Clinical Implications of Removing Race-Corrected Pulmonary Function Tests for African American Patients Requiring Surgery for Lung Cancer.

Importance: Removal of race correction in pulmonary function tests (PFTs) is a priority, given that race correction inappropriately conflates race, a social construct, with biological differences and falsely assumes worse lung function in African American than White individuals. However, the impact of decorrecting PFTs for African American patients with lung cancer is unknown. Objectives: To identify how many hospitals providing lung cancer surgery use race correction, examine the association of race correction with predicted lung function, and test the effect of decorrection on surgeons' treatment recommendations. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this quality improvement study, hospitals participating in a statewide quality collaborative were contacted to determine use of race correction in PFTs. For hospitals performing race correction, percent predicted preoperative and postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was calculated for African American patients who underwent lung cancer resection between January 1, 2015, and September 31, 2022, using race-corrected and race-neutral equations. US cardiothoracic surgeons were then randomized to receive 1 clinical vignette that differed by the use of Global Lung Function Initiative equations for (1) African American patients (percent predicted postoperative FEV1, 49%), (2) other race or multiracial patients (percent predicted postoperative FEV1, 45%), and (3) race-neutral patients (percent predicted postoperative FEV1, 42%). Main Outcomes and Measures: Number of hospitals using race correction in PFTs, change in preoperative and postoperative FEV1 estimates based on race-neutral or race-corrected equations, and surgeon treatment recommendations for clinical vignettes. Results: A total of 515 African American patients (308 [59.8%] female; mean [SD] age, 66.2 [9.4] years) were included in the study. Fifteen of the 16 hospitals (93.8%) performing lung cancer resection for African American patients during the study period reported using race correction, which corresponds to 473 African American patients (91.8%) having race-corrected PFTs. Among these patients, the percent predicted preoperative FEV1 and postoperative FEV1 would have decreased by 9.2% (95% CI, -9.0% to -9.5%; P < .001) and 7.6% (95% CI, -7.3% to -7.9%; P < .001), respectively, if race-neutral equations had been used. A total of 225 surgeons (194 male [87.8%]; mean [SD] time in practice, 19.4 [11.3] years) were successfully randomized and completed the vignette items regarding risk perception and treatment outcomes (76% completion rate). Surgeons randomized to the vignette with African American race-corrected PFTs were more likely to recommend lobectomy (79.2%; 95% CI, 69.8%-88.5%) compared with surgeons randomized to the other race or multiracial-corrected (61.7%; 95% CI, 51.1%-72.3%; P = .02) or race-neutral PFTs (52.8%; 95% CI, 41.2%-64.3%; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Given the findings of this quality improvement study, surgeons should be aware of changes in PFT testing because removal of race correction PFTs may change surgeons' treatment decisions and potentially worsen existing disparities in receipt of lung cancer surgery among African American patients.

Practical guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults.

Unexplained exertional dyspnoea or fatigue can arise from a number of underlying disorders and shows only a weak correlation with resting functional or imaging tests. Noninvasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) offers a unique, but still under-utilised and unrecognised, opportunity to study cardiopulmonary and metabolic changes simultaneously. CPET can distinguish between a normal and an abnormal exercise response and usually identifies which of multiple pathophysiological conditions alone or in combination is the leading cause of exercise intolerance. Therefore, it improves diagnostic accuracy and patient health care by directing more targeted diagnostics and facilitating treatment decisions. Consequently, CPET should be one of the early tests used to assess exercise intolerance. However, this test requires specific knowledge and there is still a major information gap for those physicians primarily interested in learning how to systematically analyse and interpret CPET findings. This article describes the underlying principles of exercise physiology and provides a practical guide to performing CPET and interpreting the results in adults.

Forced oscillatory parameters as predictors of COPD assessment test improvement in untreated COPD patients.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined whether baseline spirometry and the forced oscillation technique (FOT) would predict The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score improvement after treatment of untreated COPD patients. METHODS: The study subjects included 65 untreated COPD patients. They underwent the CAT, spirometry, and FOT (MostGraph) before and after treatment for more than 2 months. In addition, recursive partitioning analysis was performed using spirometry and the FOT parameters to identify the predictors of CAT improvement (CAT score ≥2). RESULTS: CAT scores and lung function significantly improved after treatment. Recursive partitioning analysis identified 3 improved classes, defined by Rrs at 20 Hz (R20), Xrs at 5 Hz (X5), and ΔX5, but not by spirometry. The accuracy of predicting CAT improvement was as follows: odds ratio, 25.3; 95 % confidence interval, 6.1 to 104.1; sensitivity, 91.2 %; specificity, 71.0 %; positive likelihood ratio, 3.14; and negative likelihood ratio, 0.12. CONCLUSIONS: FOT helps predict improved health status in untreated COPD patients.

Normative reference equations of airway dynamics assessed by whole-body plethysmography during spontaneous breathing evaluated in infants, children, and adults.

Effective specific airway resistance (sReff ), its reciprocal the effective specific airway conductance (sGeff ) are computed as ratios between the integral of the resistive aerodynamic work of breathing (sWOB) and the integral of the tidal flow/volume loop, the reciprocal, respectively. Unfortunately, reference equations to obtain normative values for sReff , sGeff , and sWOB are not yet available. To assess reference equations for sWOB, sReff , and sGeff during tidal breathing at resting level in healthy infants, children, and adults by a multidimensional model. Retrospectively exported data were collected from databases of five Swiss lung function centers, in which plethysmography (Jaeger Würzburg, Germany) was performed for the assessment of airway dynamics, static lung volumes, and forced breathing flow-volume loops, in a collective of 28 healthy infants, 47 children, and 273 adults. From this cohort, reference equations were computed based on anthropometric measures, lung volumes, indices of the breathing pattern, and timing of breathing. By multi-linear modeling reference equations of sReff , sGeff , and sWOB could be defined taking as independent parameters apart from anthropometric parameters, also parameters given by the ratio between the tidal volume and functional residual capacity (FRCpleth /VT ), and the ratio between VT and inspiratory time (VT /TI ). An alternative statistical approach to define reference equations of airway dynamics reveals that apart from the subject's anthropometric measurements, parameters of the magnitude of static lung volumes, the breathing pattern, and the timing of breathing are co-variants of reference equations of airway dynamics over a large age range.

Pragmatic Recommendations for the Management of Acute Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Management of patients with severe or critical COVID-19 is mainly modeled after care for patients with severe pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from other causes, and these recommendations are based on evidence that often originates from investigations in resource-rich intensive care units located in high-income countries. Often, it is impractical to apply these recommendations to resource-restricted settings, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We report on a set of pragmatic recommendations for acute respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation management in patients with severe/critical COVID-19 in LMICs. We suggest starting supplementary oxygen when SpO2 is persistently lower than 94%. We recommend supplemental oxygen to keep SpO2 at 88-95% and suggest higher targets in settings where continuous pulse oximetry is not available but intermittent pulse oximetry is. We suggest a trial of awake prone positioning in patients who remain hypoxemic; however, this requires close monitoring, and clear failure and escalation criteria. In places with an adequate number and trained staff, the strategy seems safe. We recommend to intubate based on signs of respiratory distress more than on refractory hypoxemia alone, and we recommend close monitoring for respiratory worsening and early intubation if worsening occurs. We recommend low-tidal volume ventilation combined with FiO2 and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) management based on a high FiO2/low PEEP table. We recommend against using routine recruitment maneuvers, unless as a rescue therapy in refractory hypoxemia, and we recommend using prone positioning for 12-16 hours in case of refractory hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg, FiO2 ≥ 0.6 and PEEP ≥ 10 cmH2O) in intubated patients as standard in ARDS patients. We also recommend against sharing one ventilator for multiple patients. We recommend daily assessments for readiness for weaning by a low-level pressure support and recommend against using a T-piece trial because of aerosolization risk.

Peak In- and Expiratory Flow Revisited: Reliability and Reference Values in Adults.

BACKGROUND: While peak in- and expiratory flow rates offer valuable information for diagnosis and monitoring in respiratory disease, these indices are usually considered too variable to be routinely used for quantification in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to obtain reproducible measurements of maximal inspiratory flow rates and to construct reference equations for peak in- and expiratory flows (PIF and PEF). METHOD: With coaching for maximal effort, 187 healthy Caucasian subjects (20-80 years) performed at least 3 combined forced inspiratory and expiratory manoeuvres, until at least 2 peak inspiratory flow measurements were within 10% of each other. The effect on PIF preceded by a slow expiration instead of a forced expiration and PIF repeatability over 3 different days was also investigated in subgroups. Reference values and limits of normal for PIF, mid-inspiratory flow, and PEF were obtained according to the Lambda-Mu-Sigma statistical method. RESULTS: A valid PIF could be obtained within 3.3 ± 0.6(SD) attempts, resulting in an overall within-test PIF variability of 4.6 ± 3.2(SD)%. A slow instead of a forced expiration prior to forced inspiration resulted in a significant (p < 0.001) but small PIF increase (2.5% on average). Intraclass correlation coefficient for between-day PIF was 0.981 (95% CI: 0.960-0.992). Over the entire age range, inter-subject PIF variability was smaller than in previous reports, and PIF could be predicted based on its determinants gender, age, and height (r2 = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: When adhering to similar criteria for the measurement of effort-dependent portions of inspiratory and expiratory flow-volume curves, performed according to current ATS/ERS standards, it is possible to obtain reproducible PIF and PEF values for use in routine clinical practice.

Practical considerations for spirometry during the COVID-19 outbreak: Literature review and insights.

BACKGROUND: As the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is spreading worldwide, countries are dealing with different phases of the pandemic. Lately, scientific evidence has been growing about the measures for reopening respiratory outpatient services during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aim to summarize the key differences and similarities among recommendations by different national and international organizations. METHODS: We searched on Google and Pubmed for recently published National and International Recommendations/Guidelines/Position Papers from professional organizations and societies, offering a guidance to physicians on how to safely perform pulmonary function testing during COVID-19 pandemic. We also searched for spirometry manufacturers' operational indications. RESULTS: Indications on spirometry were released by the Chinese Task force, the American Thoracic Society, the European Respiratory Society, the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, the Société de Pneumologie de Langue Française, the Spanish Societies (Sociedad Espanola de Neumologia y Cirugia Toracica, Sociedad Espanola de Alergologia e Inmunologia Clinica, Asociacion de Especialistas en Enfermeria del trabajo, Asociacion de Enfermeria Comunitaria), the Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia, the British Thoracic Society/Association for Respiratory Technology & Physiology, the Irish Thoracic Society, the Sociedad Uruguaya de Neumologia, the Italian Thoracic Society and the Italian Respiratory Society, Cleveland Clinic and Nebraska Medical Center. Detailed technical recommendations were found on manufacturers' websites. We found several similarities across available guidelines for safely resuming pulmonary function services, as well as differences in criteria for selecting eligible patients for which spirometry is deemed essential and advice which was not homogenous on room ventilation precautions. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a synthesis of national/international guidelines allowing practicing physicians to adapt and shape the way to organize their outpatient services locally. There is generally good agreement on the importance of limiting pulmonary function testing to selected cases only. However, significant differences concerning the subsets of candidate patients, as well as on the management of adequate room ventilation, were observed.

Impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en los laboratorios de función pulmonar: consideraciones sobre el «hoy» y el «día después» / Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lung Function Laboratories: Considerations for "Today" and the "Day After"

No disponible

Point-of-care blood gas analyzers have an impact on the acceptance of donor lungs for transplantation.

An organ donor PaO2 above 40 kPa is generally required for lung transplantation. Point-of-care (POC) blood gas analyzers are commonly used by organ procurement organizations (OPO) but may underestimate the PaO2 at high levels. We hypothesized that changing to a more accurate blood gas analyzer would result in additional lungs transplanted. All PaO2 measurements on organ donors managed at one OPO's recovery center were performed on an i-STAT POC analyzer prior to October 2015, and on a GEM 4000 subsequently. For 24 weeks, all blood gases were tested simultaneously on both analyzers. We compared lung outcomes of 147 donors in the year prior to this change (using the i-STAT) with 56 donors in the 24-week study period (using the GEM 4000 for lung allocation). When the PaO2 was above 40 kPa, the i-STAT PaO2 was 7.2 kPa lower on average than the GEM 4000. When the GEM PaO2 measured between 40 and 50 kPa, the corresponding i-STAT PaO2 value registered less than 40 kPa 25 out of 48 times (52%), with an average difference of 7.3 kPa (SD = 2.9). The rate of lungs transplanted using the GEM 4000 was 48% compared with 35% in the year prior using the i-STAT (p = .11), with equivalent recipient outcomes. The i-STAT analyzer underestimated the PaO2 above 40 kPa and changing to a more accurate PaO2 analyzer may increase lungs transplanted.

A comparison of the CFHH criteria against the Leeds criteria in determining the Pseudomonas aeruginosa status among adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) status influences management decisions in cystic fibrosis (CF) but diagnostic approaches vary. We evaluated the ability of the CFHealthHub (CFHH) criteria, which consist of two major and four minor statements, in diagnosing chronic PA infection among adults with CF. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional analysis, we compared the CFHH criteria against the Leeds criteria. Data were collected between 1st January and 31st December 2016 from all adults with CF receiving care at Sheffield, excluding those with lung transplantation (n = 7) or on ivacaftor (n = 13). The CFHH criteria PA status were cross-tabulated against the Leeds criteria, and clinical outcomes between chronic PA vs non chronic PA for both criteria were compared. RESULTS: This analysis included 186 adults with CF (90 females, median age 27 years, median baseline FEV1 78.5%). The CFHH criteria diagnosed more cases of chronic PA (116/186, 62.4% vs 79/186, 42.5%), and 37/107 cases of non-chronic PA according to the Leeds criteria were deemed chronic PA by the CFHH criteria. The magnitude of difference in %FEV1 decline between chronic PA vs non chronic PA was slightly greater for the CFHH criteria (-0.6%, 95% CI -1.8 to 0.6%) compared to the Leeds criteria (-0.2%, 95% CI -1.3 to 1.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The CFHH criteria detected more chronic PA cases yet still retained similar levels of discrimination for health outcomes in comparison to the Leeds criteria. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the validity of the CFHH criteria among adults with CF.

The reliability of inspiratory resistive load magnitude and detection testing.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the test-retest reliability of inspiratory load detection and load magnitude perception tests in healthy volunteers. DESIGN: Cohort of convenience. SETTING: Respiratory physiology laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty healthy adults. INTERVENTIONS: On two separate occasions participants performed tests of inspiratory loading. Participants breathed through custom made resistive tubing and were asked to indicate when they detected a different resistance during inspiration. In a second test participants rated the magnitude of presented inspiratory loads using the modified Borg score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC2,1) values for repeated tests of inspiratory load detection threshold and load magnitude rating. RESULTS: ICC2,1 values ranged from 0.657-0.786 for load detection testing and 0.739 to 0.969 for rating of load magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: The tests are simple and reliable measures of inspiratory load detection and magnitude rating. They can be used in future research to determine the effectiveness of interventions to reduce the effort of breathing in health and disease.

From deficiency to handicap in the respiratory field: lung function tests (LFT) norms and quality of life (QOL) questionnaires validated for the Tunisian population.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this literature review is to gather all the LFT norms available for the Tunisian population, as well as QDV questionnaires specific to chronic respiratory patients that have been validated in Tunisia. METHODS: This review included a literature search using the PubMed and Sciencedirect databases. The reference lists of the retrieved English/French articles were searched for any additional reference. Specific research has been carried out for each stage of the natural evolution of chronic diseases. For LFT used in the exploration of deficiency, the key-words were ("respiratory function test" OR "spirometry" OR "plethysmography" OR "exhaled fraction of oxide nitric" OR "lung diffusion" OR "peak nasal inspiratory flow" OR "Lung age") AND ("Tunisia" OR "North Africa") AND ("reference equation" OR "reference value" OR "standard reference"). For LFT used in the exploration of incapacity, the key-words were ("exercise test" OR "maximal oxygen uptake" OR "cardiorespiratory test" OR "six minute walk distance" OR "six-minute walk distance" OR "6-minute walk distance" OR "six-min walk distance" OR "6-min walk distance" OR "six minute walking distance" OR "six-minute walking distance" OR "6MWD") AND ("Tunisia" OR "North Africa") AND ("reference equation" OR "reference value" OR "standard reference"). For the QOL questionnaires used in pneumology, the key-words were: ("quality of life" OR "QOL") AND ("respiratory" OR "pulmonology") AND ("Tunisia" OR "North Africa"). RESULTS: As part of deficiency exploration, 11 Tunisian norms are available. As part of incapacity exploration, three Tunisian norms are available for the 6-minute walk test. Only one QOL questionnaire specific to chronic respiratory patients has been validated in Tunisia. CONCLUSION: Despite its richness, the Tunisian "bank" of norms for LFT and QOL questionnaires has yet to be enriched.