Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 40
Filter
1.
Clin Exp Dent Res ; 5(4): 356-364, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31452947

ABSTRACT

The current Spanish curricula for degrees in dentistry include conscious sedation (CS) as a basic training competency. However, is the CS training delivered by Spanish dental schools a consensus-based educational framework enabling students to use this anesthetic technique after graduation? To answer this research question, a study was designed aiming to identify the strategies used to teach this competency in Spanish dental schools and the characteristics of teaching. The authors reviewed legislation concerning officially established requirements for a degree in dentistry as well as curricula currently taught in Spain. Our analysis identified clear discrepancies among the schools of dentistry studied. The only overlap was observed in reference to the level of proficiency imparted, which prevents Spanish dentistry students from using this anesthetic technique after graduation. Specific features of the normative framework and of the Spanish legislative system underlying the design of the present curricula of degrees in dentistry would explain the discrepancies in CS competencies taught at our schools of dentistry. Almost 10 years since its implementation and in light of the new demands of the complex society in which we live, Spanish universities must unify their educational criteria regarding CS training to ensure the appropriate qualification of our new dentists in this technique.


Subject(s)
Accreditation/standards , Clinical Competence/standards , Conscious Sedation , Education, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Schools, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Competence/legislation & jurisprudence , Curriculum/standards , Curriculum/statistics & numerical data , Curriculum/trends , Education, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Education, Dental/standards , Education, Dental/trends , Humans , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Schools, Dental/standards , Schools, Dental/trends , Spain
2.
J Dent Educ ; 82(9): 949-960, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30173191

ABSTRACT

One approach to enhancing quality care outcomes and patient safety is through effective implementation of clinical risk reduction strategies. Clinical risk identification at The Ohio State University College of Dentistry revealed lack of a standardized informed consenting process for patients. The purpose of this project was to develop and implement a uniform college-wide informed consenting process. An operating procedure was also developed. The resulting consenting documents used a uniform approach in which clinics could use a basic readable and processable informed consent template. The template was edited for appropriate content suitable for an electronic health record. Implementing an operating procedure along with associated contemporary uniform electronic informed consent forms was realized through efforts of a core team with informed consenting experience. The core team developed the template and the majority of all documents before editing all division-based consents. This method relied on growing expertise and momentum. Outcomes of chart audits following implementation of the new electronic informed consent forms showed a transitory increase in missing consent forms. Subsequently, the number of missing consent forms decreased to near pre-implementation levels. Patient refunds related to missing informed consent issues dropped, and patient satisfaction remained high throughout the project. Other institutions can use this project as a guide for developing their own uniform consent forms and process.


Subject(s)
Informed Consent , Schools, Dental/organization & administration , Consent Forms , Humans , Informed Consent/standards , Ohio , Program Development , Risk Management/methods , Risk Management/organization & administration , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence
3.
J Dent Educ ; 80(6): 691-6, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27251351

ABSTRACT

A person's right to access his or her protected health information is a core feature of the U.S. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule. If the information is stored electronically, covered entities must be able to provide patients with some type of machine-readable, electronic copy of their data. The aim of this study was to understand how academic dental institutions execute the Privacy Rule's right of access in the context of electronic health records (EHRs). A validated electronic survey was distributed to the clinical deans of 62 U.S. dental schools during a two-month period in 2014. The response rate to the survey was 53.2% (N=33). However, three surveys were partially completed, and of the 30 completed surveys, the 24 respondents who reported using axiUm as the EHR at their dental school clinic were the ones on which the results were based (38.7% of total schools at the time). Of the responses analyzed, 86% agreed that clinical modules should be considered part of a patient's dental record, and all agreed that student teaching-related modules should not. Great variability existed among these clinical deans as to whether administrative and financial modules should be considered part of a patient record. When patients request their records, close to 50% of responding schools provide the information exclusively on paper. This study found variation among dental schools in their implementation of the Privacy Rule right of access, and although all the respondents had adopted EHRs, a large number return records in paper format.


Subject(s)
Dental Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Electronic Health Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Access to Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Privacy , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act , Humans , United States
4.
J Dent Educ ; 78(11): 1558-67, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25362698

ABSTRACT

One of the ways dental education is changing the way it is preparing the next generation of learners is through efficient utilization of interactive social media. Social media, which facilitates interaction and sharing of new ideas, is being utilized to educate students, residents, and faculty. Unfortunately, as with most improvements in technology, there are growing pains. Faculty, student, and patient interaction on social media platforms, such as Facebook and Twitter, can lead to inappropriate or embarrassing situations. Striking the appropriate balance between free speech rights of students and faculty and the need for colleges and universities to have efficient operations is often left to the judicial system. The concepts of free speech and contract law and how each is applied in educational settings should be understood by students, faculty, and administrators. This article provides a review of legal cases that led to current social media policies, as well as present-day cases that exemplify the application of these principles, to help dental educators gain a greater understanding of the boundaries of protected speech. It also provides a set of sample guidelines for communicating through these media.


Subject(s)
Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Media/legislation & jurisprudence , Civil Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Communication , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Contracts/legislation & jurisprudence , Dentist-Patient Relations , Education, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Faculty, Dental , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Internet/legislation & jurisprudence , Interprofessional Relations , Learning , Policy Making , Social Networking , Students, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Supreme Court Decisions , United States
7.
Acta odontol. venez ; 52(2)2014. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-777798

ABSTRACT

Este estudio se realizó con el objetivo de conocer la forma en que se enseña cariología en las ocho facultades de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela. Vía internet se remitió un cuestionario a los decanos de las 5 facultades públicas y 3 privadas. Ellos decidieron que cátedras, departamentos o profesores las analizarían. Todas las facultades respondieron. Se encontró que 4 poseen un programa específico de cariología. El número de cátedras o departamentos responsables de su enseñanza osciló entre 2 y 5 cátedras o 1 y 4 departamentos. En 7 facultades los contenidos teóricos se dictan a partir del segundo año, en la restante, en el primer año. En 4 existe una preclínica. En una de ellas, el entrenamiento clínico en cariología comienza el primer año y abarca los cinco años de la carrera en el resto varía de cuatro años a un semestre. Las lesiones cervicales no cariosas se incluyen en el programa de cariología en 6 facultades, y los defectos del desarrollo de la estructura dentaria en 5. En relación a la creación de un currículo común para las facultades de la nación venezolana así como para el área andina o Iberoamérica no se determinó consenso en todas las opciones.


In order to get acquainted how cariology for undergraduate is taught at all 8 dental schools in the República Bolivariana de Venezuela, a questionnaire was send to the deans. All schools responded to the request for information. The results indicated that 4 schools have a specific curriculum in cariology. The academic units involved oscillate between 2 and 5 cathedras or 1 to 5 departments. Theoretical education is delivered by all schools, 7 of them begin it at the second academic year, and one considers it all along the 5 years undergraduate training. In regards to a common cariology curriculum for the country, spanish speaking Latinamerican countries, or the Andean countries no consensus was detected.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Dental Caries , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Educational Measurement/standards , Curriculum , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Rev. esp. med. legal ; 39(4): 149-156, oct.-dic. 2013.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-116894

ABSTRACT

Pese a que es difícil disponer de datos concretos sobre casuísticas de reclamaciones legales contra los dentistas, ya que los datos están muy fragmentados y son poco accesibles, disponemos de series como los datos del Colegio de Odontólogos y Estomatólogos de la I Región, que recoge todas las reclamaciones de los pacientes motivadas por una atención odontológica presentadas ante la Comisión Deontológica del Colegio. También disponemos de series de datos sobre sentencias judiciales debidas a reclamaciones sanitarias analizadas anteriormente en estudios de la Escuela de Medicina Legal de Madrid. Según los datos derivados de estas series, es evidente que la presión legal de los pacientes está incrementando. Así es y así será en el futuro, incluso de forma más acusada. Debemos por tanto, asumirlo e intentar adoptar las medidas que minimicen este riesgo, o limiten sus consecuencias en caso de producirse. ste es el objetivo principal del presente estudio (AU)


It is difficult to provide specific data on of legal claims against dentists on a case-by-case basis due to the data being highly fragmented and not usually accessible. However, we do have available data series, such as the one from the College of Dentistry and Stomatology of Region I, which includes all patient claims motivated by a dental care submitted to the College's Ethics Committee. We also have data series relating to court judgments due to health care claims that had been previously discussed on studies carried out by the School of Legal Medicine of Madrid.Based on data derived therefrom, it is clear that the legal pressure of patients is increasing. This is how it is and how it will be in the future, perhaps even more sharply. We must therefore accept it and try to adopt measures that minimize this risk or limit its consequences, should they occur (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Schools, Dental/organization & administration , Dentistry/organization & administration , Dentistry/standards , Ethics, Dental , Legislation, Dental/organization & administration , Legislation, Dental/standards , Legislation, Dental , Health Services Needs and Demand/legislation & jurisprudence , Legislation, Dental/ethics , Legislation, Dental/trends , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Malpractice/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Liability/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance, Liability/standards , Insurance, Liability
9.
J Dent Educ ; 74(10 Suppl): S110-120, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20930220

ABSTRACT

Academic enrichment programs can be essential to efforts by dental schools to recruit and enroll underrepresented minority students (URM). Many summer academic enrichment programs provide additional preparation and support to URM students in the sciences. They often address barriers to student achievement such as unevenness in academic preparation, less rigorous educational background, family influence on preparation aspiration and success, unease in a new setting, and lack of professional role models. To be successful, these programs must address both the academic and social complexities of URM students and often require a range of programs to meet the specific needs of different student groups.


Subject(s)
Community Dentistry/education , Curriculum , Education, Dental/methods , Minority Groups/education , School Admission Criteria , Schools, Dental/organization & administration , Students, Dental , Civil Rights , Cultural Diversity , Educational Status , Ethnicity/education , Foundations , Humans , Indians, North American , Nebraska , North Carolina , Organizational Policy , Public Policy , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Science/education , Students, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Texas , United States , Wisconsin
11.
J Dent Educ ; 73(1): 127-32, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19126773

ABSTRACT

This article reports the findings of a survey-based study conducted to determine U.S. dental schools' institutional protocols regarding the practice of students' administering local anesthetic injections to fellow students as part of their process of learning this skill. The majority of schools ask students to practice local anesthetic injections on each other without obtaining informed consent.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiology/education , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Education, Dental , Ethics , Informed Consent , Morals , Students, Dental , Anesthesiology/ethics , Anesthesiology/legislation & jurisprudence , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Education, Dental/ethics , Education, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Injections , Schools, Dental/ethics , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Students, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Teaching/methods , United States
13.
J Dent Educ ; 70(10): 1023-37, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17021281

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to provide descriptive data on the presence of dental schools, dental school graduates, instate enrollment, and interstate dental education agreements for U.S. states, districts, and regions. This information may be helpful in deciding to open or maintain a dental school. Data from the American Dental Association (ADA), American Dental Education Association (ADEA), and U.S. Census Bureau were used to conduct cross-sectional comparisons for states, census divisions, and regions for 2000. In 2000, there were fifty-four dental schools in thirty-two states and the District of Columbia. Total graduation across 1990-2000 was 43,289 dentists. Over half (56 percent) of the graduates were from public schools. The distribution of schools and graduates differed by geographic region. Alaska, Utah, Hawaii, and Nebraska were outliers with respect to high and low numbers of dental schools in states, in-state enrollment, and dentists to population. U.S. states, districts, and regions vary widely on the number of dental schools, dentists to population, first-year dental school enrollees, and dental school graduates. Further assessment on additional factors such as dental health provider shortage areas, state oral health status, and attractiveness of locations to dentists is needed to more fully understand the impact of these factors.


Subject(s)
Dentists/statistics & numerical data , Education, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Students, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Censuses , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dentists/supply & distribution , Female , Humans , Male , Population Density , Private Sector/statistics & numerical data , Public Sector/statistics & numerical data , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Schools, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , United States
15.
J Dent Educ ; 68(9): 932-7, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15342653

ABSTRACT

In June 2003 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of using race as a factor in higher education admissions decisions. This article considers the impact of the Supreme Court decisions on admissions procedures at selected academic dental institutions (ADI) and their parent institutions. We interviewed fifty-eight leaders considered to be individual stakeholders at seven ADI and their related parent institutions, state dental associations, and state legislatures using a common set of questions about the Supreme Court decisions. Educators from the ADI and their parent institutions were consistent in their responses that the rulings upheld affirmative action as necessary to achieve diversity. State organized dentistry officials did not appear to be as aware as others of the rulings, whereas legislators were mixed in their responses. Except for the University of Michigan undergraduate admissions procedures, it remains to be seen what the impact will be for other higher education institutions and for academic dental institutions. Although the rulings have provided guidelines for achieving diversity using race/ ethnicity as one of several factors, the rulings will possibly be challenged, thus requiring vigilance on the part of parent institutions and their ADI to ensure compliance with the spirit of the rulings and to avoid attack from opponents of affirmative action.


Subject(s)
Minority Groups/legislation & jurisprudence , Prejudice , School Admission Criteria , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Supreme Court Decisions , Attitude , Civil Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Cultural Diversity , Ethnicity/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Michigan , Racial Groups/legislation & jurisprudence , United States , Universities/legislation & jurisprudence
16.
J Hist Dent ; 51(1): 41-5, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12641173

ABSTRACT

Old as the ills of mankind, dentistry has been practiced as a specialty of surgery by physicians, surgeons, and artisans, at various times with titles such as barber surgeon, toothdrawer, operator for the teeth, and surgeon dentist. There being universal need for dental services, and lacking enforceable standards of practice and qualification, the profession was invaded by dubiously prepared pretenders at practice. The unconscionable consequence remained largely unremedied until realization of a philosophically sound basis of professional literature, organization, and education incident to the institution of the first dental college and the American system of dental education that elevated dentistry to the status of a recognized autonomous profession.


Subject(s)
Education, Dental/history , Schools, Dental/history , Baltimore , History, 19th Century , Maryland , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Societies, Dental/history
17.
J Dent Educ ; 66(5): 624-33, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12056767

ABSTRACT

Certain health care organizations, including dental schools, should be readying themselves to comply with the numerous requirements described within the administrative simplification section of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). The intent of administrative simplification is to streamline the management of health care transactions while protecting the privacy of certain written, oral, and electronic patient information. There are no field-tested plans for implementing the law because only recently has the health care industry begun to respond to the multitude of requirements. It is essential that each organization create a customized compliance plan that best fits its structure and needs. The purpose of this paper is to propose a five-stage theoretical strategy that could assist a dental school in achieving HIPAA compliance. The first stage involves the selection of a HIPAA task force. The second stage selects the applicable HIPAA requirements, determines the current states of confidentiality and security, manages the electronic transactions standards, and composes a gap analysis. The third stage examines risk analysis and management. The fourth stage encompasses technical modifications, policies and procedures, legal input, and training. The fifth stage addresses the maintenance of the implementation.


Subject(s)
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act/organization & administration , Schools, Dental/organization & administration , Advisory Committees/legislation & jurisprudence , Advisory Committees/organization & administration , Computer Security/legislation & jurisprudence , Computer Security/standards , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Sector/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Sector/organization & administration , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Inservice Training , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/organization & administration , Policy Making , Program Evaluation , Risk Assessment , Risk Management , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
18.
Aust Dent J ; 45(2): 125-30, 2000 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10925509

ABSTRACT

Among the many challenges that face modern dental schools is the development of appropriate assessment systems. The more litigious nature of modern education makes it important that the systems developed are transparent and can withstand the processes of legal challenge. Coupled with this demand for robust assessment is a growing demand from universities and health providers for dental schools to keep rigorous records of student clinical productivity. This brief review outlines a system developed at the School of Oral Health Sciences at the University of Western Australia. The system integrates both qualitative and quantitative assessment and uses criterion-based assessment as its foundation. Detailed analysis and real-time reporting mechanisms using a suite of personally written software tools is now possible. The system provides both students and staff with effective data to enhance the learning process.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Dental , Educational Measurement/methods , Clinical Competence/legislation & jurisprudence , Competency-Based Education , Computer Systems , Education, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Educational Technology , Efficiency , Feedback , Forms and Records Control , Humans , Records , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Software , Students, Dental , Teaching/methods , Western Australia
19.
J Dent Educ ; 63(10): 766-71, 1999 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10572544

ABSTRACT

There are few guidelines available for dental school faculty and administrators in the management of hepatitis B e-antigen positive (HBeAg+) dental school applicants. It is apparent that this serostatus is unique and requires a different approach from that used for applicants with other infectious diseases, such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The issue is examined from a number of perspectives, including the science, policy, legal, and ethical considerations confronted in establishing a policy for the HBeAg+ dental school applicant.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B e Antigens/blood , School Admission Criteria , Schools, Dental , Students, Dental , Administrative Personnel , Communicable Diseases , Ethics, Professional , Faculty, Dental , Guidelines as Topic , HIV Infections , Health Policy , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis B/transmission , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Policy Making , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Schools, Dental/organization & administration
20.
J Dent Educ ; 63(9): 673-81, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10518204

ABSTRACT

Statutory law and court cases currently leave fair use of copyrighted material poorly defined and fail to provide effective guidance for the use of others' work. Copyright legislation is undergoing significant change, accelerated by the evolution of computing and communication technologies. This paper reviews copyright issues, fair use guidelines, and applicable laws and statutes to help administrators and educators understand and comply with copyright regulations. The paper describes principles of copyright and ownership, the rights of copyright holders, and the conditions under which copyrighted material can be used by others. Recently introduced legislation, such as the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act, may significantly affect how educators can use copyrighted material in the future. The integration of computer and communication technology into education raises a number of intellectual property issues for dental schools. This paper provides some general guidelines regarding copyright issues in academic environments.


Subject(s)
Copyright/legislation & jurisprudence , Education/legislation & jurisprudence , Information Science/legislation & jurisprudence , Communication , Education, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Educational Technology/legislation & jurisprudence , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Internet/legislation & jurisprudence , Ownership , Publishing/legislation & jurisprudence , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...