Efficacy and safety of different immunotherapies combined with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Background: The efficacy and safety of different immunosuppressants combined with chemotherapy in treating patients with small-cell lung cancer (extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer, limited-disease small-cell lung cancer and relapsed small-cell lung cancer) are still unknown, and there are no reports directly comparing the efficacy and safety of other immunotherapies. Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer. Method: We searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases for relevant articles published from inception to November 11, 2020. The risk of bias of the included studies was conducted using the Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool. Multiple Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed. They conducted data analysis using R Studio and STATA version 15.1. The outcomes comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), stability of response (SOR), duration of response (DOR) and adverse events of grade 3 or higher (AE grade≥3). A 95% confidence interval (CI) was provided for each estimate. Results: This meta-analysis included 16 RCT studies with 5898 patients. For OS, relative to chemotherapy (MD=-4.49; 95%CI [-7.97, -1.03]), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (MD=-4.62; 95%CI [-9.08, -0.11]), ipilimumab (MD=-4.26; 95%CI [-8.01, -0.3]) and nivolumab(MD=-5.66; 95%CI [-10.44, -1.11]) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (MD=-4.56; 95%CI [-8.7, -0.1]), serplulimab can significantly increase the OS of SCLC patients. There was no significant difference between PFS, SOR and DOR. Analysis of AE showed that different immunotherapy combined chemotherapy regimens were similar to single chemotherapy regarding the overall incidence of AE grade≥3. However, after the cumulative ranking of the common symptoms of different adverse reactions, it was found that nivolumab ranked first in the occurrence probability of anemia (99.08%), fatigue (84.78%), and decreased appetite (89.66%). durvalumab was the most likely in nausea (75.4%). Pembrolizumab (76.24%) was most likely to cause pruritus. Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy caused less diarrhea than chemotherapy alone (80.16%). Conclusions: According to our analysis, serplulimab combined with chemotherapy is more likely to show better efficacy with a manageable safety profile for small-cell lung cancer. However, the evidence for this comparison shows some limitations due to the number of literature. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023486053.

Construction of a prognostic model for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients undergoing immune therapy in northernmost China and prediction of treatment efficacy based on response status at different time points.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently, the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors has significantly improved the survival of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. However, not all patients can benefit from immunotherapy; therefore, there is an urgent need for precise predictive markers to screen the population for the benefit of immunotherapy. However, single markers have limited predictive accuracy, so a comprehensive predictive model is needed to better enable precision immunotherapy. The aim of this study was to establish a prognostic model for immunotherapy in ES-SCLC patients using basic clinical characteristics and peripheral hematological indices of the patients, which would provide a strategy for the clinical realization of precision immunotherapy and improve the prognosis of small cell lung cancer patients. METHODS: This research retrospectively collected data from ES-SCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between March 1, 2019, and October 31, 2022, at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. The study data was randomly split into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. Variables associated with patients' overall survival were screened and modeled by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Models were presented visually via Nomogram plots. Model discrimination was evaluated by Harrell's C index, tROC, and tAUC. The calibration of the model was assessed by calibration curves. In addition, the clinical utility of the model was assessed using a DCA curve. After calculating the total risk score of patients in the training set, patients were stratified by risk using percentile partitioning. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot OS and PFS survival curves for different risk groups and response statuses at different milestone time points. Differences in survival time groups were compared using the chi-square test. Statistical analysis software included R 4.1.2 and SPSS 26. RESULTS: This study included a total of 113 ES-SCLC patients who received immunotherapy, including 79 in the training set and 34 in the validation set. Six variables associated with poorer OS in patients were screened by Cox regression analysis: liver metastasis (P = 0.001), bone metastasis (P = 0.013), NLR < 2.14 (P = 0.005), LIPI assessed as poor (P < 0.001), PNI < 51.03 (P = 0.002), and LDH ≥ 146.5 (P = 0.037). A prognostic model for immunotherapy in ES-SCLC patients was constructed based on the above variables. The Harrell's C-index in the training and validation sets of the model was 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.93) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.76-0.99), respectively; the AUC values corresponding to 12, 18, and 24 months in the tROC curves of the training set were 0.745, 0.848, and 0.819 in the training set and 0.858, 0.904 and 0.828 in the validation set; the tAUC curves show that the overall tAUC is > 0.7 and does not fluctuate much over time in both the training and validation sets. The calibration plot demonstrated the good calibration of the model, and the DCA curve indicated that the model had practical clinical applications. Patients in the training set were categorized into low, intermediate, and high risk groups based on their predicted risk scores in the Nomogram graphs. In the training set, 52 patients (66%) died with a median OS of 15.0 months and a median PFS of 7.8 months. Compared with the high-risk group (median OS: 12.3 months), the median OS was significantly longer in the intermediate-risk group (median OS: 24.5 months, HR = 0.47, P = 0.038) and the low-risk group (median OS not reached, HR = 0.14, P = 0.007). And, the median PFS was also significantly prolonged in the intermediate-risk group (median PFS: 12.7 months, HR = 0.45, P = 0.026) and low-risk group (median PFS not reached, HR = 0.12, P = 0.004) compared with the high-risk group (median PFS: 6.2 months). Similar results were obtained in the validation set. In addition, we observed that in real-world ES-SCLC patients, at 6 weeks after immunotherapy, the median OS was significantly longer in responders than in non-responders (median OS: 19.5 months vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.033). Similar results were obtained at 12 weeks (median OS: 20.7 months vs 11.9 months, P = 0.044) and 20 weeks (median OS: 20.7 months vs 11.7 months, P = 0.015). Finally, we found that in the real world, ES-SCLC patients without liver metastasis (P = 0.002), bone metastasis (P = 0.001) and a total number of metastatic organs < 2 (P = 0.002) are more likely to become long-term survivors after receiving immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: This study constructed a new prognostic model based on basic patient clinical characteristics and peripheral blood indices, which can be a good predictor of the prognosis of immunotherapy in ES-SCLC patients; in the real world, the response status at milestone time points (6, 12, and 20 weeks) can be a good indicator of long-term survival in ES-SCLC patients receiving immunotherapy.

Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Is Liquid Biopsy a New Tool Able to Predict the Efficacy of Immunotherapy?

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cases represent approximately 15% of all lung cancer cases, remaining a recalcitrant malignancy with poor survival and few treatment options. In the last few years, the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy improved clinical outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone, resulting in the current standard of care for SCLC. However, the advantage of immunotherapy only applies to a few SCLC patients, and predictive biomarkers selection are lacking for SCLC. In particular, due to some features of SCLC, such as high heterogeneity, elevated cell plasticity, and low-quality tissue samples, SCLC biopsies cannot be used as biomarkers. Therefore, the characterization of the tumor and, subsequently, the selection of an appropriate therapeutic combination may benefit greatly from liquid biopsy. Soluble factors, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and extracellular vesicles (EVs) are now useful tools in the characterization of SCLC. This review summarizes the most recent data on biomarkers detectable with liquid biopsy, emphasizing their role in supporting tumor detection and their potential role in SCLC treatment choice.

Evolutionary trajectories of small cell lung cancer under therapy.

The evolutionary processes that underlie the marked sensitivity of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) to chemotherapy and rapid relapse are unknown1-3. Here we determined tumour phylogenies at diagnosis and throughout chemotherapy and immunotherapy by multiregion sequencing of 160 tumours from 65 patients. Treatment-naive SCLC exhibited clonal homogeneity at distinct tumour sites, whereas first-line platinum-based chemotherapy led to a burst in genomic intratumour heterogeneity and spatial clonal diversity. We observed branched evolution and a shift to ancestral clones underlying tumour relapse. Effective radio- or immunotherapy induced a re-expansion of founder clones with acquired genomic damage from first-line chemotherapy. Whereas TP53 and RB1 alterations were exclusively part of the common ancestor, MYC family amplifications were frequently not constituents of the founder clone. At relapse, emerging subclonal mutations affected key genes associated with SCLC biology, and tumours harbouring clonal CREBBP/EP300 alterations underwent genome duplications. Gene-damaging TP53 alterations and co-alterations of TP53 missense mutations with TP73, CREBBP/EP300 or FMN2 were significantly associated with shorter disease relapse following chemotherapy. In summary, we uncover key processes of the genomic evolution of SCLC under therapy, identify the common ancestor as the source of clonal diversity at relapse and show central genomic patterns associated with sensitivity and resistance to chemotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in treating patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Background: Despite numerous immunotherapy and chemotherapy regimens available for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), it remains unclear which regimen is the most effective and safest; relative studies comparing such regimens are scarce. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy combinations with chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. In addition, for the first time, comparisons among the first-line systemic regimens on OS and PFS in ES-SCLC by each time node were made. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google Scholars, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international conferences were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding comparing immunotherapy combinations with chemotherapy as first-line treatments for patients with advanced ES-SCLC from inception to 1 November. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were generated for dichotomous variants by RStudio 4.2.1. The outcomes comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events of grade 3 or higher (Grade ≥ 3 AEs). Results: Eventually, a total of nine RCTs reporting 4,352 individuals with nine regimens were enrolled. The regimens were ipilimumabnu (Ipi), atezolizumab (Atez), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Durv-Trem), durvalumab (Durv), pembrolizumab (Pemb), adebrelimab (Adeb), serplulimab (Serp), atezolizumab plus tiragolumab (Atez-Tira), and nivolumab (Nivo). With regard to OS, serplulimab (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.81) was found to yield the best OS benefit when compared with chemotherapy. Meanwhile, serplulimab had the highest probability (46.11%) for better OS. Furthermore, compared with chemotherapy, serplulimab significantly increased the OS rate from the 6th to the 21st month. With regard to PFS, serplulimab (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.59) was found to yield the best PFS benefit when compared with chemotherapy. Simultaneously, serplulimab had the highest probability (94.48%) for better PFS. Serplulimab was also a long-lasting first-line regimen in both OS and PFS from a longitudinal perspective. In addition, there was no significant difference among the various treatment options for ORR and grade ≥3 AEs. Conclusion: Considering OS, PFS, ORR, and safety profiles, serplulimab with chemotherapy should be recommended as the best therapy for patients with ES-SCLC. Certainly, more head-to-head studies are needed to confirm these findings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022373291.

WEE1 inhibition enhances the antitumor immune response to PD-L1 blockade by the concomitant activation of STING and STAT1 pathways in SCLC.

Small cell lung cancers (SCLCs) have high mutational burden but are relatively unresponsive to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Using SCLC models, we demonstrate that inhibition of WEE1, a G2/M checkpoint regulator induced by DNA damage, activates the STING-TBK1-IRF3 pathway, which increases type I interferons (IFN-α and IFN-ß) and pro-inflammatory chemokines (CXCL10 and CCL5), facilitating an immune response via CD8+ cytotoxic T cell infiltration. We further show that WEE1 inhibition concomitantly activates the STAT1 pathway, increasing IFN-γ and PD-L1 expression. Consistent with these findings, combined WEE1 inhibition (AZD1775) and PD-L1 blockade causes remarkable tumor regression, activation of type I and II interferon pathways, and infiltration of cytotoxic T cells in multiple immunocompetent SCLC genetically engineered mouse models, including an aggressive model with stabilized MYC. Our study demonstrates cell-autonomous and immune-stimulating activity of WEE1 inhibition in SCLC models. Combined inhibition of WEE1 plus PD-L1 blockade represents a promising immunotherapeutic approach in SCLC.

A prognostic model of non small cell lung cancer based on TCGA and ImmPort databases.

Bioinformatics methods are used to construct an immune gene prognosis assessment model for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to screen biomarkers that affect the occurrence and prognosis of NSCLC. The transcriptomic data and clinicopathological data of NSCLC and cancer-adjacent normal tissues were downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and the immune-related genes were obtained from the IMMPORT database ( http://www.immport.org/ ); then, the differentially expressed immune genes were screened out. Based on these genes, an immune gene prognosis model was constructed. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Further, the correlations among the risk score, clinicopathological characteristics, tumor microenvironment, and the prognosis of NSCLC were analyzed. A total of 193 differentially expressed immune genes related to NSCLC were screened based on the "wilcox.test" in R language, and Cox single factor analysis showed that 19 differentially expressed immune genes were associated with the prognosis of NSCLC (P < 0.05). After including 19 differentially expressed immune genes with P < 0.05 into the Cox multivariate analysis, an immune gene prognosis model of NSCLC was constructed (it included 13 differentially expressed immune genes). Based on the risk score, the samples were divided into the high-risk and low-risk groups. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve results showed that the 5-year overall survival rate in the high-risk group was 32.4%, and the 5-year overall survival rate in the low-risk group was 53.7%. The receiver operating characteristic model curve confirmed that the prediction model had a certain accuracy (AUC = 0.673). After incorporating multiple variables into the Cox regression analysis, the results showed that the immune gene prognostic risk score was an independent predictor of the prognosis of NSCLC patients. There was a certain correlation between the risk score and degree of neutrophil infiltration in the tumor microenvironment. The NSCLC immune gene prognosis assessment model was constructed based on bioinformatics methods, and it can be used to calculate the prognostic risk score of NSCLC patients. Further, this model is expected to provide help for clinical judgment of the prognosis of NSCLC patients.

CD8 T-cell-mediated cerebellitis directed against Purkinje cell antigen after ipilimumab for small cell lung cancer.

We report a rapidly progressive and fatal CD8 T-cell-mediated cerebellitis after ipilimumab (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitor) for small cell lung cancer. Clinical features and histopathology were consistent with an accelerated form of paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration. A patchy CD8 T-cell infiltrate spatially corresponded to areas of Purkinje cell loss, with occasional CD8 polarisation towards Purkinje cells. CD20-positive B cells were sparse. CD8 T-cell-mediated cerebellitis after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment may recapitulate the early stages of paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration.

Small cell lung cancer stem cells display mesenchymal properties and exploit immune checkpoint pathways in activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor type with early dissemination and distant metastasis capacity. Even though optimal chemotherapy responses are observed initially in many patients, therapy resistance is almost inevitable. Accordingly, SCLC has been regarded as an archetype for cancer stem cell (CSC) dynamics. To determine the immune-modulatory influence of CSC in SCLC, this study focused on the characterization of CD44+CD90+ CSC-like subpopulations in SCLC. These cells displayed mesenchymal properties, differentiated into different lineages and further contributed to CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) responses. The interaction between CD44+CD90+ CSC-like cells and T cells led to the upregulation of checkpoint molecules PD-1, CTLA-4, TIM-3, and LAG3. In the patient-derived lymph nodes, CD44+ SCLC metastases were also observed with T cells expressing PD-1, TIM-3, or LAG3. Proliferation and IFN-γ expression capacity of TIM-3 and LAG3 co-expressing CTLs are adversely affected over long-time co-culture with CD44+CD90+ CSC-like cells. Moreover, especially through IFN-γ secreted by the T cells, the CSC-like SCLC cells highly expressed PD-L1 and PD-L2. Upon a second encounter with immune-experienced, IFN-γ-stimulated CSC-like SCLC cells, both cytotoxic and proliferation capacities of T cells were hampered. In conclusion, our data provide evidence for the superior potential of the SCLC cells with stem-like and mesenchymal properties to gain immune regulatory capacities and cope with cytotoxic T cell responses. With their high metastatic and immune-modulatory assets, the CSC subpopulation in SCLC may serve as a preferential target for checkpoint blockade immunotherapy .

Aberrant Alteration of Circulating Lymphocyte Subsets in Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Radiotherapy.

Purpose: The role of different circulating lymphocyte subsets, as well as their correlation with clinical characteristics of small cell lung cancer patients have not yet been fully understood. This study aims to evaluate the influence of the fluctuating absolute numbers of lymphocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood of patients with small cell lung cancer. Methods: The absolute counts and percentages of lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood of 329 patients with small cell lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The numbers of CD3+, CD3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes, CD3-CD19+ B lymphocytes, and CD3-CD16+CD56+ NK cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Their relationship with the patients' clinical characteristics were statistically evaluated. Results: The CD4/CD8 values derived from the absolute number and percentage of CD3+CD4+ cells divided by CD3+CD8+ cells were identical (1.86 ± 0.99). There was no association between any of the lymphocyte subsets levels and age/sex of the 329 patients with small cell lung cancer. The patients with advanced stage had a reduction in CD3+ and CD3+CD4+ T cell counts and a decreased CD4/CD8 ratio. The levels of CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3-CD19+ B cells, CD3-CD16+CD56+ NK cells, and CD4/CD8 ratio were associated with advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage. Patients who had undergone radiotherapy were characterized by lymphopenia with lower numbers of CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+ T lymphocyte, B lymphocyte, NK cell, and CD4/CD8 ratio. The evaluation of individual CD4/CD8 ratio should be combined with other clinical parameters. Conclusions: Patients with small cell lung cancer have altered lymphocyte homeostasis. Lymphopenia was a long-lasting feature of the enrolled patients who were treated with radiotherapy. The available lymphocyte subsets levels might be used to manage the clinical treatment scheme.

[Bispecific antibodies targeting CD3 in oncology and hematology]. / Anticorps bispécifiques ciblant CD3 en oncologie solide et onco-hématologie.

Bispecific therapies targeting CD3, so-called T-cell engagers (TCE), belong to the new spectrum of anti-tumor immunotherapies stimulating T-lymphocytes. TCE are unique constructs targeting the MHC-independent CD3 epsilon subunit (CD3e) and a tumor antigen. To date, only blinatumomab have reached market agreements in lymphoid malignancies with constructs targeting CD3exCD19. Other TCE are in advances development, with promising results targeting CD20 and BSMA in lymphoma and myeloma. These successes have relaunched the development of TCE in solid tumors, bringing mixed results so far (notably in terms of tolerance). Still, TCE pave the way to new immunotherapy in tumors considered to be refractory to inhibitors of immune checkpoints such as prostate cancer or colorectal cancer.

Diversity and heterogeneity of immune states in non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer.

Blood-based biomarkers including systemic inflammation (SI) indicators or circulating factors (cytokines, chemokines, or growth factors) are associated with a poor prognosis for lung cancer patients. Collectively these biomarkers can predict the immune state of a patient. We wanted to define and compare the immune states of small cell and non-small cell lung cancer patients, in the hopes that the information gained could lead to overall improvements in patient care and outcomes. Specimens and data from 235 patients was utilized, 49 surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with no evidence of disease (DF), 135 advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 51 small cell lung cancer (SCLC). SI markers neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), systemic inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) were determined from blood counts. Forty-seven plasma cytokines were measured using a multiplex bead-based assay. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards models. NSCLC patients had significantly high levels of SI markers than SCLC and DF patients, while NLR, PLR and SII were also higher in SCLC than DF patients. SI optimized marker values to differentiate SI value were; 6.04 (NLR), 320 (PLR), 1615 (SII), and 7.3 (SIRI). Elevated levels NLR (p<0.001), PLR (p<0.001), and SII (p = 0.018) were associated with a worse PFS and OS in NSCLC, while none of the markers were associated with PFS in SCLC patients. NSCLC patients with a poor outcome displayed heterogeneous immune states relative to systemic inflammation and circulating IL-6 markers. These groups could be distinguished based on the cytokines IL-8, TNFα, and IL-27. We identified heterogeneity of immune states in SCLC and NSCLC patients and in NSCLC patients with the poorest prognosis. This heterogeneity could be exploited to improve outcomes for these patients.

Identification of Potential Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers for Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor Response in Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND Immune-checkpoint inhibitors have propelled the field of therapeutics for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatment, but are only beneficial to some patients. The objective of this study was to identify valid biomarkers for good potential response to immunotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed an integrated analysis of the available datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) projects, Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), TISIDB database, and Lung Cancer Explorer (LCE) database. Six prognosis-related genes (MCM2, EZH2, CENPK, CHEK1, CDKN2A, and EXOSC2) were identified utilizing the meta workflow of data analysis methods. We performed subclass mapping to compare their expression profiles to other datasets of patients who responded to immunotherapy. A drug sensitivity predictive model was used to predict the chemotherapeutic response to cisplatin and etoposide. RESULTS Our results showed that the expression of the 6 key genes was significantly associated with the overall survival of patients with SCLC. Lower expression of these 6 genes was correlated to the response to anti-PD-1 treatment. Additionally, low expression of MCM2, EZH2, CENPK, and CHEK1 was correlated with increased sensitivity to cisplatin, but not etoposide. CONCLUSIONS Overall, our data showed that MCM2, EZH2, CENPK, CHEK1, CDKN2A, and EXOSC2 are potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers for response to immune-checkpoint inhibitor treatment in patients with SCLC. Further studies with large sample sizes are required to validate our findings and to explore the detailed mechanisms underlying the role of these genes in SCLC.

PIV and PILE Score at Baseline Predict Clinical Outcome of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Combined With Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate whether PIV (Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value) and PILE [a score derived from PIV, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)] can predict clinical outcome of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods: A total of 53 patients with ES-SCLC in the control group of clinical trial (NCT03041311) were included in this study. PIV was calculated as follows: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. The PILE scores were composited based on PIV, LDH levels, and ECOG PS. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox hazards regression models were used for survival analyses. Moreover, the predictive ability of PIV and PILE was validated in an independent real-world group consisting of 84 patients. Results: Patients in the low PIV group (PIV < median) had longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those in the high PIV group (PIV ≥ median), along with the HR, which was 2.157 and 2.359, respectively (PFS HR 95% CI: 1.181-3.940, p = 0.012; OS HR 95% CI: 1.168-4.762, p = 0.020). High PILE score was observed relating to worse treatment efficacy (disease control rate (DCR): 84.21% vs. 100%, p = 0.047; durable clinical benefit (DCB) rate: 10% vs. 48.5%, p = 0.060) and poor clinical outcome (median PFS: 4.75 vs. 5.53 m, p = 0.043; median OS: 7.13 vs. 15.93 m, p = 0.002). Similar results were obtained about the predictive and prognostic abilities of PIV and PILE scores in the validation group. Conclusions: High PIV and high PILE were correlated with worse clinical outcomes in ES-SCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy, reflecting that PIV and PILE might be useful to identify patients unlikely to benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

Cold and heterogeneous T cell repertoire is associated with copy number aberrations and loss of immune genes in small-cell lung cancer.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is speculated to harbor complex genomic intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) associated with high recurrence rate and suboptimal response to immunotherapy. Here, using multi-region whole exome/T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing as well as immunohistochemistry, we reveal a rather homogeneous mutational landscape but extremely cold and heterogeneous TCR repertoire in limited-stage SCLC tumors (LS-SCLCs). Compared to localized non-small cell lung cancers, LS-SCLCs have similar predicted neoantigen burden and genomic ITH, but significantly colder and more heterogeneous TCR repertoire associated with higher chromosomal copy number aberration (CNA) burden. Furthermore, copy number loss of IFN-γ pathway genes is frequently observed and positively correlates with CNA burden. Higher mutational burden, higher T cell infiltration and positive PD-L1 expression are associated with longer overall survival (OS), while higher CNA burden is associated with shorter OS in patients with LS-SCLC.

Identification of a prognostic immune-related signature for small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: As a subgroup of lung cancer, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by a short tumor doubling time, high rates of early occurred distant cancer spread, and poor outcomes. Despite its exquisite sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, acquired drug resistance and tumor progression are typical. This study aimed to develop a robust signature based on immune-related genes to predict the outcome of patients with SCLC. METHODS: The expression data of 77 SCLC patients from George's cohort were divided into training set and testing set, and 1534 immune-related genes from ImmPort database were used to generate and validate the signature. Cox proportional hazards and the Kaplan-Meier analysis were used for developing and testing the prognostic signature. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis was used to determine immune cell infiltration phenotypes. RESULTS: A 10-gene model comprising NR3C1, NR1D2, TANK, ARAF, HDGF, INHBE, LRSAM1, PLXNA1, PML, and SP1 with the highest frequency after 1000 interactions, was chosen to construct immune-related signature. This signature showed robust predictive value for SCLC patients' survival in both training and testing sets. This signature was weakly associated with the clinic pathological values like TNM stage. Furthermore, patients with low risk presented with activation of immune signal pathways, and specific immune cell infiltration with high levels of CD56bright NK cells but low levels of CD8+ T cells, mast cells, and helper T cells. CONCLUSION: The present study developed immune-related signature that may help predict the prognosis of SCLC patients, which reflects an unappreciated level of heterogeneity of immunophenotype associated with diverse prognosis for specific subsets in this highly lethal cancer type.

Anti-GABAB receptor encephalitis associated with combined small cell lung carcinoma.

Autoimmune encephalitis with antibodies against the gamma-aminobutyric acid-B receptor is a relatively rare disease. We report a case with characteristic symptoms of limbic encephalitis associated with combined small cell lung carcinoma. The brain magnetic resonance imaging showed bilateral temporal lesions and the photoemission tomography revealed regional heterogenous metabolism across the brain. The double labeling of anti-gamma-aminobutyric acid-B receptor autoantibodies both in the tissues of neuroendocrine and small cell neoplasia was a unique feature of this patient.

RETRACTED: Enhanced AC133-specific CAR T cell therapy induces durable remissions in mice with metastatic small cell lung cancer.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief. Following the publication of the above article, the Editor was notified that an error occurred in which all images were published with incorrect versions. The Editor has taken the decision that the manuscript is no longer acceptable in its current form, nor with a corrigendum, as the extensive changes to the figures and publication would lead to ambiguity for our readers. We have therefore made the decision to retract this manuscript from Cancer Letters with the possibility of resubmission and republication of the manuscript in its corrected form after peer review.

The landscape of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy has resulted in significant survival benefits in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without increasing toxicity. However, the utilisation of immunotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear, with a scarcity of systematic comparisons of therapeutic effects and safety of immunotherapy in these two major lung cancer subtypes. Herein, we aimed to provide a comprehensive landscape of immunotherapy and systematically review its specific efficacy and safety in advanced lung cancer, accounting for histological types. METHODS: We identified studies assessing immunotherapy for lung cancer with predefined endpoints, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), from PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane library. A random-effects or fixed-effect model was adopted according to different settings. RESULTS: Overall, 38 trials with 20,173 patients with lung cancer were included in this study. ICI therapy resulted in a significantly prolonged survival in both patients with NSCLC and SCLC when compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.79] and [HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.90], respectively). The magnitude of disease control and survival benefits appeared superior with ICI plus standard of care (SOC) when compared with SOC alone. OS and PFS advantages were observed only when immunotherapy was employed as the first-line treatment in patients with SCLC. CONCLUSION: ICI therapy is a promising therapeutic option in patients with NSCLC and SCLC. ICI plus SOC can be recommended as the optimal first-line treatment for patients with SCLC, and double-target ICIs combined with SOC are recommended in patients with NSCLC as both the first and subsequent lines of treatment. Additionally, non-first-line immunotherapy is not recommended in patients with SCLC.