ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Period poverty is a significant issue that impacts the physical and psychological well-being of menstruators worldwide which can further contribute to poor mental health outcomes. For menstruators living in refugee camps, access to menstrual hygiene products is often limited or non-existent, leading to increased anxiety, shame, and embarrassment. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of the period poverty and to comprehensively analyze the association between period poverty, reusing menstrual products, and depressive symptoms among menstruators living in refugee camps in Jordan. METHODS: A cross-sectional study surveyed refugee menstruators living in camps in Jordan, aged post-menarche to pre-menopause. Data collection included socio-demographics, menstrual practices, and depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Period poverty was assessed through affordability and frequency of struggles with menstrual products. Chi-squared test, independent sample t-test, One Way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Post hoc, and logistic regression models were used in the analysis. RESULTS: The study included a diverse sample of 386 refugee menstruators living in camps in Jordan (mean age 32.43 ± 9.95, age range 13-55). Period poverty was highly prevalent, with 42.0% reporting monthly struggles to afford menstrual products, and 71.5% reusing menstrual products. Univariate analysis revealed that experiencing period poverty was significantly associated with a younger age of marriage, increased number of children, lower education level, lower mother and father education levels, unemployment, decreased monthly income, absence of health insurance, lower reuse need score, and increased PHQ-9 score (p < 0.05). Menstruators experiencing monthly period poverty were 2.224 times more likely to report moderate to severe depression compared to those without period poverty (95% CI 1.069-4.631, P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: This study highlights a significant association between period poverty and depressive symptoms among refugee menstruators in living in camps in Jordan, as high rates of period poverty were associated with a 2.2-fold increased likelihood of reporting moderate to severe depression. Addressing period poverty in refugee settings is crucial for mitigating depression risks and enhancing overall well-being.
Subject(s)
Depression , Poverty , Refugees , Humans , Female , Jordan/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Refugees/psychology , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Menstruation/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , AdolescentABSTRACT
Introduction: nearly three-quarters of infants younger than six months were not exclusively breastfed globally. Despite some research indicating what factors influence early exclusive breastfeeding interruption in Ethiopia's stable population, there is little evidence indicating what factors influence exclusive breastfeeding interruption in vulnerable populations such as refugee camps. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the factors that contributed to the early termination of exclusive breastfeeding in Ethiopian refugee camps in the Dollo Ado district. Methods: a case-control study was conducted at the Dollo Ado refugee camps from April 05th to 25th, 2017. The eligible 112 cases and 224 controls were identified using the 24-hour recall method. The information was gathered using an interviewer-administered questionnaire that was pretested and organized. Logistic regression analysis was computed to assess the effect of independent variables. Results: the determinants for early interruption of exclusive breastfeeding were not counseled about infant feeding during antenatal care follow-up (adjusted odds ratio (AOR =5.87, 95% CI [2.61-13.1]), not counseled about infant feeding during postnatal care service use (AOR= 4.33, 95% CI [2.71-10.8), breastfeeding problem (AOR= 5.62, 95% CI [4.55-15.2]) and late initiation of breastfeeding (AOR= 4.79, 95% CI [28-10.1]). Conclusion: in this study, early termination of exclusive breastfeeding was caused by breastfeeding problems and late commencement of breastfeeding, as well as not receiving infant feeding advice during antenatal care or postnatal care. The results of this study highlight the significance of concentrating on newborn and young child feeding counseling during prenatal and postnatal care services in order to promote exclusive breastfeeding. In addition, health providers should educate parents on the significance of starting exclusive breastfeeding on time and obtaining help right away if there is a problem, such as breast soreness or the infant refusing to eat due to oral trash, to avoid early exclusive breastfeeding interruption.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Refugee Camps , Weaning , Child , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Black People/statistics & numerical data , Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Case-Control Studies , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Camps of forcibly displaced populations are considered to be at risk of large COVID-19 outbreaks. Low screening rates and limited surveillance led us to conduct a study in Dagahaley camp, located in the Dadaab refugee complex in Kenya to estimate SARS-COV-2 seroprevalence and, mortality and to identify changes in access to care during the pandemic. METHODS: To estimate seroprevalence, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among a sample of individuals (n = 587) seeking care at the two main health centres and among all household members (n = 619) of community health workers and traditional birth attendants working in the camp. A rapid immunologic assay was used (BIOSYNEX® COVID-19 BSS [IgG/IgM]) and adjusted for test performance and mismatch between the sampled population and that of the general camp population. To estimate mortality, all households (n = 12860) were exhaustively interviewed in the camp about deaths occurring from January 2019 through March 2021. RESULTS: In total 1206 participants were included in the seroprevalence study, 8% (95% CI: 6.6%-9.7%) had a positive serologic test. After adjusting for test performance and standardizing on age, a seroprevalence of 5.8% was estimated (95% CI: 1.6%-8.4%). The mortality rate for 10,000 persons per day was 0.05 (95% CI 0.05-0.06) prior to the pandemic and 0.07 (95% CI 0.06-0.08) during the pandemic, representing a significant 42% increase (p<0.001). Médecins Sans Frontières health centre consultations and hospital admissions decreased by 38% and 37% respectively. CONCLUSION: The number of infected people was estimated 67 times higher than the number of reported cases. Participants aged 50 years or more were among the most affected. The mortality survey shows an increase in the mortality rate during the pandemic compared to before the pandemic. A decline in attendance at health facilities was observed and sustained despite the easing of restrictions.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Kenya/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Low adherence to medications, specifically in patients with Diabetes (DM) and Hypertension (HTN), and more so in refugee settings, remains a major challenge to achieving optimum clinical control in these patients. We aimed at determining the self-reported medication adherence prevalence and its predictors and exploring reasons for low adherence among these patients. METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted at Médecins Sans Frontières non-communicable diseases primary care center in the Shatila refugee camp in Beirut, Lebanon in October 2018. Data were collected using the validated Arabic version of the 8-items Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) concurrently followed by in-depth interviews to explore barriers to adherence in patients with DM and/or HTN. Predictors of adherence were separately assessed using logistic regression with SPSS© version 20. Manual thematic content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. RESULTS: Of the 361 patients included completing the MMAS, 70% (n = 251) were moderately to highly adherent (MMAS-8 score = 6 to 8), while 30% (n = 110) were low-adherent (MMAS-8 score<6). Patients with DM-1 were the most likely to be moderately to highly adherent (85%; n = 29). Logistic regression analysis showed that patients with a lower HbA1C were 75% more likely to be moderately to highly adherent [(OR = 0.75 (95%CI 0.63-0.89), p-value 0.001]. Factors influencing self-reported moderate and high adherence were related to the burden of the disease and its treatment, specifically insulin, the self-perception of the disease outcomes and the level of patient's knowledge about the disease and other factors like supportive family and healthcare team. CONCLUSION: Adherence to DM and HTN was good, likely due to a patient-centered approach along with educational interventions. Future studies identifying additional factors and means addressing the barriers to adherence specific to the refugee population are needed to allow reaching optimal levels of adherence and design well-informed intervention programs.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Hypertension/drug therapy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Self Report/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Lebanon/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient-Centered Care/methods , Patient-Centered Care/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Under-five year children are the most vulnerable group affected by malaria, they accounted for 61% of all malaria deaths worldwide. Sherkole refugee camp is stratified under high risk for malaria. Knowledge on malaria prevalence and associated factors among under-five children in Sherkole refugee camp is lacking. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Institution-based cross-sectional survey was conducted among under-five children in Sherkole refugee camp from October to November 2019. Total sample size was 356. Stratified random sampling technique was employed to select the study participants. Standardized questionnaire was used to collect data. Care StartTM Malaria Rapid diagnostic test which detect histidine-rich protein 2 of P. falciparum and plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase of P. vivax was used to diagnose malaria. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to identify factors associated with malaria. RESULTS: A total of 356 participants were included in this study with response rate of 97.5%. The prevalence malaria was 3.9% (95% CI = 2.0-6.2). Outdoor stay at night (AOR = 3.9, 95% CI = 1.14-13.8), stagnant water near to house (AOR = 4.0, 95% CI = 1.14-14.6), and the number of under-five children per household (AOR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.03-13.0) were found to increase the odds of getting malaria. Whereas, insecticide treated net (ITN)utilization (AOR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.06-0.61) and Health information about malaria (AOR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.06-0.65) reduce the odds of getting malaria. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Malaria remains the major public health problem in Sherkole Refugee camp. Outdoor stay at night, stagnant water near to house, and number of under-five children per household were the risk factors for malaria. Health information dissemination that focuses on avoiding outdoor stay at night, eliminating stagnant water & using ITN, and considering number of under-five children per household during ITN distribution should be take into account.
Subject(s)
Malaria/epidemiology , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Following an influx of an estimated 742,000 Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh, Médecins sans Frontières (MSF) established an active indicator-based Community Based Surveillance (CBS) in 13 sub-camps in Cox's Bazar in August 2017. Its objective was to detect epidemic prone diseases early for rapid response. We describe the surveillance, alert and response in place from epidemiological week 20 (12 May 2019) until 44 (2 November 2019). METHODS: Suspected cases were identified through passive health facility surveillance and active indicator-based CBS. CBS-teams conducted active case finding for suspected cases of acute watery diarrhea (AWD), acute jaundice syndrome (AJS), acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), dengue, diphtheria, measles and meningitis. We evaluate the following surveillance system attributes: usefulness, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), timeliness, simplicity, flexibility, acceptability, representativeness and stability. RESULTS: Between epidemiological weeks 20 and 44, an average of 97,340 households were included in the CBS per surveillance cycle. Household coverage reached over 85%. Twenty-one RDT positive cholera cases and two clusters of AWD were identified by the CBS and health facility surveillance that triggered the response mechanism within 12 hours. The PPV of the CBS varied per disease between 41.7%-100%. The CBS required 354 full-time staff in 10 different roles. The CBS was sufficiently flexible to integrate dengue surveillance. The CBS was representative of the population in the catchment area due to its exhaustive character and high household coverage. All households consented to CBS participation, showing acceptability. DISCUSSION: The CBS allowed for timely response but was resource intensive. Disease trends identified by the health facility surveillance and suspected diseases trends identified by CBS were similar, which might indicate limited additional value of the CBS in a dense and stable setting such as Cox's Bazar. Instead, a passive community-event-based surveillance mechanism combined with health facility-based surveillance could be more appropriate.
Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Indicators , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Bangladesh , Dengue/epidemiology , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Humans , Measles/epidemiology , Meningitis/epidemiology , Myanmar , Refugee Camps/standards , Societies, MedicalABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Overweight/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Refugee Camps/organization & administration , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Body Mass Index , Blood Glucose , Glycated Hemoglobin , Glycosuria , KetosisABSTRACT
This paper examines the long-term impact of refugee camps on the health of local residents in Tanzania. Taking height-for-age z-score (HAZ) as a proxy for health, the paper exploits the fact that different birth cohorts were exposed to different stages of the camps' lifecycle. Temporal variation through birth cohorts is combined with geographic variation in a difference-in-difference estimation approach. First, the paper examines the generation that were children at the opening of the camps and are now adults (as of 2012). It finds a negative and localised health effect that has persisted into adulthood. The result is comparable to a 2.9%-5.9% reduction in adult hourly earnings. Second, this paper compares the subsequent generation that was born once the camps were already in operation, and those born after camps closed. It finds no observable difference in the HAZ score between those born during camps operation and in the post-camp period.
Subject(s)
Health Status , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Adverse Childhood Experiences/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Child , Child Health , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Income/statistics & numerical data , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Middle Aged , Tanzania/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
This article presents a case study of research in Dadaab, Kenya to highlight some of the relevant challenges encountered while conducting gender-based violence research in humanitarian settings. A longitudinal mixed-methods design was used to evaluate a comprehensive case-management intervention in the refugee complex near the border of Kenya and Somalia. We present an overview of both expected and unexpected challenges during preparation and implementation of the research, adaptations made to the research design, and lessons learned for future research in similar contexts. Some of the key challenges were attributed to the highly securitized and remote environment of Dadaab refugee camp, like many refugee camp settings, which created limitations for sampling designs, interview locations, and also created particular burdens for the research team members conducting interviews. In addition to the camp environment, the dynamic nature of events and trends in the camp setting created barriers to follow-up with longitudinal cohort participants as well as uncertainty on how to plan for future implementation of research design phases in response to camp changes. Conducting research in humanitarian settings requires a flexible approach to accommodate the challenges that can impact both service delivery and research activities. The discussion presented in this article contributes to the evolving practical guidance on conducting research in humanitarian settings.
Subject(s)
Gender-Based Violence/statistics & numerical data , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Research Design , Altruism , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Kenya/epidemiology , Refugees , Somalia/ethnologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Sexual violence can have a destructive impact on the lives of people. It is more common in unstable conditions such as during displacement or migration of people. On the Greek island of Lesvos, Médecins Sans Frontières provided medical care to survivors of sexual violence among the population of asylum seekers. This study describes the patterns of sexual violence reported by migrants and asylum seekers and the clinical care provided to them. METHODS: This is a descriptive study, using routine program data. The study population consisted of migrants and asylum seekers treated for conditions related to sexual violence at the Médecins Sans Frontières clinic on Lesvos Island (September 2017-January 2018). RESULTS: There were 215 survivors of sexual violence who presented for care, of whom 60 (28%) were male. The majority of incidents reported (94%) were cases of rape; 174 (81%) of survivors were from Africa and 185 (86%) of the incidents occurred over a month before presentation. Half the incidents (118) occurred in transit, mainly in Turkey, and 76 (35%) in the country of origin; 10 cases (5%) occurred on Lesvos. The perpetrator was known to the survivor in 23% of the cases. The need for mental health care exceeded the capacity of available mental care services. CONCLUSION: Even though the majority of cases delayed seeking medical care after the incident, it is crucial that access to mental health services is guaranteed for those in need. Such access and security measures for people in transit need to be put in place along migration routes, including in countries nominally considered safe, and secure routes need to be developed.
Subject(s)
Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Sex Offenses/statistics & numerical data , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Greece , Humans , Male , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Refugees/psychology , Societies, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Transients and Migrants/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the magnitude of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) among ex-Gazan households in Jerash camp in Jordan. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective survey used a systematic sample. METHODS: A systematic sample was used wherein every fifth house in Jerash camp was invited to participate in the study. The camp represents the largest community of ex-Gazan refugees in Jerash camp. Of the 1038 households who were invited, 976 households agreed to participate (response rate = 94%) and filled the pilot-structured questionnaire with information related to their socio-economic characteristics, health status, and their healthcare and total household expenditures. van Doorslaer's method was used to calculate the frequency of CHE, wherein the expenditure on health care was considered catastrophic if it exceeded 10% of a household's total expenditure. RESULTS: Of the sample, 41.8% suffered from CHE. Moreover, we calculated the frequency of CHE using 15%, 20%, 30%, and 40% as threshold values, and the total rates were 14.7, 6.3, 1, and 0.3%, respectively. In addition, the statistical analysis of the results showed higher frequencies of CHE in households with larger number of dependents, those headed by widowed women, and those with history of hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the rate of CHE in Jerash camp is very high and mainly due to the cost of hospitalization. Special attention should be paid for the residents of that area.
Subject(s)
Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Family Characteristics , Female , Health Services , Health Status , Hospitalization , Humans , Jordan , Male , Middle Aged , Middle East , Refugee Camps/economics , Refugees , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultSubject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Refugees , COVID-19 , Canada/epidemiology , Humans , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is an increased flow of refugees into Ethiopia from neighboring countries. However, there are no post-arrival screening mechanisms for hepatitis B and C viruses which could be an additional burden for the local population. Hence, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated risk factors for hepatitis B and C viruses among refugees in Gambella, Ethiopia. It also aimed to determine the knowledge, attitude, and practice concerning hepatitis B and C viruses among participants. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 453 refugees in Gambella, Ethiopia from January until May 2018. A questionnaire was used to collect data on refugees' socio-demographic, risk factors, and KAP of hepatitis B and C infections. Five milliliters of blood sample were collected from each participant and the serum was used for HBsAg and anti-HCV antibody screening rapid tests. Positive samples were further tested by ELISA method. Data were performed using SPSS version 20, and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of HBsAg and anti-HCV among refugees was 7.3% (33/453) and 2.0% (9/453) respectively. Of these, 6.8% (25/370) and 1.4% (5/370) of females were positive for HBsAg and anti-HCV, whereas 9.6% (8/83) and 4.8% (4/83) of males were positive for HBsAg and anti-HCV. The age group of 18-29 and 30-41 years old were related to HCV infection (P = 0.003 and P = 0.020). However, proposed risk factors were not related to HBV and HCV infections. Knowledge assessment showed that 86.5% (392/453) did not know how HBV and HCV infections are transmitted, and 86.8% (393/453) had no information about the availability of HBV vaccine. CONCLUSION: This study showed intermediate prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus in a large refugee camp in Ethiopia. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus was found to increase with age, but no other risk factor for either virus identified as significant. Refugees' understanding of hepatitis B and C was very limited. This indicates the need for screening policy to be implemented and integrated with other health services and awareness creation about the infection in all refugee camps of Gambella.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Female , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis B/etiology , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood , Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis C/etiology , Hepatitis C Antibodies/blood , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diarrhoea is one of the most common causes of mortality and morbidity among populations displaced due to conflict. Handwashing with soap has the potential to halve the burden of diarrhoeal diseases in crisis contexts. This study aimed to identify which determinants drive handwashing behaviour in post-conflict, displacement camps. METHODS: This study was conducted in two camps for internally displaced people in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. A Barrier Analysis questionnaire was used for assessing the determinants of hand washing behaviour. Participants were screened and classified as either 'doers' (those who wash their hands with soap at critical times) or 'non-doers' (those who do not wash their hands with soap at critical times). Forty-five doers and non-doers were randomly selected from each camp and asked about behavioural determinants. The Barrier Analysis standard tabulation sheet was used for the analysis. RESULTS: No differences were observed between doers and non-doers in relation to self-efficacy, action efficacy, the difficulties and benefits of handwashing, and levels of access to soap and water. In the first of the two camps, non-doers found it harder to remember to wash their hands (P = 0.045), had lower perceived vulnerability to diarrhoea (P = 0.037), lower perceived severity of diarrhoea (P = 0.020) and were aware of 'policies' which supported handwashing with soap (P = 0.037). In the second camp non-doers had lower perceived vulnerability to diarrhoea (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: In these camp settings handwashing behaviour, and the factors that determine it, was relatively homogenous because of the homogeneity of the settings and the socio-demographics of population. Handwashing programmes should seek to improve the convenience and quality of handwashing facilities, create cues to trigger handwashing behaviour and increase perceived risk. We identify several ways to improve the validity of the Barrier Analysis method such as using it in combination with other more holistic qualitative tools and revising the statistical analysis.
Subject(s)
Diarrhea/prevention & control , Hand Disinfection , Refugee Camps , Adult , Female , Humans , Iraq , Male , Refugee Camps/organization & administration , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Soaps/supply & distribution , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
The physical, psychological and financial burden of skin disease in low- to middle-income countries, where access to skincare is limited, is poorly understood. A group that we know very little about in this regard are refugees. There are limited data on the range of skin diseases and skincare needs of this group. To better understand the skincare needs of the displaced Rohingya population residing in the Kutupalong refugee camp, Bangladesh, we collected data on demographics, living conditions and range of dermatoses. In the 380 patients assessed, fungal skin infections, predominantly dermatophytes, were by far the most common skin disease seen (n = 215), followed by dermatitis (n = 81). Skin disease can be the presenting feature in many systemic conditions and may cause significant secondary complications itself. Developing a better understanding of the skincare needs of the refugee population is essential for future healthcare planning for this vulnerable group.
Subject(s)
Needs Assessment/economics , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Refugees/psychology , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthrodermataceae/pathogenicity , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Dermatitis/epidemiology , Dermatitis/pathology , Dermatomycoses/epidemiology , Dermatomycoses/microbiology , Dermatomycoses/pathology , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Myanmar/ethnology , Needs Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Skin Diseases/pathology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Background: Hand hygiene in refugee camp settlements remains an important measure against diarrhoeal infections. Refugee settings are characterised by overcrowding and inadequate access to water and hygiene facilities which favour proliferation of faecal-oral diseases. Handwashing with soap and water is therefore an effective way of preventing such diseases. Despite this knowledge, there is limited information about access to functional handwashing facilities in these settings and associated factors in Uganda. Methods: Quantitative data were collected from 312 refugee households in Rhino Camp Settlement, Northwestern Uganda, using a semistructured interviewer-administered questionnaire. A modified Poisson regression was used to obtain prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the determinants of access to a functional handwashing facility among refugee households. All analyses were performed using STATA 14.0 statistical software. Results: Of the 312 households, 123 (39.4%) had access to a handwashing facility, but only 72 (23.1%) of households had handwashing facilities that were functional. Duration of stay in the camp exceeding 3 years (adjusted PR = 2.63; 95% CI (1.73-4.00)) and history of receiving home-based education on hand hygiene (adjusted PR = 9.44; 95% CI (1.40-63.86)) were independent predictors of access to a functional handwashing facility. Conclusion: Access to functional handwashing facilities among the refugee households was low. Our findings highlight the need for more and continued handwashing promotional programs, most especially among newly arrived refugees in the camp.
Subject(s)
Hand Disinfection , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Family Characteristics , Female , Hand Disinfection/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Sanitation/methods , Sanitation/statistics & numerical data , Soaps/supply & distribution , Sudan , Uganda , Young AdultSubject(s)
Communicable Disease Control , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Disaster Planning , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Health Education , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Bangladesh/epidemiology , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Female , Greece/epidemiology , Hand Disinfection , Humans , Myanmar , Organizations/organization & administration , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Refugees/education , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Sanitation , Somalia/epidemiology , Water SupplyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Armed conflict in Africa has led to displacement of over 24.2 million people, more than 1.4 million of whom are living in Uganda. Studies show that refugees living in Ugandan refugee settlements are at increased risk for post-traumatic stress disorder. However data on the prevalence of other mental health problems among refugees including depression, anxiety and substance use disorder among refugees in Uganda is lacking. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder, its main psychiatric comorbidities and perceived psychosocial needs among refugees in Nakivale refugee camp. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of refugee camp residents (n = 387) from nine different countries of origin. Psychiatric disorders were assessed using the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and perceived needs by the Humanitarian Emerging Settings Perceived Needs Scale (HESPER). RESULTS: The prevalence of psychiatric disorders was high among refugees as was the level of perceived needs. The most prevalent psychiatric disorders were generalized anxiety disorders (73%), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (67%), major depressive disorder (58%) and substance use disorders (30%). There was a higher level of comorbidity between PTSD and substance use disorder (OR = 5.13), major depressive disorder (OR = 4.04) and generalized anxiety disorder (OR = 3.27). In multivariate analysis, PTSD was positively associated with the perception of stress as a serious problem (OR = 6.52; P-value = 0.003), safety and protection for women in the community (OR = 2.35; P-value = 0.011), care for family (OR = 2.00; P-value = 0.035) and Place to live in (OR = 1.83; P-value = 0.04). After applying the Bonferroni correction, the perception of stress remained significantly associated with PTSD. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a strong association between PTSD, its main comorbidities and basic needs in Nakivale refugee camps. Mental health support should include psychological interventions as well as social assistance to improve the health of refugees.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Mental Health/standards , Refugees , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Adult , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/classification , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Prevalence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Refugee Camps/statistics & numerical data , Refugees/psychology , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Uganda/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Diabetes is one of the main health problems among Saharawi refugees living in Algerian camps, especially for women. As is known, diet plays an important role in the management of diabetes. However, the dietary habits of Saharawi diabetic women are unknown. Therefore, we investigated the dietary habits and established their relationship with the nutritional status and glycemic profile of such women. We recruited 65 Saharawi type II diabetic women taking orally glucose-lowering drugs only. Dietary habits were investigated using qualitative 24 h recall carried out over three non-consecutive days. Anthropometric measurements were taken and blood parameters were measured. About 80% of the women were overweight and about three out of four women had uncompensated diabetes and were insulin resistant. The Saharawi diet was found to mainly include cereals, oils, sugars, vegetables (especially onions, tomatoes, and carrots), tea, and meat. Principal component analysis identified two major dietary patterns, the first one "healthy" and the second one "unhealthy". Women in the higher tertile of adherence to the unhealthy dietary pattern had a higher homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA) index (b = 2.49; 95% CI: 0.41-4.57; p = 0.02) and circulating insulin (b = 4.52; 95% CI: 0.44-8.60; p = 0.03) than the women in the lowest tertile. Food policies should be oriented to improve the quality of diet of Saharawi diabetic women.