ABSTRACT
Joseph M. Mathews' study at St. Mark's Hospital (London) in the 1877 to 1878 winter was followed shortly by a landmark move toward specialization in the United States: Mathews' heading of a Special Commission on Rectal Diseases appointed at the 23rd Annual Session of the Kentucky State Medical Society, held April 2 to 4, 1878. Various "rectal specialists," under various makeshift titles, were lecturing and publishing by the mid-1890s. The world's first proctologic journal, published between 1894 and 1898, was Mathews' Medical Quarterly, from its inception interpellating a community of colleagues.
Subject(s)
Colonoscopy/history , Colorectal Surgery/history , Rectal Diseases/history , Sigmoidoscopy/history , Colorectal Surgery/organization & administration , Colorectal Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Endoscopy, Digestive System/history , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Male , Publishing/history , Publishing/statistics & numerical data , United StatesABSTRACT
Although it is likely that cases of what we know as granulomatous inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease) may have been recorded as early as 1769, this illness is basically a disease of the 20th century. This historical review traces the development of our understanding of the disease and the evolution of its operative management.
Subject(s)
Crohn Disease/history , Gastroenterology/history , Crohn Disease/surgery , Eponyms , History, 20th Century , Hospitals/history , Humans , Ileostomy/history , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/history , New York City , Sigmoidoscopy/history , United StatesABSTRACT
Current practices vary regarding the approach to small polyps discovered during screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. The most common practice is to perform colonoscopy whenever any adenoma is detected, a strategy that generally uses biopsy of polyps < or = 5 mm in size. However, data suggest that tubular adenomas < 1 cm in size in the distal colon have less predictive value than other distal adenomas for advanced adenomas in the proximal colon. Thus, some centers reserve colonoscopy for distal adenomas with tubulovillous or villous histology, > 1 cm in size, or with high-grade dysplasia. At the other end of the spectrum, another school of thought advocates screening colonoscopy, recognizing that most patients with advanced proximal adenomas do not have polyps in their distal colon. Advocates of this approach use any excuse to perform colonoscopy, whether it be a positive fecal occult blood test, minor symptoms, or small polyp at flexible sigmoidoscopy, even if hyperplastic. This review describes the history of the controversy regarding management of findings at flexible sigmoidoscopy, the data pertinent to the controversy, and the basis for the three approaches described above, all of which are currently within the standard of medical care.
