Serotonin syndrome treated with cyproheptadine using NPi from a digital pupillometer as a therapeutic indicator: A case report.

RATIONALE: Serotonin syndrome is a potentially life-threatening condition resulting from the use of antidepressants, their interactions with other serotonergic medications, or poisoning. It presents with a triad of psychiatric, dysautonomic, and neurological symptoms and is sometimes fatal. While cyproheptadine is a specific treatment option, the optimal duration of its administration remains unclear. The purpose of this report is to quantitatively assess the endpoints of serotonin syndrome treatment. Based on the hypothesis that neurological pupil index (NPi) on a digital pupil recorder would correlate with the severity of the serotonin syndrome, we administered cyproheptadine using NPi as an indicator. PATIENT CONCERNS: A patient with a history of depression was brought to our hospital after he overdosed on 251 tablets of serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. DIAGNOSES: On day 3, the patient was diagnosed with serotonin syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: Cyproheptadine syrup was administered at 4 mg every 4 hours. The NPi of the automated pupillometer was simultaneously measured. On day 5, the NPi exceeded 3.0 cyproheptadine was discontinued. OUTCOMES: The patient was discharged on day 7. LESSONS: The lack of considerable improvement during the treatment period suggests that the patient may have improved on his own. In this case, the relationship between NPi and the severity of serotonin syndrome could not be determined.

A Case Series of 11 Patients With Subacute Serotonin Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Serotonin syndrome is an acute, life-threatening illness characterized by mental status changes, neuromuscular symptoms, and autonomic instability. Some patients taking serotonergic antidepressants have been noted to have unexplained mental status changes and/or neuromuscular changes without autonomic instability raising the possibility of a more chronic or attenuated form of serotonin syndrome. OBJECTIVE: Assessment of antidepressant blood levels to support the diagnosis of a subacute serotonin syndrome. METHODS: At a tertiary psychiatric outpatient clinic, patients with unexplained mental status and/or neuromuscular changes without autonomic instability had antidepressant blood levels assessed. RESULTS: Eleven patients were identified with signs and symptoms partially consistent with serotonin syndrome. Nine patients had cognitive changes, while four patients had motor changes, and three patients had psychosis. All patients had elevated blood levels of a single serotonergic antidepressant. Limited follow-up suggests that symptoms improve with reduction of antidepressant medication. CONCLUSIONS: These cases suggest that a more chronic, attenuated form of serotonin syndrome exists. Diagnostic criteria are proposed for a distinct clinical entity: subacute serotonin syndrome (SSS). Further research is required to validate these criteria. Clinicians should consider drawing antidepressant levels for patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of SSS-especially those at increased vulnerability for excessive serotonergic agonism. Given the high prevalence of antidepressant medication use, the awareness of SSS could lead to improved patient outcomes and public health.

Fentanyl-Induced Serotonin Syndrome 5 Days After Cessation of Serotonergic Agents: A Case Report.

A 21-year-old patient with intellectual disability was admitted for gastroenteritis due to serotonergic medication overdose, and subsequently developed serotonin syndrome. Her symptoms initially improved after the cessation of serotonergic medications, but worsened 5 days later after fentanyl administration during general anesthesia. On emergence, she had convulsions and was nonresponsive. Subsequent imaging and electroencephalography did not demonstrate intracranial pathology or seizure activity. We suspect she had an exacerbation of her serotonin syndrome. She recovered successfully after supportive care. This case demonstrates that common medications used during anesthesia such as fentanyl can provoke serotonin syndrome, even several days after serotonergic drug discontinuation.

Serotonin syndrome from combination hydrocodone and cyclobenzaprine in a patient with cerebral palsy.

Aim: Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a life-threatening syndrome that occurs with the use of serotonergic drugs, most commonly due to two or more agents. Cerebral palsy is associated with mood disorders, and more commonly pain, with a prevalence of up to 50-80%. Case presentation: A 58-year-old female with cerebral palsy, metastatic malignancy and mood disorder who presented to the emergency department with acute-on-chronic pain, and signs of SS. She was initiated on iv. dilaudid, titrated off oral medications and scheduled for a left-sided sacroiliac joint injection. Results: It was suspected that due to additional doses of hydrocodone and cyclobenzaprine, she developed moderate-SS. Conclusion: Physicians need to be cognizant of comorbidities and uncommon pain medications that can predispose patients to SS.

The Neuropsychiatric Safety Profile of Lasmiditan: A Comparative Disproportionality Analysis with Triptans.

Migraine constitutes the world's second-leading cause of disability. Triptans, as serotonin 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, remain the first-line treatment, despite discouraged use in individuals at high cardiovascular risk. Lasmiditan, a selective lipophilic 5-HT1F agonist without vasoconstrictive effects, is an emerging option. We aimed to investigate the safety profile of lasmiditan in the WHO pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®) using a comparative disproportionality analysis with triptans. VigiBase® was queried for all reports involving lasmiditan and triptans. Disproportionality analyses relied on the calculation of the information component (IC), for which 95% confidence interval (CI) lower bound positivity was required for signal detection. We obtained 826 reports involving lasmiditan. Overall, 10 adverse drug reaction classes were disproportionately reported with triptans, while only neurological (IC 1.6; 95% CI 1.5-1.7) and psychiatric (IC 1.5; 95% CI 1.3-1.7) disorders were disproportionately reported with lasmiditan. Sedation, serotonin syndrome, euphoric mood, and autoscopy had the strongest signals. When compared with triptans, 19 out of 22 neuropsychiatric signals persisted. The results of our analysis provide a more precise semiology of the neuropsychiatric effects of lasmiditan, with symptoms such as autoscopy and panic attacks. The cardiovascular adverse drug reaction risk with triptans was confirmed. In contrast, caution is warranted with lasmiditan use in patients with neurological or psychiatric comorbidities or serotonin syndrome risk. Our study was hindered by pharmacovigilance flaws, and further studies should help in validating these results. Our findings suggest that lasmiditan is a safe alternative for migraine treatment, especially when the neuropsychiatric risk is outweighed by the cardiovascular burden.

Dexmedetomidine in the treatment of toxicologic conditions: a systematic review and review of the toxicology investigators consortium database.

INTRODUCTION: Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist which is widely used for sedation. Dexmedetomidine does not suppress the respiratory drive and produces a state of cooperative sedation; it may be associated with beneficial outcomes in the general critical care population. The role of dexmedetomidine in the treatment of toxicologic conditions (excluding alcohol withdrawal) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To critically assess and summarize the literature regarding the use of dexmedetomidine in toxicologic conditions other than alcohol withdrawal. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the medical literature to identify all existing evidence regarding the use of dexmedetomidine for toxicologic conditions. We excluded reviews and commentary, studies reporting exclusively on alcohol withdrawal, and studies reporting the use of dexmedetomidine to treat iatrogenic sedative withdrawal in the intensive care unit. We also performed a review of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) database for patients treated with dexmedetomidine. RESULTS: We identified 98 studies meeting inclusion criteria; 87 of these were case reports or case series, representing 99 unique cases. Eleven articles with other designs were identified, which included 138 patients treated with dexmedetomidine for toxicologic conditions. Ninety-three cases from the ToxIC registry met inclusion criteria. Common indications for dexmedetomidine included stimulant intoxication, sedative withdrawal, serotonin syndrome, antimuscarinic toxidrome, opioid withdrawal, and cannabinoid intoxication. Dexmedetomidine was usually administered by continuous infusion; bolus administration was reported in a minority of cases. Adverse effects were uncommon. The quality of evidence was generally low, given the preponderance of case reports, the rate of missing or poorly reported data, and the near-universal co-administration of other sedatives. TREATMENT OF STIMULANT POISONING: Fifty-nine patients with stimulant poisoning were treated with dexmedetomidine. There was reasonably good evidence that dexmedetomidine was helpful in the treatment of stimulant poisoning. TREATMENT OF SEDATIVE WITHDRAWAL: Twenty-two patients with sedative withdrawal were treated with dexmedetomidine. Several case reports of very high-quality suggested efficacy of dexmedetomidine for this indication, particularly for baclofen withdrawal. TREATMENT OF SEROTONIN SYNDROME: Twenty-six patients with serotonin syndrome were treated with dexmedetomidine. This evidence was of lower quality due to missing clinical details, potential overdiagnosis of serotonin syndrome, and near-universal concomitant treatment with other sedatives. TREATMENT OF ANTIMUSCARINIC POISONING: Forty-two patients with antimuscarinic poisoning were treated with dexmedetomidine. This evidence was of low quality and was limited by infrequent use of the preferred antidote, physostigmine. TREATMENT OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL: Forty-four patients with opioid withdrawal were treated with dexmedetomidine. This evidence was of low quality due to missing clinical details and near-universal concomitant treatment with other agents. The one high-quality trial reported the use of dexmedetomidine in ultra-rapid opioid detoxification, which is not indicated in modern practice. TREATMENT OF CANNABINOID INTOXICATION: Five patients with cannabinoid intoxication were treated with dexmedetomidine. No definite conclusion can be drawn from the limited available evidence. DISCUSSION: It is important to distinguish between the use of dexmedetomidine as a general sedative, which is likely to increase as the overall utilization of dexmedetomidine in critical care settings increases, and the use of dexmedetomidine as a specific pharmacologic treatment for a toxicologic condition. Well-established pharmacologic data from animal and human studies suggest dexmedetomidine counteracts stimulant-induced norepinephrine release. The mechanism by which dexmedetomidine treats sedative withdrawal is unclear. Some animal data show that dexmedetomidine may indirectly suppress serotonin release, which may suggest a role for dexmedetomidine in this condition. CONCLUSIONS: There is a small and generally low-quality body of evidence which suggests that dexmedetomidine may be helpful in the treatment of certain toxicologic conditions, particularly stimulant intoxication and sedative withdrawal. Further high-quality research is needed to clarify the role of dexmedetomidine in patients with toxicologic conditions.

Safety of Ketamine Augmentation to Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Literature Review and Case Series.

Objective: Ketamine is increasingly prescribed for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), often as add-on to regular antidepressants. Augmentation of ketamine to monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) is advised against, as this practice might increase blood pressure or cause serotonin syndrome. Despite the potential relevance for patients, little is known about actual side effects of combined use. We summarize literature on the safety and add results of our case series.Evidence Review: PubMed and Embase were searched from inception to July 2021 for English-language articles describing concomitant use of ketamine and MAOIs. The search strategy included terms for "ketamine" AND "monoamine oxidase inhibitor" including generic and brand names. Additionally, we describe the safety of twice weekly oral esketamine administration over the course of 5 weeks to 9 months in 8 TRD patients using MAOIs.Findings: After deduplication, we screened 138 articles and assessed 43 full texts. Twelve studies were included with a total of 39 patients receiving ketamine and MAOIs. Blood pressure and heart rate increased in multiple cases, though this was deemed clinically insignificant in all but 1 patient. No signs of hypertensive crisis or serotonin syndrome were observed. In our case series, we observed minor elevations in blood pressure and heart rate and no serious adverse events.Conclusions and Relevance: The results suggest that combined use of MAOIs and esketamine is less prone to severe side effects than presumed. The investigated sample size was small, and prescribed doses of MAOIs were relatively low. Further research is required before definite conclusions about the safety of this combination can be drawn.

Serotonin Syndrome After Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy often require pharmacotherapy for symptom management. Serotonin syndrome is a rare clinical entity that can be precipitated by the medications used to treat nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. CASE: A 35-year-old pregnant individual with a history of hyperemesis gravidarum in an earlier pregnancy requiring prolonged hospitalization presented with nausea and vomiting at 7 weeks of gestation. She was incidentally found to have severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection when she was universally screened at the time of admission. She required pharmacotherapy, including prochlorperazine and ondansetron for treatment of nausea as well as sumatriptan for migraine. She developed acute spasticity, autonomic dysfunction, and temperature rise, precipitated by antiemetic therapy, consistent with serotonin syndrome. The syndrome resolved with supportive care and benzodiazepines. CONCLUSION: Serotonin syndrome is a serious clinical entity that can be provoked by the pharmacotherapy given to treat nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. This medical emergency requires early recognition and prompt management.

Antidepressant-induced serotonin syndrome in older patients: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Widespread prescription of antidepressants and their resulting role in serotonin syndrome (SS) are of great importance for clinical practice in the elderly. This study aims to investigate possible associations of antidepressant drug-induced SS with related variables in these patients. METHODS: A total of 238 older adults using antidepressants were included. Patients who fulfilled the Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria (HSTC) for SS were considered as the clinical groups (mild, moderate, or severe), and those who did not as the control group. We recorded all patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, gender, comorbidity index, number of medications, daily equivalent dose of the relevant antidepressant according to fluoxetine per day, electrocardiogram test results, laboratory results, and management. RESULTS: The mean age of all patients was 75.4 ± 7.6 years and 63.4% were female. Sixty patients had SS, while 178 patients did not. There was a significant difference between those with and without SS in terms of gender, frequency of combination antidepressant therapy, and daily equivalent antidepressant dose (P < 0.05). The most common diagnostic findings in SS patients were tremor and hyperreflexia and 31.7% was mild, and moderate in 68.3% with higher median age and number of medications (P < 0.041). Antidepressants were discontinued in all patients regardless of severity, of whom 71.7% were treated with benzodiazepines and 36.7% with cyproheptadine. After adjusting for age and sex, association with use of SSRI + SNRI, use of any combination therapy, and daily equivalent dose remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: The widespread single or combined use of antidepressants in older adults represents an increased clinical concern for SS and physicians should be aware of this drug-related complication in older patients.