The value of microvascular breast reconstruction: Cost equivalence of TRAM and DIEP flaps implications in the era of CMS reforms.

BACKGROUND: Recent CMS billing changes have raised concerns about insurance coverage for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. This study compared the costs and utilization of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM), DIEP, and latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps in breast reconstruction. METHOD: The study utilized the National Inpatient Sample database to identify female patients who underwent DIEP, TRAM, and LD flap procedures from 2016 to 2019. Key data such as patient demographics, length of stay, complications, and costs (adjusted to 2021 USD) were analyzed, focusing on differences across the flap types. RESULTS: A total of 17,770 weighted patient encounters were identified, with the median age being 51. The majority underwent DIEP flaps (73.5%), followed by TRAM (14.2%) and LD (12.1%) flaps. The findings revealed that DIEP and TRAM flaps had a similar length of stay (LOS), while LD flaps typically had a shorter LOS. The total hospital charges to costs using cost-to-charge ratio were also comparable between DIEP and TRAM flaps, whereas LD flaps were significantly less expensive. Factors such as income quartile, primary payer of hospitalization, and geographic region significantly influenced flap choice. CONCLUSION: The study's results appear to contradict the prevailing notion that TRAM flaps are more cost-effective than DIEP flaps. The total hospital charges to costs using cost-to-charge ratio and hospital stays associated with TRAM and DIEP flaps were found to be similar. These findings suggest that changes in the insurance landscape, which may limit the use of DIEP flaps, could undermine patient autonomy while not necessarily reducing healthcare costs. Such policy shifts could favor less costly options like the LD flap, potentially altering the landscape of microvascular breast reconstruction.

Continuing Insurance Coverage for Flap-Based Breast Reconstruction: Is There a Reservation Cost Related to a Woman's Abdominal Flap Choice?

BACKGROUND: The recent proposed alterations to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regulations, although subsequently reversed on August 21, 2023, have engendered persistent concerns regarding the impact of insurance policies on breast reconstruction procedures coverage. This study aimed to identify factors that would influence women's preferences regarding autologous breast reconstruction to better understand the possible consequences of these coverage changes. METHODS: A survey of adult women in the United States was conducted via Amazon Mechanical Turk to assess patient preferences for breast reconstruction options, specifically deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap surgery. The Cochrane-Armitage test evaluated trends in flap preferences concerning incremental out-of-pocket payment increases. RESULTS: Of 500 total responses, 485 were completed and correctly answered a verification question to ensure adequate attention to the survey, with respondents having a median (interquartile range) age of 26 (25-39) years. When presented with the advantages and disadvantages of DIEP versus TRAM flaps, 78% of respondents preferred DIEP; however, as DIEP's out-of-pocket price incrementally rose, more respondents favored the cheaper TRAM option, with $3804 being the "indifference point" where preferences for both procedures converged (P < 0.001). Notably, respondents with a personal history of breast reconstruction showed a higher preference for DIEP, even at a $10,000 out-of-pocket cost (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Out-of-pocket cost can significantly influence women's choices for breast reconstruction. These findings encourage a reevaluation of emergent insurance practices that could potentially increase out-of-pocket costs associated with DIEP flaps, to prevent cost from decreasing equitable patient access to most current reconstructive options.

Transverse division of the rectus abdominis muscle in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap elevation: A rescue technique to include more than one perforator.

BACKGROUND: It is important to include as many perforators as possible in order to enhance the vascularity of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. However, the rectus muscle must be transected transversely, which prevents suturing and can cause a defect along the same line as the muscle-sparing procedure. When harvesting the DIEP flap, no specific method was suggested to solve these muscle defects. We found that by transecting the rectus muscle transversely, the muscle could be sutured in the tendinous area more easily while maintaining muscle function. The purpose of this study is to confirm the long-term recovery of the rectus abdominis muscle through the volume change after DIEP flap using this tendinous transection and suture method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 28 patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap and the tendinous transection method for multiple perforators between May 2018 and April 2020 was conducted. The preoperative and postoperative volumes of the rectus abdominis muscle were estimated both the harvest and opposite sides. RESULTS: The preoperative and postoperative muscle volumes from the harvest side were 50.08 ± 8.71 cm3 and 48.56 ± 8.61 cm3, respectively. The volume difference was 1.522 cm3 decrease, which was not statistically significant (p = .070). The preoperative and postoperative muscle volumes from the opposite side were 50.50 ± 8.15 cm3 and 50.08 ± 8.18 cm3, respectively. The volume difference was 0.434 cm3 increase and was not statistically significant (p = .064). Postoperative volume changes in the rectus muscle were not statistically significant on either side. CONCLUSION: The tendinous transection method in the DIEP flap procedure did not significantly affect postoperative rectus muscle volume. Therefore, we expect this harvest method to allow DIEP flap reconstruction that includes multiple perforators and complete donor muscle recovery.

Comparison of complications and functional outcomes following total or subtotal glossectomy with laryngeal preservation using a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator free flap versus a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous free flap.

OBJECTIVE: Wide defects resulting from subtotal or total glossectomy are commonly reconstructed using a bulk flap to maintain oral and speech functions. The flap, including muscle tissue, diminishes with time. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator and rectus abdominis musculocutaneous free flap reconstructions after glossectomy with laryngeal preservation. METHODS: Medical records of 13 and 26 patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric artery perforator and rectus abdominis musculocutaneous free flap reconstructions, respectively, from 2014 to 2022 at our institution were reviewed. Patients who underwent middle pharynx resection except for the base of the tongue, mandibular bone resection, and sensory reinnervation were excluded. RESULTS: The rectus abdominis musculocutaneous groups showed a higher number of lymph node dissection and shorter operative time than the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator groups. No significant differences in postoperative complications or functional oral intake scale scores at 6 months were observed. Volumetric changes on computed tomography images at 6 and 12 months were significantly lower in the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator group. Cancer recurrence was significantly associated with reduced oral function. CONCLUSIONS: Oral function in patients with cancer is influenced by various other factors. However, the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap may be suitable for tongue reconstruction because of the minimal postoperative changes in flap volume, easy adjustment of flap thickness, elevation of multiple flaps, and minimal complications at the donor site.

IDEAL Phase 2a Results: Posterior Rectus Sheath Flap for Hiatal Augmentation in Complex Paraesophageal Hernias.

OBJECTIVE: To report the developmental phase results of posterior rectus sheath hiatal flap augmentation (PoRSHA), a promising surgical innovation for large and recurrent paraesophageal hernias. BACKGROUND: Durable hernia repair for large paraesophageal hernias continues to be a surgical challenge. PoRSHA addresses the challenges of current and historical approaches to complex paraesophageal hernias and demonstrates significant promise as a successful alternative approach. METHODS: Using the IDEAL framework, we outline the technical modifications made over the first 27 consecutive cases using PoRSHA. Outcomes measured included hernia recurrence on routine imaging at 6 months and 2 years, development of a postoperative abdominal wall eventration and incidence of solid food dysphagia. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients at our single institution with type III (n=12), type IV (n=7), or recurrent (n=8) paraesophageal hernias underwent PoRSHA. Surgery was safely and successfully carried out in all cases. Stability of the technique was reached after 16 cases, resulting in 4 main repair types. At an average follow-up of 11 months, we observed no radiologic recurrences, no abdominal eventrations or hernias at the donor site, and 1 patient with occasional solid food dysphagia that resolved with dilation. CONCLUSIONS: PoRSHA can not only be safely added to conventional hiatal hernia repair with appropriate training but also demonstrates excellent short-term outcomes. While the long-term durability with 5-year follow-up is still needed, here we provide cautious optimism that PoRSHA may represent a novel solution to the long-standing high recurrence rates observed with current complex PEH repair.

Soft-tissue reconstruction with pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after total or high sacrectomy for giant sacral tumor.

BACKGROUND: The large soft-tissue defect after total or high sacrectomy for giant sacral tumor induces high incidence of wound complications. It remains a huge challenge to reconstruct the soft-tissue defect and achieve the preferred clinical outcome. METHODS: A total of 27 patients undergoing one-stage total or high sacrectomy for giant sacral tumors between 2016 and 2021 in a tertiary university hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Participants were divided into two groups. Thirteen patients underwent a pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap reconstruction, whereas 14 patients underwent a conventional wound closure. Patient's clinical characteristics, surgical duration, postoperative complications, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Patients in VRAM and non-VRAM groups were similar in baseline characteristics. The mean tumor size was 12.85 cm (range: 10-17 cm) in VRAM group and 11.79 cm (range: 10-14.5 cm) in non-VRAM group (P = 0.139). The most common giant sacral tumor is chordoma. Patients in VRAM group had a shorter length of drainage (9.85 vs 17.14 days), postoperative time in bed (5.54 vs 17.14 days), and total length of stay (19.46 vs 33.36 days) compared with patients in non-VRAM group. Patients in the VRAM group had less wound infection and debridement than patients in non-VRAM group (15.4% vs 57.1%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the advantages of pedicled VRAM flap reconstruction of large soft-tissue defects after high or total sacrectomy using the anterior-posterior approach. This choice of reconstruction is better than direct wound closure in terms of wound infection, length of drainage, and total length of stay.

Updated Trends and Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction in the United States, 2016-2019.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) has increased in recent decades, although concerns for access remain. As such, our goal is to trend national demographics and operative characteristics of ABR in the United States. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample, 2016-2019, the International Classification of Disease , Tenth Edition codes identified adult female encounters undergoing ABR. Demographics and procedure-related characteristics were recorded. Discharge weights generated national estimates. Statistical analysis included univariate testing and multivariate regression modeling. RESULTS: A total of 52,910 weighted encounters met the criteria (mean age, 51.5 ± 10.0 years). Autologous breast reconstruction utilization increased (Δ = +5%), 2016-2019, primarily driven by a rise in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) reconstructions (Δ = +28%; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.070; P < 0.001), which were predominant throughout the study period (69%). More recent surgery year, bilateral reconstruction, higher income levels, commercial insurance, and care in the South US region increased the odds of DIEP-based ABR ( P ≤ 0.036). Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps, bilateral reconstructions, higher comorbidity levels, and experiencing complications increased the length of stay ( P ≤ 0.038). Most ABRs (75%) were privately insured. The rates of immediate reconstructions increased over the study period (from 26% to 46%; IRR, 1.223; P < 0.001), as did the rates of bilateral reconstructions (from 54% to 57%; IRR, 1.026; P = 0.030). The rates of ABRs performed at teaching hospitals remained high (90% to 93%; P = 0.242). CONCLUSIONS: As of 2019, ABR has become more prevalent, with the DIEP flap constituting the most common modality. With the increasing ABR popularity, efforts should be made to ensure geographic and financial accessibility.

Trunk Muscle Function and Core Stability in Women Who Had Muscle-Sparing Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Breast Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The long-term effects of the unilateral muscle-sparing pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAMmsp) flap procedure on trunk muscle performances and core stability were investigated in women with breast cancer. METHODS: Forty women (mean age = 42.6 years) who had received breast reconstruction with the unilateral TRAMmsp flap procedure no less than 6 months earlier (mean = 10.3 [standard deviation, SD = 4.9] months) (TRAM group) participated, and 30 women who were healthy and matched for age (mean age = 41.2 years) served as controls (control group). Their abdominal and back muscle strength was assessed using the curl-up and prone extension tests, respectively, and their static abdominal muscle endurance and back extensor endurance were assessed using the sit-up endurance test in the crook-lying position and the Biering-Sørensen test, respectively. Core stability strength was assessed using a 4-level limb-lowering test (abdominal muscle test), and core stability endurance was assessed while lying supine with both flexed legs 1 inch off the mat while keeping the pelvis in a neutral position with a pressure biofeedback unit. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, trunk muscles of the TRAM group were weaker, showing less endurance, as were their core stability strength and endurance. Static trunk muscle endurances and trunk flexion strength were associated with core stability in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Women exhibit trunk flexor and extensor weakness along with poor endurance and impaired core stability even after an average of 10 months from receiving the TRAMmsp flap procedure. Immobilization after surgery, with possible systemic inflammatory effects from surgery and chemotherapy, might have further contributed to the generalized weakness subsequent to the partial harvesting of the rectus abdominis. IMPACT: Women after breast reconstruction with the TRAMmsp flap procedure show long-lasting deficits of strength and endurance in abdominal muscles, back extensors, and core stability. Proactive measures including early detection and evaluation of impairments as well as timely intervention targeting these clients are important to minimize the dysfunction and support their return to community participation.

Supra-arcuate free fascial MS-TRAM, a modified technique to reduce donor site morbidity in obese population-comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Abdomen-based free flaps represent the gold standard option in the armamentarium of breast reconstruction. The natural evolution to more preservation with less invasive forms of these flaps has been driven by both patient and surgeon satisfaction. Nevertheless, obese patients are challenging due to the increased risk of compromised flap perfusion and donor site morbidity. This challenge is compounded by the prevalence of obesity worldwide, resulting in more free abdominal flaps being performed for breast reconstruction in obese patients. The authors present the outcomes of a modified supra-arcuate fascial muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous (FMS-TRAM) technique compared to standard muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) technique to reduce the donor site morbidity while providing a well-vascularized large volume of autologous tissue. METHODS: A retrospective comparative data analysis was conducted at two centers: Cairo University Hospitals, Egypt, and University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom. Standard MS-TRAM was performed in 65 patients between 2008 and 2011 (Group 1) versus 275 patients between 2011 and 2020 (Group 2) who underwent FMS-TRAM. The modified technique involved limiting the fascial incision to above or at the level of the arcuate line to preserve the integrity of the anterior rectus sheath caudally. All patients included were of the obese population (BMI≥30 kg/m2 ) and underwent unilateral post-mastectomy reconstruction. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative details, and outcomes focusing on donor site morbidity and flap complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The median age and BMI for Group 1 were 43 and 32, respectively. While for Group 2, they were 47 and 33, respectively. Flap weight ranged from 560 to 1470 g (Mean 705) for Group 1, while Group 2 ranged from 510 to 1560 (mean 715). The majority (280/340 [82%]) of the patients in both groups received radiotherapy. 7.7% of Group 1 were smokers, while in Group 2 it was 4.7%. The percentage of delayed versus immediate reconstruction in Group 1 was 60%/40%, while in Group 2, it was 43%/56%. The incidence of fat necrosis, partial necrosis, and total necrosis was 7.6%.1.5%, and 3%, respectively, for Group 1 and 8%, 1.4%, and 2.6%, respectively, for Group 2. The two-tailed p-value demonstrated a significant statistical difference (p < 0.00001) in donor site morbidity between both groups, with more bulge 20% (13/65) and hernia 1.5% (2/65) occurrence in Group 1 versus 1.9% (5/275) and 0.7% (2/275) in Group 2 respectively, over a follow-up period ranging from 24 to 60 months (mean 32). CONCLUSION: FMS-TRAM flaps are safe, robust, and reliable with less donor site morbidity while maintaining optimal flap perfusion for large volume flaps in obese patients with excellent, durable outcomes. It should be considered a valuable tool in the reconstructive armamentarium of breast reconstruction.

Primary flap closure of perineal defects to avoid empty pelvis syndrome after pelvic exenteration in gynecologic malignancies: An old question to explore a new answer.

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a radical oncological surgical procedure proposed in patients with recurrent or persistent gynecological cancers. The radical alteration of pelvic anatomy and of pelvic floor integrity can cause major postoperative complications. Fortunately, PE can be combined with reconstructive procedures to decrease complications and functional and support problems of pelvic floor, reducing morbility and mortality and increasing quality of life. Many options for reconstructive surgery have been described, especially a wide spectrum of surgical flaps. Different selection criteria have been proposed to select patients for primary perineal defect flap closure without achieving any strict indication of the best option. The aim of this review is to focus on technical aspects and the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, providing an overview of those most frequently used for the treatment of pelvic floor defects after PE. Flaps based on the deep inferior epigastric artery, especially vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM) flaps, and gracilis flaps, based on the gracilis muscle, are the most common reconstructive techniques used for pelvic floor and vaginal reconstruction. In our opinion, reconstructive surgery may be considered in case of total PE or type II/III PE and in patients submitted to prior pelvic irradiation. VRAM could be used to close extended defects at the time of PE, while gracilis flaps can be used in case of VRAM complications. Fortunately, numerous choices for reconstructive surgery have been devised. As these techniques continue to evolve, it is advisable to adopt an integrated, multi-disciplinary approach within a tertiary medical center.

Effect of differing flap reconstruction strategies in perineal closure following advanced pelvic oncological resection: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Advancing approaches to locally invasive pelvic malignancy creates a large tissue defect resulting in perineal wound complications, dehiscence, and perineal hernia. Use of reconstructive flaps such as vertical rectus abdominus myocutaneous (VRAM) flap, gracilis, anterolateral thigh and gluteal flaps have been utilised in our institution to address perineal closure. The authors compared outcomes using different flap techniques along with primary perineal closure in advanced pelvic oncological resection. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing advanced pelvic oncological resection in a single tertiary hospital was retrospectively analysed. This study included consecutive patients between 2014 and 2021 according to the Strengthening The Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery (STROCSS) criteria. Primary outcome measures were the frequency of postoperative perineal complications between primary closure, VRAM, gluteal and thigh (anterolateral thigh and gracilis) reconstruction. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two patients underwent advanced pelvic resection with perineal closure. Of these, 40 patients underwent extra-levator abdominoperineal resection, and 70 patients underwent pelvic exenteration. Sixty-four patients received reconstructive flap closure, which included VRAM (22), gluteal (21) and thigh flaps (19). Perineal infection and dehiscence rates were low. Infection rates were lower in the flap group despite a higher rate of radiotherapy ( P <0.050). Reoperation rates were infrequent (<10%) but specific for each flap, such as donor-site hernia following VRAM and flap dehiscence after thigh flap reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who are at high risk of postoperative perineal infections, reconstructive flap closure offers acceptable outcomes. VRAM, gluteal and thigh flaps offer comparable outcomes and can be tailored to the individual patient.

Perineal wound complications after vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap and mesh closure following abdominoperineal surgery and pelvic exenteration of anal and rectal cancers: A meta-analysis.

A meta-analysis research was implemented to appraise the perineal wound complications (PWCs) after vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap and mesh closure (MC) following abdominoperineal surgery (AS) and pelvic exenteration (PE) of anal and rectal cancers. Inclusive literature research till April 2023 was done and 2008 interconnected researches were revised. Of the 20 picked researches, enclosed 2972 AS and PE of anal and rectal cancers persons were in the utilized researchers' starting point, 1216 of them were utilizing VRAM flap, and 1756 were primary closure (PC). Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized to appraise the consequence of VRAM flap in treating AS and PE of anal and rectal cancers by the dichotomous approach and a fixed or random model. VRAM flap had significantly lower PWCs (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98, p < 0.001), and major PWCs (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32-0.80, p = 0.004) compared to PC in AS and PE of anal and rectal cancers persons. However, VRAM flap and PC had no significant difference in minor PWCs (OR, 1; 95% CI, 0.54-1.85, p = 1.00) in AS and PE of anal and rectal cancer persons. VRAM flap had significantly lower PWCs, and major PWCs, however, no significant difference was found in minor PWCs compared to PC in AS and PE of anal and rectal cancers persons. However, caution needs to be taken when interacting with its values since there was a low sample size of most of the chosen research found for the comparisons in the meta-analysis.

Fascia turnover procedure at breast reconstruction using free TRAM flap for decreasing umbilical migration.

BACKGROUND: The ideal umbilical position is midway between the two iliac crests. Some patients complained that the umbilicus position shifted from the midline after the breast reconstruction with a free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flap. We considered that the fascia of the external oblique muscle could be applied to the rectus abdominis fascia defect. This study aimed to introduce this "fascia turnover procedure" and compare the umbilical position in this procedure with that in primary fascial closure for the MS-TRAM flap of breast reconstruction. METHODS: A total of 152 patients were enrolled (80 patients with fascia turnover (+) vs. 72 patients (-)). The patients' demographics were compared. Horizontal distances (right side: a; left side: b) were measured bilaterally from the lateral abdominal wall to the center of the umbilicus. Frontal abdominal photographs were taken preoperatively (a1, b1) and postoperatively (a2, b2). The rate of umbilical migration (= | (a1 - b1) / (a1 + b1) - (a2 - b2) / (a2 + b2) | × 100%) was calculated. Because the aponeurosis of the external oblique muscle is confirmed in front of the lateral side of the anterior rectus sheath, this procedure could be performed in cases with a medial defect. RESULTS: No significant differences in the patients' demographics, including abdominal bulging rates and abdominal wall defect widths were observed between the two groups. The rate of umbilical migration showed a significant difference (median 1.78% vs. 3.70%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This procedure could decrease the rate of umbilical migration.

Comparison of inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps versus vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps in the reconstruction of perineal wounds.

BACKGROUND: Achieving a healed perineal wound following chemoradiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection (APR) is challenging for surgeons and patients. Prior studies have shown trunk-based flaps, including vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flaps, are superior to both primary closure and thigh-based flaps; however, there has been no direct comparison with gluteal fasciocutaneous flaps. This study evaluates postoperative complications after various methods of perineal flap closure of APR and pelvic exenteration defects. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent APR or pelvic exenteration from April 2008 through September 2020 was analyzed for postoperative complications. Flap closure techniques, including VRAM, unilateral (IGAP), and bilateral (BIGAP) inferior gluteal artery perforator fasciocutaneous flaps, were compared. RESULTS: Of 116 patients included, the majority underwent fasciocutaneous (BIGAP/IGAP) flap reconstruction (n = 69, 59.6%), followed by VRAM (n = 47, 40.5%). There were no significant differences between group patient demographics, comorbidities, body mass index, or cancer stage. There were no significant differences between BIGAP/IGAP and VRAM groups in minor complications (57% versus 49%, p = 0.426) or major complications (45% versus 36%, p = 0.351), including major/minor perineal wounds. CONCLUSIONS: Prior studies have shown flap closure is preferable to primary closure after APR and neoadjuvant radiation but lack consensus on which flap offers superior postoperative morbidity. This study comparing outcomes of perineal flap closure showed no significant difference in postoperative complications. Fasciocutaneous flaps are a viable choice for the reconstruction of these challenging defects.

Breast-Q sensory outcomes of non-neurotized, autologous, unilateral breast reconstruction with a minimum of 3-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Sensory reinnervation of autologous breast tissue after free flap reconstruction is highly variable. There is no long-term follow-up data exploring spontaneous reinnervation and how this affects patients' quality of life nor the nerve-related symptoms they experience. To address this issue, we invited patients with a minimum of 3 years after non-neurotized, free flap breast reconstruction to complete patient-reported outcome measures exploring sensation, quality of life and breast-related symptoms. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing unilateral Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominus Muscle (MS-TRAM) or deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction between 01-01-2015 and 31-12-2019 in the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust. We invited participants to complete the recently developed Breast-Q© Breast Sensation Module. RESULTS: All patients had undergone unilateral immediate (n = 85) or delayed (n = 82) breast reconstruction after mastectomy using either a free DIEP (n = 150) or TRAM (n = 17) flap reconstruction a minimum of 3 years prior. The median age at operation was 48. Sensation after reconstruction was significantly reduced in the reconstructed breast compared with the contralateral breast (P < 0.0001) with a reduction in reported quality of life (immediate (68.0 [54.0, 89.0]) and delayed (68.0 [62.0, 83.8])). The sensation was significantly better in immediate vs delayed procedures (P = 0.024). Sensory scores after reconstruction increased with age (P = 0.036). DISCUSSION: Breast sensation after non-neurotized reconstruction with autologous tissue is significantly reduced at long-term follow-up with a reduction in quality of life. A minimum outcome set for quantification of breast sensation is required and future research into the cost-benefit of neurotized, autologous breast reconstruction is needed.

Correlation between abdominal visceral volume measured by a simple procedure and bulging at the abdominal free flap donor site for breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstructions using autologous abdominal tissue result in breasts with a natural shape and consistency. One of the major complications is abdominal bulging. Because of the increased abdominal wall tension, high visceral volume (not visceral fat alone) may increase the occurrence rate of abdominal bulging. A simple procedure involving CT imaging was used to assess this relationship in patients undergoing an abdominal free flap for unilateral breast reconstruction. METHODS: A total of 278 patients were enrolled in this study. The patients' demographics, the thicknesses of visceral volume were compared (Bulging (+) vs. Bulging (-)). Visceral volume was investigated based on the horizontal thickness, which was measured at the thickest part at the level of the umbilical fossa between both sides under the transverse abdominis muscles. RESULTS: Bulging (+) consisted of 39 patients (14.0%), whereas Bulging (-) included 239 patients. Patients with Bulging (+) were significantly older, had higher gestational history rate, and had thin rectus abdominis muscle. In terms of visceral volume, the Bulging (+) group had significantly higher horizontal thicknesses (median 233 mm vs. 219 mm, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed with respect to other factors (age, BMI, history of laparotomy, and operative details). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle, horizontal visceral volume, and gestational history were independently significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Not only the patients with thin rectus abdominis muscle but also patients with a thick horizontal visceral volume may have a higher risk of abdominal bulging.

Norepinephrine preserved flap blood flow compared to phenylephrine in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction surgery: A randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Vasopressors are used in up to 85% of cases during free flap surgery. However, their use is still debated with concerns of vasoconstriction-related complications, with rates up to 53% in minor cases. We investigated the effects of vasopressors on flap blood flow during free flap breast reconstruction surgery. We hypothesized that norepinephrine may preserve flap perfusion better than phenylephrine during free flap transfer. METHODS: A randomized pilot study was performed in patients undergoing free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction. Patients with peripheral artery disease, allergies to study drugs, previous abdominal operations, left ventricular dysfunction, or uncontrolled arrhythmias were excluded. Twenty patients were randomized to receive either norepinephrine (0.03-0.10 µg/kg/min) or phenylephrine (0.42-1.25 µg/kg/min) (each n = 10) to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 65-80 mmHg. The primary outcome was differences in mean blood flow (MBF) and pulsatility index (PI) of flap vessels after anastomosis measured using transit time flowmetry in the two groups. Secondary outcomes included flap loss, necrosis, thrombosis, wound infection, and reoperation within 7 days postoperatively. RESULTS: After anastomosis, MBF showed no significant change in the norepinephrine group (mean difference, -9.4 ± 14.2 mL/min; p = 0.082), whereas it was reduced in the phenylephrine group (-7.9 ± 8.2 mL/min; p = 0.021). PI did not change in either group (0.4 ± 1.0 and 1.3 ± 3.1 in the norepinephrine and phenylephrine groups; p = 0.285 and 0.252, respectively). There were no differences in secondary outcomes between the groups. CONCLUSION: During free TRAM flap breast reconstruction, norepinephrine seems to preserve flap perfusion compared to phenylephrine. However, further validation studies are required.

Analysis of online materials regarding DIEP and TRAM flap autologous breast reconstruction.

Online resources have become a mainstay for health information, and it is vital that such resources maintain accessible literacy levels to empower informed decision making. Previous studies have shown that the online resources regarding post-mastectomy breast reconstruction are of low readability; however, none have evaluated specific online resources regarding the most common procedures within autologous breast reconstruction, limiting analysis to the results of generic searches. This study sought to discover the readability of online, patient-directed resources regarding the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) and Transverse Rectus Abdominis Muscle (TRAM) flaps, the most utilized autologous flaps in breast reconstruction, using health literacy analysis. We hypothesized that the online materials regarding DIEP and TRAM flaps would yield literacy scores above the 6th-grade reading level, as recommended by the American Medical Association, despite previous literature and readability recommendations. Google searches for "DIEP breast reconstruction" and "TRAM breast reconstruction" were conducted. All patient-directed, non-sponsored websites found within the first three pages of the search underwent analysis using a variety of readability formulae. Both DIEP and TRAM resources were well above the 6th-grade reading level according to every metric used, and there was no significant difference in the reading level between the two procedures. Based on these results, significant work was needed to simplify the online resources to be more understandable for patients; these authors propose one method for such. In addition, the low readability of online resources suggests added emphasis on the need for surgeons to ensure that patients understand the medical information discussed during the presurgical consultations.

[Effectiveness of lobulated pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for repairing huge chest wall defect].

Objective: To explore the effectiveness of lobulated pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap to repair huge chest wall defect. Methods: Between June 2021 and June 2022, 14 patients with huge chest wall defects were treated with radical resection of the lesion and lobulated pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap transplantation for reconstruction of chest wall defects. The patients included 5 males and 9 females with an average age of 44.2 years (range, 32-57 years). The size of skin and soft tissue defect ranged from 20 cm×16 cm to 22 cm×22 cm. The bilateral pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps in size of 26 cm×8 cm to 35 cm×14 cm were prepaired and cut into two skin paddles with basically equal area according to the actual defect size of the chest wall. After the lobulated pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap was transferred to the defect, there were two reshaping methods. The first method was that the skin paddle at the lower position and opposite side was unchanged, and the skin paddle at the effected side was rotated by 90° (7 cases). The second method was that the two skin paddles were rotated 90° respectively (7 cases). The donor site was sutured directly. Results: All 14 flaps survived successfully and the wound healed by first intention. The incisions at donor site healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 8.7 months). The appearance and texture of the flaps were satisfactory. Only linear scar was left at the donor site, and the appearance and activity of the abdominal wall were not affected. No local recurrence was found in all tumor patients, and distant metastasis occurred in 2 breast cancer patients (1 liver metastasis and 1 lung metastasis). Conclusion: The lobulated pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in repair of huge chest wall defect can ensure the safety of blood supply of the flap to the greatest extent, ensure the effective and full use of the flap tissue, and reduce postoperative complications.

Novel Port Placement in Robot-Assisted DIEP Flap Harvest Improves Visibility and Bilateral DIEP Access: Early Controlled Cohort Study.

SUMMARY: To minimize donor-site damage, robot-assisted (RA) deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest has been suggested. Current robotic approaches favor port placement, which either does not allow a bilateral DIEP flap harvest through the same ports or necessitates additional scars. In this article, the authors propose a modification of port configuration. In a retrospective controlled cohort study, RA-DIEP and conventional DIEP surgery were compared. The perforator and pedicle were visualized conventionally until the level behind the rectus abdominis muscle. Next, the robotic system was installed to dissect the retromuscular pedicle. The authors assessed patient age; body mass index; history of smoking, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension; and additional surgical time. The length of the anterior rectus sheath (ARS) incision was measured. Pain was quantified using the visual analogue scale. Donor-site complications were assessed. Thirteen RA-DIEP flaps (11 unilateral and two bilateral) and 87 conventional DIEP flaps were harvested without flap loss. The bilateral DIEP flaps were raised without readjustments of the ports. The mean time for pedicle dissection was 53.2 ± 13.4 minutes. The length of the ARS incision was significantly shorter in the RA-DIEP group (2.67 ± 1.13 cm versus 8.14 ± 1.69 cm; 304.87% difference; P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference in postoperative pain (day 1: 1.9 ± 0.9 versus 2.9 ± 1.6, P = 0.094; day 2: 1.8 ± 1.2 versus 2.3 ± 1.5, P = 0.319; day 3: 1.6 ± 0.9 versus 2.0 ± 1.3, P = 0.444). Preliminary results show that the authors' RA-DIEP approach is safe and allows dissection of bilateral RA-DIEP flaps with short ARS incision lengths. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.