Proteomic Characterization of Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas With EWSR1 and CIC::DUX4 Translocations Reveals Diverging Tumor Biology and Distinct Diagnostic Markers.

Undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas (USRS) of bone and soft tissue are a group of tumors with heterogenic genomic alterations sharing similar morphology. In the present study, we performed a comparative large-scale proteomic analysis of USRS (n = 42) with diverse genomic translocations including classic Ewing sarcomas with EWSR1::FLI1 fusions (n = 24) or EWSR1::ERG fusions (n = 4), sarcomas with an EWSR1 rearrangement (n = 2), CIC::DUX4 fusion (n = 8), as well as tumors classified as USRS with no genetic data available (n = 4). Proteins extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded pretherapeutic biopsies were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively using shotgun mass spectrometry (MS). More than 8000 protein groups could be quantified using data-independent acquisition. Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis based on proteomic data allowed stratification of the 42 cases into distinct groups reflecting the different molecular genotypes. Protein signatures that significantly correlated with the respective genomic translocations were identified and used to generate a heatmap of all 42 sarcomas with assignment of cases with unknown molecular genetic data to either the EWSR1- or CIC-rearranged groups. MS-based prediction of sarcoma subtypes was molecularly confirmed in 2 cases where next-generation sequencing was technically feasible. MS also detected proteins routinely used in the immunohistochemical approach for the differential diagnosis of USRS. BCL11B highly expressed in Ewing sarcomas, and BACH2 as well as ETS-1 highly expressed in CIC::DUX4-associated sarcomas, were among proteins identified by the present proteomic study, and were chosen for immunohistochemical confirmation of MS data in our study cohort. Differential expressions of these 3 markers in the 2 genetic groups were further validated in an independent cohort of n = 34 USRS. Finally, our proteomic results point toward diverging signaling pathways in the different USRS subgroups.

Differential cyclin-E1 expression in CIC-rearranged sarcoma.

CIC-rearranged sarcoma (CRS) is a group of high-grade undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas examined as a separate entity in the current WHO classification; since it shows more aggressive clinical behavior and distinct morphological and molecular features compared to Ewing sarcoma (ES). As CCNE1 expression is associated with tumor growth in CIC::DUX4 sarcomas, we aimed to demonstrate the value of cyclin E1 expression in CRS. Cyclin E1 immunohistochemistry and break-apart FISH for EWSR1 and CIC gene rearrangements were performed on 3-mm tissue microarrays composed of 40 small round cell tumors. Five cases were classified as CRS, whereas 22 were ES and 13 were unclassified (EWSR1-/CIC-). Among all three diagnostic groups, we found cyclin E1 expression level to be higher in CRS (80 %) and unclassified groups (61.5 %) compared to ES (4.5 %, p < 0.001). In addition, high cyclin E1 expression levels were associated with higher mean age at diagnosis, presence of atypical histology and myxoid stroma, low CD99 expression, and presence of metastasis at diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity of high cyclin E1 expression in detecting non-ES cases were 95.5 % and 66.7 %, respectively. However, the correlation between cyclin E1 expression level and survival was not statistically significant. This is the first study that shows cyclin E1 immunohistochemical expression in EWSR1-negative undifferentiated small cell sarcomas, particularly CRS.

Small cell osteosarcoma versus fusion-driven round cell sarcomas of bone: retrospective clinical, radiological, pathological, and (epi)genetic comparison with clinical implications.

Small cell osteosarcoma (SCOS), a variant of conventional high-grade osteosarcoma (COS), may mimic fusion-driven round cell sarcomas (FDRCS) by overlapping clinico-radiological and histomorphological/immunohistochemical characteristics, hampering accurate diagnosis and consequently proper therapy. We retrospectively analyzed decalcified formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of 18 bone tumors primarily diagnosed as SCOS by methylation profiling, fusion gene analysis, and immunohistochemistry.In eight cases, the diagnosis of SCOS was maintained, and in 10 cases it was changed into FDRCS, including three Ewing sarcomas (EWSR1::FLI1 in two cases and no identified fusion gene in the third case), two sarcomas with BCOR alterations (KMT2D::BCOR, CCNB3::BCOR, respectively), three mesenchymal chondrosarcomas (HEY1::NCOA2 in two cases and one case with insufficient RNA quality), and two sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcomas (FUS::CREBL3 and EWSR1 rearrangement, respectively).Histologically, SCOS usually possessed more pleomorphic cells in contrast to the FDRCS showing mainly monomorphic cellular features. However, osteoid was seen in the latter tumors as well, often associated with slight pleomorphism. Also, the immunohistochemical profile (CD99, SATB2, and BCOR) overlapped.Clinically and radiologically, similarities between SCOS and FDRCS were observed, with by imaging only minimal presence or lack of (mineralized) osteoid in most of the SCOSs.In conclusion, discrimination of SCOS, epigenetically related to COS, versus FDRCS of bone can be challenging but is important due to different biology and therefore therapeutic strategies. Methylation profiling is a reliable and robust diagnostic test especially on decalcified FFPE material. Subsequent fusion gene analysis and/or use of specific immunohistochemical surrogate markers can be used to substantiate the diagnosis.

Spontaneous expression of the CIC::DUX4 fusion oncoprotein from a conditional allele potently drives sarcoma formation in genetically engineered mice.

CIC::DUX4 sarcoma (CDS) is a rare but highly aggressive undifferentiated small round cell sarcoma driven by a fusion between the tumor suppressor Capicua (CIC) and DUX4. Currently, there are no effective treatments and efforts to identify and translate better therapies are limited by the scarcity of patient tumor samples and cell lines. To address this limitation, we generated three genetically engineered mouse models of CDS (Ch7CDS, Ai9CDS, and TOPCDS). Remarkably, chimeric mice from all three conditional models developed spontaneous soft tissue tumors and disseminated disease in the absence of Cre-recombinase. The penetrance of spontaneous (Cre-independent) tumor formation was complete irrespective of bi-allelic Cic function and the distance between adjacent loxP sites. Characterization of soft tissue and presumed metastatic tumors showed that they consistently expressed the CIC::DUX4 fusion protein and many downstream markers of the disease credentialing the models as CDS. In addition, tumor-derived cell lines were generated and ChIP-seq was preformed to map fusion-gene specific binding using an N-terminal HA epitope tag. These datasets, along with paired H3K27ac ChIP-sequencing maps, validate CIC::DUX4 as a neomorphic transcriptional activator. Moreover, they are consistent with a model where ETS family transcription factors are cooperative and redundant drivers of the core regulatory circuitry in CDS.

Machine Learning-Supported Diagnosis of Small Blue Round Cell Sarcomas Using Targeted RNA Sequencing.

Small blue round cell sarcomas (SBRCSs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with overlapping morphologic features but markedly varying prognosis. They are characterized by distinct chromosomal alterations, particularly rearrangements leading to gene fusions, whose detection currently represents the most reliable diagnostic marker. Ewing sarcomas are the most common SBRCSs, defined by gene fusions involving EWSR1 and transcription factors of the ETS family, and the most frequent non-EWSR1-rearranged SBRCSs harbor a CIC rearrangement. Unfortunately, currently the identification of CIC::DUX4 translocation events, the most common CIC rearrangement, is challenging. Here, we present a machine-learning approach to support SBRCS diagnosis that relies on gene expression profiles measured via targeted sequencing. The analyses on a curated cohort of 69 soft-tissue tumors showed markedly distinct expression patterns for SBRCS subgroups. A random forest classifier trained on Ewing sarcoma and CIC-rearranged cases predicted probabilities of being CIC-rearranged >0.9 for CIC-rearranged-like sarcomas and <0.6 for other SBRCSs. Testing on a retrospective cohort of 1335 routine diagnostic cases identified 15 candidate CIC-rearranged tumors with a probability >0.75, all of which were supported by expert histopathologic reassessment. Furthermore, the multigene random forest classifier appeared advantageous over using high ETV4 expression alone, previously proposed as a surrogate to identify CIC rearrangement. Taken together, the expression-based classifier can offer valuable support for SBRCS pathologic diagnosis.

Updates on WHO classification for small round cell tumors: Ewing sarcoma vs. everything else.

The WHO Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours currently recognizes four categories of undifferentiated small round cell sarcoma: Ewing sarcoma, round cell sarcoma with EWSR1-non-ETS fusions including NFATc2 and PATZ1, CIC-rearranged sarcoma, and sarcoma with BCOR genetic alterations. These neoplasms frequently pose significant diagnostic challenges due to rarity and overlapping morphologic and immunohistochemical findings. Further, molecular testing, with accompanying pitfalls, may be needed to establish a definitive diagnosis. This review summarizes the clinical, histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of these neoplasms. In addition, differential diagnosis and areas of uncertainty and ongoing investigation are discussed.

CIC-Rearranged Sarcoma.

CIC-rearranged sarcoma is a rare type of small round cell sarcoma. The tumors often affect the deep soft tissues of patients in a wide age range. They are highly aggressive, respond poorly to chemotherapy, and have a worse outcome than Ewing sarcoma. CIC-rearranged sarcoma has characteristic and recognizable histology, including lobulated growth, focal myxoid changes, round to epithelioid cells, and minimal variation of nuclear size and shape. Nuclear ETV4 and WT1 expression are useful immunohistochemical findings. CIC fusion can be demonstrated using various methods; however, even next-generation sequencing suffers from imperfect sensitivity, especially for CIC::DUX4.

Renal CIC-LEUTX rearranged sarcoma with multiple pulmonary metastases: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: CIC-rearranged sarcomas (CRS) are a group of heterogeneous tumors which mostly occur in the soft tissues of limbs and trunk, and are highly invasive with poor prognosis. Here, we describe a rare case of CRS that occurred in the left kidney with a CIC-LEUTX rearrangement. CASE PRESENTATION: A 45-year-old male was admitted to hospital with a dry cough for more than two months without obvious cause. Physical examination and laboratory tests revealed no notable abnormality. The CT scan demonstrated a mass in the left kidney and multiple nodules in both lungs. The percutaneous core needle biopsy showed similar histomorphology and immunophenotype of small round cell malignant tumors. Genetic test revealed a CIC-LEUTX gene fusion. CONCLUSIONS: We present a rare primary renal CRS with multiple pulmonary metastases, and LEUTX is confirmed as the fusion partner of CIC gene for the first time in a renal case.

A Practical Approach to Small Round Cell Tumors Involving the Gastrointestinal Tract and Abdomen.

Small round cell neoplasms are diagnostically challenging owing to their clinical and pathologic overlap, necessitating use of large immunopanels and molecular analysis. Ewing sarcomas (ES) are the most common, but EWSR1 is translocated in several diverse neoplasms, some with round cell morphology. Molecular advances enable classification of many tumors previously termed 'atypical ES'. The current WHO Classification includes two new undifferentiated round cell sarcomas (with CIC or BCOR alterations), and a group of sarcomas in which EWSR1 partners with non-Ewing family transcription factor genes. This article reviews the spectrum of small round cell sarcomas within the gastrointestinal tract and abdomen.

[Clinical and morphological characteristics of Ewing's sarcoma and the algorithm for diagnosing undifferentiated round cell sarcomas]. / Kliniko-morfologicheskaya kharakteristika sarkomy Yuinga i algoritm diagnostiki nedifferentsirovannykh kruglokletochnykh sarkom.

BACKGROUND: The group of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas, according to the World Health Organization Classification, in addition to Ewing's sarcoma (ES), includes round cell sarcoma with rearrangement of the EWSR1 gene with partners not from the ETS gene family, sarcoma with BCOR gene alterations, CIC -rearranged sarcoma. Despite the fact that all tumors have clear histological and immunological criteria, their diagnosis can be difficult, given the fact that there are overlapping variants of the morphological picture and immunophenotype both within the group and with other round cell tumors. OBJECTIVE: Present a comparative analysis of genetically verified ES, sarcoma with BCOR gene alterations and CIC-rearranged sarcoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comparative study of biopsy specimens of bones, soft tissues and internal organs was carried out in 118 patients with ES, 10 with BCOR gene alterations and 8 with CIC-rearranged sarcomas. All cases were genetically verified. The following research methods were used: histological, immunohistochemical, RT-PCR, RNA sequencing and FISH. RESULTS: Within our cohort, it was shown that ES predominantly affects bones, while soft tissue localization is more typical for the other two undifferentiated round cell sarcomas. Histologically, in the overwhelming majority of cases, ES is characterized by a monomorphic round-cell structure; on the contrary, heterogeneous structure is typical for sarcoma with alterations of the BCOR gene, CIC-rearranged sarcoma. High sensitivity and specificity of CD99/NKX2.2 co-expression for ES, BCOR/SATB2/TLE1 for sarcoma with BCOR gene alterations, high specificity and low sensitivity of WT1/ETV4 co-expression for CIC-rearranged sarcoma was shown. CONCLUSION: For the differential diagnosis of undifferentiated round-cell sarcomas, it is necessary to take into account the clinical, morphology when compared with the data of the IHC study, and verification by molecular genetic methods is necessary to improve the accuracy of diagnosis.

[CIC-rearranged sarcoma: a case report and literature review]. / CIC-perestroennaya sarkoma: klinicheskoe nablyudenie i obzor literatury.

CIC-rearranged sarcoma is a rare and extremely aggressive tumor that occurs mainly in soft tissues. Despite the fact that identification of a characteristic genetic rearrangement is necessary to verify the diagnosis, in most cases, the correct diagnosis can be made by comparing histological signs and a characteristic immunophenotype, which greatly speeds up the diagnosis. The article describes a case of CIC-rearranged sarcoma in a 14-year girl with the successful application of the CWS-2009 treatment protocol.

Clinicopathological features of five cases of CIC::DUX4 positive sarcomas, including literature review.

According to the recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification, CIC-rearranged sarcomas, including CIC::DUX4-positive sarcomas constitute an aggressive subtype of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas. There is a single study on these tumors from our subcontinent. We present clinicopathological features of 5 additional cases of this tumor entity, including literature review. Thirty-nine undifferentiated round cell sarcomas, excluding Ewing sarcomas (ES), were tested for CIC::DUX4 fusion, including Type I (165 base pair size) and II (230 bp) by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Twenty-five of those tumors were tested for EWSR1 gene rearrangement, 5 for SS18 and 4 for SS18::SSX fusion, and were negative for those tests. Five tumors (12.8 %) were positive for CIC::DUX4(Type II) fusion. Five CIC:: DUX4-positive sarcomas occurred in 4 males and one female; of 25-43 years of age, in soft tissues, including thigh (n = 2), chest wall (n = 1), iliac region (n = 1) and foot (n = 1). Tumor size varied from 2.2 to 19 cm. Microscopically, the tumors were predominantly composed of nodules and sheets of malignant round to epithelioid cells, including "rhabdoid-like" (n = 2) and spindle-shaped (n = 2) with eosinophilic to vacuolated cytoplasm (4/5), distinct nucleoli (4/5), brisk mitoses, focal myxoid to hyalinised stroma (4/5) and necrosis (5/5). Immunohistochemically, tumor cells were positive for WT1 (5/5), calretinin (3/4), pan-keratin (1/4), CD99/MIC2 ("dot-like" to cytoplasmic membranous) (4/4), while negative for desmin (0/4), S100P (0/4), and NKX2.2 (0/5). INI1/SMARCB1 was retained (3/3). All patients underwent excision with adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy (Ewing sarcoma regimen). A single patient developed recurrence, and 2 developed pulmonary metastasis, including one with brain metastasis. CIC:: DUX4-positive sarcomas are ultra-rare tumors, that mainly occur in the soft tissues and in young adult patients. Histopathologically, these tumors display a wide spectrum, including round to epithelioid cells, variable amount of cytoplasmic vacuolization and myxoid stroma with necrosis. Immunohistochemically, these tumors express WT1 and calretinin. Despite adjuvant therapies, these tumors have dismal outcomes, especially in large-sized tumors. CIC::DUX4-positive sarcomas need to be differentiated from their histopathological mimics, including ES, in view of significant treatment-related implications.

CIC-rearranged sarcoma presenting with superior vena cava syndrome: case report.

CIC-rearranged sarcomas are rare mesenchymal neoplasms belonging to the family of undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas. This report details the case of a 45-year-old man presenting with symptoms of mediastinal compression, radiological diagnosis of a mediastinal mass and rapid evolution to full-blown superior vena cava syndrome. The emergency was successfully managed with a pharmacological approach. Formulation of a pathological diagnosis of CIC-rearranged sarcoma was initially supported by fluorescence in situ hybridisation findings and later validated by next-generation sequencing, which showed CIC-DUX4 gene fusion. A chemotherapy regimen was started with immediate benefits for the patient. The spectrum of pathological entities able to cause superior vena cava syndrome is wide, and recognition of rare causes is important to tailor the therapeutic approach to the specific disease. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first report of CIC-rearranged sarcoma presenting with superior vena cava syndrome.

Expanding the Molecular Diversity of CIC-Rearranged Sarcomas With Novel and Very Rare Partners.

Capicua transcriptional repressor (CIC)-rearranged sarcoma represents a distinct pathologic entity and constitutes the second most prevalent category of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas (URCSs) after Ewing sarcoma. The 2 most common translocations are t(4;19) and t(10;19), resulting in CIC fusions with either DUX4 and DUX4L paralog, respectively; however, other rare variant fusions have also been reported. In this study, we expand the molecular spectrum of CIC-gene partners, reporting on 5 cases of URCSs showing CIC fusions with AXL, CITED1, SYK, and LEUTX by targeted RNA or DNA sequencing. There were 4 female patients and 1 male patient with a wide age range (12-70 years; median, 36 years). Four cases occurred in the deep soft tissues (lower extremity, 3; neck, 1) and 1 case in the central nervous system (midbrain/thalamus). All cases showed similar histologic findings within the spectrum of URCSs. Immunohistochemistry, showed variable positivity for ETV4 in 4 of the 4 cases and positive results for ERG in 3 of the 4 cases and for WT1 in 1 of the 4 cases. CD31 showed positivity in 2 of the 3 cases, including one coexpressing ERG. Unsupervised clustering of methylation profiles by T-distributed stochastic neighborhood embedding performed in 4 cases showed that all clustered tightly together and along the CIC sarcoma methylation class. RNA-sequencing data showed consistent upregulation of ETV1 and ETV4 mRNA in all cases examined, at similar levels to CIC::DUX4 URCSs. Our study expands the molecular diversity of CIC-rearranged URCSs to include novel and rare partners, providing morphologic, immunohistochemical, gene expression, and methylation evidence supporting their classification within the family of tumors harboring the more common DUX4/DUX4L partner genes.

A global collaboRAtive study of CIC-rearranged, BCOR::CCNB3-rearranged and other ultra-rare unclassified undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas (GRACefUl).

BACKGROUND: Undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas (URCSs) represent a diagnostic challenge, and their optimal treatment is unknown. We aimed to define the clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome of URCS patients. METHODS: URCS patients treated from 1983 to 2019 at 21 worldwide sarcoma reference centres were retrospectively identified. Based on molecular assessment, cases were classified as follows: (1) CIC-rearranged round cell sarcomas, (2) BCOR::CCNB3-rearranged round cell sarcomas, (3) unclassified URCSs. Treatment, prognostic factors and outcome were reviewed. RESULTS: In total, 148 patients were identified [88/148 (60%) CIC-rearranged sarcoma (median age 32 years, range 7-78), 33/148 (22%) BCOR::CCNB3-rearranged (median age 17 years, range 5-91), and 27/148 (18%) unclassified URCSs (median age 37 years, range 4-70)]. One hundred-one (68.2%) cases presented with localised disease; 47 (31.8%) had metastases at diagnosis. Male prevalence, younger age, bone primary site, and a low rate of synchronous metastases were observed in BCOR::CCNB3-rearranged cases. Local treatment was surgery in 67/148 (45%) patients, and surgery + radiotherapy in 52/148 (35%). Chemotherapy was given to 122/148 (82%) patients. At a 42.7-month median follow-up, the 3-year overall survival (OS) was 92.2% (95% CI 71.5-98.0) in BCOR::CCNB3 patients, 39.6% (95% CI 27.7-51.3) in CIC-rearranged sarcomas, and 78.7% in unclassified URCSs (95% CI 56.1-90.6; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest conducted in URCS and confirms major differences in outcomes between URCS subtypes. A full molecular assessment should be undertaken when a diagnosis of URCS is suspected. Prospective studies are needed to better define the optimal treatment strategy in each URCS subtype.