Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 36
Filter
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(6): 1254-1256, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35608817

ABSTRACT

Quantifying the effect of public health actions on population health is essential when justifying sustained public health investment. Using modeling, we conservatively estimated that rapid response to a multistate foodborne outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium in the United States in 2018 potentially averted 94 reported cases and $633,181 in medical costs and productivity losses.


Subject(s)
Public Health , Salads , Salmonella Food Poisoning/epidemiology , Salmonella typhimurium , Animals , Chickens , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Public Health/methods , Salads/adverse effects , Salads/microbiology , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella Food Poisoning/etiology , Salmonella typhimurium/isolation & purification , Salmonella typhimurium/pathogenicity , United States/epidemiology
2.
J Food Prot ; 82(9): 1607-1614, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31436484

ABSTRACT

Gastroenteritis caused from infections with Salmonella enterica (salmonellosis) causes significant morbidity in Australia. In addition to acute gastroenteritis, approximately 8.8% of people develop irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and 8.5% of people develop reactive arthritis (ReA). We estimated the economic cost of salmonellosis and associated sequel illnesses in Australia in a typical year circa 2015. We estimated incidence, hospitalizations, other health care usage, absenteeism, and premature mortality for four age groups using a variety of complementary data sets. We calculated direct costs (health care) and indirect costs (lost productivity and premature mortality) by using Monte Carlo simulation to estimate 90% credible intervals (CrI) around our point estimates. We estimated that 90,833 cases, 4,312 hospitalizations, and 19 deaths occurred from salmonellosis in Australia circa 2015 at a direct cost of AUD 23.8 million (90% CrI, 19.3 to 28.9 million) and a total cost of AUD 124.4 million (90% CrI, 107.4 to 143.1 million). When IBS and ReA were included, the estimated direct cost was 35.7 million (90% CrI, 29.9 to 42.7 million) and the total cost was AUD 146.8 million (90% CrI, 127.8 to 167.9 million). Foodborne infections were responsible for AUD 88.9 million (90% CrI, 63.9 to 112.4 million) from acute salmonellosis and AUD 104.8 million (90% CrI, 75.5 to 132.3 million) when IBS and ReA were included. Targeted interventions to prevent illness could considerably reduce costs and societal impact from Salmonella infections and sequel illnesses in Australia.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Gastroenteritis , Salmonella Infections , Australia , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Prohibitins , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella Infections/economics
3.
Food Res Int ; 116: 802-809, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30717011

ABSTRACT

The study estimates the annual costs of nontyphoidal Salmonellosis (referred to as Salmonellosis from hereon) from fresh produce, poultry and eggs in Canada. It also estimates the economic benefits from introduction of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) in detection of Salmonellosis clusters and outbreaks. Monetary and non-monetary costs from Salmonellosis are estimated. Monetary costs are divided into direct healthcare, indirect, federal and producer costs. Probability models are used to account for uncertainty in the cost-of-illness estimates. Two types of non-monetary costs have been estimated: Disability-adjusted Live Years and Quality-adjusted Life Years. These estimates are then used to calculate the economic impact of WGS on detection of Salmonellosis. The estimated incidence of illnesses is 47,082 annually, which represents a cost of $287.78 million (total cases) and $166.28 million (reported cases) from the traditional technology. The total net benefit from introduction of WGS is estimated to range from $5.21 million-$90.25 million. All monetary values are in CAD unless stated otherwise. WGS will help in reducing the economic burden from Salmonellosis. These estimates help will aid policy related decision making.


Subject(s)
DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Eggs/microbiology , Exome Sequencing/economics , Food Microbiology/economics , Fruit/microbiology , Health Care Costs , Poultry/microbiology , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella/genetics , Vegetables/microbiology , Animals , Canada/epidemiology , Cost Savings , Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Incidence , Life Expectancy , Predictive Value of Tests , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Salmonella Food Poisoning/microbiology , Salmonella Food Poisoning/mortality , Salmonella Food Poisoning/prevention & control
4.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 16(2): 243-257, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29313242

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to derive cost estimates of five major foodborne illnesses (campylobacteriosis, salmonellosis, enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), yersiniosis and shigellosis) in Sweden. These estimates provide a necessary contribution to perform future cost-benefit analyses aimed at reducing the burden of foodborne disease. A secondary aim was to obtain estimates of the true number of cases that occur in the community, thus providing necessary ground for calculating costs. METHODS: The true number of cases for each foodborne illness was simulated by multiplying the reported number of cases by sequential multipliers, one for each potential source of information loss about a case. This assessment of the true number of cases was then used to estimate the number of cases of sequelae for each illness. An incidence-based analysis was then used to calculate direct medical and non-medical costs, as well as indirect costs. Data for estimating the true number of cases for each illness were primarily based on an expert panel, while the derivation of costs mainly utilized national registries, databases and published literature. RESULTS: The estimated number of cases was between 7- and 11-fold higher than the reported number of cases, indicating the importance of taking information loss into account when calculating costs. By far the most common pathogen of the five was campylobacter, with an estimated 101,719 (90% credibility interval [CI] 59,640-158,025) human cases occurring annually. For salmonella, 19,678 (90% CI 8394-40,456) cases were estimated to occur each year, while the other three pathogens were less common, with a yearly incidence of approximately 2500-5500 cases each. The total cost for the five pathogens (including sequelae) amounted to €142 million annually. Campylobacter was the most costly pathogen, representing 69% of the total costs. Salmonellosis and EHEC constituted 18 and 9% of these costs, respectively, while yersiniosis and shigellosis represented approximately 2% each. Costs for sequelae were significant and accounted for approximately 50% of the total costs. CONCLUSIONS: Our simulations indicated that campylobacter infection was more common and more costly than salmonella, EHEC, yersinia and shigella combined. Estimated costs for all illnesses were highly influenced by (1) considering potential information losses about cases in the population (which increased costs 7- to 11-fold), and (2) taking account of post-infection sequelae (which doubled the costs).


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Foodborne Diseases/economics , Campylobacter Infections/complications , Campylobacter Infections/economics , Campylobacter Infections/epidemiology , Dysentery, Bacillary/complications , Dysentery, Bacillary/economics , Dysentery, Bacillary/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/complications , Escherichia coli Infections/economics , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Female , Foodborne Diseases/complications , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Male , Models, Economic , Salmonella Food Poisoning/complications , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella Food Poisoning/epidemiology , Sweden/epidemiology , Yersinia Infections/complications , Yersinia Infections/economics , Yersinia Infections/epidemiology
5.
Eur J Public Health ; 27(2): 325-330, 2017 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27836967

ABSTRACT

Background: In 2012, the Netherlands experienced the most extensive food-related outbreak of Salmonella ever recorded. It was caused by smoked salmon contaminated with Salmonella Thompson during processing. In total, 1149 cases of salmonellosis were laboratory confirmed and reported to RIVM. Twenty percent of cases was hospitalised and four cases were reported to be fatal. The purpose of this study was to estimate total costs of the Salmonella Thompson outbreak. Methods: Data from a case-control study were used to estimate the cost-of-illness of reported cases (i.e. healthcare costs, patient costs and production losses). Outbreak control costs were estimated based on interviews with staff from health authorities. Using the Dutch foodborne disease burden and cost-of-illness model, we estimated the number of underestimated cases and the associated cost-of-illness. Results: The estimated number of cases, including reported and underestimated cases was 21 123. Adjusted for underestimation, the total cost-of-illness would be €6.8 million (95% CI €2.5-€16.7 million) with productivity losses being the main cost driver. Adding outbreak control costs, the total outbreak costs are estimated at €7.5 million. Conclusion: In the Netherlands, measures are taken to reduce salmonella concentrations in food, but detection of contamination during food processing remains difficult. As shown, Salmonella outbreaks have the potential for a relatively high disease and economic burden for society. Early warning and close cooperation between the industry, health authorities and laboratories is essential for rapid detection, control of outbreaks, and to reduce disease and economic burden.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Disease Outbreaks/economics , Food Contamination/economics , Food Preservation/methods , Salmon , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Young Adult
6.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 11(9): 718-26, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24972148

ABSTRACT

Nontyphoidal Salmonella spp. are one of the most common causes of bacterial foodborne illness. Variability in cost inventories and study methodologies limits the possibility of meaningfully interpreting and comparing cost-of-illness (COI) estimates, reducing their usefulness. However, little is known about the relative effect these factors have on a cost-of-illness estimate. This is important for comparing existing estimates and when designing new cost-of-illness studies. Cost-of-illness estimates, identified through a scoping review, were used to investigate the association between descriptive, component cost, methodological, and foodborne illness-related factors such as chronic sequelae and under-reporting with the cost of nontyphoidal Salmonella spp. illness. The standardized cost of nontyphoidal Salmonella spp. illness from 30 estimates reported in 29 studies ranged from $0.01568 to $41.22 United States dollars (USD)/person/year (2012). The mean cost of nontyphoidal Salmonella spp. illness was $10.37 USD/person/year (2012). The following factors were found to be significant in multiple linear regression (p≤0.05): the number of direct component cost categories included in an estimate (0-4, particularly long-term care costs) and chronic sequelae costs (inclusion/exclusion), which had positive associations with the cost of nontyphoidal Salmonella spp. illness. Factors related to study methodology were not significant. Our findings indicated that study methodology may not be as influential as other factors, such as the number of direct component cost categories included in an estimate and costs incurred due to chronic sequelae. Therefore, these may be the most important factors to consider when designing, interpreting, and comparing cost of foodborne illness studies.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella/physiology , Humans , Linear Models , Long-Term Care/economics , Multivariate Analysis , Research Design , Salmonella Food Poisoning/microbiology
7.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 134(1-2): 126-32, 2009 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19427047

ABSTRACT

The objective of this paper is to compare the cost-effectiveness of four decontamination technologies at the pork abattoirs. The four technologies investigated are hot water, steam ultrasound, steam vacuum and lactic acid. In the analysis, the prevalence of Salmonella and the effects of the decontaminating technologies are stochastic with known distributions and they are expected to be implemented without distortion of the existing processing system. Cost data are collected from the Danish Meat Research Institute, suppliers of decontamination technology, abattoirs using the technology as well as the literature. The risk data are based on Danish surveillance data, research projects investigating the effects of different decontamination measures and the literature. Implemented on a full scale in abattoirs, the results suggest that the technologies might reduce Salmonella from the present level of 2.2% to between 0.18 and 0.89%. Among the technologies investigated, steam ultrasound showed to be the most cost-effective method followed by hot water decontamination.


Subject(s)
Abattoirs/economics , Abattoirs/standards , Disinfection/economics , Disinfection/methods , Salmonella/growth & development , Animals , Consumer Product Safety , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Denmark , Disinfection/standards , Food Contamination/economics , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Food Microbiology , Humans , Risk Factors , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella Food Poisoning/prevention & control , Swine
9.
Acta Vet Scand ; 49: 35, 2007 Dec 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18053202

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Costs and benefits of two Salmonella control policies for broiler production were described and compared. The control options were the Zoonosis Directive 92/117/EC and the more intense strategy, the Finnish Salmonella Control Programme (FSCP). METHODS: The comparison included the Salmonella control costs in primary and secondary production and the direct and indirect losses due to Salmonella infections in humans in 2000. RESULTS: The total annual costs of the FSCP were calculated to be 990 400 EUR (0.02 euro/kg broiler meat). The average control costs in the broiler production chain were seven times higher with the FSCP than with the Zoonosis Directive alone. However, the public health costs were 33 times higher with the Zoonosis Directive alone. The value of one prevented loss of life per year exceeded the annual control costs of the FSCP. CONCLUSION: Due to significant savings in public health costs compared to costs of FSCP, the FSCP was found to be economically feasible.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/economics , Food Contamination , Food Microbiology , Poultry , Salmonella Infections, Animal/economics , Salmonella Infections, Animal/prevention & control , Animals , Chickens , Consumer Product Safety/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Finland , Humans , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella Food Poisoning/prevention & control , Zoonoses
10.
Prev Vet Med ; 77(1-2): 1-14, 2006 Nov 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16879887

ABSTRACT

In Denmark, it was agreed to lower the Salmonella prevalence in pork to 1.2% before the end of 2006. The current control did not seem to be sufficient to attain this goal. Therefore, four alternatives to the existing Danish control strategy for Salmonella in pork were compared in a cost-benefit analysis: (1) hot-water decontamination of all pigs at slaughter, (2) sanitary slaughter of pigs from herds with high levels of Salmonella, (3) use of home-mixed feed in herds with slaughter pigs and (4) use of acidified feed for slaughter pigs. The data originated from official statistics, published papers as well as expert opinion. The partial cost-benefit analysis was restricted to slaughterhouses affiliated with the Danish Meat Association and Danish human cases ascribable to pork from these slaughterhouses. Only hot-water decontamination was socio-economically profitable. Hot-water decontamination had a net present value over 15 years of 3.5 million euros. For sanitary slaughter the net present value was - 43.6 million euros, for home-mixed feed it was - 262.3 million euros and for acidified feed it was - 79.9 million euros. For all alternatives the costs were born solely by the pig sector, whereas primarily the consumers and public authorities received the benefits. The conclusions were robust in sensitivity analyses.


Subject(s)
Abattoirs , Food Contamination/economics , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Salmonella Infections, Animal/prevention & control , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , Abattoirs/economics , Abattoirs/standards , Animal Feed , Animals , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Denmark/epidemiology , Disinfection/economics , Disinfection/methods , Disinfection/standards , Food Microbiology , Humans , Meat/microbiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella Food Poisoning/prevention & control , Salmonella Infections, Animal/economics , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Swine , Swine Diseases/economics , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Water
11.
BMC Public Health ; 6: 4, 2006 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16403230

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Salmonella is an infectious agents causing numerous cases of illness each year, and thereby having significant economic impact. Using returning Swedish travellers we estimated the burden of salmonellosis in different European countries. METHODS: From the Swedish database on notifiable communicable diseases 15,864 cases with travel-associated salmonellosis acquired in Europe from 1997-2003 were retrieved. These cases were compared to a dataset from the same years on 14,171 randomly selected Swedish residents, with a history of recent overnight travel in Europe. Distribution of salmonellosis in returning travellers and the distribution of Salmonella Enteritidis was analysed for different member states in the European Union, associated and candidate countries. The risk of being notified with a salmonella infection after return from each European country/region was calculated, and compared with official reporting data rom these countries. Using Norway as reference country, we could 1) construct comparable incidence estimates and 2) calculate the "under-reporting" in each country compared to Norway. RESULTS: The highest burden of salmonellosis was estimated for Bulgaria (2741/100,000), followed by Turkey with 2344/100,000 and Malta with 2141/100,000. S. Enteritidis is the dominating serotype, 66.9 % of all cases and phage type 4 accounts for 37.5 % of the S. Enteritidis cases. CONCLUSION: Using returning tourists as a sentinel population can provide a useful base for comparison of disease burdens in different countries/regions. Focusing prevention of salmonellosis to prevention of egg and poultry associated S. Enteritidis infection will have a major impact from a public health perspective and will significantly lower the burden of disease in most European countries.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Salmonella Food Poisoning/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections/epidemiology , Salmonella enteritidis/isolation & purification , Travel/statistics & numerical data , Bulgaria/epidemiology , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Europe/epidemiology , European Union/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Norway/epidemiology , Primary Prevention , Risk Factors , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella Food Poisoning/prevention & control , Salmonella Infections/economics , Salmonella Infections/prevention & control , Turkey/epidemiology
12.
J Food Prot ; 68(9): 1788-98, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16161675

ABSTRACT

Salmonellosis in humans is a costly disease traditionally assumed to be associated with exposure to contaminated food. We have developed a farm-to-fork model that allows estimation of the human health costs and risks associated with Salmonella in pork. This analysis focuses on the stages of the pork production chain up to the point of producing a chilled pork carcass. The model predicts the number of human cases of salmonellosis associated with pork (mean, 99,430; 90% confidence interval, 20,970 to 245,560) and the corresponding social costs (mean, $81.53 million; 90% confidence interval, $18.75 million to $197.44 million). Sensitivity and scenario analyses suggest that changes in Salmonella status during processing are more important for human health risk and have a higher benefit:cost ratio when compared with on-farm strategies for Salmonella control. Specifically, benefit:cost ratios are less than 1 (indicating they are not likely to be profitable from a social economic perspective) for the on-farm strategies of vaccination and meal feeding, whereas rinsing carcasses at various temperatures with and without sanitizer all have benefit:cost ratios greater than 1 (indicating they are profitable from a social economic perspective). This type of modeling is useful for evaluation of the relative cost effectiveness of interventions at different points in the food chain when allocating limited food safety dollars and is best used for examining trends and alternative strategies rather than for providing definitive dollar value estimates of risk. The dollar value estimates must be considered in the context of the wide confidence intervals.


Subject(s)
Food Handling/methods , Health Care Costs , Meat/microbiology , Salmonella Food Poisoning/etiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/transmission , Swine Diseases/transmission , Animals , Food Contamination/economics , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Food Microbiology , Food-Processing Industry/standards , Humans , Models, Biological , Risk Factors , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella Infections, Animal/prevention & control , Swine , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , United States
14.
Am J Infect Control ; 28(1): 54-7, 2000 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10679138

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial outbreaks of Salmonella infections in Australia are an infrequent but significant source of morbidity and mortality. Such an outbreak results in direct, measurable expenses for acute care management, as well as numerous indirect (and less quantifiable) costs to those affected, the hospital, and the wider community. This article describes the significant direct costs incurred as a result of a nosocomial outbreak of Salmonella infection involving patients and staff. METHOD: Information on costs incurred by the hospital was gathered from a number of sources. The data were grouped into 4 sections (medical costs, investigative costs, lost productivity costs, and miscellaneous) with use of an existing tool for calculating the economic impact of foodborne illness. RESULTS: The outbreak cost the hospital more than AU $120, 000. (US $95,000). This amount is independent of more substantial indirect costs. CONCLUSION: Salmonella infections are preventable. Measures to aid the prevention of costly outbreaks of nosocomial salmonellosis, although available, require an investment of both time and money. We suggest that dedication of limited resources toward such preventive strategies as education is a practical and cost-effective option for health care facilities.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/economics , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Direct Service Costs/statistics & numerical data , Disease Outbreaks/economics , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella Food Poisoning/prevention & control , Salmonella typhimurium , Cross Infection/microbiology , Efficiency, Organizational , Food Handling/economics , Food Handling/standards , Food Service, Hospital/economics , Food Service, Hospital/standards , Humans , Infection Control/economics , Infection Control/methods , Primary Prevention/economics , Primary Prevention/methods , Queensland , Salmonella Food Poisoning/microbiology
15.
Ann Ig ; 12(4): 279-85, 2000.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11140094

ABSTRACT

Salmonellosis is one of the most common forms of foodborne infection. An outbreak of gastroenteritidis associated with a wedding party was investigated, even to value the costs falling on individuals, the health services and society as a whole. One hundred and fifty nine wedding guests were interviewed by phone. Multivariate analysis was used to assess which food were significantly associated with infection. One hundred and thirteen cases were identified; ten stool samples were culture positive for Salmonella enteritidis. Handmade ice-cream and babà (a typical Italian pastry) were significantly associated with infection. The cost of a case was estimated to be between US $ 74 (for non hospitalised patients) and US $ 1,896 (for hospitalised patients). The outbreak was caused by a strain of Salmonella enteritidis and the vehicle of infection were unpasteurised eggs used to prepare the ice-cream. The economic impact of this outbreak was considerable and mainly due to the hospitalisation.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Eggs/microbiology , Food Contamination , Food Microbiology , Ice Cream/microbiology , Salmonella Food Poisoning/epidemiology , Salmonella enteritidis/isolation & purification , Adult , Cost of Illness , Disease Outbreaks/economics , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella Food Poisoning/microbiology
17.
World Health Stat Q ; 50(1-2): 81-9, 1997.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9282390

ABSTRACT

Foodborne diseases caused by non-typhoid Salmonella are a very important public health problem and an economic burden in many parts of the world. Salmonellosis data from the WHO Global Databank on Foodborne Disease, from the literature and from the WHO Surveillance Programme in Europe were reviewed for the years 1985-1995, showing an apparent increase in the incidence of salmonellosis in many parts of the world. In industrialized countries, this increase may be due to the emergence and increase of S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium DT104. In order to reduce the incidence of human foodborne salmonellosis, measures should be taken simultaneously during the production, processing, distribution, retail marketing and handling/preparation of food to prevent the introduction of Salmonella and its multiplication. These control measures need to be supported by effective foodborne disease surveillance programmes which make it possible to recognize and investigate outbreaks and emerging pathogens, and to assess the need for and evaluate interventions by monitoring longer term trends.


Subject(s)
Global Health , Salmonella Food Poisoning/epidemiology , Salmonella Food Poisoning/prevention & control , Food Handling/standards , Humans , Incidence , Population Surveillance , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella Food Poisoning/microbiology , World Health Organization
18.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 21(1-2): 117-29, 1994 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8155469

ABSTRACT

Recent government and public concern about the recorded increase in human salmonellosis in the UK and abroad has stimulated investigations of both the causes and consequences of these infections. This paper discusses the framework for economic analysis of food-borne disease and problems associated with the estimation of costs. A brief review of the literature in this area is given and the results of a national study of the costs of human salmonellosis in England and Wales are presented and used to estimate the likely costs of S. enteritidis infection.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/economics , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella enteritidis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Salmonella Food Poisoning/epidemiology , Salmonella Food Poisoning/prevention & control , United Kingdom/epidemiology
19.
Public Health ; 107(5): 337-41, 1993 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8248468

ABSTRACT

This small pilot study surveyed the victims of an outbreak of food poisoning, in order to investigate the personal consequences which they suffered so as to identify costs, which are often ignored in economic analyses. A response rate of 88% was achieved. The results showed that an average of 10.5 days of illness was suffered by the affected individuals and there was a marked variation in the number of days of work missed. Housewives were identified as a group whose personal consequences are often omitted from economic studies and a variety of other costs were identified. The results should be borne in mind when undertaking future economic studies of food poisoning.


Subject(s)
Absenteeism , Cost of Illness , Disease Outbreaks/economics , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Adult , England/epidemiology , Humans , Pilot Projects , Salmonella Food Poisoning/epidemiology
20.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 15(3-4): 207-13, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1419524

ABSTRACT

Foodborne salmonellosis constitutes a major health problem in many countries. Moreover, the costs associated with salmonellosis could be considerable. There are thus strong arguments for preventive efforts. Ambitious, often government-sponsored, programmes aimed at preventing and controlling salmonellosis in for instance, poultry production represent one alternative to lower salmonellosis-related illness and economic costs. On the other hand, such comprehensive programmes are rather resource-demanding. From the economic point of view the key problem is to find the optimal level for prophylactic measures. The purpose of this study is to compare two different approaches to preventing poultry-borne salmonellosis among humans. We identify and compare the economic costs of illness due to poultry-borne salmonellosis and the costs of salmonella control in England and Wales and Sweden, respectively. An alternative option is then introduced: the concept of competitive exclusion (CE). Our results show that the cost of illness constitutes the major part of the total cost in England and Wales, whereas in Sweden, the control cost amounts to 95% of the total cost. By using the CE concept, the cost of illness due to poultry-borne salmonellosis in England and Wales could be reduced by at least GB pound 12.6 million. These advantages apply to individuals, producers, and to society, and we thus conclude that the CE concept is a very cost-effective way of using scarce resources.


Subject(s)
Chickens/microbiology , Poultry Diseases/economics , Salmonella Food Poisoning/economics , Salmonella Infections, Animal/economics , Animals , Antibiosis , Costs and Cost Analysis , England , Food Microbiology , Humans , Meat/microbiology , Poultry Diseases/prevention & control , Salmonella Food Poisoning/prevention & control , Salmonella Infections, Animal/prevention & control , Sweden , Wales
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...