Efficacy of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid after surgical drainage of perianal abscess in the prevention of the development of anal fistula (PERIQxA study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Anorectal fistula, which is a relatively common pathology, is the chronic manifestation of the acute perirectal process that forms an anal abscess. The development of a fistula after incision and drainage of an anal abscess is seen in approximately 26-37%. Its treatment is a relevant topic, and the role of the use of antibiotic therapy in its prevention remains controversial, after the publication of several studies with contradictory results and several methodological limitations. Our hypothesis is that the combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid will reduce the incidence of anal fistula. METHOD: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotherapy after surgical drainage of perianal abscess in the development of perianal fistula. The PERIQxA study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. The study has been designed to include 286 adult patients who will be randomly (1:1) assigned to either the experimental (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 875/125 mg TDS for 7 days) or the control arm (placebo). The primary outcome measure is the percentage of patients that develop perianal fistula after surgery and during follow-up (6 months). DISCUSSION: This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amoxicillin/clavulanic in the prevention of perianal fistula. The results of this study are expected to contribute to stablish the potential role of antibiotherapy in the therapeutics for anal abscess. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Number: 2021-003376-14. Registered on November 26, 2021.

Preventing Rectourethral Fistula Recurrence With Gracilis Flap.

BACKGROUND: Rectourethral fistula (RUF) is an uncommon serious condition with various etiologies including neoplasm, radiation therapy, and surgery. Treatment for RUF remains problematic with a high recurrence rate. Although studies have suggested the recurrence rate of RUF is lower after surgical repair using a gracilis flap, outcomes have varied and the studies were small and inadequately controlled. Here, we compare outcomes of RUF repair with and without gracilis flap to evaluate its efficacy in preventing fistula recurrence and identify risk factors for recurrence. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who had undergone surgical repair for RUF between 2007 and 2018 at our institution and had at least 30 days of follow-up. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical outcomes were recorded and compared for patients who had gracilis flap repair and those who did not (controls). Single variable logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: The gracilis group (n = 24) and control group (n = 12) had similar demographics and comorbidities. Fistula recurrence was far less frequent in the gracilis group (8% vs 50%, P = 0.009). There were no significant differences in other outcomes including length of hospitalization and surgical complications. When recurrent RUF was treated with a muscle flap (gracilis or inferior gluteus), 83% of the group had no additional fistula recurrence. In the control group, history of radiation ( P = 0.04) and urinary incontinence ( P = 0.015) were associated with fistula recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using a gracilis flap for RUF repair given its association with lower recurrence without increased surgical complications.

Risk factors for postoperative recurrence of anal fistula identified by an international, evidence-based Delphi consultation survey of surgical specialists.

BACKGROUND: Despite the emerging knowledge about postoperative anal fistula recurrence (AFR) and the increasing number of clinical studies, there is no better understanding or consensus regarding the risk factors for AFR. The aim of this study was to generate international consensus guidance statements focusing on AFR. METHODS: A two-round modified Delphi process was conducted among international surgical specialists via an online survey delivered by email with a secure link created with Google Forms. Surgeons were asked to use a 9-point Likert scale to rate the importance of patient-, fistula-, and surgery-related statements developed based on our previous systematic review. Consensus was reached when at least 70% of panel members rated a statement as being of critical importance (ratings of 7-9). RESULTS: Of a total of 60 experts invited, 38 experts representing 13 countries from four continents agreed to participate in the first round of the Delphi process and 31 in the second round. In total, consensus was reached on 14 statements on the risk factors for AFR in three domains: patient-related risk factors included comorbid colitis, inflammatory bowel disease and use of immunosuppressants; fistula-related factors included transsphincteric fistula, number of fistula, horseshoe extension, undetected internal opening, location of anal fistula, recurrent fistula, suprasphincteric fistula, and height of the internal opening; and surgery-related factors included type of surgery, previous fistula surgery and surgeon. CONCLUSION: This Delphi study provides an evidence-based profile of risk factors for AFR in the patient-, surgery- and fistula-related domains from a global perspective. Clinically, these indicators can be incorporated to develop risk calculation tools for the early detection of AFR in high-risk patients, allowing early prevention and intervention.

Procedimiento LIFT en fístulas anales de localización posterior. ¿Son buenos los resultados? Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de estudios observacionales / LIFT procedure for posterior fistula-in-ano. Are outcomes good enough? A systematic review and meta-analysisis of observational studies

Introducción: El procedimiento LIFT para las FA de localización posterior ha sido cuestionado. Sin embargo esta controversia no ha sido analizada previamente y es el objetivo de esta revisión sistemática con metaanálisis. Material y método: Revisión sistemática PRISMA, de las bases MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library y Google Scholar hasta marzo de 2020. La evaluación de la calidad y sesgos de los estudios seleccionados se ha realizado mediante la escala Newcastle-Ottawa, según la AHRQ. Se empleó el método inverso de la varianza y el modelo de efectos aleatorios. Además, se realizó un análisis de sensibilidad y sobre el sesgo de publicación mediante funnel-plot y las pruebas de Beg y Egger. Resultados: No se apreciaron diferencias significativas en el porcentaje de recurrencias entre los pacientes con fístula posterior y el resto de localizaciones (OR 1,36 [IC 95% 0,60-3,07]; p=0,46). El valor I2 fue de 77%, lo cual muestra la heterogeneidad de resultados entre los estudios elegidos. Los 9 estudios incluidos presentaron una mediana ponderada (RI) de recidiva global del 37,8% (RI 18,3-47,7%), recidiva de fístula posterior del 47,1% (RI 30,7-63,7%) y de fístula no posterior del 36,3% (RI 15,8-51,3%) (p=0,436). Ni el número de pacientes ni la diferente calidad metodológica de los estudios explican el nivel de heterogeneidad de los mismos. No se demostró sesgo de publicación. (AU)

Introduction: Efficacy of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure for posterior fistula-in-ano remains under debate. However, there is scarcity of quality evidence analysing this issue. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes of LIFT surgery in patients with posterior anal fistula. Material and methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate efficacy of LIFT procedure for posterior anal fistula. MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar data sources were searched for key-words (MeSH terms): “LIFT” OR “Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract” AND “posterior anal fistula” OR “posterior fistula-in-ano”. Original, observational and experimental, non-language restriction studies published from January 2000 to March 2020 and reporting outcomes on LIFT procedure for posterior anal fistula were reviewed. Quality and potential biases were assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale, following AHRQ recommendations. Additional sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation (Beg and Egger's tets) were performed. Results: No significant differences were found in recurrence rate among patients undergoing LIFT procedure for posterior fistula-in-ano in contrast to other locations (OR 1.36 [IC 95% 0.60-3.07]; p=.46). I2 test value was 77%, expressing a fair heterogeneity among included studies. The weighed median for overall recurrence was 37.8% (RI 18.3-47.7%); with a weighed median of 47.1% (RI 30.7 - 63.7%) and 36.3% (RI 15.8-51.3%) (p=.436) respectively for recurrence after LIFT for posterior fistula and fistula in other locations. There was not clear evidence about the sample size (“n”) of included studies nor the disparities in quality assessment of those, could justify the observed heterogeneity. No significant publication bias was found. (AU)

Fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS) to prevent keyhole deformity in simple anal fistula: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Fistulotomy remains the gold standard for the surgical treatment of simple anal fistula, but may cause fecal incontinence and a characteristic anal 'keyhole' deformity. Although seemingly trivial, keyhole deformity may lead to bothersome symptoms such as anal pruritus and fecal soiling. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS), a technique with immediate sphincter reconstruction, in the treatment of simple anal fistula and the prevention of keyhole deformity created by simple fistulotomy. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on all consecutive patients who underwent FIPS for a simple anal fistula at our institution between January 2015 and August 2019. The primary outcome of the study was the rate of early postoperative wound dehiscence, which essentially transforms a FIPS into a simple fistulotomy and may lead to keyhole deformity. All patients received follow-up at regular intervals to evaluate fistula healing and the presence of keyhole deformity. RESULTS: FIPS was performed in 24 patients (median age: 52.8 years). After a median follow-up time of 3.0 (2.0, 6.3) months, the overall healing rate was 95.8% (23/24 patients). Six (25%) patients experienced early postoperative wound dehiscence resulting in the development of a keyhole deformity. Five of them were symptomatic (mainly soiling). Keyhole deformity was diagnosed at a median time of 6.0 (3.8, 7.5) months postoperatively. The occurrence of early wound dehiscence and subsequent keyhole deformity was associated with a posteriorly located fistula (p = .02). CONCLUSION: FIPS avoids the development of keyhole deformity in the majority of patients with simple anal fistula, but is less successful in posterior fistulas. Since FIPS is a very effective, fast and simple procedure, it should be considered a valid alternative for the treatment of every simple anal fistula.

Diverting colostomy is an effective procedure for ulcerative chronic radiation proctitis patients after pelvic malignancy radiation.

BACKGROUND: Chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) with rectal ulcer is a common complication after pelvic malignancy radiation, and gradually deteriorating ulcers will result in severe complications such as fistula. The aim of this study was to evaluate effect of colostomy on ulcerative CRP and to identify associated influence factors with effectiveness of colostomy. METHODS: Between November 2011 to February 2019, 811 hospitalized patients were diagnosed with radiation-induced enteritis (RE) in Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, among which 284 patients presented with rectal ulcer, and 61 ulcerative CRP patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The overall effective rate of colostomy on ulcerative CRP was 49.2%, with a highest effective rate of 88.2% within 12 to 24 months after colostomy. 9 (31.1%) CRP patients with ulcers were cured after colostomy and 12 (19.67%) patients restored intestinal continuity, among which including 2 (3.3%) patients ever with rectovaginal fistula. 100% (55/55) patients with rectal bleeding and 91.4% (32/35) patients with anal pain were remarkably alleviated. Additionally, multivariable analysis showed the duration of stoma [OR 1.211, 95% CI (1.060-1.382), P = 0.005] and albumin (ALB) level post-colostomy [OR 1.437, 95% CI (1.102-1.875), P = 0.007] were two independent influence factors for the effectiveness of colostomy on the rectal ulcer of CRP patients. CONCLUSIONS: Colostomy was an effective and safe procedure for treating rectal ulcer of CRP patients, and also a potential strategy for preventing and treating fistula. Duration of stoma for 12-24 months and higher ALB level could significantly improve the effectiveness of colostomy on ulcerative CRP patients.

[Application of closed negative pressure irrigation and suction device in the treatment of high perianal abscess].

Objective: To explore the efficacy of closed negative pressure irrigation and suction device (Patent number: Z200780013509.8) in the treatment of high perianal abscess. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2016, ≥18-year-old patients with primary high perianal abscess who were treated at our department were prospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria: (1) recurrent perianal abscess; (2) complicated with anal fistula formation; (3) preoperative, intraoperative or postoperative physical therapy, and curettage treatment, negative pressure irrigation; (4) Crohn's disease-related perianal abscess; (5) with immunosuppressive status, such as transplant recipients; (6) co-existence of malignant tumors, such as leukemia; (7) with diabetes; (8) those who could not receive long-term follow-up and were not suitable to participate in this study. According to the random number table method, the patients were randomly divided into negative pressure irrigation and suction group and routine drainage group. All patients were clearly diagnosed and the location and size of the perianal abscess were marked before surgery. These two groups were treated as follows: (1) Negative pressure irrigation and suction group: the skin was incised at a diameter of 1-2 cm at the site where the abscess fluctuated most obviously. After the abscess was removed, a closed negative pressure irrigation and suction device was installed and the pressure of -200 to -100 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) was maintained to keep the abscess cavity collapsed. Generally, the irrigation was stopped 5 days later or when the drainage was clear. The closed vacuum suction was maintained for 2 additional days, before the wound was sutured. (2) Conventional drainage group: conventional incision and drainage was carried out. The skin was cut at a diameter of 8 to 10 cm at the site of abscess with most obvious fluctuation. After the abscess was removed, normal saline gauze was used for dressing. Dressing was changed regularly until the wound healed. The efficacy, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, incision length, frequency of dressing change, pain index (visual analogue score, VAS score), postoperative healing time, complications, recurrence rate of perianal abscess, anal fistula formation rate were observed. The t test and χ2 test were used for comparison between the 2 groups. Results: There were both 40 patients in the negative pressure irrigation and suction group and the conventional drainage group. There were 28 males and 12 females in negative pressure irrigation and suction group with a mean age of (38.3±12.0) years and mean disease course of (6.6±2.1) days. The abscess in pelvic-rectal space accounted for 50.0% (20/40) and the mean diameter of abscess was (8.0±3.7) cm. There were 26 males and 14 females in the conventional drainage group with a mean age of (37.1±11.8) years and mean disease course of (6.4±2.5) days. The abscess in pelvic-rectal space accounted for 55.0% (22/40) and the diameter of abscess was (8.2±3.5) cm. The differences in baseline data between two groups were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Both groups successfully completed the operation. There was no significant difference in operative time between two groups (P>0.05). As compared to conventional drainage group, intraoperative blood loss in negative pressure irrigation and suction group was less [(12.1±5.5) ml vs. (18.3±4.4) ml, t=5.606, P<0.001], incision length was shorter [(2.3±0.8) cm vs. (7.6±1.7) cm, t=17.741, P<0.001], postoperative VAS pain scores at 1-, 3-, 7-, and 14-day after operation were lower [3.7±1.4 vs. 7.6±1.8, t=10.816, P<0.001; 3.0±1.3 vs. 6.8±1.6, t=11.657, P<0.001; 2.7±0.9 vs. 5.1±1.1, t=10.679, P<0.001; 1.2±0.3 vs. 1.6±0.4, t=5.060, P=0.019], the dressing change within 7 days after operation was less (3.5±1.2 vs. 12.6±2.7, t=19.478, P<0.001), postoperative healing time was shorter [(10.4±3.0) d vs. (13.5±3.8) d, t=4.049, P<0.001] and postoperative complication rate was lower [17.5% (7/40) vs. 2.5% (1/40), χ2=5.000, P=0.025]. During follow-up of 12 to 36 (24±5) months, the recurrence rate of perianal abscess within 1 year after operation and anal fistula formation rate in negative pressure irrigation and suction group were lower than those in conventional drainage group [5.0% (2/40) vs. 20.0% (8/40), χ2=4.114, P=0.042 and 2.5% (1/40) vs. 17.5% (7/40), χ2=5.000, P=0.025, respectirely]. The one-time cure rate of negative pressure irrigation and suction group and conventional drainage group was 92.5% (37/40) and 62.5%(25/40), respectirely (χ2=10.323, P=0.001). Conclusions: The application of the negative pressure irrigation and suction device in the treatment of high perianal abscess can improve the efficiency of one-time cure, reduce postoperative pain, accelerate healing time, decrease the morbidity of postoperative complication and the rates of abscess recurrence and anal fistula formation, indicating an improvement of the treatment.

Antibiotic use in prevention of anal fistulas following incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of anorectal abscesses continues to revolve around early surgical drainage and control of perianal sepsis. Yet even with prompt drainage, abscess recurrence and postoperative fistula formation rates are as high as 40% within 12 months. These complications are thought to be associated with inadequate drainage, elevated bacterial load, or a noncryptoglandular etiology of disease. Postoperative antibiotics have been used to account for these limitations, but their use is controversial and only weakly supported by current guidelines due to low-quality evidences. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature to determine the role of antibiotics in prevention of anal fistula following incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses. METHODS: Literature search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from 1946 to April 2018. Search terms were "perianal OR anal OR fistula-in-ano OR ischiorectal OR anorectal AND abscess AND antibiotics" and was limited to human studies in the English language. Literature review and data extraction were completed using PRISMA guidelines. A total of six studies with 817 patients were included for systematic review. The weighted mean age was 37.8 years, 20.4% of patients were female, and the follow up ranged from one to 30 months. Antibiotic courses varied by study, and duration ranged from five to 10 days. Of included patients, 358 (43.8%) underwent management without antibiotics while 459 (56.2%) patients were treated with antibiotics. Fistula rate in subjects receiving antibiotics was 16% versus 24% in those not receiving postoperative antibiotics. Meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant protective effect for antibiotic treatment (3 studies, OR 0.64; CI 0.43-0.96; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic therapy following incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses is associated with a 36% lower odds of fistula formation. An empiric 5-10-day course of antibiotics following operative drainage may avoid the morbidity of fistula formation in otherwise healthy patients, although quality of evidence is low. Further randomized trials are needed to fully clarify the role, duration, and type of antibiotics best suited for postoperative prevention of fistula following drainage of anorectal abscesses.

Higher Postinduction Infliximab Serum Trough Levels Are Associated With Healing of Fistulizing Perianal Crohn's Disease in Children.

Background: There is some evidence in adults that higher serum infliximab (IFX) levels are needed to adequately treat fistulizing perianal Crohn's disease (CD). However, data in children are lacking. We aimed to determine postinduction serum trough IFX levels that are associated with healing of fistulizing perianal CD (PCD) at week 24. Methods: In a multicenter inception cohort study, consecutive children younger than age 17 years with fistulizing perianal CD treated with IFX between April 2014 and June 2017 who had serum trough IFX titers measured before the fourth infusion were included. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated to determine the best cutoff to predict fistula healing. Results: A total of 667 children with Crohn's disease were recruited, with 85 (12.7%) patients diagnosed with fistulizing PCD. There were 27 of 52 (52%) children in whom pre-fourth infusion IFX levels were measured (mean age, 12.57 ± 5.12 years). At week 24, 14 of 27 (52%) patients responded with healing/healed PCD, whereas the rest had ongoing active fistulizing disease. The median IFX pre-fourth dose level in the responders was 12.7 ug/mL, compared with 5.4 ug/mL in the active disease group (P = 0.02). There was a strong correlation between IFX levels and healing of fistulizing PCD at week 24 (r = 0.65; P < 0.001). The AUROC was 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.97; P = 0.007) for pre-fourth IFX level to predict response of fistulizing PCD at week 24, and a level of 12.7 ug/mL best predicted fistula healing. Conclusions: Higher trough IFX levels are associated with healing of fistulizing perianal CD.

Use of indocyanine green in endometriosis surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To report and visually demonstrate the feasibility of using indocyanine green (ICG) in endometriosis surgery and to discuss potential benefits. DESIGN: ICG fluorescent imaging has been validated to assess tissue perfusion with clinical use in many medical fields, including gynecology and digestive surgery, but has not described in endometriosis surgery for bowel assessment. To our knowledge, there is no validated, objective, intraoperative method to assess the vascularity of the operated bowel in endometriosis surgery, a potentially good indicator for postoperative fistula formation. Our center is conducting a registered clinical trial examining the use of ICG to evaluate the bowel vascularization after endometriosis rectal shaving surgery, and the potential role in reducing fistula rates (Institutional Review Board no 2016-002773-35). SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PATIENT(S): Three patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) with the use of a rectal shaving procedure. INTERVENTIONS(S): Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for DIE with a rectal shaving procedure were injected with ICG intravenously at the end of endometriosis resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual assessment of the rectal shaving area was assessed as fluoresced or not with the use of a Likert-type scale (0 = no fluorescence; 4 = very good fluorescence). RESULT(S): After ICG injection, all three patients have showed very good fluorescence levels at the rectal shaving area with no adverse reactions. Other uses of ICG are demonstrated throughout the video (vaginal cuff, ureter, and ovary assessment). CONCLUSION(S): ICG fluorescent imaging is feasible in endometriosis surgery, and there is an ongoing trial to determine if its use reduces postoperative fistula formation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03080558.

Treatment of First-Time Perianal Abscess in Childhood, Balance Recurrence and Fistula Formation Rate with Medical Intervention.

PURPOSE: Because of differences in therapy for first-time perianal abscess, a wide range of recurrences and/or development of fistula-in-ano (RF) rates have been reported. The indication for determining when surgical intervention is needed remains obscure and controversial. This retrospective study sought to compare outcomes of conservative treatment with those after incision and drainage (ID) to determine the optimal time for surgical intervention. METHODS: A total of 697 patients with first-time perianal abscess were included in this study. The median patient age at the time of onset was 129 days (range: 5-5,110 days). The median follow-up period was 395 days (range: 120-760 days). RESULTS: Of the 697 patients with first-time perianal abscess, 355 (50.9%) patients who received conservative treatment had 12.7% (45/355) RF rate, which is less than that of abscesses treated with ID (24.6%, 72/297; p < 0.001). The median course was 23 (2,466) days, which did not differ significantly from that of abscesses with ID (18 [3,510] days) (p = 0.609). Forty-six (6.6%) patients with abscesses that perforated spontaneously had 10.9% (5/46) RF rate, which was less than that of abscesses with ID (p = 0.019), and the median course was 9 (3,316) days, which was shorter than that of abscesses with ID (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment is a safe and effective technique for most first-time perianal abscesses with less recurrence and a lower fistula formation rate. Incision must be performed when an abscess is likely to spread or shows no sign of spontaneous perforation.

Antibiotic therapy for prevention of fistula in-ano after incision and drainage of simple perianal abscess: A randomized single blind clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Much controversy exists regarding the role of antibiotics in the development of fistula in-ano after incision and drainage. We evaluated the role of postoperative antibiotics in the prevention of fistula in-ano after incision and drainage of perianal abscess. METHODS: In a randomized single blind clinical trial study, 307 patients were randomly selected from those referring for incision and drainage of perianal abscess at Shahid Faghihi Hospital, Shiraz, Iran, during September 2013 to September 2014. Patients were allocated randomly either to receive 7 days of oral metronidazole and ciprofloxacin in addition to their standard care or to only receive standard care without any antibiotics after they were discharged from the hospital. Patients were followed for 3 months and final results were evaluated. The study was registered at the clinical trial registry (www.irct.ir; Irct201311049936n7). RESULTS: Seven patients were lost to follow-up. Those who used prophylactic antibiotics (n = 155) had significantly lower rates of fistula formation compared with those who did not use any medication (n = 144; P < .001). Men had higher rates of fistula formation (P = .002). Patients who used more cigarettes had higher rates of fistula development (P = .001). In the univariate analysis, only postoperative antibiotic use showed a protective role against fistula formation (odds ratio = 0.426; confidence interval, 0.206-0.881). In the regression analysis postoperative antibiotic use remained protective against fistula development (odds ratio = 0.371; confidence interval, 0.196-0.703), furthermore male sex presented as a risk factor for developing fistula in-ano (odds ratio = 3.11; confidence interval, 1.31-7.38). CONCLUSION: Postoperative prophylactic antibiotic therapy including ciprofloxacin and metronidazole play an important role in preventing fistula in-ano formation. Considering the complications of fistula in-ano formation and the minor side effects of antibiotic therapy, based on our results, a 7-10 course of postoperative antibiotics is advised after incision and drainage of perianal abscess.

[Perianal infection in patients with hemoblastosis: Risk factors and possibilities of prevention]. / Perianal'naya infektsiya u bol'nykh gemoblastozami: faktory riska i vozmozhnosti profilaktiki.

AIM: to identify poor prognostic factors for perianal infection (PI) in patients with hemoblastosis and to define an effective tactic for preventive and therapeutic measures. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The prospective study enrolled 72 patients (37 men and 35 women; mean age, 47 years) with hemoblastosis that was complicated by the development of one of the following forms of PI: abscess, infiltrate, multiple ulcers. Different clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients were examined to identify risk factors for PI. The species-specific concordance of microorganisms isolated from the anus and blood in the development of PI was assessed to record the latter as a source of sepsis. Treatment policy was defined according to the clinical form of PI. RESULTS: Acute myeloid leukemias and lymphomas were the most common background diseases in 30 (41.7%) and 22 (30.6%) patients, respectively. During induction chemotherapy cycles, perianal tissue infection occurred twice more frequently (66%) than totally at the onset of hemoblastosis (13%) and after achievement of remission (during consolidation and maintenance therapy) (21%; Fisher's exact test; p=0.01). PI in agranulocytosis was more than twice as common as in its absence: 69.4% vs 30.6% (p=0.01) and was responsible for sepsis in 9 (18%) of 50 patients. The main source of perianal tissue infection in patients with granulocytopenia was anal fissures and fistulas and ulcers of the anal canal: 44 (88%) cases of the 50 cases. In PI as an abscess, the average white blood cell count was 5 times higher (p=0.01) than that in PI as an infiltrate (or multiple ulcers): 6.6·109/l and 1.2·109 g/l. Abscess formation was observed in 16 (22.2%) patients and an indication for surgical drain. The inflammatory infiltrate was found to develop in 48 (66.7%) patients; multiple ulcers were seen in 8 (11.1%); in this group, parenteral antimicrobial therapy proved to be effective in 36 (78%) patients. 29 patients were operated on for anal fissures and fistulas at intercycle intervals. After continuing CT, PI recurrences were observed in 4 (9.1%) patients. In the operated versus medically treated patients, the risk of complications associated with abnormalities in the perianal area during continued CT was 5 times statistically significantly lower (odds ratio=0.2; 95% confidence interval 0.1 to 0.5; p=0.04; Cochran-Mantel test). CONCLUSION: Induction CT cycles, the status of granulocytopenia, and the presence of infection sources in the anal canal as an anal fissure, skin ulcerations, or a fistula should be considered as independent statistically significant prognostic risk factors for PI. The number of granulocytes determines the form of inflammation, the course of infection, and the chance of developing sepsis. The effective prevention encompassing surgical treatment for anal canal diseases reduces the risk of septic complications and the number of paraproctitis recurrences, contributing to the implementation of a planned CT program in patients with hemoblastosis.

Full mucosal proctectomy initiated below the dentate line may prevent the development of a perianal fistula after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term functional results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) with mucosal proctectomy (MP) for ulcerative colitis (UC) are satisfactory but may be compromised by perianal fistulae. METHODS: We analyzed the effect of the level of MP (above or below the dentate line) on the risk of perianal fistulae in 151 patients undergoing IPAA for UC. RESULTS: A postoperative perianal fistula occurred in 12 patients (10 with MP from the level above the dentate line and 2 below). Patients developing perianal fistulae after IPAA were significantly younger at IPAA (23 vs. 32 years, p = 0.015). Age <25 years at UC onset (hazard ratio, HR, 3.5, p = 0.041), age <30 years at IPAA (HR 4.3, p = 0.015) and MP above the dentate line (HR 4.7, p = 0.010) were significant risk factors for perianal fistulae after IPAA. Multivariate analysis showed that age <30 years at IPAA (HR 4.4, p = 0.018) and MP above the dentate line (HR 6.0, p = 0.012) were significant risk factors. CONCLUSION: IPAA with MP below the dentate line for UC might reduce the risk of postoperative perianal fistulae.

Crypto-glandular fistulous paraproctites--is the surgical prophylaxis of reccurences imperative?

It is done an analysis of 191 patients operated on for crypto-glandular chronic fistulous paraproctitis. The age of the patients vary 21 to 76 years and the male:female proportion is 2,25 to 1. In 164 patients it was first operation for fistula-in-ano and in 27 cases it was a consecutive one for reccurence. There was intervened a concomitant other disease of the anal channel which pathogenetically predispose the development of fistula in 54 (28%) cases. The patients were discharged 1-3 days after surgery. Ambulant control and ligature procedures up to the 30th day were done. A follow up was done of 118 patients (68%) for period of 3 to 12 months. In all the followed up patients was registered full continence and good tonus of the anal sphincters. Recurrences were registered in 8 cases with fibrin glue occlusion of the fistula. There are no registered cases of recurrences by the followed up patients after fistulotomy and excision-ligature methods. The authors review in the discussion the pathogenetical predisposition for paraproctitis in consequence of other diseases of the anal channel and the necessity of surgical prophylaxis of recurrences.

[Significance of nontraumatic anal sphincter relaxation for the success of plastic and miniinvasive interventions in coloproctology].

The investigation objective was to estimate the role of nontraumatic anal sphincter (AS) stretching, as a leading factor of success in minimally invasive and/or plastic proctological interventions. One-centre randomized investigation was performed in 83 patients: In 22 of them the AS fissura was revealed (in 16), suprasphincteric fistula (in 3) and coexistent rectocele 2-3 Ap (according to POP-Q classification) with thinning of the AS anterior segment, the degree III hemorrhoids and anterior AS fissure presence. Ninety units of botulotoxin preparation (Disport) were injected between internal and external AS portions 5-15 days preoperatively. The treatment results without botulotoxin injection were compared retrospectively. After botulotoxin injection performance the AS spasm elimination was noted, leading to the pain subsiding promotion before and postoperatively in all the patients observed. The spasm elimination have permitted to escape the anal high fistula recurrence as a result of the mucosal flap shift after intraluminal closure of the fistula or because of the fistula intermuscular electrowelding "suture" rupture, also have guaranteed the plastic sutures on AS, even while the stage II-III rectocele presence, not depending of performance of its simultant surgica correction.

Waiting for attention and care: birthing accounts of women in rural Tanzania who developed obstetric fistula as an outcome of labour.

BACKGROUND: Obstetric fistula is a physically and socially disabling obstetric complication that affects about 3,000 women in Tanzania every year. The fistula, an opening that forms between the vagina and the bladder and/or the rectum, is most frequently caused by unattended prolonged labour, often associated with delays in seeking and receiving appropriate and adequate birth care. Using the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality of care (AAAQ) concept and the three delays model, this article provides empirical knowledge on birth care experiences of women who developed fistula after prolonged labour. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach to explore the birthing experiences of women affected by fistula and the barriers to access adequate care during labour and delivery. Sixteen women were interviewed for the qualitative study and 151 women were included in the quantitative survey. All women were interviewed at the Comprehensive Community Based Rehabilitation Tanzania in Dar es Salaam and Bugando Medical Centre in Mwanza. RESULTS: Women experienced delays both before and after arriving at a health facility. Decisions on where to seek care were most often taken by husbands and mothers-in-law (60%). Access to health facilities providing emergency obstetric care was inadequate and transport was a major obstacle. About 20% reported that they had walked or were carried to the health facility. More than 50% had reported to a health facility after two or more days of labour at home. After arrival at a health facility women experienced lack of supportive care, neglect, poor assessment of labour and lack of supervision. Their birth accounts suggest unskilled birth care and poor referral routines. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals major gaps in access to and provision of emergency obstetric care. It illustrates how poor quality of care at health facilities contributes to delays that lead to severe birth injuries, highlighting the need to ensure women's rights to accessible, acceptable and adequate quality services during labour and delivery.

Anal fistula: intraoperative difficulties and unexpected findings.

Anal fistula surgery is a commonly performed procedure. The diverse anatomy of anal fistulae and their proximity to anal sphincters make accurate preoperative diagnosis essential to avoid recurrence and fecal incontinence. Despite the fact that proper preoperative diagnosis can be reached in the majority of patients by simple clinical examination, endoanal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging, on many occasions, unexpected findings can be encountered during surgery that can make the operation difficult and correct decision-making crucial. In this article we discuss the difficulties and unexpected findings that can be encountered during anal fistula surgery and how to overcome them.

Why do we have to review our experience in managing cases with idiopathic fistula-in-ano regularly?

"Why do we have to review our experience in managing idiopathic fistula-in-ano regularly?" In order to answer this apparently simple question, we reviewed our clinical and surgical cases and most important relevant literature to find a rational and scientific answer. It would appear that whatever method you adopt in fistula management, there is a price to pay regarding either rate of recurrence (higher with conservative methods) or impairment of continence (higher with traditional surgery). Since, at the moment, reliable data to identify a treatment as a gold standard in the management of anal fistulas are lacking, the correct approach to this condition must consider all the anatomic and clinicopathological aspects of the disease; this knowledge joined to an eclectic attitude of the surgeon, who should be familiar with different types of treatment, is the only guarantee for a satisfactory treatment. As a conclusion, it is worthwhile to remember that adequate initial treatment significantly reduces recurrence, which, when it occurs, is usually due to failure to recognise the tract and primary opening at the initial operation.

Establishment of a rescue program for anorectal malformations induced by retinoic acid in mice.

AIMS OF STUDY: Retinoid-mediated signal transduction plays a crucial role in the embryogenesis of various organs. We previously reported the successful induction of anorectal malformations in mice using retinoic acid (RA). Retinoic acid controls the expression of essential target genes for cell differentiation, morphogenesis, and apoptosis through a complicated interaction in which RA receptors form heterodimers with retinoid X receptors. In the present study, we investigated whether the retinoid antagonist, LE135, could prevent the induction of anorectal malformations (ARMs) in mice. METHODS: Retinoic acid was intraperitoneally administered as 100 mg/kg of all-trans RA on E9; and then the retinoid antagonist, LE135, was intraperitoneally administered to pregnant ICR strain mice on the eighth gestational day (E8), 1 day before administration of RA (group B) or on E9, simultaneously (group C) with RA administration. All of the embryos were obtained from the uteri on E18. Frozen sections were evaluated for concentric layers around the endodermal epithelium by hematoxylin and eosin staining. RESULTS: In group A, all of the embryos demonstrated ARM with rectoprostatic urethral fistula, or rectocloacal fistula, and all of the embryos showed the absence of a tail. In group B, 36% of the embryos could be rescued from ARM. However, all of the rescued embryos had a short tail that was shorter than their hind limb. The ARM rescue rates in group B were significantly improved compared to those in group A (P < .01). In group C, 45% of the embryos were rescued from ARM, but all of the rescued embryos had short tail. The ARM rescue rate in group C was significantly improved compared to that in group A (P < .01). However, there was no significant difference in the ARM rescue rate between group B and Group C. CONCLUSION: The present study provides evidence that in the hindgut region, RAR selective retinoid antagonist, LE135, could rescue embryos from ARM. However, the disturbance of all-trans RA acid was limited to the caudal region. Further study to establish an appropriate rescue program for ARM in a mouse model might suggest a step toward protection against human ARM in the future.