The 2020 breakthroughs in early secondary prevention: dual antiplatelet therapy versus single antiplatelet therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Single antiplatelet therapy represents an established treatment in secondary prevention of ischemic strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs). In contrast with coronary artery disease, the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for secondary prevention in patients with acute cerebral ischemia (ACI) remains under debate. In this narrative review, we present and analyse the most recent findings concerning the potential efficacy and safety of DAPT therapy after ischemic strokes or TIA. RECENT FINDINGS: Following the publication of the three (CHANCE, POINT and THALES) large, randomized-controlled, clinical trials (RCTs) that showed efficacy of early DAPT for the secondary prevention after minor AIS or TIA, short-term DAPT use is becoming the most prevalent choice of treatment. Notably, DAPT is even more popular after AIS attributed to large artery atherosclerosis given randomized data from small RCTs supporting the use of DAPT in patients with extracranial or intracranial atherosclerosis and microembolization detected by transcranial Doppler. Recent subanalysis of data from the randomized trials aim to identify specific patient subgroups, which are determined by genetic, imaging or clinical characteristics, and for whom DAPT appears to be more beneficial. The potential role of different antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor) is also discussed. SUMMARY: DAPT has recently proven its efficacy for the early secondary prevention of AIS patients with minor stroke severity and high-risk TIA patients. However, the length of DAPT is still controversial, as well as the individualized selection of AIS or TIA patients with the lower risk of bleeding and with the greater benefit in prevention of ischemic cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events.

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: An update.

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) provides life-saving therapy to prevent sudden cardiac death. ICDs have been implanted in millions of patients worldwide since the first human implant in 1980. Clinical trials have helped establish guidelines for ICD implantation in primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Recent trials have also tested and compared various programing strategies to avoid unnecessary shocks and improve survival among ICD recipients. ICDs may also assist with monitoring for heart failure management. In this review, we discuss the clinical science to date that has helped define the role of ICDs in current practice.

Clinical use of aspirin in ischemic heart disease: past, present and future.

Aspirin is an antiplatelet drug, inhibiting the cyclooxygenase activity of platelet prostaglandin H synthase-1 and almost complete suppressing platelet capacity to generate the prothrombotic and proatherogenic thromboxane A2. Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin reduces the risk of serious vascular events by about a quarter in patients who are at high risk because they already have occlusive vascular disease. However, the inhibition of thromboxane-dependent platelet function by aspirin is effective for the prevention of thrombosis, but is also associated with excess bleeding, although the absolute increase in major gastrointestinal or other major extracranial bleeds is an order of magnitude smaller. For secondary prevention of vascular events, the benefits of aspirin therapy substantially exceed the risks. Therefore, aspirin is a cornerstone of antithrombotic therapy in acute coronary syndromes, in chronic ischemic heart disease and in percutaneous coronary intervention. On the other hand, the role of aspirin in primary prevention remains uncertain and it is still debated, because the absolute risk of vascular complications is the major determinant of the absolute benefit of antiplatelet prophylaxis and the reduction in vascular events needs to be weighed against any increase in major bleeds. Future data from ongoing studies will help us to identify people at high vascular risk who take advantage from aspirin therapy for primary prevention or will indicate if specific category of high risk patients, like patients with diabetes, could be better protected from an increase in the frequency of aspirin administration.

The cardiovascular polypill in high-risk patients.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in both developed and developing countries. Adequate treatment of vascular risk factors, such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and systolic blood pressure are known to reduce the future risk of cardiovascular disease in these patients. However currently, large treatment gaps exist among high-risk individuals, in whom the guidelines recommend concomitant treatment with aspirin, statin, and blood-pressure lowering agents. Combining aspirin, cholesterol, and blood-pressure lowering agents into a single pill called the cardiovascular polypill has been proposed as complementary care in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases in both intermediate- and high-risk patient populations. It is now a decade since the first recommendations to develop and trial cardiovascular polypills. The major scientific debate has been about the appropriate initial target population. This review article focuses on the potential role of fixed-dose combination therapy in different patient populations, outlines the pros and cons of combination therapy, and emphasizes the rationale for trialing their use. Current and planned future cardiovascular polypill trials are summarized and the pre-requisites for implementation of the polypill strategy in both primary and secondary prevention are described. The recent development of combination pills containing off-patent medications holds promise for highly affordable and effective treatment and evidence is emerging on the use of this strategy in high-risk populations.