Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 36
Filter
1.
J Appl Toxicol ; 42(1): 130-153, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34247391

ABSTRACT

Exposure to spray cleaning products constitutes a potential risk for asthma induction. We set out to review whether substances in such products are potential inducers of asthma. We identified 101 spray cleaning products for professional use. Twenty-eight of their chemical substances were selected. We based the selection on (a) positive prediction for respiratory sensitisation in humans based on quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) in the Danish (Q)SAR Database, (b) positive QSAR prediction for severe skin irritation in rabbits and (c) knowledge on the substances' physico-chemical characteristics and toxicity. Combining the findings in the literature and QSAR predictions, we could group substances into four classes: (1) some indication in humans for asthma induction: chloramine, benzalkonium chloride; (2) some indication in animals for asthma induction: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), citric acid; (3) equivocal data: hypochlorite; (4) few or lacking data: nitriloacetic acid, monoethanolamine, 2-(2-aminoethoxy)ethanol, 2-diethylaminoethanol, alkyldimethylamin oxide, 1-aminopropan-2-ol, methylisothiazolinone, benzisothiazolinone and chlormethylisothiazolinone; three specific sulphonates and sulfamic acid, salicylic acid and its analogue sodium benzoate, propane-1,2-diol, glycerol, propylidynetrimethanol, lactic acid, disodium malate, morpholine, bronopol and benzyl alcohol. In conclusion, we identified an asthma induction potential for some of the substances. In addition, we identified major knowledge gaps for most substances. Thus, more data are needed to feed into a strategy of safe-by-design, where substances with potential for induction of asthma are avoided in future (spray) cleaning products. Moreover, we suggest that QSAR predictions can serve to prioritise substances that need further testing in various areas of toxicology.


Subject(s)
Cosmetics/toxicity , Detergents/toxicity , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Respiratory System/drug effects , Soaps/toxicity , Animals , Asthma , Humans , Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship , Respiratory System/physiopathology
3.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 56: 60-6, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23429043

ABSTRACT

1,2-Benzisothiazolin-3-one (BIT; CAS # 2634-33-5) is a preservative used in consumer products. Dermal exposure to BIT at sufficient dose and duration can produce skin sensitization and allergic contact dermatitis in animals and susceptible humans.The purpose of this study is to derive a maximal concentration of BIT in various consumer products that would result in exposures below the No Expected Sensitization Induction Level (NESIL), a dose below which skin sensitization should not occur. A screening level exposure estimate was performed for several product use scenarios with sunscreen, laundry detergent, dish soap, and spray cleaner. We calculated that BIT concentrations below the following concentrations of 0.0075%, 0.035%, 0.035%, 0.021% in sunscreen, laundry detergent, dish soap, and spray cleaner, respectively, are unlikely to induce skin sensitization. We completed a pilot study consisting of bulk sample analysis of one representative product from each category labelled as containing BIT, and found BIT concentrations of 0.0009% and 0.0027% for sunscreen and dish soap, respectively. BIT was not detected in the laundry detergent and spray cleaner products above the limit of detection of 0.0006%. Based on publically available data for product formulations and our results, we were able to establish that cleaning products and sunscreens likely contain BIT at concentrations similar to or less than our calculated maximal safe concentrations and that exposures are unlikely to induce skin sensitization in most users.


Subject(s)
Consumer Product Safety , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/toxicity , Sunscreening Agents/analysis , Thiazoles/toxicity , Animals , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Detergents/analysis , Detergents/toxicity , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Pilot Projects , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/analysis , Risk Assessment , Soaps/analysis , Soaps/toxicity , Thiazoles/analysis
5.
Nanotoxicology ; 5(1): 12-29, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21417685

ABSTRACT

The rapid increase in the number of consumer products containing engineered nanoparticles (ENP) raises concerns about an appropriate risk assessment of these products. Along with toxicological data, exposure estimates are essential for assessing risk. Currently, cosmetics and personal care products (C&PCP) represent the largest ENP-containing consumer product class on the market. We analyzed factors influencing the likelihood that ENP-containing products are available to consumers. We modelled potential external exposure of German consumers, assuming a maximum possible case where only ENP-containing products are used. The distribution of exposure levels within the population due to different behavior patterns was included by using data from an extensive database on consumer behavior. Exposure levels were found to vary significantly between products and between consumers showing different behavior patterns. The assessment scheme developed here represents a basis for refined exposure modelling as soon as more specific information about ENPs in C&PCP becomes available.


Subject(s)
Cosmetics/analysis , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Manufactured Materials/statistics & numerical data , Nanoparticles/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Body Weight , Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/toxicity , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Manufactured Materials/analysis , Manufactured Materials/toxicity , Models, Biological , Models, Chemical , Nanoparticles/analysis , Nanoparticles/toxicity , Risk Assessment , Soaps/chemistry , Soaps/toxicity , Sunscreening Agents/analysis , Sunscreening Agents/chemistry , Sunscreening Agents/toxicity
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20445294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Detergents are used by almost every household in the developed and developing world. Soap and most detergents are anionic surfactants and attack the horny layer of the skin and increase its permeability with little or no inflammatory change and may result in hand eczema, which is very distressing and incapacitating. AIM: To evaluate the irritant potential of common household detergents (laundry and dish wash) used by the Indian population using a 24-hour patch test and to convincingly educate the patients on the detergents less likely to cause irritation in the particular individual. METHODS: Seventeen commonly used detergents found in Indian market were included in the study, of which, 12 were laundry detergents (powders--seven, bar soap--five) and five were dish wash detergents (powder--one, liquid--one, bar soap--three). The irritant potential of the 17 detergents were evaluated in 30 volunteers. Thirty microliters of each of the detergent bar solutions, distilled water (negative control), and 20% SDS (positive control) were applied to Finn chambers with a micropipette and occluded for 24 hours. Erythema, scaling, and edema were graded in comparison to the reaction at the negative control site (distilled water) for each volunteer separately. The scoring of erythema/dryness and wrinkling on a 0-4 point scale and edema on another 0-4 point scale was based on the Draize scale. The pH of each of the detergent solutions was determined using litmus papers (Indikrom papers from Qualigens fine chemicals). RESULTS: The difference between detergents (F value) was significant for erythema/dryness and wrinkling (F = 3.374; p = 0.000), but not significant for edema (F = 1.297; p = 0.194). [Table 2] lists the means for erythema/dryness and wrinkling, and edema. The F value of the totals of the means for erythema/dryness and wrinkling and edema was significant (F = 2.495; p = 0.001). The pH of all the detergents was found to be alkaline except Pril utensil cleaner which tested acidic (pH 6). The positive control, 20% SDS also tested acidic (pH 6). CONCLUSION: Similar to patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis, 24-hour patch testing with detergent solutions (8% w/v), will educate the patient on what detergent to avoid. This may bring down the total medication requirement and frequent hospital consultations for these patients.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Irritant/etiology , Dermatitis, Irritant/pathology , Detergents/toxicity , Family Characteristics , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/pathology , Detergents/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , India , Irritants/administration & dosage , Irritants/toxicity , Male , Patch Tests/methods , Soaps/administration & dosage , Soaps/toxicity , Young Adult
7.
Pest Manag Sci ; 66(6): 650-6, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20201054

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The toxicities of pyrethrins + rapeseed oil, pyrethrins + piperonyl butoxide (PBO), potassium salts of fatty acids and linseed oil were assessed in the laboratory on the parasitic wasp Aphidius rhopalosiphi (Destefani-Perez), the ladybird Adalia bipunctata (L.), the rove beetle Aleochara bilineata (Gyll.) and the carabid beetle Bembidion lampros (Herbst.). The methods selected were residual contact toxicity tests on inert and natural substrates. RESULTS: Both the pyrethrin products led to 100% mortality in the adult parasitic wasps and ladybird larvae on glass plates and plants. The pyrethrins + PBO formulation was toxic for B. lampros on sand and natural soil, but the pyrethrins + rapeseed oil formulation was harmless for this species. Insecticidal soaps were harmless for all these beneficial species. None of the tested products significantly affected the parasitism of the onion fly pupae by A. bilineata. CONCLUSION: The results indicated the potentially high toxicity of natural pyrethrins for beneficial arthropods. Although this toxicity needs to be confirmed in field conditions, the toxicity levels obtained in the laboratory were similar to or higher than those of several synthetic insecticides known to be toxic in the field. Insecticidal soaps could be considered as an alternative for aphid control in organic farming in terms of selectivity.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Aphids , Coleoptera/drug effects , Conservation of Natural Resources , Insecticides/toxicity , Wasps/drug effects , Animals , Biological Products/toxicity , Coleoptera/physiology , Larva/drug effects , Pest Control, Biological , Pyrethrins/toxicity , Soaps/toxicity , Wasps/physiology
8.
Cutan Ocul Toxicol ; 27(2): 77-85, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18568892

ABSTRACT

The bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay can be used to predict relative eye irritation potential of surfactant-based personal care formulations relative to a corporate benchmark. The human eye sting test is typically used to evaluate product claims of no tears/no stinging for children's bath products. A preliminary investigation was conducted to test a hypothesis that the BCOP assay could be used as a prediction model for relative ranking of human eye irritation responses under conditions of a standard human eye sting test to surfactant-based formulations. BCOP assays and human eye sting tests were conducted on 4 commercial and 1 prototype body wash (BW) developed specifically for children or as mild bath products. In the human eye sting test, 10 mul of a 10% dosing solution is instilled into one eye of each panelist (n = 20), and the contralateral eye is dosed with sterile water as a control. Bulbar conjunctival erythema responses of each eye are graded at 30 seconds by an ophthalmologist. The BCOP assay permeability values (optical density at 490 nm [OD(490)]) for the 5 BWs ranged from 0.438 to 1.252 (i.e., least to most irritating). By comparison, the number of panelists exhibiting erythema responses (mild to moderately pink) ranged from 3 of 20 panelists for the least irritating BW to 10 of 20 panelists for the most irritating BW tested. The relative ranking of eye irritation potential of the 5 BWs in the BCOP assay compares favorably with the relative ranking of the BWs in the human eye sting test. Based on these findings, the permeability endpoint of the BCOP assay, as described for surfactant-based formulations, showed promise as a prediction model for relative ranking of conjunctival erythema responses in the human eye. Consequently, screening of prototype formulations in the BCOP assay would allow for formula optimization of mild bath products prior to investment in a human eye sting test.


Subject(s)
Corneal Opacity/chemically induced , Cosmetics/toxicity , Erythema/chemically induced , Eye/drug effects , Pain/chemically induced , Soaps/toxicity , Toxicity Tests/methods , Animals , Biological Assay/methods , Cattle , Child , Conjunctiva/drug effects , Cornea/drug effects , Cosmetics/chemistry , Fluorescein , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Permeability/drug effects , Soaps/chemistry , Surface-Active Agents/toxicity , Tears/metabolism
9.
Pest Manag Sci ; 64(3): 249-54, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18172884

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The effects of an insecticidal soap on the survival, fitness and behaviour of an aphid parasitoid wasp, Aphidius colemani (Viereck), were studied in the laboratory. The LC(50) (soap concentration causing 50% mortality 24 h after treatment) was determined. The survival of parasitoid larvae (% adult emergence), fitness (tibia length of adults) and number of eggs produced per female parasitoid that survived in third- and fourth-instar aphids treated with insecticidal soap LC(50) were also assessed. The LC(50) for third- and fourth-instar aphids was determined to be 3.25 g L(-1). Acceptance by female parasitoids of aphids that survived their LC(50) was also tested. RESULTS: The soap concentration causing 100% mortality in adult wasps 24 h after treatment was 17.5 g L(-1). The LC(50) was 2.75 g L(-1). Soap did not have any effect on the survival of parasitoid immatures or on the fitness or number of eggs produced per female parasitoid. Wasps that were in contact with treated aphids did not oviposit as much in them as in untreated aphids, indicating that female parasitoids detected aphids treated with insecticidal soap. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that aphid parasitoids released following treatment with insecticidal soap are likely to accept a lower proportion of the surviving aphids. Biological control programmes could be ameliorated by soap applications if the latter were made 1 day before the release of wasps in the greenhouse.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Insecticides/toxicity , Soaps/toxicity , Wasps/drug effects , Zygote/drug effects , Animals , Aphids/drug effects , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Larva/drug effects , Lethal Dose 50 , Male , Oviposition/drug effects , Wasps/physiology
10.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 14(3): 163-4, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17473612

ABSTRACT

Nonaccidental injury is always a concern when children present with unusual injuries. The case of a child who presented with a partial thickness burn secondary to prolonged contact with a liquid biological laundry detergent is described. Initially there was some doubt as to whether the agent in question could cause this injury but a small experiment on a volunteer confirmed it was possible.


Subject(s)
Burns, Chemical/etiology , Child Abuse/diagnosis , Detergents/toxicity , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Infant , Soaps/toxicity
12.
Cutan Ocul Toxicol ; 25(3): 217-33, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16980247

ABSTRACT

Evaluation of eye irritation potential is a routine part of product safety testing. Many companies have elected to use in vitro methods for this evaluation. We used the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay for the prediction of the eye irritation potential of surfactant-based rinse-off personal care formulations in this study because of its positive performance in previous studies (1), and its potential to measure depth of injury through histological evaluation. The BCOP uses isolated corneas maintained in short-term organ culture and measures changes in opacity and epithelial barrier integrity (as determined by fluorescein passage through the cornea). Surfactants (anionic and nonionic) used in personal care formulations induce only small increases in direct opacity but the degree of epithelial damage is reflected in permeability measurement (OD490). The permeability measurement is the primary endpoint for this class of products. Marketed liquid hand soap was selected as the benchmark due to extensive in vivo and market history data. Using the liquid hand soap, a 25% v/v aqueous dilution with a 30-minute exposure produced the optimal resolution. A series of products with known in vivo eye irritation scores were evaluated to establish a prediction model. Histological evaluation was used to compare the degree of tissue damage to the permeability scores. Based on the permeability scores and histological review, the testing protocol for a surfactant-based rinse-off personal care formulation was developed using a 25% v/v aqueous dilution, a 30-minute exposure, concurrent testing of the benchmark control, and use of permeability measurements as the endpoint for the evaluation of eye irritation potential.


Subject(s)
Cornea/drug effects , Irritants/toxicity , Surface-Active Agents/toxicity , Toxicity Tests/methods , Animal Testing Alternatives , Animals , Benchmarking , Biological Assay/methods , Cattle , Consumer Product Safety , Cornea/metabolism , Cornea/pathology , Corneal Opacity , Organ Culture Techniques , Permeability , Reproducibility of Results , Soaps/toxicity
13.
Occup Environ Med ; 63(4): 261-6, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16556746

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intervention development research is an essential prerequisite of any study that attempts to determine whether specific interventions work to prevent work related injury and illness. METHODS: Focus groups (n = 5) and direct observational studies (n = 21) of printers were used to elicit key issues that would aid the development of subsequent interventions. Transcripts from these were analysed by standard qualitative methods to identify common and related themes. RESULTS: The views of managers differed significantly from those of print workers in a number of areas, and working practices did not always follow policy. The majority of printers did not perceive dermatitis to be a major problem, although many complained of dry hands. Other key results included: the lack of skin care policy in most companies; poor understanding of the nature, causes, and treatment of dermatitis; low priority of dermatitis within health and safety concerns; little or no provision of occupational health services, particularly skin checks; variability in provision of and access to appropriate skin protection; and lack of accessible washing facilities. CONCLUSIONS: As a result it was decided to evaluate the implementation of four INTERVENTIONS: provision of (1) skin checks and treatment advice; (2) gloves of the correct type and size, and use of an after-work cream; (3) information on dermatitis within the printing industry; and (4) development of best practice skin care policy.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Occupational/prevention & control , Health Promotion/supply & distribution , Occupational Health Services/supply & distribution , Occupational Health , Printing , Attitude to Health , Counseling/methods , Counseling/standards , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/psychology , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Focus Groups , Gloves, Protective/standards , Gloves, Protective/supply & distribution , Hand Disinfection , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Humans , Occupational Health Services/standards , Ointments/therapeutic use , Safety Management/organization & administration , Safety Management/standards , Skin Tests/methods , Soaps/toxicity , Solvents/toxicity , United Kingdom
14.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 43(3): 249-59, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16213074

ABSTRACT

In the absence of chemical-specific data, the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) provides a method to determine a conservative estimate of a chronic oral exposure below which there is a very low probability of risk. The TTC approach was originally developed to support exposures to indirect food additives and was based on linear low-dose risk estimates to assure protection in the event that the chemical was later determined to be a carcinogen. Subsequently, TTC values based on noncancer endpoints were proposed for chemicals without structural alerts for genotoxicity. The original database supporting the TTC values for noncancer endpoints includes >600 structurally diverse chemicals. The objectives of this work were to evaluate the applicability of the TTC database to ingredients used in consumer products based on a comparison of the diversity of chemical structures with those in the original TTC database and to confirm that the range of NOELs for these ingredients is consistent with the range of NOELs in the original database. The results show good coverage of the product ingredient structures and confirm that the NOELs for the ingredient chemicals are similar in range to the original dataset, supporting the use of the TTC for ingredients in consumer products.


Subject(s)
Detergents/toxicity , Household Products/toxicity , Soaps/toxicity , Animals , Carcinogenicity Tests , Databases, Factual , Detergents/chemistry , Household Products/analysis , Humans , Mice , Mutagenicity Tests , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Rabbits , Rats , Soaps/chemistry , Structure-Activity Relationship
15.
Pest Manag Sci ; 60(12): 1231-6, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15578604

ABSTRACT

The contact toxicity of indoxacarb, abamectin, endosulfan, insecticide soap, S-kinoprene and dimethoate to Orius insidiosus (Say) and Aphidius colemani Viereck were studied in the laboratory. These beneficials are often used in the greenhouses to manage various insect pests. Indoxacarb is slow acting and therefore, to estimate lethal dosages, observations should be continued for several days until data stabilize. Seven days after treatment, the LC50 was 0.119 g AI litre(-1) for O insidiosus adults and 0.019 g AI litre(-1) for A colemani. At that time, the recommended field concentration was 0.479 times the LC50 for O insidiosus adults and three times the LC50 for A colemani. In contrast, indoxacarb had no adverse effect on the reproductive capacity of wasps surviving a treatment or the developing wasps in the aphid mummy. Among the other insecticides S-kinoprene was the most innocuous while dimethoate was the most toxic to the two beneficials. The other insecticides had overlapping toxicities.


Subject(s)
Heteroptera/drug effects , Hymenoptera/drug effects , Insecticides/toxicity , Ivermectin/analogs & derivatives , Oxazines/toxicity , Animals , Biological Assay , Dimethoate/toxicity , Endosulfan/toxicity , Ivermectin/toxicity , Juvenile Hormones/toxicity , Logistic Models , Pest Control, Biological , Soaps/toxicity
16.
West Afr J Med ; 23(1): 48-9, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15171526

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the cause, possible pathogenesis and management of "idiopathic" urethral pain in boys. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Eighteen boys presenting with distal urethral pains over a period of 12 years were reviewed and their responses to the application of bland petroleum jelly to the external urethral meatus before each soap bath was noted. RESULTS: The symptoms started suddenly while bathing with soap. Penile erections at onset occurred in 14 (78%). Two (11%) had purulent urethral discharge and 1 (5.5%) had meatal stenosis. Application of bland petroleum jelly to the external urethral meatus before each soap bath satisfactorily controlled the urethral pains. CONCLUSION: "Idiopathic urethral pain in boys" may be due to soap induced chemical urethritis and responds well to application of bland petroleum jelly to the external urethral meatus before each soap bath with appropriate antibiotics when there is associated purulent urethral discharge.


Subject(s)
Pain/etiology , Soaps/toxicity , Urethral Diseases/chemically induced , Baths/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease , Humans , Male , Pain Management , Penile Erection/physiology , Petrolatum/administration & dosage , Urethral Diseases/complications , Urethral Diseases/prevention & control
17.
Altern Lab Anim ; 32(4): 339-43, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15651917

ABSTRACT

In an attempt to improve the in vitro test strategy for the estimation of eye irritation, a neuronal cell model has been developed, with cells expressing vanilloid receptor type 1 (VR1) nociceptors. The currently accepted method for measuring eye irritancy is the ethically and scientifically criticised Draize rabbit eye test, despite the fact that alternative in vitro methods are available which have proved to be reliable and reproducible for predicting severe ocular toxicity. However, no alternative tests for measuring neuronal stimulation have yet been developed, and the prediction of eye irritation in the mild range is therefore insufficient. VR1 is a nociceptor localised in C-fibre neurons innervating the cornea and the surrounding tissue, and it responds to potentially damaging stimuli by releasing Ca2+ into the cytoplasm. As a sensory endpoint, [Ca2+]i was measured in VR1 transfected cells, as well as in control cells. Short-term cell cytotoxicity studies (cell membrane rupture and morphological divergence) were used to determine the non-corrosive concentrations of the test chemicals. Preliminary results indicated that hygiene products used daily may induce eye irritation via VR1 nociceptors. The lowest toxic concentration (0.025%) of liquid hand soap, as determined by morphologic divergences of cells, generated an 80% increase in [Ca2+]i over the basal [Ca2+]i in VR1 transfected cells, whereas the non-specific [Ca2+]i increased by 33%. Furthermore, all the endpoints studied indicated that shampoo for children was less active than shampoo for adults. If this method is successfully validated with standardised reference chemicals, the model could complete the test battery of in vitro alternatives, resulting in the saving of thousands of laboratory animals.


Subject(s)
Animal Testing Alternatives , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Neurons, Afferent/drug effects , Calcium/metabolism , Cosmetics/toxicity , Humans , Models, Biological , Neuroblastoma , Receptors, Drug/analysis , Receptors, Drug/drug effects , Receptors, Drug/physiology , Soaps/toxicity , Toxicity Tests , Tumor Cells, Cultured
18.
Pest Manag Sci ; 58(3): 255-60, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11975171

ABSTRACT

The relationship between dose for each of four biorational insecticides (pyrethrins, neem extract, capsiacin extract, insecticidal soap) and mortality of the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) was determined using a laboratory bioassay. These insecticides were toxic to aphids and paired mixtures of the insecticides provided synergistic activity as measured by aphid mortality under the laboratory bioassay conditions. Capsiacin extracts were found to provide low levels of mortality alone but acted synergistically in mixtures with the other insecticides and provided higher than expected levels of mortality. Activity as determined in the laboratory for each insecticide was not evident under field-use conditions in five separate experiments. Under field conditions and using common application methods, these insecticides did not provide significant levels of control of aphids.


Subject(s)
Aphids/drug effects , Insecticides/toxicity , Limonins , Pest Control, Biological/methods , Agriculture , Animals , Biological Assay , Capsaicin/administration & dosage , Capsaicin/toxicity , Drug Synergism , Insecticides/administration & dosage , Laboratories , Lethal Dose 50 , Pyrethrins/administration & dosage , Pyrethrins/toxicity , Soaps/administration & dosage , Soaps/toxicity , Triterpenes/administration & dosage , Triterpenes/toxicity
19.
Risk Anal ; 21(3): 499-511, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11572429

ABSTRACT

Little information is available on product use by consumers, which severely hampers exposure estimation for consumer products. This article describes actual contact with several consumer products, specifically dishwashing detergents, cleaning products, and hair styling products. How and where products are handled, as well as the duration, frequency, and amount of use were studied by means of diaries, in-home observations, and measurements. This study addressed the question, "To what extent are frequency, duration, and amount of use associated?" Findings showed that there was a large intra- as well as interindividual variation in frequency, duration, and amount of use, with the interindividual variation being considerably larger. At the same time, results showed that, for a given activity, users tended to follow their own routine. Few relations were found among frequency, duration, and amount of use. It was concluded that among persons, frequency, duration, and amount of product act in practice as independent parameters. Diaries appear to be quite suitable for gaining insight into frequently used products. Observations of usage, recorded on video, were indispensable for obtaining particular information on product use. In addition, home visits enabled the collection of specific measurements. Although diaries and home visits are time-consuming, the combination provided insight into variation as well as relations among frequency, duration, and amount of use.


Subject(s)
Household Products/toxicity , Risk Assessment , Adult , Child , Detergents/toxicity , Environmental Exposure , Female , Hair Preparations/toxicity , Humans , Male , Soaps/toxicity , Sodium Hypochlorite/toxicity
20.
J Toxicol Environ Health A ; 53(3): 211-22, 1998 Feb 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9482352

ABSTRACT

The developmental toxicity potential of a scrubbing solution used extensively in petroleum refineries to remove CO2 from hydrogen gas streams was evaluated via inhalation. Pregnant female CD (Sprague-Dawley) rats were exposed to aerosols of a "used" scrubbing solution at 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mg/l for 6 h/d on d 6-19 of pregnancy. Control animals were exposed to filtered air under the same exposure conditions. Dams were sacrificed on d 20 of pregnancy and a laparohysterectomy was performed. The mass median aerodynamic diameter of the aerosol revealed that all particles ranged from 1.6 to 2.8 microm, with geometric standard deviations between 2.0 and 2.3 microm. The overall pregnancy rate was high (>95%) and equivalent across all groups. All pregnant dams had live litters, and 22-24 litters were examined in each group. Treatment-related clinical signs consisted of rales, observed at all exposure levels, and gasping noted only at the 0.3 mg/l exposure level. The occurrence of rales was presumably a localized effect on the respiratory tract and likely due to the irritating properties of the scrubbing solution. Maternal toxicity was exhibited in the 0.3 mg/l group, including reduced body weight, weight gain, and food consumption and one possible treatment-related death on gestation d 17. At scheduled necropsy, there were no treatment-related gross pathological observations and no statistically significant reproductive and developmental effects. The incidences of fetuses with skeletal variations involving the sternum were clustered in two litters at the highest exposure level with atypically low term fetal body weights. Under the conditions of this investigation, potassium carbonate scrubbing solution is not a selective developmental toxicant.


Subject(s)
Carbonates/toxicity , Embryonic and Fetal Development/drug effects , Potassium/toxicity , Soaps/toxicity , Accidents, Occupational , Administration, Inhalation , Aerosols , Animals , Atmosphere Exposure Chambers , Blastocyst/drug effects , Body Weight/drug effects , Carbonates/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Eating/drug effects , Female , Litter Size/drug effects , Petroleum , Potassium/administration & dosage , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/chemically induced , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Respiratory Sounds/etiology , Sternum/abnormalities , Weight Gain/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...