plexopathy from tumoral plexopathy. This case report highlights the coexistence of these two rare clinical conditions. Herein, we present a 78-year-old male with a history of radiotherapy for prostate cancer who developed right foot drop, severe lower back and right groin pain, difficulty in standing up and walking, and tingling in both legs over the past month during remission. The diagnosis of lumbosacral plexopathy and pelvic insufficiency fracture was made based on magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and electroneuromyography. The patient received conservative symptomatic treatment and was discharged with the use of a cane for mobility. Radiation-induced lumbosacral plexopathy following prostate cancer should be kept in mind in patients with neurological disorders of the lower limbs. Pelvic insufficiency fracture should also be considered if the pain does not correspond to the clinical findings of plexopathy. These two pathologies, which can be challenging to diagnose, may require surgical or complex management approaches. However, in this patient, conservative therapies led to an improvement in quality of life and a reduction in the burden of illness.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Stress , Lumbosacral Plexus , Prostatic Neoplasms , Radiation Injuries , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , Lumbosacral Plexus/injuries , Lumbosacral Plexus/radiation effects , Lumbosacral Plexus/pathology , Fractures, Stress/etiology , Fractures, Stress/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Pelvic Bones/pathology , Pelvic Bones/diagnostic imaging , Pelvic Bones/radiation effects , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Radiotherapy/adverse effects
6.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 556, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702617

ABSTRACT

Radiotherapy is a mainstay of cancer treatment. The clinical response to radiotherapy is heterogeneous, from a complete response to early progression. Recent studies have explored the importance of patient characteristics in response to radiotherapy. In this editorial, we invite contributions for a BMC Cancer collection of articles titled 'Advances in personalized radiotherapy' towards the improvement of treatment response.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Precision Medicine , Humans , Precision Medicine/methods , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy/trends , Treatment Outcome
7.
Nutrients ; 16(9)2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38732610

ABSTRACT

Oncological patients show intense catabolic activity, as well as a susceptibility to higher nutritional risk and clinical complications. Thus, tools are used for monitoring prognosis. Our objective was to analyze the nutrition prognosis of patients who underwent radiotherapy, correlating it with outcomes and complications. We performed a retrospective transversal study based on secondary data from hospital records of patients who started radiotherapy between July 2022 and July 2023. We established Prognostic Scores through a combination of Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and a Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), assessed at the beginning and end of treatment. Score 3 patients, with PNI ≤ 45.56 and an SGA outcome of malnutrition, initially presented a higher occurrence of odynophagia, later also being indicative of reduced diet volume, treatment interruption, and dysphagia. SGA alone showed sensitivity to altered diet volume, dysphagia, and xerostomia in the second assessment. Besides this, PNI ≤ 45.56 also indicated the use of alternative feeding routes, treatment interruption, and hospital discharge with more complications. We conclude that the scores could be used to indicate complications; however, further studies on combined biomarkers are necessary.


Subject(s)
Malnutrition , Nutrition Assessment , Nutritional Status , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Aged , Malnutrition/etiology , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult
8.
Psicooncología (Pozuelo de Alarcón) ; 21(1): 135-142, abr.-2024. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-232433

ABSTRACT

Introducción: los meningiomas forman el 27% de los tumores de encéfalo en población adulta. La radioterapia es uno de los tratamientos para tumores primarios del SNC más efectivos, en el cual se administran altas dosis de radiación que destruye el ADN de las células cancerosas para detener su multiplicación o lentificar su crecimiento. Para este tratamiento es necesaria la inmovilización del paciente, que se asegura por medio de máscaras termoplásticas que fijan al paciente a la camilla del acelerador lineal. Este tipo de inmovilización ha representado una incidencia de ansiedad significativa previa al tratamiento y durante el mismo, puede causar niveles altos de estrés, miedo, malestar físico, dolor e incluso claustrofobia. Tomando en cuenta estos aspectos, como preparación psicológica para el tratamiento se sugiere ofrecer información clara previa y durante la simulación, identificar a los pacientes con niveles altos de ansiedad, y brindar estrategias cognitivas y conductuales para regular la misma. Objetivo: Describir un reporte de caso de preparación para radioterapia en SNC. Método: Se presenta el caso de una mujer de 61 años de edad que fue referida a psico-oncología con el objetivo de la preparación psicológica para radioterapia en SNC. El motivo de la referencia a psico-oncología fue evitar la sedación durante la radioterapia debido a los altos niveles de ansiedad que presentaba la paciente. Se realizaron dos sesiones de preparación psicológica en donde se incluyeron estrategias psicoeducativas, de desensibilización sistemática y respiración diafragmática. Resultados: La paciente disminuyó el reporte subjetivo de ansiedad, logró terminar las 25 sesiones de radioterapia sin necesidad de sedación. Conclusión: La preparación psicológica utilizada en esta paciente fue efectiva para disminuir ansiedad. Es importante realizar estudios aleatorizados y controlados para conocer realmente la efectividad.(AU)


Introduction:Meningiomas represent 27% of brain tumors in adults. Radiotherapy is one of the most frequent treatments for CNS tumors, in which high radiation doses destroy cancer cell’s DNA in order to stop their multiplication or to slow their growth. Patient’s inmovilization is necessary in this treatment, so he has to be attached to treatment bed with a thermogenic mask. This inmovilization has represented significant anxiety prior and during treatment, it can also represent a trigger for stress, fears, physical symptoms, pain and even claustrophobia. Considering this, a psychological preparation is suggested before radiotherapy. It is suggested o include clear information before and during simulation, and to identify patients with high levels of anxiety, and to deliver cognitive and behavioral strategies to regulate it. Aim: to describe a case report of a psychological preparation for CNS radiotherapy. Method: A case of a 61 year old woman who was referred to psycho-oncology service with the aim of psychological preparation for CNS radiation. The reason this patient was referred was to avoid sedation during treatment due to high levels of anxiety. Psychologic preparation consisted in two sessions that included psychoeducational, systematic desensibilization and diaphragmatic breathing strategies. Results: Subjective anxiety report was reduced with psychologic preparation, and the patient finished 25 sessions of radiotherapy without sedation. Conclusion: Psychological preparation in this patient was efective in anxiety reduction. It is important to design randomized controled studies in order to know the effectiveness of these strategies.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy , Behavioral Medicine , Psycho-Oncology , Meningioma/drug therapy , Patients/psychology , Medical Oncology , Inpatients , Physical Examination , Neoplasms/psychology
9.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 26(4): 872-879, Abr. 2024. ilus, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-VR-50

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Local recurrence of prostate cancer after low-dose rate brachytherapy is a clinical problem with limited salvage treatment options. This prospective study evaluated the tolerability and outcome of salvage external beam radiation therapy (S-EBRT) for locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary low-dose rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-BT). Materials and methods: Between October 2012 and 2022, 18 patients with biopsy-proven locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary LDR-BT and received S-EBRT. We evaluated biochemical failure (BF), overall survival (OS) and acute/late gastrointestinal and urinary toxicities (CTCAE v5.0 or CTCAE v4, only before 2017). Results: Median follow-up was 32 months (range, 5–124). The median age was at S-EBRT 68 years (range 59–79). 34% (6/18) were low risk, 44% (8/18) intermediate risk, 5% (1/18) high risk, and 17% (3/18) not specified. All patients were treated with IMRT/VMAT and received 60 Gy (2.5 Gy/fraction) to the prostate and 40% (7/18) 55.2 Gy (2,3 Gy/fx) to the seminal vesicles. 56% received ADT The 3-year OS and biochemical relapse-free survival after S-EBRT were 100% and 89%, respectively, with a median PSA nadir 0,035 ng/mL (0,01–0,34). Acute cystitis was present in 72% (13/18) of patients (27% of Grade > 2). Urethritis was present in 78% (14/18) patients (16% of cases Grade > 3), and acute rectitis occurred in 22% (4/18) of patients (no cases Grade > 3). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer with S-EBRT could provide adequate disease control safely and be used as an additional treatment in the natural history of prostate cancer patients. However, the results are still early and the sample is small; larger studies with longer follow-up would be mandatory.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Small Doses , Brachytherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
10.
In Vivo ; 38(3): 1397-1404, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688612

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Aiming to resolve debates on honey's efficacy for radiotherapy-induced severe oral mucositis in head and neck cancer, we conducted a meta-analysis focused on randomized trials, primarily assessing severe mucositis incidence. Secondary outcomes included weight loss, pain management, and honey types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, WOS, and the Cochrane Library up to December 2023. The analysis concentrated on randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of honey, targeting the incidence of mucositis as the main outcome. Additional outcomes explored were weight loss, intolerable pain, and the specific types of honey used in interventions. Data analysis was performed using CMA software, and a funnel plot was employed to identify publication bias. RESULTS: The analysis of 176 records resulted in the inclusion of 10 studies with 599 patients receiving radiotherapy. The research showed that honey significantly reduced the occurrence of grade 3-4 mucositis (severe mucositis), provided significant pain relief, and had a positive effect on reducing weight loss. Regarding the type of honey used, no significant differences were found in their effectiveness in alleviating severe mucositis. CONCLUSION: Honey serves as an effective intervention for individuals with oral mucositis. It can be considered as an adjuvant in the management of clinical radiotherapy-associated oral mucositis, particularly for patients requiring prolonged use of anti-analgesic or antifungal medications.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Honey , Stomatitis , Humans , Stomatitis/etiology , Stomatitis/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
11.
Chronobiol Int ; 41(4): 587-597, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606920

ABSTRACT

The timing of radiotherapy (RT) delivery has been reported to affect both cancer survival and treatment toxicity. However, the association among the timing of RT delivery, survival, and toxicity in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) has not been investigated. We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with LA-NPC who received definitive RT at multiple institutions. The median RT delivery daytime was categorized as morning (DAY) and night (NIGHT). Seasonal variations were classified into the darker half of the year (WINTER) and brighter half (SUMMER) according to the sunshine duration. Cohorts were balanced according to baseline characteristics using propensity score matching (PSM). Survival and toxicity outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression models. A total of 355 patients were included, with 194/161 in DAY/NIGHT and 187/168 in WINTER/SUMMER groups. RT delivered during the daytime prolonged the 5-year overall survival (OS) (90.6% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.009). However, the significance of the trend was lost after PSM (p = 0.068). After PSM analysis, the DAY cohort derived a greater benefit in 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (85.6% vs. 73.4%, p = 0.021) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (89.2% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.051) in comparison with the NIGHT subgroup. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that daytime RT was an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, and DMFS. Furthermore, daytime RT delivery was associated with an increase in the incidence of leukopenia and radiation dermatitis. RT delivery in SUMMER influenced only the OS significantly (before PSM: p = 0.051; after PSM: p = 0.034). There was no association between toxicity and the timing of RT delivery by season. In LA-NPC, the daytime of radical RT served as an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, RT administered in the morning resulted in more severe toxic side effects than that at night, which needs to be confirmed in a future study.


Subject(s)
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , Propensity Score , Humans , Male , Female , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Middle Aged , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Adult , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Time Factors , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy/methods , Seasons
13.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 174: 116532, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574625

ABSTRACT

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy, a groundbreaking immunotherapy. However, it faces formidable challenges in treating solid tumors, grappling with issues like poor trafficking, limited penetration, and insufficient persistence within the tumor microenvironment (TME). CAR-T cells are engineered to express receptors that target specific cancer antigens, enhancing their ability to recognize and eliminate cancer cells. This review paper explores the intricate interplay between CAR-T therapy and radiotherapy (RT), investigating their synergistic potential. Radiotherapy, a standard cancer treatment, involves using high doses of radiation to target and damage cancer cells, disrupting their ability to grow and divide. We highlight that RT modulates the TME, augments antigen presentation, and promotes immune cell infiltration, bolstering CAR-T cell-mediated tumor eradication. Molecular insights shed light on RT-induced alterations in tumor stroma, T cell recruitment promotion, and induction of immunogenic cell death. Noteworthy, strategies, such as combining hypofractionated radiotherapy with myeloid-derived suppressor cell blockade, underscore innovative approaches to enhance CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumors. Bridging indications for RT and CAR-T cells in hematological malignancies are discussed, emphasizing scenarios where RT strategically enhances CAR-T cell efficacy. The paper critically evaluates the RT as a bridge compared to traditional chemotherapy, highlighting timing and dosage considerations crucial for optimizing CAR-T therapy outcomes. In summary, the paper provides valuable insights into the intricate molecular mechanisms activated by RT and innovative strategies to improve CAR-T cell therapy, fostering a deeper understanding of their combined potential in cancer treatment.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy, Adoptive , Neoplasms , Tumor Microenvironment , Humans , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/pathology , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Animals , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/immunology , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/metabolism , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Radiotherapy/methods
14.
Free Radic Biol Med ; 219: 88-103, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631648

ABSTRACT

This review explores the convergence of clinical radiotherapy and space radiation therapeutics, focusing on ionizing radiation (IR)-generated reactive oxygen species (ROS). IR, with high-energy particles, induces precise cellular damage, particularly in cancer treatments. The paper discusses parallels between clinical and space IR, highlighting unique characteristics of high-charge and energy particles in space and potential health risks for astronauts. Emphasizing the parallel occurrence of ROS generation in both clinical and space contexts, the review identifies ROS as a crucial factor with dual roles in cellular responses and potential disease initiation. The analysis covers ROS generation mechanisms, variations, and similarities in terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments leading to innovative ROS-responsive delivery systems adaptable for both clinical and space applications. The paper concludes by discussing applications of personalized ROS-triggered therapeutic approaches and discussing the challenges and prospects of implementing these strategies in clinical radiotherapy and extraterrestrial missions. Overall, it underscores the potential of ROS-targeted delivery for advancing therapeutic strategies in terrestrial clinical settings and space exploration, contributing to human health improvement on Earth and beyond.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Reactive Oxygen Species , Space Flight , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Humans , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoplasms/metabolism , Radiotherapy/methods , Cosmic Radiation , Radiation, Ionizing , Animals , Astronauts
15.
Acta otorrinolaringol. esp ; 75(2): 108-128, Mar-Abr. 2024. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-231383

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El schwannoma vestibular (SV) es el tumor más frecuente del ángulo pontocerebeloso. La mayor accesibilidad a las pruebas radiológicas ha incrementado su diagnóstico. Teniendo en cuenta las características del tumor, la clínica y la edad del paciente se han propuesto tres estrategias terapéuticas, observación, cirugía o radioterapia. La elección de la más adecuada para cada paciente es un motivo de controversia frecuente. Material y métodos: El presente trabajo incluye una revisión exhaustiva sobre cuestiones relativas al SV que pueden servir de guía clínica en el manejo de pacientes con estas lesiones. La presentación se ha orientado en forma de preguntas que el clínico se hace habitualmente y las respuestas están redactadas y/o revisadas por un panel de expertos nacionales e internacionales consultados por la Comisión de Otología de la SEORL-CCC. Resultados: Se ha elaborado un listado con los 13 bloques temáticos más controvertidos sobre el manejo del SV en forma de 50 preguntas y se han buscado las respuestas a todas ellas mediante una revisión sistemática de la literatura (artículos publicados en PubMed y Cochrane Library entre 1992 y 2023 sobre cada bloque temático). Treinta y tres expertos, liderados por la Comisión de Otología de la SEORL-CCC, han analizado y discutido todas las respuestas. En el Anexo 1 pueden encontrarse 14 preguntas adicionales divididas en cuatro bloques temáticos. Conclusiones: Esta guía de práctica clínica sobre el manejo del SV ofrece respuestas consensuadas a las preguntas más habituales que se plantean sobre este tumor. La ausencia de suficientes estudios prospectivos hace que los niveles de evidencia sobre el tema sean en general medios o bajos. Este hecho incrementa el interés de este tipo de guías de práctica clínica elaboradas por expertos.(AU)


IntroductionVestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common tumour of the cerebellopontine angle. The greater accessibility to radiological tests has increased its diagnosis. Taking into account the characteristics of the tumour, the symptoms and the age of the patient, three therapeutic strategies have been proposed: observation, surgery or radiotherapy. Choosing the most appropriate for each patient is a frequent source of controversy. Material and methods: This paper includes an exhaustive literature review of issues related to VS that can serve as a clinical guide in the management of patients with these lesions. The presentation has been oriented in the form of questions that the clinician usually asks himself and the answers have been written and/or reviewed by a panel of national and international experts consulted by the Otology Commission of the SEORL-CCC. Results: A list has been compiled containing the 13 most controversial thematic blocks on the management of VS in the form of 50 questions, and answers to all of them have been sought through a systematic literature review (articles published on PubMed and Cochrane Library between 1992 and 2023 related to each thematic area). Thirty-three experts, led by the Otology Committee of SEORL-CCC, have analyzed and discussed all the answers. In Annex 1, 14 additional questions divided into 4 thematic areas can be found. Conclusions: This clinical practice guideline on the management of VS offers agreed answers to the most common questions that are asked about this tumour. The absence of sufficient prospective studies means that the levels of evidence on the subject are generally medium or low. This fact increases the interest of this type of clinical practice guidelines prepared by experts.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Neuroma, Acoustic/diagnostic imaging , Cerebellopontine Angle/diagnostic imaging , Neurofibromatosis 2 , Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular , Hearing Loss , Tinnitus , Otolaryngology , Radiotherapy , Microsurgery
17.
Clin Cancer Res ; 30(10): 2078-2084, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38441659

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: No effective treatment exists for radiation-induced xerostomia. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (ASC) injection, relative to placebo, on salivary gland function in patients with radiation-induced xerostomia. PATIENT AND METHODS: In this single-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with hyposalivation were randomised to receive ultrasound-guided injections of allogeneic ASCs or placebo into the submandibular glands. Patients were followed for 4 months. We evaluated unstimulated whole salivary flow rate (UWS), stimulated salivary flow rate, and patient-reported outcomes. Adverse events were recorded and immune response determined in blood samples. RESULTS: We enrolled 120 patients. ASC treatment resulted in a statistically significant UWS increase of 0.04 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.06] mL/min (38%) compared with pretreatment baseline whereas placebo treatment did not cause a significant increase [0.01 (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.04) mL/min (21%)]. Both the ASC and placebo treatment yielded notable symptom reductions, with dry mouth decreasing by 13.6 and 7.7 units, sticky saliva decreased by 14.8 and 9.3 units, swallowing difficulties decreased by 7.9 and 8.0 units, and the summary score of the Xerostomia Questionnaire decreased 5.9 and 5.1 units for the ASC and placebo arms, respectively. We found no statistically significant group difference between the ASC and placebo arms for any of the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We could not confirm superiority of the ASC relative to placebo. ASC therapy significantly improved UWS in previous patients with head and neck cancer, whereas placebo resulted in an insignificant increase.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Xerostomia , Humans , Xerostomia/etiology , Xerostomia/therapy , Male , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/cytology , Radiation Injuries/therapy , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Double-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Salivary Glands/radiation effects , Radiotherapy/adverse effects
19.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 68(3): 342-352, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38450863

ABSTRACT

Advanced practitioners are healthcare professionals that are highly skilled with a particular area of expertise. These roles have been successfully implemented in many healthcare settings, improving efficiency of the service, as well as enhancing the standard of care received by patients. Although advanced practice roles have been implemented in some radiation therapy departments, their implementation have yet to be facilitated in the majority of countries. The purpose of this review is to scope the literature available regarding established advanced practice roles in radiation therapy. The PRISMA strategy for the identification of relevant literature was adhered to. Two data bases, EMBASE and PubMed, were searched using combinations of the key words 'Advanced', 'Practice', 'APRT', 'Radiation', 'Therapy' and 'Radiotherapy'. Exclusion criteria were applied, and citation lists were also screened for additional relevant sources, including grey literature sources. A total of 35 relevant sources were identified that discussed advanced practice radiation therapy roles in the United Kingdom, Singapore, Canada, Australia and the USA. Means of role establishment and scope of practice were defined, and a number of advantages and challenges for advanced practice radiation therapist roles were identified. There are many benefits of implementing advanced practice roles in radiation therapy departments. Though the implementation of these roles can be challenging, the existing evidence indicates that it would be beneficial for the patient, the radiation therapist and the department as a whole. A more systematic approach, including reporting of quantitative outcomes may assist in the more widespread implementation of these roles.


Subject(s)
Radiotherapy , Humans , Radiation Oncology
20.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 165, 2024 Mar 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492111

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Treatment intensification of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) plays a crucial role in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: We performed a critical narrative review of the relevant literature and present new developments in evidence-based treatment intensification strategies. RESULTS: For men with high-risk prostate cancer, there is strong evidence to support prolonging androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to 18-36 months and escalating the dose to the prostate using a brachytherapy boost. A potentially less toxic alternative to a brachytherapy boost is delivering a focal boost to dominant intraprostatic lesions using EBRT. In patients who meet STAMPEDE high-risk criteria, there is evidence to support adding a second-generation anti-androgen agent, such as abiraterone acetate, to long-term ADT. Elective pelvic lymph node irradiation may be beneficial in select patients, though more prospective data is needed to elucidate the group of patients who may benefit the most. Tumor genomic classifier (GC) testing and advanced molecular imaging will likely play a role in improving patient selection for treatment intensification as well as contribute to the evolution of treatment intensification strategies for future patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment intensification using a combination of EBRT, advanced hormonal therapies, and brachytherapy may improve patient outcomes and survival in men with high-risk prostate cancer. Shared decision-making between patients and multidisciplinary teams of radiation oncologists, urologists, and medical oncologists is essential for personalizing care in this setting and deciding which strategies make sense for individual patients.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Brachytherapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy , Radiotherapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...