Pharmacology of viable mechanism agnostic respiratory stimulants for the reversal of drug-induced respiratory depression in humans.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced respiratory depression is potentially fatal and can be caused by various drugs such as synthetic opioids and tranquilizers. The only class of respiratory depressants that has a specific reversal agent are opioids, such as naloxone. These reversal agents have limited utility in situations of polysubstance ingestion with agents from multiple respiratory depressant classes. Hence, there is an unmet need for drugs that stimulate breathing irrespective of the underlying cause of respiratory depression, i.e. mechanism agnostic respiratory stimulants. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we discuss agnostic respiratory stimulants, tested in humans with promising results, i.e. ampakines, drugs that act at the carotid bodies, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine, and orexin receptor-2-agonist danavorexton, and others that demonstrated positive effects in animals but not yet in humans. EXPERT OPINION: Rapid, effective rescuing of individuals who overdosed on respiratory depressants saves lives. While naloxone is the preferred drug for reversing opioid-induced respiratory depression, its effectiveness is limited in cases involving non-opioids. While several agnostic respiratory stimulants showed promise in humans, further research is needed to optimize dosing, evaluate safety and efficacy in deeper respiratory depression (apnea). Additionally, future studies should combine agnostic stimulants with naloxone, to improve rapid, effective rescue from drug overdoses.

Phase 3 Trial of Sotatercept for Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a progressive disease involving proliferative remodeling of the pulmonary vessels. Despite therapeutic advances, the disease-associated morbidity and mortality remain high. Sotatercept is a fusion protein that traps activins and growth differentiation factors involved in pulmonary arterial hypertension. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 trial in which adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension (World Health Organization [WHO] functional class II or III) who were receiving stable background therapy were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous sotatercept (starting dose, 0.3 mg per kilogram of body weight; target dose, 0.7 mg per kilogram) or placebo every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline at week 24 in the 6-minute walk distance. Nine secondary end points, tested hierarchically in the following order, were multicomponent improvement, change in pulmonary vascular resistance, change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level, improvement in WHO functional class, time to death or clinical worsening, French risk score, and changes in the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT) Physical Impacts, Cardiopulmonary Symptoms, and Cognitive/Emotional Impacts domain scores; all were assessed at week 24 except time to death or clinical worsening, which was assessed when the last patient completed the week 24 visit. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were assigned to receive sotatercept and 160 to receive placebo. The median change from baseline at week 24 in the 6-minute walk distance was 34.4 m (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.0 to 35.5) in the sotatercept group and 1.0 m (95% CI, -0.3 to 3.5) in the placebo group. The Hodges-Lehmann estimate of the difference between the sotatercept and placebo groups in the change from baseline at week 24 in the 6-minute walk distance was 40.8 m (95% CI, 27.5 to 54.1; P<0.001). The first eight secondary end points were significantly improved with sotatercept as compared with placebo, whereas the PAH-SYMPACT Cognitive/Emotional Impacts domain score was not. Adverse events that occurred more frequently with sotatercept than with placebo included epistaxis, dizziness, telangiectasia, increased hemoglobin levels, thrombocytopenia, and increased blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension who were receiving stable background therapy, sotatercept resulted in a greater improvement in exercise capacity (as assessed by the 6-minute walk test) than placebo. (Funded by Acceleron Pharma, a subsidiary of MSD; STELLAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04576988.).

Preoperative Management of Gastrointestinal and Pulmonary Medications: Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) Consensus Statement.

Perioperative medication management is integral to preoperative optimization but remains challenging because of a paucity of literature guidance. Published recommendations are based on the expert opinion of a small number of authors without collaboration from multiple specialties. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) recognized the need for consensus recommendations in this area as well as the unique opportunity for its multidisciplinary membership to fill this void. In a series of articles within this journal, SPAQI provides preoperative medication management guidance based on available literature and expert multidisciplinary consensus. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide practical guidance on the preoperative management of gastrointestinal and pulmonary medications. A panel of experts with anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, hospital medicine, general internal medicine, and medical specialty experience was drawn together and identified the common medications in each of these categories. The authors then used a modified Delphi approach to review the literature and to generate consensus recommendations.

Comparative outcomes in patients receiving pirfenidone or nintedanib for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data regarding outcomes of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are scarce, outside of registries. In France, pirfenidone and nintedanib are only reimbursed for documented IPF, with similar reimbursement criteria with respect to disease characteristics, prescription through a dedicated form, and IPF diagnosis established in multidisciplinary discussion. RESEARCH QUESTION: The data of the comprehensive French National Health System were used to evaluate outcomes in patients newly treated with pirfenidone or nintedanib in 2015-2016. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients aged < 50 years or who had pulmonary fibrosis secondary to an identified cause were excluded. All-cause mortality, acute respiratory-related hospitalisations and treatment discontinuations up to 31 December 2017 were compared using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age, sex, year of treatment initiation, time to treatment initiation and proxies of disease severity identified during a pre-treatment period. RESULTS: During the study period, a treatment with pirfenidone or nintedanib was newly initiated in 804 and 509 patients, respectively. No difference was found between groups for age, sex, time to treatment initiation, Charlson comorbidity score, and number of hospitalisations or medical contacts prior to treatment initiation. As compared to pirfenidone, nintedanib was associated with a greater risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.6), a greater risk of acute respiratory-related hospitalisations (HR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0-1.7) and a lower risk of treatment discontinuation at 12 months (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.6-0.9). INTERPRETATION: This observational study identified potential differences in outcome under newly prescribed antifibrotic drugs, deserving further explorations.

A delayed diagnosis of atypical immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, and X-linked (IPEX) syndrome is a rare monogenic autoimmune disease, which is caused by mutations in the forkhead box protein 3 gene, can affect various systems. The typical clinical manifestations of IPEX are enteropathy, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and skin diseases. However, some atypical phenotypes can easily be misdiagnosed clinically. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 9-year-and-7-month old patient suffered from recurrent wheezing, hematochezia, and eczematous dermatitis at the age of six months, but did not have any manifestations of autoimmune endocrinopathy. The patient was treated with glucocorticoids for more than six years, and he developed bronchiectasis. DIAGNOSIS: Whole exome sequencing revealed a hemizygous pathogenic mutation c.1010G>A, p. (Arg337Gln) in Forkhead box protein 3 gene (NM_014009.3). INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with oral mycophenolate mofetil combined with inhaled budesonide formoterol for six months after diagnosis. OUTCOMES: The respiratory symptoms of the patient seemed to be controlled but eczematous dermatitis progressed, which led the patient to give up the treatment. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis and treatment of IPEX are crucial. Lung injury may be a major problem in the later stages of atypical IPEX, and mycophenolate mofetil seems to control the respiratory symptoms, but could induce significant skin side effects.

Effect of Age on the Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple-Therapy Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Patients With COPD: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Informing the Pathway of COPD Treatment Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the Informing the Pathway of COPD Treatment (IMPACT) trial, single-inhaler triple-therapy fluticasone furoate (FF), umeclidinium (UMEC), and vilanterol (VI) reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates vs FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with symptomatic COPD and a history of exacerbations, with a similar safety profile. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are trial outcomes with single-inhaler triple-therapy FF/UMEC/VI vs FF/VI and UMEC/VI affected by age in patients with symptomatic COPD and a history of exacerbations? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: IMPACT was a phase III, double-blind, 52-week trial. Patients ≥ 40 years of age with symptomatic COPD and ≥ 1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the previous year were randomly assigned 2:2:1 to FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg, FF/VI 100/25 µg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg. End points assessed by age included annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline (CFB) in trough FEV1, proportion of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) responders (≥ 4 units decrease from baseline in SGRQ total score), and safety. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population comprised 10,355 patients; 4,724 (46%), 4,225 (41%), and 1,406 (14%) were ≤ 64, 65 to 74, and ≥ 75 years of age, respectively. FF/UMEC/VI reduced on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation rates vs FF/VI (% reduction [95% CI]: ≤ 64 years, 8% [-1 to 16]; P = .070; 65-74 years, 22% [14-29]; P < .001; ≥ 75 years, 18% [3-31]; P = .021) and vs UMEC/VI (≤ 64 years, 16% [7-25]; P = .002; 65-74 years, 33% [25-41]; P < .001; ≥ 75 years, 24% [6-38]; P = .012), with greatest rate reduction seen in the 65 to 74 and ≥ 75 years subgroups. Post hoc analyses of CFB in trough FEV1 and proportion of SGRQ responders at week 52 were significantly greater with FF/UMEC/VI than with FF/VI or UMEC/VI in all subgroups. No new safety signals were identified. INTERPRETATION: FF/UMEC/VI reduced the rate of moderate/severe exacerbations and improved lung function and health status vs FF/VI and UMEC/VI irrespective of age for most end points, with a similar safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02164513; URL: www.clinicaltrials.govCTT116855.

Metabolism-based Drug-drug Interactions in Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases: A Review Focusing on Drugs Affecting the Respiratory System.

BACKGROUND: Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) are increasing in prevalence, as reported by the World Health Organization (WHO). Patients with CRDs usually require co-administration of multiple drugs due to the complex pathogenic mechanisms of CRDs and the existence of concomitant diseases. Polypharmacy (co-administration of more than four medications) is the main risk factor of the occurrence of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that may lead to reducing treatment efficacy and/or increasing adverse effects. METHODS: This literature-based review focuses on metabolism-based DDIs, the most prevalent DDIs responsible for difficulties in therapeutic management in patients with CRDs. RESULTS: Clinically relevant metabolism-based DDIs occur between drugs used for the treatment of respiratory diseases (corticosteroids, orally inhaled bronchodilators, methylxanthines, anti-leukotrienes, antimicrobials, endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, antitussives, and antineoplastic agents) and drugs affecting cytochrome P450 (CYP) (inducers and inhibitors). Considering alternative therapies, adjusting medication doses, or monitoring patients during treatment are recommended to prevent the harmful consequences of these interactions. CONCLUSION: Providing information on clinically relevant interactions of drugs more likely prescribed in daily practices of physicians is essential to improve patient safety. A list of known metabolism-based interactions of drugs affecting the respiratory systems should be available for physicians engaged in the treatment of CRDs.

Real-life experiences in a single center: efficacy of pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and fibrotic idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia patients.

BACKGROUND: Pirfenidone is the first antifibrotic drug approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and it is used in the treatment of other interstitial pneumonias, such as unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (ILD) and connective tissue-related ILD. This study examined the efficacy of pirfenidone in patients with IPF and fibrotic idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (f-iNSIP). METHODS: In a retrospective real-life study, 67 IPF and 24 f-iNSIP patients were enrolled and classified into a pirfenidone group and a non-antifibrotic group. The level of forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months were recorded. The level of KL-6 in serum was detected by chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). The prognosis and safety outcomes were collected from patients. RESULTS: In IPF patients, pirfenidone decreased the mean change of FVC and DLco, and decreased the proportion of patients with a ⩾10% decline in FVC or a ⩾15% decline in DLco compared with the non-antifibrotic group. There was no difference in the mean change of FVC and DLco between smokers and non-smokers who received pirfenidone treatment. There was an improvement in progression-free survival, defined as the time to the first occurrence of acute exacerbation or death related to pulmonary fibrosis. Moreover, the ratio of patients who experienced acute exacerbation and death related to pulmonary fibrosis was lower in the pirfenidone group. There was no change in lung function and prognosis between the pirfenidone and non-antifibrotic groups in f-iNSIP patients. The KL-6 level slightly decreased after 1 year of pirfenidone treatment but not significantly. Gastrointestinal and skin-related adverse events were most common, and four patients ceased treatment due to the side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pirfenidone safely reduced disease progression by improving the lung function and progression-free survival in IPF patients, with acceptable side effects. The efficacy of pirfenidone on f-iNSIP was not significant, suggesting the need for further studies.The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Prognostic significance of forced vital capacity decline prior to and following antifibrotic therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal interstitial lung disease (ILD). Currently, two antifibrotic drugs are available for reducing forced vital capacity (FVC) decline in IPF. However, many pulmonologists wait before initiating treatment, especially when IPF patients have stable disease. This study aimed to investigate the impact on survival outcome of FVC decline and a slow rate of FVC decline prior to and following treatment with these two antifibrotic drugs. METHODS: Out of the 235 IPF patients treated with antifibrotic therapy that were screened, 105 cases were eligible, who then underwent physiological evaluation at 6 months prior to and following antifibrotic therapy. Clinical characteristics and prognostic outcomes were compared among groups, and prognostic factors were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: In terms of %FVC decline prior to the therapy and a slow rate of FVC decline, there was no significant difference between stable and worsened groups and responder and non-responder groups, respectively. On the other hand, in terms of %FVC decline (decline >5%) following antifibrotic therapy, the stable/improved group had significantly better prognosis than the worsened group. Prognostic analysis revealed that a stable/improved status following antifibrotic therapy [HR: 0.35 (0.15-0.87)] was significantly associated with a better prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Concerning the FVC decline prior to and following antifibrotic therapy and a slow rate of FVC decline, only the FVC decline following the therapy is associated with a greater survival outcome. An early treatment decision may thus be beneficial for IPF.The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Effect of monoclonal antibody drug therapy on mucosal biomarkers in airway disease: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibody therapies have a growing role in treating refractory airway disease. OBJECTIVE: The review aimed to summarize the response of respiratory mucosa to monoclonal antibody treatments in inflammatory airway conditions. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review including risk of bias assessment. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed from 1 January 2000 to 16 November 2019 were searched. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligible studies assessed the immunological and histological response of airway mucosa to monoclonal antibody therapy compared with baseline or a comparison group in patients with respiratory diseases (asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis and allergic rhinitis). Any prospective interventional studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and single-arm trials, were eligible. RESULTS: There were 4195 articles screened, and full-text analysis produced n = 11 studies with extractable data. Nine were RCTs, and two were single-arm trials. These studies focused on asthma (n = 9 articles), chronic rhinosinusitis (n = 1) and allergic rhinitis (n = 1). Five monoclonal antibody drugs were assessed (omalizumab, mepolizumab, dupilumab, benralizumab and tralokinumab). Risk of bias was low (n = 6) or unclear (n = 3) in the RCTs and moderate in the single-arm trials. Omalizumab reduced the mucosal concentration of its target, IgE. Dupilumab reduced the concentration of one of its targets, IL-13, but not IL-4. Omalizumab, mepolizumab and benralizumab reduced tissue eosinophil cell density. Dupilumab decreased mucosal eosinophil granule proteins. Tralokinumab did not affect airway mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the expected biological response of monoclonal antibody therapy on biomarkers in disease tissue provides an important supplement to data about clinical outcomes. An understanding of the biological effect is essential to identify likely responders, reasons for treatment failure and necessary adjustments to monoclonal antibody treatment. Further investigation into the effect of monoclonal antibody therapy on disease mucosa and more precise endotyping are required to move closer to achieving personalized medicine.

Granulocyte-targeted therapies for airway diseases.

The average respiration rate for an adult is 12-20 breaths per minute, which constantly exposes the lungs to allergens and harmful particles. As a result, respiratory diseases, which includes asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute lower respiratory tract infections (LTRI), are a major cause of death worldwide. Although asthma, COPD and LTRI are distinctly different diseases with separate mechanisms of disease progression, they do share a common feature - airway inflammation with intense recruitment and activation of granulocytes and mast cells. Neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, and mast cells are crucial players in host defense against pathogens and maintenance of lung homeostasis. Upon contact with harmful particles, part of the pulmonary defense mechanism is to recruit these cells into the airways. Despite their protective nature, overactivation or accumulation of granulocytes and mast cells in the lungs results in unwanted chronic airway inflammation and damage. As such, understanding the bright and the dark side of these leukocytes in lung physiology paves the way for the development of therapies targeting this important mechanism of disease. Here we discuss the role of granulocytes in respiratory diseases and summarize therapeutic strategies focused on granulocyte recruitment and activation in the lungs.

Impact of CFTR modulator use on outcomes in people with severe cystic fibrosis lung disease.

Drug compounds that augment the production and activity of the cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane regulator (CFTR) have revolutionised CF care. Many adults and some children with CF suffer advanced and severe lung disease or await lung transplantation. While the hope is that these drug compounds will prevent lung damage when started early in life, there is an ongoing need to care for people with advanced lung disease. The focus of this review is the accumulating data from clinical trials and case series regarding the benefits of CFTR modulator therapy in people with advanced pulmonary disease. We address the impact of treatment with ivacaftor, lumacaftor/ivacaftor, tezacaftor/ivacaftor and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on lung function, pulmonary exacerbations, nutrition and quality of life. Adverse events of the different CFTR modulators, as well as the potential for drug-drug interactions, are discussed.

Impact of Comorbidities and Commonly Used Drugs on Mortality in COPD - Real-World Data from a Primary Care Setting.

Background: Life expectancy is significantly shorter for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) than the general population. Concurrent diseases are known to infer an increased mortality risk in those with COPD, but the effects of pharmacological treatments on survival are less established. This study aimed to examine any associations between commonly used drugs, comorbidities and mortality in Swedish real-world primary care COPD patients. Methods: Patients with physician-diagnosed COPD from a large primary care population were observed retrospectively, utilizing primary care records and mandatory Swedish national registers. The time to all-cause death was assessed in a stepwise multiple Cox proportional hazards regression model including demography, socioeconomic factors, exacerbations, comorbidities and medication. Results: During the observation period (1999-2009) 5776 (32.5%) of 17,745 included COPD patients died. Heart failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74-2.04), stroke (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.40-1.64) and myocardial infarction (HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.24-1.58) were associated with an increased risk of death. Use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS; HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66-0.94), beta-blockers (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.97) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA; HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77-0.98) was dose-dependently associated with a decreased risk of death, whereas use of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA; HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.14-1.55) and N-acetylcysteine (NAC; HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08-1.48) were dose-dependently associated with an increased risk of death in COPD patients. Conclusion: This large, retrospective, observational study of Swedish real-world primary care COPD patients indicates that coexisting heart failure, stroke and myocardial infarction were the strongest predictors of death, underscoring the importance of timely recognition and treatment of comorbidities. A decreased risk of death associated with the use of ICS, beta-blockers and ASA, and an increased risk associated with the use of LAMA and NAC, was also found.

Statin Use and the Risk of Subsequent Hospitalized Exacerbations in COPD Patients with Frequent Exacerbations.

Rationale: The potential benefits of statins for the prevention of exacerbations in patients with COPD remains controversial. No previous studies have investigated the impact of statins on clinical outcomes in COPD patients with frequent exacerbations. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the use of statins and the risk of subsequent hospitalized exacerbations in COPD frequent exacerbators. Materials and Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. 139,223 COPD patients with a first hospitalized exacerbation between 2004 and 2012 were analyzed. Among them, 35,482 had a second hospitalized exacerbation within a year after the first exacerbation, and were defined as frequent exacerbators. 1:4 propensity score matching was used to create matched samples of statin users and non-users. The competing risk regression analysis model was used to evaluate the association between statin use and exacerbation risk. Results: The use of statins was associated with a significantly reduced risk in subsequent hospitalized exacerbations in COPD patients after their first hospitalized exacerbation (adjusted subdistribution hazard ration [SHR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.85-0.93, P<0.001). In frequent exacerbators, the SHR for subsequent hospitalized exacerbations in statins users was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81-0.94, P=0.001). Subgroup analysis among frequent exacerbators demonstrated that the use of statins only provided a protective effect against subsequent hospitalized exacerbations in male patients aged 75 years and older, with coexisting diabetes mellitus, hypertension or cardiovascular disease, and no protective effect was observed in those with lung cancer or depression. Current use of statins was associated with a greater protective effect for reducing subsequent hospitalized exacerbation. Conclusion: The use of statins was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of hospitalized exacerbations in COPD patients after a first hospitalized exacerbation and in specified COPD frequent exacerbators.

[The clinical analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients complicated with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease].

Objectives: Long-term use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) was reported as a risk factor for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) complicated with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTM-LD). But it was not reported often in China. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who were diagnosed with COPD and NTM-LD in our department from January 1(st) 2017 to December 31(th) 2018. Results: This study consisted of 10 male and 5 female patients with a mean age of (66±7) years. The detailed clinical data and radiological images were reviewed systemically. There were 4 current smokers (26.7%) and 6 past smokers (40%). All cases were current ICS users, with a mean duration of (27.3±9.7) months, ranging from 3 months to 61 months. Among them, 8 cases (53.3%) used inhaled fluticasone and 7 cases (46.7%) used inhaled budesonide. Aggravated coughing (15 cases, 100%), expectoration (15 cases, 100%) and dyspnea (10 cases, 66.7%) were the common clinical manifestations, although fever was only reported in 4 cases (26.7%). All cases showed normal white blood cell count and lymphocyte count, and some of them (7 cases, 46.7%) showed elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein. Most of them (14 cases, 93.3%) had normal TB-SPOT results. Multiple focal bronchiectasis (9 cases, 60%) and significant emphysema (12 cases, 80%) were the common manifestations of basic high-resolution CT (HRCT) prior NTM infection. The occurrence of bronchiectasis (15 cases, 100%), "tree in bud" sign (12 cases, 80%) and tiny cavities (8 cases, 53.3%) were the common HRCT abnormalities for the NTM-LD cases. According to the 2007's NTM-LD diagnosis criteria, most of them (13 cases, 86.7%) were diagnosed with positive sputum samples at least twice, and 2 cases were diagnosed with positive CT-directed bronchial alveolar lavage fluid. NTM-PCR analysis was performed routinely for the isolated NTM samples to identify the NTM species. Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) was the most common NTM species (8 cases, 53.3%). After treatment with proposed anti-NTM strategies, most cases improved (9 cases, 60%), and some of them (4 cases, 26.7%) were cured and a few cases (2 cases, 13.3%) relapsed. Conclusions: When COPD patients treated with ICS showed aggravated cough, expectation and/or dyspnea, and new occurrence of bronchiectasis and/or "tree in bud" sign in the recent HRCT, the differential diagnosis of NTM-LD should be considered. Respiratory samples should be arranged for NTM cultures and PCR analysis as soon as possible. Earlier antimicrobial strategies according to the identified NTM species would improve the clinical outcomes.

The therapy of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: what is next?

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive, fibrosing interstitial lung disease, characterised by progressive scarring of the lung and associated with a high burden of disease and early death. The pathophysiological understanding, clinical diagnostics and therapy of IPF have significantly evolved in recent years. While the recent introduction of the two antifibrotic drugs pirfenidone and nintedanib led to a significant reduction in lung function decline, there is still no cure for IPF; thus, new therapeutic approaches are needed. Currently, several clinical phase I-III trials are focusing on novel therapeutic targets. Furthermore, new approaches in nonpharmacological treatments in palliative care, pulmonary rehabilitation, lung transplantation, management of comorbidities and acute exacerbations aim to improve symptom control and quality of life. Here we summarise new therapeutic attempts and potential future approaches to treat this devastating disease.

Counseling of inhalation medicine perceived by patients and their healthcare providers: insights from North Cyprus.

Background In order to achieve patient adherence, individuals require different levels of information. Basic and adequate information must be provided by different health care providers to patients. Objective To assess the information level of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to determine the source of their information regarding the medicine they use in addition to their satisfaction, inhalation usage techniques and perception of the information providing role of health care professionals. Setting Respiratory disease clinics in Nicosia and Famagusta state hospitals and community pharmacies in North Cyprus. Method A cross-sectional multicentered observational study was carried out in respiratory disease clinics and community pharmacies. Patients' knowledge and healthcare providers' perceptions of their roles were evaluated using "The satisfaction with information about medicines scale". Evaluation of patient's inhalation techniques was performed using a validated checklist. Main outcome measure (a) Patients' knowledge of their medication and satisfaction with the information provided by health care professionals, (b) the prevalence of critical inhalation mistakes, (c) health care professionals' perceptions of their patient counseling practice. Results A total of 110 patients were evaluated, and 6 physicians and 76 pharmacists were recruited for the interview. The health care professionals reported that they talk about the action and the use of medicines with the patients. The standardized average patients' satisfaction score for action and use was 0.35 (± 0.21), whereas for potential side effects, it was 0.26 (± 0.15). Even though 92% of patients believed that they use their inhaler properly, 75% of the patients made at least one critical mistake while using the inhalation demo, which would likely affect the delivery of the medicine to the lungs. Conclusion In spite of health care professionals feeling comfortable with their counseling practices, the majority of patients reported dissatisfaction with the information they provided about medicine, and three out of four patients were making critical mistakes in the use of inhalers. More effort is warranted by health care professionals on patient education to limit critical mistakes.

A systematic review of pharmacotherapeutic clinical trial end-points for bronchiectasis in adults.

Bronchiectasis is an increasing clinical problem, but multiple recent clinical trials have failed to reach their primary end-point. Difficulties in achieving "positive" bronchiectasis trials is reflected in a lack of agreement from trialists and regulators on what are the optimal end-points.To evaluate the use of end-points in bronchiectasis trials, we conducted a systematic review of published bronchiectasis trials from 2008 to 2018 and extracted end-points used, definitions, methods of analysis and responsiveness.Our analysis shows that quality of life and exacerbation end-points are most frequently used. Trials using exacerbation end-points have been characterised by varying definitions, multiple methods of analysis and durations of follow-up. There are multiple quality of life tools for bronchiectasis (Quality of Life - Bronchiectasis questionnaire, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, etc.). The majority of studies measure lung function (e.g. forced expiratory volume in 1 s), but this is shown to be nonresponsive to the majority of interventions. Microbiology end-points frequently show statistically significant differences in phase 2 antibiotic studies but their correlation with clinical end-points is unknown.This systematic review demonstrates a need for guidance to standardise definitions and design features to improve reproducibility and increase the likelihood of demonstrating statistically significant benefits with new therapies.

Population/regional differences in efficacy of 3 drug categories (antidiabetic, respiratory and psychotropic agents) among East Asians: A retrospective study based on multiregional clinical trials.

AIMS: This study aimed to identify population/regional differences in drug efficacy and the influencing factors among East Asians to be considered when planning multiregional clinical trials (MRCTs) to facilitate rapid drug approval in Asians. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of efficacy (intergroup difference in endpoint between control and study drug treatment) among East Asian populations for 3 drug categories, antidiabetic, respiratory and psychotropic agents, was conducted in collaboration with pharmaceutical companies using their MRCT data. Common endpoints by drug category were selected; background factors that commonly affected the endpoints among regions were analysed first; then the population/regional differences were evaluated by the interaction term region-by-treatment using an analysis of covariance model after adjusting for background factors. RESULTS: Among 17 endpoints for eight pharmaceutical products from 3 drug categories, no substantial population/regional differences were detected in the 3 drug categories examined (P > .05), except for haemoglobin A1c change between Japan and Korea for an antidiabetic drug, insulin glulisine (P = .0068). However, no such regional differences were evident in patients with clinically important higher haemoglobin A1c baseline values (majority subgroup). Variability in disease severity at baseline and concomitant drugs were determined to be potential influencing factors for regional differences. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the regional variability in efficacy of these 3 drug categories is not large among East Asians, and reveals the importance of considering background factors when planning MRCTs. Further studies are needed to evaluate regional variability in the efficacy of other drug categories and clarify the factors leading to regional differences in East Asians.