Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a biomarker to monitor renal function in patients with obstructive ureteral calculi.

PURPOSE: Our study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as an effective real-time monitoring biomarker of renal function in patients with obstructive ureteral calculi presenting renal colic. METHODS: A cohort of 89 first-visit patients with renal colic caused by unilateral ureteral calculi were retrospectively reviewed. 46 of which received double-J ureteral stent placement (group 1) and the remaining 43 treated conservatively with analgesics and hydration (group 2) when diagnosed. Urinary NGAL (uNGAL) values in the baseline, 2 h and 1 day after treatments were recorded. The variation of this parameter over time and the association with patients' characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: uNGAL levels decreased as time went by for patients receiving double-J ureteral stent placement (47.23 ± 28.32 ng/mL for baseline, 40.73 ± 21.86 ng/mL for 2 h and 34.67 ± 18.00 ng/mL for 1 day after operation; p = 0.0363). Nevertheless, for those treating conservatively, the levels emerged a mild increase (50.63 ± 32.30 ng/mL, 56.00 ± 32.01 ng/mL and 60.63 ± 34.08 ng/mL, correspondingly; p = 0.3708). By analyzing the association between uNGAL variation and patients' characteristics of group 1, operation duration showed the best correlation coefficient (Pearson r = 0.6106, r2 = 0.3728, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: uNGAL can be used as a biomarker to monitor the renal function effectively when serum creatinine (sCr) was within normal limits. And double-J ureteral stent can be considered as a protective factor to renal function in patients with obstructive ureteral calculi presenting renal colic.

Contrast-enhanced or noncontrast CT for renal colic: utilizing urinalysis and patient history of urolithiasis to decide.

PURPOSE: In the emergency setting, flank pain commonly leads to a noncontrast CT despite a significant percentage of patients having alternative diagnoses, often difficult to characterize without contrast. We investigated the combined utility of urinalysis and history of urolithiasis in identifying patients who are unlikely to have urolithiasis and may benefit from a contrast-enhanced study. METHODS: Retrospective review of 350 patients from May 2013 to May 2016 was performed for patients in the emergency department with renal colic that underwent noncontrast CT and urinalysis testing. RESULTS: Urolithiasis was present in 282 of the 350 patients reviewed (81%), of which 175 (62%) had an obstructing calculus. RBC-positive urinalysis was present in 231 patients with calculi on CT (sensitivity 82%). Patient history of urolithiasis plus urinalysis had a sensitivity of 94% for detecting calculi. Thirty-five patients (10%) had alternative diagnoses, 33 of which were in patients without obstructing calculi. Sixty-seven patients underwent noncontrast CT despite no history of urolithiasis and a negative urinalysis, 10 of which (15%) had alternative diagnoses. Only three cases in this subset (4%) had nonobstructing 1-2-mm calculi, potentially missed with contrast. In this subset, the projected proportion of optimally characterized cases with intravenous contrast is 96%, compared to 85% without contrast (p = .03). DISCUSSION: Given the high combined sensitivity of urinalysis and patient history (94%), this simple analysis can confidently direct clinicians to a contrast-enhanced CT in "rule-out" cases of flank pain in patients with a negative history and negative urinalysis, particularly given that 15% of these patients had alternative diagnoses.

Pyuria and Urine Cultures in Patients with Acute Renal Colic.

BACKGROUND: Renal colic caused by stone(s) is common in the emergency department. Often, urinalysis reveals white blood cells, but it is unknown how frequently pyuria is sterile or infectious. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the incidence of pyuria in patients with renal colic and to correlate the incidence with a positive urine culture. METHODS: A 1-year retrospective review of adult patients with renal colic presenting to three community emergency departments was performed. Patients without confirmed renal stone(s) or completed urinalysis were excluded. Hematuria is defined as ≥5 red blood cells per high power field (RBC/HPF) and pyuria as >10 white blood cells per high power field (WBC/HPF). A positive urine culture is defined as >100,000 colony forming units per milliliter. Student's t-test, chi square, or Fisher's exact tests were performed as appropriate, with significance set at 0.05. RESULTS: There were 339 patients who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 14.2% of these patients had associated pyuria. There were 153 (45.1%) urine cultures performed, and 16 (10.5%) were positive. Patients with pyuria were more likely to have a positive urine culture (36.4% vs. 3.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). The percentage of positive urine cultures increased (p < 0.001) with increasing pyuria from 9.1% (10-20 WBC/HPF) to 60.0% (>50 WBC/HPF). Positive cultures also increased (p < 0.001) with increased leukocyte esterase observed on macroscopic samples, from 1.6% (small or less leukocyte esterase) to 77.8% (large-volume leukocyte esterase). CONCLUSION: Pyuria was found in 14.2% of patients with renal colic. Patients with pyuria had 36.4% positive cultures compared to 3.3% of patients without pyuria. The degree of pyuria or leukocyte esterase was significantly associated with the risk of a positive culture. Urine cultures are recommended for all patients with renal colic and pyuria.

Spot urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid is not an ideal diagnostic test for acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: There is growing evidence to suggest the use of urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) test to help with the diagnosis of appendicitis. The aim of our study was to establish whether urinary 5-HIAA could be used as an effective diagnostic test for acute appendicitis. DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective double-blinded study was carried out from December 2014 to October 2015. Patients admitted to the emergency surgical ward of a teaching hospital with suspected appendicitis were included in the study. The diagnostic accuracy of the test was measured by receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were divided into 2 groups: acute appendicitis (n=38) and other diagnosis (n=59). The median value of urinary 5-HIAA was 24.19µmol/L (range, 5.39-138.27) for acute appendicitis vs 18.87µmol/L (range, 2.27-120.59) for other diagnosis group (P=.038). The sensitivity and specificity of urinary 5-HIAA at a cutoff value of 19µmol/L were 71% and 50%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under curve was 0.64 (confidence interval [CI], 0.513-0.737) for urinary 5-HIAA, which was lower than white blood cell count (0.69; CI, 0.574-0.797), neutrophil count (0.68; CI, 0.565-0.792), and C-reactive protein (0.76; CI, 0.657-0.857). There was no significant difference in the median values of 5-HIAA between different grades of severity of appendicitis (P=.704). CONCLUSION: Urinary 5-HIAA is not an ideal test for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Value of Color Doppler ultrasound, kub and urinalysis in diagnosis of renal colic due to ureteral stones.

PURPOSE: Despite the routine use of helical CT in diagnosis of renal colic, there are recent concerns regarding the radiation exposure, overuse and costs. We attempted in this retrospective study to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound (gray-scale and color Doppler with twinkling), KUB and urinalysis in diagnosis of renal colic due to ureteral calculi presented in Emergency Room. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 939 consecutive cases of renal colic presented to ER have been managed and evaluated by ureteral ultrasound, KUB and urinalysis for the presence of ureteral stones. Non-confirmatory cases were subjected to Helical CT examination. RESULTS: Renal and ureteral ultrasound (gray-scale) alone detected ureteral calculi in 615 cases (65.4%) and after utilizing Color Doppler Ultrasound with twinkling the diagnosis was made with confidence in 935 cases (99.6%) but 4 (0.4%). KUB showed radiopaque stones in 503 (53.6%) patients and no stones were detected in 436 (46.4%). Microhematuria presented in 835 (88.9%) cases while absent in 102 (10.9%). There were 190 (20.3%), 77 (8.2%) and 671 (71.5%) patients with upper, middle and lower ureteral stones respectively. The simultaneous positive findings in US and KUB with microhematuria were found only in 453 (48.2%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Color Doppler ultrasound with twinkling increased the detection rate of ureteral stones in acute renal colic patients presented to ER with less radiation exposure. Ultrasound examination as a single modality is superior to KUB and urinalysis in initial diagnosis of renal colic.

Value of color doppler ultrasound, kub and urinalysis in diagnosis of renal colic due to ureteral stones

Purpose Despite the routine use of helical CT in diagnosis of renal colic, there are recent concerns regarding the radiation exposure, overuse and costs. We attempted in this retrospective study to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound (gray-scale and color Doppler with twinkling), KUB and urinalysis in diagnosis of renal colic due to ureteral calculi presented in Emergency Room. Materials and Methods A total of 939 consecutive cases of renal colic presented to ER have been managed and evaluated by ureteral ultrasound, KUB and urinalysis for the presence of ureteral stones. Non-confirmatory cases were subjected to Helical CT examination. Results Renal and ureteral ultrasound (gray-scale) alone detected ureteral calculi in 615 cases (65.4%) and after utilizing Color Doppler Ultrasound with twinkling the diagnosis was made with confidence in 935 cases (99.6%) but 4 (0.4%). KUB showed radiopaque stones in 503 (53.6%) patients and no stones were detected in 436 (46.4%). Microhematuria presented in 835 (88.9%) cases while absent in 102 (10.9%). There were 190 (20.3%), 77 (8.2%) and 671 (71.5%) patients with upper, middle and lower ureteral stones respectively. The simultaneous positive findings in US and KUB with microhematuria were found only in 453 (48.2%) cases. Conclusions The use of Color Doppler ultrasound with twinkling increased the detection rate of ureteral stones in acute renal colic patients presented to ER with less radiation exposure. Ultrasound examination as a single modality is superior to KUB and urinalysis in initial diagnosis of renal colic. .

Enfrentamiento del cólico renal en urgencia / Confrontation of renal colic in urgency

Ureteral colic as a nosologic entity, is part of a select group of pathologies that present themselves in an intense and acute form, in which the patient suffers excruciating pain and demands quick diagnosis and treatment. It’s also a common disease in our emergency service, like in other countries. The aim of the present study is to standardize and deepen the management and treatment of ureteral colic, from the perspective of the emergency medicine...

[Influence of "Sancai" acupuncture treatment on plasma and urine SP, 5-HT levels of renal colic patients].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of "Sancai Needling" (superficial, medium and deep insertion of the acupuncture needle) combined with electroacupuncture ( EA) stimulation of Shenshu ( BL 23) on plasma and urine SP and 5- HT levels in renal colic patients, so as to study its mechanism underlying improvement of renal colic. METHODS: Sixty renal colic patients (lower-energizer stasis type) were randomly allocated to "Sancai Needling" -EA group, Ashi-point-EA group and routine EA treatment group, with 20 cases in each group. The "Sancai Needling"-EA meant that an acupuncture needle was inserted into the subcutaneous layer of BL 23 first and EA stimulation was given for 10 min; then the needle was inserted into the medium layer (muscle layer) and EA stimulation performed for 10 min; at last, the needle was further inserted into the periosteum-muscle layer and EA was performed for 10 min again. The procedures for Ashi-point-EA group were the same. For patients of the routine EA treatment group, EA was applied to BL 23 for 30 min. The therapeutic effect for pain was assessed according to McGill Pain Questionnaire. Plasma and urine SP and 5-HT contents were determined using enzyme-labeled immunosorbent assay (ELISA) . RESULTS: In comparison with pre-treatment, pain scores, plasma and urine SP and 5-HT contents were remarkably decreased in renal colic patients of the "Sancai Needling"-EA group, Ashi-point-EA group and routine EA treatment group after the treatment ( P<0. 05). The effects of the "Sancai Needling"-EA group and Ashi-point-EA group were significantly superior to those of the routine EA treatment group in reducing pain score, plasma and urine SP and 5-HT contents( P<0. 05). No statistical differences were found between the "Sancai Needling"-EA group and Ashi-point-EA group in pain score, plasma and urine SP and 5-HT contents ( P>0. 05). CONCLUSION: "Sancai Needling"-EA treatment is effective in relieving renal colic in the patients, which may be closely associated with its effects in down-regulating plasma SP and 5-HT levels.

[The role of hypomagnesiuria in urolithiasis and renal colic: results from a prospective study of a metabolic evaluation protocola]. / Ruolo dell'ipomagnesuria nella colica renale da urolitiasi: risultati di uno studio prospettico sull'impiego di un protocollo di valutazione metabolica.

AIM: The stone disease of the urinary tract (urolithiasis) is a growing disease. The identification of metabolic disorders, treatable with prophylactic therapy, appears to be clinically important. The aim of this study was the analysis of metabolic disorders that promote and support the urolithiasis in a cohort of patients with renal colic at an Emergency Department. METHODS: In this prospective case series, we enrolled consecutive patients with renal colic treated at an Emergency Department within a Regional Teaching Hospital. We implemented a structured metabolic evaluation, which included blood chemistry studies, stone analysis and a 24-hour urine collection. We then evaluated the frequency of metabolic abnormalities alone or in combination. RESULTS: We enrolled 39 patients whit renal colic and a diagnosis of urolithiasis: 21 (54%) were males and the median age was 43.6 years (range 20-70). The most frequently observed type of stone was that of calcium oxalate (74%). Hypomagnesiuria was the most common metabolic abnormality found at the 24-hour urine collection (22/39, 56%), followed by hypocalciuria (31%), hypernatruria (20%), hyperuricuria (18%) and hyperoxaluria (15%). Among the associations of metabolic abnormalities, the hypocalciuria /hypomagnesuria was that observed with higher frequency (23%). CONCLUSION: We report an incidence of hypomagnesiuria (60%) in patients with renal colic higher than has ever been described in the literature. This result could be of importance in the knowledge of the pathogenesis of the urolithiasis and could have interesting implications in clinical practice.

Beware the low urine pH--the major cause of the increased prevalence of nephrolithiasis in the patient with type 2 diabetes.

There is an increased prevalence of nephrolithiasis and an increase in the incidence of renal colic in patients with diabetes, obesity, hypertension and insulin resistance because of an increased frequency of uric acid crystallization. Uric acid crystallization occurs in the milieu of an acid urine and is not due to hyperuricosuria as with insulin resistance, urinary uric acid levels are generally decreased because of increased renal tubular reabsorption. However, in the presence of insulin resistance, there is decreased renal tubular generation of ammonia and increased sodium absorption leading to acidification of the urine and uric acid crystallization. The presence of a low urine pH should alert the clinician to the increased risk of nephrolithiasis particularly in the obese, diabetic or hypertensive patient. Prevention of nephrolithiasis can be achieved in susceptible individuals either by alkalizing the urine and/or by further decreasing the uric acid content of the urine with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor such as allopurinol.