Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 68
Filter
3.
Drug Alcohol Rev ; 39(5): 484-494, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32657495

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Guided by cognitive theory of loneliness, this study sought to explore the experience of loneliness among people accessing treatment for substance use disorders. Specifically, contributors to, consequences and alleviators of loneliness were explored. DESIGN AND METHODS: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants. Interviews were conducted onsite at two residential treatment facilities in New South Wales, Australia. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed and an iterative categorisation approach was used to guide data analysis and reporting. RESULTS: Four key themes emerged as contributors to and consequences of loneliness: cognitions (mistrust, perceived support from others, low self-worth and fear of negative evaluation), quality and authenticity of relationships, unhelpful interpersonal behaviours and the role of substance use. Participants indicated that overcoming the cognitive and behavioural perpetuators helped to alleviate loneliness and also described the utility of support groups, pursuit of authentic relationships and activities that provide a sense of purpose as helpful. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Cognitions related to mistrust, lack of perceived support, low self-worth, fear of negative evaluation and identification and pursuit of meaningful relationships supportive of recovery should be key treatment targets for this population.


Subject(s)
Interview, Psychological/methods , Loneliness/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Perception/physiology , Residential Treatment/trends , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Adult , Cognition/physiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Middle Aged , New South Wales/epidemiology , Social Isolation/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Trust/psychology , Young Adult
4.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 212: 108067, 2020 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32445926

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study examines whether MOUD increases treatment completion and retention in both short-term (ST) and long-term (LT) residential programs using a national dataset. METHODS: Data were extracted from the 2015-2017 TEDS-D (Treatment Episode Dataset-Discharge) datasets for opioid using adults in ST (n = 87,296) and LT (n = 66,623) residential treatment. Primary outcome variables were treatment completion and retention (ST: length of stay >10 days; LT: >90 days). Logistic regression estimated the effects of MOUD on the probability of treatment completion and retention separately for ST and LT residential treatment, controlling for individual background characteristics. RESULTS: Only 18% of clients in residential treatment programs had MOUD in their treatment plans. For ST residential treatment, MOUD was associated with a 40% increased likelihood of treatment completion (OR = 1.404) and 34% increased retention (OR = 1.337). For LT residential treatment, MOUD was associated with a 26% reduced likelihood of treatment completion (OR = 0.743) and no significant increase in retention. Post hoc analysis suggests insurance coverage may be influencing outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite MOUD being a standard of care for OUD, MOUD is particularly under-utilized in residential treatment. Further research should focus on how best to integrate MOUD within short-term residential treatment and to explore the potential viability of MOUD in long-term residential programs. Given the risk of overdose following residential treatment, for at least short-term residential programs, this setting may be advantageous for integrating psychosocial treatments with early MOUD engagement in a structured therapeutic environment as part of a long-term continuum of care recovery program.


Subject(s)
Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/psychology , Residential Treatment/trends , Retention in Care/trends , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Residential Treatment/methods , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/methods , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
5.
Psychiatry Res ; 284: 112778, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32004894

ABSTRACT

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) lead to devastating long-term health consequences that are associated with a dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Children and adolescents living in institutional care have an increased risk to experience ACEs, particularly linked to missing continuity of care, and a higher risk for consequences of ACEs such as mental disorders. In order to improve the overall quality of care, it is important to better understand the stress-physiology of this high-risk sample and to identify specific stressors linked to adverse outcomes. Therefore, we assessed ACEs due to missing continuity of care and their association with hair cortisol and DHEA levels in children, adolescents and young adults in institutional care. Results show that ACEs resulting from the family of origin, in detail maternal mental illness, and ACEs due to out-of-home placement, namely frequent change of caregivers, are associated with HPA axis over-activation. HPA axis activation is associated with enhanced mental health problems. These results point towards an association between continuity of care and the stress system of children and adolescents in this high-risk sample. Care concepts that focus on continuity of care might help to reduce these physiological alterations and devastating long-term consequences following ACEs.


Subject(s)
Adverse Childhood Experiences/trends , Family Relations/psychology , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System/metabolism , Mental Disorders/psychology , Pituitary-Adrenal System/metabolism , Residential Treatment/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Hydrocortisone/blood , Male , Mental Disorders/blood , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Health/trends , Pilot Projects , Risk Factors , Young Adult
6.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 201: 227-235, 2019 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31254749

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Residential treatment is a standard treatment for individuals with severe and complex substance use problems. However, there is limited evidence on best practice approaches to treatment in these settings. This review provides a comprehensive update on the evidence base for residential treatment, and directions for future research and clinical practice. METHOD: A systematic review of all studies published between January 2013 and December 2018 was conducted. Public health and psychology databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycARTICLES and PsycINFO) were systematically searched, and forward and backward snowballing were used to identify additional studies. Studies were included if they were quantitative, assessed the effectiveness of residential substance treatment programs for adults, were published in the English language and in peer-reviewed journals. The Effective Public Health Practice Project's Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to assess methodological quality. RESULTS: Our search identified 23 studies. Eight were rated as methodologically strong, five as moderate and ten rated as weak. Quality ratings were impacted by attrition at follow-up and research design. Despite limitations, results provide moderate quality evidence for the effectiveness of residential treatment in improving outcomes across a number of substance use and life domains. CONCLUSION: With caution, results suggest that best practice rehabilitation treatment integrates mental health treatment and provides continuity of care post-discharge. Future research and practice should focus on better collection of outcome data and conducting data linkage of key health, welfare and justice agency administrative data to enhance understanding of risk and recovery trajectories.


Subject(s)
Residential Treatment/methods , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/methods , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Residential Treatment/trends , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/trends , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Treatment Outcome
7.
BMC Psychiatry ; 19(1): 55, 2019 02 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30717713

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinically operated community-based residential rehabilitation units (Community Rehabilitation Units) are resource intensive services supporting a small proportion of the people with severe and persisting mental illness who experience difficulties living in the community. Most consumers who engage with these services will be diagnosed with schizophrenia or a related disorder. This review seeks to: generate a typology of service models, describe the characteristics of the consumers accessing these services, and synthesise available evidence about consumers' service experiences and outcomes. METHOD: A systematic review was undertaken to identify studies describing Community Rehabilitation Units in Australia, consumer characteristics, and evidence about consumer experiences and outcomes. Search strings were applied to multiple databases; additional records were identified through snowballing. Records presenting unique empirical research were subject to quality appraisal. RESULTS: The typology defined two service types, Community-Based Residential Care (C-BRC), which emerged in the context of de-institutionalisation, and the more recent Transitional Residential Rehabilitation (TRR) approach. Key differentiating features were the focus on transitional care and 'recovery' under TRR. Schizophrenia spectrum disorders were the most common primary diagnosis under both service types. TRR consumers were more likely to be male, referred from community settings, and less likely to be subject to involuntary treatment. Regarding outcomes, the limited quantitative evidence (4 records, 2 poor quality) indicated C-BRC was successful in supporting the majority of consumers transferred from long-term inpatient care to remain out of hospital. All qualitative research conducted in C-BRC settings was assessed to be of poor quality (3 records). No methodologically sound quantitative evidence on the outcomes of TRR was identified. Qualitative research undertaken in these settings was of mixed quality (9 records), and the four records exploring consumer perspectives identified them as valuing the service provided. CONCLUSIONS: While there is qualitative evidence to suggest consumers value the support provided by Community Rehabilitation Units, there is an absence of methodologically sound quantitative research about the consumer outcomes achieved by these services. Given the ongoing and increasing investment in these facilities within the Australian context, there is an urgent need for high-quality research examining their efficiency and effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ( CRD42018097326 ).


Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services/methods , Mental Disorders/therapy , Psychiatric Rehabilitation/methods , Residential Treatment/methods , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , Community Mental Health Services/trends , Humans , Inpatients/psychology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Psychiatric Rehabilitation/trends , Residential Treatment/trends
8.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 236(2): 709-721, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30415277

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Attentional bias toward drug-related stimuli is a feature of drug addiction that is linked to craving and drug-seeking behavior. OBJECTIVES/METHOD: An attentional bias modification (ABM) program was tested in 42 methamphetamine-dependent clients (DSM-IV criteria) receiving residential treatment for their drug use. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups (N = 21 each), receiving 12 sessions of either computerized ABM training (designed to train attention away from methamphetamine stimuli 100% of the time) or an attentional control condition (designed to train attention away from methamphetamine stimuli 50% of the time). Outcome measures included attentional bias to methamphetamine-related stimuli on a probe detection task, self-reported craving, and preferences to view methamphetamine-related images on a Simulated Drug Choice Task. A subset of participants (N = 17) also underwent fMRI in a cue-induced craving paradigm. RESULTS: Poor split-half reliability was observed for the probe detection task. Using this task, attentional bias toward methamphetamine-related stimuli was greater after training than at baseline, irrespective of group (p = 0.037). Spontaneous and cue-induced methamphetamine craving diminished with time (ps < 0.01), but ABM training did not influence these effects (group by time interactions, ps > 0.05). ABM training did not influence selection of methamphetamine-related pictures in the Simulated Drug Choice task (p > 0.05). In the fMRI assessment, cue-induced activation in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex was reduced over time, without an effect of ABM training. CONCLUSIONS: ABM training did not improve several clinically relevant variables in treatment-seeking methamphetamine users. Additional research is needed to improve the measurement of attentional bias.


Subject(s)
Amphetamine-Related Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Amphetamine-Related Disorders/psychology , Attentional Bias/physiology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Methamphetamine/adverse effects , Residential Treatment/trends , Adult , Attentional Bias/drug effects , Craving/drug effects , Craving/physiology , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/trends , Male , Photic Stimulation/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Residential Treatment/methods , Self Report
9.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs ; 79(6): 909-917, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30573022

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Despite evidence of effectiveness, pharmacotherapy-methadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone-is prescribed to less than 35% of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD). Among veterans whose OUD treatment is provided in VHA residential programs, factors influencing pharmacotherapy implementation are unknown. We examined barriers to and facilitators of pharmacotherapy for OUD among patients diagnosed with OUD in VHA residential programs to inform the development of implementation strategies to improve medication receipt. METHOD: VHA electronic health records and program survey data were used to describe pharmacotherapy provided to a national cohort of VHA patients with OUD in residential treatment programs (N = 4,323, 6% female). Staff members (N = 63, 57% women) from 44 residential programs (response rate = 32%) participated in interviews. Barriers to and facilitators of pharmacotherapy for OUD were identified from transcripts using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Across all 97 residential treatment programs, the average rate of pharmacotherapy for OUD was 21% (range: 0%-67%). Reported barriers included provider or program philosophy against pharmacotherapy, a lack of care coordination with nonresidential treatment settings, and provider perceptions of low patient interest or need. Facilitators included having a prescriber on staff, education and training for patients and staff, and support from leadership. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypothesis, barriers to and facilitators of pharmacotherapy for OUD in VHA residential treatment programs were consistent with prior research in outpatient settings. Intensive educational programs, such as academic detailing, and policy changes such as mandating buprenorphine waiver training for VHA providers, may help improve receipt of pharmacotherapy for OUD.


Subject(s)
Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Hospitals, Veterans , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Residential Treatment/methods , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veterans , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospitals, Veterans/trends , Humans , Male , Methadone/therapeutic use , Naltrexone/therapeutic use , Opioid-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Residential Treatment/trends , United States/epidemiology , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/trends , Veterans/psychology
10.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 190: 170-178, 2018 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30041092

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The present study examined racial/ethnic disparities in initial treatment episode completion for adult clients reporting opioids as their primary problem substance in large US metropolitan areas. METHODS: Data were extracted from the 2013 TEDS-D dataset (Treatment Episode Dataset-Discharge) for the 42 largest US metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). Fixed effects logistic regression controlling for MSA was used to estimate the effect of race/ethnicity on the likelihood of treatment completion. The model was repeated for each individual MSA in a stratified design to compare the geographic variation in racial/ethnic disparities, controlling for gender, age, education, employment, living arrangement, treatment setting, medication-assisted treatment, referral source, route of administration, and number of substances used at admission. RESULTS: Only 28% of clients completed treatment, and the results from the fixed effects model indicate that blacks and Hispanics are less likely to complete treatment compared to whites. However, the stratified analysis of individual MSAs found only three of the 42 MSAs had racial/ethnic disparities in treatment completion, with the New York City (NYC) MSA largely responsible for the disparities in the combined sample. Supplementary analyses suggest that there are greater differences between whites and minority clients in the NYC MSA vs. other cities on characteristics associated with treatment completion (e.g., residential treatment setting). CONCLUSION: This study underscores the need for improving treatment retention for all opioid using clients in large metropolitan areas in the US, particularly for minority clients in those localities where disparities exist, and for better understanding the geographic context for treatment outcomes.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Opioid-Related Disorders/ethnology , Opioid-Related Disorders/therapy , Urban Population/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual/trends , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Opioid-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Racial Groups/ethnology , Residential Treatment/trends , Treatment Outcome , United States/ethnology , Young Adult
11.
Psychiatr Serv ; 69(7): 804-811, 2018 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29695226

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether having co-occurring substance use and mental disorders influenced treatment engagement or continuity of care and whether offering financial incentives, client-specific electronic reminders, or a combination to treatment agencies improved treatment engagement and continuity of care among clients with co-occurring disorders. METHODS: The study used a randomized cluster design to assign agencies (N=196) providing publicly funded substance use disorder treatment in Washington State to a research arm: incentives only, reminders only, incentives and reminders, and a control condition. Data were analyzed for 76,044 outpatient, 32,797 residential, and 39,006 detoxification admissions from Washington's treatment data system. Multilevel logistic regressions were conducted, with clients nested within agencies, to examine the effect of the interventions on treatment engagement and continuity of care. RESULTS: Compared with clients with a substance use disorder only, clients with co-occurring disorders were less likely to engage in outpatient treatment or have continuity of care after discharge from residential treatment, but they were more likely to have continuity of care after discharge from detoxification. The interventions did not influence treatment engagement or continuity of care, except the reminders had a positive impact on continuity of care after residential treatment among clients with co-occurring disorders. CONCLUSIONS: In general, the interventions did not result in improved treatment engagement or continuity of care. The limited number of significant results supporting the influence of incentives and alerts on treatment engagement and continuity of care add to the mixed findings reported by previous research. Multiple interventions may be needed for performance improvement.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/trends , Motivation , Patient Discharge/trends , Residential Treatment/trends , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Behavior Therapy/economics , Behavior Therapy/trends , Continuity of Patient Care/economics , Female , Health Systems Agencies/trends , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge/economics , Residential Treatment/economics , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers , Substance-Related Disorders/economics , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Washington , Young Adult
12.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 183: 192-200, 2018 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29288914

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of continuity of care after detoxification and residential treatment, many clients do not receive further treatment services after discharged. This study examined whether offering financial incentives and providing client-specific electronic reminders to treatment agencies lead to improved continuity of care after detoxification or residential treatment. METHODS: Residential (N = 33) and detoxification agencies (N = 12) receiving public funding in Washington State were randomized into receiving one, both, or none (control group) of the interventions. Agencies assigned to incentives arms could earn financial rewards based on their continuity of care rates relative to a benchmark or based on improvement. Agencies assigned to electronic reminders arms received weekly information on recently discharged clients who had not yet received follow-up treatment. Difference-in-difference regressions controlling for client and agency characteristics tested the effectiveness of these interventions on continuity of care. RESULTS: During the intervention period, 24,347 clients received detoxification services and 20,685 received residential treatment. Overall, neither financial incentives nor electronic reminders had an effect on the likelihood of continuity of care. The interventions did have an effect among residential treatment agencies which had higher continuity of care rates at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of agency-level financial incentives and electronic reminders did not result in improvements in continuity of care, except among higher performing agencies. Alternative strategies at the facility and systems levels should be explored to identify ways to increase continuity of care rates in specialty settings, especially for low performing agencies.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/trends , Motivation , Patient Discharge/trends , Residential Treatment/trends , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Therapy, Computer-Assisted/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Behavior Therapy/economics , Behavior Therapy/trends , Continuity of Patient Care/economics , Female , Health Systems Agencies/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge/economics , Random Allocation , Residential Treatment/economics , Reward , Substance-Related Disorders/economics , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Therapy, Computer-Assisted/economics , Washington/epidemiology , Young Adult
13.
Cien Saude Colet ; 22(5): 1455-1466, 2017 May.
Article in Portuguese, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28538917

ABSTRACT

Brazilian public policy on drugs has been permeated by two diametrically opposing approaches: one focusing on prohibition and the other on non- prohibition. Similarly, there have been two opposing approaches to mental healthcare, one centered on hospitalization and the other psychosocial care and development. In the context of these different paradigms, this article presents an analysis of twenty-two documents sourced by the legislative rules over the last sixteen years. After the year 2000, a renewed focus by healthcare community on drugs was noticeable as was the immersion of a harm reducing approach. Following international trends, although there are still considerable divergencies between (a) psychosocial care and(b) residential care in the therapeutic communities there seems to be an alignment to anti- prohibition approaches.


Subject(s)
Health Policy , Legislation, Drug/trends , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Brazil , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Hospitalization , Humans , Mental Health Services/trends , Public Policy , Residential Treatment/organization & administration , Residential Treatment/trends , Therapeutic Community
14.
Ciênc. Saúde Colet. (Impr.) ; 22(5): 1455-1466, maio 2017. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-839968

ABSTRACT

Resumo Tensões em diferentes campos perpassam a formulação de políticas públicas sobre drogas. Na Justiça/Segurança pública, controvérsias entre os paradigmas do proibicionismo e antiproibicionismo; no campo da Saúde/Assistência social, os paradigmas asilar e psicossocial norteiam, de forma divergente, práticas em saúde mental/álcool e outras drogas. O objetivo do artigo é analisar, à luz destes paradigmas, modelos que influenciaram as Políticas Públicas sobre Drogas no Executivo Federal brasileiro. Trata-se de pesquisa documental, cuja fonte são normativos publicados entre 2000-2016 e categorias analíticas: os modelos hegemônicos, as influências na organização dos serviços e a intersetorialidade. Foram analisados 22 documentos. Concluiu-se que, na saúde, a abordagem às drogas apresentou incremento e relevância a partir dos anos 2000, a redução de danos emergiu como estratégia norteadora do cuidado, um paradigma ético, clínico e político, transversal no diálogo com os campos. Identificou-se protagonismo promissor de outros setores, alinhados às novas tendências internacionais e ao antiproibicionismo, mas persistem divergências quanto ao modelo de atenção psicossocial e internação em comunidades terapêuticas.


Abstract Brazilian public policy on drugs has been permeated by two diametrically opposing approaches: one focusing on prohibition and the other on non- prohibition. Similarly, there have been two opposing approaches to mental healthcare, one centered on hospitalization and the other psychosocial care and development. In the context of these different paradigms, this article presents an analysis of twenty-two documents sourced by the legislative rules over the last sixteen years. After the year 2000, a renewed focus by healthcare community on drugs was noticeable as was the immersion of a harm reducing approach. Following international trends, although there are still considerable divergencies between (a) psychosocial care and(b) residential care in the therapeutic communities there seems to be an alignment to anti- prohibition approaches.


Subject(s)
Humans , Health Policy , Legislation, Drug/trends , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Public Policy , Residential Treatment/organization & administration , Residential Treatment/trends , Therapeutic Community , Brazil , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Hospitalization , Mental Health Services/trends
15.
Soc Work Health Care ; 56(3): 169-188, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28118099

ABSTRACT

This article analyzes spending on mental health by the Brazilian Ministry of Health between 2001 and 2014. It is documental research of the Brazilian Ministry of Health's databases. It analyzes the data using descriptive statistical analysis. Total spending on mental health for the period 2001 to 2014 shows a percentage increase in resources destined for outpatient care, but this increase is a reallocation from hospital services to community-based services and total resources for the mental health program remain at an average of 2.54% of the total health budget. Within outpatient expenditure, spending on medications remains high. Professionals committed to psychiatric reform fight to guarantee that a small fraction of the surplus appropriated by the state is directed towards social policies.


Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services/economics , Financing, Government/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Reform/economics , Health Policy/economics , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/economics , Ambulatory Care Facilities/economics , Ambulatory Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Ambulatory Care Facilities/trends , Brazil , Community Mental Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Community Mental Health Services/trends , Deinstitutionalization/economics , Deinstitutionalization/legislation & jurisprudence , Deinstitutionalization/trends , Financing, Government/trends , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Reform/trends , Health Expenditures/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/trends , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/trends , Health Priorities/economics , Health Priorities/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Priorities/trends , Humans , Patient Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/trends , Residential Treatment/economics , Residential Treatment/legislation & jurisprudence , Residential Treatment/trends , Substance-Related Disorders/economics , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy
16.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 39(11): 2209-14, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26503067

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that drinking during residential treatment is related to various factors, such as patients' general control beliefs and self-efficacy, as well as to external control of alcohol use by program's staff and situations where there is temptation to drink. As alcohol use during treatment has been shown to be associated with the resumption of alcohol use after discharge from residential treatment, we aimed to investigate how these variables are related to alcohol use during abstinence-oriented residential treatment programs for alcohol use disorders (AUD). METHODS: In total, 509 patients who entered 1 of 2 residential abstinence-oriented treatment programs for AUD were included in the study. After detoxification, patients completed a standardized diagnostic procedure including interviews and questionnaires. Drinking was assessed by patients' self-report of at least 1 standard drink or by positive breathalyzer testing. The 2 residential programs were categorized as high or low control according to the average number of tests per patient. RESULTS: Regression analysis revealed a significant interaction effect between internal and external control suggesting that patients with high internal locus of control and high frequency of control by staff demonstrated the least alcohol use during treatment (16.7%) while patients with low internal locus of control in programs with low external control were more likely to use alcohol during treatment (45.9%). No effects were found for self-efficacy and temptation. CONCLUSIONS: As alcohol use during treatment is most likely associated with poor treatment outcomes, external control may improve treatment outcomes and particularly support patients with low internal locus of control, who show the highest risk for alcohol use during treatment. High external control may complement high internal control to improve alcohol use prevention while in treatment.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Abstinence/psychology , Alcohol Abstinence/trends , Alcohol-Related Disorders/psychology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/therapy , Motivation , Residential Treatment/trends , Self Efficacy , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Self Report , Treatment Outcome
17.
PLoS One ; 9(7): e101741, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25058403

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can be a difficult condition to treat and has been associated with serious medical and economic issues among U.S. military veterans. Distinguishing between treatment responders vs. non-responders in this population has become an important public health priority. This study was conducted to identify pre-treatment characteristics of U.S. veterans with combat-related PTSD that might contribute to favorable and unfavorable responses to high value treatments for this condition. METHOD: This study focused on 805 patients who completed a VHA PTSD residential program between 2000 and 2007. These patients completed the PTSD Clinical Checklist at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and a four-month follow-up assessment. Latent growth curve analysis (LCGA) was incorporated to determine trajectories of changes in PTSD across these assessments and whether several key clinical concerns for this population were associated with their treatment responses. STUDY FINDINGS: LCGA indicated three distinct trajectories in PTSD outcomes and identified several clinical factors that were prospectively linked with changes in veterans' posttraumatic symptomatology. When compared to a group with high PTSD symptom severity that decreased over the program but relapsed at follow-up (41%), the near half (48.8%) of the sample with an improving trajectory had less combat exposure and superior physical/mental health. However, when compared to a minority (10.2%) with relatively low symptomatology that also remained somewhat stable, patients in the improving group were younger and also reported greater combat exposure, poorer physical/mental health status, and more problems with substance abuse before the start of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that veterans are most likely to benefit from residential treatment in an intermediate range of symptoms and risk factors, including PTSD symptom severity, history of combat exposure, and comorbid issues with physical/mental health. Addressing these factors in an integrative manner could help to optimize the effectiveness of treatments of combat-related PTSD in many cases.


Subject(s)
Combat Disorders/therapy , Psychotherapy , Residential Treatment/trends , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Adult , Combat Disorders/physiopathology , Combat Disorders/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status , Humans , Male , Mental Status Schedule , Middle Aged , Recreation Therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/physiopathology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Veterans
19.
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am ; 23(1): 111-24, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24231171

ABSTRACT

For children diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder and/or intellectual disability, the co-occurrence of serious behavioral disturbance can pose significant health and safety risks, impede normal learning and development, and put great stress on family systems. The complexity and seriousness of the clinical concerns often tax the existing service and funding systems. Although residential treatment has been criticized as an outdated and ineffective mode of treatment, newer models of residential treatment that combine specialized comprehensive services, evidence-based interventions, intensive family support and training, and treatment overlap with community providers can offer an effective and efficient treatment option.


Subject(s)
Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/therapy , Evidence-Based Practice , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Residential Treatment/trends , Behavioral Symptoms/psychology , Behavioral Symptoms/therapy , Child , Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/psychology , Community Integration , Humans , Intellectual Disability/psychology , Male , Patient Discharge , Residential Treatment/methods , Residential Treatment/standards
20.
J Child Sex Abus ; 21(3): 257-72, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22574843

ABSTRACT

One hundred and seventy three male juvenile offenders were followed two years postrelease from a residential treatment facility to assess recidivism and factors related to recidivism. The overall recidivism rate was 23.9%. Logistic regression with stepwise and backward variable selection methods was used to examine the relationship between recidivism and nine specific variables: offense type, age at initial involvement in juvenile justice, child welfare system involvement, termination of parental rights, parental criminal history, family support, program completion status, length of treatment stay, and discharge placement. Offender type was the only factor found to have a significant impact on recidivism with general and substance-involved offenders more likely to recidivate than sex offenders. Implications for future research are discussed.


Subject(s)
Criminals/statistics & numerical data , Juvenile Delinquency/statistics & numerical data , Parent-Child Relations , Residential Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Crime/statistics & numerical data , Criminals/classification , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Juvenile Delinquency/rehabilitation , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Male , Program Evaluation , Residential Treatment/trends , Risk Factors , Sex Offenses/ethnology , Sex Offenses/statistics & numerical data , Social Participation , Social Support , Social Work/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...