ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine in the long term whether supervised physiotherapy is more effective than a home exercise program for functional improvement and pain relief in patients with distal radius fracture (DRF). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 74 patients older than 60 years with extra-articular DRF were randomly allocated into two groups. INTERVENTIONS: The experimental group received 6 weeks of supervised physiotherapy (nâ¯=â¯37) and the control group received 6 weeks of home exercise program (nâ¯=â¯37). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was wrist/hand function assessed using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire; secondary outcomes were the pain visual analogue scale (VAS), grip strength and wrist flexion-extension active range of motion. RESULTS: All patients completed the trial. For the primary outcome, at 6-weeks and 1-year follow-up, the PRWE questionnaire showed a mean difference between groups of 18.6 (95% CI 12.8 to 24.3) and 18.5 points (95% CI 12.7 to 24.2) respectively, these differences are clinically important. Conversely, at 2-year follow-up this effect decreases to 3.3 points (95% CI -2.4 to 9.0). For secondary outcomes, at 6-weeks and 1-year follow-up, in all measurements the effect size range from medium to large. Conversely, at 2-year follow-up only grip strength showed large effect size in favor of supervised physiotherapy, the rest of outcomes did not show difference between groups. CONCLUSION: At the 6-week and 1-year follow-up, supervised physiotherapy was more effective for functional improvement and pain relief compared with a home exercise program in patients older than 60 years with extra-articular DRF. However, this effect decreases over time, at the 2-year follow-up, only grip strength showed a difference in favor of supervised physiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian registry of clinical trials UTN no. U1111- 1249-2492. Registered 17 March 2020. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.
Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Hand Strength , Physical Therapy Modalities , Radius Fractures , Range of Motion, Articular , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy/methods , Middle Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Pain Measurement , Home Care Services , Wrist FracturesABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Identifying the outcomes of occupational therapy after a distal radius fracture (DRF) is important so that effective strategies can be developed to mitigate the consequences associated with this common fracture. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether participation in occupational therapy improved functional status. Secondary objectives were to assess its effects on body functions and to examine the association between changes in outcome measures and occupational therapy-related factors. DESIGN: Longitudinal, with consecutive sampling over a 12-mo period. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation service. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 38 adults with a unilateral DRF (ages 31-75 yr.; 81.6% female). INTERVENTION: Multicomponent occupational therapy, including supplemental techniques and activity-based interventions. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Functional status and body functions were assessed before and after therapy. RESULTS: All standardized measures of functional status showed significant improvements, which were large in size. Several body functions improved significantly (pain, sleep, wrist and forearm movements, and grip strength fraction), and effect sizes ranged from medium to large. For several outcome variables, earlier therapy was significantly associated with better results; moreover, the likelihood of achieving better outcomes was significantly higher among participants who attended more sessions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Occupational therapy services have an important role to play after a DRF in terms of returning to daily activities and reducing impairments in body functions. Earlier intervention and attending a higher number of occupational therapy sessions are likely to further improve these outcomes. What This Article Adds: Because the effects of occupational therapy among people with a DRF remain uncertain, we quantified the outcomes of this intervention in an outpatient rehabilitation service, revealing medium to large improvements in the performance of daily activities and in various body functions. Our findings identified two factors associated with better results: early initiation of therapy and a higher number of occupational therapy sessions.
Subject(s)
Occupational Therapy , Radius Fractures , Wrist Fractures , Adult , Humans , Female , Male , Longitudinal Studies , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , MovementABSTRACT
AIMS: Following cast removal for nonoperatively treated distal radius fractures, rehabilitation facilitated by advice leaflet and advice video were compared to a course of face-to-face therapy. METHODS: Adults with an isolated, nonoperatively treated distal radius fracture were included at six weeks post-cast removal. Participants were randomized to delivery of rehabilitation interventions in one of three ways: an advice leaflet; an advice video; or face-to-face therapy session(s). The primary outcome measure was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at six weeks post intervention and secondary outcome measures included DASH at one year, DASH work subscale, grip strength, and range of motion at six weeks and one year. RESULTS: A total of 116 (97%) of 120 enrolled participants commenced treatment. Of those, 21 were lost to follow-up, resulting in 30 participants in the advice leaflet, 32 in the advice video, and 33 face-to-face therapy arms, respectively at six weeks of follow-up. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in the DASH at six weeks (advice leaflet vs face-to-face therapy, p = 0.69; advice video vs face-to-face therapy, p = 0.56; advice leaflet vs advice video, p = 0.37; advice leaflet vs advice video vs face-to-face therapy, p = 0.63). At six weeks, there were no differences in any secondary outcome measures except for the DASH work subscale, where face-to-face therapy conferred benefit over advice leaflet (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Following cast removal for nonoperatively treated distal radius fractures, offering an advice leaflet or advice video for rehabilitation gives equivalent patient-reported outcomes to a course of face-to-face therapy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1033-1039.
Subject(s)
Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Adult , Aged , Casts, Surgical , Disability Evaluation , Female , Hand Strength , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Range of Motion, Articular , Video RecordingABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Limitation of wrist range of motion (ROM) is a common complication of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in geriatric patients. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation in the restoration of wrist ROM after geriatric DRF. Eighty-eight geriatric patients with DRF, 59 women and 29 men aged 71.69â±â6.232 years participated in the study. The time from wrist immobilization to rehabilitation was 12.89â±â5.318 weeks. Daily rehabilitation was performed 30âminutes a day for 8 weeks. Active wrist ROM was measured before and at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after rehabilitation. Data were analyzed by the repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), one-way MANOVA, and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Repeated measures MANOVA suggested a significant time effect for ROM (Wilks Lambdaâ=â0.002, Fâ=â7500.795, Pâ<â.001). Compared with before rehabilitation, each wrist ROM was significantly improved at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after rehabilitation. The one-way MANOVA demonstrated that changes in ROM were significantly different between groups (Wilks Lambdaâ=â0.007, Fâ=â559.525, partial eta squareâ=â0.993, Pâ<â.001), indicating that patients in the short-term stiffness group (≤3 months) had a significantly greater increase in ROM than patients in the long-term stiffness group (>3 months). The results of this study suggest an 8-week daily rehabilitation program for geriatric patients with limited ROM <3 months after DRF.
Subject(s)
Muscle Stretching Exercises , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Wrist Injuries/rehabilitation , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Range of Motion, Articular , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Many standardized outcome measures exist to measure recovery after surgical fixation of distal radius fractures, however, choosing the optimal instrument is difficult. We evaluated responsiveness, ceiling/floor effects, and criterion validity over multiple time intervals across a 2-year follow-up period for six commonly used instruments. METHODS: A total of 259 patients who received open reduction and internal fixation for distal radius fractures between 2012 and 2015 were recruited. Patients were administered the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), Green and O'Brien score (Cooney modification) (CGNO), Gartland and Werley score (Sarmiento modification) (SGNW), flexion-extension arc (FEArc), and grip fraction test (GripFrac) at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Responsiveness was evaluated by calculating standardized response means (SRM) and Cohen's d effect sizes (ES), and by correlating each instrument's change scores against those of QuickDASH and PRWE, which were also used as external comparators to assess criterion validity. Ceiling/floor effects were calculated for all measures at each time point. RESULTS: SRM (1.5-24 months) were 1.81, 1.77, 1.43, 1.16, 2.23, 2.45 and ES (1.5-24 months) were 1.81, 1.82, 1.95, 1.31, 1.99 and 2.90 for QuickDASH, PRWE, CGNO, SGNW, FEArc, and GripFrac respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients against QuickDASH at 24 months were: 0.809, 0.248, 0.563, 0.285, and 0.318 for PRWE, CGNO, SGNW, FEArc, and GripFrac respectively. Significant (>15% of patients reaching maximum score) ceiling effects were observed before 6 months for PRWE and SGNW. CONCLUSIONS: Our evidence supports the use of QuickDASH, PRWE, FEArc and GripFrac up to 6 months postsurgery, and QuickDASH and PRWE after 6 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Subject(s)
Radius Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Fixation, Internal/rehabilitation , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Open Fracture Reduction/rehabilitation , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Greenstick fractures most commonly occur in the pediatric population, especially in those under 10 years of age. Greenstick fractures are "extremely" rare in adults. This report presents the case of a greenstick fracture of the ulnar shaft in an adult following physical therapy for a radial neck fracture and ulnar shaft fracture post-internal fixation. Greenstick fracture can occur during physical therapy near the drill holes created during surgery. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 23-year-old man without any past medical history had sustained a greenstick fracture of the ulnar shaft after rehabilitation for a left radial and ulnar fracture that had been previously treated with internal fixation. DIAGNOSES: Five months after removal of the implants, the patient complained of left elbow tenderness and a "breaking" sound that occurred during physical therapy. The results of a subsequent X-ray revealed a greenstick fracture of the left ulnar shaft. INTERVENTIONS: Splinting of the fracture. OUTCOMES: After 2 months of splint fixation, the pain and range of motion in the affected arm were improved, and sequential X-rays showed callus formation and increased density of the ulnar shaft. LESSONS: Greenstick fractures occur not only in children but also in adults in specific circumstances. The cortex of long bones may be further weakened by drill holes created during surgery, and fractures may occur during physical therapy. During treatment, physicians, and therapists should pay more attention to the patient who has undergone implant removal to avoid greenstick fractures, especially in the locations near drill holes.
Subject(s)
Physical Therapy Modalities/adverse effects , Ulna Fractures/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Radius Fractures/surgery , Range of Motion, Articular , Splints , Ulna Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Ulna Fractures/etiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The identification of existing rehabilitation interventions and related evidence represents a crucial step along the development of the World Health Organization's (WHO) Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation (PIR). The methods for such identification have been developed by the WHO Rehabilitation Programme and Cochrane Rehabilitation under the guidance of the WHO's Guideline Review Committee secretariat. The aim of this paper is to report on the results of the systematic search for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) relevant to the rehabilitation of adults with fractures and to present the current state of evidence available from the identified CPGs. METHODS: This paper is part of the Best Evidence for Rehabilitation (be4rehab) series, developed according to the methodology presented in the World Health Organization's (WHO) Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation (PIR) introductory paper. It is a systematic review of existing CPGs on fractures in adult population published from 2009 to 2019. RESULTS: We identified 23 relevant CPGs after title and abstract screening. According to inclusion/exclusion criteria, we selected 13 CPGs. After checking for quality, publication time, multiprofessionality, and comprehensiveness, we finally included five CPGs dealing with rehabilitative management of fractures in adult population, two CPGs addressing treatment of distal radius fracture and three the treatment of femoral/hip fracture. CONCLUSION: The selected CPGs on management of distal radius and femoral/hip fracture include few recommendations regarding rehabilitation, with overall low to very low quality of evidence and weak/conditional strength of recommendation. Moreover, several gaps in specific rehabilitative topics occur. Further high-quality trials are required to upgrade the quality of the available evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1.
Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures/rehabilitation , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Adult , Femoral Fractures/therapy , Hip Fractures/rehabilitation , Hip Fractures/therapy , Humans , Radius Fractures/therapy , Recovery of Function , World Health OrganizationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To systematically analyze the existing intelligent rehabilitation mobile applications (APPs) related to distal radius fracture (DRF) and evaluate their features and characteristics, so as to help doctors and patients to make evidence-based choice for appropriate intelligent-assisted rehabilitation. METHODS: Literatures which in regard to the intelligent rehabilitation tools of DRF were systematic retrieved from the PubMed, the Cochrane library, Wan Fang, and VIP Data. The effective APPs were systematically screened out through the APP markets of iOS and Android mobile platform, and the functional characteristics of different APPs were evaluated and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 8 literatures and 31 APPs were included, which were divided into four categories: intelligent intervention, angle measurement, intelligent monitoring, and auxiliary rehabilitation games. These APPs provide support for the patients' home rehabilitation guidance and training and make up for the high cost and space limitations of traditional rehabilitation methods. The intelligent intervention category has the largest download ratio in the APP market. Angle measurement tools help DRF patients to measure the joint angle autonomously to judge the degree of rehabilitation, which is the most concentrated type of literature research. Some of the APPs and tools have obtained good clinical verification. However, due to the restrictions of cost, geographic authority, and applicable population, a large number of APPs still lack effective evidence to support popularization. CONCLUSION: Patients with DRF could draw support from different kinds of APPs in order to fulfill personal need and promote self-management. Intelligent rehabilitation APPs play a positive role in the rehabilitation of patients, but the acceptance of the utilization for intelligent rehabilitation APPs is relatively low, which might need follow-up research to address the conundrum.
Subject(s)
Mobile Applications , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Telerehabilitation/methods , Artificial Intelligence , Computational Biology , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Mathematical Concepts , Self Care/methods , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Telemedicine/methods , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Telerehabilitation/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: After the surgical management of distal radius fractures (DRF) in older patients, further treatment with a splint often follows. It is unclear whether early mobilization might be superior to splinting in this group of patients, as it is in others. In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we attempted to determine whether early mobilization yields better outcomes. METHODS: 50 patients over age 70 with DRF were included in the trial. Group A (the splint group) was treated with postoperative immobilization, group B with early mobilization. Clinical follow-up examinations were performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks and at 6 and 12 months. X-rays were obtained preoperatively, postoperatively, at 6 weeks, and at 6 months. The primary outcome parameter was the modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS) at 6 weeks. RESULTS: At 6 weeks, the functional outcome was better to a statistically significant extent in group B (MMWS; 65/100 vs. 55/100 [q25 : 55/40 - q75 : 70/70; p = 0.025]). No difference between the two groups was demonstrable in their further clinical course. The estimated regression model revealed a statistically significant effect of the method of treatment (p = 0.023). There were no differences in hand strength or in x-ray findings. DISCUSION: Early mobilization is associated with better wrist function on initial follow-up, without any demonstrable disadvantage with respect to secondary dislocation. The psychological benefit and protective function of wrist splinting in patients who are in danger of falling should nonetheless be investigated in further studies.
Subject(s)
Early Ambulation , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Splints , Aged , Humans , Prospective Studies , Radius Fractures/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Fractures of the radial neck accounts for 1% of all childhood fractures and 5% to 10% of childhood traumatic lesions involving the elbow. Intramedullary percutaneous nail reduction (Metaizeau technique) is considered the most effective surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to identify the main clinical features of radial neck fracture in children and to evaluate the anatomical and functional results of the Metaizeau technique. In this retrospective study, we evaluated 22 patients under the age of 16 who were treated for radial neck fracture at the orthopedic and trauma surgery department of Sahloul University Hospital in Sousse over a period of 16 years from January 2001 to April 2017. Authors used Metaizeau classification. Functional results were evaluated by Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and the radiological evaluation was based on standard images with measurement of the residual rocker. The average age was 8.6 years (5-13 years). Seven fracture were grade III injuries and three grade IV. In the immediate postoperative period, radiological measurements showed a residual rocker less than 20° in 86.3% and more than 20° in 13.7% of cases. At an average follow-up of 13 months and a half, the MEPS score was excellent and good for 17 patients. Four types of complications were found: necrosis of the radial head in 1 case, pseudarthrosis in 1 case, periarticular calcification in 2 cases and stiff-ness of the elbow in 3 cases. Despite the small number of patients in our series, we believe that the elastic stable intramedullary pinning according to the Metaizeau technique is the treatment of choice for displaced radial neck fractures in children.
Subject(s)
Bone Nails , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Radius Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Bone Nails/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Elbow/physiopathology , Elbow/surgery , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Elbow Joint/surgery , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fracture Fixation, Internal/rehabilitation , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/instrumentation , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/rehabilitation , Humans , Male , Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Postoperative Period , Radiography , Radius/diagnostic imaging , Radius/injuries , Radius/physiopathology , Radius/surgery , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Radius Fractures/epidemiology , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Range of Motion, Articular , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Tunisia/epidemiology , Elbow InjuriesABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to know if applying continuous passive motion (CPM) in addition to routine exercises is more effective than routine exercises alone in pain reduction, range of motion (ROM) and function improvement after distal radius fractures (DRFs). In this randomized controlled trial, 21 patients with non-stabilized DRF after pin removal were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group received stretching exercises with CPM machine for 2×15min per session. Both groups received routine exercises for 1h, three times a week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was pain evaluated on a visual analog scale (VAS), and the secondary outcome measures were disability evaluated by the patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation and ROM (goniometry) at 4, 6, and 12 weeks. Univariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and a one-way repeated measure mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for data analysis. Twenty-one participants completed the 12-week follow-up. Pain relief, ROM and functional improvement revealed that the treatment was successful in both groups. We detected no significant differences (p>0.05) between the two groups at the end of the follow-up period regarding pain, ROM, and function. Using a CPM machine had no additional effect on pain reduction, ROM and function improvement compared with routine exercises in patients with DRF.
Subject(s)
Motion Therapy, Continuous Passive , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Adult , Casts, Surgical , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Male , Postoperative Care , Radius Fractures/surgery , Range of Motion, Articular , Visual Analog ScaleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Distal radius fractures in the older population significantly impair grip strength. The aim of the study was to investigate whether a hand strength focused exercise program during the period of immobilization for nonoperatively managed distal radius fractures in this population improved grip strength and quality of life. DESIGN: This is a single-center randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis. Fifty-two patients older than 60 yrs who experienced distal radius fractures managed nonoperatively with cast immobilization. The intervention group (n = 26) received a home hand strength-focused exercise program from 2 and 6 wks after injury while immobilized in a full short arm cast. The control group (n = 26) performed finger range of motion exercises as per protocol. Primary outcome was grip strength ratio of injured arm compared with uninjured arm. Secondary outcome included functional scores of the 11-item shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand. Outcomes were measured at 2, 6, and 12 wks after injury. RESULTS: The intervention group significantly improved grip strength ratio at both 6 and 12 wks (6 wks: 40% vs 25%, P = 0.0044, and 12 wks: 81% vs 51%, P = 0.0035). The intervention group improved the 11-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score at 12 wks; however, this was not statistically significant (25 vs 40, P = 0.066). CONCLUSIONS: A hand strength-focused exercise program for elderly patients with distal radius fractures while immobilized significantly improved grip strength.
Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/methods , Fracture Fixation/rehabilitation , Hand Strength , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Wrist Injuries/rehabilitation , Aged , Casts, Surgical , Female , Humans , Intention to Treat Analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Radius Fractures/physiopathology , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Wrist Injuries/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Although the literature generally agrees that displaced distal radius fractures require surgery, no single consensus exists concerning the length of immobilization and type of post-operative physiotherapeutic rehabilitation program. Palmar locking plate fixation represents a very stable fixation of the distal radius, and was assessed biomechanically in various studies. Surprisingly, most authors report additional immobilization after plate fixation. One reason might be due to the pain caused during active wrist mobilization in the early post-operative stages or secondly to protect the osteosynthesis in the early healing stages preventing secondary loss of reduction. This article addresses the biomechanical principles, current available evidence for early mobilization/immobilization and impact of physiotherapy after operatively treated distal radius fractures.
Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Internal/rehabilitation , Immobilization/methods , Physical Therapy Modalities , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Bone Plates , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Humans , Radius Fractures/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Wrist Joint/physiopathologyABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort single-center study. INTRODUCTION: Self-efficacy (SE) refers to beliefs in ones capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to produce given goals. High SE is an important factor for recovery from injury/illness; people who believe in their capability will more likely reach a good outcome. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to examine if SE has an effect to physical functioning, pain and patient-rated wrist function three months postoperatively in patients undergoing plating due to a distal radius fracture. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients undergoing plating for a distal radius fracture rated SE at the first appointment with the physiotherapist. At the three-month follow-up, the following assessments were administered: Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), pain-scores, hand grip strength, and range of motion. RESULTS: The group with a high SE showed significantly better range of motion for flexion (P = .046) and supination (P = .045), hand grip strength (P = .001) and PRWE scores (P = .04). The NRS pain during activity was lower, although not significantly lower (P = .09). Using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, there was a moderate correlation between SE and pain during activity, wrist flexion, and PRWE score. DISCUSSION: SE corresponds to wrist function after combined plating of distal radius fractures. CONCLUSION: Measurement of SE could possibly be useful to identify patients in special need of support during the postoperative rehabilitation.
Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Radius Fractures/psychology , Radius Fractures/surgery , Self Efficacy , Wrist Joint/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Female , Hand Strength , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Pronation , Prospective Studies , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Range of Motion, Articular , Recovery of Function , Supination , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
We sought to investigate the effects of early manual therapy on functional outcomes in patients treated with volar plating of a distal radius fracture (DRF). This was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients treated with volar plating of a DRF were randomly assigned to either Early Manual Therapy Group (EMTG, n=19) or Standard Physiotherapy Group (SPG, n=20). While SPG received standard physiotherapy, EMTG received standard physiotherapy plus Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement technique two sessions a week, through 12 weeks. Function, pain intensity, range of motion, grip strength and the level of disability were assessed using the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), goniometer, hand dynamometer and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire, respectively. Measurements were made at 3, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Of the 54-screened patients, 39 met the inclusion criteria and were randomized. In total, 32 patients (EMTG, n=15; SPG, n=17) were analyzed. EMTG had significantly better DASH score and wrist flexion at 12 weeks, less pain and better PRWE total score, wrist extension, ulnar/radial deviation, supination and grip strength at all time points. Moreover, wrist flexion increased more with the addition of early manual therapy than standard physiotherapy alone (26.50±13.19 versus 16.21±16.06). The addition of early manual therapy to standard physiotherapy may contribute to better functional outcomes and be more effective in increasing wrist flexion in patients treated with volar plating of a DRF.
Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Physical Therapy Modalities , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Radius Fractures/surgery , Disability Evaluation , Female , Hand Strength , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Range of Motion, Articular , Single-Blind Method , Visual Analog ScaleABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Case report. INTRODUCTION: A severe wrist fracture can cause permanent physical disabilities and deformities, leading to limit patients in their occupation and social environment. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: We aim at presenting a treatment protocol and the functional outcome of a patient with severe clinical state after a rare wrist fracture. METHODS: We provided physical therapy intervention associated with serious games for muscle strengthening. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: There was an increase in strengthening and a decrease in Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation scores. The International Classification of Functioning scores have changed from severe to light or to absent in many of the domains. CONCLUSION: The use of serious games combined with a conventional physical therapy intervention played a fundamental role in recovery and return to work activities, and there was also an important recovery of general health condition.
Subject(s)
Hand Strength/physiology , Physical Therapy Modalities , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Ulna Fractures/rehabilitation , Video Games , Wrist Joint/physiopathology , Adult , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Male , Radius Fractures/physiopathology , Radius Fractures/surgery , Ulna Fractures/physiopathology , Ulna Fractures/surgery , Wrist Joint/surgeryABSTRACT
A retrospective case series that included 253 free-ranging birds of prey admitted to a rehabilitation center was conducted to describe the treatment and outcome of antebrachial fractures. Medical records from birds of prey belonging to 21 species admitted with antebrachial fracture between 1989 and 2015 at the University of California, Davis, were reviewed. Species distribution on admission, treatment, outcome, and complications were described by fracture category and species. Among 134 birds treated after initial triage on the day of admission, 4 bone/ wing categories were identified: 83 birds had an ulnar fracture only; 18 birds had a radial fracture only; 28 birds had a concomitant fracture of the radius and ulna on the same wing; and 5 birds had bilateral antebrachial fractures. Logistic regressions were performed to determine which factors were associated with a positive outcome within each of these 4 categories. Among birds having only an ulnar fracture, those with a closed fracture were significantly more likely to be released than birds with open fractures (P = .03; odds ratio = 5.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.29-28.12). In addition, birds with a fracture of the middle third of the ulna were significantly more likely to be released than birds diagnosed with a single fracture of the proximal third of the ulna (P = .02; odds ratio = 4.54, 95% confidence interval: 1.35-16.64). No significant prognostic factor was detected in other fracture categories.
Subject(s)
Forelimb/injuries , Fractures, Bone/veterinary , Raptors/injuries , Animals , Euthanasia, Animal/statistics & numerical data , Fractures, Bone/complications , Fractures, Bone/rehabilitation , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Hospitals, Animal , Hospitals, Teaching , Logistic Models , Prognosis , Radius Fractures/mortality , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Radius Fractures/therapy , Radius Fractures/veterinary , Retrospective Studies , Ulna Fractures/mortality , Ulna Fractures/rehabilitation , Ulna Fractures/therapy , Ulna Fractures/veterinaryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hip fracture and upper extremity fracture are most important age-related fracture. However, there have been few reports about the analysis of prevalence or risk factors with concomitant hip and upper extremity fractures. This study aimed to describe the prevalence and clinical implications of the concomitant hip and upper extremity fractures in elderly. METHODS: We evaluate 1018 patients aged >65 years who were surgically treated for femoral neck or intertrochanteric fractures between March 2008 and December 2018. 35 patients (3.4%) with a hip fracture combined upper extremity fracture. All patients were classified into the isolated hip fracture and the concomitant fracture. We analyzed these patients' characteristics such as age, gender, bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index (BMI), Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K), injury mechanism, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The most common site of upper extremity fracture was distal radius fracture of 15 patients (42.8%), followed by proximal humeral fracture of 8 (22.8%). Concomitant fractures occurred on the same side in 30 patients (85.7%). The mean age of patients with a concomitant fracture was younger than that of patients with an isolated hip fracture (pâ¯<â¯0.05). Mean preinjury MMSE-K was 22.7 in isolated hip fracture and 25.6 in concomitant fracture patients (pâ¯<â¯0.05). Mean length of hospital stay was statistically significant different between two groups (pâ¯<â¯0.05). According to fracture site of hip, there was no statistically different prevalence of upper extremity fracture in femoral intertrochanteric fracture compared to the neck fracture. CONCLUSION: We found a 3.4% prevalence of concomitant hip and upper extremity fractures. It was found that the younger the age with preserved cognitive ability in elderly patients with a hip fracture, the higher the prevalence of upper extremity fracture. In addition, it is important to keep in mind that patients with a concomitant fracture have a longer hospital stay and difficulty in rehabilitation.
Subject(s)
Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Humeral Fractures/epidemiology , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Trauma/epidemiology , Radius Fractures/epidemiology , Recovery of Function/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density , Female , Hip Fractures/physiopathology , Hip Fractures/rehabilitation , Hip Fractures/surgery , Hospitalization , Humans , Humeral Fractures/physiopathology , Humeral Fractures/rehabilitation , Humeral Fractures/surgery , Male , Multiple Trauma/physiopathology , Multiple Trauma/rehabilitation , Multiple Trauma/surgery , Prevalence , Radius Fractures/physiopathology , Radius Fractures/rehabilitation , Radius Fractures/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Older patients are frequently referred to hand therapy after distal radius fracture. Supervised therapy sessions place a transportation burden on patients and are costly on both the individual and systematic levels. Furthermore, there is little evidence that supervised therapy or home exercises improve long-term outcomes. METHODS: Data were collected for the Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial, a multicenter, international, pragmatic, randomized trial of distal radius fracture treatment in patients aged 60 years and older. Referral to therapy and therapy protocol were at the discretion of the treating surgeon and therapist. The authors examined outcomes between participants who underwent therapy and those who did not and assessed the duration of therapy. The authors also analyzed the effect of therapy on subgroups at risk for poor outcomes: older participants and those who had more comorbidities or lower baseline activity. RESULTS: Eighty percent of participants underwent therapy; 70 percent participated in both supervised therapy and home exercises. Participants had a mean 9.2 supervised sessions over 14.2 weeks. There were no differences in patient-reported outcomes between participants who underwent therapy and those who did not. Participants who did not have therapy recovered more grip strength. Participants who engaged in therapy for a shorter time reported greater function, ability to work, and satisfaction. There were no relationships revealed in subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Hand therapy after distal radius fracture may not be necessary for older patients. Encouraging participants to resume activities of daily living as soon as possible may be as effective as formal therapy. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.