Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.230
Filter
1.
J Bus Contin Emer Plan ; 17(4): 363-374, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736157

ABSTRACT

Enterprise security risk management (ESRM) has continued to gain global acceptance as a management philosophy for the development and implementation of an enterprise-wide corporate security programme. As organisations continue to rebuild and recover from COVID-19, the value of assessing the resilience of an organisation through regular testing of its response to events has gained prominence. There are opportunities to link the development and implementation of a risk-based approach for designing a security programme, to assessing an organisation's resilience to future events. Organisations can benefit from the complementary approaches of ESRM and organisational resilience once the commonalities are identified and embraced. This paper expands upon the ESRM management approach, linking the concepts of ESRM to the design of a resilient enterprise.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disaster Planning , Risk Management , Risk Management/organization & administration , Humans , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Security Measures/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Commerce/organization & administration
2.
ACS Synth Biol ; 11(2): 522-527, 2022 02 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35176864

ABSTRACT

The ability to construct, synthesize, and edit genes and genomes at scale and with speed enables, in synergy with other tools of engineering biology, breakthrough applications with far-reaching implications for society. As SARS-CoV-2 spread around the world in early spring of 2020, researchers rapidly mobilized, using these tools in the development of diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines for COVID-19. The sharing of knowledge was crucial to making rapid progress. Several publications described the use of reverse genetics for the de novo construction of SARS-CoV-2 in the laboratory, one in the form of a protocol. Given the demonstrable harm caused by the virus, the unequal distribution of mitigating vaccines and therapeutics, their unknown efficacy against variants, and the interest in this research by laboratories unaccustomed to working with highly transmissible pandemic pathogens, there are risks associated with such publications, particularly as protocols. We describe considerations and offer suggestions for enhancing security in the publication of synthetic biology research and techniques. We recommend: (1) that protocol manuscripts for the de novo synthesis of certain pathogenic viruses undergo a mandatory safety and security review; (2) that if published, such papers include descriptions of the discussions or review processes that occurred regarding security considerations in the main text; and (3) the development of a governance framework for the inclusion of basic security screening during the publication process of engineering biology/synthetic biology manuscripts to build and support a safe and secure research enterprise that is able to maximize its positive impacts and minimize any negative outcomes.


Subject(s)
Bioengineering , Publishing , Security Measures/organization & administration , Genes, Viral , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Synthetic Biology
4.
Bol. malariol. salud ambient ; 61(3): 527-532, ago. 2021. tab.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIVECS | ID: biblio-1418408

ABSTRACT

Los trabajadores de la industria están expuestos a distintos tipos de riesgos, incluyendo la exposición laboral a agentes biológicos como virus, bacterias, hongos, parásitos, esporas o toxinas capaces de originar algún tipo de infección, enfermedad o toxicidad. Gran variedad de estos patógenos ha sido identificada sobre distintas superficies dentro de instalaciones de trabajo, persistiendo en algunos casos luego de las jornadas de limpieza habituales, e incluso sobreviviendo por largos períodos de tiempo. Los hallazgos preliminares indican que los procesos de higiene en dos industrias permitieron disminuir de manera estadísticamente significativa la presencia de E. Coli y Sars-Cov-2, en las superficies dentro de las instalaciones. Por el contrario, en una tercera industria se observó que los procesos de higiene y limpieza no lograron reducir eficazmente la presencia de los patógenos La auditoría de higiene en instalaciones de industrias textiles debe incluir la capacidad de hallar e identificar los peligros biológicos que aún estén presentes en superficies, una vez ejecutados los protocolos rutinarios de limpieza y desinfección establecidos por la organización. Para esta labor proponemos la práctica complementaria de tres procedimientos: la determinación microbiológica, mediante torundas o placas de contacto, la determinación visual con luz ultravioleta, para comprobar el grado de eficacia de la limpieza, y la determinación específica, consistente en la detección de ARN de virus SARS-CoV-2 (causante del COVID-19) en muestras ambientales de superficies por el método de PCR en tiempo real(AU)


Industrial workers are exposed to different types of risks, including occupational exposure to biological agents such as viruses, bacteria, fungi, parasites, spores or toxins capable of causing some type of infection, disease or toxicity. A great variety of these pathogens have been identified on different surfaces within work facilities, persisting in some cases after the usual cleaning days, and even surviving for long periods of time. Preliminary findings indicate that hygiene processes in two industries allowed a statistically significant decrease in the presence of E. Coli and Sars-Cov-2, on surfaces within the facilities. On the contrary, in a third industry it was observed that hygiene and cleaning processes failed to effectively reduce the presence of pathogens Hygiene audit in textile industry facilities should include the ability to find and identify biological hazards that are still present on surfaces, once the routine cleaning and disinfection protocols established by the organization have been executed. For this work, we propose the complementary practice of three procedures: microbiological determination, using swabs or contact plates, visual determination with ultraviolet light, to verify the degree of cleaning efficiency, and specific determination, consisting of RNA detection. of SARS-CoV-2 virus (causing COVID-19) in environmental samples of surfaces by the real-time PCR method(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Security Measures/organization & administration , Occupational Risks , Escherichia coli , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Peru , Textile Industry , Ultraviolet Rays , Disinfection , Occupational Exposure
5.
Int Marit Health ; 72(2): 99-109, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34212349

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since 2014, the number of migrants and refugees crossing the Mediterranean towards Europe has risen significantly due to various reasons. Both state agencies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have launched rescue missions in the Central Mediterranean in accordance with international legal obligations for search and rescue (SAR) operations for those under distress at sea. Our aim is to summarise the specific qualifications needed for maritime SAR in the Mediterranean both in terms of the population at risk, the equipment and the medical support required, especially during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the operational legal framework. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article aims to summarise the key points of SAR efforts from a medical perspective as depicted in the relevant literature during a specific timeline period (2014-2020) in a specific part of the Mediterranean Sea (Central Mediterranean route). Only papers published in English and whose full text was available were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were: a) articles referring to sea rescue operations between 2014 and 2020, b) research that focused on medical preparedness and assistance during rescue operations in the Central Mediterranean route, c) studies concerning demographic and clinical features of the rescue population, d) guidelines on the rule of conduct of persons and states participating in rescue activities. The exclusion criteria were: a) studies describing SAR operations in different regions of the world and b) studies focusing on routes, demographics and medical support of migrants/refugees on land. RESULTS: Three major themes were identified: a) characteristics of the population in distress at sea: country of origin, age groups, presence of communicable and non-communicable diseases were identified in the relevant literature. Our research shows that dermatological and respiratory issues were the major concerns among sea migrants, coming from different countries of both Africa and Asia, being relatively young and mostly males; b) medical preparedness and equipment needed for rescue: according to current guidelines, revised during the COVID-19 pandemic, infrastructure needed during SAR operations includes both equipment for resuscitation, personal protective equipment, deck adjustments, medical personnel trained to function in an austere setting and able to handle vulnerable patient groups such as children and pregnant women; c) medico-legal implications of SAR operations: knowledge of the legal framework encompassing SAR operations seems necessary, as European Union and state led initiatives seem to withdraw from proactive SAR, while criminalising NGO led rescue efforts. Operating with the imperative to save lives seems to be the only way of respecting international law and human values, thus, a summary of what the law dictates was made in an effort to keep medical workers participating in such operations updated. CONCLUSIONS: Investigation aims to shed light on the special clinical features of sea migrants, the skills, equipment and organizational structure needed by medical workers participating in SAR operations as well as the legal framework under which they will be asked to operate. Special consideration will be given to the difficulties that emerged due to the COVD-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Relief Work/organization & administration , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Mediterranean Sea , Security Measures/organization & administration , Socioeconomic Factors
7.
Health Secur ; 19(3): 254-261, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33956522

ABSTRACT

Rapidly advancing biotechnological research and easy access to biological information have created challenges for preventing their intentional misuse. Because of the dedicated efforts of science and policy leaders in Pakistan, the country is on the road to becoming a regional role model in ensuring biosafety and capacity for biosecurity. Although Pakistan has made remarkable efforts promoting a culture of biosafety and biosecurity, several constraints persist related to sustainable development and the expansion of the biosecurity capacity in Pakistan. Studies suggest there is little understanding of dual-use research of concern among the majority of life scientists in Pakistan. Further, Pakistan has yet to fully develop and implement approaches for risk assessment, frameworks for oversight and regulation, or tools and procedures for monitoring and reporting situations in which misuse of biological materials might occur. More data are needed to answer questions about key biosecurity hazards specific to the country or region and the procedures that may be required for periodic risk assessments. Integrating biosecurity into the existing infrastructure with limited resources is key challenge in implementation. More coordination is required among various stakeholders to develop an effective biosecurity framework. This article focuses on Pakistan's strides toward biosecurity preparedness in terms of protecting pathogens, toxins, or biological technologies with dual-use risks to prevent their malevolent use. We propose a multidimensional biosecurity management model at the national level to strengthen the biosecurity enterprise in Pakistan.


Subject(s)
Bioterrorism/prevention & control , Containment of Biohazards/methods , Security Measures/organization & administration , Health Policy , Humans , Pakistan
8.
J Am Coll Surg ; 232(5): 793-796, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33592250

ABSTRACT

The US is facing the most significant health challenge since the 1918-1919 flu pandemic. A response commensurate with this challenge requires engaged leadership and organization across private and public sectors that span federal agencies, public and private healthcare systems, professional organizations, and industry. In the trauma and emergency care communities, we have long discussed the tension between competition in healthcare and the need for regional cooperation to respond to large-scale disasters. The response to COVID-19 has required unprecedented coordination of private and public sector entities. Given the competitive nature of the US health system, these sectors do not regularly work together despite the requirement to do so during a national emergency. This crisis has exposed how structural aspects of the present healthcare system have limited our ability to rapidly transition to a whole-nation response during a national crisis. We propose a renewed focus on the intersection of the healthcare system and national security, with the express goal of creating a public-private partnership focused on leveraging our healthcare infrastructure to support the national security interests of the US.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Public-Private Sector Partnerships , COVID-19/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Disaster Planning/economics , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Humans , Leadership , SARS-CoV-2 , Security Measures/economics , Security Measures/organization & administration , United States/epidemiology
9.
Ann Pharm Fr ; 79(4): 473-480, 2021 Jul.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33516718

ABSTRACT

With regard to the hospital drug supply chain, the safest system is the individual automated drug dispensing one provided by the pharmacy. For several years we have been trying to convince hospital decision-makers to set it up. In the meantime, to mitigate the risks of medication errors incurred by patients and caregivers, we have set up several work teams within the care units. These teams, made up of one pharmacist and one or two hospital pharmacy technicians, who notably manage the medicine cabinets in care units. The close collaboration with doctors and nurses developed over the years was a determining factor when it became necessary to provide the newly created additional intensive care units with drugs and medical devices (MDs) in order to cope with the crisis triggered by the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Daily monitoring of the drugs consumed by each patient, particularly neuromuscular blocking agents and MDs was a key element in managing stocks and anticipating changes of drugs, packaging and/or devices references. These facts give weight to the Claris report published in France which recognizes that the interactions of pharmacy technicians and pharmacists in the care units have positive effects in terms of quality and safety of patient care. They highlight the dangers to which patients and caregivers are exposed on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays when the pharmacy is closed. They legitimize the question of extending the opening of the pharmacy with a full team 365 days a year.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Critical Care/methods , Medication Systems, Hospital/organization & administration , Pandemics , Patient Care Team , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Attitude of Health Personnel , Bed Conversion , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Critical Care/organization & administration , Drug Storage/methods , France , Hospital Departments/organization & administration , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents/supply & distribution , Night Care/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Pharmacists , Pharmacy Technicians , Physicians/psychology , Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Recovery Room/organization & administration , Security Measures/organization & administration
11.
BMJ Glob Health ; 5(10)2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33033053

ABSTRACT

Infectious disease outbreaks pose major threats to human health and security. Countries with robust capacities for preventing, detecting and responding to outbreaks can avert many of the social, political, economic and health system costs of such crises. The Global Health Security Index (GHS Index)-the first comprehensive assessment and benchmarking of health security and related capabilities across 195 countries-recently found that no country is sufficiently prepared for epidemics or pandemics. The GHS Index can help health security stakeholders identify areas of weakness, as well as opportunities to collaborate across sectors, collectively strengthen health systems and achieve shared public health goals. Some scholars have recently offered constructive critiques of the GHS Index's approach to scoring and ranking countries; its weighting of select indicators; its emphasis on transparency; its focus on biosecurity and biosafety capacities; and divergence between select country scores and corresponding COVID-19-associated caseloads, morbidity, and mortality. Here, we (1) describe the practical value of the GHS Index; (2) present potential use cases to help policymakers and practitioners maximise the utility of the tool; (3) discuss the importance of scoring and ranking; (4) describe the robust methodology underpinning country scores and ranks; (5) highlight the GHS Index's emphasis on transparency and (6) articulate caveats for users wishing to use GHS Index data in health security research, policymaking and practice.


Subject(s)
Global Health , Security Measures/organization & administration , Benchmarking/organization & administration , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Leadership , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2
12.
PLoS One ; 15(10): e0238443, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33017446

ABSTRACT

For the complicated operation process, many risk factors, and long cycle of urban logistics, it is difficult to manage the security of urban logistics and it enhances the risk. Therefore, to study a set of effective management mode for the safe operation of urban logistics and improve the risk prediction mechanism, is the primary research item of urban logistics security management. This paper summarizes the risk factors to public security in the process of urban logistics, including pick up, warehouse storage, transport, and the end distribution. Generalized regression neural network (GRNN) is combined with particle swarm optimization (PSO) to predict accidents, and the Apriori algorithm is used to analyze the combination of high-frequency risk factors. The results show that the method of combining GRNN with PSO is effective in accident prediction and has a powerful generalization ability. It can prevent the occurrence of unnecessary urban logistics public accidents, improve the ability of relevant departments to deal with emergency incidents, and minimize the impact of urban logistics accidents on social and public security.


Subject(s)
City Planning , Security Measures/organization & administration , Accident Prevention , Accidents , Algorithms , China , Cities , Emergencies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Humans , Neural Networks, Computer , Organization and Administration , Risk Factors
13.
BMJ Glob Health ; 5(10)2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33106239

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic powerfully demonstrates the consequences of biothreats. Countries will want to know how to better prepare for future events. The Global Health Security Index (GHSI) is a broad, independent assessment of 195 countries' preparedness for biothreats that may aid this endeavour. However, to be useful, the GHSI's external validity must be demonstrated. We aimed to validate the GHSI against a range of external metrics to assess how it could be utilised by countries. METHODS: Global aggregate communicable disease outcomes were correlated with GHSI scores and linear regression models were examined to determine associations while controlling for a number of global macroindices. GHSI scores for countries previously exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome and Ebola and recipients of US Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) investment were compared with matched control countries. Possible content omissions in light of the progressing COVID-19 pandemic were assessed. RESULTS: GHSI scores for countries had strong criterion validity against the Joint External Evaluation ReadyScore (rho=0.82, p<0.0001), and moderate external validity against deaths from communicable diseases (-0.56, p<0.0001). GHSI scores were associated with reduced deaths from communicable diseases (F(3, 172)=22.75, p<0.0001). The proportion of deaths from communicable diseases decreased 4.8% per 10-point rise in GHSI. Recipient countries of the GHSA (n=31) and SARS-affected countries (n=26), had GHSI scores 6.0 (p=0.0011) and 8.2 (p=0.0010) points higher than matched controls, respectively. Biosecurity and biosafety appear weak globally including in high-income countries, and health systems, particularly in Africa, are not prepared. Notably, the GHSI does not account for all factors important for health security. CONCLUSION: The GHSI shows promise as a valid tool to guide action on biosafety, biosecurity and systems preparedness. However, countries need to look beyond existing metrics to other factors moderating the impact of future pandemics and other biothreats. Consideration of anthropogenic and large catastrophic scenarios is also needed.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Global Health , International Cooperation , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Security Measures/organization & administration , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Disaster Planning , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Health Policy , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Public Health Practice , SARS-CoV-2
15.
Risk Anal ; 40(11): 2462-2477, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32579752

ABSTRACT

The increasing need to manage biosecurity threats, such as diseases, zoonoses, and biological weapons, poses serious challenges for risk analysts and policymakers. These threats are large in number, can occur concurrently, and may cause multiple tangible and intangible impacts. They often have an emerging nature, exacerbated by incomplete evidence about their probability of occurrence and potential impacts. There is also a limited amount of time and resources available to evaluate the risks posed by each threat, and it is difficult to learn from past projects. On the other hand, there is also a need to provide policymakers with transparent and consistent threat prioritizations, together with evidence-based recommendations. In response to these challenges, we propose a risk analysis framework for the prioritization and management of biosecurity threats. The framework encompasses key design choices that analysts may use in risk analysis projects along three dimensions: risk support, risk group, and risk organization. The framework has prescriptive value, as a design tool to inform risk analysis projects in this context, along with descriptive value, as a learning tool to understand past projects. We applied the framework prescriptively in two biosecurity threat prioritization projects for the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and illustrate its descriptive value by reporting our experience of these projects as in-depth case studies. Overall, the proposed framework provides important insights into the impact of different design choices on the success of risk analysis projects for biosecurity threat prioritizations.


Subject(s)
Risk Assessment , Security Measures/organization & administration , Animals , Humans , Probability
17.
Caracas; Observatorio Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación; 22 may. 2020. 110-120 p. tab.(Observador del Conocimiento. Revista Especializada en Gestión Social del Conocimiento, 5, 1).
Monography in Spanish | LILACS, LIVECS | ID: biblio-1119189

ABSTRACT

Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar las posibles vías de elaboración de vacunas basado en técnicas novedosas que, aunado al gran esfuerzo que se está realizando en otras áreas de la ciencia, podrían ser clave para mitigar los efectos de del COVI 19, tomando en cuenta la declaración que se hizo en Venezuela el 13 de marzo del 2020 por parte del Ejecutivo Nacional de las medidas del Aislamiento Social ante la pandemia declarada por la Organización Mundial de la Salud como consecuencia de la presencia del COVID-19. Lo anterior generó la necesidad de acceder a las cifras del índice delictivo de las cuatro semanas anteriores a la declaratoria del aislamiento social y relacionarlas al primer mes de la cuarentena social. Con estos datos centrados en el estado Miranda y aportados por la Secretaría Coordinadora de Seguridad y Paz Ciudadana de esta entidad en relación a los delitos de Homicidio, Robo y Hurto, como muestra de la realidad nacional, se realizaron comparaciones entre estos dos períodos. De este análisis se presenta como conclusión una disminución de un 79% de la incidencia delictiva acumulada en el primer mes del aislamiento social en relación con el mes anterior. Centrado en estas conclusiones se presentan las recomendaciones y aspectos de interés a ser monitoreados desde las capacidades científicas, tecnológicas y de innovación de los organismos de seguridad ciudadana(AU)


This essay seeks to provide recommendations for effective-ness and efficiency in police institutions, to make optimal use of available resources and to best adapt them to the specific realities faced in the social field where these organizations carry out their activities, under the current condition of Social Isolation, as a governance action taken to prevent the spread of COVID-19. The different environment situations to be faced by citizen security organiza-tions, determine the complexity of this, and the response mechanisms of these institu-tions constitute management models to the different varieties to be assumed and detailed in this work. The decree issued by the Venezuelan government on March 13, 2020, imposing Social Isolation because of the COVID-19 pandemic declared by the World Health Organization, created the need to access the crime rate figures of the four weeks prior to the declaration of social isolation, and link them to the first month of social quarantine. With this data focused on the Miranda State and provided by the Coordinating Secretary of Security and Citizen Peace of this entity in relation to the crimes of: Homicide, Robbery and theft, comparisons were made between these two periods. This analysis reflects a 79% decrease in the reported crime incidence in the first month of social isolation compared to the previous month, and focused on these findings, recommendations and aspects of interest are given, to be monitored from the scientific, technological and innovation capacities of citizen security agencies(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Security Measures/organization & administration , Social Isolation , Venezuela , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Law Enforcement
19.
Guatemala; MSPAS; 20 mar 2020. 6 p.
Non-conventional in Spanish | LIGCSA, LILACS | ID: biblio-1096391

ABSTRACT

El objetivo de este documento es asegurar la prestación de servicios de Salud, de atención a los usuarios en el primer y segundo nivel de atención del País, a través de una adecuada gestión administrativa, técnica y operativa en las 29 Áreas de Salud. Aplica a las 29 Áreas de Salud y su red de Servicios a nivel Nacional, con énfasis en las Áreas que cuentan con puntos fronterizos, Aéreo, Marítimo y Terrestre, así como aquellas en las que se haya identificado un caso sospechoso con antecedentes de viaje .


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Secondary Care/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus , Security Measures/organization & administration , National Health Systems/organization & administration , Sanitary Control of Borders , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Guatemala
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...