Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 370
Filter
1.
Ultraschall Med ; 45(3): 285-292, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38101445

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The progression of deep endometriosis (DE) in women of reproductive age is highly variable. This study aimed to analyze the sonomorphological changes of rectal endometriosis over long periods of time and the influence of hormonal treatment. METHODS: This retrospective study included premenopausal women with rectal DE treated conservatively between 2002 and 2021. The lesion length and thickness of the nodule were evaluated at regular intervals over time. We created statistical models with mixed effects to identify potential factors influencing lesion progression and regression. RESULTS: 38 patients were monitored over a mean period of 7.2 (± 4.2) years with a mean of 3.1 (± 2.1) check-ups within the observation period. We detected a significant increase in lesion length until the end of the fourth decade of life. In addition, we found a substantial decrease in the length and thickness of the nodule depending on the length of hormonal treatment. CONCLUSION: In conservatively managed patients with rectal endometriosis, without hormonal therapy, lesion size can exhibit a moderate increase up to the end of the fourth decade of life, after which it appears to stabilize. This increase does not follow a linear pattern. Hormonal therapy is crucial in impeding further progression, resulting in either a cessation or a regression of lesion growth.


Subject(s)
Disease Progression , Endometriosis , Rectal Diseases , Ultrasonography , Humans , Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Endometriosis/pathology , Endometriosis/drug therapy , Female , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Rectal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Diseases/pathology , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Age Factors , Middle Aged , Young Adult
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 16(1)2023 Jan 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36697111

ABSTRACT

A young adult man presented to an outlying emergency department with a sore throat, fever and chills. Upon failure of symptomatic management and a course of amoxicillin, he developed rectal pain and loose stools. Despite outpatient doxycycline treatment for presumed chlamydial proctitis, he developed worsening rectal pain and bloody stools. Results on abdominal and pelvic CT were consistent with proctitis. His symptoms worsened despite added metronidazole for bacterial proctitis. Workup revealed an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein and calprotectin, suggestive of a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A colonoscopy revealed proximal tightness of the rectum, and pathology reported features suggestive of IBD. He was treated with prednisone and mesalamine. However, immunostaining positive for cytomegalovirus (CMV) confirmed a diagnosis of tissue-invasive CMV proctitis. This was further supported by serological testing for CMV consistent with a diagnosis of CMV proctitis preceded by a primary CMV infection of the pharynx.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Proctitis , Rectal Diseases , Male , Young Adult , Humans , Cytomegalovirus , Rare Diseases , Proctitis/diagnosis , Proctitis/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/complications , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Rectal Diseases/diagnosis , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Pain
3.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 35(1): 42-48, 2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34840272

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rectal chlamydia is a prevalent sexually transmissible infection in both men who have sex with men (MSM) and in women. Screening is recommended for MSM but remains controversial for women. The optimal treatment for rectal chlamydia is now conclusive but interpreting and managing positive results remains challenging. Infections among MSM are increasing and strategies are needed to reduce incident infections. This review summarizes recent developments for the screening and management of rectal chlamydia and its implications on reinfection. RECENT FINDINGS: Reinfections in MSM may be occurring due to resumption of sex soon after treatment whereas repeat infections in women may occur due to autoinoculation in the absence of sex. Doxycycline is now first-line treatment but its role in chemoprophylaxis remains unclear. False positive results remain an issue, but the development of viability assays may prove useful in future to determine true infections. SUMMARY: Doxycycline is the first-line treatment for rectal chlamydia and in women may prevent infections at the urogenital site. Viability assays can help to reduce antibiotic use once developed. The role of routine screening of rectal chlamydia in women remains unclear and this debate may soon include asymptomatic infections in MSM.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections , Gonorrhea , Rectal Diseases , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia Infections/drug therapy , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia trachomatis , Female , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Prevalence , Rectal Diseases/diagnosis , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Rectal Diseases/epidemiology , Reinfection
5.
N Engl J Med ; 384(25): 2418-2427, 2021 06 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34161706

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rectal chlamydia is a common bacterial sexually transmissible infection among men who have sex with men. Data from randomized, controlled trials are needed to guide treatment. METHODS: In this double-blind trial conducted at five sexual health clinics in Australia, we randomly assigned men who have sex with men and who had asymptomatic rectal chlamydia to receive doxycycline (100 mg twice daily for 7 days) or azithromycin (1-g single dose). Asymptomatic chlamydia was selected as the trial focus because more than 85% of men with rectal chlamydia infection are asymptomatic, and clinical guidelines recommend a longer treatment course for symptomatic infection. The primary outcome was a negative nucleic acid amplification test for rectal chlamydia (microbiologic cure) at 4 weeks. RESULTS: From August 2016 through August 2019, we enrolled 625 men (314 in the doxycycline group and 311 in the azithromycin group). Primary outcome data were available for 290 men (92.4%) in the doxycycline group and 297 (95.5%) in the azithromycin group. In the modified intention-to-treat population, a microbiologic cure occurred in 281 of 290 men (96.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 94.9 to 98.9) in the doxycycline group and in 227 of 297 (76.4%; 95% CI, 73.8 to 79.1) in the azithromycin group, for an adjusted risk difference of 19.9 percentage points (95% CI, 14.6 to 25.3; P<0.001). Adverse events that included nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting were reported in 98 men (33.8%) in the doxycycline group and in 134 (45.1%) in the azithromycin group (risk difference, -11.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -19.5 to -3.2). CONCLUSIONS: A 7-day course of doxycycline was superior to single-dose azithromycin in the treatment of rectal chlamydia infection among men who have sex with men. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council; RTS Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12614001125617.).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Chlamydia Infections/drug therapy , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Doxycycline/therapeutic use , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Asymptomatic Infections , Australia , Azithromycin/administration & dosage , Azithromycin/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Doxycycline/administration & dosage , Doxycycline/adverse effects , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Intention to Treat Analysis , Male , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Rectal Diseases/microbiology , Rectum/microbiology
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32680785

ABSTRACT

Endometriosis infiltrating the bowel can be treated medically in accurately selected women not seeking conception and without overt obstructive symptomatology. When the rectosigmoid junction is involved, the probabilities of intestinal symptoms relief, undergoing surgery after treatment failure, and developing bowel obstruction during hormonal treatment are around 70%, 10%, and 1-2%, respectively. When the lesion infiltrates exclusively the mid-rectum, thus in cases of true rectovaginal endometriosis, the probabilities of intestinal symptoms relief and undergoing surgery are about 80% and 3%, respectively. Endometriotic obstructions of the rectal ampulla have not been reported. A rectosigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy should be performed systematically before starting medical therapies, also to rule out malignant tumours arising from the intestinal mucosa. Progestogens are safe, generally effective, well-tolerated, inexpensive, and should be considered as first-line medications for bowel endometriosis. Independently of symptom relief, intestinal lesions should be checked periodically to exclude nodule progression during hormonal treatment.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Laparoscopy , Rectal Diseases , Colon, Sigmoid , Endometriosis/diagnosis , Endometriosis/drug therapy , Endometriosis/surgery , Female , Humans , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Rectum
8.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 19(4): 487-493, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33034227

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Azithromycin was recommended as the first-line therapeutic regimen for treatment of genital infections in men and women by the Centers for Disease Control in 1998. A series of studies of azithromycin for treatment of rectal chlamydial infection in men who have sex with men (MSM) found that azithromycin was significantly less effective than doxycycline. AREAS COVERED: Literature on treatment of rectal C. trachomatis from 2000 through May 2020 was searched using PubMed. Retrospective and observational studies were identified documenting the frequency and treatment of rectal chlamydial infection in MSM, heterosexual men and women that reported lower efficacy of single-dose azithromycin compared to doxycycline. Literature on possible reasons for the lower efficacy were also reviewed including studies of antibiotic resistance, impact of organism load, and persistent infection in rectal specimens and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of azithromycin in rectal tissue. EXPERT OPINION: The available data suggests that single-dose azithromycin is not as effective as azithromycin for the treatment of rectal infection in MSM and women. Most of these data have been retrospective or from observational studies. Final recommendations will depend on the outcome of prospective, randomized, treatment studies. We may also need to examine other dosage regimens for azithromycin.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Azithromycin/administration & dosage , Chlamydia Infections/drug therapy , Chlamydia Infections/microbiology , Chlamydia trachomatis/drug effects , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Doxycycline/administration & dosage , Female , Genital Diseases, Female/drug therapy , Genital Diseases, Female/microbiology , Genital Diseases, Male/drug therapy , Genital Diseases, Male/microbiology , Humans , Male , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Rectal Diseases/microbiology , Sexual and Gender Minorities
9.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(47): e23309, 2020 Nov 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33217865

ABSTRACT

Laparoscopic anterior resection of rectum (AR) is one of surgical approaches for deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). Up to date, no clinical trials have clearly analyzed the short-term and long-term complications post-surgically, indications or feasibilities for surgical procedure, or post-operative recovery. The aims of this trial were to evaluate the indications for laparoscopic AR, the short-term and long-term complications post-surgically, post-operative recovery.We conducted a prospective study of 29 patients. They were divided into 2 groups. The period of follow-up was 12 months post-surgery. In our study, we recruited patents with laparoscopic AR experiencing failure of medical treatment (3 months) or associated infertility (>2cycles). The operative data and short term and long term complications were recorded. The outcomes of laparoscopic AR group were assessed by questionnaires, such as NRS (numeric rating scale), KESS (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott Symptom Questionnaire), VAS (visual analogue scale), WCS (Wexner constipation score) and ABS (Abdominal Bloating Score), which were compared with the outcomes of medicine group at set time points of baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months. The overall outcomes of the two groups were assessed with 5-point Likert Scale.Patients in surgery group were recovery rapidly without serious short term or long term complications. All of NRS, KESS, VAS, WCS, and ABS in surgery group were getting better greatly than that in medicine group (3.04 ±â€Š1.91 vs 5.41 ±â€Š3.01, 5.64 ±â€Š1.54 vs 7.01 ±â€Š1.03, 0.50 ±â€Š0.38 vs 3.58 ±â€Š2.01, 4.43 ±â€Š1.02 vs 8.92 ±â€Š2.45, and 0.61 ±â€Š0.34 vs 1.42 ±â€Š0.71) at 3 months post-operation. However, the advantage of surgery group was almost vanished at 12 months (4.02 ±â€Š2.53 vs 5.99 ±â€Š2.31, 7.42 ±â€Š3.17 vs 10.98 ±â€Š2.53, 1.59 ±â€Š1.3 vs 2.23 ±â€Š1.59, 6.01 ±â€Š2.53 vs 7.90 ±â€Š3.25, and 1.31 ±â€Š1.05 vs 1.39 ±â€Š1.02). Furthermore, we compared the overall outcomes between the 2 groups with 5-point Likert Scale, with confirmation of the advantage at 3 months post-surgically. Additionally, we compared these questionnaires, with the finding that VAS and 5-point Likert Scale of surgery group had the same changes. Finally, a table of indications for laparoscopic AR were tabulated according our clinical experience.Patients can receive benefit from both medicine and laparoscopic AR. However, laparoscopic AR has obvious advantage of rapid symptom relief. Further studies and clinical data collections are required for indications and feasibility of combined therapy.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis/drug therapy , Endometriosis/surgery , Laparoscopy , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Adult , Endometriosis/pathology , Female , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Rectal Diseases/pathology , Time Factors , Young Adult
10.
Rinsho Shinkeigaku ; 60(11): 752-757, 2020 Nov 27.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33115989

ABSTRACT

Surfer's myelopathy is non-traumatic spinal cord injury which develops in beginner surfers. The patient was a 17-year-old female who developed severe paraplegia with bilateral sensory dysfunction below the groin and bladder/rectal dysfunctions after her first surfing lesson. A spinal-cord MRI performed six hours after onset revealed an intramedullary hyperintensity area from T8 to the conus medullaris on the T2 weighted images. Expansion of this hyperintensity area was observed on Day 3 and showed a reduction on Day 8. After providing intravenous methylpredonisolone, intravenous glycerol and intravenous edaravone, motor function and bladder/rectal functions began to improve after approximately three weeks. In this study, the expansion of the lesion in the early stages of the disease course was observed by sequential spinal MRI. Furthermore, a time lag between improvement according to imaging and improvement in symptoms was also observed.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Diffusion Tensor Imaging/methods , Spinal Cord Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Water Sports , Adolescent , Athletic Injuries/complications , Athletic Injuries/drug therapy , Edaravone/administration & dosage , Female , Glycerol/administration & dosage , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , Paraplegia/drug therapy , Paraplegia/etiology , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Rectal Diseases/etiology , Spinal Cord Diseases , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/drug therapy , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Bladder Diseases/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Diseases/etiology
11.
Dig Liver Dis ; 52(8): 885-888, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32532605

ABSTRACT

There is no consensus on the treatment for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS). This study aimed to obtain information from physicians treating patients with SRUS in a French medical surgical society to facilitate management plans and to develop a support algorithm. Members of the French National Society of Coloproctology (SNFCP) were invited to complete a survey that included twenty items about therapeutic management and healing criteria. Overall, 91 practitioners (median age: 52 [42-59] years) responded to the questionnaire; 64/91 (70.3%) were proctologists, and 27/91 (29.7%) were colorectal surgeons. Only 15 members (16.5%) followed more than 5 patients with SRUS per year. The therapeutic objectives were to improve both patient symptoms (100%) and quality of life (98.9%). Laxative treatment and first-line rehabilitation were agreed upon by 83.5% and 73% of the respondents, respectively. Surgery, mainly rectopexy, was offered after failed medical treatment by 81.1% of the practitioners (79.1%). The first-line strategy preferred by the professionals included laxatives and biofeedback rehabilitation. Surgical treatment, preferably rectopexy, was proposed as a second intervention. No consensus was reached regarding other therapeutic alternatives, and additional studies are required to clarify their indications.


Subject(s)
Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Ulcer/drug therapy , Adult , Colorectal Surgery/methods , Female , France , Humans , Laxatives/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Quality of Life , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Surveys and Questionnaires , Syndrome , Ulcer/surgery
12.
Ann Pharmacother ; 54(10): 1030-1037, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32436729

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical efficacy data for gentamicin in the treatment of gonorrhea. DATA SOURCES: A keyword search of PubMed (1966 to April 2020), EMBASE (1947 to April 2020), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 to April 2020) was conducted. The electronic search was supplemented with manual screening of references from identified articles and a search of ClinicalTrials.gov to identify ongoing trials. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Comparator and noncomparator studies reporting microbiological outcomes of treatment with gentamicin for gonorrhea in humans were included. Data extracted included study year, authors, aim, setting, population, dosing protocols, and outcome results. Risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 407 articles were identified, of which 11 met inclusion criteria. Two studies were randomized controlled trials, and 1 additional randomized noncomparator study was identified. All other studies were nonrandomized and noncomparator in nature. The highest quality evidence suggests that gentamicin is not noninferior to ceftriaxone (both in addition to azithromycin) for treatment of gonorrhea but may achieve cure rates >90%. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the efficacy of gentamicin-based regimens for the specific treatment of extragenital gonorrhea. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Results of this review could affect patient care and clinical practice because they clearly demonstrate the role of gentamicin for the treatment of gonorrhea as a second-line agent. Future research should confirm findings, especially for the role of gentamicin in extragenital infections. CONCLUSIONS: Gentamicin-based regimens should be reserved for second-line treatment of urogenital and extragenital gonorrhea infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Gonorrhea/drug therapy , Pharyngitis/drug therapy , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Gentamicins/administration & dosage , Humans , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/drug effects , Pharyngitis/microbiology , Rectal Diseases/microbiology , Treatment Outcome
13.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 71(1): 29-33, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32097373

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is said to be rare in children (largest series so far; 55 in children, 116 in adults). We analyzed our experience to look at its clinical presentations, endoscopic appearance, and treatment outcome in a large cohort of children. METHODS: Clinical and endoscopic data were collected between 2000 and 2018. Children (18 years or younger) diagnosed to have SRUS on colonoscopy and confirmed by histopathology were included. All children with SRUS were treated with behavioral modification, bulk laxative. Most with ulcer received steroid enema and some sulfasalazine or sucralfate enema. RESULTS: The median age of 140 children was 12 (interquartile range [IQR]: 10-14) years, 79% were boys. The median symptom duration was 21 (IQR: 9-36) months. Rectal bleeding was the presenting feature in 131 (93.6%); constipation in 38 (27%); and small, frequent stools in 79 (56%). Most children had features of dyssynergic defecation such as prolonged sitting in the toilet (131, 93.6%), excessive straining (138, 98.6%), a feeling of incomplete evacuation (130, 92.8%), and rectal digitation (71, 50.7%). Rectal prolapse was noted in 24 (17%) cases. Colonoscopy documented rectal ulcer in 101 (72%) [Single: 84]. Over a median follow-up of 6 (IQR: 4-18) months, 27 patients were lost to follow-up and of the remaining 113 cases, 71 (62.8%) showed clinical improvement (healing of ulcer documented in 36/82, 44%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of cases of SRUS presented in second decade with rectal bleeding and features of dyssynergic defecation. Ulcer was noted in three fourths of cases. The outcome of medical treatment with behavioral modification and local therapy was modest.


Subject(s)
Rectal Diseases , Ulcer , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Colonoscopy , Female , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Humans , Male , Rectal Diseases/diagnosis , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Syndrome , Ulcer/diagnosis , Ulcer/drug therapy
14.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 36(6): 540-544, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711348

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing implant in treating patients with rectovaginal endometriosis. The study was based on the retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, including symptomatic women who had ultrasonographic diagnosis of rectovaginal endometriosis. Patients were follow-up at 6, 12 and 24 months from the insertion of the ENG-releasing implant. The intensity of pain symptoms was evaluated using a visual analog scale. The volume of the nodules was estimated by virtual organ computer-aided analysis. The Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP-30) was used to evaluate quality of life. Overall, 43 women were included in the study. The 2-year continuation rate for the ENG-releasing implant was 93.0%. The treatment quickly improved the intensity of non-menstrual pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and dyschezia. At 6-month follow-up, there were improvements in all domains of the EHP-30 compared with baseline. Further improvements in the EHP-30 results were observed only in pain sub score at 12-month follow-up and in emotional well-being sub score at 24-month follow-up. At 6-month follow-up the volume of the rectovaginal nodules was significantly lower compared with baseline; a further decrease was observed at 12- and 24-month follow-up. The treatment was well tolerated.


Subject(s)
Desogestrel/administration & dosage , Endometriosis/drug therapy , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Vaginal Diseases/drug therapy , Adult , Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Contraceptive Agents, Female/adverse effects , Contraceptive Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Contraceptive Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Desogestrel/adverse effects , Drug Implants , Dysmenorrhea/drug therapy , Dyspareunia/drug therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Italy , Pain Measurement , Pelvic Pain/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
16.
Einstein (Sao Paulo) ; 17(2): eAO4583, 2019 May 02.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31066795

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical features and complications in patients with bowel endometriosis submitted to hormonal therapy. METHODS: Retrospective study based on data extracted from medical records of 238 women with recto-sigmoid endometriosis treated between May 2010 and May 2016. RESULTS: Over the course of follow-up, 143 (60.1%) women remained in medical treatment while 95 (39.9%) presented with worsening of pain symptoms or intestinal lesion growth (failure of medical treatment group), with surgical resection performed in 54 cases. Women in the Medical Treatment Group were older (40.5±5.1 years versus 37.3±5.8 years; p<0.0001) and had smaller recto sigmoid lesions (2.1±1.9 versus 3.1±2.2; p=0.008) compared to those who had failed to respond to medical treatment. Similar significant reduction in pain scores for dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, cyclic dyschezia and dysuria was observed in both groups; however greater reduction in pain scores for dyspareunia was noted in the Surgical Group. Subjective improvement in pain symptoms was also similar between groups (100% versus 98.2%; p=0.18). Major complications rates were higher in the Surgical Group (9.2% versus 0.6%; p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with recto-sigmoid endometriosis who failed to respond to medical treatment were younger and had larger intestinal lesions. Hormonal therapy was equally efficient in improving pain symptoms other than dyspareunia compared to surgery, and was associated with lower complication rates in women with recto-sigmoid endometriosis. Medical treatment should be offered as a first-line therapy for patients with bowel endometriosis. Surgical treatment should be reserved for patients with pain symptoms unresponsive to hormonal therapy, lesion growth or suspected intestinal subocclusion.


Subject(s)
Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/therapeutic use , Endometriosis/drug therapy , Pelvic Pain/drug therapy , Progestins/therapeutic use , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Sigmoid Diseases/drug therapy , Adult , Chronic Pain , Dysmenorrhea/drug therapy , Dyspareunia/drug therapy , Endometriosis/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Medical Records , Pain Measurement , Pelvic Pain/surgery , Recombinant Fusion Proteins , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Sigmoid Diseases/surgery , Treatment Outcome
17.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 98(9): 1139-1147, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30970147

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Deep infiltrating endometriosis is a common cause of pelvic pain. However, some patients have limited problems that may be controlled by medical treatment, so avoiding the potentially severe complications of major surgery. This approach requires detailed knowledge on quality of life and clinical symptoms over time. The aim of the study was to monitor these parameters in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis treated with oral contraceptives, oral gestagens, and/or the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. Moreover, nodule size measurements performed with transvaginal sonography were correlated to severity of symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Conservatively treated patients on oral contraceptives, oral gestagens, or the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device underwent transvaginal sonography and answered a self-administered questionnaire regarding clinical symptoms and quality of life (Short Form 36 and Endometriosis Health Profile 30) at baseline, and 6 and 12 months later. RESULTS: Eighty women completed the follow up. Scores of quality of life were comparable to normative data for Danish women of similar age and did not change with time. No association between change in size of the rectosigmoid nodule and change in symptoms was seen. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports that simple treatment with oral contraceptives, oral gestagens, or the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device represents a viable therapeutic approach to rectosigmoid Deep infiltrating endometriosis, provided that proper selection of patients in need of surgery exists.


Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment , Contraceptives, Oral/therapeutic use , Endometriosis/drug therapy , Intrauterine Devices, Medicated , Levonorgestrel/therapeutic use , Progestins/therapeutic use , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Sigmoid Diseases/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adult , Denmark , Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Pelvic Pain/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Rectal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Sigmoid Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 21(12): 1707-1711, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30949931

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy-induced dysfunction of the gastrointestinal tract is common in cancer patients and has a significant impact on their quality of life. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) in patients undergoing 3D pelvic radiotherapy and who had proctalgia. METHODS: This observational, multicenter, cross-sectional epidemiological study was performed in 13 Spanish hospitals. Data were obtained on the presence and characteristics of BTcP, demographics, common comorbidities, and treatments prescribed to the patients. RESULTS: The prevalence of BTcP in patients undergoing pelvic 3D external radiotherapy with proctalgia (N = 105) was 48.6% (95% CI 39.0-58.1%). BTcP was further characterized in 59 patients. The mean (± SD) intensity of the BTcP episodes was 7.45 ± 1.47 in a visual analog scale. We found several statistically significant associations between the descriptive variables of BTcP with demographic and clinical variables associated with the tumor or the patient, such as an increased number of BTcP episodes per day depending on the presence or absence of diabetes (p = 0.001, Chi-square) or time to the onset of pain relief depending on the location of the tumor (p = 0.019, Chi-square). Fentanyl was the drug of choice in BTcP episodes for 95% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a high prevalence of BTcP prevalence in cancer patients undergoing pelvic 3D radiotherapy and with proctalgia. Although the variables determining the onset of BTcP are still unclear, our results could help in the design of future clinical studies addressing the treatment of BTcP in these patients.


Subject(s)
Breakthrough Pain/epidemiology , Cancer Pain/epidemiology , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pain/epidemiology , Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects , Rectal Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anus Neoplasms/drug therapy , Anus Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breakthrough Pain/drug therapy , Breakthrough Pain/etiology , Cancer Pain/drug therapy , Cancer Pain/etiology , Chi-Square Distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Endometrial Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pain/drug therapy , Prevalence , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Spain/epidemiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy
20.
Tech Coloproctol ; 23(3): 239-244, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30778784

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anorectal pain is a symptom which may have both structural and functional causes, and can, sometimes, develop into a chronic pain syndrome. Functional causes in particular are challenging to treat when conservative treatment measures fail. Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) can be applied to relax the anal sphincter and/or levator ani muscle to break the vicious circle of pain and contraction. In our tertiary referral proctology clinic, we evaluated the outcome of patients treated with BTX-A for chronic functional anorectal pain. METHODS: Our electronic database was searched for patients who had BTX-A treatment for chronic functional anorectal pain from 2011 to 2016. All medical data concerning history, treatments, and clinical outcome were retrieved. The clinical outcome (resolution of pain) was scored as good, temporary, or poor. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients [47 (42%) males; age 51years, SD 13 years, range 18-88 years] with chronic functional anorectal pain were included. The outcome of BTX-A treatment was good in 53 (47%), temporary in 23 (20%), and poor in 37 (33%). To achieve this outcome, 29 (45%) patients needed a single treatment, 11 (44%) a second treatment, and 13 (54%) ≥ 3 treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic functional anorectal pain can be treated successfully with BTX-A in 47% of patients who fail conservative management. Repeated injections may be needed to ensure complete cure in a subgroup of patients.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Neuromuscular Agents/therapeutic use , Pelvic Pain/drug therapy , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Anal Canal/drug effects , Anal Canal/physiopathology , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pelvic Pain/physiopathology , Rectal Diseases/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL